Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SPIEDigitalLibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie
Abstract
The use of the phase shifting interferometric technique is discussed to make quantitative surface profiling
using the Nomarski differential interference microscope. Lateral shift of the Nomarski prism introduces
mutual phase shift between interfering two wavefronts with small amount of shear. Since the analyzed
phase distribution corresponds to the differential of the surface profile under test, integration of the phase
distribution gives the correct surface topography. The procedure for an analysis method and experimental
results are presented.
1. INTRODUCTION
Recently optical methods of measuring the surface roughness have been described by many
th1 Optical scattering techniques are are known as a standard method of evaluating polished
surfaces.1 Interferomethc techniques including the heterodyne method,2 the phase shifting method,3 the
FECO(Fringes of Equal Chromatic Order) method,4 and so on, provides for a new class of surface
roughness measurement techniques. That is noncontact and 2-D.
The Nomarski differential interference microscope5 has been used as an extremely sensitive and
qualitative evaluation tool of surface roughness. Lessor et al described the quantitative surface topography
based on the Nomarski microscope.6'7 As well known, the Nomarski microscope gives us an information
on the surface slope. They integrated one-dimentionally the measured surface slope distribution to obtain 1-
D surface profile.
In the present paper, we present the phase shifting Nomarski microscope system and an algorithm
for calculation 2-D surface shape of the test object.
I(x,y) = I 1 +V co 2k
aX
s+
(1)
SPIE Vol. 1332 Optical Testing and Metrology Ill: Recent Advances in Industrial Optical Inspection (1990)7 525
Downloaded From: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/conference-proceedings-of-spie on 06 Jan 2021
Terms of Use: https://www.spiedigitallibrary.org/terms-of-use
where h(x,y) denotes the surface shape of the object, s an amount of shear and 4 the optical path
difference. The optical path difference is changed by displacing the Nomarski prism along the shear
direction.
Analyzer
Polarizer
Object
Fig.1 Schematic of differential interference microscope.
Since the bias phase is changeable due to the prism movement, then we can use the phase shifting
fringe analysis technique to evaluate of the derivative of the surface shape to the shear direction, that is,
the x-direction. By the same procedure, we obtain the shape derivative in the y-direction. From the
derivatives to the shear directions, we can calculate a 2-D distribution of the surface shape.
prism
Object
526 / SPIE Vol. 1332 Optical Testing and Metrology ill: Recent Advances in Industrial Optical Inspection (1990)
Next, a shape profile for each direction is calculated from the phase distribution corresponding to
the first derivative by numerical spatial integration. This process removes the tilt phase term because the
optical elements tilt to the optical axis is unknown. The final step is a reconstruction of the 2-D object shape
from the two-direction profiles obtained above.
SPIE Vol. 1332 Optical Testing andMetrology Ill: Recent Advances in Industrial Opticalinspection (1990) / 527
J4x,y)= (dx
J ax (2)
and
x,y= 1dy
J ay (3)
Next, a 2-D distribution function is reconstructed by moving each sectional shape for one direction up and
down to fit the central sectional shape of the other direction. The least-square error estimation method can
be used to obtain optimum values of moving up and down.
In the direct least-square error estimation method, the measured 1-D differences of the object shape
with a random noise is fed to a 2-D derivative.
3.3 Measurement example
Figure 4 shows differential interference micrograms with different bias phases. The object under
test is a computer-generated hologram recorded on a photoregist-coated glass plate. Figure 5 shows a
surface shape of the object.
528 / SPIE Vol. 1332 Optical Testing and Metrology ill: Recent Advances in Industrial Optical Inspection (1990)
4. CONCLUSION
We have developed a quantitative differential interference microscope system in which the phase
bias is modified by shifting the Nomarski prism and the phase derivative is estimated by the phase shifting
technique. Finally 2-D phase reconstruction methods from 1-D phase derivatives are presented.
5. ACKNOWLEDEGEMENTS
The authors thank Yoshio Kano of Ricoh Co. for his helpful discussion and support. This research
was partially supported by the Scientific Research Grant-in-Aid from the Ministry of Education, Science
and Culture, and Amada Foundation.
6. REFERNCES
1. H. E. Bennett and J. 0. Porteus, "Relation between surface roughness and specular reflectance at
normal incidence," J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 51, 123(1961).
2. G. E. Sommargren, "Optical Heterodyne Profilometry," Appl. Opt., 20, 610 (1981).
3.
4. J. M. Bennett, "Measurement of the rms Roughness, Autocovariance Function and Other Statistical
Properties ofOptical Surfaces Using a FEW Scanning Interferometer," Appl. Opt., 15, 2705 (1976).
5. M. Francon, Progress in Microscopy, Pergamon Press, p. 199 (1961).
6. D. L. Lessor, J. S. Hartman and R. L. Gordon, "Quantitative surface topography determination by
Nomarski reflection microscopy. I. Theory," J. Opt. Soc. Amer., 69, 357 (1979).
7. J. S. Hartman, R. L. Gordon and D. L. Lessor, "Quantitative surface topography determination by
Nomarski reflection microscopy. 2: Microscope modification, calibration, and planar sample experiments,"
Appl. Opt., 19, 2998 (1980).
8. K. Omura and T. Yatagai, "Phase measuring Ronchi test," Appl. Opt., 27, 523 (1988).
9. D. C. Ghiglia and L. A. Romero, "Direct phase estimation from phase differences using fast elliptic
partial differential equation solvers," Opt. Lett., 14, 1 107 (1989).
529
SPIE Vol. 1332 Optical Testing arid Metrology ill: Recent Advances in Industrial Optical Inspection (1990) /