Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2. a) National Public Radio dates back to the 1920’s—prior to the New Deal; it is still
in effect today.
b) Medicare was the result of legislation from the 1960’s—30 years after the New
Deal; it is still in effect today.
c) Social Security legislation was part of the New Deal; it is still in effect today.
d) The Federal minimum wage was part of the New Deal; it is still in effect today.
e) The Environmental Protection Agency dates back to the beginning of the 1970’s
almost 40 years after the New Deal; it is still in effect today.
1
© 2018 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
they do so haphazardly or irresponsibly, it could be that some consumers are
worse off because they purchase a product of lower quality, albeit at a lower
price.
Requiring trucking companies to only buy new trucks that are low-pollution is an
example of a command-and-control approach. The other examples provide incentives,
but do not directly specify certain market outcomes and activities to achieve desirable
goals.
c) This outcome is not desirable for the economy or for the taxpayers of the town.
Resources were spent on securing the contract for Company B, but the taxpayers
did not get anything in return for these resources. If the contract had been
awarded based on merit alone, these resources would not have been wasted and
the taxpayers would have gotten better quality at a better price. The waste of
resources is bad for the economy; the forgone better quality and better price is bad
for the taxpayers.
2
© 2018 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
6. a) This would raise the price that consumers pay for fatty foods. The graph should
look like the one below. With no tax, the market equilibrium is at point A. With a
tax, buyers pay more, and sellers receive less. The tax reduces the equilibrium
quantity in the market.
b) Because the prices of fatty foods would increase more than the prices of low-fat
foods, consumers would likely substitute away from fatty foods and towards low-
fat foods. This would cause a decrease in the amount of fatty foods that
consumers buy.
c) The prices of nonfatty foods would also increase. Fatty foods and nonfatty foods
are substitutes. So, when the price of fatty foods increases, consumers decide that
they will buy more nonfatty foods at every given price, which is an increase in
demand, or a rightward shift of the demand curve. This causes an increase in both
equilibrium price and equilibrium quantity of nonfatty foods.
7. a) If a student sends 10 emails per day, 15 text messages per day, and 25 instant
messages per day, this student sends 50 messages per day. The total tax paid
would be 50 × $0.05 = $2.50 per day.
b) It should be expected that this tax would discourage at least some messaging.
Presumably, less important messages would not be sent.
c) If spammers have to pay 5 cents for each spam message they send out, then they
will only send spam messages if they expect to earn 5 cents or more in return.
(Currently, spamming is basically free, so the expected return can be very low and
it is still a smart business decision.) This regulation would seriously reduce the
3
© 2018 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
amount of spam messages sent. This is a desirable outcome, but most email
clients and software packages have spam-blocking capabilities built in. Also,
spam, while annoying, is certainly easy to delete. The increased cost on
consumers and the reduction in legitimate emails, text messages and instant
messages would likely have a negative effect that is far too great to justify the
small positive effect of discouraging spam. (Students might also point out that
those hurt by the tax are those who send a lot of messages, while everyone is
helped equally by the reduction of income and other taxes. Therefore, this tax has
a redistributive effect. Since students and younger people may send more text and
instant messages, it is likely to redistribute income from the poor to the wealthy.)
b) The primary justification for this program would be redistribution. Because this
program is funded through taxation, it is paid for by those who pay taxes. Tax
receipts come disproportionately from income earners with high incomes. These
people who essentially fund food stamp programs do not benefit from the
program, so income is redistributed from the wealthy to the poor. A secondary
justification could be that poverty causes a negative externality. People who
cannot afford food sometimes become desperate, and poverty can lead to crime.
Or one could argue that the thought that some members of society (especially
children or the elderly) are going without necessary nutrition is unsettling to many
people. Either way, food stamps help to eliminate some of the negative
externalities associated with poverty.
c) The primary justification for libraries would be that they are public goods. Since
private firms will find it difficult to earn a profit by providing free access to books
and reference materials, the private market is unlikely to provide libraries, so it
falls on government (or charitable organizations) to provide this service. It could
also be argued that learning—which is fostered by a library system—has positive
externalities associated with it, and that these externalities (like a more educated,
informed electorate, for example) are increased when the government provides
libraries.
4
© 2018 by McGraw-Hill Education. This is proprietary material solely for authorized instructor use. Not authorized for sale or distribution in any
manner. This document may not be copied, scanned, duplicated, forwarded, distributed, or posted on a website, in whole or part.
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
LOPPULAUSE.
Updated editions will replace the previous one—the old editions will
be renamed.
1.D. The copyright laws of the place where you are located also
govern what you can do with this work. Copyright laws in most
countries are in a constant state of change. If you are outside the
United States, check the laws of your country in addition to the terms
of this agreement before downloading, copying, displaying,
performing, distributing or creating derivative works based on this
work or any other Project Gutenberg™ work. The Foundation makes
no representations concerning the copyright status of any work in
any country other than the United States.
• You pay a royalty fee of 20% of the gross profits you derive from
the use of Project Gutenberg™ works calculated using the
method you already use to calculate your applicable taxes. The
fee is owed to the owner of the Project Gutenberg™ trademark,
but he has agreed to donate royalties under this paragraph to
the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive Foundation. Royalty
payments must be paid within 60 days following each date on
which you prepare (or are legally required to prepare) your
periodic tax returns. Royalty payments should be clearly marked
as such and sent to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation at the address specified in Section 4, “Information
about donations to the Project Gutenberg Literary Archive
Foundation.”
• You comply with all other terms of this agreement for free
distribution of Project Gutenberg™ works.
1.F.
1.F.4. Except for the limited right of replacement or refund set forth in
paragraph 1.F.3, this work is provided to you ‘AS-IS’, WITH NO
OTHER WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PURPOSE.
Please check the Project Gutenberg web pages for current donation
methods and addresses. Donations are accepted in a number of
other ways including checks, online payments and credit card
donations. To donate, please visit: www.gutenberg.org/donate.
Most people start at our website which has the main PG search
facility: www.gutenberg.org.