Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.
BRILL is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to T'oung Pao.
http://www.jstor.org
BY
SO KEE LONG
I
For the role of commerce in Sung economy, the best account comes from
Shiba Yoshinobu Ag , Sodaishogyoshikenkyiu
1 Atit_r (Tokyo: Kazama
shobo, 1968); "Sung Foreign Trade: Its Scope and Organization," in Morris
Rossabi ed., ChinaAmongEquals, (Berkeley & Los Angeles: University of Califor-
nia Press, 1983), pp. 89-115. For discussion on implication of the economic
progresses in Sung-Yuan China, see Mark Elvin, The Patternof the ChinesePast,
(Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1973); especially part II.
2 For instance, Kuwabara Jitsuzo AfW%M, Ho Juko no jiseki iMwX0M,
3 This
question was first raised by Ch'en Yii-ching in his annotated transla-
tion of Kuwabara's book on P'u Shou-keng. Ch'en gave evidence that overseas
trade in Ch'iian-chou had begun to decline markedly in the early-thirteenth
century, and did not flourish again until the Yuan. Kuwabara Jitsuzo, tr. by
Ch'en Yii-ching t , P'u Shou-kengk'ao MXTW (Peking: Chung-hua shu-chii,
1954), pp. 35-36. Ch'en's remark was however not pursued by others until Doi
Hiroko brought it up again in the 1980s and discussed it in more details. See Doi
Hiroko +RlEi , "Nan-So chuki igo ni okeru Senshu no kaigai boeki
s5J* At : I
AM "6 7'1'1 ," Ochano mizu-shigaku23 (April 1980): 50-66;
"Sodai no Senshu b6eki to soshitsulf~ v9I'IAl VA ," in Nakajima Satoshi
sensei koki kinen jigyo kai ed., Nakajima Satoshi sensei koki kinen ronshu
· ~fi
~~gT^,~1, (Tokyo: Kyfiko shoin, 1981), vol. 2, pp. 289-318. Most
recent account of the recession comes from Li Tung-hua ~-, Ch'iian-chou
yi
wo-kuo chung-ku ti hai-shang chiao-t'ung 7L')l'gl @_J:._ (Taipei:
Hsiieh-sheng
4
shu-chii, 1985), pp. 174-194.
Chen Te-hsiu, Hsi-shan hsien-sheng Chen Wen-chung kung wen-chi
1i1t.XM
_Cx:,, (SPTKCP ed.) 17: 19a/b.
tic view that now, unlike during his former term of office when
things were still somehow controllable, the financial problems of
the prefecture had become so complex that little could be done to
alleviate them.8
There is thus no doubt that the position of government finance in
Ch'iian-chou had been worsening since the beginning of the cen-
tury. And it seems that the problem remained unsolved for the
remainder of the dynasty. Two imperial edicts relating to appoint-
ments of the prefect of Ch'iian-chou can be used to further substan-
tiate this point. The first one issued in 1261 for an official named
Wu Chieh i- .9 After mentioning that the position of prefect was a
difficult one, the edict went on to mention four major problems
within the prefecture. These were: the mix of foreigners and locals,
the powerful local families, the exhaustion of the prefectural trea-
sury and the corruption of local officials. The other edict was issued
for an official named Hu ShenMf ,1O of whom no record is to be
found in gazetteers. This is probably because Hu was appointed
shortly before the collapse of the dynasty, or because for some
reason yet unknown the edict was not acted upon. But it is
noteworthy that the edict stated explicitly that the prefecture still
suffered from serious financial difficulties."
What are the implications of this financial crisis? To answer this
question, we need to determine first what brought the state of the
prefecture's finances to such a position. Financial problems involve
a failure to maintain a balance between revenue and expenditure.
Doi Hiroko is inclined to stress the expenditure factor. Drawing on
the above-mentioned memorial of 1233 by Chen Te-hsiu, she looks
primarily at the effect of the expenditure relating to royal clansmen,
and comes to the conclusion that it was this item that exhausted the
financial resources of Ch'iian-chou.12 Chen of course discusses the
increase in expenditure caused by the royal household, but the
overall argument in his memorial indicates clearly that the deficit
stemmed mainly from a decrease in revenue rather than from a
drastic increase of expenditure. He does confirm that the number of
8
Ibid., 17: la/b.
9 Liu K'e-chuang WIJ%A, Hou-ts'un hsien-shengta-ch'uan-chiXt4tLkit,
(SPTKCP ed.) 62: 52a/b.
10
Ibid., 69: 580b.
1l On the contrary, edicts relating to appointments of the prefect of
Ch'iian-chou in the twelfth century seldom mention any financial difficulties as
such. For instance, see the edict concerning Yen Shih-lu 0i9t, who was in office
in 1189. Lou Yfieh'l1f, Kung-k'ueichiTk4f%,(SPTKCP ed.) 35: 12a.
12
Doi, op. cit., 1980, pp. 60-64.
as a chain-effect resulted from the increasing number of these royal clansmen. See
Doi, op. cit., 1980, pp. 60-64.
is not surprising that the local economy would have had problems
at this time. Another factor pointed out by Chen Te-hsiu, to be
discussed later, was that the revenue from land tax also witnessed a
considerable decrease. This indicates that in addition to the slump
in overseas trade, local agriculture must have been affected by
other problems as well .
2. TheDeclineof OverseasTrade
chou in the 1240s. It comes from another poem by Liu K'e-chuang who was then
serving in the provincial administration in Kuang-chou. The poem started with a
vivid description of the prosperity of the city amid a local festival in the second
lunar month of the year. Following it was a depiction of interest here. It suggested
that there were so many mercantile ships arriving with the monsoon that Kuang-
chou had became reminiscent of the city of Yang-chou, a renowned centre of
foreign traders under the T'ang dynasty. Ibid., 12: 8a. For Liu's term of office in
Kuang-chou, see Kuang-tungt'ung-chih , 1822 ed., 16: 312a/b.
20
For instance, see Chao Ju-kua M&rd , annotated by Feng Ch'eng-chiin
/i74 , Chu-fanchih chiao-chu FHti , (Taipei: Taiwan Shang-wu yin-shu-
kuan, 1970), p. 30-34, n. 7 and p. 47, n. 2; F. Hirth & W.W. Rockhill, ChaoJu-kua:
His Workon the Chineseand Arab Tradein the Twelfthand Thirteenth Centuries,entitled
Chu-fan-chih, (St. Petersburg: The Imperial Academy of Sciences, 1911), p. 36-38.
Hirth & Rockhill however made a minor mistake by saying that information on
grivijaya in the book came primarily from the author's own oral survey. There are
in fact also important passages in the account of Srivijaya taken from Chou
Ch'ii-fei's work. See Chao Ju-kua, p. 13. There is another brief account of the
countries and commodities involved in the overseas trade in Ch'iian-chou which
testifies a flourishing seaport. But it is included in a miscellaneous work prefaced
in 1206. It is thus more likely to have reflected the situation in the twelfth century
when local economic problems were not yet acute. See Chao Yen-wei §d ,
Yiin-luman-ch'ao Mf ', (SKCS ed.), 5: 19b/20a.
27
'.]
Pao-ch'ingssu-ming-chih A.,, (Sung-Yuan ti-fang-chih tsung-shu ed.)
6: 2a/3a. See also Sato Keishiro (ft*fe R, Isuramu shogyo shi no kenkyu
- a- -
7. -1 FWIE, (Kyoto: Dohosha, 1981), pp. 345-346.
28
1612 ed., 24: 30b/32a; Ch'iian-choufu-chih,
Ch'ian-choufu-chih78JIF,ff7, 1763
ed., 73: 17a/18a; Chin-chianghsien-chihE]iI, , 1765 ed., 15: 43a/44b; Fu-chien
fC
t'ung-chih
29
,, 1867 ed., 86: 33a/b.
Sung Hsi 50tii, "Sung-shang tsai Sung-Li mao-yi chung ti kung-hsien
· ~ J37 ~1Rt.,"
.. X Shih-hsiiehhui-k'an 8 (1977): 95-96; Mori Katsumi
5A , Zoku Nisso boeki no kenkyfu [F WA © f,~ (Tokyo: Kokusho kankokai,
1975), pp. 410-412. For details of the Mongol-Koryo conflicts and the latter's
These days, the fields of Hsing-hua have been taken over by rice of a high gluten
content [for wine-making], and there are I know not how many thousands of
piculs of it carried each year to the prefectural capital. The fields of Hsien-yu
county have been used up for sugar cane, and there are I know not how many tens
of thousands ofjars of the stuff transported each year to Huai-nan and Liang-che.
There can be no doubt that sugar cane is an obstacle in the way of rice
cultivation.36
36
Fang Ta-tsungJSM, T'ieh-anchiAVtI, (SKCSCP, Series II) 21: 4b. This
translation is by Mark Elvin, see Elvin, ibid., p. 129.
37 Ch'iian Han-sheng iAi,
"Nan-Sung tao-mi ti sheng-ch'an yii yiin-hsiao
1iX9
fff ) ,g^_," in Chung-kuoching-chi-shih lun-ts'ung m(Hong-
kong: Hsin-ya yen-chiu-so, 1972), vol. 1, pp. 284-291; Shiba, op. cit., 1968, pp.
161-162.
38
39
Fang Ta-tsung, T'ieh-anchi, 20: 13a/16a.
T'ieh-an chi, ch. 33. Cited by Amano Motonosuke X; tt_J, Chugoku
nogyoshikenkyurPii lf iS^E, (Tokyo: Ochanomizu shobo, Revised ed., 1979),
pp. 486-487. I cannot locate this reference in the SKCSCP edition of T'ieh-anchi
Apart from import, it is clear that the region also produced its own
cotton.
Given these increasingly frequent exchanges of specialized pro-
ducts and foodgrains between southern Fukien and other circuits,
there is good reason to believe that domestic trade continued to
flourish. In other words, this would suggest that the commerce in
Ch'iian-chou and its hinterland was turning its emphasis from
overseas trade to domestic trade.
As demand for specialized crops remained high, and rice imports
remained profitable, and investment in overseas trade was becom-
ing less attractive, more resources are likely to have been diverted
into domestic trade. Yet, the commodities involved were primarily
agricultural products. One possible effect of this is a rise of interest
in land investment.
Prior to the thirteenth century, there is evidence that temples in
Ch'iian-chou and its hinterland were holding large quantity of
arable lands, and this facilitated the agricultural specialization
process in the region.40These large temple properties seem to have
remained in existence until the thirteenth century. Behind this
phenomenon, there is likely to have been a relatively low demand
for land. Before the thirteenth century, although land ownership
was a common target for merchants,4' commercial investments
probably still attracted a large part of the wealth derived from the
prosperous trade in Ch'iian-chou. The reason is simply that invest-
ment in commerce often brought much larger profits over a shorter
period of time. There is no direct evidence that people had rela-
tively less incentive for land ownership. But in 1170s, it was
recorded that some local powerful families planned to bid for the
tenancy of some temple fields in Ch'iian-chou, which were aban-
doned by the temples and confiscated by the government as public
property. However, their offer was so low that the tenants who had
previously cultivated the land for the temples could easily offer the
same rental.42This suggests that even the appetite of the rich and
powerful families for land was not very great. It may reflect a lack
to which I have access. For the time of Fang's term of office in Kuang-chou, see
Kuang-tungt'ung-chih,1822 ed., 16: lOa.
40 So, op. cit., pp. 93-95. See also Chikusa Masaaki / "Sodai Fukken
no shakai to jiin#S&Aio fnt-* I ," Toyoshikenkyuz 15: 2, (Oct. 1956): 1-26;
Huang Min-chih Vt , "Sung-tai Fu-chien ti ssu-yiian yu she-hui
IA R RAt+4 ;," Ssuyuiyen 16: 4, (Nov. 1978): 1-30.
41 Shiba, op. cit., 1968, pp. 461-465.
42 Chou Pi-ta W]Zt, Chou Wen-chung-kung ch'ian-chiWZ,O:X'it, (SKCSCP
ed., Series II) 67: 6b.
43 Chen Te-hsiu,
op. cit., 15: 13a/b.
44 Yung-ch'un hsien-chih7-k,l, 1526 ed., 9: 16a. This is a biography of a
Chang-chou prefect named Chuang Hsia Fit of Yung-ch'un origin. Chuang held
the office in 1213. See also Chang-chou fu-chihM'Jl'lfi, 1878 ed., 24: 15b/16a.
Contrary to this, another source-a letter to the Prefect of Chang-chou by a
Neo-Confucian scholar named Ch'en Ch'un ig- in 1211-gives a different pic-
ture. Ch'en states in his letter that six-sevenths, i.e., about 85 per cent, of the
registered farmlands in that prefecture were owned by the temples. See Ch'en
Ch'un, Pei-ch'ita-ch'ian-chiIL'ki~±, (SKCSCP ed., Series IV) 43: 10a/b. But in
another letter to the prefect by the same scholar at approximately the same time,
he gives the proportion of 75 per cent. It thus seems that he did not necessarily
have accurate information concerning temple land holdings, but gave merely an
impressionistic estimate. Moreover, after reading his fierce criticism of the tem-
ples, one cannot but wonder whether he made those statements free of bias and
exaggeration. A more cautious conclusion which can be drawn from Ch'en's
document is that the temples in Chang-chou probably still held large properties
this time. But their decline was just about to begin, as is indicated in Chuang
Hsia's biography.
45 Wen
T'ien-hsiang I7< , Wen-shanhsien-shengch'iian-chi ;L[B t-% ,
(SPTKCPSP ed.) 11: 231a/233a.
4 For a general picture of the monetary system of the Sung dynasty, see P'eng
Hsin-wei 1A' , Chung-kuohuo-pishihF4'IM t, (Shanghai: Shanghai Jen-min
ch'u-pan-she, 1958), Chap. V.
4 Kat6 Shigeshi t , Shina keizaishi kosho ; (Tokyo:
Toyobunko, 1953), v. 2, p. 73. For details of the history of chiao-tzu,see Hino
Kaisabur5 F r 1 "K6shi no hattatsu ni tsuite T+ aRA " Shigaku
zasshi 45: 2 (Feb. 1934): 188-220; 45: 3 (Mar. 1934): 359-384; Chu Ch'i*ff,
"Liang-Sung hsin-yung huo-pi yen-chiu 1i9 4HJW ," Tung-fangtsa-chih35: 5
(Mar. 1938): 25-33; 35: 6 (Mar. 1938): 28-30; P'eng, ibid., pp. 280-290.
Conclusion
From the above discussion, it is clear that the prevailing view that
Ch'iian-chou enjoyed continuous prosperity from Southern Sung to
Yuan needs further qualification. The seaport had lost its leading
economic position on the China coast for almost three quarters of a
century before the Mongol conquest. At the first glance, this