Leadership and Management Theories within Health and Social care

[Student name]

[Institute name]

[Date]
Table of Contents
Introduction...................................................................................................................... 3

Assessment of Leadership Theories and Management Models.......................................4

Adaptive Leadership.....................................................................................................4

Transformational Leadership........................................................................................6

Human Relations Approach..........................................................................................9

Contingency Approach................................................................................................11

Implications of Various Leadership theories and Management Models in Healthcare. . .14

Implications of Adaptive Theory..................................................................................14

Implications of Transformational Theory.....................................................................17

Implications of Human Relations Approach................................................................20

Implications of Contingency Approach.......................................................................24

Conclusion..................................................................................................................... 27

References.....................................................................................................................28
Introduction
In the dynamic and ever-evolving landscape of healthcare, effective leadership and
management play a pivotal role in ensuring the delivery of high-quality patient care,
promoting staff engagement, and achieving organizational success. The purpose of this
report is to critically assess various leadership and management theories/models
commonly applied in healthcare settings, explore their advantages and disadvantages,
and discuss their implications for healthcare organizations (Anderson et al., 2015).
Additionally, the report will culminate in reflecting the student's preferred leadership
theory and the rationale behind this choice. The assessment of leadership and
management theories/models will encompass a comprehensive review of diverse
approaches employed by healthcare leaders to guide their teams and organizations
towards excellence. The chosen theories/models for evaluation will include Adaptive
Leadership, Transformational Leadership, Human Relations Approach, and Contingency
Approach.

This report will illuminate underlying principles and applications of each theory/model,
shedding light on the specific situations or organizational structures where they would
be most beneficial. Such insights will equip healthcare professionals with valuable
knowledge to leverage the appropriate leadership style based on the unique contexts
they encounter. Furthermore, a thorough examination of the advantages and
disadvantages of the selected theories/models will provide a balanced perspective on
their efficacy and potential drawbacks. Understanding these strengths and weaknesses
will enable leaders and managers to make informed decisions about which approach
aligns best with their organizational goals and values. The implications of these
leadership and management theories/models in healthcare settings will be explored to
understand their impact on organizational culture, employee engagement, patient care,
and overall performance. Considerations will be given to the relevance of each
theory/model in addressing contemporary challenges faced by healthcare organizations,
such as rapid technological advancements, increasing patient expectations, and
workforce diversity.
Assessment of Leadership Theories and Management Models

Adaptive Leadership
Adaptive leadership is a dynamic and contemporary leadership theory that addresses
complex and uncertain situations by promoting change and innovation. In healthcare,
this leadership style focuses on guiding organizations and teams through challenges,
rather than simply providing ready-made solutions. Adaptive leadership is characterized
by its emphasis on mobilizing people to tackle adaptive challenges, which require
fundamental changes in attitudes, behaviors, and approaches (Apenko & Chernobaeva,
2016). Unlike technical challenges, which can be solved using existing knowledge and
expertise, adaptive challenges necessitate exploring new ways of thinking and
responding to unique and unfamiliar situations (Heifetz, Grashow, & Linsky, 2009).
Adaptive leaders encourage the identification of underlying causes of problems and
facilitate collaborative efforts to create innovative solutions. In healthcare settings,
adaptive leadership is particularly valuable due to the ever-changing landscape and the
need for transformative responses to emerging issues (Amirkhanyan et al., 2018).
Adaptive leadership is fundamentally about mobilizing individuals and organizations to
effectively navigate uncharted waters. In the context of healthcare, this approach
involves recognizing that many issues faced by healthcare professionals and
organizations cannot be solved through traditional methods (Alexander, and Randolph,
1985). Instead of relying on predetermined solutions, adaptive leaders encourage
individuals across the healthcare spectrum, including clinicians, administrators, and
nurses, to collaboratively diagnose problems and develop innovative responses. For
instance, during the COVID-19 pandemic, adaptive leadership proved instrumental in
guiding healthcare organizations through unprecedented challenges, such as managing
scarce resources, maintaining staff morale, and rapidly implementing new protocols
(Bagwell, 2020). Adaptive leaders in this context fostered a culture of adaptability,
encouraged experimentation, and supported learning from failures.

Adaptive leadership is most beneficial in organizations with a decentralized structure,

where decision-making is distributed among various levels of staff. This structure
promotes shared governance, empowering frontline workers to actively participate in
problem-solving and decision-making. Adaptive leaders in such organizations empower
their teams to take ownership of challenges and propose innovative solutions.
Moreover, they recognize that solutions to adaptive challenges may emerge from
unexpected sources within the organization (Baker, Irwin and Matthews, 2020).
Consider a hospital facing the challenge of reducing patient wait times while maintaining
high-quality care. An adaptive leader would not impose a predefined solution but rather
engage frontline staff, nurses, and administrators in identifying the root causes of delays
and collectively devising strategies to improve the situation (Ajanaku and Lubbe, 2021).
This inclusive approach not only generates effective solutions but also empowers
stakeholders at all levels to take ownership of the implementation.

Advantages of adaptive leadership are evident in its ability to foster a culture of

resilience and adaptability among staff. Encouraging experimentation and embracing
the lessons learned from failures, adaptive leaders cultivate an environment open to
change and innovation. This approach enhances problem-solving capabilities and
equips the organization to tackle future challenges more effectively (Adams et al.,
2013). Additionally, adaptive leadership promotes collaboration and teamwork by
encouraging team members to contribute their unique perspectives and skills. In
healthcare, where effective interdisciplinary collaboration is critical, this leadership style
can lead to improved patient care outcomes. This approach cultivates a sense of
ownership among nurses, enhancing their commitment to patient-centered care.
Empowered by their role in decision-making, nurses become more invested in the
outcomes of their efforts. Adaptive leadership strengthens the nurse-patient relationship
(Govindarajan, 2016). As nurses are encouraged to think critically and adapt to unique
patient needs, a more tailored and responsive approach to care is developed.
Furthermore, this leadership style stimulates a culture of ongoing professional
development. Adaptive leaders inspire nurses to continuously seek knowledge and
refine their skills to meet evolving challenges (Bailey et al., 2012).

However, adaptive leadership does come with its share of challenges and potential
disadvantages. Firstly, implementing adaptive leadership demands skilled and
emotionally intelligent leaders capable of navigating complex group dynamics and
managing resistance to change. Secondly, the iterative nature of adaptive leadership
may require significant time and resources, which could be perceived as obstacles in
fast-paced healthcare environments (Berta et al., 2005). Thirdly, the experimentation
involved may lead to initial setbacks, which some organizations may find difficult to
tolerate. Lastly, adaptive leadership is most effective in addressing complex,
ambiguous, and long-term challenges. For technical, short-term issues, other leadership
styles may be more appropriate. One challenge lies in striking the right balance
between stability and change (Khan, 2017). In rapidly evolving healthcare
environments, too much change without a solid foundation can lead to instability and
resistance. Additionally, the adaptability required for this leadership style might be
hindered by rigid organizational hierarchies, where decision-making is concentrated at
the top. Moreover, the emphasis on collective problem-solving can lead to delays in
decision-making, which could be detrimental in time-sensitive healthcare scenarios
(Bowles and Bowles, 2000).

Transformational Leadership
Transformational leadership is a prominent leadership theory that emphasizes the
leader's ability to inspire and motivate followers to achieve higher levels of performance
and personal growth (Bass, 1985). Within the complex and evolving landscape of
healthcare, effective leadership is essential for driving positive change and delivering
high-quality patient care. Transformational leadership, a theory pioneered by Bass and
Riggio (2006), is particularly well-suited for healthcare settings. This theory revolves
around leaders who inspire and motivate their teams to surpass individual goals and
work towards a collective vision. In this section, we delve deeper into the application of
transformational leadership in healthcare, elucidating its key components, practical
implications, and potential benefits. In healthcare, this leadership style has gained
recognition for its potential to positively impact patient outcomes and organizational
effectiveness (Belrhiti Giralt and Marchal, 2018).

Transformational leaders in healthcare exhibit charisma, intellectual stimulation,

individualized consideration, and inspirational motivation (Bass, 1985). Charisma
enables leaders to build trust and rapport with their teams, while intellectual stimulation
fosters critical thinking and creativity among followers. Charismatic leaders possess the
ability to captivate and energize their teams, instilling a sense of purpose and shared
mission (Chahal, 2010). These leaders can inspire healthcare professionals, including
nurses, to view their work as meaningful contributions to the well-being of patients and
the community. Intellectual stimulation, another facet of transformational leadership,
encourages critical thinking and innovation among healthcare professionals. Leaders
who promote intellectual stimulation challenge their teams to question assumptions,
explore new solutions, and continuously learn (Contandriopoulos, Perroux, and Duhoux,
2018). This is especially relevant in healthcare, where advancements in medical
technology and treatment modalities necessitate a commitment to ongoing learning and
adaptation. Individualized consideration ensures personalized support and attention to
each team member's needs, and inspirational motivation instills a shared vision that
unites the team towards a common goal (Bass & Riggio, 2006). Inspirational motivation
encompasses the role of transformational leaders as role models and sources of
inspiration. Healthcare professionals often look to their leaders for guidance and ethical
direction. Transformational leaders, by embodying the values and behaviors they wish
to see in their teams, set an example that resonates throughout the organization
(Currie, 2010). This is especially important in healthcare, where ethical decision-making
and patient-centered care is paramount.

Transformational leadership is particularly well-suited for healthcare organizations

facing the challenges of a rapidly changing healthcare landscape. In settings with
evolving medical advancements, technology, and patient care practices,
transformational leaders can inspire their teams to embrace change and innovation
(Dodwad, 2013). With the promotion of a shared vision and fostering a sense of
purpose, transformational leaders help healthcare professionals overcome obstacles
and achieve exceptional patient outcomes (Brewer et al., 2016). Transformational
leadership is most beneficial in organizations that prioritize collaboration and value
employee development. This leadership style is particularly suited to organizations with
a flat or decentralized structure. Such structures facilitate direct communication between
leaders and followers, enabling transformational leaders to engage in individualized
consideration and intellectual stimulation effectively (Doody and Doody, 2012). The
egalitarian nature of these structures aligns with the collaborative and empowering
aspects of transformational leadership. Healthcare settings with interdisciplinary
teamwork can leverage transformational leadership to create an environment where
diverse perspectives are harnessed to drive innovation and enhance patient outcomes.
When implemented in a decentralized organizational structure, it empowers frontline
healthcare workers to take ownership of their roles and responsibilities, leading to
improved patient care experiences (Di Angi, 1989). Furthermore, transformational
leaders thrive in cultures that encourage open communication and feedback, allowing
for a more profound connection with their teams and the establishment of a positive
work environment (Drach‐Zahavy, 2004).

Advantages of transformational leadership include its ability to inspire passion and

commitment among healthcare professionals. Firstly, this leadership style enhances
motivation and engagement among healthcare professionals, including nurses, by
instilling a sense of purpose and aligning their efforts with the organization's overarching
mission. This heightened motivation leads to increased commitment and dedication to
delivering exceptional patient care (Collins et al., 2020). Moreover, transformational
leaders are skilled at identifying and nurturing potential future leaders within their teams,
promoting succession planning and continuity in leadership. Furthermore,
transformational leadership contributes to improved patient outcomes (Dill, Morgan, and
Marshall, 2013). By encouraging innovation and critical thinking, healthcare teams
under transformational leaders actively seek creative solutions to complex medical
challenges. This approach fosters a culture of continuous improvement and encourages
the exploration of new methods and technologies, ultimately benefiting patients. Another
advantage lies in the creation of a positive organizational culture (Echevarria, Patterson,
and Krouse, 2017). Transformational leaders prioritize individual contributions and
promote open communication, fostering an environment where healthcare professionals
feel valued and appreciated. This, in turn, enhances job satisfaction and plays a role in
reducing turnover rates within healthcare organizations (Fiedler, 1971).

However, transformational leadership is not without its challenges. Some leaders may
struggle to balance the focus on individualized consideration with broader organizational
goals. Providing personalized attention to team members while ensuring the
achievement of collective objectives requires careful management (Goniewicz and
Hertelendy, 2023). The charismatic nature of transformational leadership can create a
risk of overreliance on the leader's personality, potentially hindering the development of
a self-sustaining team culture (Giddens, 2018). The emphasis on visionary thinking may
sometimes overshadow the importance of practical and efficient day-to-day operations
(Bass & Riggio, 2006). Another concern is burnout among transformational leaders. The
emotional energy invested in inspiring and motivating teams can lead to exhaustion if
not managed carefully. Striking a balance between enthusiasm and self-care is
essential to prevent burnout (Haeusler, 2010). Resistance to change is another potential
drawback. While transformational leaders advocate for change, some individuals within
the organization might resist it. This resistance can emerge from employees who are
accustomed to established routines and are hesitant to embrace new practices
(Harrison et al., 2021). Transformational leadership also demands significant time and
energy from leaders. The commitment required maintaining high levels of inspiration
and engagement can be challenging, especially in resource-constrained healthcare
settings. Finding the time for individual interactions with team members can be
demanding (Fischer, 2016). Lastly, ethical concerns can arise due to the strong
influence transformational leaders wield. If their values are misaligned with the
organization's principles or if their influence is used inappropriately, it can lead to ethical
dilemmas within the healthcare context (Hutchinson and Jackson, 2013).

Human Relations Approach

The Human Relations Approach is a management model that emerged in the early 20th
century, focusing on the importance of understanding and valuing employees' social and
psychological needs in the workplace (Cartwright, 2023). This management approach
highlights the significance of employee satisfaction and motivation in achieving
organizational goals. It emphasizes the role of managers in creating a supportive work
environment that fosters positive interpersonal relationships, open communication, and
a sense of belonging (Hoffart and Woods, 1996). The Human Relations Approach
places a strong emphasis on recognizing and addressing the psychological and social
needs of employees within organizations. This approach underscores the belief that
satisfied and engaged employees are more likely to be productive, contributing
positively to the organization's overall success (Helfert, 2009). In healthcare settings,
where employee well-being and job satisfaction directly impact patient care, this
approach can be instrumental in cultivating a motivated and engaged workforce. It is
most beneficial in organizations that prioritize employee welfare and recognize the value
of a satisfied and committed workforce and in organizational structures that prioritize
collaboration, teamwork, and open communication (Hinshaw and Atwood, 1983). In
healthcare, particularly in clinical settings where multidisciplinary teams are essential,
the Human Relations Approach fosters an environment of mutual respect and
understanding among diverse professionals. Such structures allow healthcare
professionals, including nurses, to work cohesively, share insights, and collectively
contribute to patient-centered care (Iqbal Fatima and Naveed, 2019). In healthcare,
where stress and burnout are common, this approach can be particularly relevant in
improving staff morale and retention. Moreover, in decentralized organizational
structures, where teams collaborate closely to deliver patient care, this approach can
foster a sense of camaraderie and cooperation among team members (Jennings-
Sanders, 2004).

Advantages of this approach include its potential to enhance employee productivity and
job satisfaction. Managers recognizing and addressing employees' social and emotional
needs, can result in creating a positive work environment that promotes job
engagement and commitment (Kendall-Gallagher and Breslin, 2013). Moreover, the
approach emphasizes two-way communication, allowing employees to voice their
opinions and concerns, which can lead to improved decision-making and employee
empowerment. This participative management style aligns with modern leadership
theories that emphasize collaboration and shared decision-making (Kangas, Kee and
McKee-Waddle, 1999). Human Relations Approach enhances employee motivation and
engagement. Leaders who adopt this approach actively listen to employees' concerns,
address their needs, and involve them in decision-making processes. This heightened
engagement can lead to improved employee performance, better patient experiences,
and ultimately, enhanced organizational outcomes (Laur et al., 2021). Furthermore, this
approach encourages innovation and creativity. By valuing employees' perspectives and
encouraging them to share ideas without fear of reprisal, healthcare organizations can
tap into the collective intelligence of their workforce (Laurent, 2000). This is particularly
advantageous in settings where novel solutions are needed to address complex
healthcare challenges.

However, the Human Relations Approach is not without its criticisms and challenges.
Firstly, critics argue that excessive focus on employee satisfaction may lead to reduced
emphasis on organizational efficiency and productivity (Lavelle, McMahan and Harris,
2009). Striking a balance between employee well-being and organizational goals can be
complex. Secondly, the approach may be less effective in highly hierarchical
organizations where decision-making is centralized and communication flows
predominantly top-down. In such structures, the implementation of this approach may
face resistance and barriers to change (Lamb, 1992). Moreover, the approach's
effectiveness heavily depends on the competencies and attitudes of managers.
Managers must possess strong interpersonal skills, empathy, and emotional intelligence
to effectively understand and address employees' needs (McKimm et al., 2023). In
situations where managers lack these skills or are not supportive, the potential benefits
of this approach may not be fully realized. Leaders need to be skilled in fostering a
culture of open dialogue, as well as balancing the diverse needs and interests of
employees (Mackoff and Triolo, 2008). In healthcare, where the stakes are high and
decisions often need to be made swiftly, finding this balance can be intricate.
Furthermore, the Human Relations Approach might not align seamlessly with all
organizational structures. In hierarchically structured healthcare settings, where clear
chains of command are essential for patient safety and efficient operations, the focus on
open dialogue and collaboration inherent in this approach could pose challenges.
Maintaining necessary lines of authority while fostering a culture of employee
involvement and communication requires careful planning and adaptation (Medley and
Larochelle, 1995). Ethical concerns can also arise from the Human Relations Approach.
While valuing employees' well-being is crucial, leaders must ensure that this focus does
not inadvertently lead to favoritism or unequal treatment (Murphy, 2005). Equal
opportunities and fairness must be maintained, and leaders need to navigate potential
perceptions of bias or preferential treatment.
Contingency Approach
In the contingency approach, management acknowledges that there is no one-size-fits-
all solution to leadership and decision-making. Instead, it recognizes that the most
effective management style depends on the specific context and situation at hand. This
approach suggests that successful leaders are those who can adapt their behaviors and
strategies to suit the unique circumstances they face (Boehe, 2016). In healthcare
organizations, where various factors such as patient demographics, medical specialties,
and regulatory environments vary, the Contingency Approach can be highly relevant in
addressing the complexity of healthcare delivery. In this model, leaders focus on
understanding the specific challenges and opportunities present in their healthcare
setting and adjust their leadership style accordingly. This adaptability is especially
important in healthcare settings where critical decisions can have life-or-death
implications for patients. This approach is most beneficial in situations where there is a
high level of uncertainty and ambiguity. In rapidly changing healthcare environments,
leaders must be flexible in their approach and be able to respond quickly to unforeseen
challenges. Additionally, the Contingency Approach can be effective in healthcare
organizations that operate in diverse cultural contexts, as it allows leaders to tailor their
management style to match the values and norms of the local community (Capaldo and
Messeni Petruzzelli, 2015).

Advantages of this approach include its emphasis on practicality and relevance. When
managers are able to understand the importance of situational factors, they can avoid
rigid and ineffective management practices that may be out of sync with the specific
context. This adaptability allows leaders to capitalize on their strengths and adjust their
behavior to match the needs of their team and the organization (McAdam, Miller, and
McSorley, 2019). Contingency Approach's adaptive nature enables healthcare leaders
to respond effectively to the unique demands of various situations. In healthcare, where
circumstances can change rapidly, leaders who can tailor their approach to match the
context contribute to more informed and timely decisions. For example, in emergency
situations, leaders might adopt a directive leadership style to provide clear guidance
and ensure efficient responses, while in collaborative team-based environments; a
participative approach might encourage engagement and innovation among healthcare
professionals. Moreover, the Contingency Approach fosters a learning-oriented mindset
among leaders, encouraging them to continuously assess and adjust their approaches
based on feedback and outcomes (Kroll, 2015). The Contingency Approach
acknowledges the importance of aligning leadership styles with the competencies and
preferences of team members. In healthcare, where interdisciplinary collaboration is
common, leaders who can adapt their style to fit the expertise and preferences of
different professionals foster a more inclusive and productive work environment. This
not only improves team dynamics but also enhances patient care through cohesive and
collaborative efforts. The Contingency Approach encourages leaders to focus on the
specific goals and objectives of each situation. Evaluating the situational factors and
aligning their leadership style with the desired outcomes, leaders can achieve better
results. For instance, leaders might adopt a transformational leadership style to inspire
innovation when pursuing quality improvement initiatives, or a transactional style to
ensure adherence to standardized procedures during critical patient care tasks.

However, the Contingency Approach is not without its challenges. It requires a deep
understanding of various leadership styles and their potential effectiveness in different
situations. Leaders must possess the knowledge and discernment to determine the best
course of action amidst complex and changing circumstances (McAdam, Miller, and
McSorley, 2019). Implementing this approach may demand more time and effort from
leaders, as they need to continuously assess the environment and adjust their
strategies accordingly. In healthcare settings where time is often limited and critical
decisions are frequent, this adaptability may present practical challenges. Another
potential concern is the need for leadership continuity. Frequent shifts in leadership
style can be disorienting for healthcare teams, potentially leading to confusion or
reduced trust in leadership decisions. Maintaining a balance between adapting to
situations and providing a consistent leadership presence is crucial for effective
healthcare leadership (Capaldo and Messeni Petruzzelli, 2015). The Contingency
Approach might not be universally applicable to all healthcare settings or teams. Certain
healthcare environments, such as those with highly specialized or standardized tasks,
might benefit less from constantly changing leadership styles. In these cases, a
consistent and predictable leadership approach might be more effective in ensuring
adherence to established protocols and guidelines.

The contingency approach does not provide a clear roadmap for leaders in every
situation, which may leave some managers feeling uncertain or hesitant in their
decision-making. In situations with multiple variables and factors to consider, it may be
challenging to identify the optimal approach (Morsiani Bagnasco and Sasso, 2017). This
model also does not provide a clear roadmap for leaders in every situation, which may
leave some managers feeling uncertain or hesitant in their decision-making (Boehe,
2016). In situations with multiple variables and factors to consider, it may be challenging
to identify the optimal approach. Additionally, leaders may face resistance from team
members if they perceive frequent changes in leadership style as inconsistent or lacking
a clear direction (Marshall, 2010). Moreover, relying solely on situational factors might
overlook the importance of consistent leadership values and principles. While
adaptability is crucial, leaders should maintain a core set of ethical principles and
leadership traits that provide stability and guide their actions (Nicholson, Vakharia, and
Erenguc, 2004).

Implications of Various Leadership theories and Management Models in

Healthcare

Implications of Adaptive Theory

Adaptive Leadership, a dynamic and flexible leadership theory, has profound
implications for the healthcare sector and nursing practice. This approach recognizes
the ever-changing nature of healthcare and offers a framework to address complex
challenges, improve patient care, and empower healthcare professionals. Following are
the implications of the adaptive leadership:

1. Navigating Complex Healthcare Challenges:

Adaptive Leadership serves as a valuable approach for navigating the intricate

challenges that healthcare settings, including nursing, often face. This leadership style
focuses on embracing change, fostering innovative problem-solving and promoting
resilience. Adaptive leaders in healthcare acknowledge that complex challenges often
arise from rapidly changing circumstances and uncertainties. They guide their teams to
embrace change rather than resist it (Nissim and Simon, 2021). Cultivating a mindset of
adaptability, nurses become more prepared to tackle unpredictable challenges with a
sense of readiness. Adaptive leaders encourage nurses to be flexible and agile in their
approaches. They empower nurses to adjust strategies and tactics as situations evolve.
This flexibility enables healthcare teams to respond effectively to unexpected
challenges, making timely decisions that align with evolving circumstances.

Adaptive leaders foster a culture of innovative problem-solving. They prompt nurses to

think creatively and explore unconventional solutions when facing complex challenges.
This approach encourages nurses to leverage their expertise and experience to develop
novel strategies for overcoming obstacles. Adaptive leadership encourages
decentralized decision-making (Reeves, Xyrichis and Zwarenstein, 2018). Nurses are
empowered to make decisions based on their immediate context and expertise. This
autonomy enables swift responses to challenges without waiting for hierarchical
approvals, ultimately leading to more agile problem-solving. Adaptive leaders
emphasize learning from experiences. When challenges are encountered, they facilitate
debriefs and discussions to extract lessons and insights. This learning-oriented
approach enables nurses to continuously adapt and refine their strategies based on
feedback and new information. Adaptive leaders guide their teams to consider long-term
implications and outcomes. They discourage hasty responses and instead encourage
nurses to take a holistic view of challenges (Spano-Szekely et al., 2016). This strategic
thinking supports the development of sustainable solutions that address the root causes
of complex issues. Adaptive leaders emphasize the importance of data-driven decision-
making. They encourage nurses to gather and analyze relevant data to inform their
strategies. This evidence-based approach ensures that decisions are well-informed and
aligned with the complexities of the healthcare challenges.

2. Promoting a Culture of Continuous Learning:

Adaptive Leadership serves as a potent catalyst for promoting a culture of continuous

learning within healthcare settings, including nursing. This leadership approach thrives
on embracing change, fostering innovation, and encouraging a mindset that values
ongoing development. Adaptive leaders in healthcare view change as an opportunity for
learning and growth. They help nurses understand that navigating challenges and
adapting to new situations can lead to valuable insights and skills. Reframing change as
a learning experience, adaptive leaders encourage nurses to approach uncertainties
with curiosity and open-mindedness. Adaptive leaders cultivate an environment where
curiosity is celebrated (Nissim and Simon, 2021). They inspire nurses to ask questions,
explore new ideas, and seek out diverse perspectives. This curiosity-driven mindset
fuels a desire for learning and encourages nurses to engage in ongoing self-
improvement.

Adaptive leadership promotes experimentation and innovation. Leaders empower

nurses to try new approaches, even if they carry a certain level of risk. This willingness
to experiment fosters a culture of continuous learning by encouraging nurses to step out
of their comfort zones and explore uncharted territories. Adaptive leaders encourage
nurses to engage in reflective practices. They prompt nurses to assess their
experiences, learn from successes and failures, and extract insights that can inform
future actions (Smith, 2019). Reflective practices contribute to a deeper understanding
of one's own performance and aid in ongoing skill refinement. Collaboration is essential
in healthcare settings, as various professionals work together to ensure comprehensive
patient care. Adaptive Leadership emphasizes interdisciplinary collaboration, a crucial
component of effective healthcare delivery. Adaptive nurse leaders encourage open
communication and collaboration among diverse healthcare professionals, from nurses
and physicians to therapists and administrators. Fostering a collaborative environment,
these leaders ensure that patients receive holistic care that addresses their unique
needs and medical complexities (Woolard, 2018). A culture of continuous learning
requires a safe space where nurses can express their opinions and admit to gaps in
knowledge without fear of judgment. Adaptive leaders create an environment where
mistakes are seen as chances to learn and improve, fostering psychological safety
among nurses.

3. Adapting to Evolving Situations:

This leadership approach focuses on flexibility, resilience, and the capacity to respond
strategically to changing circumstances. Adaptive leaders in healthcare guide their
teams to adopt flexible approaches when confronted with shifting situations. They
emphasize the importance of remaining open to adjusting strategies, processes, and
plans to align with new challenges. This flexibility enables nurses to respond promptly
and effectively to emerging scenarios. Evolving situations often come with uncertainty.
Adaptive leaders encourage nurses to embrace uncertainty as an inherent part of
healthcare dynamics (Apenko and Chernobaeva, 2016). They help nurses develop a
mindset that views uncertainty as an opportunity for growth and learning, rather than a
hindrance. Adaptive leaders empower nurses to make swift decisions when faced with
evolving situations. They emphasize the importance of timely and informed decision-
making, enabling nurses to respond promptly to changing patient needs, emerging
risks, and shifting priorities.

Evolving situations frequently require multi-dimensional solutions. Adaptive leaders

foster a collaborative problem-solving approach, encouraging nurses to collaborate
across disciplines and draw on diverse expertise. This collaborative effort enhances the
collective ability to adapt to complex challenges. Adaptive leaders guide nurses in the
resourceful use of their skills and knowledge to address changing circumstances
(Bagwell, 2020). They prompt nurses to apply their expertise in innovative ways that suit
the evolving needs of patients, promoting a dynamic approach to care delivery. Evolving
situations can be demanding, both physically and emotionally. Adaptive leaders support
nurses in cultivating resilience by providing resources for self-care and stress
management. This resilience enables nurses to withstand the pressures of change and
maintain their performance. Adaptive leaders emphasize transparent communication
during evolving situations. They keep nurses informed about changes, challenges, and
strategies, fostering an environment of trust and alignment. This open communication
ensures that everyone is on the same page and can collectively adapt (Woolard, 2018).

Implications of Transformational Theory

Transformational Leadership, a dynamic leadership theory that emphasizes inspiration,
innovation, and individual growth, holds significant implications for both the healthcare
sector and the field of nursing. This approach has the potential to shape healthcare
organizations, improve patient outcomes, and foster a culture of excellence. Following is
the detail of various implications of the transformational leadership:

1. Enhancing Patient-Centered Care:

Transformational Leadership plays a central role in enhancing patient-centered care

within healthcare settings, particularly in the field of nursing. This leadership approach
focuses on inspiring and empowering healthcare professionals to provide care that
revolves around the unique needs and preferences of each patient (Ferreira et al.,
2020). Transformational leaders in nursing inspire a shared vision of patient-centered
care among the healthcare team. They communicate the importance of treating patients
as individuals with distinct values and preferences. This shared vision motivates nurses
to align their efforts with the goal of delivering the best care experience for patients.

Empathy and compassion are emphasized by transformational leaders. They

encourage nurses to empathize with patients' emotions and provide care with kindness
and respect. This culture of empathy ensures that patient’s feel valued and understood,
fostering a positive care experience. Autonomy and initiative are promoted by
transformational leaders. Nurses are empowered to make decisions that enhance
patient-centered care (Vaismoradi et al., 2016). This autonomy enables nurses to adapt
their care plans to individual patient needs, resulting in personalized care that
addresses patients' unique circumstances. Open communication is a cornerstone of
transformational leadership. Leaders encourage transparent conversations between
nurses, patients, and their families. Effective communication ensures that patients are
well-informed about their conditions, treatment options, and care plans, enabling active
participation in care decisions.

Transformational leaders lead by example in patient-centered care. They model the

behaviors they expect from their team. Observing leaders engage in patient-centered
practices encourages nurses to follow suit, creating a culture of patient-focused care.
Continuous improvement is encouraged by transformational leaders. They challenge
the status quo and motivate nurses to seek better ways of delivering patient-centered
care. This pursuit of innovation aligns care with patients' preferences and evolving
medical practices (Weng et al., 2015). Professional development is a priority for
transformational leaders. They provide training that enhances nurses' ability to provide
patient-centered care. Investing in growth ensures that nurses are prepared to deliver
care responsive to patient needs and medical advancements.

2. Fostering Innovation and Quality Improvement:

Transformational Leadership serves as a dynamic force in fostering innovation and

quality improvement within healthcare settings, with particular significance in nursing.
This leadership approach is grounded in the empowerment and inspiration of healthcare
professionals, driving them to embrace creative thinking, challenge established norms,
and champion continuous enhancements in patient care. Transformational leaders in
nursing take center stage in nurturing a culture that prizes creativity. Their role lies in
igniting the spark of imagination and encouraging nurses to think beyond traditional
solutions (Wang et al., 2018). Fostering an environment that values innovative thinking,
these leaders pave the way for nurses to feel empowered to propose fresh ideas and
contribute to the evolution of care delivery.

A hallmark of Transformational Leadership is its unwavering encouragement of novel

ideas from nursing teams. These leaders actively seek out and embrace the diverse
insights that nurses bring to the table. Through collaborative brainstorming sessions and
open channels of communication, they create a space where nurses feel both
supported and compelled to contribute pioneering solutions to the challenges in patient
care (Collins et al., 2020). Transformational leaders offer a safety net for nurses to
venture into the unknown and experiment in pursuit of quality improvement. They
convey a sense of assurance that even if outcomes diverge from expectations, the
process itself contributes to learning and progress. This assurance emboldens nurses to
explore uncharted territories without trepidation.

Transformational leadership underscores the importance of collaboration that

transcends traditional boundaries. Nurses are prompted to collaborate with
professionals from varied disciplines, fostering a rich exchange of perspectives. Tapping
into the collective wisdom of physicians, therapists, administrators, and others, nurses
can develop holistic and innovative solutions that elevate patient care quality. An
essential aspect of Transformational Leadership is the empowerment of front-line
nurses (Weng et al., 2015). These leaders extend trust and responsibility, inviting
nurses to actively participate in shaping quality improvement initiatives. This
empowerment fuels a sense of ownership and pride among nurses, motivating them to
identify opportunities for enhancement and take the lead in implementing changes that
foster improved patient outcomes.

3. Enhancing Organizational Culture:

Transformational Leadership plays a pivotal role in enhancing organizational culture

within healthcare settings, particularly in nursing. This leadership approach focuses on
inspiring and empowering healthcare professionals to work collaboratively, embrace
shared values, and contribute positively to the overall work environment.
Transformational leaders articulate a compelling vision for the organization's culture and
values. They engage nurses in a collective sense of purpose, aligning their efforts
towards a common goal. Inspiring a shared vision, these leaders foster a sense of unity
and commitment among nurses, which in turn shapes the organizational culture (Wolf
and Floyd, 2017). Transformational leaders prioritize open communication throughout
the organization. They encourage nurses to voice their opinions, ideas, and concerns.
This open dialogue cultivates a culture of transparency and trust, where nurses feel
heard and valued. Improved communication leads to stronger teamwork and a more
positive work environment.

Empowerment is a cornerstone of Transformational Leadership. Leaders encourage

nurses to take ownership of their roles, make decisions, and contribute to the
organization's success. This empowerment fosters a culture of autonomy and
accountability, where nurses feel valued for their expertise and contributions.
Transformational leaders emphasize collaboration and teamwork (Brewer et al., 2016).
They break down silos and encourage interdisciplinary cooperation. This collaborative
approach creates an atmosphere of shared responsibility and mutual support,
enhancing the sense of unity among nurses and contributing to a positive organizational
culture. Transformational leaders acknowledge and celebrate nurses' achievements and
contributions. They highlight excellence and reward exceptional efforts. This recognition
not only boosts nurses' morale but also reinforces the organization's commitment to
fostering a culture of appreciation and positivity. Transformational leaders promote a
culture of continuous improvement. They challenge the status quo and encourage
nurses to seek innovative ways to enhance patient care and processes. This
commitment to growth and progress contributes to a dynamic and forward-thinking
organizational culture. Transformational leaders ensure that their decisions and actions
are in alignment with the organization's core values. This authenticity strengthens the
organization's commitment to its values and establishes a sense of integrity that
permeates the organizational culture (Weng et al., 2015).

Implications of Human Relations Approach

The Human Relations Approach, a management model emphasizing interpersonal
relationships, communication, and employee well-being, holds profound implications for
the healthcare sector and nursing practice. This approach recognizes that successful
healthcare delivery is not solely dependent on technical skills, but also on effective
teamwork, motivation, and a positive work environment. Following is a detailed overview
of the potential implications of Human Relations Approach:

1. Fostering Positive Nurse-Patient Relationships:

One of the central implications of the Human Relations Approach in healthcare and
nursing is its focus on fostering positive nurse-patient relationships. This approach
emphasizes effective communication, active listening, and empathy. In nursing, building
strong connections with patients is vital for delivering holistic care. Nurses who embrace
the Human Relations Approach establish rapport with patients, ensuring that patients
feel heard, understood, and involved in their care decisions (Cartwright, 2023). This
results in improved patient satisfaction, compliance, and overall well-being. Moreover,
the Human Relations Approach encourages nurses to consider the emotional aspect of
patient care. Nurses who adopt this approach recognize that patients are not just
medical cases but individuals with unique emotions, fears, and preferences.
Demonstrating empathy and compassion, nurses create a safe space for patients to
share their concerns openly. This creates a nurturing environment that supports
patients' emotional well-being while facilitating a deeper understanding of their medical
needs (Boehe, 2016). Communication lies at the heart of the Human Relations
Approach's impact on nurse-patient relationships. Nurses who prioritize this approach
ensure that their communication is clear, transparent, and jargon-free. They engage in
active listening, paying attention to both verbal and nonverbal cues. This approach
enables nurses to address patients' questions and concerns effectively, alleviating
anxieties and empowering patients to actively participate in their care decisions.

2. Promoting Collaborative Teamwork:

The Human Relations Approach has significant implications for promoting collaborative
teamwork within healthcare settings. In nursing, where interdisciplinary collaboration is
essential for comprehensive patient care, this approach encourages open
communication among diverse healthcare professionals. Nurses, physicians, therapists,
and support staff collaborate seamlessly, sharing information and insights that
contribute to better patient outcomes (Procter et al., 2013). The emphasis on
interpersonal relationships ensures that teams work cohesively to address complex
healthcare challenges. Central to the Human Relations Approach is the emphasis on
open communication. Nurses and healthcare professionals who adopt this approach
actively engage in transparent and frequent communication with their colleagues
(Fischer, 2016). They share information, insights, and concerns openly, ensuring that
everyone is well-informed about patient needs, care plans, and any challenges that may
arise. This communication fosters a sense of unity and ensures that all team members
are on the same page (Papathanasiou et al., 2015)

Furthermore, the Human Relations Approach encourages healthcare professionals to

recognize and value the contributions of their colleagues. In nursing, this translates to
acknowledging the expertise of nurses, physicians, therapists, and support staff.
Appreciating each team member's unique skills and insights, a collaborative
environment emerges where individuals feel valued and motivated to contribute their
best efforts (Ramalingam et al., 2020). The approach also promotes a culture of mutual
respect. Nurses who embrace the Human Relations Approach treat their colleagues as
equals, regardless of their roles or titles. This respect extends beyond professional
boundaries, creating an environment where all team members feel comfortable
expressing their opinions and sharing their ideas (Khan, 2017). This inclusivity
contributes to a sense of belonging and encourages individuals to contribute their
diverse perspectives.

3. Enhancing Employee Job Satisfaction:

The Human Relations Approach holds substantial potential in enhancing employee job
satisfaction within healthcare settings, including the nursing profession. This approach
places a strong emphasis on recognizing employees as valuable assets, valuing their
contributions, and creating a supportive work environment that ultimately leads to higher
levels of job satisfaction. Central to the Human Relations Approach is the idea of
recognizing and appreciating individual employees. In nursing, this means
acknowledging the unique skills, dedication, and efforts of nurses (Reinhardt, Leon and
Summers, 2022). Leaders who adopt this approach take the time to express genuine
gratitude for nurses' contributions to patient care and the overall functioning of the
healthcare team. Such recognition fosters a sense of value and belonging, positively
impacting nurses' job satisfaction (Nissim & Simon, 2017). Moreover, the Human
Relations Approach focuses on empowering employees by involving them in decision-
making processes. In nursing, this translates to soliciting nurses' input on matters that
affect their work, patient care, and the overall functioning of the healthcare unit. When
nurses' opinions are valued and considered, they feel a greater sense of ownership over
their roles and responsibilities, which in turn enhance their job satisfaction (Santra and
Alat, 2022).

The approach also prioritizes open and effective communication. Nurse leaders who
embrace the Human Relations Approach ensure that communication channels are clear,
transparent, and accessible. Nurses who receive timely and relevant information about
changes in policies, procedures, or patient care plans feel more informed and
empowered (Stefl, 2008). This open communication leads to increased job satisfaction
as nurses experience a stronger sense of engagement and involvement in their work.
Furthermore, the Human Relations Approach recognizes the importance of work-life
balance. Nurse leaders who prioritize this approach ensure that nurses' well-being is a
central consideration. They strive to create flexible schedules, provide opportunities for
breaks, and offer support to nurses facing personal or professional challenges (Trastek
et al., 2014). This recognition of nurses' needs outside of work contributes to their
overall job satisfaction and reduces burnout. The approach also encourages
professional development. In nursing, continuous learning is crucial for staying updated
on medical advancements and enhancing patient care (Reeves et al., 2018). Nurse
leaders who adopt this approach provide opportunities for nurses to attend workshops,
pursue certifications, and engage in skill-building activities. This investment in nurses'
growth demonstrates a commitment to their professional advancement, boosting their
job satisfaction (Tomey, 2009). Additionally, the Human Relations Approach emphasizes
creating a positive work environment. Nurse leaders who prioritize this approach
promote a culture of mutual respect, collaboration, and support among team members.
Nurses who work in such an environment are more likely to experience job satisfaction
as they feel a strong sense of camaraderie, reduced workplace stress, and the
knowledge that their contributions are valued.

Implications of Contingency Approach

The Contingency Approach, a management model that advocates tailoring leadership
and management practices to fit specific circumstances, has significant implications
within healthcare settings, particularly in nursing. This approach recognizes that there is
no one-size-fits-all solution and that the most effective strategies depend on the unique
context.

1. Contextual Decision-Making:

The Contingency Approach plays a crucial role in enhancing contextual decision-making

within healthcare settings, including nursing. This approach emphasizes that decisions
should be tailored to fit specific circumstances and that there is no universal solution
that applies to all situations (Boehe, 2016). The Contingency Approach requires
healthcare professionals, including nurses, to assess various situational variables
before making decisions. This involves considering factors such as patient conditions,
available resources, team capabilities, and the overall healthcare environment.
Thoroughly understanding the context, nurses can make informed decisions that are
more likely to yield positive outcomes (Traynor and Rafferty, 1999). Contextual decision-
making involves efficient resource allocation. Nurses need to determine how to allocate
resources such as time, staffing, and medical supplies based on the specific situation
(Capaldo and Messeni Petruzzelli, 2015). The Contingency Approach guides nurses in
prioritizing resource allocation to address the most critical needs. When making
decisions, nurses must evaluate potential risks and take measures to mitigate them.
The Contingency Approach encourages nurses to identify potential challenges and tailor
their decisions to minimize risks. For example, nurses might adjust patient care plans
based on the patient's medical history and potential complications.

2. Customized Patient Care:

The Contingency Approach plays a pivotal role in facilitating customized patient care
within healthcare settings, particularly in nursing. This approach acknowledges that
each patient's needs, conditions, and circumstances are unique, and as such, care
strategies should be tailored to fit those individual requirements (Terzioglu, 2006). The
Contingency Approach encourages nurses to develop individualized care plans for each
patient. Instead of relying on standardized protocols, nurses assess the patient's
medical history, current condition, preferences, and other relevant factors to create a
care plan that addresses their specific needs. Healthcare situations often require a
variety of treatment options (McAdam, Miller and McSorley, 2019). The Contingency
Approach prompts nurses to select interventions that are most suitable for the patient's
condition and circumstances. This customization ensures that treatments align with the
patient's unique requirements. Customized patient care involves effective
communication that takes into account the patient's preferences and understanding.
The Contingency Approach guides nurses to adapt their communication style, language,
and explanations to match the patient's background, culture, and level of health literacy.

Customized patient care is built upon trust and rapport between nurses and patients.
The Contingency Approach underscores the importance of establishing a strong nurse-
patient relationship (Reeves et al., 2018). Nurses invest time in getting to know patients
personally, building trust, and understanding their unique needs and concerns. Nurses
using the Contingency Approach make decisions based on a thorough understanding of
the patient's medical history, current conditions, and personal preferences. This
informed decision-making ensures that patients receive treatments and interventions
that are aligned with their specific circumstances. The Contingency Approach
encourages collaboration among healthcare professionals and patients. Nurses work
together with the patient, their families, and other members of the healthcare team to
create a care plan that takes into consideration the patient's preferences and unique
circumstances. Healthcare settings often involve patients from diverse backgrounds and
conditions (Smith, 2019). The Contingency Approach prompts nurses to consider
cultural, social, and individual differences when providing care. This ensures that care
plans are respectful of each patient's unique background. Customized patient care aims
to achieve specific outcomes that are meaningful to the patient. The Contingency
Approach guides nurses in setting goals that are tailored to the patient's priorities,
leading to care that is focused on achieving the patient's desired outcomes. Customized
care involves continuous monitoring and adaptation (Zinn et al., 2007). The
Contingency Approach encourages nurses to regularly assess the patient's progress,
evaluate the effectiveness of interventions, and adjust the care plan as needed to
ensure optimal outcomes (Boehe, 2016).

3. Effective Resource Utilization:

The Contingency Approach plays a pivotal role in promoting effective resource

utilization within healthcare settings, including nursing. This approach recognizes that
resource allocation should be tailored to the specific needs and circumstances of each
situation. The Contingency Approach calls for allocating resources based on the context
of the situation. Nurses assess the specific requirements, challenges, and goals before
deciding how to distribute resources such as staffing, time, equipment, and supplies.
Healthcare environments often involve competing priorities (Capaldo and Messeni
Petruzzelli, 2015). The Contingency Approach guides nurses to allocate resources in a
way that balances the needs of different patients, tasks, and departments, ensuring that
critical areas receive appropriate attention. The approach recognizes that staffing needs
can vary widely. Nurses adjust staffing levels based on patient acuity, workload, and the
complexity of cases. This ensures that the right number of healthcare professionals is
available to address patient needs effectively.
Effective resource utilization includes optimizing time management. Nurses using the
Contingency Approach allocate time according to the urgency and importance of tasks,
ensuring that critical activities receive adequate attention. Evolving situations demand
flexible resource allocation. The Contingency Approach empowers nurses to reallocate
resources as circumstances change. This adaptability ensures that resources are
aligned with the evolving needs of patients and the healthcare environment. Customized
resource allocation minimizes waste and redundancy. Nurses consider what is truly
necessary for each patient and situation, avoiding overutilization of resources and
unnecessary expenses (McAdam, Miller and McSorley, 2019). Resource utilization is
closely tied to patient care plans. Nurses using the Contingency Approach align
resources with personalized care plans, ensuring that interventions are tailored to each
patient's specific needs and goals. Resource utilization also involves aligning
interventions with patient preferences. The Contingency Approach prompts nurses to
consider what resources are most valuable to the patient's well-being and experience.
Tailoring resource allocation, the Contingency Approach contributes to cost-efficiency.
Nurses allocate resources where they are most needed, avoiding wasteful spending
and promoting effective utilization (Reeves et al., 2018). The Contingency Approach
emphasizes ongoing evaluation of resource utilization. Nurses regularly assess the
effectiveness of resource allocation and make adjustments based on feedback and
changing circumstances.

Conclusion
The exploration of leadership theories and management models within the context of
healthcare and nursing reveals a rich tapestry of strategies to navigate the complex
landscape of patient care and organizational dynamics. Adaptive Leadership emerges
as a guiding light, ushering healthcare professionals into an era of responsive and agile
management, enabling them to thrive amidst uncertainty and change. Transformational
Leadership follows closely, with its emphasis on empowering teams, fostering
innovation, and elevating patient-centered care to new heights. The Human Relations
Approach offers a foundation for nurturing positive relationships, collaboration, and
employee satisfaction, vital for the harmonious functioning of healthcare teams. Lastly,
the Contingency Approach demonstrates the art of strategic adaptation; illustrating the
importance of context and tailored decision-making to provide customized care and
optimize resource allocation. Within the healthcare ecosystem, these theories and
models are not standalone entities but rather interconnected facets of effective
leadership and management. Their implications ripple across diverse domains, from
fostering innovation and patient-centered care to promoting collaboration, navigating
challenges, and enhancing organizational culture. These theories provide healthcare
leaders with a diverse toolkit to cultivate an environment where patients receive
individualized care, interdisciplinary teams flourish, and the organization's performance
is optimized.

As we journey through the dynamic realm of healthcare, these theories guide us in

embracing change, harnessing innovation, and placing patients at the heart of our
endeavors. They beckon us to cultivate resilient, adaptable leadership that thrives
amidst complexity, that empowers and inspires those under its guidance, and that
continually seeks the betterment of patient outcomes and the healthcare landscape as a
whole. In the pursuit of excellence, these theories offer both a compass and a canvas,
inviting us to craft a future where leadership transforms challenges into opportunities
and where every patient receives the finest care possible.

References
Apenko, S. and Chernobaeva, G., 2016, April. The influence of complex adaptive
leadership on the efficiency of business management. In International
Conference on Management, Leadership & Governance (p. 17). Academic
Conferences International Limited.
Anderson, R.A., Bailey Jr, D.E., Wu, B., Corazzini, K., McConnell, E.S., Thygeson, N.M.
and Docherty, S.L., 2015. Adaptive leadership framework for chronic illness:
framing a research agenda for transforming care delivery. ANS. Advances in
nursing science, 38(2), p.83.

Amirkhanyan, A.A., Meier, K.J., O’Toole Jr, L.J., Dakhwe, M.A. and Janzen, S., 2018.
Management and performance in US nursing homes. Journal of Public
Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), pp.33-49.

Alexander, J.W. and Randolph, W.A., 1985. The fit between technology and structure as
a predictor of performance in nursing subunits. Academy of Management
Journal, 28(4), pp.844-859.

Ajanaku, O.J. and Lubbe, W., 2021. Applying transformational leadership in nursing
through the lens of Kouzes and Posner leadership practices. Gender and
Behaviour, 19(2), pp.17788-17794.

Adams, J.A., Bailey Jr, D.E., Anderson, R.A. and Thygeson, M., 2013. Finding your way
through EOL challenges in the ICU using Adaptive Leadership behaviours: A
qualitative descriptive case study. Intensive and Critical Care Nursing, 29(6),
pp.329-336.

Brewer, C.S., Kovner, C.T., Djukic, M., Fatehi, F., Greene, W., Chacko, T.P. and Yang,
Y., 2016. Impact of transformational leadership on nurse work outcomes. Journal
of advanced nursing, 72(11), pp.2879-2893.

Bagwell, J., 2020. Leading through a pandemic: Adaptive leadership and purposeful
action. Journal of School Administration Research and Development, 5, pp.30-
34.

Baker, E.L., Irwin, R. and Matthews, G., 2020. Thoughts on adaptive leadership in a
challenging time. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 26(4),
pp.378-379.

Boehe, D.M., 2016. Supervisory styles: A contingency framework. Studies in Higher

Education, 41(3), pp.399-414.
Bass, B.M., 1985. Leadership: Good, better, best. Organizational dynamics, 13(3),
pp.26-40.

Bass, B.M. and Riggio, R.E., 2006. Transformational leadership.

Bailey Jr, D.E., Docherty, S.L., Adams, J.A., Carthron, D.L., Corazzini, K., Day, J.R.,
Neglia, E., Thygeson, M. and Anderson, R.A., 2012. Studying the clinical
encounter with the Adaptive Leadership framework. Journal of healthcare
leadership, pp.83-91.

Berta, W., Teare, G.F., Gilbart, E., Ginsburg, L.S., Lemieux-Charles, L., Davis, D. and
Rappolt, S., 2005. The contingencies of organizational learning in long-term care:
factors that affect innovation adoption. Health Care Management Review, 30(4),
pp.282-292.

Bowles, A. and Bowles, N.B., 2000. A comparative study of transformational leadership

in nursing development units and conventional clinical settings. Journal of
nursing management, 8(2), pp.69-76.

Belrhiti, Z., Giralt, A.N. and Marchal, B., 2018. Complex leadership in healthcare: a
scoping review. International journal of health policy and management, 7(12),
p.1073.

Chahal, H., 2010. Two component customer relationship management model for
healthcare services. Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 20(4),
pp.343-365.

Contandriopoulos, D., Perroux, M. and Duhoux, A., 2018. Formalisation and

subordination: a contingency theory approach to optimising primary care
teams. BMJ open, 8(11), p.e025007.

Currie, K., 2010. Succession planning for advanced nursing practice; contingency or
continuity? The Scottish experience. Journal of healthcare leadership, pp.17-24.

Cartwright, A., 2023. Human relations and hospital care. Taylor & Francis.
Collins, E., Owen, P., Digan, J. and Dunn, F., 2020. Applying transformational leadership
in nursing practice. Nurs Stand, 35(5), pp.59-66.

Capaldo, A. and Messeni Petruzzelli, A., 2015. Origins of knowledge and innovation in
R&D alliances: a contingency approach. Technology Analysis & Strategic
Management, 27(4), pp.461-483.

Dodwad, S.S., 2013. Quality management in healthcare. Indian journal of public

health, 57(3), pp.138-143.

Doody, O. and Doody, C.M., 2012. Transformational leadership in nursing

practice. British journal of nursing, 21(20), pp.1212-1218.

Di Angi, P.R., 1989. Nursing decentralization: A contingency model of assessment. Case

Western Reserve University (Health Sciences).

Drach‐Zahavy, A., 2004. Primary nurses’ performance: role of supportive

management. Journal of advanced nursing, 45(1), pp.7-16.

Dill, J.S., Morgan, J.C. and Marshall, V.W., 2013. Contingency, employment intentions,
and retention of vulnerable low-wage workers: An examination of nursing
assistants in nursing homes. The Gerontologist, 53(2), pp.222-234.

Echevarria, I.M., Patterson, B.J. and Krouse, A., 2017. Predictors of transformational
leadership of nurse managers. Journal of nursing management, 25(3), pp.167-
175.

Fiedler, F.E., 1971. Validation and extension of the contingency model of leadership
effectiveness: A review of empirical findings. Psychological bulletin, 76(2), p.128

Fischer, S.A., 2016. Transformational leadership in nursing: a concept analysis. Journal

of advanced nursing, 72(11), pp.2644-2653.

Ferreira, V.B., Amestoy, S.C., Silva, G.T.R.D., Trindade, L.D.L., Santos, I.A.R.D. and
Varanda, P.A.G., 2020. Transformational leadership in nursing practice:
Challenges and strategies. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 73.
Goniewicz, K. and Hertelendy, A.J., 2023. Adaptive Leadership in a Post-Pandemic
World: The Urgent Need for Transformative Change. Prehospital and Disaster
Medicine, pp.1-2.

Giddens, J., 2018. Transformational leadership: What every nursing dean should
know. Journal of Professional Nursing, 34(2), pp.117-121.

Govindarajan, V., 2016. Adaptive leadership 101. Leader to Leader, 2016(81), pp.42-46.

Heifetz, R.A., Grashow, A. and Linsky, M., 2009. The practice of adaptive leadership:
Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard business
press.

Haeusler, J.M.C., 2010. Medicine needs adaptive leadership. Physician

Executive, 36(2), p.12.

Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R.L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S. and Le-
Dao, H., 2021. Where do models for change management, improvement and
implementation meet? A systematic review of the applications of change
management models in healthcare. Journal of healthcare leadership, pp.85-108.

Hutchinson, M. and Jackson, D., 2013. Transformational leadership in nursing: towards

a more critical interpretation. Nursing inquiry, 20(1), pp.11-22.

Hoffart, N. and Woods, C.Q., 1996. Elements of a nursing professional practice

model. Journal of professional nursing, 12(6), pp.354-364.

Helfert, M., 2009. Challenges of business processes management in healthcare:

Experience in the Irish healthcare sector. Business Process Management
Journal, 15(6), pp.937-952.

Hinshaw, A.S. and Atwood, J.R., 1983. Nursing staff turnover, stress, and satisfaction:
Models, measures, and management. Annual review of nursing research, 1(1),
pp.133-153.
Iqbal, K., Fatima, T. and Naveed, M., 2019. The impact of transformational leadership
on nurses’ organizational commitment: a multiple mediation model. European
Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(1), pp.262-275.

Jennings-Sanders, A., 2004. Teaching disaster nursing by utilizing the Jennings disaster
nursing management model. Nurse education in practice, 4(1), pp.69-76.

Khan, N., 2017. Adaptive or transactional leadership in current higher education: A brief
comparison. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed
Learning, 18(3), pp.178-183.

Kroll, A., 2015. Exploring the link between performance information use and
organizational performance: A contingency approach. Public Performance &
Management Review, 39(1), pp.7-32.

Kendall-Gallagher, D. and Breslin, E., 2013. Developing DNP students as adaptive

leaders: A key strategy in transforming health care. Journal of Professional
Nursing, 29(5), pp.259-263.

Kangas, S., Kee, C.C. and McKee-Waddle, R., 1999. Organizational factors, nurses' job
satisfaction, and patient satisfaction with nursing care. JONA: The Journal of
Nursing Administration, 29(1), pp.32-42.

Laur, C.V., Agarwal, P., Mukerji, G., Goulbourne, E., Baranek, H., Pus, L., Bhatia, R.S.,
Martin, D. and Bhattacharyya, O., 2021. Building health services in a rapidly
changing landscape: lessons in adaptive leadership and pivots in a COVID-19
remote monitoring program. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(1),
p.e25507.

Laurent, C.L., 2000. A nursing theory for nursing leadership. Journal of Nursing
Management, 8(2), pp.83-87.

Lavelle, J.J., McMahan, G.C. and Harris, C.M., 2009. Fairness in human resource
management, social exchange relationships, and citizenship behavior: Testing
linkages of the target similarity model among nurses in the United States. The
International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(12), pp.2419-2434.
Lamb, G.S., 1992. Conceptual and methodological issues in nurse case management
research. Advances in Nursing Science, 15(2), pp.16-24.

McAdam, R., Miller, K. and McSorley, C., 2019. Towards a contingency theory
perspective of quality management in enabling strategic alignment. International
Journal of Production Economics, 207, pp.195-209.

McKimm, J., Ramani, S., Forrest, K., Bishop, J., Findyartini, A., Mills, C., Hassanien, M.,
Al-Hayani, A., Jones, P., Nadarajah, V.D. and Radu, G., 2023. Adaptive
leadership during challenging times: Effective strategies for health professions
educators: AMEE Guide No. 148. Medical teacher, 45(2), pp.128-138.

Mackoff, B.L. and Triolo, P.K., 2008. Why do nurse managers stay? Building a model of
engagement: part 2, cultures of engagement. JONA: The Journal of Nursing
Administration, 38(4), pp.166-171.

Medley, F. and Larochelle, D.R., 1995. Transformational leadership and job

satisfaction. Nursing management, 26(9), p.64JJ.

Murphy, L., 2005. Transformational leadership: a cascading chain reaction. Journal of

nursing management, 13(2), pp.128-136.

Morsiani, G., Bagnasco, A. and Sasso, L., 2017. How staff nurses perceive the impact
of nurse managers’ leadership style in terms of job satisfaction: a mixed method
study. Journal of nursing management, 25(2), pp.119-128.

Marshall, E.S., 2010. Transformational leadership in nursing: From expert clinician to

influential leader. springer publishing company.

Nicholson, L., Vakharia, A.J. and Erenguc, S.S., 2004. Outsourcing inventory
management decisions in healthcare: Models and application. European journal
of operational research, 154(1), pp.271-290.

Nissim, Y. and Simon, E., 2021. Flattening the hierarchy curve: Adaptive leadership
during the Covid-19 pandemic-A case study in an academic teacher training
college. Rev. Eur. Stud., 13, p.103.
Procter, S., Wilson, P.M., Brooks, F. and Kendall, S., 2013. Success and failure in
integrated models of nursing for long term conditions: multiple case studies of
whole systems. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 50(5), pp.632-643.

Papathanasiou, I.V., Tsaras, K., Neroliatsiou, A. and Roupa, A., 2015. Stress: Concepts,
theoretical models and nursing interventions. American Journal of Nursing
Science, 4(2-1), pp.45-50.

Reeves, S., Xyrichis, A. and Zwarenstein, M., 2018. Teamwork, collaboration,

coordination, and networking: Why we need to distinguish between different
types of interprofessional practice. Journal of interprofessional care, 32(1), pp.1-
3.

Ramalingam, B., Nabarro, D., Oqubuy, A., Carnall, D. and Wild, L., 2020. Principles to
guide adaptive leadership. Harvard Business Review.

Reinhardt, A.C., Leon, T.G. and Summers, L.O., 2022. The Transformational Leader in
Nursing Practice–an approach to retain nursing staff. Administrative Issues
Journal, 12(1), p.2.

Santra, S. and Alat, P., 2022. Adaptive leadership of doctors during COVID-
19. Leadership in health services, 35(2), pp.246-266.

Stefl, M.E., 2008. Common competencies for all healthcare managers: the healthcare
leadership alliance model. Journal of healthcare management, 53(6).

Spano-Szekely, L., Griffin, M.T.Q., Clavelle, J. and Fitzpatrick, J.J., 2016. Emotional
intelligence and transformational leadership in nurse managers. The Journal of
nursing administration, 46(2), pp.101-108.

Smith, M.C., 2019. Nursing theories and nursing practice. FA Davis.

Trastek, V.F., Hamilton, N.W. and Niles, E.E., 2014, March. Leadership models in health
care—a case for servant leadership. In Mayo Clinic Proceedings (Vol. 89, No. 3,
pp. 374-381). Elsevier.
Tomey, A.M., 2009. Nursing leadership and management effects work
environments. Journal of nursing management, 17(1), pp.15-25.

Traynor, M. and Rafferty, A.M., 1999. Nurse education in an international context: The
contribution of contingency. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 36(1),
pp.85-91.

Terzioglu, F., 2006. The perceived problem‐solving ability of nurse managers. Journal of
nursing management, 14(5), pp.340-347.

Vaismoradi, M., Griffiths, P., Turunen, H. and Jordan, S., 2016. Transformational
leadership in nursing and medication safety education: a discussion
paper. Journal of nursing management, 24(7), pp.970-980.

Woolard, N.A., 2018. Rethinking management group projects with the adaptive
leadership model: The lesson is the process. Journal of Education for
Business, 93(8), pp.392-402.

Weng, R.H., Huang, C.Y., Chen, L.M. and Chang, L.Y., 2015. Exploring the impact of
transformational leadership on nurse innovation behaviour: A cross‐sectional
study. Journal of nursing management, 23(4), pp.427-439.

Wang, L., Tao, H., Bowers, B.J., Brown, R. and Zhang, Y., 2018. When nurse emotional
intelligence matters: How transformational leadership influences intent to
stay. Journal of nursing management, 26(4), pp.358-365.

Wolf, C. and Floyd, S.W., 2017. Strategic planning research: Toward a theory-driven
agenda. Journal of management, 43(6), pp.1754-1788.

Zinn, J., Mor, V., Feng, Z. and Intrator, O., 2007. The performance impact of nursing
home innovation: A contingency perspective. In Strategic Thinking and
Entrepreneurial Action in the Health Care Industry (Vol. 6, pp. 217-236). Emerald
Group Publishing Limited.