The document discusses the Panama Papers investigation, which revealed how some wealthy individuals hid money in offshore accounts. It asks questions about what the investigation entailed, why it was important by underlining key details, how the whistleblower feels now given safety concerns, and what conclusions they drew years later. It also prompts comparing the Panama Papers whistleblower to Julian Assange to discuss the role of whistleblowers.
The document discusses the Panama Papers investigation, which revealed how some wealthy individuals hid money in offshore accounts. It asks questions about what the investigation entailed, why it was important by underlining key details, how the whistleblower feels now given safety concerns, and what conclusions they drew years later. It also prompts comparing the Panama Papers whistleblower to Julian Assange to discuss the role of whistleblowers.
The document discusses the Panama Papers investigation, which revealed how some wealthy individuals hid money in offshore accounts. It asks questions about what the investigation entailed, why it was important by underlining key details, how the whistleblower feels now given safety concerns, and what conclusions they drew years later. It also prompts comparing the Panama Papers whistleblower to Julian Assange to discuss the role of whistleblowers.
1. Explain what the Panama Papers investigation was. 2. Underline the sentences/words that justify that it was an important investigation. 3. Focus on the whistleblower. Do they feel safe? Justify. 4. What conclusion do they draw 6 years after the event? Compare John Doe to Julian Assange
What do these two documents tell about the role of