Professional Documents
Culture Documents
The Neuropsychology
Fact-Finding Casebook
ii
iii
The Neuropsychology
Fact-Finding Casebook
A Training Resource
1
iv
1
Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. It furthers
the University’s objective of excellence in research, scholarship, and education
by publishing worldwide. Oxford is a registered trade mark of Oxford University
Press in the UK and certain other countries.
9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Printed by WebCom, Inc., Canada
v
In memory of Thomas A. Martin, PsyD, an accomplished colleague, wonderful person, and true friend.
Although he left us too soon, there remains a bright spot in our lives where his smile still shines.
vi
vii
Table of Contents
1 Introduction 1
Case 2 Mrs. Napoleon (66 y/o F), primary care physician referral 53
Case 3 Mr. Caesar (34 y/o M), primary care physician referral 62
Case 7 Dr. William (33 y/o M), residency program referral 106
Case 8 Mrs. Lincoln (69 y/o F), inpatient internal medicine referral 117
Case 11 Mr. King (31 y/o M), social work referral 150
Case 12 Mrs. Mandela (76 y/o F), primary care physician referral 160
vii
viii
Case 14 Mr. Franklin (68 y/o M), primary care physician referral 181
Case 18 Mrs. Teresa (51 y/o F), primary care physician referral 223
Case 20 Ms. Madison (48 y/o F), fitness for duty evaluation referral 242
Case 21 Dr. Phule (55 y/o F), insurance company—independent exam referral 253
Case 22 Mr. Adams (53 y/o M), primary care physician referral 264
Case 23 Mr. Garcia Marquez (58 y/o M), psychiatrist referral 274
Case 24 Mr. Leif (55 y/o M), primary care physician referral 284
viii
ix
This book was conceived during a neuropsychology conference in 2013 while the two authors and
Dr. Thomas Martin shared a drink and discussed how best to teach trainees in clinical neuropsychol-
ogy and rehabilitation psychology. We were aware then that the profession of clinical neuropsychology
had embraced the fact-finding exercise as a valuable training tool and method for examining practitio-
ner competence. We also knew through experience as supervisors that the judicious use of fact-finding
exercises could supplement and even enrich didactics and in vivo cases used during the trainee’s tenure.
At the conclusion of that discussion we agreed that teaching a structured approach to case analysis was
central to promoting good clinical decision making, and that a casebook with exercises based on such
an approach could help prepare trainees for independent practice and board certification. Thus, our
primary goal in writing this book is to share an approach that we have found helpful in training set-
tings and to illustrate the fact-finding model through compelling and challenging clinical cases. At the
same time, given the diverse nature of the cases presented, we hope that readers will gain some vicarious
clinical knowledge, particularly from the types of cases with which they may have relatively little or less
experience.
The process of writing this book was a learning experience and forced us to discuss a number of
issues pertinent to current clinical neuropsychology practice and helping trainees master various com-
petencies. We are grateful to colleagues who reviewed components of the book in various draft forms
and reinforced for us those aspects of the profession that are relatively well established as well as those
aspects about which considerable disagreement still exists. Considering the variability in current neuro-
psychology practice, we have no doubt that some readers will disagree with certain methods, terminol-
ogy, diagnostic determinations, and even recommendations across specific cases. However, we believe
that this casebook provides a defensible model for evidence-based practice and hope that in some small
way it may help to further discussion about aspects of the profession for which uniformity is lacking
but for which uniformity may be of value. The criteria and the terms used to describe low test scores is
one example that immediately comes to mind. Another issue that became apparent in writing this book
is the fact that certain core battery measures are employed in nearly every case, but no two cases have
an identical set of test measures. This is not necessarily surprising considering that the flexible battery
approach is quite popular among practicing neuropsychologists. However, in our various discussions
with colleagues and between one another, we learned that significant opportunities remain with regard
to the development of more sophisticated assessment and training standards or guidelines. For these
reasons and others, we believe that supervision should always include the discussion of different opin-
ions, options, and practices that exist throughout clinical neuropsychology, with an explanation as to
why one manner of practicing is chosen over another in that particular setting or situation.
The writing of this book required the support of a number of individuals to whom we are very grate-
ful. We are indebted to Drs. Jacobus Donders, John Lucas, and Scott Millis who were kind enough to
review parts of the book and provide extremely helpful feedback and sage advice, which immensely
ix
x
improved the quality of the content. Sandra Pastori, Vicki Thomas, and Simon Lilley also provided
assistance in double checking data and test scores for a number of cases in this volume. We would also
like to thank Joan Bossert and all at Oxford University Press who provided support and assistance from
the initial conceptualization of the project through publication. It was a pleasure to work with all of
these colleagues throughout the process, and we appreciate the support and encouragement provided.
We are also grateful to all of the trainees and board certification candidates with whom we have worked.
Each of them, in one form or another, have provided feedback that encouraged the evolution of the fact-
finding model presented in this book. Finally, we owe a great debt to the patients and their families who
entrusted aspects of their care to us. Without them, this book and our own professional development
would not have been possible. We hope that their stories, told through the cases within this volume,
will help teach, inform, and prepare future neuropsychologists committed to the delivery of quality
patient care.
x
1
1 Introduction
Formal training in clinical neuropsychology introduces trainees to diverse patient populations with
a variety of diagnostic conditions and disorders. Learning to competently apply a structured, fact-
finding approach to case conceptualization, differential diagnosis, and treatment planning is an
essential goal at all levels of the training experience. However, to date, there has been little in the way
of a standardized approach to fact-fi nding that training programs at various levels can use to help
trainees develop such skills, leaving supervisors in various programs to teach their own versions of
the methodology. We believe that neuropsychological training and ultimately the patients served
will benefit from a more uniform approach to using clinical fact-fi nding exercises as a teaching tool.
This book was designed to be a resource for supervisors, trainees, and training programs in clin-
ical neuropsychology. The volume provides 24 adult/geriatric fact-finding cases (one for each month
of a 2-year residency) based upon real patients evaluated by the authors in various settings. Aspects
of the history, demographic information, and other unique identifiers have been intentionally modi-
fied to safeguard patient confidentiality and maximize learning opportunities. An attempt has been
made to present the cases in a stepwise fashion, with progressive increases in complexity, to address the
training needs of clinicians at various levels of professional development (i.e., student/intern, resident,
independent practitioner). However, given differences in clinical experiences, some trainees and profes-
sionals may find some of the earlier cases to be more challenging or complex than later cases. Similar to
common neuropsychological practice in the United States, a flexible battery approach was utilized with
common core battery measures administered in most cases but tailored to the specific needs of a given
patient (Rabin, Barr, & Burton, 2005; Sweet, Moberg, & Suchy, 2000). A case summary, list of diagnostic
possibilities, and expected recommendations are also provided.
Following this information we offer focused questions that supervisors can ask or trainees can ask
themselves to further facilitate the learning experience. These questions are organized by the compe-
tency areas of (a) evidence-based knowledge, (b) assessment, (c) intervention, and (d) consultation. In
each competency area there are questions designed for trainees at different developmental stages (i.e.,
student/intern, resident, and ready for independent practice), but supervisors can modify the questions
or create new ones based upon their specific goals. Following these questions, each case has a brief
“Outcome” section that describes the final diagnosis and outcome after the evaluation was completed.
Finally, a more specific discussion of various aspects of the case is provided to highlight critical teach-
ing points and stimulate discussion. It is important to emphasize, however, that the primary purpose
of each case is to help trainees learn critical thinking skills through a fact-finding process rather than
provide extensive coverage or teaching regarding various disorders and/or conditions. We also antici-
pate that, following completion of the fact-finding exercise, the supervisor and trainee will most likely
identify specific areas which require further attention and identify specific ways to address them (i.e.,
didactics, readings).
We primarily selected cases that required relatively comprehensive evaluations conducted in an out-
patient setting. However, there are several cases that highlight differential diagnosis in hospitalized
patients with significant and obvious neurocognitive compromise. In these cases, brief screens are more
1
2
appropriate and preferred. We believe their inclusion in this casebook was appropriate as neuropsychol-
Fact-Finding Casebook
ogists are often actively, and even primarily, involved in inpatient practice. It is important to emphasize
that the cases in this book do not contain a score-by-score analysis or exhaustive explanation and dis-
cussion of every diagnostic or treatment possibility. Instead, critical teaching points deemed central to
case formulation were intentionally selected for more detailed discussion. Considering that a full data set
from these cases is presented, we anticipate that supervisors using this volume might identify or choose
to stress different case aspects that we did not emphasize.
This book is intended to appeal to a variety of consumers in neuropsychology, including graduate
school instructors, supervisors, trainees, and training directors. Other neuropsychology professionals
may also find value in the book. Additionally, candidates preparing for the board certification oral exam-
ination in clinical neuropsychology could potentially use this book in their preparation. However, it is
important to emphasize that because the cases are primarily designed to assist supervisors in training
settings, the format for these fact-finding cases differs somewhat from the formats used for oral exami-
nations conducted by the American Board of Professional Psychology (ABPP) clinical neuropsychology
(ABCN) specialty board. The following section contains a brief user’s guide for The Neuropsychology
Fact-Finding Casebook: A Training Resource.
2
3
Introduction
training sites, supervisors will likely choose to highlight certain case aspects or modify the delivery of
information as needed for training purposes. Obviously, the supervisor is in the best position to make
such decisions. In our experience, detailed medical information is not commonly available at the time
of an individual patient’s first outpatient appointment or intake evaluation. Thus, for training purposes
it is reasonable to present fact-finding cases in a manner that mimics real world practice. For example,
a supervisor may initially elect to withhold neuroimaging and pertinent medical information at the
beginning of the exercise to ensure that trainees demonstrate adequate information gathering, clinical
decision making, and differential diagnostic skills through their use of interviewing and specific neuro-
psychological assessment tools. For those residents near the end of training the supervisor may modify
the approach to more closely mimic an oral exam experience. Other supervisors might elect to only use
certain cases. In each case we have provided suggestions regarding the information to be disclosed or
withheld during the fact-finding exercise. However, supervisors and training programs are encouraged
to tailor these cases in a manner that considers the trainees’ unique needs and developmental level.
To increase flexibility in the fact-finding process, case information and assessment data are divided
into sections. This separation allows supervisors to choose when or if to provide information based
upon the trainee’s queries regarding the history and assessment results. Additionally, each fact-finding
case has an online link which provides the specific case information and data sheet in PowerPoint
slides. The neuropsychological data for each cognitive domain is available on separate pages and in
large font, containing the pertinent scores. Whether used in an individual or group setting, the online
resources connected to this book allow the supervisor to download the information so that it can
be easily projected on a screen. The specific information and test data for each case can be found at
www.oup.com/us/stucky. This resource also makes it easier to electronically reveal case information
sequentially as requested by the trainee. The online link does not contain the case formulation summary,
questions for discussion, outcome, or teaching points that are provided in the book. This is intended to
prevent Internet-savvy or overly industrious trainees from looking up cases in advance and potentially
spoiling the fact-finding experience.
3
4
ABCN Certified Without Sacrificing Your Sanity (Armstrong, Beebe, Hilsabeck, & Kirkwood, 2008). This
Fact-Finding Casebook
resource provides detailed information regarding the board certification process and a chapter dedi-
cated to the oral examination. The authors also provide a variety of suggestions for preparing for the
fact-finding component. Additionally, the website http://w ww.theabcn.org/ describes the procedures
required for obtaining the ABCN diploma.
Conclusions
Ethical neuropsychological practice requires competence in the clinical services provided. Consistent
with ethical practice, strong assessment and critical thinking skills must be developed and maintained
over time. Use of a structured fact-finding approach that is based on sound clinical judgment and applied
flexibly facilitates clinical decision making and patient care. By practicing the fact-finding model offered
in this book under the guidance of experienced supervisors, advanced trainees by the end of their resi-
dencies are likely to be well prepared to generate adequate case conceptualizations, diagnostic determi-
nations, and helpful recommendations for patients with a wide range of presenting problems, thereby
promoting high-quality treatment and patient well being.
References
Armstrong, K. W., Beebe, D. W., Hilsabeck, R. C., & Kirkwood, M. W. (2008). Board certification in clinical neu-
ropsychology: A guide to becoming ABPP/ABCN certified without sacrificing your sanity. New York: Oxford
University Press.
Rabin, L. A., Barr, W. B., & Burton, L. A. (2005). Assessment practices of clinical neuropsychologists in the United
States and Canada: A survey of INS, NAN, and APA Division 40 members. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology,
20, 33–65.
Sweet, J. J., Moberg, P. J., & Suchy, Y. (2000). Ten-year follow-up survey of clinical neuropsychologists: Part I.
Practices and beliefs. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 14, 18–37.
4
5
5
6
A Sample Template
In a typical fact-finding exercise, trainees are given a brief vignette and then asked to describe and
explain what they want to glean from the interview and testing portions of the evaluation. When using
the fact-finding exercise with early career trainees, it is advisable to follow the general structure but not
to adhere to strict timelines as trainees may require additional time or modeling from the supervisor to
learn certain information gathering skills. Additionally, in group settings the supervisor may encourage
two or more trainees to participate in the exercise while others observe. In our experience these modi-
fications typically result in the need for more time (i.e., 90–120 minutes) and the supervisor often has to
be flexible especially if using the exercise to teach skills to trainees at different developmental levels. It
should be emphasized, however, that during the course of a 2-year residency the goal is for the trainee
to become progressively more comfortable and efficient with the fact-finding exercise, considering that
during the ABCN oral examination candidates will have approximately 50 minutes to obtain all of the
information necessary to reach a differential diagnosis and treatment plan. Under these circumstances it
is critical to ask questions efficiently and avoid exploration of minute or superfluous details. Armstrong
et al. (2008) and Schmidt (2008) recommended time allotment guidelines to help stay within allowed
time parameters. We have modified those guidelines in a manner that is consistent with the model pre-
sented in this book (see Table 2.2).
Fact-finding exercises commonly raise anxiety in trainees and board certification candidates. Given
the effect that anxiety can have on performance and thinking efficiency, it can be helpful to have a tem-
plate or mnemonic device memorized to help cue one through a systematic process of inquiry. Such
strategies help ensure that important components of the history and data gathering processes are not
missed or forgotten. Without a structured approach, it is easy to become distracted by details and con-
sequently fail to gather critical information efficiently.
6
7
Although trainees are not allowed to bring materials into the fact-finding exercise, they should be
given blank paper and encouraged to jot down notes throughout the process. When given the paper, a
valuable first step is to write down a mnemonic device or outline that will be used to guide the inquiry
Training Template
process. Once the fact-finding exercise begins and the trainee has made notes, it should be easier for
them to change the order of inquiry if needed for that particular exercise while remaining attentive to all
pertinent aspects of the initial interview and inquiry process.
Similar to the clinical interview, history taking and information gathering during a fact-finding exer-
cise is a dynamic process and indispensable tool for generating plausible hypotheses. When conducted
properly, the initial interview reveals information that allows clinicians to narrow down a number of
possible or probable etiologies. Neuropsychological data and test results can be fairly uninformative
and potentially misleading if not coupled with such background information (Vanderploeg, 2000).
For example, low average memory scores in a patient with a third-grade education are not uncommon,
whereas the same scores might represent a significant decline in a college professor with a history of
outstanding performance. During the history-gathering portion of the fact-finding process, it is gen-
erally wise to start with open-ended questions and move toward more specific questions once a gen-
eral idea of the major presenting issues has been established (Donders, 2005). Also, systematically and
briefly discussing each section in the template can act as a safeguard against confirmatory bias, which
occurs when focusing too narrowly on specific issues. If the initial inquiry is conducted thoroughly,
then trainees should not need to ask intake-t ype questions during the second half of the exercise. For
advanced trainees or those preparing for the ABCN oral examination, completing the initial inter-
view portion of the fact-finding in 10–15 minutes or less is advisable. The remaining time can then be
spent requesting specific test results and asking additional clarifying questions with regard to behav-
ioral observations and contradictory or confusing findings. Essentially, a thorough but efficient clinical
interview demonstrates the trainee’s level of acumen and establishes the information necessary to plan
a focused assessment battery.
For early career trainees, one of the supervisor’s primary goals is to teach, model, and promote
a logical and systematic progression through a case. In later stages of training the fact-finding
exercise typically becomes more time-l imited and intense in an effort to assess, hone, and/or fine-
tune acquired skills and knowledge. Regardless of the primary goal, it can be very helpful to use a
template that organizes the history-t aking process. In this chapter we provide and describe a sample
template. However, if this system does not fit well with a clinician’s preferred approach, they are
encouraged to create a more personalized system. Additionally, alternative and sample history-
taking templates are available on the BRAIN (Be Ready for ABPP in Neuropsychology) website
(BRAIN.aacnwiki.org). It is advisable to use a familiar approach that reflects the clinician’s typical
day-to-d ay practice and to take notes on the information provided. An outline of our template is
provided in Table 2.3. A brief description of each section is provided afterwards along with sample
queries to obtain information.
Identifying Information and Reason(s) for Referral. General identifying information should be
obtained at the beginning of any assessment including, but not limited to, age, marital status, handedness,
primary language, and race/ethnicity. After obtaining the patient’s basic demographic information,
understanding the reason for referral and the specific questions that are being asked by the referring
party helps focus the assessment plan and interview. This clarification includes establishing who the
client is (e.g., patient or referral source) and the limits to confidentiality that exist. For example, whether
the patient has a legal guardian or the examination was requested by a third party (e.g., independent
7
8
evaluation) can have important implications for confidentiality, discussion of results, and other important
aspects of the evaluation (see Box 2.1).
BOX 2.1
“Who referred this patient to me, and what are they hoping to gain from the assessment?”
“Has the patient been sent for other tests or to other clinicians, in addition to my assessment?”
Assessment Goals. Determining the purpose and goals for the assessment is essential for meeting the
needs of patients, their family members, and other referral sources. Having all parties clearly understand
the goals for the assessment also increases the likelihood that essential information will be obtained without
taxing the patient with unneeded procedures. Such goals may include, among others, differential diagnosis,
determination of functional abilities, clarifying decision-making capacity, and establishing a baseline
against which future improvement or decline can be measured. In some cases, the goals of the patient and
family members are different than the referral source. These alternative goals can (and perhaps should) be
obtained early in the assessment process along with the referral source questions; however, in other cases it
is more advantageous to ask about the patient’s specific goals once a more thorough understanding of the
patient’s background, medical history, and presenting problem has been established (see Box 2.2).
BOX 2.2
“What is the patient hoping to get out of this assessment? What are his expectations?”
“I am especially interested in knowing if she has a clear sense of why she is here because there is some informa-
tion provided that suggests problems with self-awareness.”
Presenting Problem(s). The patient’s presenting complaints and understanding of the reason for
referral can offer insight regarding the patient’s level of awareness, degree of distress, and overall impact
of symptoms on function. For example, some patients with severe neurologic problems are unaware of
8
9
their cognitive deficits and may minimize problems or be confused about why they have been referred.
Conversely, other patients may present with a high degree of emotional distress regarding real or
perceived cognitive impairments, which can lead to important insights for treatment planning and the
Training Template
need for psychological or behavioral interventions. Example queries are provided in Box 2.3.
BOX 2.3
“I am interested in knowing the patient’s primary complaints and why he has sought evaluation or treatment
at this time.”
“What are the patient’s top one, two, or three concerns at the time of this assessment?”
Our template breaks the presenting problem section into cognitive, psychological, and physical com-
plaints, with a final section on the onset and course of symptoms. Although we recognize that patients
commonly report symptom clusters that overlap with each of these areas, we wanted to explicitly rein-
force the need to explore each of these areas. It is beyond the scope of this chapter to discuss all possible
lines of inquiry but the depth of the clinician’s knowledge base often informs a more focused and sophis-
ticated inquiry process.
Mood assessment is obviously critical in any neuropsychological assessment. Additionally, the quality
of a patient’s appetite, sleep, intimacy, and sexual function, or the presence of pain can inform diagnosis
and treatment planning. Although problems with such aspects of life are not specific to any particular
disorder, they can shed light on the nature and severity of a patient’s cognitive and emotional problems.
For example, neurovegetative symptoms are often present in patients with medical and psychiatric con-
ditions, and certain sleep disturbances are more associated with specific neurologic conditions (e.g.,
REM sleep behavior disorder in Lewy Body dementia; Gagnon et al., 2006). Appetite disturbances can
occur for a variety of reasons, but the loss of smell or appetite following an acute injury might give clues
as to the nature and extent of injury.
Sexual function is often passed over in neuropsychological assessment, typically because clinicians are
uncomfortable raising the topic, but questions about aspects of intimacy can reveal otherwise unrecog-
nized problems. Additionally, changes in sexual function can sometimes provide information regarding
the nature of underlying problems. For example, increased libido and the development of unusual sexual
interests might coincide with personality changes in an individual with frontotemporal dementia or a
brain tumor in the orbitofrontal region. Finally, for patients with medical conditions, it is always advis-
able to inquire about pain and, when present, its impact on emotional health and function (see Box 2.4).
BOX 2.4
“Patients with this type of medical condition often have problems with pain. Are there any complaints or issues
regarding pain in this case?”
“I would like to know how the patient is sleeping and eating. She appears to have a number of symptoms sug-
gestive of depression, and I would like to know if there are neurovegetative symptoms.”
“The history thus far makes me concerned about the possibility of an early-onset dementia. Patients with this
type of condition often display changes in sleep patterns. I would like to know the patient’s and family mem-
bers’ perceptions with regard to current sleep patterns and whether there have been any recent changes.”
Asking about the onset, duration, progression, and degree of concern regarding presenting com-
plaints is also important. This process should include inquiry regarding cognitive, physical, and psycho-
logical complaints, as many neurologic and psychiatric conditions can impact all three. In some cases
9
10
identifiable diagnostic patterns and hypotheses can be generated via history alone. Referrals are often
Fact-Finding Casebook
made because there has been a concerning event or some type of change or shift that has exacerbated or
unveiled longstanding symptoms. Sample questions are provided in Box 2.5.
BOX 2.5
“How has the patient’s life changed as a result of these problems? What can’t he do now that he used to be
able to do?”
“Have these problems been getting worse, better, or just staying the same over time?”
“Has she had similar problems in the past?”
“These problems have reportedly been present for more than a year. Have they been getting progressively
worse or remained stable over time? Why is the patient seeking services now?”
Functional Status. The functional impact of symptoms is often the primary concern of patients, family
members, and referral sources. However, after learning the presenting complaints, the functional
consequences may or may not be apparent. Therefore, inquiry regarding the patient’s ability to perform
basic/personal and instrumental activities of daily living is critical (hereafter referred to as ADLs and
IADLs). Specific questions should also be asked regarding how the current symptoms or complaints
impact the patient’s capacity to function day to day, meet expectations, or fulfill crucial life roles. Aspects
of functioning that may be particularly informative include self-care activities, work performance, the
ability to cook safely, the ability to drive safely and without getting lost, and the ability to go for walks
in the neighborhood or visit nearby friends or relatives without getting lost or failing to recognize safety
hazards (see Box 2.6).
BOX 2.6
“How have the patient’s problems affected her ability to perform activities of daily living?”
“Is the patient able to drive and manage her own money? Are there other higher-level (instrumental) activities
of daily living that are compromised?”
Past Medical and Psychiatric History. Medical and psychiatric histories are often treated separately,
but obtaining this information contiguously is advisable because there can be overlap between medical
and psychiatric conditions. For example, patients with bipolar disorder and schizophrenia have a higher
rate of neurologic conditions (e.g., history of brain injury, seizures) relative to those without serious
mental illness (Malaspina et al., 2001). Additionally, patients may have preexisting medical conditions
or prior injuries that must be taken into account prior to planning an assessment battery (e.g. blindness,
upper extremity injuries, amputation).
Whenever possible, medical records should be obtained to confirm or clarify patient self-report, which
can be inaccurate or misleading with regard to injury severity or medical conditions past and present.
However, detailed medical records may not be offered at the beginning of a fact-finding case because the
exercise is intended to determine if trainees can use their neuropsychological expertise to determine the
appropriate assessment plan or possible diagnosis. Given the importance of demonstrating one’s rea-
soning process, it is not advisable during fact-finding exercises to immediately ask for MRI or CT scan
results or the diagnosis provided by the physician. However, there is certainly nothing wrong with the
trainee stating something like, “The patient’s complaints (or pattern of performance) give me concern
10
11
that she may have sustained a stroke or acute neurologic event affecting language systems. When or if it
becomes available, I would be interested in any neuroradiologic studies.” This statement helps display the
trainee’s level of sophistication while hopefully reassuring the examiner that the trainee is not primar-
Training Template
ily going to rely on radiologic or other medical studies to make a diagnostic determination. Additional
sample questions are provided in Box 2.7.
BOX 2.7
“Have there been any recent medical events or hospitalizations?”
“Does the patient have a history of treatment for any chronic medical conditions, or is there a history of injury
or hospitalization in the past?”
“How well does the patient believe her medical concerns are being addressed? What is the quality of her rela-
tionship and satisfaction with current treatment providers?”
“Do I have access to any formal medical records at this time? I am especially interested in information regarding
her reported hospitalization following a motor vehicle collision. This would help me determine injury severity
and the accuracy of her self-report.”
Medications. Knowing the patient’s medication and medication history provides insight into the
conditions that are being treated and the impact of treatment. Some medications, such as stimulants, can
have positive effects on cognitive functioning and/or behavior, which may help patients achieve maximum,
but not typical, performance on tests. Conversely, certain medications can result in adverse cognitive
or psychological effects. For example, antihypertensive drugs and pain medications can contribute to
fatigue or concentration complaints, whereas some antidepressants have anticholinergic effects which
can negatively impact memory, especially in older adults. Awareness of the signs and symptoms of other
medication-induced conditions, such as serotonin syndrome and neuroleptic malignant syndrome, can
also facilitate accurate diagnosis and appropriate treatment planning, especially when providing hospital
consultation services (see Box 2.8).
BOX 2.8
“What medication is the patient currently taking, and can he tell me what it is for? This information should
help me determine how insightful he is with regard to his current medical conditions and treatment, as well as
determine the possible or potential neuropsychological effects of medications.”
“Does the patient have any specific concerns about the medication she is taking? Is she reporting any recent
medication changes or side effects? I am curious because [name a specific medication being taken] can some-
times cause problems with memory and concentration.”
“The patient is on a number of pain medications. Are the dosages excessive? Have there been any concerns
regarding overuse or physical dependence/addiction? I would want to know this because many pain medica-
tions can negatively affect cognition.”
Substance Use History. Use and abuse of alcohol, illicit substances, and prescription drugs can have
an impact on mood, behavior, and cognition acutely and over time. Additionally, chronic tobacco use
can put one at higher risk for various vascular disorders and cancer. Questions about prior and current
substance use should be part of the clinical interview (see Box 2.9).
11
12
Fact-Finding Casebook
BOX 2.9
“Does the patient disclose any history of alcohol or illicit substance use/abuse?”
“The patient reported a long history of medical marijuana use. Have there been any concerns regarding over-
use or physical dependence/addiction? I would want to know this because marijuana can negatively affect
cognition.”
Family Medical and Psychiatric History. Family medical and psychiatric history is critical in the
assessment of conditions in which genetic or psychosocial factors may be contributory. For example,
a history of neurodegenerative or psychiatric problems in the family may increase the patient’s risk for
similar problems. Sample questions are provided in Box 2.10.
BOX 2.10
“Is there anyone in the patient’s family with similar problems?”
“Are the patient’s parents still alive and, if so, do they have any medical conditions of interest? I am especially
interested as to whether there is a family history of dementia, considering the spouse’s observations of pro-
gressive functional decline.”
Academic History. The patient’s level of academic achievement and quality of education impacts test-
score expectations and subsequent interpretation. The presence of premorbid academic difficulties can
alert clinicians to specific cautions regarding interpretation or the relative influence of acute versus
chronic/longstanding problems. This section of the interview should also include inquiry regarding the
patient’s native language. Variables such as English-language proficiency, age, ethnicity, and gender can
also have an impact on test performance and test-score interpretation. For example, older individuals
or those from impoverished backgrounds may have had an education of lesser quality than younger,
middle-class adults. Sample questions are provided in Box 2.11.
BOX 2.11
“What is this person’s educational background? That information will help me determine basic expectations
with regard to level of performance during the assessment.”
“Is there any prior history of learning disability or academic struggles? I want to know this because the patient
complains of trouble reading and spelling.”
Occupational History. Work type and stability can be helpful in estimating premorbid function. Also,
some individuals with relatively low educational attainment go on to successful careers which may
imply higher intelligence or cognitive reserve than what might be suggested by traditional “hold tests”
or tasks tapping so called crystallized intelligence. Understanding the nature of an individual’s work is
also critical in determining the probability of return to work or planning for specific accommodations if
return to work is considered. For cases with a strong rehabilitation emphasis, the employer’s willingness
to accommodate the patient versus following strict or inflexible return-to-work guidelines is also
important to know. Finally, some work environments expose individuals to excessive stress, high physical
demands, heavy metals, or other toxins that may need to be considered in the differential diagnosis.
Sample questions are provided in Box 2.12.
12
13
BOX 2.12
“What does or did this person do for a living? Is he currently working? How have his current complaints
Training Template
impacted his ability to work? Are there any accommodations in place?”
“How stable is the patient’s work history? I would like to know because this will be important in determining
reasonable vocational goals for the future.”
Social History. The stability of relationships (e.g., marriage, children, siblings, parents) can be a marker
for emotional health, adjustment, and the level of psychosocial support available to the patient. Clinical
interventions, level of supervision, and placement decisions are often heavily influenced by the level of
psychosocial support available. Thus, social support can modify the functional and emotional impact of
most neurologic conditions, regardless of severity. Furthermore, preexisting marital and family stresses
may place the patient at higher risk for serious adjustment reactions, isolation, or other complications
independent of the medical condition. The sample questions in Box 2.13 help to clarify relationship history.
BOX 2.13
“Who does the patient trust and rely on most? I want to know this because the level of social support could
have a significant impact on the implementation of my recommendations.”
“I know that good social support following stroke can be protective with regard to the risk for depression or
serious adjustment issues. What is the family or collateral support like for this patient?”
Legal Issues/History. Secondary gain potential and litigation status can affect symptom reporting
and performance during neuropsychological evaluations. Persons who are involved in civil or criminal
cases, are pursuing disability benefits, or are seeking academic or workplace accommodations, whether
evaluated for clinical or forensic purposes, may intentionally skew their responses or performance in an
attempt to benefit their case. Additionally, the significant stress and emotional distress that commonly
accompany litigation can unintentionally affect performance on neuropsychological tests. For these
reasons, compared to some routine clinical evaluations, neuropsychologists evaluating persons in
contexts with potential secondary gain often place greater emphasis on symptom and performance
validity issues and consider the possible impact of legal and administrative issues when interpreting
neuropsychological data and offering diagnoses. Questions about prior and current legal issues should
be part of the clinical interview (see Box 2.14).
BOX 2.14
“Is the examinee involved in litigation, does she have a significant legal history, or is she pursuing disability
benefits or special accommodations? I am interested in learning whether secondary gain or the stress of legal
involvement could be impacting symptom reporting or test performance.”
“Considering the wife’s report of longstanding impulsive and irrational behavior, does the patient have a his-
tory of prior legal entanglements or issues with the law?”
Collateral Report. Interview of collateral sources of information, such as family members or other
caregivers, can help clarify the nature and progression of symptoms or the timeline regarding the
development of the condition. Because some geriatric patients, young children, and persons with
neurological or psychiatric disorders can be poor historians, reliance on information provided by
13
14
collateral sources can be particularly helpful in such cases. Dramatically different perceptions between
Fact-Finding Casebook
collateral sources and patients are often a red flag for significant neurologic compromise, psychological
denial, anosagnosia, or intentional misrepresentation of one’s abilities.
Significantly different perspectives might also reveal interpersonal conflicts that are contributing to a
patient’s problems with emotional adjustment and adaptation. Additionally, discrepancies in the infor-
mation provided by a patient and a collateral source may reflect a personal agenda on the part of the
collateral source that is not consistent with the best interests of the patient and reflects misinformation
(e.g., attempting to manipulate an older adult patient’s will). Despite this possibility, spending consider-
able time during a fact-finding exercise trying to determine the motivations of a hypothetical collateral
source is often a poor use of time (see Box 2.15).
BOX 2.15
“I would like to know what family members and caregivers have observed or understand about the patient’s
problems, if possible. I am specifically curious as to whether their report will be similar to or significantly dif-
ferent than the patient’s report.”
Behavioral Observations. The patient’s general appearance, interaction style, affect, ability to stay
on topic, language functions, sensory and motor functions (e.g., use of assistive devices), presence of
psychotic symptoms, cooperation, and other aspects of presentation are important to determine because
they can potentially provide diagnostic information and impact test performance. Specific problems
in these areas can have diagnostic implications when combined with background information and
objective data. In this casebook we have intentionally condensed the behavioral observations section
to only include the most notable observations. This was done because reporting unremarkable details
can overwhelm some trainees and also waste valuable time, especially when the fact-finding exercise
is being conducted under strict time constraints. Trainees should be reminded that it is helpful to be
able to quickly review out loud a list of important behavioral observations. Some trainees benefit from
memorizing a separate mnemonic device to cue this process of inquiry (see Box 2.16).
BOX 2.16
“Behavioral observations are going to be very important in this case. I am especially interested in mood and
affect because the patient’s family reported recent emotional changes.”
“The interview suggests significant problems with aspects of executive function. During the clinical inter-
view or testing, is the patient inappropriate or does he behave oddly? Are there social-skills deficits or odd
mannerisms?”
“There appear to be a lot of language-based complaints. I want to differentiate this from the memory com-
plaints. In conversation are there word-finding problems or obvious paraphasias, or is there evidence of
circumlocution?”
14
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.