Professional Documents
Culture Documents
It seems as if the world has changed drastically since the first publication of
this book. America seemingly moved into a “post-racial” society in which
race and ethnicity mean less, highlighted by the election of Barack Obama as
the first African American/biracial president. And yet much has not changed
in terms of race relations. Media coverage of racial issues has included
African American men and boys being shot by police officers and debates
about the Confederate flag. Immigration issues were highlighted with the
coverage of tens of thousands of youth traveling from South America to
escape persecution, violence, and exploitation. Immigration reform has
continued to be discussed as a major political platform during election
seasons. The Supreme Court has ruled to legalize gay marriage, and the
transformation of Bruce to Caitlin has brought new attention to transgendered
individuals. This book may seem to be more relevant now as clinicians need
to understand the role of culture on identity and psychological functioning.
This book is about the theoretical frameworks we need to work with diverse
clients and about people’s life journeys, the stories they tell about themselves,
and a few of the possible clinical applications derived from them. The stories
provide us with a glimpse into the subjects’ pasts and an opportunity to
imagine their futures.
Close friends and relatives tell me that I am insatiably curious about people’s
lives, but what I am most interested in are people’s cultural lives.
We have been confronted with four difficulties in the course that we are sure
other instructors, students, and clinicians experience too. First, many
textbooks that cover multicultural theory focus solely on the racial and ethnic
aspects of clinical work with minorities and exclude other cultural factors.
This approach helps to build understanding of values, beliefs, lifestyle, and
perspectives for each group, but it is fairly limited in promoting an
understanding of intragroup differences and may promote stereotyping of
groups. The second difficulty is helping students understand the full influence
of culture on individuals’ functioning and identity. Most instructors
incorporate the use of popular movies, case vignettes, and media resources to
help portray the concepts covered. Though case vignettes and movies can be
helpful, they are limited because they do not tell a full story and lack the
characteristics of a counseling situation. Third, although such courses
promote awareness of the importance of cultural factors, self-awareness of
the clinician, and knowledge of cultural factors, the courses often do not
promote culturally sensitive skills, which include the ability to assess and
understand the interactional effects of the cultural dimensions in the shaping
of a person’s identity and the interventions that may be necessary at certain
moments in time. Fourth, new clinicians are generally exposed to
“cookbook” approaches for understanding culture (Speight, Myers, Cox, &
Highlen, 1991), in part because it may be difficult for clinicians to consider
the multiplicity and complexity that understanding cultural dimensions of
identity demands.
This book attempts to fill these gaps in the multicultural training literature by
providing cultural autobiographies from individuals who have contributed
their life stories. We have highlighted and summarized multicultural theory,
research, and literature on oppression and resilience. We have provided a
brief overview of racial identity models for the ethnic minority groups. The
special focus of this text, however, is the cultural autobiographies that
highlight themes from multicultural theory. We selected these contributions
to highlight the effect of cultural factors on values, beliefs, and the
development of identity and self-concept. These stories also present the
interaction of multiple cultural factors including intragroup differences and
sociohistorical developments that affect individual identity. We collected the
stories from students in graduate programs, from professionals, and from
ordinary people who agreed to share their personal histories. To prepare their
contributions for this book, the storytellers used a questionnaire (see
Appendix) as a guide, answering some of its questions and ignoring others,
creating personal narratives that give the reader an intimate glimpse of each
individual storyteller’s life. Each is written to give the reader an
understanding of the personal significance and meaning that cultural factors
play in the authors’ lives, as they perceive them. The identifying
characteristics of the storytellers and their families—such as names,
locations, and certain characteristics—have been changed to preserve their
anonymity. The language, punctuation, and style of the stories have not been
altered much, however, to preserve the authenticity of the story and to honor
the storytellers.
Organization of the Book
This book can be used in upper undergraduate courses that cover
multicultural and diversity topics in psychology, social work, or in graduate
courses in counseling, psychology, social work, human services, or marriage
and family therapy. The text can also be used in Practicum or Internship
courses. This book would also be of interest to new professionals eager to
sharpen their clinical skills, their level of empathy, and their self-awareness.
The book has seven sections. Section I contains the conceptual frameworks
chapters that precede the cultural life stories. It provides an overview of
cultural identity development, oppression, and resilience. Each subsequent
section (Section II through Section VII) contains the life stories. Each section
starts with an opener that covers the theoretical dimensions associated with
the main topic of the section, providing an overview of the predominant
cultural factor, and is followed by the chapters containing the life stories of
that section. Sections and chapters can be read independently from the others.
Although stories have been grouped together according to the predominant
themes of race and ethnicity (Section II), immigration and acculturation
(Section III), religion and spirituality (Section IV), social class (Section V),
sexual orientation (Section VI), and other disability themes (Section VII),
other themes, including gender, regional concerns, and educational
background, are present within the stories.
Others are less well known conceptually, stemming from the authors’
experience as teachers, counselors, and consultants. They are intended to help
the reader find applications of the multicultural theory concepts in a real-life
story and to understand the complexities of identity formation. The content
themes described are not the only ones that can be extracted from these
stories. Not all themes that are obvious in a story have been described
because, in some cases, those themes have been explored in a different
chapter.
We could not have written this book without the contributions from our
storytellers. Thank you for being so open with us and sharing your personal
tragedies and triumphs! Your stories inspire and move us. Thank you also for
not complaining about all the changes in identity that we had to make to fit
our needs and protect your privacy. We hope that we have been able
nonetheless to honor your voice and spirit.
Thanks to Abbie Rickard for wonderful editorial assistance and guidance for
this third edition. We would like to express gratitude to the reviewers for
their comments and feedback. What results is a stronger product. Also,
thanks to Veronica Novak for your invaluable assistance. We thank Mandy
Johnson for assistance in updating references, and lastly, thanks to Kimberly
Buikema for all her help with the online resources for this project.
How people decide to tell their story at one moment in life may vary
according to their self-concept, their developmental stage, and the contextual
dimensions of their lives. We use a framework that includes an ecosystemic
model of development, similar to other cultural identity development models
(Cross & Cross, 2008). Our understanding of personal and cultural identity is
also viewed in light of social identity development, the part of an individual’s
self-concept that derives from knowledge of membership in a group along
with the emotional significance attached to it (Tafjel, 1974).
Developmental Processes
Models of human development teach us about human nature and the
formation of individual identity. When working with clients across the life
span, it is important to consider developmental tasks and activities,
particularly as they relate to behaviors and functioning. Human development
is plastic, fluid, and holistic; it occurs within multiple contexts; and is often
bidirectional because skills gained during one time period may be lost in
another (Berger, 2014). For example, cognitive development is important to
consider when understanding cultural identity and individuals’ perceptions of
themselves as cultural beings. In Piaget’s model, for instance, when school-
age children move from concrete to formal operations, they are engaging in a
cognitive shift that allows them to understand the world in logical terms and
from multiple perspectives (Berger, 2014). In terms of cultural identity
development, it is generally at this stage that children begin to move from a
conceptual understanding of race and gender from a physical standpoint to a
social perspective, with the beginning notions of the sociopolitical context
from which culture is derived (Quintana, 1998; Wright, 1999). In Piaget’s
final formal operations stage, abstract and rhetorical thinking skills are
mastered, allowing individuals who reach it to understand multiple
perspectives simultaneously. When examining clients’ stories, it is important
to consider how cognitive development influences their understanding of the
events in their lives and their ability to develop effective coping and problem-
solving strategies. The stories in this book reflect the storytellers’ shift in
their cognitive appraisal of their cultural identity as they tell us about their
cognitive understanding.
The final area of development that serves as part of the framework for the
stories is moral development. The three major moral development models
(Piaget, Kohlberg, and Gilligan) include the significance of social norms and
interpersonal relationships in resolving moral dilemmas (Berger, 2014).
Piaget postulates that children develop a sense of right and wrong based on
cooperative relationships with each other and conforming to what works best
for the group. Kohlberg suggests that children move from avoiding
punishment to receiving rewards and social praise for their decisions.
Individuals move to an understanding of democratic principles and social
norms before developing a set of universal moral principles. Gilligan argues
that moral development for women differs from that of men because they are
socialized to consider connection and intimacy in decision making (Berger,
2014). No matter which model is considered, it is important to remember that
the issues of justice and equity need to be taken into account, particularly for
people in oppressed groups. The incongruence that individuals often feel
between the sense of these principles and their lived experiences needs to be
reconciled in the process of cultural identity development.
Development of the Self
These traditional developmental models are not enough to understand cultural
identity because they do not address the richness, complexities, and shifting
of an individual’s identity (Almeida, Woods, Messineo, & Font, 1998). In
addition to understanding the role of human development in personality
development and behavioral functioning, it is important to understand the
development of the self and the intersection of cultural factors with self-
concept. There are three components that influence the development of the
self: the notion of the self, the ideal self, and the self reflected in the
perceptions of others. The first layer of the self includes individual
components, including unique personality traits, characteristics, and abilities,
along with innate dimensions of temperament. The second layer of the self
includes the self-ideal, traits and characteristics that are aspired to, along with
goals and aspirations. Additionally, identity is not made up of a self that
develops in isolation and holds still, but is constructed by the social context a
person has been in, is in, and will be in. The view of oneself is not constant,
but is complex, multifaceted, and reflected by others in the person’s life
(Tomm, 1989). Identities are shaped through social interactions with others
(Rockquemore & Laszloffy, 2003). By the time they reach school age and
develop the ability to classify on multiple dimensions, children begin to
understand that others have perceptions of them (Quintana, Castenada-
English, & Ybarra, 1999; Selman, 1971), and they begin to incorporate
others’ perceptions into their perception of themselves. They become
hypersensitive to others’ perceptions and will often elicit feedback from
others on their personality traits, abilities, and characteristics. The knowledge
that others have perceptions that may differ from one’s own underscores the
need for acceptance by peers and the desire to fit in, to be “normal,” and to
feel validated (Rockquemore & Laszloffy, 2003). School-age children begin
to have a solid understanding of group membership, and they become aware
that group membership includes social status (Kerwin & Ponterotto, 1995).
This is carried into the adult years.
Therefore, the sense of self is not developed in a vacuum, but within multiple
contexts. In the field of psychotherapy, explanations for human behavior
have traditionally been individual and psychological in nature and have
tended to contain the narrow idea that an individual or a family’s behavioral
patterns are regulated by personal decision, with an implicit notion of
existential freedom devoid from the shaping of contextual dimensions.
Although it is true that individual psychological explanations are important
and that people do have the freedom to choose their fate to some extent, these
individual dimensions are not enough to understand human behavior,
motivation, and change. People do not wake up one day and decide to act in a
certain way. Historical, sociological, anthropological, political, and
geographical explanations are needed to make sense of a person’s life
choices, life cycle events, and patterns of individual or relational behavior. If
therapists lack the curiosity of an anthropologist to seek out information or do
not become interested in the statistics that a good sociologist provides, much
harm can be done. Counselors, social workers, and psychologists may feel
discomfort facing the daunting task of becoming acquainted with so many
other disciplines to understand human behavior. But the discomfort of feeling
ignorant may be a preferable reaction than indifference and the illusion that
only psychological and individual explanations account for human behavior.
Societal Influences on Development
Social identity theory provides a framework for understanding the contextual
layers of identity development. Social identity is the part of an individual’s
self-concept that stems from knowledge of group membership along with the
emotional significance attached to it (Tafjel, 1974). According to Tajfel, the
development of social identity includes understanding social categorization,
assessing the potential for the group membership to make some positive
contribution to positive social identity, and then integrating, altering, or
discarding components of the social category into self-concept.
Oppression
One major social influence on individual identity development is oppression.
Oppression is a part of the macrosystem and reflects sociopolitical and
sociocultural values and expectations in the country. Oppression may also be
seen in social categorization, a component of social identity as individuals
become aware of images and stereotypes of their cultural groups. People of
color, women, immigrants, and the poor have been overlooked, dismissed,
ignored, or mistreated in a number of ways. When individuals experience
discrimination in a way that makes them feel marginalized or powerless, they
have experienced oppression. Oppression may be understood conceptually as
a relational term that involves “asymmetric power relationships between
individuals, groups, communities and societies” (Nelson & Prilleltensky,
2010, p. 25). It often leads to discrimination, exclusions, exploitation, or
violence directed at the oppressed by those who dominate. The core of
oppression is, then, the inequality in power. To be oppressed is to be unjustly
deprived of the opportunity for “resilient autonomy” (Zutlevics, 2002, p. 84)
or “self-determination” (Prilleltensky, 1994, p. 204).
Several authors have attempted to conceptualize a general theory of
oppression. Allport (as cited in Ponterotto et al., 2001) presented a five-phase
model of “acting out prejudice” as a continuum from least to most extreme,
namely antilocution (prejudicial talk), avoidance (efforts to avoid contact
with individuals of certain groups), discrimination (official segregation in
education, employment, political life, or social privilege), physical attack
(destruction of property, harassment, vandalism), and finally, extermination
(systematic destruction of a group of people solely based on their
membership in that group as in lynching, pogroms, genocide).
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.