Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preface xx
About the Author xxvi
PART
1 Introduction
CHAPTER
1 Introduction to Criminal Procedure 1
Introduction: What Is Criminal Procedure? 2
Sources of Rights 2
Stare Decisis 7
Distinguishing Cases 7
Due Process 10
Crime Control 11
Decision-Making Exercise 1.4 Due Process or Crime Control 12
Finding Cases 15
Judicial Restraint 22
Personal Privacy 22
vi
viii Contents
Pretrial 25
Adjudication 28
Beyond Conviction 28
Summary 29
Key Terms 30
Key Cases 30
Further Exploration 30
Review Questions 31
CHAPTER
2 Remedies 32
Introduction: Remedies for Constitutional
Rights Violations 33
Internal Review 53
Civilian Review 54
Mediation 54
Summary 55
Remedies 55
Key Terms 56
Key Cases 56
Further Exploration 56
Review Questions 58
PART
2 SearchandSeizure
CHAPTER
3 Introduction to Search and Seizure 59
The Core Purpose and Elements of the Fourth Amendment 60
Basic Terminology 61
Seizures of Property 70
Seizures of Persons 71
Justification 72
Probable Cause 72
Reasonable Suspicion 76
Summary 81
Key Terms 82
Key Cases 82
Further Exploration 82
Review Questions 83
Web Links and Exercises 84
CHAPTER
4 Searches and Arrests with Warrants 85
Introduction: Provisions of the Fourth Amendment 86
Components of Warrants 86
Particularity 89
Summary 110
CHAPTER
5 Searches and Arrests without
Warrants 113
Introduction: Moving Beyond the Warrant Requirement 114
Summary 140
CHAPTER
6 Actions Based on Reasonable
Suspicion 144
Introduction to Stop-And-Frisk 145
Summary 166
CHAPTER
7 Actions Based on Administrative
Justification and Consent 170
Introduction: Casting Off the Fourth Amendments Restraints 171
Inventories 171
Inspections 173
Voluntariness 187
PART
3 Interrogations,Confessions,
and
IdentificationProcedures
CHAPTER
8 Interrogations and Confessions 197
Introduction: Getting Suspects to Talk 198
Miranda 204
Interrogation 208
Summary 220
CHAPTER
9 Identification Procedures and the Role
of Witnesses 224
Introduction: Dealing with Witnesses to Crimes 225
Self-Incrimination 227
Lineups 228
Showups 229
Summary 243
PART
4 TheBeginnings
ofFormalProceedings
CHAPTER
10 The Pretrial Process 246
Introduction: The Road to Trial 247
Summary 269
Identification Procedures and the Role of Witnesses 269
Key Terms 270
CHAPTER
11 Prosecutors, Grand Juries, and Defense
Attorneys 273
Introduction: Bringing Charges and Mounting a Defense 274
Joinder 282
CHAPTER
12 Plea Bargaining and Guilty Pleas 304
Introduction: Methods of Avoiding Trial 305
Intelligence 321
Factual Basis 32
Contents xvi
Summary 326
PART
5 Trial,Conviction,
andBeyond
CHAPTER
13 Rights at Trial 329
Introduction: Ensuring an Expeditious
and Fair Trial 330
Summary 352
CHAPTER
14 More Rights at Trial 356
Introduction: More Protections for the Accused 357
CHAPTER
15 Sentencing, Appeals, and Habeas
Corpus 385
Introduction: Closing the Door on the Criminal Process 386
Sentencing 386
Appeals 392
Types and Effects of Appeals 392
The Appellate Process 393
Summary 413
Sentencing, Appeals, and Habeas Corpus 413
Glossary G-1
Notes N-1
Case Index I-1
had taught criminal procedure for several years. During each course, my students typi-cally
asked a litany of what if questions and became curious about the rules of criminal
procedure after the police arrest and book a suspect. Students also expressed frustration
with the fact that many of the leading books on criminal procedure presupposed a cer-tain
degree of familiarity with the criminal process, including an understanding of basic
terminology. Students came to loathe these books excessive use of legalese and obtuse
differences between what the courts require and what happens in the real world of
criminal justice. For instance, consider the definition of a seizure for the purposes of the
Fourth Amendment. A seizure occurs when a reasonable person would believe he or she
is not free to leave. Yet many times, students find this definition wanting and ask, If a
person is not seized according to this definition, is he or she really free to leave? This
question highlights the differences between what this book calls theory and reality. It and
own, one that takes a comprehensive yet basic approach to criminal procedure and that
connects the material to the real world with examples and exercises.
from the point at which an individual first comes into contact with the police all the
way through the appeals process. Approximately half of the book is devoted to tradi-tional
and identification procedures. The remainder of the book moves beyond these topics
and discusses the pretrial process; the roles of defense attorneys, prosecutors, and grand
juries; plea bargaining and guilty pleas; rights of criminal defendants at trial; and appeals
Presentation
The material in Criminal Procedure is covered, in large part, by focusing on the constitu-tional
rights of criminal defendants, as interpreted by the U.S. Supreme Court. To this end,
many leading Supreme Court decisions are discussed; however, lengthy excerpts from the
actual decisions have been reduced to relevant remarks in order to avoid distracting from
the many important concepts introduced. In order to maintain a real-world focus, the book
also incorporates many actual legal documents and excerpts from official policy manuals
of police departments and other criminal justice agencies around the United States.
procedure. Evidence procedure concerns the rules for presenting evidence to prove guilt
(or the lack thereof); thus, evidence courses cover such topics as types of evidence, rules
for presenting witness testimony, hearsay, and the like. This book touches on evidence
only tangentiallyby discussing witness questioning and the police actions used to se-cure
evidence through search and seizure. But the focus on evidence does not move
beyond these two issues. Likewise, this book is not about trial procedure. That is, it does
not address the nuances of criminal trials, including the order of events at trial, what
objections can be raised, instructions to the jury, and so on. Trial procedure is a topic
legal documents and policy guides, readers who are pursuing careers in criminal justice
x
Preface xx
will find this book especially useful. Individuals who are already employed in criminal
justice will find the book useful as well. Moreover, because the book constitutes more
than a general overview of criminal procedure, it should prove beneficial to aspiring law
students. But, it should not be over the heads of students with little or no background in
criminal justice.
Features
Criminal Procedure has a number of pedagogical features that will benefit readers. Each
chapter begins with learning objectives and an outline of the topics covered, giving read-ers
an at-a-glance preview of the content. Lists of key terms and key cases are also
included at the end of each chapter. Each term is defined in a glossary appearing at the
end of the book, and each key case is then highlighted in the margins near where it is
discussed in the chapter text. Each chapter ends with a set of Review Questions, which
cover the basic content and also ask readers to correlate what they have learned. Sum-maries
are also provided at the end of the chapter, with each heading aligning with learn-ing
objectives. Other key features are as follows:
The book makes extensive use of actual legal forms, calls attention to important
rules (such as those spelled out in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure), and
reprints police department policy manual excerpts. Presented as figures, these ma-terials
show how professionals working in the field of criminal justice deal with the
concepts and issues covered throughout the book.
Web Links and Exercises. Each chapter concludes with a few Weblinks and exercis-es
designed to elaborate on and reinforce key issues and points raised in the chapter.
In short, this book is intended to move beyond the basic introductory approach to
criminal procedure that many of the competing books have taken but not to a level that
presupposes any knowledge about the criminal process. Many competing texts focus
overwhelmingly on search-and-seizure and on interrogation and confession procedures.
This book covers these topics as well, and in great detail, but it also covers many more
topics. This is because criminal procedure consists of much more than interactions be-tween
the police and criminal suspects.
New
to the SixthEdition
The sixth edition has been revised in several ways:
The design has been updated and added full color to enhance the learner
experience.
Numerous recent Supreme Court decisions are included, through the 20162017 term.
Case law presentations have undergone additional revisions, with more discussion of
case facts/details throughout.
Chapter 5 includes a new section on cellular phone searches in light of the 2014
Riley v. California decision.
xxii Preface
The section on vehicle stops in Chapter 6 has been expanded to accommodate re-cent
The section on impartial judges in Chapter 13 has been revised and expanded in
Organization
Criminal Procedure continues to be divided into five parts: (1) Introduction; (2) Search
and Seizure; (3) Interrogations, Confessions, and Identification Procedures; (4) The
Beginnings of Formal Proceedings; and (5) Trial, Conviction, and Beyond. The latter
two topics are rarely covered in conventional criminal procedure books, particularly at
the level of detail found in this text. In contrast, the traditional approach to criminal
procedure rarely moves beyond the material covered in the first three parts of this text.
Part 1 contains two chapters. Chapter 1 is introductory and provides readers with
the information necessary to begin studying criminal procedure. In particular, it defines
criminal procedure; highlights the due process/crime control dilemma, which is at the
heart of all controversies in criminal procedure; discusses the relationship among the
courts, including a brief section on how to do legal research; and introduces several is-sues
and trends in criminal procedure. Chapter 1 ends with a detailed overview of the
text. Chapter 2 begins by discussing the exclusionary rule, then it considers criminal,
civil, and nonjudicial remedies. Remedies are presented early in the text so readers will
become aware of how peoples rights can be enforced in the U.S. courts.
and specifies when searches and seizures occur. This chapter also covers the doctrine
and seizures with warrants and without warrants, respectively. Chapter 6 covers actions
based on reasonable suspicion, including stops and frisks and investigative detentions,
and Chapter 7 covers actions based on administrative justification and consent, includ-ing
inventories, inspections, checkpoints, school and office searches, drug and alcohol
Chapter 8 focuses heavily on the Fifth Amendments self-incrimination clause and then
summarizes the proper procedures for conducting interrogations and obtaining valid con-fessions.
Further, it also examines how the Sixth and Fourteenth Amendments govern
the guidelines for proper pretrial identifications, and also introduces identification pro-cedures
used during trial, including the proper questioning of witnesses to assist in valid
in-court identifications.
The information in Part 4is pretrial in nature. Chapter 10 begins by discussing book-ing,
the initial appearance, the probable cause hearing, pretrial release, the preliminary
hearing, and the arraignment. This chapter also introduces the rules surrounding dis-covery.
While discovery can occur well into a trial, most often discovery is pretrial in
nature; thus, it is appropriate to discuss discovery in this context. Chapter 11 covers
prosecutors, grand juries, and defense attorneys, including the constitutional guidelines
by which each must abide. Of course, the actions of prosecutors, defense attorneys, and
even grand juries matter outside the pretrial context, but readers should be familiar
with these important actors before moving into the adjudication section. Finally, Chap-ter
12 covers plea bargaining and guilty pleas. Again, both can occur well into a trial, but
most plea bargains and guilty pleas are undertaken in an effort to avoid trial.
Part 5 is titled Trial, Conviction, and Beyond. Chapter 13, the first of two chapters
about the defendants rights at trial, examines the right to a speedy trial and the right t
Preface xxii
an impartial judge and jury. Chapter 14 continues the focus on rights at trial, discussing
openness, confrontation, compulsory process, double jeopardy, and entrapment. Lastly,
Chapter 15 covers important topics in sentencing as well as appeals and habeas corpus.
As noted earlier, most texts on criminal procedure give only limited coverage to the
topics in Parts 4 and 5, so readers should benefit from the material presented. Once
again, the purpose of this book is to present a comprehensive look at criminal procedure,
demonstrating that the Constitution affects much more than the actions of law enforce-ment
personnel.
Supplements
The 6th edition of Criminal Procedure is supported by acomplete package of instruc-tor
and student resources:
? Instructors Manual with Test Bank. Includes content outlines for classroom
discussion, teaching suggestions, and answers to selected end-of-chapter questions
from the text. This also contains a Word document version of the test bank.
? TestGen. This computerized test generation system gives you maximum flexibility
in creating and administering tests on paper, electronically, or online. It provides
state-of-the-art features for viewing and editing test bank questions, dragging a se-lected
question into a test you are creating, and printing sleek, formatted tests in a
variety of layouts. Select test items from test banks included with TestGen for quick
test creation, or write your own questions from scratch. TestGens random generator
provides the option to display different text or calculated number values each time
questions are used.
Alternate Versions
? eBooks. This text is also available in multiple eBook formats. These are an exciting
new choice for students looking to save money. As an alternative to purchasing the
printed textbook, students can purchase an electronic version of the same content.
With an eTextbook, students can search the text, make notes online, print out read-ing
assignments that incorporate lecture notes, and bookmark important passages
for later review. For more information, visit your favorite online eBook reseller or
visit www.mypearsonstore.com.
xxiv Preface
REVELfor CriminalProcedure,
SixthEdition
byJohnL. Worrall
Designed for the waytodays Criminal Justice students
read, think and learn
REVEL offers an immersive learning experience that engages students deeply, while
giving them the flexibility to learn their way. Media interactives and assessments in-tegrated
directly within the narrative enable students to delve into key concepts and
? REVEL seamlessly combines the full content of Pearsons bestselling criminal jus-tice
titles with multimedia learning tools. You assign the topics your students cover.
Author Explanatory Videos, application exercises, and short quizzes engage stu-dents
and enhance their understanding of core topics as they progress through the
content.
? Instead of simply reading about criminal justice topics, REVEL empowers students
to think critically about important concepts by completing application exercises,
board) assignments.
students have spent reading a section or doing an assignment, as well as points earned
per assignment. This data helps correlate study time with performance and provides a
window into where students may be having difficulty with the material.
institutions, instructors, and students easy access to Revel. Our Revel integration
delivers streamlined access to everything your students need for the course in the
Blackboard Learn and Canvas environments.
and whenever they want. With the REVEL App, students can access REVEL directly
from their tablet or mobile device, offline and online. Reminders and notifications can be
set so you never miss a deadline. Work done on the REVEL app syncs up to the browser
Acknowledgments
I would like to thank those individuals who reviewed the sixth edition: Carina Aquirre,
Everest College and Janet Foster Goodwill, Yakima Valley Community College.
I would also like to thank the reviewers of the first five editions: Scott Belshaw,
University of North Texas; Robert Boyer, Luzerne County Community College; Jack E.
Call, Radford University; Brett Curry, Georgia Southern University; Kevin Daugherty,
University; Russell A. Hunt, Dodge City Community College; Mark Jones, Community
College of Philadelphia; David Kramer, Bergen Community College; Patrick Massaro,
and Technical College, Covington; Brett Curry, Georgia Southern University; Brian
University of South Dakota; Greg Plumb, Park University; Leslie Ridge, Waynesburg Uni-versity;
Louis Roy, West Virginia University at Parkersburg; Kurt Siedschlaw, University
of Nebraska; Margaret Swearingen, Santa Rosa Community College and Carol Lynn Teb-ben,
University of WisconsinParkside.
Special thanks go to the following organizations (including their staff and others who
responded to my many queries): San Bernardino, California, Police Department; Portland
Police Bureau, Strategic Services Division; Abilene, Texas, Police Department; Alameda
County (California) District Attorneys Office; Claremont, California, Police Department;
Gallatin, Tennessee, Police Department; Pine Bluff, Arkansas, Police Department; Sage
as well. Their what if questions and frustration with the traditional, heavy-on-case-law
else involved in bringing the book to press, including Gary Bauer, Tiffany Bitzel, Steve
improvements to this text than I could imagine. Finally, special thanks go to my family,
John L. Worrall is Professor of Criminology and Director of the M.S. Program in Justice
Administration and Leadership (JAL) at the University of Texas at Dallas (UTD). Both
his M.A. (criminal justice) and Ph.D. (political science) were received from Washington
State University, where he graduated in 1999. Dr. Worrall has published articles and book
chapters on a variety of topics ranging from legal issues in policing to crime measurement,
having been ranked one of the most prolific sole and lead authors in the discipline. He has
also authored a number of popular books, including Introduction to Criminal Justice
(with Larry Siegel) and Criminal Procedure: From First Contact to Appeal. Dr. Worrall is
Executive Director of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences and continues to serve
as editor of the journal Police Quarterly, a position he has held since 2008.
xxv
Introductionto
CriminalProcedure
CHAPTER
1
Learning Objectives
Jim Lo Scalzo/EPA/Newsco
2 PARTI Introduction
Introduction:What
Is CriminalProcedure?
American criminal procedure consists of a vast set of rules and guidelines that describe
criminal procedure how suspected and accused criminals are to be handled and processed by the justice
A vast set of rules and guidelines that system. Of great significance is the relationship between the police and the people
describe how suspected and accused
suspected of criminal activity. Criminal procedure arms the police with the knowledge
criminals are to be handled and processed
bythe justice system.
necessary to preserve the rights of individuals who are seized, searched, arrested, and
otherwise inconvenienced by law enforcement officials. It also arms other justice system
professionalssuch as judges, prosecutors, and defense attorneyswith the necessary
information to preserve the rights of individuals accused of criminal activity. In short,
criminal procedure begins when the police first contact a person and ends well after his
or her conviction.
At least three important themes run throughout criminal procedure. First, there is a
concern with the constitutional rights of accused persons, as interpreted by the courts.
People enjoy a number of important rights in the United States, but the bulk of criminal
procedure consists of constitutional procedure or what the U.S. Constitution saysusually
through the interpretation of the U.S. Supreme Court (i.e., the Court)with
regard to the treatment of criminal suspects.
Second, criminal procedure contains an important historical dimension, one that
defers regularly to how sensitive legal issues have been approached in the past. The role
of precedent, or past decisions by the courts, is central. At the same time, though, the
world continues to evolve, and it is sometimes necessary to part ways with the past and
decide novel legal issues.
Third, criminal procedure creates something of a collision between two different
worlds: the world of the courts versus that of law enforcement. What the courts require
and what law enforcement actually deals with do not always harmonize. That is, in the
real world, the influence of the courts may not always be as significant or relevant as
might be expected. The following subsections will elaborate more fully on the impor-tance
of these three themes.
Emphasis
onConstitutional
Rights
The Preamble to the U.S. Constitution states,
We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish
Summarize the constitutional basis
Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the
1 forcriminal
procedure.
general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do
ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
Of particular relevance to criminal procedure are the terms justice and liberty. The
Constitution helps ensure these through both setting forth the various roles of govern-ment
and protecting the rights of people within the nations borders. Throughout the
years, the courts have devoted a great amount of energy to interpreting the Constitution
and to specifying what rights are important and when they apply.
The Constitution is not the only source of rights, however; there are others worthy
of consideration. In addition, some rights are more important than others, at least as far
as criminal procedure is concerned. Finally, federalism (the idea that power is shared
between the federal government and the states) creates a unique relationship between
the federal and state levels. Criminal procedure cannot be understood without attention
to the interplay between federal and states rights.
Sources of Rights
In addition to the Constitution, important sources of rights include court decisions,
statutes, and state constitutions. Most of the court decisions discussed in this section
and throughout the text are U.S. Supreme Court decisions.
Whenever the U.S. Supreme Court (also called the Supreme Court or simply The
Court) interprets the Constitution, it effectively makes an announcement concernin
CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Criminal Procedure 3
peoples rights. For example, the Fourth Amendment states that unreasonable searches
and seizures are impermissible. The term unreasonable is not self-explanatory, however,
so the Court has taken steps to define it. For example, in Wilson v. Layne (526 U.S. 603
[1999]), the Court decided that it is unreasonable for the police to bring reporters along
when serving a warrant, unless the reporters are there to serve a legitimate law enforce-ment
objective.
The Constitution and the courts cannot be expected to protect all of the interests
that people represent. Statutes attempt to compensate for that shortcoming by establish-ing
that certain rights exist. An example is Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. Among
other things, it prohibits discrimination in employment. Another statute of relevance in
criminal procedure is 42 U.S.C. Section 1983. It allows private citizens to sue local law
enforcement officials for violations of federally protected rights.
States have their own constitutions, as well. These are another important source of
rights. The supremacy clause of Article VI to the U.S. Constitution makes it the supreme
law of the land and binds all states and the federal government to it, but nothing in the
U.S. Constitution precludes individual states from adopting stricter interpretations of
the federal provisions. In general, if a state constitution gives less protection than the
federal Constitution, such a limitation is unconstitutional. But a stricter interpretation
of the federal Constitution is perfectly reasonable. For example, the Supreme Court has
interpreted the Fifth Amendment in such a way that it requires police to advise a sus-pect
of his or her so-called Miranda rights when the suspect is subjected to custodial
interrogationan action that does not necessarily rise to the level of an arrest. A state,
however, could require that Miranda rights be read whenever a person is arrested,
regardless of whether he or she is interrogated.
Finally, although it is not a source of rights per se, the Federal Rules of Criminal Federal Rules of Criminal
Procedure deserve some consideration.1 Excerpts from the Federal Rules are reprinted Procedure
throughout this book because they sometimes clarify important rulings handed down by The rules that govern the conduct of all
criminal proceedings brought in federal
the U.S. Supreme Court. Additionally, the Federal Rules set forth the criminal proce-dure
courts
guidelines by which federal criminal justice practitioners are required to abide.
The Fourth Amendment is perhaps the most well-known source of rights in criminal Fourth Amendment
procedure. In fact, it is viewed to be so important that several books on criminal Part of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
Several rights can be discerned by reading the text of the Fourth Amendment. It
refers to the right of people to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures, and
it provides that specific requirements are to guide the warrant process. That is, a
warrant must be issued by a magistrate or judge, supported by probable cause, and
sufficiently specific as to what is to be searched and/or seized. Because of the com-plexity
of the Fourth Amendment, this book devotes an entire section to its interpre-tation
(see Part 2).
4 PARTI Introduction
subject for the same offense to be twice property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall
be compelled in any criminal case to be a This book also examines the Fifth Amendment in detail, focusing in particular on the
witness against himself, nor be deprived
role of the grand jury, the statement that no person shall be twice put in jeopardy of
of life, liberty, or property, without due
life or limb (known as the double-jeopardy clause), the statement that no one can
process oflaw; nor shall private property
be taken for public use, without just be compelled to be a witness against himself (also known as the self-incrimination
compensation. clause), and perhaps most important of all, the requirement that an individual cannot
be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law.
Sixth Amendment The Sixth Amendment is also of great importance in criminal procedure. It specifies,
Part of the U.S. Constitution, which states:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public
shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been
trial, by an impartial jury of the State and
committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be
district wherein the crime shall have been
informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the wit-nesses
committed, which district shall have been
against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor,
previously ascertained by law, and to be
informed of the nature and cause of the and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
accusation; to be confronted with the
witnesses against him; to have compulsory Of relevance to criminal procedure is the Sixth Amendments language concerning
process for obtaining witnesses in his speedy and public trials, impartial juries, confrontation, and compulsory process. The
favor, and to have the Assistance of
Sixth Amendment also suggests that in addition to being public, trials should be open,
Counsel for his defence.
not closed, proceedings. The Supreme Court has interpreted the Sixth Amendment
as providing the right of the accused to be present at his or her trial and to be able to
put on a defense.
Eighth Amendment The Eighth Amendment is relevant in criminal procedure but to a limited extent. It
Part of the U.S. Constitution, which states: states,
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor
excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and
unusual punishments inflicted.
unusual punishments inflicted.
The Eighth Amendments language on bail and the nature of cruel and unusual pun-ishment
Fourteenth Amendment The Fourteenth Amendment has an important home in criminal procedure. It is a
Part of the U.S. Constitution, which fairly long amendment, however, and only a small portion is relevant to the handling
states: All persons born or naturalized
and treatment of criminal suspects. That portion states,
in the United States, and subject to the
jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the
All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction
United States and of the State wherein
thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No
they reside. No State shall make or enforce
anylaw which shall abridge the privileges State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities
or immunities of citizens of the United of citizens of the United States, nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty,
States, nor shall any State deprive any or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction
person of life, liberty, or property, without
the equal protection of the laws.
due process oflaw; nor deny to any person
within its jurisdiction the equal protection
The due process language of the Fourteenth Amendment mirrors that of the Fifth.
of the laws.
Nonetheless, because the Fifth Amendment is part of the Bill of Rights, it is only binding
on the federal government. The Fourteenth Amendment, by contrast, has been used by
substantive due process
Protection from arbitrary and unreasonable the Supreme Court to incorporate, or make applicable to the states, several of the rights
action on the part of state officials. provided for in the Bill of Rights. (The following subsection introduces the so-called
incorporation controversy.)
procedural due process
The Fourteenth Amendments due process clause has been interpreted to consist of
Protection of significant life, liberty, or
two types of due process: (1) substantive due process and (2) procedural due process. The
property interests, sometimes described as
procedural fairness. essence of substantive due process is protection from arbitrary and unreasonable actio
CHAPTER 1 Introduction to Criminal Procedure 5
FIGURE 1.1
? Fourth Amendment: Protects from unreasonable searches and seizures and sets out warrant requirements.
Constitutional Amendments
Important to Criminal
? Fifth Amendment: Provides protection from double jeopardy and self-incrimination; also provides for grand
Procedure and Their
jury indictment and due process protection.
Relevant Provisions
? Sixth Amendment: Provides for a speedy and public trial, impartial jury, confrontation, notification of
charges, compulsory process, and assistance of counsel.
? Eighth Amendment: Protects from cruel and unusual punishment and excessive bail.
? Fourteenth Amendment: Includes the so-called due process clause, which has been used to incorporate
various other rights described in the Bill of Rights.
on the part of state officials. By contrast, a procedural due process violation is one in
which a violation of a significant life, liberty, or property interest occurs. Procedural due
process is akin to procedural fairness.
Summary
Figure 1.1 lists the constitutional amendments that are of particular importance in crimi-nal
procedure. As the following section will describe, certain rights that are provided
for in each amendment may not be binding on the states. Also, even though a particular
amendment may provide a particular right, the Supreme Court may have interpreted
that amendment to apply only in certain circumstances. Such circumstances will be dis-cussed
throughout the text.
It also bears mentioning that the Bill of Rightsand indeed the Constitutionare
only binding on government officials. Private persons are exempt from having to comply
with constitutional restrictions. This is very important and often overlooked. We look
more carefully in Part 2 of the book at this issue as it arrives in the search and seizure
context.
the Bill of Rights so as to restrict state and local law enforcement in the same way federal make certain protections specified in the
Bill of Rights applicable to the states
law enforcement is restricted by the Bill of Rights?
Decision-Making Exercise 11
The First Amendment and Criminal Procedure
The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution provides right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition
that Congress shall make no law respecting an establish-ment the Government for a redress of grievances. Given what you
of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; have read so far, is the First Amendment relevant to criminal
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the procedure?
important concerns about the separation of powers. Namely, the Supreme Court has
decided which rights should be incorporateda decision that may better be reserved
for Congress.
Views on Incorporation
There are four leading views on the incorporation debate.2 One has won out over the
others, but all of the views are important to consider, regardless.
The total incorporation perspective holds that the Fourteenth Amendments due
process clause incorporates the entire Bill of Rights. In other words, all protections
specified in the Bill of Rights should be binding on the states. The primary proponent
of this view was Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black (e.g., Adamson v. California,
332 U.S. 46 [1947]).
The second leading view on incorporation is that of selective incorporation, or the
fundamental rights perspective. It favors incorporation of certain protections enu-merated
in the Bill of Rights, not all of them. Further, this perspective deems certain
rights as being more critical, or fundamental, than others. The Supreme Courts
decision in Snyder v. Massachusetts (291 U.S. 97 [1934]) advocates this perspec-tive,
arguing that the due process clause prohibits state encroachment on those
principle[s] of justice so rooted in the traditions and consciences of our people as to
be ranked as fundamental.
The third view on incorporation can be termed total incorporation plus. This view
holds that the Fourteenth Amendments due process clause incorporates the whole
Bill of Rights as well as additional rights not specified in the Constitution, such as
the right to privacy. This view can be found in such Supreme Court cases as Poe v.
Ullman (367 U.S. 497 [1961]).
Finally, some people believe that the topic of incorporation deserves case-by-case
consideration. That is, no rights should be incorporated across the board. Rather,
the facts and circumstances of each individual case should be weighed in order to
determine if any protections listed in the Bill of Rights should apply at the state or
local level.
First Amendment freedom of religion, speech, and assembly and the right to petition Fiske v. Kansas, 274 U.S. 380 (1927)
for redress of grievances
Fourth Amendment prohibition of unreasonable searches and seizures Wolf v. Colorado, 338 U.S. 25 (1949)
Fifth Amendment protection against compelled self-incrimination Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964)
Fifth Amendment protection from double jeopardy Benton v. Maryland, 395 U.S. 784 (1969)
Sixth Amendment right to counsel Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963)
Sixth Amendment right to a speedy trial Klopfer v. North Carolina, 386 U.S. 213 (1967)
Sixth Amendment right to a public trial In re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 (1948)
Sixth Amendment right to confrontation Pointer v. Texas, 380 U.S. 400 (1965)
Sixth Amendment right to an impartial jury Duncan v. Louisiana, 391 U.S. 145 (1968)
Sixth Amendment right to compulsory process Washington v. Texas, 388 U.S. 14 (1967)
Eighth Amendment prohibition of cruel and unusual punishment Robinson v. California, 370 U.S. 660 (1962)
FIGURE 1.2
Figure 1.2 lists the rights that have been deemed fundamental by the Supreme Court
and, as a result, incorporated to the states.3 The Supreme Court cases responsible for
these incorporation decisions are listed, as well.
TheImportance
ofPrecedent
A precedent is a rule of case law (i.e., a decision by a court) that is bind-ing
Explain the importance of
on all lower courts and the court that issued it. A past decision
2 precedent.
may not be available in each case, but when one is, the courts will
defer to it. This is the doctrine of stare decisis.
Since only a handful of cases make it to the appellate level, and even fewer still
arrive at the Supreme Court, there is an untold number of cases waiting to be distin-guished.
This is a critical point. The case law in place currently addresses only a min-ute
the police and citizens, and several of them may give rise to important constitutional
questions, yet they may never see the inside of a courtroom. So, while this book may
require a review of the nearly infinite possible factual circumstances that could arise
in the criminal process.
An example of a case that was distinguished is Terry v. Ohio (392 U.S. 1 [1968]). In
that case, the Supreme Court held that police officers can stop and frisk suspects with
reasonable suspicion, not probable cause (the latter standard appearing in the text of
the Fourth Amendment). The Court felt that a stop-and-frisk is different from a search
or a seizure and, as such, should be governed by a different set of standards. Had the
Supreme Court not decided Terry, or any case like it, stop-and-frisk encounters would
probably still be considered seizures and therefore subject to the Fourth Amendments
requirement for probable cause. Terry will be considered in more detail later, as will
many other distinguished cases.
In nearly every class on criminal procedure, students ask, What if ...? The what-if
question reflects a concern over possible factual circumstances not already addressed in
published court decisions. In order for a what-if question to be answered, a court deci-sion
must result. Otherwise, the best approach to answering such a question is to look
to the past and find a decision that closely resembles the hypothetical scenario. In this
vein, every case discussed throughout this text should be thought of as a distinguished
case. Every decision was based on some unique set of factual circumstances and was
deemed by the reviewing court as worthy of a stand-alone decision. Were it not for dis-tinguished
Theory
versusReality
Criminal procedure consists mostly of rules and
guidelines that have been handed down by the Compare the theory of criminal
theory world great deal of influence. That is, some court decisions are made in the theory world,
(theoretical world) A term used to illustrate which is somewhat disconnected from the day-to-day operations of law enforcement.
the fact that some court decisions are
In contrast, the police occupy a position that is very definitely in the real world.
divorced from reality and/or may not
directly affect criminal justice officials. Understandably, there can be differences, even tensions, between the worlds of theory
and reality.
real world
The fact that theory and reality may differ is a subject that receives little direct atten-tion
Aterm used to describe the world in which
criminal justice officials, including the in criminal procedure textbooks. Indeed, that certain Supreme Court decisions may
police, operate on a daily basis. not really matter, or might even be flatly ignored, is a controversial notion, to say the
least. Americans are taught that the courtsand the Supreme Court, in particularare
charged with interpreting the Constitution and the laws of the United States. They are
further taught that law enforcement should accept such interpretations uncritically and
Decision-Making Exercise 12
Traditional Legal Doctrine Meets High-Tech Crime
In Katz v. United States (389 U.S. 347 [1967]), the Supreme passengers luggage on a baggage carousel in an airport. Does
Court decided that searches occur when a government this constitute a search? Is Katz equipped to deal with a situ-ation
actor infringes on a persons reasonable expectation of pri-vacy. such as this, or is the situation such that it calls for a
Assume federal agents have a trained drug dog sniff distinguished case
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.