Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EBONYI STATE.)
1
Table of Contents
CHAPTER ONE........................................................................................................................................3
INTRODUCTION.....................................................................................................................................3
1.1 Background of the Study...........................................................................................................3
1.2 Statement of the Problem..........................................................................................................4
1.3 Purpose of the Study..................................................................................................................5
1.4 Research Questions....................................................................................................................5
1.5 Research Hypotheses.................................................................................................................5
1.6 Significance of the study..................................................................................................................6
1.7 Scope and Limitation of the Study:................................................................................................6
CHAPTER TWO.......................................................................................................................................7
LITERATURE REVIEW.........................................................................................................................7
2.1 Overview of Drug Abuse...................................................................................................................8
2.2 Concept of Crime..............................................................................................................................9
2.3 Types of Crimes..............................................................................................................................10
2.4 Causes of Drug Abuse.....................................................................................................................11
2.5 Effects of Drug Abuse.....................................................................................................................12
2.6 Drug abuse prevention or control measures.....................................................................................14
2.7 Theoretical Framework....................................................................................................................15
CHAPTER THREE.................................................................................................................................16
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY...........................................................................................................17
3.1 RESEARCH DESIGN.............................................................................................................17
3.2 AREA OF STUDY...................................................................................................................17
3.3 POPULATION OF STUDY....................................................................................................17
3.4 SAMPLE AND SAMPLING TECHNIQUES........................................................................17
3.5 INSTRUMENT FOR DATA COLLECTION.......................................................................17
3.6 VALIDATION OF INSTRUMENT.......................................................................................18
3.7 METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION.................................................................................18
3.8 METHOD OF DATA ANALYSIS.........................................................................................19
REFERENCES....................................................................................................................................20
2
CHAPTER ONE
INTRODUCTION
3
like cocaine, heroin, and cannabis. These youths often engage in violent outbursts, leading to
fights at the slightest provocation. Additionally, those under the influence may readily participate
in robbery, prostitution, or become part of rape gangs.
Against this backdrop, this study aims to explore the correlation between drug abuse and crime
among youths in Nigeria, particularly in Edo State. The rationale for examining this connection
lies in the highly reinforcing nature of stimulants, with drug users potentially entering the
criminal justice system due to substance-related offenses like possession or driving under the
influence. Given the strong association between stimulant use and criminality, investigating the
nexus between drug abuse and criminal behavior is pertinent at this juncture.
The connections and interactions among youths from diverse backgrounds manifest in various
ways, such as gatherings in beer spots and clubs. It is not uncommon for drugs to be consumed in
these locations. For instance, it's a common occurrence to witness youths drinking beverages
mixed with codeine, not to mention those consuming alcohol and Indian hemp. In such
situations, violence is frequent due to high levels of intoxication. Essentially, drug abuse can lead
to the formation of gangs, involvement in cultism, participation in armed robbery, and the
development of mental illness, among other consequences. Studies indicate that many youths
who become drug addicts initiated their substance use during adolescence, and as they age, they
seek new thrills, gradually progressing to harder drugs (Rodriguez et al., 2005).
In addition to explanations rooted in subcultures and lifestyles, it has been suggested that
individuals engaging in deviant behavior may use drugs either for self-medication or as a
rationale for their deviant actions. The question then arises: despite the evident detrimental
effects of excessive drug use, why do a large number of youths still engage in it? The
repercussions are evident in the widespread undesirable activities prevalent throughout Ebonyi
State, Nigeria.
4
pupils, undergraduate students, servicemen, cattle rearers, the unemployed, nurses, pharmacists,
and even medical doctors, are entangled in the problem of drug abuse.
The drug abuse phenomenon in Nigeria has a historical context, with the 1960s marking the
onset of substantial drug abuse among young people. The substances of abuse have evolved over
time, encompassing marijuana, amphetamines, heroin, cocaine, barbiturates, mandrax, and more
recently, codeine, which has gained significant prevalence. Notably, this issue extends beyond
urban centers, as drug subcultures manifest in suburban and economically distressed urban areas.
Presently, these deviant youth cultures exhibit distinctive behaviors, including unconventional
clothing, unique hairstyles, non-conventional sexual practices, and the illicit or improper use of
drugs, adopting an international pattern (Kalunta, 2012).
According to Abdullahi (2005), the repercussions of drug abuse are manifold, leading to elevated
crime rates, fueling conflicts, promoting political thuggery, fostering religious intolerance,
increasing incidents of rape, domestic violence, suicide, and other societal maladies.
Additionally, the psychological and physical conditions of drug abusers are adversely affected.
5
1.6 Significance of the study
This undertaking holds significance for the following reasons:
It will unveil the prevalent drugs commonly abused by youths and identify the sources of
these substances.
The research seeks to educate youths with precise and current factual information about
drugs, emphasizing the detrimental effects of substance abuse.
By shedding light on the causes of drug abuse among youths, this work aims to contribute
to knowledge, creating awareness and capturing the attention of law enforcement
agencies, the government, and society at large.
The empirical data gathered will provide recommendations to mitigate or eradicate the
issues of drug abuse and crime in our community.
This research project will serve academic purposes, enriching literature in novel areas
such as codeine abuse.
Time Restraint:
The researcher will be concurrently involved in this study alongside other academic
commitments. This, in turn, will reduce the amount of time available for dedicated attention to
the research work
6
CHAPTER TWO
LITERATURE REVIEW
Odejide (2000) suggests that substance or drug abuse occurs when the use of a substance is not
pharmacologically necessary, particularly when used in defiance of legal prohibitions or when a
socially acceptable beverage is excessively consumed. In the context of this discussion, a drug is
defined as a substance capable of inducing changes in biological functions through its chemical
actions (Okoye, 2001), altering perception, cognition, mood, behavior, and general body function
(Balogun, 2006). Consequently, any use of a substance beyond medical prescription is
considered drug abuse, and individuals, particularly youths, may engage in such behavior due to
factors like peer influence, unemployment, parental divorce or separation, poverty, stress, and
frustration (Amosun, Ige, and Ajala, 2010).
The chronic use of substances among youths can lead to severe and sometimes irreversible
damage to their physical and psychological development (Sambo, 2008). Although substance
abuse affects all age groups, adolescents and teenagers are particularly vulnerable. Numerous
studies have highlighted the extensive consequences of substance abuse, with Fayombo and
Aremu (2000) identifying the misuse of marijuana as reaching epidemic levels in Nigerian
society, correlating with a reduction in academic achievement or the complete cessation of the
academic process. Okorodudu and Okorodudu (2004) and Odejide (1997) emphasize in their
respective works that substance abuse poses a universal threat, hindering the development of any
society as it jeopardizes life, health, dignity, and prosperity.
The prevalence of substance abuse in Nigerian society is complex and multifaceted, and various
theories have been proposed to explain its roots. Bandura and Walter's social learning theory
posits that behavior is learned, and personality results from the cumulative effects of learning
experiences. Similarly, Sutherland and Cressey's Differential Association Theory explains how
individuals, initially obedient, can progress into deviant or anti-social behavior, including
substance abuse, through a series of successive events. This theory emphasizes how deviant
behavior is learned without significant biological or psychological defects (Siegel, 2004).
The influence of peers and the role of impersonal communication agencies, such as movies,
television, radios, and newspapers, are significant factors contributing to substance abuse among
youths. Broken homes and the associated tensions and unhappiness contribute to the prevalence
of substance abuse, as does the pressure from parents dictating career goals beyond a child's
natural abilities. Frustrations, emotional stress, and the differential opportunity for success, as
proposed by Merton, drive individuals, especially the poor, into anti-social behavior, including
substance abuse.
7
The broken windows theory, developed by Wilson and Kelling (1982), suggests that effective
crime prevention should start with addressing seemingly "minor" offenses like substance abuse.
Ignoring such minor issues signals a lack of care and invites more serious crimes. This analogy
can be applied to substance abuse prevention among youths in Ebonyi State, emphasizing the
importance of addressing the root causes before the situation worsens in the future.
Drug abuse can be defined as the indiscriminate and excessive reliance on or misuse of a
specific drug, with or without a prior medical diagnosis from qualified health practitioners
(Lakhanpal & Agnihotri, 2007). According to Oluremi (2012), drug abuse constitutes the
harmful utilization of mind-altering substances, predominantly referring to issues with illegal
drugs but also encompassing the harmful use of legal prescription drugs, as seen in self-
medication practices.
A significant number of Nigerian adolescents unknowingly rely on various drugs for their daily
activities, including social, educational, political, and moral aspects. The substances involved
range from tobacco, Indian hemp, cocaine, morphine, heroin, alcohol, ephedrine, madras,
caffeine, glue, barbiturates, to amphetamines (Oshikoya and Alli, 2006; Oshodi, Aina, Onajole,
2010). Studies by Oshodi, Aina, and Onajole (2010) highlight that dependence and addiction are
major consequences of drug abuse among Nigerian undergraduates, leading to compulsive drug-
seeking behaviors and use persisting even in the face of adverse consequences. These behavioral
changes are considered maladaptive and inappropriate for the social or environmental setting,
posing potential harm to the individual.
Concerns about drug use among youths and adolescents in Nigeria extend to various
stakeholders, including the government, school administrators, religious leaders, and non-
governmental organizations. Experimentation with drugs during adolescence (11–25 years) is
common, driven by curiosity, the desire to assess a drug's effectiveness, seeking pleasure, stress
reduction, or a sense of maturity. Early use of alcohol and tobacco heightens the risk of
progressing to other, more harmful drugs later on. WHO and the World Heart Foundation data
indicate that 22.1 percent of Nigerian school youth aged between 12 to 17 years use tobacco,
raising concerns about potential health risks, including cardiovascular diseases, lung cancer, and
other tobacco-related illnesses (Abudu, 2008; Giade, 2011).
Despite efforts to curb drug abuse, reports from various parts of the world, including Nigeria,
reveal its severity. The British Office for National Statistics notes that 12 percent of pupils aged
8
11–15 have used drugs. Amphetamines are used among students, while barbiturates may be used
by adolescents with suicidal tendencies rather than for addictive purposes. Cannabis (marijuana)
appears to be the most commonly abused drug among adolescents (UNODC, 2011). Drugs are
pervasive in Nigerian cities, found in motor parks, street corners, joints on campuses,
uncompleted buildings, and under flyovers, as observed in surveys of outlets in different
locations (Abudu, 2008; Oshodi, Aina & Onajole, 2010).
From a normative standpoint, crime is perceived as deviant behavior that contravenes prevailing
norms and standards dictating normal human behavior (Matthew, 2018). This perspective
acknowledges the intricate realities surrounding the concept of crime, seeking to comprehend
how changing social, political, psychological, and economic conditions impact evolving
definitions of crime and the legal and penal responses from society. Various criminologists and
sociologists offer diverse definitions depending on the prevailing times.
Legally, any action by an individual that violates the law is deemed a crime. This violation could
involve either the commission of an act prohibited by law or the omission of an act commanded
by law (Gillian, 1954). However, legal definitions present challenges, categorizing both murder
and driving without a license as crimes, despite their vast differences in severity. In developing
societies, acts that were not considered crimes in the past may become so due to the enactment of
new laws.
Legal definitions evolve over time and vary across cultures. For instance, the sale and
consumption of alcohol may be considered a crime in some countries, while it is legal in others.
Debates and policy changes, such as the reclassification of cannabis in the United Kingdom,
illustrate the dynamic nature of legal definitions.
The social construction of crime is evident in the language used to describe criminal activities.
Terms like 'crime,' 'offense,' and 'theft' differ from softer words like 'fiddle' or 'perk,' which are
employed to describe and downplay criminal activities in the workplace. Certain activities are
excluded from the social construction of crime, reflecting societal biases.
9
The issue of 'white-collar,' business, or corporate crime has been recognized since the early
twentieth century but continues to be neglected and under-researched by criminologists. Defining
white-collar or corporate crime has proven challenging, with varying perspectives on its scope.
Organizational crime is seen as illegal acts of omission or commission within a legitimate formal
organization, impacting employees, consumers, or the general public.
In examining various explanations or theories of criminal behavior, it becomes apparent that the
majority of criminological research has focused on lower socio-economic groups, reflecting
historical concerns about a perceived 'dangerous class.' The law and criminology have
predominantly targeted this group, marked by the shift from capital punishment to determinate
prison sentences.
Crimes directed at individuals, also known as personal crimes, encompass murder, aggravated
assault, rape, and robbery. The occurrence of personal crimes in the United States is not uniform,
with a higher incidence among the young, urban, impoverished, and racial minority populations.
Offenses involving the theft of property without causing bodily harm, such as burglary, larceny,
auto theft, and arson, fall under property crimes. Similar to personal crimes, individuals who are
young, urban, impoverished, and belong to racial minorities tend to be more involved in these
types of crimes.
Crimes against morality, often termed victimless crimes due to the absence of a complainant or
victim, include activities like prostitution, illegal gambling, and illegal drug use.
White-Collar Crime
White-collar crimes are perpetrated by individuals of elevated social standing within the context
of their professional occupations. This category encompasses actions like embezzlement (theft
from one's employer), insider trading, and violations of income tax laws, including tax evasion.
Organized Crime
Organized crime refers to illegal activities carried out by structured groups, typically involving
the distribution of illicit goods and services. While many associate organized crime with entities
like the Mafia, the term can encompass any group exerting control over significant illegal
10
enterprises, such as drug trafficking, illegal gambling, prostitution, weapons smuggling, or
money laundering.
Individuals must take responsibility for their actions, recognizing that an understanding of
root causes is not an excuse to evade personal accountability. While individuals are obligated
to act responsibly and show respect for others, communities also bear the responsibility to
address conditions hindering healthy development that may serve as breeding grounds for
crime. The well-documented root causes of crime encompass various adverse social,
economic, cultural, and family conditions, which can be categorized into three main groups:
Economic Factors/Poverty:
Social Environment
The social structure reflects our values and priorities, influencing citizens and communities.
Social root causes of crime include inequality, the withholding of power, insufficient support
for families and neighborhoods, perceived or real inaccessibility to services, a lack of
leadership, a low value placed on children and individual well-being, and excessive reliance
on television for recreation.
Family Structures:
Families play a unique role in nurturing responsible members of society, but the
responsibility extends beyond families to encompass communities and society at large.
Dysfunctional family conditions contribute to future delinquency, involving parental
inadequacy, conflicts, criminality, communication issues, a lack of respect and responsibility,
abuse, neglect, and family violence.
Crime prevention efforts should target improvements in all three areas, addressing economic
factors, social environments, and family structures comprehensively.
11
2.5 Effects of Drug Abuse
Substance abuse constitutes a significant aspect of health problems impacting both substance
abusers and non-users in various ways. Numerous health issues, whether related to physical or
mental well-being, are of paramount concern to governments and policymakers. This study aims
to investigate the effects of substance abuse on physical, social, and mental health. Continuous
and excessive drug intake often leads to dependence, with individuals persistently using drugs
regardless of prescriptions or recommended dosages, eventually resulting in addiction (Doherty
& Gaughran, 2014). This habitual drug use persists despite the psychological, physical, and
mental health problems it may cause.
Individuals engaging in drug abuse may suffer from heart-related ailments such as high blood
pressure, stroke, heart attack, musculoskeletal issues, neurological disorders, and respiratory
diseases. Substance use not only affects the brain but also causes damage to various organs in the
body (Keaney et al., 2011). Drug addicts who inject substances intravenously are at a heightened
risk of HIV/AIDS, lung and throat cancer, stomach cancer, liver cirrhosis, hepatitis B and C, and
reproductive health problems. The adverse effects extend to impotence, low sperm count,
tuberculosis, diabetes mellitus, injuries from road traffic accidents, and complications during
childbirth, such as low birth weight and fetal alcohol syndrome (Ekpenyongi, 2012).
Psychoactive drugs like cocaine, lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD), and amphetamines can result
in sleeping disorders, poor appetite, restlessness, irritability, suicidal depressions, paranoia,
hallucinations, panic reactions, sensory disorientation, and even loss of life (Njoku et al., 2017).
The societal impact of psychoactive substances includes the recurrence of social unrest, criminal
activities, insurgencies, and terrorism, often committed under the influence of drugs. Substance
abuse is also linked to the prevalence of HIV/AIDS, with injectable drugs identified as a
significant mode of transmission (UNODC, 2010). Excessive alcohol use can adversely affect
the central nervous system, leading to sensations and depression similar to sleeping tablets, as
well as damaging motor coordination, altering vision, and causing erectile dysfunction, heart
failure, and hypertension (Butcher et al., 2004). Tobacco, when smoked or used in other forms, is
a major cause of heart diseases, cancer, tuberculosis, and reduced life expectancy (Cicchetti &
Handley, 2019). Second-hand smoke, or Environmental Tobacco Smoke (ETS), also poses
health risks, leading to heart diseases and lung and throat cancer in non-smokers.
12
Marijuana smokers may experience anemia, dry eyes, dry mouth, increased appetite, and
hypertension, posing a danger to individuals with cardiovascular problems. Cannabis use is
associated with a higher risk of lung cancer and can impair brain functioning, leading to poor
academic performance, memory loss, and decreased attentiveness among users (Freeman et al.,
2018). Heroin abuse can result in central nervous system damage, respiratory depression, nausea,
vomiting, and organ damage, with the additional risk of HIV/AIDS transmission through shared
needles. Cocaine use is linked to paralysis, cardiac attacks, sexual dysfunction, and mental
disorders such as anxiety and depression (Craig and Baucum, 2001). Methamphetamine, known
for inducing a strong desire for continued use, can lead to euphoria, wakefulness, decreased
appetite, irritability, aggression, anxiety, and heart attacks (Shehu and Rao, P.D., 2020c).
Drug abuse is associated with various mental disorders, ranging from mild neuroses to severe
psychoses. Substance use disorders can lead to insomnia, restlessness, hallucinations, and drug
dependence. Overdosing on drugs may result in premature death, increased crime and violence,
cultism, insurgency, terrorism, family and job loss, school dropout, and a collapse in the social
system (Link et al., 1999). Alcoholic drinks and sleeping-inducing tablets can cause depression,
and withdrawal from these substances can affect mental health by inducing nervousness, anxiety,
headaches, fatigue, and other symptoms (Rice and Dolgin, 2008). Tobacco withdrawal may also
lead to mental health problems such as nervousness, anxiety, lightheadedness, headaches,
fatigue, constipation, diarrhea, dizziness, sweating, cramps, tremors, and palpitations. Tobacco
smokers may display antisocial and deviant behavior, especially when the supply of products is
reduced or stopped. Marijuana use can result in memory loss, distorted perceptions, trouble with
thinking and problem-solving, and drug-induced psychoses, hallucinations, delusions, and
schizophrenia. Cocaine abuse can cause nervousness, irritability, restlessness, paranoia, physical
exhaustion, and mental confusion, loss of weight, and fatigue or depression, leading to severe
mental disorders. Excessive cocaine use may result in cocaine psychosis, a severe mental
disorder due to cocaine addiction, with symptoms such as hallucinations, delusions, and the
sensation of insects crawling under the skin.
Persistent drug abuse among students may lead to dropouts, reduced investment opportunities,
and riots in universities or colleges, disrupting academic calendars and contributing to poor
13
academic performance (Yusuf et al., 2013). Drug abuse is closely linked to crimes such as theft,
burglary, rape, sodomy, lesbianism, commercial sex work, and pickpocketing (
Mohammad & Yusof, 2014). Ethno-religious conflict and political violence may also arise under
the influence of drugs, with youth often being major contributors to social unrest in Nigeria.
Political violence is a significant threat to the peaceful coexistence of Nigeria, with a majority of
political hooligans under the influence of drugs (Siro, 2014). Over 60% of people participating in
political violence and drug abuse in Nigeria are youth (Siro, 2014).
Crime and its connection to the well-being of children in our community are intertwined.
Reducing the risks and fostering resilience in children plays a pivotal role in crime reduction.
Challenges arise when broader social, political, and economic systems impact the resources of
families, placing stress on the family unit. Ensuring appropriate care and essential resources for
all children holds significant importance for their long-term physical, intellectual, and emotional
well-being, facilitating their growth into independent, healthy adults.
Tomorrow's offenders often emerge from today's vulnerable children. Vulnerable children are
those at risk of enduring social, emotional, or behavioral issues, often relying on public
resources, such as child welfare, social assistance, corrections, or mental health services
throughout their development. All children, susceptible to potential vulnerability, may develop
emotional or behavioral problems when their internal resources cannot meet the challenges of
their environment.
Three levels of prevention exist:
1. Primary Prevention
Primary prevention focuses on ensuring overall community health by preventing adverse
conditions from emerging. Programs addressing parenting, family support, and adequate housing
qualify as primary prevention if universally accessible before difficulties arise. It proves cost-
effective by reducing long-term costs, with effectiveness reliant on inclusivity and support for at-
risk populations.
2. Secondary Prevention
Secondary prevention intervenes after "warning signs" appear, attempting to halt a crime
before it occurs. Programs targeting specific problems or groups, addressing early signs of anti-
social or delinquent behavior, aim to prevent escalation into serious criminal activity.
14
3. Tertiary Prevention
Law enforcement efforts, categorized as tertiary prevention, aim to prevent crime
recurrence after a known offense. Sentencing individuals to prison ensures a period of non-
criminal activity, but it does not reverse the effects of the original crime.
Crucial to prevention is a commitment to providing adequate care for all children. The CS&CPC
collaborates with the Alliance for Children and Youth of Waterloo Region, focusing on
strengths-based approaches. Preventative efforts aim to reduce long-term emotional and
behavioral issues, promote optimal development in high-risk children, and enhance community
responsiveness to families in need.
Successful prevention programs share common characteristics:
- Enhancing children's mental health and fostering a healthier environment.
- Offering free accessibility to all children.
- Avoiding singling out or stigmatizing individuals, families, or communities.
- Emphasizing education, competence-building, and skill development.
- Actively involving families and communities in development and implementation.
- Maximizing positive outcomes and cost-savings compared to treatment.
Theories explaining drug abuse among youths suggest that certain individuals resort to drugs for
survival due to various factors. As elucidated by Eze and Omeje (1999) in Oluremi (2012), these
theories encompass the Socio-cultural, Biological, and Social Learning perspectives of drug
abuse. The Socio-cultural theory posits that drug abuse is influenced by the socio-cultural values
of a community, where some cultures permit the use of substances like alcohol and marijuana,
especially during specific cultural events. The Biological theory asserts that an individual's
biological or genetic makeup determines vulnerability to drug abuse. The Learning theory views
drug abuse as stemming from an individual's learning process, which could be instrumental,
conditional, or social.
When exploring the implications of youth drug abuse for national security, scholars have
employed various theories. This study adopts the Securitization framework, introduced by Ole
Weaver (1993) and further developed by the Copenhagen School. According to this theory,
national security involves identifying security issues to be addressed through routine politics and
those requiring urgent action, such as youth drug abuse. The securitization theory expands the
15
security agenda beyond traditional threats to encompass non-traditional issues related to societal
needs.
Securitization, as rationalized by Weaver (2000), involves framing issues like drug abuse and
illicit trafficking as national security threats through labeling and discourse. Buzan and Hansen
(2009) distinguish between politicized and securitized national security threats, emphasizing the
emergency measures justified by the need to ensure state survival and citizen protection. In the
context of Nigerian youths' drug abuse, the securitization theory identifies it as a non-traditional
security threat that could escalate into a significant national security challenge if not promptly
addressed. Urgent responses are deemed necessary from Federal, State, and Local Governments,
the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA), the United Nations Office on Drugs and
Crime (UNODC), and other relevant stakeholders at both local and international levels.
16
CHAPTER THREE
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
The research was conducted in Abakiliki Town, located in Ebonyi State, which is one of the 36
states in Nigeria and is part of the five states comprising South Eastern Nigeria. The majority of
the State's population are engaged in farming and trading activities.
17
The SUIT, a succinct seven-item screening questionnaire created by the researcher, was
employed to identify the use of psychoactive substances like alcohol, cigarettes, cannabis,
cocaine, amphetamine-type stimulants, sedatives, hallucinogens, inhalants, opioids, and other
drugs. It is divided into two sections, A and B. Section A, comprising 5 items, focuses on
personal characteristics, while Section B, with two items, explores respondents' substance use.
The first item in Section B lists ten substances adolescents might engage with, and the second
item validates their responses to substance use.
For the Key Informant Question Guide, in-depth interviews were conducted with key community
residents (stakeholders) identified by the researcher using an interview guide. The guide, with
two parts, addressed substance use issues, perceived consequences of youth substance use, and
opinions on approaches to address this issue in the community.
Regarding the Interview Guide for Focus Group Discussion, discussions aimed to engage
community residents in creating local Prevention Action Plans (PAPs) for youths and
establishing collaborative systems to address research objectives. One sample question focused
on community members' perceptions of challenges in preventing adolescent substance use.
18
only 385 out of the 400 distributed questionnaires were returned and included in the analysis, as
15 were incomplete.
A total of 400 surveys were distributed among adolescents, with 385 respondents, resulting in a
response rate of 96.25%. Simultaneously, data collected from interviews with twelve adolescents
and input from eighteen community stakeholders were analyzed and presented based on
identified themes related to preventing adolescent substance use through community-based
programs in Abakiliki Town, Ebonyi State.
19
Among the participants, females (214, 56%) outnumbered males (171, 44%). Analysis by age
range revealed that a majority of respondents fell between 15 to 19 years old, comprising 64.4%
of the participants. The prevalence of substance use among adolescents in Abakiliki Town is
outlined in Table 1. Those who had ever used substances included 128 males (59.5%) and 87
females (40.5%). The data showed that the majority used alcohol (77.7%), followed by tobacco
(12.6%) and cannabis (4.2%). Notably, none of the female respondents had ever used tobacco,
and cannabis use was reported by only 1 female (11.1%) compared to 8 males (88.9%).
However, the pattern of alcohol consumption showed a similar distribution between females (82,
49%) and males (85, 51%). This suggests that alcohol serves as a social drink in most
communities, with no significant gender-based differences.
20
REFERENCES
Abudu, R. V. (2008). Young People and Drugs Abuse: Biennial International Conference on
alcohol, drugs and society in Africa, Abuja, Nigeria. Between 23rd-25th, 2008.
Ajibulu, E. (2011). Eradicating Drug Abuse in Nigeria- How feasible? Retrieved May 24, 2012
from http://www.modernghana.com/news/337520/1/eradicating-drug-abuse-in-nigeriahow-
feasible.html
Akannam, T. (2008). North-West Rank Highest in Drug Addiction. Nigerian Drug Statistics by
Zone. Retrieved May 5, 2012. From http://www.nairaland.com/203955/nigerian-drug-statistics-
zone
Desalu, O. O., Iseh, K. R., Olokoba, A. B., Salawu, F. K., & Danburan, A. (2010). Smokeless
Tobacco use in adult Nigerian population. Journal of clinical practice, 13(4), 382 – 387.
Giade, A. (2011, June 30). How Nigeria’s Latest Drug Abuse Defies Legislat. Daily Trust
NewsPaper. Retrieved from http://www.dailytrust.com.ng/daily/old/index.php/feature/42852-
how-nigerias-latest-drug-abusedefies-legislation
Henry, K. L., Smith, E. A., Caldwell, L. L. (2007). Deterioration of academic achievement and
marijuana use onset among rural adolescents. Journal Health education research, 22(3), 372384.
Igwe, W. C., Ojinnaka, N., Ejiofor, S. O., Emechebe, G. O., and Ibe, B C. (2009).Socio-
Demographic Correlates of Psychoactive Substance Abuse Among Secondary School Students in
Enugu, Nigeria. European Journal of Social Science, 12(2), 277 – 283.
Lakhanpal, P. Agnihotri, A., K. (2007). Drug Abuse an International Problem: A short Review
with Special reference to African Continent. Journal of Medicine and Toxicology, 1(1), 1-11
National Drug Law Enforcement Agency. (2009). Drug Free Club.
Retrived from http://www.ndlea.gov.ng/v1/?q=content/drug-free-club
Oluremi, D. F. (2012). Drug Abuse among Nigerian Adolescents strategies for counselling.
Journal of International Social Research. 5(20), 342 – 347.
Oshodi, O. Y., Aina, O. F., and Onajole, A. T. (2010). Substance use among secondary school
students in an urban setting in Nigeria: prevalence and associated factors. African journal of
psychiatry, 13(1), 52 – 57.
Oshikoya, K. A., Alli, A. (2006). Perception of Drug Abuse Amongst Nigerian Undergraduates.
World Journal of Medical Sciences, 1(2), 133-139.
21
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime. (2007). Drug Abuse and Drug Dependece Treatment
Situation, in
Nigeria. Accoding to UNODC data for the year 2007.
Available at http://www.unodc.org/docs/treatment/CoPro/Web_Nigeria.pdf
United Nations Office on Drugs and Crimes. (2011). World Drug Report. Austria. No.: ISBN
978-92-1-148262-
Brown, S. E., Esbensen, F. A. and Geis, G. (2000) Criminology: Explaining Crime and its
Context, 5th edn, Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
Burke, R. H. (2009) An introduction to Criminological Theory. Willan Publishing: Devon.
Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. London: Routledge.
Cannabis to be allowed to grown, exported in Sri Lanka for medical purposes. (2018, June 25).
Daily News. Retrieved from https://www.dailynews.lk/2018/06/25/local/154973/cannabis-be-
allowed-grown-exported-sri-lanka-medical-purposes
Croall, H. (1998) Crime and Society in Britain. Harlow: Longman.
Crowther, C. (2007) An Introduction to Criminology and Criminal Justice. Basingstoke:
Palgrave Macmillan
Durkheim, E. (1897/1951). Suicide: A Study in Sociology, trans. J.A. Spaulding & G. Simpson.
New York, NY: The Free Press.
Frazer, J. (1922) The Golden Bough. Temple of Earth Publishing. Retrieved from
https://www.templeofearth.com/books/goldenbough.pdf.
Fuller, R. C. (1942) "Morals and the Criminal Law," Journal on Criminal Law, Criminology and
Police Science 32, 624-630
Garofalo, R. (1914) Criminology. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
Geis, G. and Maier, R.F. (eds) (1977) White-collar Crime: Offences in Business, Politics and the
Professions – Classic and Contemporary Views. New York: Free Press.
Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
Gillian, J. L. (1954) Criminology and Penology. USA:1945
Javid, S. (2018) Government announces that medicinal cannabis is legal. News Story, London:
Home Office.
Electronic copy available at: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3864739 12
22
Lacey, N., Wells, C. and Meure, D. (1990) Reconstructing Criminal Law: Critical Social
Perspectives on Crime and the Criminal Process. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson
Lombroso, C. (1875) L’uomo delinquente (The Criminal Man). Milan: Hoepli.
Mars, G. (1982) Cheats at Work: An Anthropology of Workplace Crime. London: George Allen
and Unwin.
Matthew, A. M. (2018) A Sociological Understanding of Deviance, Social Control, and Crime.
Retrieved May 23, 2020, from https://brewminate.com/a-sociological-understanding-of-
deviance-social-control-and-crime/
Michael, J., and Adler, M. J. (1933). Crime, Law and Social Science. Harcourt: Brace.
Miller, J. M. (2009) 21st Century Criminology: A Reference Handbook. SAGE Publications, Inc.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric, and social constructionism. London:
Sage.
Quinney (2014), Is Criminal Behaviour Deviant Behaviour? (Penn University)
Schraeger, L. S. and Short, J. F. (1978) ‘Towards a Sociology of Organisational Crime’, Social
Problems, 25: 407–19
Schwendinger, H. and Schwendinger, J. (1970) ‘Defenders of Order or Guardians of Human
Rights’, Issues in Criminology, 7: 72–81.
Sellin, T. (1938). Culture conflict and crime. New York: Social Science Research Council.
Stam, H. (2001). Introduction: Social construction and its critics. Theory and Psychology, 11,
291–296.
Sutherland, E. H. (1947) Principles of Criminology, 4th edition. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott.
Sutherland, E.H. and Cressey, D.R. (1978) Criminology, 10th edition. Philadelphia, PA:
Lippincott.
Tappan, P. (1947) Who is criminal? American Sociological Review, 12, 96–102.
Wells, C. (1993) Corporations and Criminal Responsibility. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
23