CHAPTER IV

PRESENTATION, ANALYSIS, AND INTERPRETATION OF DATA

The presentation, analysis and interpretation of the data are divided into two parts, part

one deals with the respondent’s profile in terms of Age, Gender, Civil Status, Tribe Affiliation,

Highest Educational Attainment, Occupation. Part two, would like to know the Correlation of

these Factors as Follows, Family/Peer Environment, Social Environment, Safety and Security,

Health and Facilities, Economics and Livelihood Program.

PART I. THE RESPONDENTS PROFILE

This part of the chapter includes the description of the Age, Gender, Civil Status, Tribe

Affiliation, Highest Educational Attainment, Occupation of the respected respondent.

Table 2: Frequency Distribution of the Respondent According to Socio-Demographic

Profile.
AGE FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE (%)
18 - 20 years old 11 12.2
21- 23 years old 28 31.1
24- 25 years old 9 10.0
25- 30 years old 8 8.9
31-40 years old 18 20.0
40 and above 16 17.8
TOTAL 90 100.0

AGE
18-20 years old
12% 21-23 years old
18%
24-25 years old
25-30 years old
20% 31% 31-40 years old
40 and above
9% 10%
Figure 4. A graph shows the Distribution of the respondent According to their Age.

Table 1 shows that out of ninety (90%) respondents twenty-eight (28) or 31.1% of them

are both in the bracket of age 21- 23 years old followed by, eighteen (18) or 20.0% are in the age

of bracket between 31-40 years old, sixteen (16) or 17.8% are age 40 and above 17.8%, eleven

(11) or 12.2% are in the age of 18 - 20 years old, nine (9) or 10.0% are in the age of 24- 25 years

old. And lastly, the lowest age of the respondent is eight (8) or 8.9%.

According to the findings. Majority of the respondent are at the stage of adulthood which

implies that in between of the age 21- 23 years’ old got the response to the conducted

questionnaires.

Table 3: Frequency Distribution of the Respondent According to their Gender

GENDER FREQUENCY PERCENTAGE

Male 66 73.3
female 26 26.7
TOTAL 90 100

GENDER

28% MALE
FEMALE

72%

Figure 5. A graph shows the Distribution of the respondent According to their Gender.
 Table 2 shows that out of ninety (90) respondents, sixty-six (66) or 73.3% of them are

male, and twenty-six (26) or 26.7% are female.

Findings implies that majority of the respondents are male in the five barangays in

Maranatao, Lanao del Sur as they response to the given questionnaire.

Table 4: Frequency Distribution of the Respondent According to their Civil Status

Civil Status Frequency Percentage (%)

Married 31 34.4
Single 40 44.4
Separated 8 8.9
widow 11 12.2
TOTAL 90 100.0

CIVIL STATUS

16% 12% MARRIED

SINGLE
12% SEPARATED
WIDOW

60%

Figure 6. A graph shows the Distribution of the respondent According to their Civil Status.
Table 3 shows that out of ninety (90) respondents, forty (40) or 44.4% are Single

followed by thirty-one (31) or 34.4% are married, eleven (11) or 12.2% are widow, and lastly.

Eight (8) or 8.9% are separated.

 Findings implies that majority of the respondents has a civil status of Single. On the other

hand, the lowest result is Separated that is according to the given questionnaire.

Table 5: Frequency Distribution of the Respondent According to their Tribes Affiliation.

Tribes Frequency Percentage (%)
Meranaw 83 92.2
Tagalog 2 2.2
Maguindanao 5 5.6
TOTAL 90 100.0

TRIBES AFFILITION
MERANAW
TAGALOG
6%
2%
MAGUINDANAO

92%

Figure 7. A graph shows the Distribution of the respondent According to their Tribe Affiliation.

Table 4 shows that out of ninety (90) respondents, eighty-tree (83) of them or 92.2% are

belong to Meranaw tribe and, five 5 or 5.6% are belong to Maguindanao. Also, two (2) or 2.2 are

the lowest result according to the given questionnaire

In such, Majority of the resident are originated in Barangay Papandayan, Marawi city.

Table 6: Frequency Distribution of the Respondent According to their Educational

Attainment
Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage (%)
Elementary Graduate 2 2.2
Elementary level 2 2.2
High school graduate 4 4.4
High school level 24 26.7
College graduate 9 10.0
College level 49 54.4
TOTAL 90 100.0
 Educational Attainment
Elementary Graduate
2%
2%4% Elemantary level
high school graduate
27% high school level
54%
college graduate
10% college level

Figure 8. Pie graph in Distribution of the respondent According to their Educational Attainment.

Table 5 shows that out of ninety (90) respondents, forty-nine (49) or 54.4% are both in

the College Level while twenty-four or 26.7% of them are High- school level followed by, nine

(9) or 10.0% are College Graduate, four (4) or 4.4 are High school graduate, two (2) or 2.2% are

Elementary Graduate, two (2) or 2.2% are Elementary Level.

Findings shows the strong relationship with regards to their Educational Attainment, and

it leads to how they response to the questionnaire, moreover. Majority of the respondent are

College level while the lowest are Elementary level and Elementary graduate.

Table 7: Frequency Distribution of the Respondent According to their Occupation

Occupation Frequency Percentage (%)

farmers 12 13.3
Business owner/ self- 13 14.4
employed
Government employee 9 10.0
Non- government employee 38 42.2
Student/ housewife 18 20.0
TOTAL 90 100.0
 Sales
18 12
Fisher folks/famers
13 Business owner/ self employee
Government employee
non- government employee
student/ housewife

9
38

Figure 9. A graph shows the Distribution of the respondent According to their Occupation.

Table 6 shows that out of ninety (90) respondents, thirty-eight (38) or 42.2% are non-

government employee followed by, eighteen (18) or 20.0 are student/housewife, thirteen (13) or

14.4% are Business owner/ self-employed, twelve (12) or 13.3 % are fisher folks, and lastly, the

lowest got nine (9) or 10.0%.

Findings shows that majority of the respondent are non-government employee in which

may have the correlation in the study of factors affecting Meranaw community in preserving

cultural heritage in their respective barangay.

PART II. SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT AND ITS IMPACT TO THE
RESIDENTS IN BARANGAY IN PAPANDAYAN MARAWI CITY.
This part of the chapter includes the weighted Mean, Verbal Interpretation, rank as

presented with the factors may involve such as follows; Family Environment, Social

Environment, Safety and Security, Health and Facilities, Economics and Livelihood Program and

to see if there’s a Correlation Analysis between the Demographic Profile of the Respondent.

Table 9: Frequency, Distribution, Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of the

respondents Responses in terms of the Family/Peer Environment.
FAMILY/PEER ENVIRONMENT Mean Verbal RANK
Interpretation
1 Our family is one of the native residents in 2.36 Maybe 3
Papandayan, Marawi City.
2 Our family has been experiencing the 2.67 1
natural calamities in Papandayan, Marawi
city. Yes
3 Household in Papandayan are under 2.34 4.5
supervised by LGU in terms of upcoming
disaster. Maybe
4 Our family’s business is within the 2.42 2
community in Papandayan, Marawi City.
Yes
5 My Friends and I, Grown up in Papandayan, 2.34 Maybe 4.5
Marawi City
Overall Weighted Mean: 2.43 Yes
Legend: 2.40 – 3.00 - “YES”, 1.70 – 2.39 - “Maybe”, 1.00 – 1.69 - “No”

Table 9-A shows the respondents response to the gavin questionnire/survey conducted to

their Barangay randomly and according to it’s one of the factor, out of five questions under the

factor of Family/Peer Environment the highest rank was “Our family has been experiencing the

natural calamities in Papandayan, Marawi city.”, with the mean of (2.67) as to interpret with the

verbal Interpretation (Maybe). However,

 Findings shows that the respondent had casually been experienced the natural calamities

in Barangay Papandayan, Marawi City as a result in Improper garbage disposal in the

community in which the mainstream to protect the environment, deforestation and distraction

had made due to huge garbage in the barangay.

Table 10: Frequency, Distribution, Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of the
respondents Responses in terms of the Social Environment.
SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT Mean Verbal RANK
Interpretation
1 In terms of social environment, the 2.46 Yes 1
community has a good relationship towards
to each other.
2 Papandayan tag or labeled as one of the 2.27 Maybe 2
poorest Barangay in Marawi City because
of the problem in Garbage Disposal.
3 The local Government Unit has regularly 2.18 Maybe 3
supervised the barangay and provide some
assistance program for those who near in
the dumpsite.
4 In terms of social security, the community 2.16 Maybe 4
in Papandayan Marawi City has less secured
due to unorganized garbage disposal.
5 In social status, most of the household in 1.98 Maybe 5
Papandayan belongs to middle class and
lower class.
Overall Weighted Mean: 2.21 Maybe
Legend: 2.40 – 3.00 - “YES”, 1.70 – 2.39 - “Maybe”, 1.00 – 1.69 - “No”

Table 9 shows the respondents response to the gavin questionnire/survey conducted to

their Barangay randomly and according to it’s one of the factor, out of five questions under the

factor of Social Environment the highest rank was “In terms of social environment, the

community has a good relationship towards to each other.” with the weighted mean of (2.46) as

to interpret with the verbal Interpretation (Yes). However,

 Findings shows that the society may affect on our decisions especially we live in modern

society where everything is possible and some of this reason has may connected to our daily

routine by using social media that change how we see the situation into changing what we

thought is right.

Table 11: Frequency, Distribution, Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of the
respondents Responses in terms of the Safety and Security.
SAFETY AND SECURITY Mean Verbal RANK
Interpretation
1 Papandayan is one of the safest barangays Yes
2.40
in marawi city. 1
2 Papandayan has less crimes in entire 2.30 Maybe 2
marawi city.
3 In collaboration with LGU and the residents 2.31 Maybe 3
of Papandayan the implementation of safety
and security provided by the officials has
regularly supervised.
4 BPAT in barangay Papandayan are enough 2.19 Maybe 4
to secure the entire barangay.
5 Barangay officials in Papandayan always 2.18 Maybe 5
securing the safety of the residents in entire
community.
Overall Weighted Mean 2.28 Maybe
Legend: 2.40 – 3.00 - “YES”, 1.70 – 2.39 - “Maybe”, 1.00 – 1.69 - “No”

Table 10 shows the respondents response to the gavin questionnire/survey conducted to their

Barangay randomly and according to it’s one of the factor, out of five questions under the factor

of Safety and Security the highest rank was “Papandayan is one of the safest barangays in

marawi city.” With the weighted mean of (2.40) as to interpret with the verbal Interpretation

(Yes). However,

Findings shows that Barangay Papandayan are one of those safeties barangay in the

Marawi City according to the data result.

Table 12: Frequency, Distribution, Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of the
respondents Responses in terms of the Building and Facilities.
HEALTH AND FACILITIES Mean Verbal RANK
Interpretation
1 Papandayan is one of the safest barangays 2.13 Maybe 5
in marawi city.
2 Papandayan has less crimes in entire 2.29 3
marawi city. Maybe
3 In collaboration with LGU and the residents 2.54 Yes 1
of Papandayan the implementation of safety
and security provided by the officials has
regularly supervised.
4 BPAT in barangay Papandayan are enough 2.49 Yes 2
to secure the entire barangay.
5 Barangay officials in Papandayan always 2.17 Maybe 4
securing the safety of the residents in entire
community.
Overall Weighted Mean: 2.32 Maybe
Legend: 2.40 – 3.00 - “YES”, 1.70 – 2.39 - “Maybe”, 1.00 – 1.69 - “No”

Table 12 shows the respondents response to the gavin questionnire/survey conducted to

their Barangay randomly and according to it’s one of the factor, out of five questions under the

factor of building and facilities the highest rank was “In collaboration with LGU and the

residents of Papandayan the implementation of safety and security provided by the officials has

regularly supervised..” with the weighted mean of (2.54) as to interpret with the verbal

Interpretation (Yes). However,

Findings shows that in building and Facilities most of the residents have the collaborative

effort with the local government unit in implementing the safety and security that are provided

by the LGUs and official.

Table 13: Frequency, Distribution, Weighted Mean and Verbal Interpretation of the
respondents Responses in terms of the Modernization and Preferences.
 ECONOMICS AND LIVELIHOOD PROGRAM Mean Verbal RANK
Interpretation
1 In terms of health, most of the residents has 2.27 Maybe 5
less record of diseases.
2 Barangay Papandayan marawi city has 2.40 Yes 2.5
regularly implemented the Programs in
health awareness.
3 facilities and other equipment are well 2.46 Yes 1
provided by the barangay officials to secure
the health and safety of the community
4 Most of the residents in Papandayan has 2.40 Yes 2.5
been fully vaccinated
5 Barangay Papandayan is one of the less 2.34 Maybe 4
cases in covid-19 pandemic.
Overall Weighted Mean: 2.37 Maybe
Legend: 2.40 – 3.00 - “YES”, 1.70 – 2.39 - “Maybe”, 1.00 – 1.69 - “No”

Table 12 shows the respondents response to the gavin questionnire/survey conducted to

their Barangay randomly and according to it’s one of the factor, out of five questions under the

factor of building and facilities the highest rank was “facilities and other equipment are well

provided by the barangay officials to secure the health and safety of the community.” with the

weighted mean of (2.46) as to interpret with the verbal Interpretation (Yes). However,

Findings shows that all of necessity and other equipment in regards to health and

awareness of the barangay has been provided by the local government unit to secure the capacity

in terms of catering the people to safety measures.

 CHAPTER V
SUMMARY, FINDINGS, CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION

SUMMARY
The study was conducted to find out how may affect the improper waste disposal in the

barangay Papandayan, Marawi City, Lanao del Sur. Certain factors to deliberate the result in

conducting the study such as Family/Peer Environment, Social Environment, Safety and

Security, Health and Facilities, Economic and Livelihood program. This includes ninety (90)

respondents from its respective barangays. However,

The study used the descriptive method of research and the standardized questionnaire- A

Solid Waste Management and Its Impact on the residents in Brangay papandayan, Marawi citty,

Lanao del Sur.In June 15, 2018 the International issues in Improper Garbage disposal are one of

the main social issues that needs to address, Philippines has 3 rd largest contributor to ocean

plastic pollution. this shows that our country has the highest contribution of pollution is waste

management (Delon Porcalla, The Philippin star).

In terms of statistical treatment, simple frequency distribution, percentage computation,

weighted mean, and Persons “Chi square” are used as the basis of gathering information about

the respondent’s profile and their responses for the areas and reasons knowing the answer

between the problem in social issues such as in improper waste disposal and how my affect them

to their basic lives. scaling and interval to get the verbal interpretation.
 Out of clear and sound transparent distribution of questionnaire in the Barangay

Papandayan Marawi city, they were ninety (90) distributed respectively. In total of ninety (90)

expected questionnaire in which it utilized and executed.

FINDINGS

Based on the gathered data, out of ninety (90) respondents:

1. Majority of the respondents age range from 21- 23 years old with the frequency of

twenty-eight (28) or 31.1%

2. Majority of the respondents are male with the frequency of sixty-six (66) or 73.3 %

3. Majority of the respondent, with the civil status of single supported with the data

frequency of forty (40) or 44.4%.

4. Majority of the respondent are belonging to the tribe of Meranaw with the frequency of

eighty-tree (83) or 92.2%

5. Majority of the respondents are belonging to the non-government employee with the

frequency of thirty-eight (38) or 41.2%.

6. Most of the respondent response to the question under the factor of Family/Peer

Environment and out of five (5) question the rank number one (1) was the question of

“Our family has been experiencing the natural calamities in Papandayan, Marawi city.”

with the mean of 2.67 with the verbal interpretation of YES.

7. Most of the respondent response to the question under the factor of Social Environment

and out of five (5) question the rank number one (1) was the question of “In terms of

social environment, the community has a good relationship towards to each other”. With

the mean of 2.46 with the verbal interpretation of YES.

 8. Most of the respondent response to the question under the factor of Safety and Security

and out of five (5) question the rank number one (1) was the question of “Papandayan is

one of the safest barangays in marawi city.”. With the Mean of 2.40% with the verbal

interpretation of YES.

9. Most of the respondent response to the question under the factor of Health and Facilities,

and out of five (5) Gavin question the number 0ne (1) top rank was the question of “In

collaboration with LGU and the residents of Papandayan the implementation of safety

and security provided by the officials has regularly supervised.”. With the Mean of 2.54

with the interpretation of YES.

10. Most of the respondent response to the question under the factor Economic and

Livelihood Program and out of five (5) Gavin question the rank number one (1) was the

question of “facilities and other equipment are well provided by the barangay officials to

secure the health and safety of the community” with the Mean of 2.46 and has a verbal

interpretation of YES.

CONCLUSION

It is therefore concluded that Barngay Papandayan, Marawi city has a vital role in

securing the health and safety of the community in Solid waste Management and its Impact on

residents in Barangay papandayan. At this point, the effects among children, elderly senior

citizen are most vulnerable to diseases that may cause them to their health even their social life

in the community in which my lead them to limit their economic livelihood to sustain their daily

needs such as food, water, and sanitation.

RECOMMENDATION

Based on the findings and the conclusion drawn thereof, the researcher gives the

following recommendations.

1. To the upcoming future researcher who has the same reflective study similar to this case

or study it is highly recommend looking for the other ideas or other factors of the study.

2. To the community in barangay Papandayan we recommend creating an ordinance withing

the barangay as you coordinately to official, leaders in the community to ask further

assistance and knowledge to help the green and clean community.

3. To the officials, LGU (local government unit) the researcher recommends having a at

least have a collaborative effort to stablish a friendly community.

4. In the province of Lanao del Sur, official and authorities. The researcher recommends to

at least have a regularly supervised the situation within the barangay to provide more

assistance on what they need in preserving the nature, green-environment, and a picture

of community in which people are confidently happy to communicate to other people to

build camaraderie and socially aware in their surroundings.

5. Lastly, the researcher has a strong vision to have faith and hope to the community to stay

high and to be grateful that one day the problem in solid waste management will be soon

fine and my address to the authorizes in the city office of Marawi.