NAME:_REGIE L.

DICEN SECTION:____PHI109E________

WORKSHEET ON PRAGMATISM

Read the scenario carefully and answer the questions following it. Write your answers on the
space provided below.

SCENARIO THREE:

You are a member of a community that is considering building a new community center. The
community that you belong to is very diverse with the local residents varying in age, interests,
and cultural background. So, it is hoped that the construction of this community center might
be able to provide every citizen with a space that can help them get together and strengthen
their social ties.

However, before the plan could go through, you are experiencing several conflicts. Some
residents believe the center should focus on recreational activities, providing spaces for
sports, fitness classes, and social events. Others argue that it should prioritize educational
programs, workshops, and cultural events to cater to a broader range of interests.

In addition to this, the community has limited resources, and there is a debate about the design
and funding of the center. Some residents advocate for a modest and practical design to keep
costs low, while others argue for a more elaborate and aesthetically pleasing design that might
attract additional funding or grants.

As a student of ethics that uses pragmatism as your main ethical principle, how might
a pragmatist approach this situation to achieve the best practical outcome for the
community? How can a pragmatic approach find a balance between recreational and
educational elements to meet the varied needs and interests of the residents? How
might a pragmatist evaluate the debate on the design and funding of the community
center?

As a student, I would approach the pragmatist scenario emphasising real-world

implications, getting involved in the community, being adaptable, and being dedicated
to the community's general well-being. A pragmatic strategy can successfully strike a
balance between recreational and educational aspects to fulfil the different needs and
interests of inhabitants by combining community involvement, design flexibility,
programme diversity, and a commitment to continual evaluation. By focusing on
community needs, conducting practical analyses, involving stakeholders, and
emphasizing adaptability, a pragmatist can contribute to a more informed and
practical resolution to the debate on the design and funding of the community center.