Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lecture 2
Capacity Management & Aggregate Planning
Learning Outcomes of Lecture 2
1. Explain what capacity management is and why it is strategically important
• In business, viewed as the amount of output that a system is capable of achieving over a specific
period of time
• Restaurant: the number of customers who are served between 11:00am and 1:00pm
• Industries whose product mix is very uncertain often express capacity in terms of inputs
• Hospitals: the number of beds
Factors Affecting Capacity Decisions
• External Factors
• Government regulations, e.g., greenhouse gas emission, aquatic pollution
• Union agreements, e.g., maximum working hours
• Supplier capabilities
• Internal Factors
• Personnel and jobs (worker training, job content)
• Product and service design
• Plant layout and process flow
• Equipment capabilities and maintenance
• Materials management
• Quality control systems
• Management capabilities
Production System Capacity Affects:
• Capacity level has a critical impact on response rate, its cost structure, its inventory
policies, and its management and staff support requirements
• Too low: the firm will lose customers and encourage competitors
• Too high: firm may have to cut costs or underutilize its capacity
Capacity Planning Concepts
• Capacity implies the output that a system is capable of achieving over a period of time
• Best operating level: the level of capacity for which the process was designed and the
volume of output at which average unit cost is minimized
• Capacity utilization rate: a measure of how close the firm is to its best possible
operating level
𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑢𝑠𝑒𝑑
𝐶𝑎𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑖𝑡𝑦 𝑢𝑡𝑖𝑙𝑖𝑧𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 =
𝐵𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑜𝑝𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑙𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑙
• The capacity utilization rate is expressed as a percentage and requires the numerator and denominator be measured in the same
units and the same time periods
Capacity Utilization and Service Quality
Source: Adapted from Christopher Lovelock, “Strategies for Managing Capacity-Constrained Services,” Managing
Services: Marketing, Operations Management and Human Resources, 2nd ed. (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992).
Capacity Utilization and Service Quality
• Balancing Capacity and Demand (in service operations)
• Demand exceeds maximum capacity, customers are turned away [You receive a busy signal when you
call to make a hotel reservation.]
• Demand exceeds optimum capacity utilization, customers receive poor service. [You have to wait more
than an hour to be seated in a very busy restaurant.]
• Demand equals optimum capacity utilization, customers are serviced properly. [Your wait at the
supermarket checkout is short even though all of the checkout stations are being used.]
• Demand is less than optimum capacity utilization, there is idle capacity. [Your telephone call is
answered immediately or you are seated immediately in a restaurant.]
• Low rates are appropriate when the degree of uncertainty (in demand) is high
and/or the stakes are high (e.g., emergency rooms)
• Higher rates are possible for predictable services or those without extensive
customer contact (e.g., commuter trains, postal sorting)
Economies & Diseconomies of Scale
Economies & Diseconomies of Scale
• Economies of scale: the idea that as a plant gets larger and volume increases, the average
cost per unit tends to drop
• More efficient equipment due to advanced technology
• Lower operating and capital cost due to mass production
• Better use of market information
• Volume discounts from suppliers
• Diseconomies of scale: at some point, the plant becomes too large and average cost per
unit begins to increase
• Poor communication, lack of motivation
• Company size becomes too large to manage efficiently
• Higher labor costs
• Higher resource costs
Capacity & Demand Management
4,000 –
Sales in units
3,000 –
2,000 –
JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJ
Time (months)
Complementary Demand Patterns
Sales in units
4,000 –
Snowmobile motor sales
3,000 –
2,000 –
1,000 –
JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJ
Time (months)
Complementary Demand Patterns
Combining both
demand patterns
reduces the
variation
4,000 –
Sales in units
Snowmobile
3,000 – motor sales
2,000 –
JFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJASONDJ
Time (months)
Tactics for Matching Capacity to Demand
1. Making staffing changes
2. Adjusting equipment
➢ Purchasing additional machinery
➢ Selling or leasing out existing equipment
© 2011 Pearson
Education
Demand and Capacity Management in the Service Sector
• Demand management
• Appointment, reservations, FCFS rule
• Capacity management
• Full time, temporary, part-time staff
© 2011 Pearson
Education
Capacity Flexibility
The ability to rapidly (with short lead times) increase or decrease production levels, or to
shift quickly from one product or service to another
1 A 1 A 1 A
2 B 2 B 2 B
3 C 3 C 3 C
4 D 4 D 4 D
William C. Jordan and Stephen C. Graves. 1995. Principles on the Benefits of Manufacturing Process Flexibility. Management Science.
• Performance: dedicated system ≪ long chain ≈ full flexibility
• Adding a little flexibility, if configured in a right way, can lead to extremely effective performance in dealing with demand uncertainty
Considerations in Changing Capacity
Maintaining System Balance
Decreasing Capacity
• The process that companies use to keep demand and supply in balance by
coordinating manufacturing, distribution, marketing and financial plans
• Require an integrated effort with cooperation from sales, distribution and logistics, operations,
finance and product development
• Long-Range Planning
• Focuses on strategic issues relation to capacity, process selection, and plant location
• Intermediate-Range Planning
• Focuses on tactical issues pertaining to aggregate workforce and material requirements for the
coming year
• Short-Range Planning
• Addresses day-to-day issues of scheduling workers on jobs at assigned work stations
Reference: Davis/Heineke 478-489
Overview of Manufacturing Planning Activities
Intermediate-Range Planning
• Aggregate Production Planning
• Translates annual and quarterly business plans into broad labor and output plans for the intermediate
term.
• The process for determining the most cost effective way to match supply and demand over the next 3–
18 months.
Exhibit 19.2
Production Planning Strategies
• Chase Strategy
• Matching the production rate to exactly meet the order rate by hiring and laying off workers as the order rate
varies
• Level Strategy
• Maintain a stable workforce working at constant output rate; absorb demand variations with inventory,
backlogs, or lost sales
Production Planning Strategies (cont’d)
• Pure Strategy
• A simple strategy that uses just one option, such as hiring and firing workers, for meeting demand
• Mixed Strategy
• A more complex strategy that combines options for meeting demand
Costs
Materials cost $100.00 per unit
Inventory holding cost $1.50 per unit per month
Forecasted
Stockout cost $5.00 per unit per month
Subcontracting cost $125.00 per unit
Demand and
Hiring and training cost $200.00 per worker Workdays for
Layoff cost $250.00 per worker
C&A Company
Labor hours required per unit 5.0 per unit
Straight-time cost (first eight hours each day) $4.00 per hour
Overtime cost (time and a half) $6.00 per hour
Initial state
Initial inventory 400 units
Number of workers currently employed 30
Example: Evaluate Alternative Plans
1. Produce to meet (exact) monthly production requirements by varying workforce size
3. Produce to meet the minimum expected demand using a constant workforce and subcontract to
meet additional requirements
4. Produce to meet expected demand for all but the first two months using a constant workforce
and use overtime to meet additional output requirements
First Alternative: Pure Chase Strategy
It is often useful to convert demand forecasts into production requirements.
January February March April May June Total
Demand forecast 2,250 1,450 1,100 900 1,100 1,600 8,400
Working days (per month) 22 19 21 21 22 20 125
Aggregate Plan
Beginning inventory 400 16 25 0 7 33
Production requirements 1,850 1,434 1,075 900 1,093 1,567
Workers Required 53 48 32 27 32 49
- New Workers Hired 23 0 0 0 5 17
- Workers Laid Off 0 5 16 5 0 0
Units produced 1,866 1,459 1,075 907 1,126 1,568 8,001
Ending inventory 16 25 0 7 33 1
Costs
Material cost 186,600 145,900 107,500 90,700 112,600 156,800 $800,100
Hiring cost 4,600 0 0 0 1,000 3,400 $9,000
Layoff cost 0 1,250 4,000 1,250 0 0 $6,500
Straight time cost 37,312 29,184 21,504 18,144 22,528 31,360 $160,032
Inventory carrying cost 24.0 37.5 0.0 10.5 49.5 1.5 $123
Total Cost $975,755
Assume: Once scheduled, all workers will produce at their full potential.
Second Alternative: Pure Level Strategy
January February March April May June Total
Demand forecast 2,250 1,450 1,100 900 1,100 1,600 8,400
Working days (per month) 22 19 21 21 22 20 125
Initial inventory 400
Production requirements 1,850 1,450 1,100 900 1,100 1,600 8,000
Aggregate Plan
Workers Required 40 40 40 40 40 40
- New Workers Hired 10 0 0 0 0 0
- Workers Laid Off 0 0 0 0 0 0
Units produced 1,408 1,216 1,344 1,344 1,408 1,280 8,000
Monthly inventory -442 -234 244 444 308 -320
Cumulative inventory -442 -676 -432 12 320 0
Costs
Material costs 140,800 121,600 134,400 134,400 140,800 128,000 $800,000
Hiring cost 2,000 0 0 0 0 0 $2,000
Layoff cost 0 0 0 0 0 0 $0
Straight Time Cost 28,160 24,320 26,880 26,880 28,160 25,600 $160,000
Inventory carrying cost 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.0 480.0 0.0 $498
Stockout cost 2210.0 3380.0 2160.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 $7,750
Total Cost $970,248
Third Alternative: Minimum Workforce with Subcontracting
• Hire just enough workers to meet the minimum monthly demand