HIMACHAL PARDESH
JAL SHAKTI VIBHAG
PROVIDING IRRIGATION FACILITY
UNDER HP SHIVA PROJECT FOR
CHAUNTRA GOPALPUR AND
DHARAMPUR BLOCK
DISTT. MANDI (H.P)
PACKAGE 7
RAIN WATER HARVESTING
STRUCTURE AT BHADHARWAR_
[Link].L- R.G.I (JV)
[Link] JALANDHAR
PUNJAB
NAGI & ASSOCIATES
E- 215, Phase - 88, INDUSTRIAL AREA, MOHALI
PH, 9814018332
nagi.associatese215@[Link]
© scanned with OKEN Scannerbr REPORT FOR CONSTRUCTION oF CHECK OAM / PAIN WATER HARVESTING StRUCTURE
ADIARWAN ON SON KHAD, DISTT. MANDI (HP)
The project si
© Of propoved RW
Raver ctu
W/check Darn is a
Her, Distt, Mandi ct py
uated In Son kad near village Bhadharwar in
The project comprives of construc
Sater of Son khad for utilization of
Uses
Won of 25 mt high Rain Water Harvesting structure to tap stm
"water supply, Wt irigation and industrial other mutipurpose
cobbles, gravel,
store rain water for odd dry seasons,
The water harvesting structure will create a site seei
economic development of the area,
Catchment Area:
Discharge
The catchment receives main rainfall during $,W. monsoon
‘occasional rainfalls also received in the month of June. Lit
December or January. The discharge of this site has been ca
structure and reproduced in this design report also,
Period of July to Sept. However, some
le rainfall is also received in months of
culated a§ 152 cumecs for design of the
One no of sluices pipe of 0.3 m dia will be provided wi
hich will help to wash out the collected
sediments and improve the life of the structure.
@ scanned with OKEN ScannerLocation
Secation of R.W.H.S : The i t
location pi W.H.S : The immediate site of Dam has been resurveyed and contour levels noted. The
jan and site layout of structure Dam has been given in the Drawing No- DM-1.
height. The main hydraulic
he corresponding subsequent sections.
proval please.
and structural stability
The desi
he design has been carried out for 2.5 m wate!
pene
analysis has been carried out and presented in tl
jetailed design calculations and drawings are submitted for ap|
Execute Engineer
Jal Shakt{ Pivision
Sarkaghat
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner@ scanned with OKEN Scanner=r rere PrererTererTewTrewTre
4
Catchment Area of Bhadharwar on Budroli khad i
roll
The catchment area of Check Dam/R.W.H structure Bhadharwar on Bude
Khad_ had been marked on G.T.$ sheets [Link] project iw structure
Marked with help of G.P.S coordinates of the Check Dam/ R.W:
Bhadharwar on Budroli are 31°41'21.462" N, 76°47'6.702” E.
The catchment area of site has been marked on G.T.S sheets.
i Ss
The survey vertical grid of 4.6 km, for catchment area calculation purposes, ha
been subdivided into 8 vertical sub division .
Horizontal grid of 4 km has been sub divided into 8 subdivisions. Hence area of
one subdivision = 0.575 x 0.5 = 0,288 [Link]
Area Between Grid Lines no. of Rectangles for
Bhadharwar on Budroli khd catchment of Bhadharwar
on Budroli khad
A-B 5-7 : 0.5
B-C 2-7 3.5
cD 1-10 2.2
6.2
Thus catchment area of Check Dam/R.W.H structure Bhadharwar on
Budroli khad =6.2x 0.288
= 1.7856 Say 1.79 [Link]
Catchment area of Check Dam/R.W.H structure Raserh -
On Son khad = 27.75 [Link]
Total catchment area = 1.79 + 27.75 = 29,54 say 29.5 [Link]
ced & Vetted
‘
plies
Associate Brotecenr
@ scanned with OKEN ScannerING STRUCTURES
MYDROULIC DESIGN OF RAIN WATER MARVES
Sr.
No. Particulars
1. Catchment area (Sq. Kim.) eee
Referring to flood estimation report for western Himalayas Zone 7 Wssued by CN.C. teswarch deware
and standards organization Indian Metrological Deptt. and inin of surface transportation’ for
Catchment areas less than [Link], the method given in the report no. R.0.F ~ 16 ublished tf
R.D.S.0 may be used.
As per Railways publication, Flood estimation method 2.1.3. (c) 4 hour rainfall init
duration can be taken as 0.65 of 24 hour rainfall value, or 0.1625 for hourly for thi
24 hr. rainfall intensity can be taken 280mm.
Hence | = 0.1625 x 280 = 45.5mm
As the catchment area is very less let us consider a run off coff. of 0.4
Q=0.278 C1 A =0.278 x 0.40 x 45.5 x 29.5 = 149.25 cumecs
The maximum flood discharge Q from a catchment area A is given by the formulae O=f(A)
While there are a vast number of formulae of this kind proposed for various part of the
world, only a few popular formula used in various part of India are given below.
© Dickens Formula
* Ryves Formula
Dickens formula is the most suitable for the region considered.
Qe =CyA2* = 12 (29.5) ** = 151.89 cumes =152 cumes
Where Q = maximum flood discharge (? Is)
A =catchment area (km? )
Cd = Dickens constant with value between 11 to 14
Ryves Formula
Qe = Cn A2? = 10.2 x 29.57? =97.16 cumes
Cp= 10.2
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner186%2
wsty = (OL +£t="H
“vas/w or, = yreosdde yo Ayaan mold
“mOjaQ SE Payejnr]e> si BBeyIs1p Aemypds ayy ‘18212 Aemijids 43A0 MOY Jo W LT Jo Uap y “EID WED
40 did azinys sapun pasodosd yy w 97°T Jo said auo yum urea W T's 40 sueds Z apyrosd sn 397
“soewno 754 40
aBseypsip ubisap -sX9¢ 40) peubisep eq 0} sey Aemiids ayy sousy 20/0 872} UED MOY JO
Buipeauds ou os sysojIIy O”y UseMjeq PeUYUDD SI jeUUEYD e4y Sy- -aBseYosip AemydS
WWEXT
wgsisl6= 20L+11+57+ 0696 = TL Puvew sin
186xz
wgsoele = BOL + Lt + 8296 = jeuueUD soed ERIS L
WS'OL6 = LL +8296 = IeuUeUD s08s fle UTS 4
wet = peouay
SoBWUND 7S,
152 cumecs
Stilling Basin
H = 4.25 mor all average operating conditions.
The velocity of flow at bucket is given by V. T. Chow formula =
Vr = ig +Ha-V) = Vax98125 + 425+02-17)
q = 152. = 11.82 m°/s/m
2.
D, =(q/g) = (11.827/9.81)? = 2.42m
H, = 975.755 -973.055 = 2.7m
= 22 = lim
2.42
From Fig 7 of | S 4997
Dy = 050m.
O
D;= 0.50 x 2.42 = 1.21m
= 10.15 misec.
@ scanned with OKEN Scannere + Via eT
Oa 4
Ad Vea) Lai
2 Aateom 4
42am
Froude number — Fr Y © 1016 = 295
Jab, JoBixiar
Cistern level = 668.8 + 17-4.28 % 0.85 © 966.86
(As per clause [Link] cistern level may be raised by 15% of D2)
Length of the stiling basin as per 1S 4997 for Fr = 2.96 (stiling basin of type | is to be provided.)
Wd, = 3.6 for F=2.95
L, = 36%428 = 154m.
Basin Appurtenances for type | stilling basin
1. Chute blocks: -Height = 2D, =2 x 1.21 m =2.42 m Provided 1.0 mto match cistern depth
2. Width D, = 1.21 Provided 0.7 m
3 Spacing D, =0.8 Provided 0.7 m
wou
4. Basin blocks :- as the velocity is less than 15 m /sec, hence basin blocks will be
provided. For Fr =2.95
he =1.25,h, = 1.25% 1.21 = 1.51 msay 1.50m
D;
5. width of blocks = h,= 1.50 m Provided 0.7 m to have better dissipation of energy.
Distance from chute block = 0.8D; = 0.8 x 4.28 = 3.42 m, provided 5.0 m
6. End sil :- Height ofthe sill shall be kept in slope of 2:1 degree to meet again to the bed
level, generally height is = 0.2 d, = 0.2 x 4.28 = 0.856 m provided 0.75 m
Spacing between detonated sill = 0.15 D, = 0.15 x 4.28 = 0.642 ™ provided 0.60 m
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner— = TS
Radius of buckot
Dissipation of high energy of spillway water can be effected by use of 4 submerged bucket
deflector Radius of bucket depends upon Froude number of water entering at bucket and depth
of tall water level.
Radius of bucket is derived with the help of Ven Te Chow formula
Ref eq 2.22 of Irrigation structures by R.S. Varshney and Gupta.
R=0.305 x 10°
P = V+64 xHd +4.88
3.6 Hd + 19.
0.15 +6.4x%425+488 = 42.24 = 1.213
3.6%4,25 +19.5 34.8
R=0.305x 10°" = 4.94 Say5.0m
vhecked & Vetted
GMa
Associaté Protessor
Civil Engineering Department
Punjab Engineering College
to be University)
@ scanned with OKEN ScannerA) Design of high Ogee overflow spilivay i (As per 15 :6934)
Ogee spillway 1s provided for overflow section of Dam. The design of Ogee
Is based on 1 6934-1998, The profile of Ogee has two quadrants, Upstream and
downstream quadrants. The elliptical downstream quadrants 16 a per
xv + ye =.
AV BY Eqn :- (1)
Value A1,B1 depends upon P/Hd graphs of Fig 2 of IS 6934 : 1998
taking Hd = 4.25 m. for P = 25 = 0.69
HD 4.25
Ay/Hd = =0.25
A, = Hd x 0.25 = 4.25 x 0.25 = 1.063
B/Hd = = 0.146
B, = 0.146 x 4.25 = 0.62
Upstream profile
xe Ye
1.0637 + 0.62” =1 max value of Y; =B; = 0.62
Max value of X; = A; = 0.25 mts
Equation of u/s profile is
Y, = 0.62 ¥ (1 -0.885 X")
Profile of Downstream quadrant is given below:
X85 = Kd" ¥,_;K; is taken from Fig 2 of IS: 6934: 1998 ; Kp = 2.0
x)! = 2.00 x(4.25)"*Y2
X55 = 6.84 Yo
1.85 X,°% = 6.84 dY2
dx,
For a slope of 1:0.6
Max, value of x2 is given by
1.85 X)°* = 6.84 x 1= 11.4
0.6
x = 6.16
ae 8,39m
Hence equation of profile is
x'® = 6.84) Yp = 0.146 X)'*
cked & Vetted
@ scanned with OKEN Scannerbh PROFILE
OGE
DOWN STREAM PROFILE
UP STREAM PROFILE ae
eco
FQuarion(2) arcomtes - a aress) |
eal a 11 (MeTes)
Yee 062 ATOMIEXDY 72 a
. as Yar O16 Ko
xaysterens) | vi qmevens)
00 0.62
| 2 on 0.617
[3 02 0.609 g
{4 03 0.595 [>t
j
; 3
| 4 0.575
| 7 10
| é os 0.547 Tt
7 06 0.512 =
3
8 07 0.467 ry
s os 0.40
r
10 09 0.329
a 1.083 0.00
vy
Aos
u/s '
038 |" ORIGIN FOR
'D/S QUADRANT ee
XL
ORIGIN FOR
U/S QUADRANT
¥2,
Vv
OGEE PROFILE
OGEE PROFILE
@ scanned with OKEN Scannero Foundation of depth.
= 11.82 mvs
scour depth is calculated from Lacey's formula,
(@'s)"” keeping f as 10.99 and q = 11.82 cum/m as calculated above
Assunwng a silt factor of 10.99 m for bed material
= 314m
wnstream cut off shall be provided to cater for
boundary strata exists at site, the above depths
R = 1.35 x (11.627/10.99)"
As per clause 17.1 of IS 6966 upstream and do}
1.0R and 1.25 R (Alluvial reaches) how ever as
will be highly safe
Depth of U/S cut off will
( 1 OR from U/S HFL i.e = 969.04 2.5 + 1.7-3.14 = 970.06 m provide 968.0 m
(i) Max depth of cut off for central pile = 1.5x3.14=4.71m
from DIS HFL = 968.8 + 1.7-4.71 = 965.79 m provide 965.21 m
Depth of d/s scour level off 4.25(d,) = 1.25 R = 1.25 x 3.14 = 3.925m
Level of d/s cut off = 968.8 + 1.7 - 3.925 = 966.57 m provide 966.4
Design of Apron:-
Length of downstream concrete block protection = 1.5 D = 1.5 x 3.14 = 4.71 say 5.0 m length
of with cone. blocks of size 1.0x 1.0x0.60m
Let us provide 0.3m thick rip rap on u/s side
Length of downstream apron = 1.5D = 1.5 x 3.14 = 4.71 m with 5.0 m thickness.
@ scanned with OKEN ScannerJRADIENT BY KHOSLA'S THEORY
CHECKING OF APRON LENGTH, THICKNESS AND EXITE
Total Creep length = 1x24 11.304 2.(969 965.21) + 15.40 + 2(968.8 9664)
S110 758 115.4648 20.88 + 15.4048
418m
Head loss if future pate are installed ata tater stage = 973.2 - 968.8 = 4.4 m
= 4.4 = 0.107 | in 9.33 <1 in5 ok
41,08
Check for thickness of floor with pond storage up to level
t full height i.e at 968.8 mt level, because in
Hydraulic Gradient
Since cistern will be full at times when the reservoir is at
early parts of monsoon some water will flow through spillways or under sluices.
Residual Pressure at D/s end of U/spile = 4.4~2 x 0.107 = 4.186 m.
Residual Pressure at D/s end of Central pile = 4.4 20.88 x 0.107 = 2.16 m.
) = (2,161.94) =0.15 Provided is 0.50 m.
14 14
Residual Pressure at a distance of 7.13 m from start of Cistern = 4.4— 28.
= (1,403-1.94) =Nil Provided is 0.40 m.
14
Thickness required at start of cistern = (P
.01 x 0.107 = 1.403 m.
Thickness required
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner|
LVL.973.95 of non spillway section
|
| MAS Woks 73,2! 3.10
T
|
I
I
|
|
4.20
©
2.45—1—1.75
0.87
/ LVL.965.21 0.80
3.50 1.70 fy 0.90 |
7.78
Non Spillway
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner1 Stability analysts far load Combination under Construction condition | Dam complete but no
water in reservolr and 10 tail water (14 Code 612 ~ 1984)
Section through non spillway portion:
vertical torent in
UNIT — force Lever arm vertical
DISCRIPTION LENGTH WEIGHT =F. WEIGHT (KM) (m) — direction(ktt-mn)
Rectangle 1 12 As 1 25 144 3 432
Tangle -2 1 245 0.5 25 33.69 3.96 133.41
Trlangle 3 1 2A 08 25 33.69 2.036 68.59
Triangle -4 oa? 12 05 25 13.05 7.19 93.83
Base 6.9 12 1 25 207 3.45 T1415
Triangle 6 1.75 244 05 25 53.38 02.28 124.71
Rectangle 7 08 2.44 1 25 48.8 13 63.44
Trlangle 8 0.9 2440 08 25 = 43.92 0.45 19.76
TOTAL 577.53 1646.89
- 2.85
0
0.6 1.15
Hence No tension will occur anywhere in Dam.
Vertical stress = Vo (1 Ge)= 40.03 KN/m? = & = 127.37 KN/m?
8 8
< 272.42 kN/m*
6= 30°
Principal stresses at toe = P minx Sec’®
170.68 KN/m?
Principal stresses at heel =P maxxSec’® = 53.64 KN/m?
Shear stresses at toe =Pminxtand = = 73.62 KN/m?
Shear stresses atheel =Pmaxxtan® = 23.14 KN/m?
@ scanned with OKEN ScannerLVL.973.95 of non spillway section |
1,66 | 1,35 |
LIVE.
}/-—_— 3.69 —— a
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner™
~
~
~
~
~~
»
~
~
~~
J
e
»
2.
e
S
»
»
>
»
»
>
>
>
»
.
.
.
>
>
\F
Case <0
1 Stability analysis for load Combination under Construction condition + Dam complete but no
Section through spillway portion:
vertical Moment in
UNIT force Lever arm vertical
DISCRIPTION LENGTH HEIGHT MF. WEIGHT (KN) (mm) diectlon(kat-m)
e- 1.35 25 1 25 84.38 5.425 457.76
Triangle -2 3.25 25 OS 25 101.56 3.125 317.38
Triangle -3 15 08 1 25 30 05 15
Triangle -4 0.87 1200S 2 © 13.05 7.19 93.83
Base -5 69 1200 OS 25 1038S 3.45, 357.08
Triangle - 6 175 2.44 1 25 106.75 2.28 243.39
Rectangle -7 08 244 0S 25 24.4 13 31.72
Triangle -8 09 2.44 1 25 549 0.45 2471
TOTAL 518.54 1540.87
“X= _ 69 - 2.97 = 048 0 1.5m
FO.p 15 x 88.2
Case -IV
Section through spillway portion reservoir at maximum pond level normal water level:-
vertical Moment
Length( Height = UNIT force Leverarm Direction
DISCRIPTION sm) (m) WEIGHT MF (kN) (m) (ktt-m)
a 1.66 42 10 1 69.72 6.93 483.16
b 1.35 17 10 1 = 22.95 5.425 1245
wt. of water TOTAL= 92.67 607.66
Vt Hore. Horz.
Force Lever [Link] Force Leverarm Moment at
Force (KN) arm (m) (kN-m) (kN) (m) ‘toe (kN-m)
@ scanned with OKEN ScannerPenge eoenadveeeseseseeeeeesereseseseerserrrer
20
’ an ave
ora n7.98 1208.73 maa aaa gs
xo Ml me? let
V ~ 387 98
ee is te 8 11S om
6
heft = ah = 3(_1208.7 ) 2 591 m
w
131.3 kN/m* < ITLAL kN
ett
Factor of safety against overturning,
120873 * an >2
444.53
Factor of safety against sliding
Fe[w-u)tand © _ 387.98 _xtan 40°
‘Op 15x 88.2
2.46 >1.5m
Safety against earthquake (|.S. : 1893 ~ 1984)
Hydrodynamic effect due to reservoir are calculated
P= Ca,
Where P = hydrodynamic pressure KN/m’ at depth y
, = coefficient which varies with shape and depth for vertical section at y/h
© Distance below water surface = 42
Depth of reservoir 42
074
‘ah Design horizontal seismic coefficient = BI ao
Where B = Coefficient depending upon soil foundation system = 1.0 for Dam on hard soils
| = Importance Factor depending upon importance system = 3.0 for Dams.
@ scanned with OKEN Scannerweswvwvevvwvuewewevvvvvevevewvevevevevewvewee sees eee ee
21
igontal selstni
008
res xo.0w oa
ye amitaxt-ofwater © 101/m", 1 2.0 (safe)
367
Factor of safety against sliding
52555 xtanao” = 4.24
103.96
X=M= 1498.67 -367.47 = 215m
v 525.55
e= 1300 2.0(safe)
7285.82
factor of safety against sliding
471s? xtndo" = 4.24
93.34
X=M= 1402.19 -285.82 = 237m
v 471.87
es B-x= 108 1.5 (safe)
851.35
Factor of safety against sliding.
470.68 xtangot = 184
214.91
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner|
e aN
. coe 1800.78 851.95 tam
» , A008
oem 205 >he tay
2 6
aye 1500.8 85195 PAD an
eft 470.08
page DY ae ATO. 2AAy Kn < 4053 Ku/m?
bef 42
casei
etn hough Spilway Reservolr full max uplit pressure no overflow and full selemie frees
from case -1V& tw 387.98 EM, 1208.73
Caevi TH 9334 22.75 BB2 208.29 KN
MM 285.82 39.35 444.53 769.7 KN
et vt force = 38798 x0.91= 353.06 kN
hiet vertical resisting moments= 120873 x0.91= 1099.94 kN
Factor of safety against overturning.
= 1,43 >1.5 (safe)
Factor of safety against slidin
353.05 xtando” = 1.45,
204.29
1099.94 -769.7 = 094m
353.06
> e 251 beff = 3M=3( 1099.9 -7697 ) = 282 m
w 353.06
»
= WW =2 35305 = 250.4 KN/m* < 340,53 kN/m*
J bet 2a
,
»
»
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner[Link] ater Retaining Wall::[Link]
cotwrated back fill from behind
Lan 20x.208 20 KN/M
less tal force * %4x 20% 3.0% 30 KN/m?
(0.1338 fekbd
pars 30430x03= 30KN-m, deff = = 106 min
0.1338 x 30 x 1000
Let us provide D = 275 mm at bottom and 200 mm at top
deff, = 275- 25-5 = 245mm
1.5m,/bd'= 15x 30x 108 = 0.75 from SP-16, pt=0.18, At= 245% 0.18 = 4.4. cm?
1000 x 2457 10
Provide 12mm @ 1.13 x 100 = 25.4 cm c/c
44
Let us provide 12 mm@ 250 c/c.
Check for S.F. = S.F. at ‘ -. at dist. 0.24 m above bottom face:-
(1/3 x 202.76) X%x2.76= 25.4 KN.
d= 235mm
.5x 25.4 x 1000 = 0.162 N/mm*< 0.33 N/mm* hence safe.
1000 x 235
Shear stress
@ scanned with OKEN ScannerRetaining Wall:[Link]
poen of Us
sponated back fil from behind
yon 204 2.75 © 28.0 KN/m?
contal force © 4X 25.0% 3.752 47 kN/m?
max © 0.2388 fekbd?
a7, 275N0.3=S3kNem, deff = 3x15x10 #141 mm
0.1338 x 30 x 1000
et us prowide D = 300 mm at bottom and 200 mm at top
300 - 25-6 = 269 say 26.9mm
1S mJbd"=1.5x 53x 10° = 1.13 from SP-16, pt = 0.275, At= 265x0.27. = 7.16cm!
1000 x 265° 10
Provide 12mm @ 1,13 + 0.785 x 100 = 13.3 cm say @ 13.0 cmc/c
2x7.16
Let us provide 12mm@ 260 c/c. alt. with 10mm @ 260c/c. both eff. @ 130 ¢/c.
(1/3 x 20x 3.481) x%x3.481= 40.4 kN.
d= 260mm
Shear stress = 1.5% 40.4 x1000 = 0.23 N/mm’< 0.33 N/mm’ hence safe.
1000 x 260
@ scanned with OKEN ScannerDeslatl otclstocn Aetalning Wal <4 25.
sonuatodt back fil from bet
po 1/4 (20% 4,25) © 26.3 KA?
shoeontal force © %# 28.34 4.25 © 60-13 KIn?
Mu max 0.1338 fckbd?”
aM: (0.134425 x03 76.7 kiln, deff= (To 7xL EXIF — = 169.3 mm
Ni 0.1328 x 30 x 1000
Lot us provide D ® 350 mm at bottom and 200 mm at top
dof, = 350 20-6 = 324 mm
41.5 m,/bd’ = 1,576.7 x10° = 1.1 from SP-16, pt=0.285, At = 345 x.285 =8.6 cm?
1000 x 324” aan
Provide 12mm @ 1.12 »100 =13.02cme/c.
8.6
Te = 0.38.N/mm?
Check for S.F. =S,F, at ‘d’ i.e, at dist. 0.324 m above bottom face:-
(1/3 x 20 x 3.93) x% x 3.93 = 51.5 kN.
D=310mm
d=310-20-6 = 284mm.
Shear stress = 1.5 x 51.5x1000 =0.27 N/mm? <0.38N/ mm’ hence safe.
E 1000 x 284
Curtail 12mm bars at 2.25 m from top level.
@ scanned with OKEN Scanner28
. preenure OREO ARNE O88 wt er tug
.
iv
Ce © 1600. © Loin 90* 0.5» 0 299
Wen Weondo 18
ponign ot Retaining Wall 4.25.m height above Ground Love,
»
»
»
’
U
,
’
Data
ng Wall 4 26 m
gags and ther restoring moments Ay Width = 0 2349 43/2 = 0.33
Table - 1 Verto! Le
Mt
2s and overturning Moments
Pressure from back ka #033
5] wd | Ka | y_
05 1033] 20]
Upit Forces
T
uplit force is 2.16 m.
uplitforce =Wus 246 x = 275 x 10s 59.4 KNm
Moment about toe Mu = 594 x 1.375 = 81.68 KN-m
We 226.72
EMir= 397.67 KNm
wnet= ZW- EU
Twnet= 226.72 - 594 wi 1b 275
= 167 32
y @Minet= Er - Imo- Mu
39767 - «1209-8168
’ = 18814
y
= eMnet /dwnet
) * 186.14 212m
) 167-32
© bax = 275 + 1412 0263