Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Child Survivor Healing Developmental Trauma An
The Child Survivor Healing Developmental Trauma An
net/publication/352732459
CITATIONS READS
3 2,802
1 author:
Joyanna Silberg
Sheppard and Enoch Pratt Hospital
49 PUBLICATIONS 543 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE
All content following this page was uploaded by Joyanna Silberg on 27 December 2021.
Second Edition
Joyanna L. Silberg
Second edition published 2022
by Routledge
605 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10158
and by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon, OX14 4RN
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2022 Joyanna L. Silberg
The right of Joyanna L. Silberg to be identified as author of this work has been
asserted by her in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright, Designs
and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or
utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now
known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any
information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the
publishers.
First edition published 2012 by Routledge
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered
trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without
intent to infringe.
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
A catalog record for this title has been requested
ISBN: 978-1-138-04476-0 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-1-138-04479-1 (pbk)
ISBN: 978-1-351-04886-6 (ebk)
Typeset in New Baskerville
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
For Ayla Rose, Judah Samson, Eden Maya, Levi Noah,
Ezra Ronen, Cora Sydney, and the promise of healthy
children and a healthy society in which to raise them
Contents
List of Tables ix
List of Figures xi
Acknowledgments xiii
Preface xv
Introduction xxi
3 Diagnostic Considerations 39
References 315
Appendices 339
Index 348
Tables
their patience and attention to detail, which made editing this time around
more seamless. I am deeply grateful for the friendship, knowledge, edi-
torial skill, and scholarship of my cherished colleague Stephanie Dallam,
without whom this project would have been impossible.
I would like to thank the many brilliant trauma clinicians all over the
world who have invited me to teach and learn with them in Canada, Aus-
tralia, Sweden, Estonia, Finland, Norway, Scotland, England, Northern
Ireland, Germany, Spain, the Netherlands, New Zealand, and Israel. Your
commitment to children inspires me and gives me hope that as an interna-
tional community of professionals we are working together to improve the
plight of children around the world.
I am particularly indebted to my close colleagues in Israel and the sup-
portive group of clinicians who are committed as I am to treating severe
abuse.
Finally, I would like to thank the many clients and their families who
taught me so much and gave me permission to share their stories with you.
Preface
We are living in a different world than the one in 2013 when the first edition
of The Child Survivor was published. A global pandemic has caused wide-
spread death and chaos, as countries around the world have tried to battle
an unfamiliar virus, Covid-19, with scarce resources and poor preparation.
The current pandemic is superimposed over a much more ancient one—
that of child abuse. The Covid pandemic has exacerbated the effects of the
pandemic of child abuse, as many children have been trapped at home
in violent families without the respite of school and other outside activi-
ties. Like the anxious and suffering global population, children around
the world are also experiencing a pandemic of violence and vulnerability
to exploitative forces which they cannot control. The exploitation is often
invisible and ubiquitous—at the hands of parents, teachers, religious lead-
ers, coaches, etc.
During the Covid pandemic we have been saturated with information—
much of which is contradictory. Similarly, the awareness of how to deal
with our silent pandemic of child abuse and trauma is confused by contra-
dictory messages that waver between the polarities of concern and denial.
Traumatized children are trapped in cycles of enacting on themselves and
others the harm they have experienced. We need a trauma-informed soci-
ety aware of the ongoing harm that comes with the pandemic of global
child abuse.
In December of 2019, a novel coronavirus (Coronavirus Disease of 2019,
or Covid-19) was discovered in Wuhan China which is highly contagious,
causing severe respiratory disease and death, particularly among those with
preexisting infections. Covid-19 quickly made its way around the world,
leading to the infection of millions of people throughout countries in
xvi PREFACE
every inhabited continent, with over 500,000 deaths in the United States
and hundreds of thousands more predicted. Countries varied in their suc-
cess in coping with this global pandemic. Countries that had standardized
procedures based on epidemiological science involving testing, tracking
the infection, and isolation, such as South Korea, New Zealand, and Sin-
gapore, were the most effective in containing the virus. Countries with less
organized guidelines, such as the United States and Brazil, were less suc-
cessful in stemming the outbreak and reducing mortality.
In the beginning, myths about Covid-19 abounded. One myth was that
children and African-Americans were immune, when in fact children read-
ily spread the virus and people of color are at more risk due to preex-
isting conditions, close living quarters, and lack of access to health care.
In the United States, people were confused about whether wearing masks
was helpful, whether quarantine was necessary, and whether asymptomatic
people could spread the infection, as the leadership was not unified in
providing accurate public health messaging. Contradictory messages led to
public confusion and an increase in cases.
The global pandemic led to radical changes in people’s lives. Schools
were closed for months and many people lost their jobs. Parents able to
work from home were forced to do so while also attempting to care for
and provide schooling for their children. These conditions caused signifi-
cant family stress. Calls to domestic violence hotlines and abuse hotlines
increased dramatically, as outlets for safety were limited by the shutdown.
Children suffered increasing anxiety, depression, sleep disorders, and
regression (Canapari, 2020; Dana, 2020; Polizzi, Lynn, & Perry, 2020).
Therapy moved to electronic platforms, making it more difficult for thera-
pists to connect with their vulnerable clients. Whether for the best or not,
this new venue for offering therapy to traumatized children is here to stay,
and in this edition tips for providing teletherapy to children are covered.
Personal protective equipment was in short supply or ineffective, and
essential workers in food supply and health care put their lives on the line
as they were forced to balance ethical obligations to humanity with risk to
their own health and that of their family members. Balancing these huge
stresses brought a renewed sense of solidarity in some communities and
gratitude to essential workers. Applause at 7 pm nightly for the health care
workers of New York City became an empowering ritual for a traumatized,
but grateful, city. With testing limited, frightened and disrupted popula-
tions were left unsure of how widespread the infection was in their com-
munities. In November 2020 positivity rates among those tested reached
50% in parts of the United States. These levels were surprising and provide
further confirmation of how contagious this infection really is.
Similarly, epidemiological studies of abuse show that the prevalence
of sexual abuse in children in the general population is higher than the
PREFACE xvii
The area of cybercrime is one of the crime areas most affected by the
COVID-19 crisis. This includes online child sexual abuse. As both children
and offenders have been forced to stay home and spend more time on the
internet, the threat stemming from online child sexual abuse has increased.
Children can be abused and videos of the abuse can be sent through Inter-
net connections that leave no electronic trace, such as live-streaming. This
Internet exploitation of children occurs throughout the world wherever
children are left unprotected by ill-informed or neglectful adults (Handra-
han, 2017). Often posing as peers, perpetrators will entice children to
send compromising pictures and then extort them for years threatening to
expose what they have done as they coerce them into engaging in increas-
ingly horrifc acts. Some children have developed posttraumatic symptoms
simply from the vicarious viewing of the abuse of other children on the
Internet. Also, cybercrime rings have proliferated where participants share
images and videos of children in order to turn a proft and feed the pru-
rient interests of themselves and others. Some children are forced into
xviii PREFACE
sexual acts on demand while customers request specifc acts, and they are
live-streamed to customers.
The most serious form of this cybercrime is termed “hurtcore,” in which
participants try to outdo each other regarding the level of harm and tor-
ture they can inflict on younger and younger children—sometimes even
resulting in the child’s death (Daly, 2019; Maxim, Orlando, Skinner, &
Broadhurst, 2016). Because of my recent therapeutic work with children
traumatized by this type of crime, I have included an additional chapter
in this book (see Chapter 14), which covers the organized abuse of chil-
dren, many of whom were victimized during the production of child sexual
abuse imagery.
A positive change that has taken place since the first edition of this book
was published in 2013 is the “#MeToo” movement and the increased media
attention to abuse by men in positions of power. Sexual assault and child
abuse are crimes that society loves to disbelieve until imposed on their field
of vision, inducing momentary outrage and then conveniently forgotten
once again. The phrase “me too” developed into a movement following
its 2017 use as a hashtag following sexual assault allegations against power-
ful movie mogul Harvey Weinstein. With Mr. Weinstein’s conviction for
rape, we turned a corner in the prosecution of sex crimes against vulner-
able women, as his conviction was upheld despite the fact that some of his
victims acknowledged consensual relations with Weinstein after the crime
(Ransom, 2020). After a hung jury in the first trial, Bill Cosby was finally
found guilty in 2018 of drugging and raping a woman. More than 50 other
women reported similar assaults. Mr. Cosby’s case was the first high-profile
sexual assault trial to unfold in the aftermath of the #MeToo movement,
and many considered the verdict a watershed moment, as a popular and
beloved man was finally convicted (Bowley & Hurdle, 2018). Cosby’s con-
viction seemed to signal that, going forward, the accounts of female accus-
ers may be afforded greater weight and credibility by jurors.
In 2018, Larry Nassar, a widely respected physician in the gymnastics
community, was sentenced to 40 to 125 years in prison after pleading guilty
to seven counts of sexual assault of minors. Nearly 200 girls spoke out in
person or in statements about how Nassar’s sexual abuse changed their
lives (Levenson, 2018). We watched a brilliant psychologist, Dr. Christine
Ford, bravely testify on national television about an attempted rape when
she was a teenager. Many watched in disbelief as her alleged rapist was con-
firmed to serve on America’s Supreme Court (Reston, 2018). People were
shocked to hear of Jeffrey Epstein’s organized sex trafficking of girls while
socializing with some of the most elite and influential members of society
(Calleman, 2020). The #MeToo movement has given abused women and
children more credibility and freedom to speak their truth. However, in a
powerful tug of the pendulum in the other direction, Australian Cardinal
George Pell, the highest-ranking Catholic official to ever be charged and
PREFACE xix
Traumatized children and the mental health systems designed to help them
often seem to be in a standoff, a virtual battle of wills. Traumatized children
often develop symptoms that resist medication and seem impervious to all
of the treatments we try to offer them. Logical consequences don’t seem
to matter, and they are often caught in what seem to be repeated cycles of
self-harm, provocation, and self-destruction.
Our classification systems are often hard-pressed to come up with the
right labels, and often these labels cast judgment on what appear to be
inevitable consequences of the hard lives they have lived. Those of you who
work regularly with children in our mental health systems will be familiar
with what I mean. Children from serial foster homes are often diagnosed
with attachment disorders. Yet, these children in their wisdom have not
risked attachment knowing that foster homes change as quickly as each
new approaching birthday. Is this an appropriate adaptation or a symptom
of a psychological disorder?
Children exposed to extreme abuse and trauma are often labeled “bipo-
lar,” as their moods seem contradictory and shifting. Yet, shifting moods
may be adaptive when a child’s environment can quickly shift between
being safe and unpredictably frightening and abusive. Some traumatized
children hear voices commanding them to fight back or voices consoling
them with comforting words. They are often labeled psychotic. Yet when
lacking consistent parental guidance and support, children adapt by pro-
viding themselves with the soothing or protection that they so desperately
need. The labels we give traumatized children often restrict our thinking
and prevent us from acknowledging the internal wisdom and logic of the
symptoms our clients have “chosen” as their only hope of survival in the
xxii INTRODUCTION
war zone of their haphazard and violent lives. For many chronically trau-
matized children, the symptoms learned in a lifetime of thwarted goals
remain their only comfort. These symptoms represent the tools they devel-
oped to navigate the unpredictable worlds of their childhood—tools that
they do not want to give up despite our interventions.
This book will focus on the young survivors of early trauma—sexual
abuse, physical abuse, neglect, abandonment, multiple placements—who
often rely on dissociative strategies to cope with the dilemmas in their
world. In this book, you will learn how to understand the symptoms of
the severely traumatized child or teen as adaptive mechanisms to help
them cope with the chaotic world that is their habitat. They use “automatic
programs” like rage, retreat, or regression that help them avoid authen-
tic emotional engagement. Often these children adapt to the conflicting
pulls of their hidden emotional world by attributing responsibility for their
behavior to internal characters that represent their contradictory feelings
and attitudes. They sometimes have amnesia for recent events, as they have
learned remembering the reality of their own behavior and that of others
may result in overwhelming anxiety that they are not able to soothe.
Understanding the child as an adaptive survivor provides the necessary
key for unlocking tools that promote healing. A simple solution emerges:
provide a world where remembering what happened, trusting your caregiv-
ers, distinguishing the past from the present, and regulating emotions is
adaptive. As a therapist, your own office becomes that new resource-rich
habitat, and with your guidance leaving their survival symptoms behind
becomes both possible and worthwhile. In this book, guided by the knowl-
edge of the child survivor’s resourcefulness and adaptive potential, we will
look at each of the many symptoms that severely traumatized and disso-
ciative children and teens may display. The techniques discussed promote
healing and encourage new ways to cope with the stresses of dissociative
children’s lives.
Balina, like many of the children you will meet in this book, displayed
significant dissociative symptoms when I met her at age 9. She went into
“shutdown” states from which she had difficulty being aroused, and her
behavior fluctuated from calm to rageful without apparent precipitants.
Her history of sexual abuse, multiple placements, and inconsistent caregiv-
ing was typical of the many children you will encounter in these pages. When
faced with difficult interpersonal and academic challenges, she would curl
into a fetal position under a desk in her classroom. When faced with rules
or directives that she felt limited her unfairly, she attacked in rage. Balina
accumulated diagnoses with each new placement—bipolar disorder, oppo-
sitional defiant disorder, and major depression with psychotic features. As
she moved through nine different foster homes, Balina learned to under-
stand her behaviors, not in terms of diagnoses, but as adaptations to life’s
INTRODUCTION xxiii
Fisher, 2011; Macfie, Cicchetti, & Toth, 2001; Putnam, Hornstein, & Peter-
son, 1996; Sar et al., 2014; Teicher, Samson, Polcari, & McGreenery, 2006;
Trickett, Noll, & Putnam, 2011; Waters, 2016).
The experience of clinicians around the world suggests that many dis-
sociative children are not responsive to the standard trauma treatments
currently available (Waters, 2016; Wieland, 2015). Memory problems can
make it difficult for conventional forms of therapy to be effective, and
some of the most severe dissociative symptoms, like profound dissociative
“shutdown,” may be misdiagnosed as neurological symptoms. Dissociative
children present unique treatment challenges as the intensity of their act-
ing out and destructive behaviors are difficult to handle in outpatient and
even inpatient settings (Hornstein & Tyson, 1991; Ratnamohan et al., 2018;
Ruths, Silberg, Dell, & Jenkins, 2002).
There is emerging evidence that dissociation is indeed a predictor of
clinical severity in child and adolescent populations. In a study of children
entering the child welfare system, the presence of significant dissociation
was a key predictor of psychiatric hospitalization; and significant dissocia-
tion was the symptom that predicted the most rapid need for hospitaliza-
tion for children in care (Kisiel, Torgersen, & McClelland, 2020). When
successful treatment is offered, the interruption of the development of
adult Dissociative Identity Disorder (DID) will not only prevent a potential
lifetime of severe pathology, but may have significant economic benefit to
society as well. Studies show that the longer a client receives dissociation-
specific treatment, the lower the ultimate cost utilization for both outpa-
tient and inpatient services (Langeland et al., 2020; Myrick, Webermann,
Langeland, Putnam, & Brand, 2017). How much more cost savings would
be realized if children were treated in a more timely fashion?
This book describes a set of therapeutic interventions called Dissocia-
tion-Focused Interventions (DFI) (see Appendix A). Dissociation-Focused
Interventions uniquely address the needs of children and adolescents
who have dissociative symptoms that are resistant to more conventional
approaches to treatment. The approach described in this book can be used
alone or in combination with many other new and developing practices
that have shown promise in remediation of the symptoms of traumatized
children (Arvidson et al., 2011; Blaustein & Kinniburgh, 2010; Busch &
Lieberman, 2007; Cohen, Mannario, & Deblinger, 2006; Ford & Cloitre,
2009; Gomez, 2012; Perry, 2009; Struik, 2014).
Although more research is needed which focuses specifically on chil-
dren, there is reason to believe that, when properly utilized, treatment of
dissociation in children can be efficacious. In 1998, my colleague Frances
Waters and I presented preliminary results of our treatment of 34 disso-
ciative clients and found moderate to major improvement for clients who
stayed in treatment and who had consistent parental support (Silberg &
Waters, 1998). The positive outcomes possible with techniques focused
INTRODUCTION xxv
this approach are treatment models based on affect theory (Kluft, 2007;
Monsen & Monsen, 1999; Nathanson, 1992; Tomkins, 1962; 1963), mod-
els that stress attachment disruption (Hughes, 2006; James, 1994; Kagan,
2004), and models focusing on a relational approach to clients exposed to
early trauma (Pearlman & Courtois, 2005). The work of clinicians who are
part of the Child Committee of the International Society for the Study of
Dissociation has also played an important role in the development of the
ideas and concepts presented here (see e.g., Baita, 2020; Sinason & Marks,
in press; Waters, 2016; Wieland, 2015).
The acronym EDUCATE organizes a sequence of steps of Dissociation-
Focused Intervention. These steps begin with psychoeducation about
trauma and dissociation (E: Education), and assessing the child’s motiva-
tions to hold on to their dissociation (D: Dissociation motivation). The
next group of interventions assists the child in understanding (U) what is
hidden and claiming (C) the hidden parts of the self. The A in EDUCATE
stands for regulation of arousal, affect, and attachment. The techniques
covered under the “A” include managing hyperarousal, hypoarousal, and
regulating affect in the context of attachment relationships. Traumatic
processing and understanding triggers are the “T” in the EDUCATE
model. Processing traumatic events involves attending to the content of
early trauma, its sensory and affective associations, and its meaning to the
child. The final E of the EDUCATE model represents the ending stage
of therapy and provides techniques to help the child survivor face new
developmental challenges, while fully accepting the self and the meaning
of their traumatic history. As an integrated self, the true survivor learns to
leave the past in the past and comes to appreciate who they are despite
where they have come from.
People in other fields often ask me if it doesn’t sometimes become
depressing, working with children who have been so badly hurt and
abused. “No,” I answer, “It is exhilarating, discovering anew the amazing
resiliency and potential of each new client.” I hope you will find the same
exhilaration as you apply some of these techniques to the children on your
caseload, and admire the strength and adaptive potential of the children
you will meet in these pages, and the children you will treat. Through your
treatment of each individual child, you have the potential to reverse cycles
of abuse and help create for the next generation the safe, tolerant, loving
world that all of our young clients deserve.
Chapter 1
“It’s like you’re on autopilot and someone else is controlling the switches,”
stated Shawn Hornbeck, kidnap victim and sexual abuse survivor. With these
words, he explained the dissociation, helplessness and terror that kept him
tied to his kidnapper for over four years until his rescue by the FBI in 2007
outside of St. Louis—only 50 miles from his home (Dodd, 2009). When
interviewed later about his trauma, Shawn stated, “Most people would say
their greatest fear is probably dying, but that’s not mine. I would have to say
my greatest fear is probably not being understood” (Keen, 2008).
At age 11, Shawn was abducted from his neighborhood and forced to
live with a sex offender, who enrolled him in school, gave him a pseud-
onym, and enforced his enslavement with threats and rewards for compli-
ance. Shawn felt his healing from the trauma of his abuse and captivity was
directly tied to people understanding the helplessness and terror that kept
him trapped with his abuser, enduring repeated trauma and humiliation.
Like Shawn Hornbeck, the children in this book have felt the helpless-
ness and terror of their plight, felt like they have been on “auto-pilot”
and that their behaviors are misunderstood even by well-meaning people.
However, unlike Shawn’s trauma, their stories have captured no headlines.
They have endured their trauma in isolation, but yearn to be understood
with the hope that healing can follow from this understanding.
Trauma has been defined as events that are outside of the individual’s
normal expected life experiences and are perceived as a threat to “life,
bodily integrity” or “sanity” (Pearlman & Saakvitne, 1995, p. 60). The indi-
vidual faced with trauma feels at that moment, or multiple moments in
time, that they will not be able to survive. This experience of intense pow-
erlessness is a hallmark of trauma. Martha Stout (2001) explained, “These
2 TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS
SOCIETAL DENIAL
allegations and mass hysteria. Yet, a careful analysis of actual case records
revealed that claims of police and clinician misconduct were often misre-
ported or exaggerated. Ross Cheit (2014) found the key that unravels this
scandal of misinformation that led to a backlash against believing young
children who report abuse.
The State v. Michaels trial against defendant Kelly Michaels, charged with
abusing children in the Wee Care daycare center in New Jersey, was a turn-
ing point. In 1993, the New Jersey Appellate Division overturned the con-
victions and established the requirement for “taint hearings” to evaluate
whether children’s claims are free of suggestive bias. However, a closer look
at the evidence reveals “a smoking gun.” The researchers who filed a friend
of the court brief for the defendant included in their brief interview tran-
scripts that had been edited in such a way that they misrepresented inter-
views with the children. By deleting children’s disclosures while including
interviewers’ questions after these disclosures, the edited transcripts gave
the erroneous appearance that suggestive interviewing techniques were
being used. The overall impression from these edited transcripts was that
the interviewer was leading the child and suggesting the answers. This brief
was very impactful in changing the discourse about childhood abuse, lead-
ing to the widespread misassumption that glaring errors in interviewing
were the basis of convictions against daycare providers nationally.
This strong bias against believing children became codified in profes-
sional literature such as Ceci and Bruck’s (1995) Jeopardy in the Courtroom
which based many of its conclusions about children’s suggestibility on
these mis-transcriptions of key interviews. One could conclude that a whole
science of “suggestibility” and the subsequent requirement in New Jersey of
taint hearings to determine if children’s testimony was suggested is based,
in part, on these misleading transcripts. These hearings have made it much
more difficult to prosecute child abuse. It is my hope that, in time, the
significance of this error will be exposed and some of these legal require-
ments re-examined.
While loud and often slickly packaged as if scientific, denials of the prev-
alence or the harm of abuse and trauma ring hollow, as increasingly per-
suasive research data document long-term health outcomes, psychological
co-morbidity, and even brain impairment as a measurable effect of a variety
of traumatic events.
Sexual Abuse
neglect. In addition, sexually abused children are at risk for further sexual
victimization and when victimized suffer more severe consequences (Bri-
ere, Runtz, Rassart, & Godbout, 2020). Research on sexually abused chil-
dren and teens documents high levels of dissociation in this population
(Bonanno, Noll, Putnam, O’Neill, & Trickett, 2003; Collin-Vézina & Hébert,
2005; Hagan, Gentry, Ippen, & Lieberman, 2017; Macfie, Cicchetti, & Toth,
2001) with dissociative symptoms related to early onset of sexual abuse, multi-
ple perpetrators (Trickett et al., 2011), and duration of sexual abuse (Hébert
et al., 2017). Dissociative symptoms are also associated with risk-taking behav-
ior (Kisiel & Lyons, 2001), self-harm (Hoyos et al., 2019), affect dysregulation,
and disorganized attachment (Hébert, Langevin & Charest, 2020).
A new form of sexual exploitation that therapists are just beginning to
see in their practices is children abused for the purpose of creating child
sexual abuse imagery (CSAI). This term has been used to replace the older
term “child pornography” which people often understood as simply nude or
suggestive pictures of children. The added experience of having been vic-
timized “digitally” significantly adds to the victims’ posttraumatic stress and
negatively impacts their quality of life and subjective well-being (Hamby et al.,
2018). These digital images often portray scenes of horrific sexual and physi-
cal torture. The trend has been toward portraying younger and younger chil-
dren and subjecting them to the most horrific acts imaginable. In a survey by
Gewirtz-Meydana, Walsh, Wolak, and Finkelhor (2018), 22% of victims whose
images were found online reported their abuse began at age 2 or younger.
The most severe form of child sexual abuse imagery exploitation has been
termed “hurtcore” (Maxim, Orlando, Skinner, & Broadhurst, 2016; Daly,
2019). Arrests in Australia reveal that networks of perpetrators interested
in these materials may establish communities in which they trade images
and promote the trafficking of live children often exploiting them through
streaming sexual torture scenarios in real time. These children suffer with
the awareness that depictions of their abuse remain on the Internet in per-
petuity and their suffering is enjoyed by others. These survivors are dealing
with unique issues as they are often plagued by guilt that their images may
be used to induce others into sexual exploitation, and the forced smiles cap-
tured in still or moving images make them feel a sense of ongoing complic-
ity with the crimes (Gewirtz-Meydana et al., 2018; Leonard, 2010). The fact
that their abusers are, for the most part, anonymous and nameless makes it
hard to deal with specific episodes of exploitation in therapy. In addition,
these survivors may become increasingly inhibited with computers becom-
ing triggers for overwhelming anxiety (Leonard, 2010).
This new area of child exploitation created the provocative legal ques-
tion of whether each new viewer of a child’s images owes restitution to that
individual victim as a potential cause of the victim’s suffering. The Supreme
Court in US v. Paroline (572 US__2014) was asked to consider whether a
TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS 7
“perpetrator” who viewed her image long after Amy’s sexual abuse as a
child and who never met the real Amy could still be a cause of her harm
and owe her restitution. The Supreme Court has answered affirmatively
and determined that each viewer owes the survivor monetary compensa-
tion as if they “virtually” participated in the original crime. Justice Kennedy
wrote:
The cause of the victims’ general losses is the trade of her images and Paro-
line is a part of that cause for he is one of those who viewed her images. While
it is not possible to identify a discrete readily definable incremental loss he
caused, it is indisputable that he was a part of the overall phenomenon that
caused her general losses.
Physical Abuse
Physical abuse may affect as much as 23% of children and, like sexual
abuse, has broad-ranging implications for later adjustment (Kolko, 2002).
In addition to the physical effects of early physical injury such as scarring, or
feeding problems, the physically abused child is likely to suffer a variety of
cognitive and emotional consequences as well. Physically abused children
have been found to have academic and attentional problems, with lower
scores in both reading and math and higher risk of repeating an academic
grade (Kolko, 2002). Physically abused children may also have significant
problems with anger, and are two times more likely than their peers to be
arrested for violent crimes when they reach adolescence (Widom, 1989).
In addition to problems with aggression and anti-social behavior, physically
abused children have higher levels of depression, anxiety, and suicidal ide-
ation and suicide attempts (Silverman, Reinherz, & Giaconia, 1996).
There appears to be a particularly robust relationship between a history
of physical abuse and dissociation (Hulette, Freyd, & Fisher, 2011; Macfie
et al., 2001). The children I have worked with who have been victims of
physical abuse describe learning how to disconnect their experience of the
physical sensation of pain, and this dulling in their sensory experiences
often generalizes to other physical sensations as well. Boys who have been
physically abused often struggle to control aggressive reactions to even
minor provocations and may seem to turn these aggressive responses “on”
and “off” dramatically, to the consternation and confusion of those around
them. The realization that someone chose to hurt them consciously often
becomes a prominent theme that must be addressed in their treatment.
Relationships tend to be fraught with suspicion and hypervigilance about
potential harm, and this may affect the development of intimate relation-
ships as these children grow older. Research suggests that when sexual
abuse is associated with physical abuse, the long-term effects on later adjust-
ment are more severe (Fergussen, Boden, & Horwood, 2008).
Neglect
Of the 3.3 million reports of child abuse that came into child services in the
United States in 2010, 78% were for suspected neglect (U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services, 2011). These numbers likely underestimate
the actual incidence of neglect, which is often unreported and affects a
high percentage of infants and young children.
Neglect has profound long-term implications for development, with
neglected children having difficulties with cognitive development and
early language skills, insecure attachment, peer difficulties, problems with
modulation of emotional arousal, negative self-perceptions, early signs of
TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS 9
Emotional Abuse
Covid-19
The global pandemic that began in March of 2020 left an underlying layer
of turmoil that has exacerbated and compounded the ubiquitous trauma
in children’s lives. The rates of child abuse, domestic violence, and com-
munity violence went up during this troubling time (Faller, 2020). The
isolation of children from teachers, the most common reporters to child
protective services, has removed the protective eyes of adults concerned
about children’s welfare. The stresses of unemployed parents, confined in
close quarters with their children, or parents working from home trying
to manage their children, adds significant risk factors for the possibility
of child maltreatment. Initial research shows that child maltreatment is
increasing and that children brought to emergency rooms during the pan-
demic have injuries that are more life-threatening (Faller, 2020). Since the
pandemic, an increasing number of children are also coming to emergency
rooms with psychiatric symptomatology (Leeb et al., 2020).
TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS 11
Fear of the virus itself leaves children feeling vulnerable, anxious, and
fearful for their lives and the lives of their family members. Disruption of
school and friendships during stay-at-home orders leaves children feeling
disconnected. Symptoms in children during this troubling time include
depression, anxiety, sleep disorders, and regression (Canapari, 2020; Dana,
2020; Polizzi, Lynn, & Perry, 2020). The need to wear masks often makes
children feel that they cannot breathe, and that they have difficulty read-
ing facial expressions from adults who interact with them with masks.
Reprimands from parents for approaching strangers, friends or even fam-
ily members becomes confusing for children’s sense of basic trust, even
though these reprimands stem from the desire for safety for the children
and others. Electronic schooling can lead to feelings of depression and
alienation, and physical symptoms of headaches. Therapy using electronic
means is helpful for some children, but for others this medium is too dif-
ficult for them to maintain focus, and thus families are left with little sup-
port from mental health professionals they may have previously relied on.
Time spent online also increases the risk for online exploitation. Surveys
show that parenting has taken a step backwards during the pandemic, as
parents are more prone to losing their temper and using physical punish-
ment (Lee & Ward, 2020).
It will take years before we understand the full impact of all of these
stresses on children, but the impact of Covid-19 should not be minimized
as we examine global effects of trauma on children. It provides an under-
lying source of risk to children, particularly those most at risk for child
maltreatment.
While each of the forms of early trauma has known consequences, it
is the repeated exposure to multiple forms of trauma for children that
produce the most severe and long-lasting consequences. Some evidence
suggests that multiple kinds of trauma are associated with the highest levels
of dissociation (Hulette, Fisher, Kim, Granger, & Landsverk, 2008; Hulette
et al., 2011; Teicher et al., 2006). Other types of trauma such as early aban-
donment, death of parents, painful medical procedures, and exposure to
natural disaster may also lead to long-term consequences, which are magni-
fied when compounded with the other forms of early trauma.
DEVELOPMENTAL TRAUMA
The phrase developmental trauma has been used to describe early relational
trauma, particularly when the study population is children and adoles-
cents (van der Kolk et al., 2009). Researchers often count the number or
duration of caregiver-related traumas when assessing complex or develop-
mental trauma and have consistently found that the higher exposure to
multiple forms of trauma the more the severity of symptoms across a variety
of developmental domains increases. Exposure to multiple forms of trauma
impacts multiple affective and interpersonal domains (Cloitre et al., 2009),
creates significant disturbances in children’s affect regulation, impulse
control, and self-image (Spinalzzola et al., 2005), and increases the overall
severity of mental health symptoms (Kisiel et al., 2011).
The documentation of deficits in multiple domains of functioning
among those who have suffered from more severe forms of chronic trauma
led Bessel van der Kolk to propose a new diagnostic category for the DSM-5
called “Developmental Trauma Disorder” (van der Kolk, 2005; van der Kolk
et al., 2009). This diagnostic category aptly describes children who have
had exposure to chronic early trauma by focusing on the multiple dysregu-
lations in behavior, affect, perception, relationships, and somatic experi-
ences that are typical of chronically traumatized children. Unfortunately,
it was rejected from inclusion in DSM-5 despite the fact that research con-
tinues to find this diagnostic category uniquely descriptive of a population
of victimized children (Ford, Spinazzola, van der Kolk, & Grasso, 2018).
Developmental Trauma Disorder has been found to have construct, con-
vergent and discriminant validity and reliability. It successfully identified a
group of youngsters who were victims of multiple forms of victimization,
distinguished them from children with other diagnoses including PTSD,
TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS 13
people. There appear to be two critical periods for maltreatment that dis-
rupt the functioning of the amygdala, leading to over-reactivity and prim-
ing of the fear response—ages 4 and 13–15 (Teicher, 2019). Research
by Lyons-Ruth (2020) suggests that left amygdala enlargement relates to
avoidant or neglectful parenting while right amygdala dysfunction is associ-
ated more with maltreatment.
Joseph LeDoux (1996), a well-known neuroscientist, explained that
there are two “roads” for response to fear. The “low road” involves process-
ing fear instantaneously from the thalamus to the amygdala with resulting
immediate physiologic reactivity. In contrast, the “high road” involves the
processing of fear responses through the prefrontal cortex, which allows
careful matching of how close this stimulus resembles the original source
of trauma, and allows ongoing analysis inhibiting immediate reactivity.
Those who have been traumatized repeatedly, particularly at identified
critical periods, appear to have limited access to the “high road,” and as a
result trauma responses are immediate and uninhibited.
When this fear pathway is stimulated over and over again, the amyg-
dala becomes sensitized so that lower levels of stimuli can trigger condi-
tioned fear responses. Throughout this book you will meet young people
who show unthinking reactivity to stimuli in their environments—fight-
ing, rages, shutting down, hypersexuality—demonstrating the difficulty of
inhibiting conditioned responses to their traumatic past.
Also impaired by the effects of trauma are the more primitive areas of
the brain, such as the cerebellar vermis, which is involved in coordinat-
ing intentional body movements and associated with cognitive, linguistic,
social, and emotional skills (Teicher et al., 2003). Teicher’s work found
decreased blood flow in this area in the brains of abused individuals com-
pared to normal subjects. Teicher and colleagues noted that Harlow’s
famous baby monkeys who were deprived of tactile stimulation with their
mothers also showed deficits in this area of the brain. However, when pro-
vided with rocking stimulation, even with wire mother surrogates, these
deficits appear to be minimized.
The higher centers of the brain are also vulnerable to the effects of mal-
treatment. Evidence of cortical abnormalities in children suffering from
posttraumatic stress or histories of abuse has been demonstrated repeat-
edly (Carrion et al., 2001; De Bellis, Keshavan, Spencer, & Hall, 2000; Tei-
cher et al., 2003). Teicher et al. (2010) found that sexual abuse disrupts
the development of gray matter in both the right and left primary and
secondary visual cortex. The prefrontal cortex appears to be particularly
vulnerable to the effects of traumatic stress. The prefrontal cortex con-
tains regions that help evaluate current experiences and determine their
relevance to past experience. Without input from the prefrontal cortex,
the fear response activated in the amygdala cannot easily be calmed down.
16 TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS
this state there is stimulation of the dopaminergic system so that the body
may release endogenous opioids which decrease sensations of pain. These
findings are of particular interest as these are some of the physiological
correlates of dissociative states (see Chapter 10).
Steven Porges’s (2003; 2011) polyvagal theory sheds further light on
the physiology of dissociation and its phylogenetic roots. Porges proposes
that the stress management system in humans has developed a pathway
through the ventral vagus nerve which allows social engagement to help
regulate primitive physiological stress reactions. Stress can cause activation
of the sympathetic nervous system leading to fight response such as anger
and aggression, or to flight response like fleeing from the source of stress.
According to Porges, a third system mediated through the vagal nerve
can dramatically affect the body’s response to threat. This third pathway
involves the vagus nerve—either the higher nerve pathways (ventral) that
flow to the face, ears, and eyes, or the lower pathways (dorsal), which lead
to the digestive system and heart, inducing immobilization or collapse.
This immobilization or collapse is also found in some of our primitive ani-
mal ancestors and involves handling stress by total immobilization or “play-
ing dead,” and it can be seen in our clients when they are in a state of total
dissociative shutdown. Porges’s theory also highlights the survival value of
immobility responses for an organism trapped and faced with life-threat-
ening stressors. However, as human beings we are capable of activating the
higher-level ventral vagal pathway to experience the calming and soothing
effects of social engagement. Porges’ theory helps therapists appreciate the
important role of social engagement such as eye contact, smiles, and sooth-
ing vocalizations in helping to calm the stress response.
Lyons-Ruth’s (2020) research also emphasizes the role of the attach-
ment system in predisposing a child to dissociative and other pathological
attachment patterns. Her research team has identified a pattern she calls
“seek and squeak,” which is the response of babies and toddlers to the with-
drawal of maternal affections—seeking mother and making noises to gain
her attention. This response to the threat of abandonment, rather than
the threat of direct harm, can be found throughout the lifespan in behav-
iors of seeking attention from attachment objects despite repeated rejec-
tions. This may also help account for borderline attachment disruptions
following early maternal withdrawal and abandonment. These patterns are
associated specifically with the enlarged amygdala and hippocampal size
anomalies found in children with a history of maternal deprivation.
In summary, the brains of traumatized children are affected both struc-
turally and chemically by the effects of enduring stress. Multiple areas of
function are compromised resulting in disconnection and dysregulation.
The healthy brain is a brain that is well integrated, where communication
through brain chemicals flows freely in cascades of arousal and inhibition.
18 TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS
The brains of traumatized children lack integration with less fluid com-
munication both horizontally, between the right and left hemispheres,
and vertically between the higher and lower centers. The hippocampus
and prefrontal cortex do not readily communicate with the amygdala to
reduce fear reactions. The social engagement system can become tempo-
rarily “off-line” as the primitive vagal responses lead to states of collapse or
immobility or attention seeking without parental responsiveness leading to
self-punishing behaviors. Barriers to integration result from structural and
chemical effects of repeated traumatic experiences and the resulting use-
dependent pruning of brain cells.
The child’s traumatized brain has a dual handicap: Reactivity is
enhanced while regulation is impaired. As a result, the sensitized brain
overreacts to any suggestion of trauma and the regulating effects of higher
brain processes and chemical inhibitors are minimal. Research on the neu-
robiological effects of trauma also hints at multiple avenues for the remedi-
ation of symptoms. The brain grows by pruning and discarding underused
pathways, while strengthening new ones. Thus, the dysregulated brains of
traumatized children are uniquely adapted to the traumatic, chaotic, and
unpredictable environment in which the child finds himself. Getting out
of the way quickly is important for a child frequently exposed to danger.
To survive, there is no time to reflect or perform careful matching func-
tions to compare a new stimulus to an older source of fear. Disruptions
in memory may be adaptive when trauma and caregiving emanate from
the same source, as often happens in the environment of abused children.
Conversely, improvements in brain function may follow from targeted
therapeutic interventions. In fact, some preliminary research indicates that
therapeutic interventions, such as teaching mindfulness or building empa-
thy, can change the brain by increasing hippocampal grey matter (Joss,
Lazar & Teicher, 2020).
Understanding that certain abnormalities may be necessary to survive
trauma can help us appreciate what needs to be done to help the child
survivor adapt to a healthier, more regulated, and loving environment. The
parts of the brain affected by early trauma thus become the indirect tar-
get of our efforts, while the symptoms, behaviors, chronic reactivity, and
protective behaviors of the “survivor brain” become our direct targets. By
being aware of the ways exposure to chronic trauma has disrupted these
children’s developmental trajectory, we can target interventions to these
domains. The children you will meet throughout this book are a testament
to the potential of the brain to absorb and respond to the new healing
experiences we offer them in our therapeutic interventions.
The overarching goals of therapy are summarized in Table 1.2, with
speculation about how specific interventions might affect the developing
TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS 19
brains of traumatized children. This book will address many of these inter-
ventions with a special emphasis on Dissociation Focused Interventions
that address disruptions in the children’s continuity of awareness. Most
of the children and teens you will meet in these pages have significant
symptoms of dissociation as well as features of developmental trauma.
Like Shawn Hornbeck, they see themselves as living their life on “autopi-
lot,” feeling little control over their choices or behavior. Exploring their
dissociation can give us insight into the disruptions in affect regulation,
somatic experiences, cognitions, self-views, behaviors, and relationships,
that we often see in these children. We will explore the nature of the
types of dissociation found in chronically traumatized young people in
the next chapter.
20 TRAUMA AND ITS EFFECTS
SUMMARY