Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
The Impact of Digital Resources on Government
and Private School Education Systems
Pardip Kaur1; Dr. Payare Lal2
Research Scholar1; Professor2
Department of Library & Information Science
Desh Bhagat University, Mandi Gobindgarh (Punjab)
Abstract:- The integration of digital resources into
educational systems has transformed the landscape of
teaching and learning. This research paper explores the
impact of digital resources on both government and
private school education systems. The study employs a
mixed-methods approach, combining surveys,
interviews, and case studies to comprehensively assess
the implications of digital integration.
The literature review provides a historical context
of digital integration in education, highlighting the
evolution of technology in both government and private
school settings. A comparative analysis reveals
distinctions in the adoption rates, challenges faced, and
existing studies on the effectiveness of digital resources
in these two educational spheres.
The methodology section outlines the research
design, sampling strategy, and data collection methods
employed to gather insights from educators,
administrators, and students. Digital resources,
including smartboards, online platforms, and e-books,
are categorized and examined, shedding light on the
varied approaches taken by government and private
schools in their adoption.
The impact on teaching and learning is explored,
elucidating changes in pedagogical methods, student
engagement, and academic performance. Infrastructure
and access disparities between government and private
schools are discussed, along with initiatives aimed at
mitigating the digital divide. The role of professional
development for educators in acquiring digital skills is
emphasized, highlighting its importance in successful
integration.
The paper delves into the policy and governance
frameworks that support or hinder the implementation
of digital resources. Case studies offer specific examples
of successful integration in government and private
schools, showcasing innovative approaches and lessons
learned. The study also identifies ongoing challenges and
proposes potential solutions, concluding with
recommendations for future research directions and the
continued enhancement of digital education in
government and private school systems.
Keywords:- Education, Resources, Digital.
IJISRT24JAN020 www.ijisrt.com
I. INTRODUCTION
In the 21st century, the pervasive influence of
technology has dynamically altered the landscape of
education, with digital resources emerging as transformative
tools in the teaching and learning process. This research
delves into the consequential impact of digital resources on
education systems, specifically exploring the divergent
trajectories within government and private schools. As
educational paradigms continue to evolve, understanding
how these institutions harness digital tools becomes
imperative for shaping effective policies and practices.
 Background and Context: The historical trajectory of
education has been marked by periods of innovation, and
the current era is no exception. The advent of digital
resources - encompassing interactive smart boards,
online platforms, e-books, and diverse applications - has
ushered in an era where traditional teaching methods are
augmented or, in some cases, revolutionized. This
research situates itself within this context, seeking to
comprehend how the integration of digital resources
shapes the educational experience in government and
private schools.
 Overview of Education Systems: Government and
private schools represent distinct spheres within the
educational landscape, each governed by unique
structures, funding mechanisms, and administrative
frameworks. This study acknowledges the diversity
inherent in these systems and aims to dissect the nuanced
ways in which digital resources impact teaching,
learning, and overall educational outcomes.
 Statement of the Research Problem: As digital
resources permeate classrooms, a critical examination is
required to discern their implications for both
government and private schools. While literature
highlights the potential benefits, it also underscores
challenges related to equity, infrastructure, and
pedagogical adaptation. This research aims to contribute
to the existing body of knowledge by offering a
comprehensive analysis of the impact of digital
resources in the context of diverse educational settings.
 Significance of the Study: The importance of this
research lies in its potential to inform educational
policies, guide decision-makers, and inspire educators to
adapt to the evolving educational landscape. By
understanding the differential impact on government and
private schools, stakeholders can tailor interventions that
cater to the unique needs and challenges of each setting,
fostering a more equitable and effective educational
environment.
1
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2024
II. FUNCTIONS
The functions of digital resources in government and
private school education systems are multifaceted,
encompassing various aspects of teaching, learning,
administration, and overall educational efficacy. Here are
key functions associated with the integration of digital
resources in these educational settings:
A. Enhanced Teaching Methods:
 Interactive Learning: Digital resources enable teachers to
engage students interactively, fostering a more
participatory learning environment through tools like
smartboards, multimedia presentations, and educational
software.
 Personalized Instruction: Adaptive digital platforms
allow for tailored learning experiences, addressing
individual student needs and pacing, which is
particularly beneficial in diverse classrooms.
B. Accessible Learning Materials:
 E-books and Online Resources: Digital resources
facilitate easy access to a wealth of educational
materials, including e-books, articles, and online
resources, reducing the dependence on traditional
textbooks and broadening the scope of learning materials
available to students.
C. Student Engagement and Motivation:
 Gamification: Educational games and interactive
simulations can be integrated into the curriculum,
enhancing student engagement and motivation by
making learning more enjoyable and relevant.
Multimedia Content: The use of multimedia elements,
such as videos and animations, can make complex
concepts more accessible and engaging for students.
D. Administrative Efficiency:
 Data Management: Digital resources streamline
administrative tasks, including student records,
attendance tracking, and grading, promoting efficient
data management and reducing paperwork for educators.
 Communication Platforms: Digital tools facilitate
communication between teachers, students, and parents,
creating a more transparent and collaborative educational
environment.
E. Professional Development for Educators:
 Training Programs: Digital resources provide
opportunities for teachers to enhance their digital literacy
and teaching skills through training programs, ensuring
that educators are well-equipped to integrate technology
effectively into their classrooms.
F. Infrastructure Development:
 Technological Infrastructure: The adoption of digital
resources often necessitates the development of robust
technological infrastructure in schools, including high-
speed internet, computer labs, and other facilities,
contributing to the overall modernization of educational
institutions.
IJISRT24JAN020
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
G. Addressing Learning Diversity:
 Inclusive Education: Digital tools can be customized to
cater to diverse learning needs, including those of
students with special needs. This inclusivity is crucial for
creating an equitable educational environment.
H. Preparation for the Digital Age:
 Digital Literacy: Integrating digital resources prepares
students for the demands of the digital age, equipping
them with essential digital literacy skills that are
increasingly vital in the modern workforce.
I. Global Collaboration:
 Virtual Learning Environments: Digital resources
facilitate global collaboration by connecting students
with peers and educators from around the world,
fostering cross-cultural understanding and collaboration
on projects and initiatives.
J. Continuous Assessment and Feedback:
 Online Assessment Tools: Digital resources enable
continuous assessment through online quizzes, tests, and
interactive assignments, providing real-time feedback to
both students and teachers.
III. SCOPE
Understanding and harnessing these functions
effectively can contribute to the successful integration of
digital resources in government and private school education
systems, ultimately enhancing the quality and relevance of
education in the digital era.
The scope of digital resources in government and
private school education systems is expansive,
encompassing various dimensions that influence teaching,
learning, administration, and overall educational outcomes.
Here are key aspects that define the scope of digital
resources in these educational settings:
A. Teaching and Learning:
 Curriculum Enhancement: Digital resources offer
opportunities to enrich the curriculum with multimedia
content, interactive simulations, and online learning
modules, providing students with a more dynamic and
engaging learning experience.
 Adaptive Learning Platforms: The scope extends to
adaptive learning platforms that cater to individual
student needs, allowing for personalized learning
experiences and addressing diverse learning styles.
B. Professional Development:
 Teacher Training: Digital resources provide a platform
for ongoing professional development, offering teachers
opportunities to enhance their digital literacy skills and
incorporate innovative teaching methodologies into their
practices.
www.ijisrt.com 2
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2024
C. Accessibility and Inclusivity:
 Addressing Learning Diversity: Digital resources play
a crucial role in creating inclusive learning
environments, allowing for customization to meet the
diverse needs of students, including those with varying
learning abilities.
D. Administrative Efficiency:
 Data Management: The scope includes the streamlining
of administrative tasks through digital tools, such as
electronic record-keeping systems, attendance tracking,
and automated grading, reducing the administrative
burden on educators.
 Communication Platforms: Digital resources facilitate
efficient communication among teachers, students, and
parents, fostering a collaborative and transparent
educational ecosystem.
E. Infrastructure Development:
 Technological Infrastructure: The scope extends to the
development of robust technological infrastructure
within schools, including high-speed internet, computer
labs, and devices, to support the seamless integration of
digital resources.
F. Global Connectivity:
 Virtual Learning Environments: Digital resources
enable schools to connect globally, fostering
collaboration between students and educators from
different regions. Virtual exchanges and collaborative
projects become feasible, promoting cross-cultural
understanding.
G. Assessment and Feedback:
 Continuous Assessment: Digital resources allow for
continuous assessment through online quizzes, tests, and
interactive assignments, providing timely feedback to
both students and educators.
 Data-Driven Decision-Making: The scope includes the
use of data analytics to inform educational decision-
making, allowing institutions to identify trends, assess
student performance, and implement targeted
interventions.
H. Parental Involvement:
 Parent-Teacher Communication: Digital resources
facilitate communication between teachers and parents
through online platforms, keeping parents informed
about their child's progress, assignments, and overall
school activities.
I. Preparation for the Future:
 Digital Literacy Skills: The scope extends to equipping
students with essential digital literacy skills, preparing
them for the demands of a digitally-driven future
workforce.
J. Resource Management:
 E-Books and Online Libraries: Digital resources
encompass the creation and utilization of e-books, online
libraries, and educational repositories, reducing the
IJISRT24JAN020 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
reliance on traditional textbooks and expanding access to
a wide array of learning materials.
Understanding the comprehensive scope of digital
resources in government and private school education
systems is essential for educators, administrators,
policymakers, and other stakeholders as they navigate the
integration of technology to enhance the quality and
effectiveness of education.
IV. DIFFERENTIATE BETWEEN DIGITAL
RESOURCES ON GOVERNMENT AND
PRIVATE SCHOOL EDUCATION SYSTEMS
The integration of digital resources in government and
private school education systems can exhibit differences in
various aspects, including access to technology, funding,
administrative structures, and policy frameworks. Here are
the key differences between digital resources in government
and private school education systems:
A. Funding and Resources:
 Government Schools: Government schools may face
budget constraints, impacting their ability to invest in
advanced technological infrastructure and a wide range
of digital resources. They often rely on government
funding, which may be limited compared to the financial
resources available to private institutions.
 Private Schools: Private schools typically have more
financial autonomy and can allocate larger budgets for
technology integration. This allows them to invest in
state-of-the-art digital resources, such as interactive
whiteboards, cutting-edge software, and a variety of
educational technologies.
B. Technological Infrastructure:
 Government Schools: In some cases, government
schools may lack the necessary technological
infrastructure, including high-speed internet, computer
labs, and devices, which can impact the seamless
integration of digital resources.
 Private Schools: Private schools are generally better
positioned to invest in and maintain robust technological
infrastructure, facilitating smoother integration of digital
resources into daily educational practices.
C. Access to Devices:
 Government Schools: Students in government schools
may face challenges in terms of personal access to
digital devices outside of the classroom. Limited access
to computers or tablets can influence the extent to which
digital resources are utilized for homework or individual
study.
 Private Schools: Private schools may provide students
with greater access to personal digital devices, ensuring
that they can fully engage with digital resources both
inside and outside the classroom.
D. Policy and Regulation:
 Government Schools: Integration of digital resources in
government schools is often influenced by broader
educational policies and regulations set by government
3
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2024
bodies. These policies may vary across regions and
impact the flexibility of implementation.
 Private Schools: Private schools have more autonomy
in setting their educational policies and can often adapt
more quickly to emerging trends and technologies
without waiting for government mandates.
E. Teacher Training and Support:
 Government Schools: Teachers in government schools
may face challenges in terms of receiving adequate
training and support for the effective integration of
digital resources. Limited professional development
opportunities can hinder the implementation of
technology in the classroom.
 Private Schools: Private schools may have more
resources to invest in teacher training programs, ensuring
that educators are well-equipped to leverage digital
resources effectively for instructional purposes.
F. Curriculum Customization:
 Government Schools: Curriculum customization may
be more constrained in government schools due to
standardized testing and curricular requirements
mandated by educational authorities.
 Private Schools: Private schools often have more
flexibility in designing and customizing their curriculum,
allowing for a more tailored integration of digital
resources aligned with specific educational goals.
G. Socioeconomic Factors:
 Government Schools: Students in government schools
may come from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds,
impacting their access to digital devices and the internet
outside of school.
 Private Schools: Private school students may, on
average, come from higher socioeconomic backgrounds,
potentially having more resources for personal digital
devices and a conducive home environment for utilizing
digital resources.
While these differences exist, it's essential to note that
the digital divide is a complex issue, and efforts are being
made globally to bridge these gaps and ensure equitable
access to digital resources in education. Both government
and private schools can benefit from strategic planning and
collaboration to maximize the positive impact of digital
resources on student learning outcomes.
V. ROLE OF DIGITAL RESOURCES IN
GOVERNMENT AND PRIVATE SCHOOL
EDUCATION SYSTEMS
The role of digital resources in government and private
school education systems is instrumental in shaping modern
education, enhancing teaching and learning practices, and
preparing students for the demands of the digital age. Here
are the key roles that digital resources play in both
government and private school settings:
IJISRT24JAN020 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
A. Enhanced Teaching Methods:
 Government Schools: Digital resources empower
educators in government schools to adopt innovative
teaching methods, incorporating multimedia
presentations, interactive simulations, and online
educational platforms to make lessons more engaging
and effective.
 Private Schools: In private schools, the availability of
more extensive financial resources often allows for the
adoption of cutting-edge digital tools and technologies,
further enhancing the diversity and depth of teaching
methods.
B. Student Engagement and Motivation:
 Government Schools: Digital resources play a crucial
role in capturing the attention of students in government
schools, making lessons more interactive and enjoyable,
thereby increasing student engagement and motivation.
 Private Schools: Private schools can leverage a wider
array of digital tools to create immersive learning
experiences, catering to diverse learning preferences and
sustaining high levels of student motivation.
C. Accessibility to Learning Materials:
 Government Schools: Digital resources provide
government schools with the ability to offer a more
extensive range of learning materials, including e-books,
online articles, and educational videos, reducing reliance
on traditional textbooks and broadening access to
resources.
 Private Schools: Private schools, often having more
financial flexibility, can invest in comprehensive digital
libraries, ensuring students have access to a wealth of
educational content beyond the traditional curriculum.
D. Personalized Learning:
 Government Schools: Digital resources enable
government schools to implement personalized learning
approaches, catering to individual student needs,
adapting content based on learning styles, and offering
additional support where required.
 Private Schools: Private schools, with their greater
resources, can invest in advanced adaptive learning
platforms that provide highly personalized learning
experiences, further tailoring education to individual
student abilities and preferences.
E. Administrative Efficiency:
 Government Schools: Digital resources streamline
administrative tasks in government schools, such as
attendance tracking, grade management, and
communication with parents, improving overall
administrative efficiency.
 Private Schools: Private schools, often equipped with
more advanced management systems, can benefit from
enhanced administrative tools, contributing to smoother
operational processes.
4
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2024
F. Professional Development for Educators:
 Government Schools: Digital resources facilitate
ongoing professional development for educators in
government schools, ensuring they stay updated on
technological advancements and effective integration
strategies.
 Private Schools: Private schools, with potentially more
resources, can invest in comprehensive training
programs, empowering educators to maximize the
impact of digital resources on teaching and learning.
G. Infrastructure Development:
 Government Schools: The integration of digital
resources in government schools often involves the
development of necessary technological infrastructure,
including the provision of computer labs, internet
connectivity, and devices.
 Private Schools: Private schools, with greater financial
capabilities, can invest in state-of-the-art technological
infrastructure, ensuring a seamless and robust
environment for the effective use of digital resources.
H. Global Connectivity:
 Government Schools: Digital resources enable
government schools to connect globally, fostering
collaboration with schools and students from different
regions, and promoting cultural exchange and global
awareness.
 Private Schools: Private schools, with potentially more
extensive networks, can facilitate advanced global
connectivity initiatives, expanding opportunities for
international collaborations and learning experiences.
I. Assessment and Feedback:
 Government Schools: Digital resources enable
continuous assessment in government schools, allowing
for online quizzes, tests, and interactive assignments that
provide timely feedback to both students and educators.
 Private Schools: Private schools, with potentially more
sophisticated assessment tools, can implement advanced
data analytics to derive insights, further enhancing the
quality of feedback provided.
J. Preparation for the Digital Age:
 Government Schools: The integration of digital
resources in government schools prepares students for
the digital age by imparting essential digital literacy
skills, enhancing their readiness for the technologically
driven workforce.
 Private Schools: Private schools, with greater resources,
can often provide more comprehensive programs that go
beyond basic digital literacy, preparing students for
advanced technological challenges and opportunities.
VI. CRITICISM
While digital resources have significantly transformed
education, there are criticisms and challenges associated
with their integration into both government and private
school education systems. It's important to acknowledge
these criticisms to inform ongoing discussions and
improvements. Some of the common criticisms include:
IJISRT24JAN020 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
A. Digital Divide:
 Issue: One of the most significant criticisms is the
digital divide, where students in economically
disadvantaged areas may lack access to the necessary
devices and high-speed internet required for effective
digital learning.
 Impact: This disparity exacerbates educational
inequalities, hindering the ability of some students to
benefit fully from digital resources and participate
equally in the digital learning environment.
B. Inequitable Access:
 Issue: In some cases, even if devices are provided, there
might be insufficient training or support for educators
and students to use digital resources effectively, leading
to inequitable access and utilization.
 Impact: This can result in a situation where the potential
benefits of digital resources are not fully realized across
all demographic groups, contributing to educational
disparities.
C. Overemphasis on Technology:
 Issue: Critics argue that an overemphasis on digital
resources may lead to a neglect of other crucial aspects
of education, such as interpersonal skills, critical
thinking, and creativity, which are not always addressed
adequately by digital tools.
 Impact: Focusing too much on technology might
diminish the importance of holistic education and
overlook the development of essential non-digital skills.
D. Pedagogical Concerns:
 Issue: Some critics express concerns that digital
resources might promote passive learning or over-
reliance on pre-packaged content, potentially limiting
opportunities for active student engagement and critical
thinking.
 Impact: If not used thoughtfully, digital resources might
contribute to a more traditional, teacher-centric approach
to education rather than facilitating student-centered,
inquiry-based learning.
E. Cost Implications:
 Issue: The initial costs of implementing digital
resources, including purchasing devices, software
licenses, and providing training, can be a significant
financial burden for both government and private
schools.
 Impact: Schools with limited budgets may struggle to
afford the necessary infrastructure and may divert
resources from other essential educational needs.
F. Security and Privacy Concerns:
 Issue: The use of digital resources raises concerns about
data security and student privacy. Inadequate safeguards
may expose sensitive student information to
unauthorized access or compromise.
 Impact: The fear of data breaches and privacy violations
can erode trust among parents, educators, and students,
potentially hindering the adoption of digital resources.
5
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2024
G. Teacher Resistance:
 Issue: Some educators may resist the integration of
digital resources due to a lack of training, fear of
technology replacing their role, or skepticism about the
effectiveness of digital tools.
 Impact: Teacher resistance can hinder the successful
implementation of digital resources, as educator buy-in
is crucial for their effective integration into the teaching
and learning process.
H. Dependence on Internet Connectivity:
 Issue: Reliance on internet connectivity for accessing
digital resources can be problematic in areas with
inconsistent or unreliable internet access.
 Impact: Students and educators may face disruptions in
learning, and instructional continuity may be
compromised when internet connectivity is unreliable.
I. Rapid Technological Obsolescence:
 Issue: The rapid pace of technological advancements
may lead to the obsolescence of digital resources,
requiring frequent updates and replacements.
 Impact: This can strain budgets and create challenges in
maintaining compatibility with evolving technological
standards.
J. Standardization Concerns:
 Issue: Some argue that the standardization of digital
resources may lead to a one-size-fits-all approach,
neglecting the diverse learning needs and preferences of
students.
 Impact: A lack of customization and personalization in
digital resources may limit their effectiveness in
addressing the unique requirements of individual
learners.
VII. CONCLUSION
In conclusion, the integration of digital resources in
government and private school education systems has
ushered in a transformative era, shaping the landscape of
teaching and learning. While these technologies have
brought about numerous benefits, it is essential to recognize
the challenges and complexities associated with their
implementation. The following key points summarize the
overarching implications of digital resources in education:
A. Transformation of Teaching and Learning:
Digital resources have redefined pedagogical
approaches, offering interactive and engaging methods that
cater to diverse learning styles. Both government and private
schools have witnessed a paradigm shift toward more
dynamic and student-centered educational practices.
B. Addressing Educational Inequalities
The digital divide remains a pressing concern,
particularly in government schools where access to
technology may be limited. Bridging this gap requires
concerted efforts to ensure equitable access to digital
resources for all students, irrespective of socio-economic
background.
IJISRT24JAN020 www.ijisrt.com
International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
C. Innovative Administrative Practices:
Digital resources have streamlined administrative tasks,
enhancing efficiency in both government and private
schools. From attendance tracking to communication with
parents, these tools contribute to a more effective and
transparent educational administration.
D. Challenges in Implementation:
The implementation of digital resources is not without
challenges. Issues such as the digital divide, inadequate
teacher training, and privacy concerns pose significant
hurdles that demand attention and strategic solutions to
ensure effective integration.
E. Balancing Technology and Pedagogy:
Striking a balance between leveraging technology and
preserving effective pedagogical practices is crucial. Critics
argue against an overemphasis on digital tools at the
expense of holistic education, emphasizing the importance
of cultivating critical thinking and interpersonal skills.
F. Financial Considerations:
Financial considerations play a pivotal role in the
successful integration of digital resources. Private schools,
with more extensive financial resources, often have a
competitive advantage in adopting cutting-edge
technologies, while government schools face budgetary
constraints that may limit their capabilities.
G. Data Security and Privacy:
The use of digital resources raises legitimate concerns
about data security and student privacy. Both government
and private schools must prioritize robust safeguards to
protect sensitive information and build trust among
stakeholders.
H. Teacher Professional Development:
Effective integration of digital resources hinges on
comprehensive teacher professional development. Ensuring
that educators are well-equipped with the skills to leverage
technology is crucial for maximizing the benefits of digital
tools in the classroom.
I. Adapting to Evolving Technologies:
The rapid pace of technological evolution poses
challenges related to the potential obsolescence of digital
resources. Schools must adapt to emerging technologies and
commit to continuous updates to ensure relevance and
effectiveness.
J. Customization and Inclusivity:
Striving for customization in digital resources is
essential to address the diverse learning needs of students.
The one-size-fits-all approach may neglect individual
differences, emphasizing the need for personalized,
inclusive educational experiences.
In navigating these complexities, it is evident that both
government and private schools have critical roles to play in
shaping the future of education. Collaboration, thoughtful
policies, and a commitment to addressing disparities are
essential for realizing the full potential of digital resources
in fostering a dynamic and inclusive educational
6
Volume 9, Issue 1, January 2024 International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology
ISSN No:-2456-2165
environment. By acknowledging the challenges and building ki/Sustained_Blended_Professional_Development_in_t
on the successes, educational stakeholders can work he_21st_Century
together to create a balanced, technology-enhanced [15]. Attwell, G. (2007). Personal learning environments—
educational landscape that prepares students for the The future of e-learning? eLearning Papers,2(1), 1–8.
complexities of the digital era. [16]. Barnett, H. (2002). How to guarantee a learning return
on your technology investment. eSchool News, 1–5.
REFERENCES [17]. Bauer, J., & Kenton, J. (2005). Toward technology
integration in the schools: Why it isn’t happening.
[1]. Alberta Education. (2013). Learning and Technology Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(4),
Policy Framework 2013. Edmonton, AB, Canada: 519–546.
Alberta Education, School Technology Branch. [18]. OFFICE OF Educational Technology 93
Retrieved from [19]. Bolam, R., McMahon, A., Stoll, L., Thomas, S., &
http://www.education.alberta.ca/media/7792655/learni Wallace, M. (2005). Creating and sustaining effective
ng-and-technology-policy-framework-web.pdf professional learning communities (Research Report
[2]. Alliance for Excellent Education. (2012). The digital No. 637). Bristol, England: University of Bristol.
learning imperative: How technology and teaching Retrieved from http://dera.ioe.ac.uk/5622/1/RR637.pdf
meet today’s education challenges. Retrieved from
http://all4ed.org/wp-
content/uploads/2012/01/DigitalLearningImperative.pd
f
[3]. American Association of School Administrators.
(2010). 2011 District Excellence Award for
digitallearning.
[4]. Retrievedfromhttp://www.aasa.org/uploadedFiles/Prog
rams_and_Events/Awards_and_Scholarships/Technolo
gy_Award/2011_Technology_Award/2011_Technolog
y_Award2011
[5]. AASA_LS_App_procedure_082410.pdf
[6]. Amirian, S. (2007). Digital backpacks: Facilitating
faculty implementation of technologies for teaching
and learning. Computers in the Schools, 24(1/2), 5–14.
[7]. Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. L. (2000). School
technology leadership: Incidence and impact.
[8]. Irvine: University of California, Center for Research
on Information Technology and
[9]. Organizations. Retrieved from
http://escholarship.org/uc/item/76s142fc#page-7
[10]. Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. L. (2005). School
technology leadership: An empirical investigation of
prevalence and effect. Educational Administration
Quarterly, 41(1), 49–82.
[11]. Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (Eds.). (2004). The theory
and practice of online learning. Athabasca, AB,
Canada: Athabasca University Press.
[12]. Annenberg Institute for School Reform. (2004).
Professional learning communities: Professional
development strategies that improve instruction.
Providence, RI: Author. Retrieved from http://
www.annenberginstitute.org/pdf/proflearning.pdf
[13]. Argueta, R., Huff, J., Tingen, J., & Corn, J. O. (2011).
Laptop initiatives: Summary of research across seven
states (Friday Institute White Paper No. 4). Raleigh:
North Carolina State University, the William & Ida
Friday Institute for Educational Innovation. Retrieved
from https://www.fi.ncsu.edu/wp-
content/uploads/2013/05/laptop-initiatives-summary-
of-research-across-seven-states.pdf
[14]. Armstrong, M., & Earle, L. (2012). Sustained blended
professional development in the
21stcentury.Retrievedfromhttp://etec.ctlt.ubc.ca/510wi

IJISRT24JAN020 www.ijisrt.com 7