Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Effective Group Discussion Theory and Practice 14th Edition Ebook PDF
Effective Group Discussion Theory and Practice 14th Edition Ebook PDF
GLORIA J.
GALANES
VIII Contents
Second-Guess the Tentative Choice Before Fully Negotiating Principled Agreement 338
Committing to It 291
Step 5 of P-MOPS: Implementing the Solution
Chosen 292
Use PERT to Keep Track of Implementation
Details 292
Tailoring P-MOPS to Fit a Specific
Problem 294
Problem Characteristics 296
Using Technology to Help a Group’s Problem
Solving and Decision Making 301
General Tools 301
Computer Technology Designed for Group
Problem Solving 304
Questions for Review 308
Key Terms 309
Bibliography 309
Notes 309
P A R T V ____________
Group Observation and
Evaluation Tools 349
12 Tools for Assessing and
Evaluating Groups 351
Central Message 351
Study Objectives 351
Internal Assessment: Members Evaluate the
Group 354
Self-Assessment 354
Member and Group Assessment 356
Calling for Outside Help: The
Consultant 366
Practice First 367
Reminding 367
Teaching 368
Cri tiqu i ng 3 68
Giving Feedback 368
Planning the Consultation 369
Ethical Principles for Consultants 371
More Instruments for Observing and
Consulting 372
Verbal Interaction Analysis 372
Content Analysis 374
SYMLOG: Drawing a Snapshot of a Group 377
Questions for Review 381
Key Terms 381
Bibliography 382
Notes 382
X Contents
Features
Case Studies: Each chapter begins with a case study illustrating
that chapter’s main points. These are real-life stories designed to
help students retain key concepts and understand how that chap-
ter’s information is relevant to the real world. We link these case
studies explicitly to information presented throughout the chapter.
Recap Boxes: We have placed Recap boxes—internal summaries—
throughout each chapter. They provide logical “breathing places”
for students to review what they have learned.
Emphasis on Diversity: The importance of diversity and intercultural
communication cannot be overemphasized! In addition to a chapter
devoted to this topic, relevant information about diversity is
distributed throughout the text, and we have provided a more
global perspective that reflects our changing world.
Learning Aids: Each chapter includes learning objectives and margin
key terms, which are boldfaced in the text. The end of chapter
material includes Questions for Review and a Bibliography that
provides additional reading material. The Glossary at the end
of the text provides definitions of all key terms.
Online Learning Center at www.mhhe.com/galanesl4e provides
online activities for students that supplement the topics in the
chapter. Tools and activities include interactive quizzes, and glos-
sary flashcards. Videos covering Nonverbal Messages, Defensive/
Supportive Communication, Aggressive/Assertive Communication,
The Employment Interview, Small Group Communication, and
Presentation are also available.
Gloria J. Galanes
Katherine Adams
Acknowledgments
written
have used Effective Group Discussion. We welcome your
reactions to its content and composition. You can send your com-
ments to us via the Department of Communication, Missouri State Univer-
sity, Springfield, Missouri; or the Department of Communication, California
State University, Fresno, California.
May all your groups be enjoyable and satisfying!
Numerous people contributed to this book; we can name only a few.
First, we acknowledge our debt to instructors and writers Freed Bales, Ernest
Bormann, Elton S. Carter, B. Aubrey Fisher, Larry Frey, Kenneth Hance, Randy
Hirokawa, Sidney J. Parnes, J. Donald Phillips, M. Scott Poole, Linda Putnam,
Marvin Shaw, Victor Wall, and W. Woodford Zimmerman.
Finally, we want to acknowledge the vision and contributions of Jack
Brilhart, who died in 2005. Jack wrote the first version of this text in the
late 1960s as one monograph in a communication series. For many years,
Jack shared his expertise, his passion for understanding and working with
small groups, and his vast experience working with a variety of groups. We
enjoyed working with him, appreciated his generosity and greatly miss him.
The following instructors were exceptionally helpful in supplying
thoughtful, carefully considered
suggestions: Alexia Kolokotrones,
Gil Cooper, Long Beach City College
Pittsburg State University Bala Musa,
Dennis Gouran, Azusa Pacific University
Pennsylvania State University
Donna Smith,
Douglas Guiffrida, Ferris State University
University of Rochester
Patrizia Hoffman, Barbara Tarter,
Lock Haven University of PA Marshall University
xv
T he three chapters in Part I provide introductory information to focus your study of
small group communication. Chapter 1 introduces important terms and concepts
used throughout the text. Chapter 2 lays the groundwork for understanding the com-
municative dynamics of small group interaction. Chapter 3 presents systems theory as a
framework for studying and understanding small groups.
T^S mall Cjro ups
in fCyeryones Life
2. Be familiar with some of the ways technology can help a group must understand how to be a
be more productive.
productive member of a group and
3. Use correctly the terms presented in this chapter, particularly
group, small group, small group discussion, and ethics. act accordingly, including knowing
4. Describe the difference between primary and secondary
how technology can benefit a
groups.
5. Consciously and intentionally become a participant-observer group’s work.
during group discussions.
6. Describe the six ethical principles most relevant to small group
communication.
4 Chapter 1
such a manner that each person influences and is influenced by each other
person.”22 Shaw argued that, of all the characteristics of groups, none were
more important than interaction and mutual influence.
The Artsfest Planning Committee simply collected in one place does not
necessarily constitute a group unless there is reciprocal awareness and influ-
ence among members. If, for example, LaShonda, Jerry, and Pam each write
separate letters to recruit an artist to apply, Shaw would argue that no group
exists yet because Jerry and Pam did not influence LaShonda in recruiting
particular artists. However, once the members begin to interact with each
other and talk about how to pool their efforts to recruit artists, then we see a
group emerging out of their interaction. Interaction assumes coordination of
behaviors.23 More fundamentally, interaction “requires mutual influence.” 24
The Artsfest committee members share a related key feature of a group:
Interdependent Goal an interdependent goal. Interdependence exists when all group members
An objective shared succeed or fail together in the accomplishment of the group’s purpose—in
by members of a this case, having a successful festival can be attained only if they coordinate
small group in such their efforts. In addition, committee members coordinated their actions, so
a way that one mem-
that artists, food vendors, volunteers, and so forth, all showed up at the
ber cannot achieve
right times on the right days. This logic extends to group members scattered
the goal without the
other members also geographically. If members interact and mutually influence each other by
achieving it. way of newsletters, telephone conversations, computer networks, or closed-
circuit TV, they still constitute a group.This occurred with the Artsfest com-
mittee. Although not geographically scattered, members influenced each
other via their e-mail, phone, text, Skype, and Dropbox correspondence.
The study of groups may include large groupings (e.g., whole societies)
or small ones; our focus is on small groups. The notion that “each person
influences and is influenced by each other” implies that members are aware
of each other, and from this mutual awareness we ground our definition of
Small Group small on perceptual awareness. A small group, therefore, is a group small
A group of at enough that each member is aware of and able to recall each other group
least three but few member, know who is and is not in the group, and recognize what role each
enough members is taking. Attempts to define small on the basis of number of members have
for each to perceive
never worked. At the low end, we can certainly perceive all members in a
all others as indi-
group of three. At the high end, most of us can take in up to 11 members in
viduals, share some
identity or common
a unit and, with training, may learn to handle 12 to 14.25
purpose, and share No doubt you have heard and used the word “team” and might wonder
standards for gov- whether there is difference between a small group and a team. Some schol-
erning their activities ars see teams as highly functioning groups with a strong group identity and
as members. shared leadership. Others reserve team for groups in which leadership is
shared, such as the case with self-managed work groups.27 In a compre-
hensive review of the research into team dynamics, Salas, Sims, and Burke
discovered a recurring theme in all the different definitions of team: the
recognition of interdependence between members as they strive toward
a group goal.28 Thus, we do not differentiate the two terms—group and
team—and use them interchangeably. A small group may be called a team
(e.g., top management team), yet function no better than other groups of
The Small Groups in Everyone's Life 9
its kind. Like Larson and LaFasto, we are interested in groups that function
well, no matter what they are called.29
Interaction, mutual influence, and interdependence are all central fea-
tures of a group. Coordinating behavior requires exchange of messages;
thus, the most central feature of human groups is their communication,
or interaction. Verbal and nonverbal exchange among group members is
where the work of the group gets accomplished. This exchange may be
face-to-face or may use computer or audioconferencing equipment. For
our purposes, small group discussion refers to a small group of people Small Group
Discussion
talking with each other in order to achieve some interdependent goal,
such as increased understanding, coordination of activity, or a solution to A small group of
a shared problem. We will now “unpack” this definition, revealing sev- people communi-
cating with each
eral characteristics of small group discussion:
other to achieve
1. A small enough number of people for each to be aware of and have some interdepen-
some reaction to each other (typically 3 to 7, rarely more than 15). dent goal, such as
2. A mutually interdependent purpose, making the success of one increased under-
member contingent on the success of all. standing, coordina-
3. Each person having a sense of belonging, of being part of the group. tion of activity, or
4. Interaction involving verbal and nonverbal behaviors, with words solution to a shared
problem.
conveying the content of the discussion. This definition includes as
“verbal” manual languages, such as American Sign Language and
typed computer-mediated messages. The emoticons used in e-mail
messages, such as :) to indicate smiling, count as nonverbal behav-
iors. Members continuously respond to and adapt their actions to
each other. The give-and-take of impromptu communication, rather
than prepared speeches, is the essence of small group discussion.
5. A sense of cooperation among members. Although there may be dis-
agreement and conflict, all members perceive themselves as searching for
a group outcome that will be as satisfactory as possible to all members.
6. Interaction occurring on a continuum from purely face-to-face to
purely computer mediated, or virtual. Traditional definitions of small
groups assumed that members meet face-to-face, but all the charac-
teristics mentioned here can occur in a virtual environment where
members never meet. Moreover, most group members, these days,
use some form of technology in conjunction with their face-to-face
group work. Therefore, instead of considering groups to be either
face-to-face or computer-mediated, it is more useful to consider
groups on a continuum depending on the extent to which they use
computer mediation. Such a continuum is anchored at one end by
face-to-face groups that never use computer mediation; followed by
groups that use e-mail or texting to touch base between meetings,
groups that meet and work virtually using Dropbox, Blackboard,
or similar document-sharing software; and anchored at the other
end by groups that meet entirely via computers. We will discuss this
continuum throughout the text.
10
Chapter 1
vasive in our lives that we may overlook their importance. Even though negative
experiences working in groups car turn many people away from group work, the fact
of the matter is that effective small group interaction has profound practical conse-
quences in our personal and professional lives.
1. People use groups to meet inclusion, control, and affection needs. Group partici-
pation allows people to make significant contributions to each other and society.
2. Being a group participant does not guarantee effective group behavior; group
members have to work to coordinate their actions toward a shared goal.
3. Groups are not merely collections of individuals, but they involve interaction, inter-
dependence, and mutual influence.
4. Small groups are not defined by the number of people in a group but by their lim-
its of perceptual awareness.
5. Small group discussion highlights the key role communication plays in defining a
collection of people as a small group with a sense of belonging, purpose, and
collaboration.
meet secondary needs for control and achievement. Such groups enable
members to exert power over their environment and others. For exam-
ple, the teams that worked to create Founders Park in downtown Spring-
field were secondary groups with a specific performance objective to be
attained, and members had to coordinate their efforts in order to achieve
that objective. While all groups formed to accomplish some task are more
secondary than primary, many task groups also help members achieve
primary needs for socialization and affection.
As you may have discerned by this point, there are no pure primary or
secondary groups. Although groups are classified as primary or secondary
according to their major function, primary groups also engage in work, and
secondary groups also provide affection and belonging to their members.
In fact, Anderson and Martin demonstrated that secondary group members
are motivated by a number of factors that are more primary than secondary,
including desires for pleasure and to escape. Such factors strongly influence
secondary group members’ communication behaviors, feelings of loneli-
ness, and satisfaction with the group and are worth examining.31
In addition to the two major classifications just described, there are
many other ways to categorize groups. The four categories described next
exhibit both primary and secondary characteristics in varying degrees, with
the fourth more purely secondary than the first three.
Activity Groups
Activity groups enable members to participate in an activity, both for the Activity Group
sake of doing the activity and for the affiliation provided by doing the activ- A group formed
ity with others. The following are examples: a book club whose members primarily for mem-
meet regularly to discuss a book, bridge and poker clubs, recreational bers to participate
in an activity such
vehicle clubs, hunting and bird-watching groups, video gaming clubs, and
as bridge, bowling,
numerous other interest groups. Members of such groups solve problems
hunting, and so
and make choices—when and where to meet, how to pay for their activities, forth.
how group membership is determined—but enjoyment of the activity and
fellowship with others whose interests are similar are the main purposes.
Educational Groups
Small groups occur in educational contexts for a variety of purposes. Com-
Learning Group mon learning groups, often called study groups, form so that members
A group discussing can understand a subject better by pooling their knowledge, perceptions,
for the purpose of and beliefs. These tend to be voluntary and coordinated by interested
learning about and students. Others, including cohorts, cooperative learning groups, and
understanding a
collaborative learning groups, are used by educators and often are not
subject more
voluntary.32 Cohorts, sometimes referred to as learning communities, are
completely.
used by universities to group selected students around a program of study.
Students often take a set of courses together. California State University,
Fresno, uses them extensively. Cooperative learning groups are composed
of students selected by teachers to work on a class assignment or topic.
The group’s output, often a report and presentation, is evaluated at the
group level. Such assignments characterize a major component of many
small group communication courses. Collaborative learning groups, simi-
lar to cooperative ones, are used to enhance individual achievement. For
example, students may be grouped to work on course papers where they
tutor each other in an effort to improve their individual writing skills. In
addition to learning about specific subject matter, members of such groups
also learn skills of effective speaking, listening, critical thinking, and effec-
Problem-Solving tive interpersonal communication.
Group
A group whose pur- Problem-Solving Groups
pose is finding ways
Problem-solving groups formed to address some condition or problem
to solve a problem
or address a particu-
vary widely in their composition and functioning. Examples we have
lar condition. already mentioned include the Artsfest Planning Committee and the various
Founders Park committees. There are many ways of describing subtypes of
problem-solving groups. In this book, we deal with major subtypes preva-
Committee lent in our modern organizational and social life: committees, quality con-
A small group of trol circles, self-managed work groups, and top management teams.
people given an
assigned task or Committees Committees are groups that have been assigned a task by a
responsibility by a
parent organization or person with authority in an organization. Commit-
larger group (parent
organization) or per-
tees may be formed to investigate and report findings, recommend a course
son with authority. of action for the parent group, formulate policies, or plan and carry out
some action.
Committees can be classified as either ad hoc or standing. An ad hoc
Ad Hoc Committee committee, established to perform a specific task, normally ceases to exist
A group that goes when that task has been completed. Ad hoc committees address all kinds of
out of existence problems, such as evaluating credentials of job applicants, drafting bylaws,
after its specific hearing grievances, planning social events, conducting investigations, devis-
task has been com- ing plans to solve work-related problems, advising legislators on what to do
pleted. about statewide problems, and evaluating programs and institutions. A task
force is a type of ad hoc committee with members appointed from various
The Small Groups in Everyone's Life 13
departments of an organization or political body and usually charged with
investigating a broad issue. For example, in 2007 the president of California
State
Universi
ty,
Fresno,
appointe
d a task
force of
faculty,
students,
staff,
and
commun
ity
member
s to
study
A committee discusses
how the the content of a report.
universit
y manages its athletic
finances and to make recommendations for improving the management of
those finances. Once the task force reported its action or recommendations,
it disbanded.
Standing committees are ongoing committees established through the Standing Committee
constitution or bylaws of an organization to deal with recurring types of A group given an
problems or to perform specific organizational functions. The most impor- area of responsibility
tant standing committee of most organizations is called the executive com- that includes many
tasks and continues
mittee, board, or steering committee. Usually, this group is charged with
indefinitely.
overall management of the organization and can function for the entire
organization when general membership meetings are not feasible. Other
common standing committees have names such as membership committee,
personnel committee, parking and traffic committee, program committee, Quality Control Circle
bylaws committee, and so forth. These groups continue indefinitely, even A group of employ-
though the membership changes. ees who meet on
company time to
Quality Control Circles investigate work-
related problems
A quality control circle consists of workers (usually five to seven) in a and to make recom-
company who either volunteer or are selected to meet regularly on com- mendations for solv-
pany time to discuss work-related problems. Sometimes called continu- ing these problems
ous improvement teams, cycle time reduction groups, or just plain quality (also called a quality
circles, their purpose is to improve some aspect of work life—efficiency, circle).
quality of finished products, worker safety, and so forth.
14
Chapter 1
by purpose.
1. Primary groups, like family and friends, help us meet our needs for belonging
and affection.
2. Secondary groups, those commonly referred to as task groups, help us meet our
needs for control and achievement.
3. Subtypes of primary and secondary groups often mix the purposes of both. These
include activity, personal growth, educational, and problem-solving groups such
as committees, quality control circles, self-managed work groups, and top man-
agement teams.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.