National Highways Authority of India
aera (Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, Government of India)
3-5 WH 6, BHeT-10, arc, vi fel - 110 075 # G-5 & 6, Sector-10, Dwarka, Now Delhi-t10075
‘FPY/Phone : 91-11-25074100 / 25074200
ada uss Usart oifeact
(ae oRaet She ast sare, aR AH) oy
NHAI/Policy Guidelines/ Procurement/2023
Policy Circular No.9.1.16/2023 dated 215 December, 2023
(Decision taken on E-Office File No. NHAV/CMD/QualifiedBidder/2022 (Comp. No. 149957)
Sub: List of Provisionally Qualified Bidders for HAM Projects to avoid repetitive
examination of biding documents by Technical Divisions - reg.
A Bidder normally submits bids for civil works for different projects. The Technical
Capacity & Financial Capacity of the same bidder is being assessed for each project by
Technical Divisions which consumes a lot of energy and time.
2. In order to avoid repetitive examination of bids, the pre-qualification done in case
of HAM projects for which bids were received, during the period from 01.10.2022 to
30.09.2023, have been taken into consideration. The relevant documents were obtained
from the concerned Financial Consultants,
3. Accordingly, lists of provisionally technically qualified bidders for HAM Projects have
been prepared and the same are attached at List A and List B with following details:
(i) The List A contains Technical Capacity (EPC) upto which a bidder is eligible
on the basis of assessment made earlier by Technical Divisions for the bids
received during the period from 01.07.2023 to 30.09.2023 (containing
technical score of last five years starting from 2018-19 to 2022-23) .
(ii) The list B contains Technical Capacity (EPC) upto which a bidder is eligible
on the basis of assessment made earlier by Technical Divisions for the bids
received during the period from 01.10.2022 to 30.06.2023 (containing
technical score of last five years starting from 2017-18 to 2021-22). As per
Clause 2.2.2, technical capacity is determined for the last five years,
therefore, for determining technical score for the current year 2023-24, the
technical score of 2017-18 has been excluded.
(iii) A particular bidder is eligible for the EPC mentioned against its respective
name. However, if there is specific span/ special eligibility requirement in
the project under bidding, the same needs to be evaluated from the bid
received.
(iv) Both the lists shall remain valid upto 30.06.2024.
4. __ Inview of above, to hasten the process of evaluation, Technical Division may assess
the bids without referring to Annex-ll, Ill & IV of Appendix-IA of RFP for HAM Projects for
the bidders mentioned in List A (Part I) and without referring to Annex Il & IV of Appendix:
A of RFP for HAM Projects for the bidders mentioned at list A (Part Il) and list B, if the
Estimated Project Cost of the subject project is less than or equal to the Estimated Project
Cost declared in the list of Provisionally Qualified Bidders, and for rest of the criterion,
bids shall be assessed by the Technical Divisions as, per requirement of the RFP.
Contd...2/-Re
Further, it is mentioned that these lists are not applicable for Standalone specialized Projects,
therefore, Technical Division are required to carry out complete evaluation in such cases.
5. This issues with the approval of Competent Authority.
Encl
As stated above pwr
(Sanjay Kumar Patel)
General Manager (Coord.)
To:
All Officers of NHAI HQ/ ROs/ PIUs/ CMUs/ Site Offices
Copy to:
1. Hindi Division for translation in Hindi.
2. Library for hosting the circular on library site.
3. Web Admin for circulation.List A
Part-I- Provisionally Technically Qualified Bidders: Technical Capacity (EPC)
upto which the Bidder is eligible as per assessment made earlier by NHAI Technical
Divisions for the bids received during the period from 01.07.2023 to 30.09.2023
pertaining to HAM Projects
s. Eligible for Estimated ae
No, | Nameofthedidder | Project Costupt0 | (oy ge hai of which provisional eligi
aie Ce of the bidder has been determined)
= aa 4/6 laning of Bhaniyawala-Jollygrant
1 ce eee jects (P) 565.59 Rishikesh Km. 0.000 to Km 19.780 in the
a Sateof UK on HAM
4/6 laning of Bhaniyawala-Jollygrant
2, | Samdaii Batol | sassy | Reem O00 token 10 nthe
a Sate of UK on HAM,
Tete
1. The aforementioned Bidders are eligible for the EPC mentioned above against their respective
names. However, if there is a specific span/ special eligibility requirement in the project under
bidding, the same needs to be evaluated from the Bid submitted by the Bidders.
2, Please note the above list is not applicable for Standalone specialized Projects, therefore,
the complete evaluation in such cases shall be carried out based on the bids submitted.
3. The Technical Division may assess the bid without referring to Annex Il & IV of Appendix
Us for HAM Projects if the Estimated Project Cost of the subject project is less or equal the
Estimated Project Cost declared in the list of Provisionally Technically Qualified Bidders, and for
the rest criteria the bid shall be assessed by the Technical Divisions as per the requirement of
the RFP,
Page 1 of 2List A
Part-II - Provisionally Technically Qualified Bidders: Technical Capacity (EPC)
upto which the Bidder is eligible as per assessment made earlier by NHAI Technical
Divisions for the bids received during the period from 01.07.2023 to 30.09.2023
pertaining to HAM Projects
a Bligile for Estimated | Name of the Project
26, | Samara | UPR EnE He | ea wh vi
5 ince ofthe bidder has been determined)
4/6 laning of Bhaniyawala-Jollygrant
hy [Reet eoas 565.59 Rishikesh Km. 0,000 to Km 19.780 in the
® state of UK on HAM.
Note:
1. The aforementioned Bidders are eligible for the EPC mentioned above against their respective
names, However, if there is a specific span/ special eligibility requirement in the project under
bidding, the same needs to be evaluated from the Bid submitted by the Bidders.
2. Please note the above list is not applicable for Standalone specialized Projects, therefore,
the complete evaluation in such cases shall be carried out based on the bids submitted.
3. The Technical Division may assess the bid without referring to Annex-Il & IV of Appendix-IA,
for HAM Projects if the Estimated Project Cost of the subject project is less or equal the
Estimated Project Cost declared in the list of Provisionally Technically Qualified Bidders, and for
the rest criteria the bid shall be assessed by the Technical Divisions as per the requirement of
the RFP,
Page 2 of 2List B
Provisionally Technically Qualified Bidders: Technical Capacity (EPC) upto
which the Bidder is eligible as per assessment made earlier by NHAI Technical
Divisions for the bids received during the period from 01.10.2022 to 30.06.2023,
pertaining to HAM Projects
No.
Name of the Bidder
Eligible for Estimated
Project Cost upto (Rs.
incr.)
Dinesh Chandra R Agarwal
Infracon Private Ltd
1359.71
Name of the Project
(on the bass of which provisional eligibility of
thebidderhas beendetermined) |
4 laning of Devinagar Bypass (End) (Existing
Km. 208.000 to Kasganj Bypass (End)
{Existing Km.150.100) n the State of UP on
HAM.
APCO Infratech (P) Ltd,
1359.71
| 4 laning of Devinagar Bypass (End) (Existing
Km. 208.000 to Kasganj Bypass (End)
(Existing Km.150.100) n the State of UP on
HAM.
GR infraprojects Limited
1359.71
4 laning of Devinagar Bypass (End) (Existing
Km. 208.000 to Kasganj Bypass (End)
(Existing Km.150.100) n the State of UP on
HAM.
HG Infra Engineering
Limited
1359.71
Four laning of NH 530B from Devinagar
Bypass (End) (Existing Km. 208.000 of NH
530B/Design Km. 66.000) to Kasganj Bypass
(End) (Existing Km.150.100 of NH 5308/
Design Km, 123.100) in the State of Uttar
Pradesh on HAM mode
Oriental Structures
Engineers Pvt Ltd.
1359.71
4 laning of Devinagar Bypass (End) (Existing
Km. 208.000 to Kasganj Bypass (End)
(Existing Km.150.100) n the State of UP on
HAM.
IRB infrastructure
Developers Limited
1358.71
4 laning of Devinagar Bypass (End) (Existing
Km. 208,000 to Kasganj Bypass (End)
(Existing Km.150.100) n the State of UP on
HAM.
Montecarlo Limited
1359.71
4 laning of Devinagar Bypass (End) (Existing
Km. 208.000 to Kasganj Bypass (End)
(Existing Km.150.100) n the State of UP on
HAM.
Page 1 of 7Name of the Project
(on the basis of which provisional eligibility of
the bidder has been determined)
4 laning of Devinagar Bypass (End) (Existing
Km. 208.000 to Kasganj Bypass (End)
(Existing Km.150.100) n the State of UP on
HAM,
4 laning of Devinagar Bypass (End) (Existing
Km. 208.000 to Kasganj Bypass (End)
(Existing Km.150.100) n the State of UP on
HAM,
Construction of 6-lane Greenfield Varanasi-
Ranchi-Kolkata Highway km 288,600 to km
325.500 under Bharatmala in the State of
Jharkhand on HAM (Pkg 11)
Construction of 4 - Laning Kadapa (Junction
with Kadapa Bypass Road) to Chinna
Orampadu— (Pkg-1)_ on HAM under
Bharatmala in state of AP
Construction of 4 - Laning Kadapa (Junction
with Kadapa Bypass Road) to Chinna
Orampadu —(Pkg-1)_ on HAM under
Bharatmala in state of AP
Construction of 4 - Laning Kadapa (Junction
with Kadapa Bypass Road) to Chinna
Orampadu —(Pkg-1) on HAM under
Bharatmala in state of AP
a Eligible for Estimated
* | ame of the Bidder | Project Cost upto (Rs.
No.
in Cr.)
| Gawar Construction ae
Limited
9 | KcCBuildcon (P) Ltd 1359.71
10 | Ceigall india Limited 1329.86
11 | Dilip Buildcon urd 1245.66
| 12. | kwr constructions Limited 1285.66
Megha Engineering &
13° | infrastructures Limited aoa
Lakshmi infrastructure &
14 | developers india Put. Ltd. pee
15 | CDS infra Projects Limited 1215.02
Construction of 4 - Laning Kadapa (Junction
with Kadapa Bypass Road) to Chinna
Orampadu—(Pkg-1) on HAM under
Bharatmala in state of AP
4 laning from Kasganj Bypass End (Existing
Km, 150.100) to Chandan Nagar (Existing Km
96.200) in the State of UP on HAM. ~ Pkg 3
Page 2 of 7Ss.
No.
Name of the Bidder
Project Cost upto (Rs.
ince)
Name of the Project
(on the basis of which provisional eligibility of
the bidder has been determined)
16
Brij Gopal Construction
Co. Pvt. Ltd
1215.02
4 laning from Kasganj Bypass End (Existing
Km, 150.100 } to Chandan Nagar (Existing Km
96.200) inthe State of UP on HAM. Pkg 3
7
Barbrik Project Limited
1186.00
Construction of 6-lane Greenfield Varanasi-
Ranchi-Kolkata Highway km 253.000 to km
288.600 under Bharatmala in the State of
Jharkhand on HAM (Pkg 10)
18,
MG Contractors Pvt Ltd
1160.02
4-Laning of Behsuma - Bijnor Section
(Existing chainage 39/240) to. (Existing
chainage 89/590) in the State of UP on HAM
under Bharatmala
19
NNKC Projects Private
Limited
160,02
4-Laning of Behsuma - Bijnor Section
(Existing chainage 39/240) to (Existing
chainage 89/590) in the State of UP on HAM
under Bharatmala
20
Kalyan Toll infrastructure
Limited
1113.08
4 laning of Boregaon Buzurg to Shahpur
section Km. 139,000 to Km. 186.000 under
Bharatmala in the State of MP on HAM.
21
Adani Enterprises Limited
1113.08
4 Ianing of Boregaon Buzurg to Shahpur
section Km. 139.000 to Km. 186.000 under
Bharatmala in the State of MP on HAM.
22
Prakash Asphaltings And
Toll Highways India Ita.
1113.08,
4 laning of Boregaon Buzurg to Shahpur
section Km, 139.000 to km. 186.000 under
Bharatmala in the State of MP on HAM
23
Kalthia Engineering &
Construction Limited
1113.08
4 laning of Boregaon Buzurg to Shahpur
section Km. 139,000 to Km. 186.000 under
Bharatmala in the State of MP on HAM
24
| Ravitnfrabuild Projects
Pvt td
1083.45
Construction of 4/6 lane Bypass for Belagavi
city km 11.773 to km, 46.253 in the State of
Karnataka on HAM Pkg 1
Page 3 of 7Name of the Bidder
Eligible for Estimated
Project Cost upto (Rs.
incr)
Name of the Project.
(on the basis of which provisional eligibility of
the bidder has been determined)
25
Raj Corporation Ltd.
978.88
4-Laning of MP/UP Border to Kabrai section
km 197.000 to km 242.991 (Sagar-Kabrai
Package-5) under Bharat Mala in the State of
UP on HAM
26
Bansal Construction
Works Private Limited
978.88
4-Laning of MP/UP Border to Kabrai section
km 197.000 to km 242.991 (Sagar-Kabrai
Package-5) under Bharat Mala in the State of
UP on HAM
27
VRC Constructions (I) Pvt
La.
969.8
4 Laning of Abohar Existing Km. 49+070 to
Fazilka Existing Km. 80#655 and
Construction of New 4-lanes Greenfield
highway of Abohar bypass Existing Km
'58+230 Existing Km 42+305, Abohar - Fazilka
Road on HAM in the state of Punjab under
Bharatmala
28
JM Mbatre Infra Pvt. Ltd
961.47
6 laning of Surat — Nashik ~Ahmednagar —
Solapur—MH/KNT Border Greenfield stretch
[Pkg -XIV from km $12,000 (Hasapur) to km
548.400 (Badadal)] in the State of
Maharashtra to be executed on HAM under
Bharatmala
29
Chetak Enterprises Limited
940.18
4-taning of Phagwara to Hoshiarpur road
including Phagwara & Hoshiarpur Bypass
under Bharatmala from Ch. -0.600 to Ch.
46,902 & Ch. 7.780 to Ch. 8.900, in the State
of Punjab on HAM
30
Bekem Infra Projects Pvt.
Ld.
881.57
Construction of 4 lane Access Controlled
New Greenfield Highway Section
(Mancherial ~ Warangal) from Puttapaka
village at to Pangidipalle village under Other
Economic Corridor programme as part of
Nagpur — Vijayawada Corridor on HAM in the
state of Telangana (Pkg!)
31
Krishna Constellation
Private Limited
871.96
Construction of 4 laning of Bakarpur-
Manikpur road km 0+00) and terminating at
SH-74 near manikpur (38+814) under
Bharatmala on HAM in the state of Bihar
Page 4 of 7Name of the Project
(on the basis of which provisional eligibility of
Construction of 4 laning of Bakarpur-
Manikpur road km 0+00) and terminating at
SH-74 near manikpur (38+814) under
Bharatmala on HAM in the state of Bihar
Construction of 6-lane Greenfield Varanasi
Ranchi-Kolkata Highway (Km. 04000 to Km.
27+000) under Bharatmala in the states of
T
4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from in
Belgaum —Hungund — Raichur in the State of
4 Lane with Paved Shoulders from in
Belgaum - Hungund — Raichur in the State of
4 Laning of Raghogarh Existing Ch. 294555 to
Nanasa Existing Ch. 95+000) under
Bharatmala Phase | in the State of MP on
Construction of (i) 41ane highway from
Vidisha to Hinotiya km 0+000 to Km 274000
(Vidisha ~ Mehulwa- Talbehat Pkg-!)
(i) @taning of Vidisha— to
Morikori from Km 39+000 to 59+476 under
Bharatmala in the State of MP on HAM
Rehabilitation and Up gradation from 4 to 8
laning of Chandikhole - Paradip from
Km.60.000 to Km.76.646 (Pkg - 4) in the
: Eligible for Estimated
No. Name of the Bidder Project Cost upto (Rs.
ace) the bidder has been determined)
RKO Construction Private
32 pean 871.96
gg | PNCInfratech Ut, 868.91
UP and Bihar on HAM
shankaranarayana
34 | Constructions Private 836.65
Limited Karnataka on HAM (Pkg-S)
35 Patel nas 823.85
pi Karnataka on HAM
Shreeji Infrastructure India
36 ne 814.43
HAM
37 Ashok Buildcon Ltd. 787.86,
38. | Rail Vikas Nigam Limited 7738
| State of Odisha on HAM
a |
39. | KM Projects Limited 704.34
Construction of 4-Lane Access Controlled
Greenfield Highway section (Warangal-
Khammam under other Economic Corridor
(NH(O)) programme on HAM in the State of
Telangana (Pkg-II).
Page 5 of 7No.
Name of the Bidder
Eligible for Estimated
Project Cost upto (Rs.
in Cr.)
Name of the Project
{on the basis of which provisional eligibility of
‘the bidder has been determined)
40
VBD Projects Pvt. Ltd
704.34
Construction of 4-Lane Access Controlled
Greenfield Highway section (Warangal-
Khammam under other Economic Corridor
(NH(O}) programme on HAM in the State of
Telangana (Pkgull).
41
RR Constructions &
Infrastructure
684.03
4 Laning existing km 346.300 to km 39.380 of
‘Anantapur ~ Muchukota section on HAM, in
the state of AP.
42
SRC Infra Developers
684.03
4 Laning existing km 346.300 to km 39.380 of
Anantapur ~ Muchukota section on HAM, in
the state of AP.
43
Raj Path Infracon Pvt. Ltd.
675.15
| Development of 6-Lane Access Controlled
Greenfield Highway from Vankarakunta (Ch.
454700) to Odulapalle (Ch, 724000)
Bengaluru ~ Vijayawada on HAM under
Bharatmala in the State of AP (Pkg-3)
44
Ramalingam Construction
Company Pvt Ltd
662.83
Construction of access controlled 4 laning
with paved shoulder from Mysore to
Kushalnagara to Srirangapatna bypass near
Paschima Vahini in the state of Karnataka
(Pkg-V).
45,
Ram Kumar Contractor
Private Limited
615.13
| construction of 6-lane Greenfield Ambala
Ring Road starting from junction with
ShamliAmbala under Bharatmala in the
State of Haryana on HAM,
46
M/S NSPR Constructions
India (P) Ltd
594.1
Development of 6-Lane Access Controlled
Greenfield Highway from Kodur (Ch. 0+000)
to Vanavolu (Ch. 24+300) Bengaluru -
Vijayawada Economie Corridor on HAM
under Bharatmala in the State of AP (Pkg-1)
Page 6 of 7Name of the Bidder
Project Cost upto (Rs.
incr.)
‘Name of the Project
(on the basis of which provisional eligibility of
the hidder has been determined)
a7
Rajendra Singh Bhamboo
Infra (P) Utd.
594.1
Development of 6-Lane Access Controlled
Greenfield Highway from Kodur (Ch. 0+000)
to Vanavolu (Ch. 24+300) Bengaluru —
Vijayawada Economic Corridor on HAM
under Bharatmala in the State of AP (Pkg-1)
48.
RNS Infrastructure Limited
589.5
Construction of access controlled 4 laning
with paved shoulder from Mysore to
Kushalnagara on HAM in the state of
Karnataka (Pkg-III)
49
Bharat Constructions
(india) Pvt. Ltd,
568.42
Development of Rudrapur Bypass in the
State of Uttarakhand on HAM
50
Dhariwal Buildtech
Limited
484.54
Rehabilitation, Up-gradation and
Construction of 2 Lane with paved Shoulder
of Selected road stretches from Bakaur to
Parsarma Section-I Parsarma to Bariyahi
Section-II, Bangaon Bypass Section-Ill &
Mahishi Spur Road Section IV under BRT
Scheme Bharatmala in the state of Bihar on
HAM
51
Nirmal Build infra Private
Limited
357.42
Rehabilitation and Upgradation of Chorma~
Bairgania to 2 lane with paved shoulders in
the state of Bihar on HAM
Note:
1. The aforementioned Bidders are eligible for the EPC mentioned above against theit respective names.
However, if there is a specific span/ special eligibility requirement in the project under bidding, the same
needs to be evaluated from the Bid submitted by the Bidders,
2. Please note the above list is not applicable for Standalone specialized Projects, therefore, the complete
‘evaluation in such cases shall be carried out based on the bids submitted.
3, The Technical Division may assess the bid without referring to Annex-II & IV of Appendix-IA for
HAM Projects if the Estimated Project Cost of the subject project is less or equal the Estimated Project
Cost dectared in the list of Provisionally Technically Qualified Bidders, and for the rest criteria the bid
shall be assessed by the Technical Divisions as per the requirement of the REP.
Page 7 of 7