Professional Documents
Culture Documents
vii
viii Contents
Voluntary Acts 42
Possession 43
Failure to Act 44
Speech as an Act 45
State of Mind 46
Specific, General, and Transferred Intent 46
Criminal Law in the News: Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Church
Picketers at Marine’s Funeral 47
The Model Penal Code’s Mens Rea Scheme 48
Criminal Law in the News: Man Shooting Gun into Air Accidently Kills Girl 51
Strict Liability and Mens Rea 52
Capstone Case: Can a Person Be Criminally Punished for Ordinary
Negligence? 53
When Statutes Are Silent on Mens Rea 57
Insanity and Mens Rea 57
Concurrence 57
Capstone Case: How Shall a Court Interpret a Criminal Statute
That Is Silent on Mens Rea? 58
Element Analysis 61
Summary 61
Key Terms 62
Questions for Discussion 62
Critical Thinking and Application Problems 62
Legal Resources on the Web 63
Suggested Readings and Classic Works 63
Notes 64
Summary 149
Key Terms 150
Questions for Discussion 150
Critical Thinking and Application Problems 151
Legal Resources on the Web 151
Suggested Readings and Classic Works 151
Notes 152
Battery 250
Aggravated Battery 251
Mayhem 252
Stalking 253
Sex Offenses 254
Capstone Case: Does Applying Stalking Laws between Spouses Unconstitutionally
Interfere with the Marriage Relationship? 255
Rape 258
Affirmative Consent Laws 261
Sexual Assault 262
Kidnapping and False Imprisonment 262
Kidnapping 263
Capstone Case: Does Moving a Person Four to Nine Feet during the Commission
of a Felony Constitute Kidnapping? 265
False Imprisonment 267
Threat 268
Summary 269
Key Terms 270
Questions for Discussion 270
Critical Thinking and Application Problems 271
Legal Resources on the Web 271
Suggested Readings and Classic Works 272
Notes 272
Frank Schmalleger
Distinguished Professor Emeritus, University of North Carolina at Pembroke
Daniel E. Hall
Professor and Chair of Justice and Community Studies, Professor of Political Science,
and Affiliate Professor of Black World Studies, Miami University
and Visiting Professor of Law, Sun Yat-sen University, China
xvii
New to the Sixth Edition
Chapter-Specific Changes
• In Chapter 1, stories and data were updated, recent federalism developments were added, and
the discussion of common law was edited to be clearer. Throughout the text, Capstone Cases
were moved closer to their textual references.
• In Chapter 2, as suggested by reviewers, the discussion of elements was refined to be clearer, as
was the distinction between civil and criminal negligence.
• In Chapter 3, a new Capstone Case on corpus delicti, decided in 2013, was added, replacing
Smith v. Doe, and the discussions of double jeopardy, ex post facto, and other constitutional
matters were enlarged.
• In Chapter 4, the story of the Cannibal Cop in New York City was added to illustrate the line
between thought and action for conspiracy and several edits were made including reductions
in text length.
• In Chapter 5, discussion related to the shooting of a black teenager by a white police officer
in Ferguson, Missouri, was added; the section on affirmative defenses was rewritten; and the
discussion on the use of deadly force in self-defense was expanded.
• In Chapter 6, a new opening story featuring the horrific case of an insane mother who killed
her children was added. Expanded discussions include recent cases to illustrate entrapment
and insanity at the time of trial.
• In Chapter 7, a new opening story involving felony murder was added; a reduction in the size
of the chapter (including the elimination of one Capstone Case) was made; discussion related
to the causation and the death of James Brady was added; and a new Capstone Case, Burrage v.
United States (2014), has been added.
• In Chapter 8, the Ariel Castro confinement and rape story from Ohio was added to open
the chapter; a discussion of threat as a crime was added; a reordering of a couple of subjects
was made as recommended by reviewers; the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 Whitfield decision
replaced a former Capstone Case; and a discussion of the recent movement at universities to
require affirmative consent for sexual relations has been added.
• In Chapter 9, dated content was removed, recent large-scale computer crimes, such as the
Target breach, are discussed; data was updated; and a new opening story to the section on
arson was added.
• In Chapter 10, the discussion of witness and juror tampering was expanded. A new section on
crimes against the honor and integrity of the United States—featuring the Supreme Court’s
2012 decision in Alvarez as a new Capstone Case—was added.
• In Chapter 11, a new opening story featuring San Francisco’s recently upheld nudity ordinance
replaced the former opening story; and reviewer recommended reductions in content were
made.
• In Chapter 12, the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Jungers was added as a Capstone Case;
data on terrorism and trafficking were updated; and references to recent legislative develop-
ments, some pending, in terrorism and trafficking were added.
• In Chapter 13, the story that gave rise to Payne v. Tennessee now opens the chapter; an ex-
panded discussion of victims at law and factual victims, including public v. private prosecu-
tion, was added; crime data were updated, and a new chart comparing UCR and NCVS data
was added.
• In Chapter 14, capital punishment data were updated to 2014, and recent Eighth Amendment
decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court were added to the discussion of the death penalty.
xviii
New to the Sixth Edition xix
Highlighted Features
Additional Case Applications
Additional Applications follow all of the Capstone Cases. Provided by Dr. John Forren
of Miami University in Hamilton, Ohio, each Additional Application consists of a brief
summary and holding of a case that relates to—and builds on—the issues addressed in the
Capstone Case. Additional Applications appear where an important distinction in the ap-
plication of the law will enhance students’ understanding of the concept. The Additional
Applications (1) delve deeply into the subject matter represented by Capstone Case opin-
ions through the use of lower court cases and (2) attempt to grapple with issues and ques-
tions left unanswered by previous court decisions.
Additional Applications the law which had been expressed prior to the conduct at
issue.” In this context, O’Connor reasoned, Rogers should
have reasonably anticipated that the courts would rule
Can courts retroactively apply a common
Tennessee’s one-year-and-a-day rule to be “an outdated
law rule that defines a crime?
relic” inappropriate for adherence in modern times.
Rogers v. Tennessee, 532 U.S. 451 (2001) In a spirited dissent, Justice Antonin Scalia (joined by
three other members of the Court) voiced strong disagree-
The Case: During an altercation on May 6, 1994,
ment with the majority’s conclusion that Rogers had “fair
Wilbert K. Rogers stabbed James Bowdery in the chest
warning” that the common law rule in Tennessee was sub-
with a butcher knife, necessitating an emergency surgical
ject to retroactive rescission in his case. More fundamen-
procedure to repair Bowdery’s heart. The stabbing victim
tally, Scalia attacked O’Connor’s weighing of the relative
survived the heart surgery; as a direct result of these events,
fairness concerns in drawing a basic distinction between
though, Bowdery developed a condition known as cerebral
legislative and judicial changes in applicable criminal law
hypoxia—which results from a loss of oxygen to the brain—
principles. “Today’s opinion,” Scalia wrote, “produces. . .
and fell into a coma where he remained until his death
a curious constitution that only a judge could love. One
in which [by virtue of the ex post facto clause] the elected
Bowdery’s death, Rogers was convicted by a Shelby County,
representatives of all the people cannot retroactively make
Tennessee, trial court on second-degree murder charges.
murder what was not murder when the act was committed;
Rogers contested the charges on appeal, arguing that
but in which unelected judges can do precisely that. One
Tennessee’s courts had long recognized a judicially created
in which the predictability of parliamentary lawmaking
common law “year-and-a-day rule,” which provided that no
cannot validate the retroactive creation of crimes, but the
defendant could be convicted of murder unless the victim
predictability of judicial lawmaking can do so.”
had died by the defendant’s act within 366 days of that act.
the state stolen metals report to determine if the specific metals sold are registered as
stolen and to determine if the prospective seller is a registered metals thief. If the met-
als appear on the report or the seller appears as a registered metals thief, the owner,
operator, or employee shall not purchase the metals and shall report the offer of sale,
and provide the photographs and other information collected under this section, to the
appropriate local law enforcement agency within one hour. Violation of this section is a
misdemeanor of the first degree. This section shall apply retroactively, to one year prior
to its enactment.
Section 2: Registration as Metal Thief: To reduce theft and to prevent the sale of
stolen metals, a state registry of metal thieves and stolen metals shall be established.
Any person who is convicted in the state of stealing or receiving stolen metals or who
is convicted of violating the Receiving Stolen Metals section above shall register with
the Secretary of State. The Secretary of State shall establish and maintain a report of
metal thieves, as well as a report of missing metals, which shall be made available to the
xx New to the Sixth Edition
■ Describe strict liability offenses, and explain why some crimes are punished solely
on the basis of strict liability.
■ Summarize concurrence, and describe how concurrence relates to mens rea and
actus reus.
xxi
This page intentionally left blank
Acknowledgments
Criminal Law Today owes much to the efforts of many people. Members of the Advisory
Panel, who reviewed drafts of this text as it developed and showered us with comments and
suggestions, deserve special thanks. Advisory Panel members are listed on page iv.
Others who have contributed to this text and to whom we are very grateful are Keiser
University’s John J. Dolotowski, Miami University’s John Forren for providing the
Additional Applications features, Lance Parr of California’s Grossmont College, and Mike
Gray at Maryland’s Eastern Shore Criminal Justice Academy. Thanks also to Morgan
Peterson at California’s Palomar College for assistance in tracking down thorny permissions
issues. David Graff at Kent State University did an excellent job of Web content develop-
ment, and we are in his debt.
This edition has benefited substantially from the suggestions and ideas provided by these
reviewers: Lisa Cason, Columbia College; Jennifer Estis-Sumerel, Itawamba Community
College; Daniel Hebert, Springfield Technical Community College; Barry Langford,
Columbia College; Collin Lau, Chaminade University of Honolulu; William Mulkeen,
Community College of Philadelphia; and Robert Stephens, Jr., University of Cumberlands.
Thanks also to Nina Amster at the American Law Institute for help in working through the
process necessary to obtain permission to reprint selected portions of the Model Penal Code.
We are especially indebted to the fine folks at the Legal Information Institute at Cornell
Law School (including codirectors Thomas R. Bruce and Peter W. Martin), which offers
U.S. Supreme Court opinions under the auspices of the Court’s electronic-dissemination
Project Hermes.
Special thanks go to Alverne Ball and Abinaya Rajendran, Senior Project Managers at
Integra Software Services Private, Ltd. for guiding this project from manuscript to book.
Last but not least, we wish to thank the staff at Pearson who have made this book the qual-
ity product that it is. Many thanks to Gary Bauer, Lynda Cramer, Tara Horton, and Susan
Hannahs, and many other staffers who have brought this book to fruition. Thank you, each
and every one!
xxiii
This page intentionally left blank
About the Authors
Frank Schmalleger, Ph.D., is Distinguished Professor Emeritus at the
University of North Carolina at Pembroke. Dr. Schmalleger holds
degrees from the University of Notre Dame and Ohio State University,
having earned both a master’s (1970) and doctorate (1974) from Ohio
State University, with a special emphasis in criminology. From 1976
to 1994, he taught criminal justice courses at the University of North
Carolina at Pembroke. For the last 16 of those years, he chaired the university’s Department
of Sociology, Social Work, and Criminal Justice. He was named Professor Emeritus in 2001.
As an adjunct professor with Webster University in St. Louis, Missouri, Schmalleger helped
develop the university’s graduate program in security administration and loss prevention. He
taught courses in that curriculum for more than a decade. Schmalleger has also taught in the
New School for Social Research’s online graduate program, helping to build the world’s first
electronic classrooms in support of distance learning through computer telecommunications.
An avid Internet user, Schmalleger is also the creator of a number of award-winning websites,
including one that supports this textbook.
Frank Schmalleger is the author of numerous articles and many books, including the widely
used Criminal Justice Today (Pearson, 2015), Criminology Today (Pearson, 2017), and Criminal
Justice: A Brief Introduction (Pearson, 2016). See his website at www.schmalleger.com.
xxv
Let reverence for the laws,
be breathed by every American mother,
to the lisping babe, that prattles on her lap;
let it be taught in schools, in seminaries, and in colleges;
let it be written in Primers, spelling books, and in Almanacs;
let it be preached from the pulpit, proclaimed in legislative halls,
and enforced in courts of justice.
And, in short, let it become the political religion of the nation;
and let the old and the young, the rich and the poor, the grave and
the gay,
of all sexes and tongues, and colors and conditions,
sacrifice unceasingly upon its altars.
xxvi
1
The Nature and History
of Criminal Law
Heide Benser/Corbis
Chapter Outline
Law is the art of the
Introduction good and the fair.
What Is Criminal Law? —Ulpian, Roman judge
(circa AD 200)
Historical and Philosophical Perspectives
Common Law Tradition [D]ue process . . .
Types of Crimes embodies a system of
rights based on moral
The Purposes of Criminal Law
principles so deeply
Sources of Criminal Law
embedded in the
The Modern U.S. Legal System traditions and feelings
An Adversarial, Accusatorial Due-Process System of our people as to be
The Rule of Law deemed fundamental
to a civilized society as
Objectives conceived by our whole
history. Due process is
After reading this chapter, you should be able to that which comports
■■ Define crime and criminal law.
with the deepest
■■ Summarize the origins and development of criminal law.
notions of what is fair
■■ Describe the role of common law in modern criminal law, and explain the
and right and just.
differences between procedural and substantive criminal law.
—Justice Hugo Black
■■ Describe the various ways in which crimes can be classified, and list the four
(1886–1971)1
traditional types of crimes.
■■ Identify the purposes served by criminal law.
The law is that which
■■ Identify the various sources of criminal law, including the principle of stare decisis.
protects everybody
■■ Describe the structure of the U.S. legal system, including jurisdiction.
who can afford a good
■■ Describe the adversarial and accusatorial qualities of the U.S. system of criminal
lawyer.
justice.
—Anonymous
■■ Expound upon the “rule of law” and explain why due process is an integral part
1
2 Chapter 1
Introduction
In June 2000, Larico Garrett, 22, of Manchester, Connecticut, was arrested for car theft
after he pulled the stolen vehicle he was driving into a convenience store parking lot to
ask a police officer for directions to a nearby street.2 Although he answered the man’s ques-
tions, Officer Robert Johnson found the 2 am encounter suspicious and ran a radio check of
the license plate on the Cadillac that Garrett was driving. When dispatchers reported the
vehicle stolen, Johnson summoned help and drove to the street where Garrett was headed.
Garrett was arrested and charged under Connecticut law with taking a vehicle without the
owner’s permission, a misdemeanor punishable by less than a year in jail.
Figure 1–1
6;2'51(1(('05'5
Crime, Deviance,
and Norm Violation.
Note: Although there are many ways
rules can be violated, only a select few %TKOKPCN
offenses are actually “criminal” acts. #EVU
6CDQQ#EVU
p&GƂCPVq$GJCXKQT
8KQNCVKQPQH/QTGU
8KQNCVKQPQH0QTOU
p7PEKXKNK\GFq$GJCXKQT
+OOQTCN$GJCXKQT
The Nature and History of Criminal Law 3
This expression, “natural law,” or jus naturale, was largely used in the philosophical specu-
lations of the Roman jurists of the Antonine age, and was intended to denote a system of
rules and principles for the guidance of human conduct which, independently of enacted
law or the systems peculiar to any one people, might be discovered by the rational intel-
ligence of man, and would be found to grow out of and conform to his nature, meaning by
that word his whole mental, moral, and physical constitution.5
Ideally, say natural law advocates, man-made laws should conform to principles inherent
in natural law. The great theologian Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274), for example, wrote in
his Summa Theologica that any man-made law that contradicts natural law is corrupt in the
eyes of God.6 A philosophical outgrowth of natural law is natural rights theory. This theory
holds that individuals naturally possess certain freedoms that may not be encroached upon
by other individuals or governments.
A contrasting construct is positive law, which is simply the law that is enforced by the positive law
government. Natural law and natural rights philosophers don’t deny the authority of gov- Law that is legitimately created and
enforced by governments.
ernments to establish positive law, but instead they believe such authority is bounded by
the natural rights of individuals. Some positivists also contend that for law to
be legitimate, it must be created and implemented in ways that are acceptable Law is born from despair of human nature.
to most people (democratic or contractualist positivism).
—José Ortega y Gasset, Spanish philosopher
Natural law principles continue to be influential in many spheres. The
(1883–1955)
modern debate over abortion, for example, relies on the use of natural law
4 Chapter 1
“The criminalization of politics undermines our very “Tom DeLay Gets 3 Years in Prison for Money Launder
system and I’m very disappointed in the outcome,” ing,” Fox News, January 10, 2011,
he said. http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/01/10/
tom-delay-gets-years-prison-money-laundering.
Resources “Former Rep. William Jefferson sentenced to 13 years in
“‘Sorry’ Blagojevich Gets 14-Year Prison Sentence,” prison,” Christian Science Monitor, November 13, 2009,
Chicago Sun-Times, December 7, 2011,
http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/1113/
http://www.suntimes.com/news/metro/blagojevich/
former-rep-william-jefferson-sentenced-to-13-years
9300810-452/sorry-blagojevich-gets-14-year-prison
-inprison.
-sentence.html.
arguments to support both sides in the dispute. Before the 1973 U.S. Supreme
Court decision of Roe v. Wade,7 abortion was a crime in most states (although This law of nature, being . . . dictated by God
himself, is of course superior in obligation to
abortions were sometimes permitted in cases of rape or incest or when the
any other. It is binding over all the globe, and
mother’s life was in danger). In Roe, the justices held, “State criminal abortion all countries, and at all times; no human laws
laws . . . that except from criminality only a life-saving procedure on the moth- are of any validity if contrary to this; and such
er’s behalf without regard to the stage of her pregnancy and other interests of them as are valid derive all their force, and
involved violate the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which all their authority immediately, or immediately
protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman’s quali- from this original.
fied right to terminate her pregnancy.” The Court set limits on the availability —Sir William Blackstone, 1 Cooley’s Blackstone 41
of abortion, however, when it said that, although “the State cannot override
that right, it has legitimate interests in protecting both the pregnant woman’s health and
the potentiality of human life, each of which interests, grows and reaches a ‘compelling’
point at various stages of the woman’s approach to term.” Natural law supporters of the Roe
standard argue that abortion must remain a “right” of any woman because she is naturally
entitled to be in control of her own body. They claim that the legal system must continue
to protect this “natural right” of women.
In contrast, antiabortion forces—sometimes called “pro-lifers”—claim that
the unborn fetus is a person and that he or she is entitled to all the protections Natural law provides a basis in human dignity
by which we can judge whether human beings
that can reasonably and ethically be given to any living human being. Such
are just or unjust, noble or ignoble.
protection, they suggest, is basic and humane and lies in the natural relation-
—Justice Clarence Thomas (1987)
ship of one human being to another. If antiabortion forces have their way,
abortion will one day again be outlawed.
Natural law became an issue in confirmation hearings conducted for the U.S. Supreme
Court justice nominee Clarence Thomas in 1991. Because Thomas had mentioned natu-
ral law and natural rights in speeches given before his nomination to the Court, Senate
Judiciary Committee Chairman Joseph Biden (and others) grilled him about the concept.
Biden suggested that natural law was a defunct philosophical perspective, no longer worthy
of serious consideration, and that the duty of a U.S. Supreme Court justice was to follow
the Constitution. Thomas responded by pointing out that natural law concepts contributed
greatly to the principles underlying the Constitution. It was the natural law writing of John
Locke, Thomas suggested, that inspired the Framers to declare: “All men are created equal.”
Ancient Laws The development of criminal codes can be traced back several thou-
sand years. Although references to older codes of law have been discovered, the oldest
written law that has been found, although only in part, is the Code of Ur-Nammu from
Mesopotamia. It is dated to approximately 2100 BC. Similar to contemporary U.S. law,
it distinguished between compensation and punishment—or in contemporary terms, civil
law and criminal law. For example, the code provided monetary compensation for personal
injuries and punishment (death) for murder, rape, and other “crimes.”
Another ancient law that was found in more complete condition is the Code of
Hammurabi. This code was inscribed on a stone pillar near the ancient city of Susa around
the year 1750 BC. The Hammurabi Code, named after the Babylonian king Hammurabi
(1792–1750 BC), specified a number of property rights, crimes, and associated punish-
ments. Hammurabi’s laws spoke to issues of ownership, theft, sexual relationships, and
interpersonal violence. Although the Hammurabi Code specified a variety of corporal
punishments, and even death, for named offenses, its major contribution was that it rou-
tinized the practice of justice in Babylonian society by lending predictability to punish-
ments. Before the Hammurabi Code, captured offenders often faced the most barbarous and
capricious of punishments, frequently at the hands of revenge-seeking victims, no matter
how minor their offenses had been. As Marvin Wolfgang has observed, “In its day, . . . the
Hammurabi Code, with its emphasis on retribution, amounted to a brilliant advance in
penal philosophy mainly because it represented an attempt to keep cruelty within bounds.”8
Although it is of considerable archeological importance, the Code of Hammurabi probably
had little impact on the development of Western legal traditions. Even though they had
little direct impact on the development of Western law, we learn from these ancient codes
that some legal principles (e.g., distinguishing compensation from punishment, and the
idea of proportionality of punishment) are innate, meaning that they have held signifi-
cance for people for a long time.
of the Catholic Church, canon law, was influential in the development of the
The criminal law . . . is an expression of the
civil law tradition. Although the civil law tradition spread throughout con-
moral sense of the community.
tinental Europe and much of the rest of the world, it was not transplanted to
—United States v. Freeman, 357 F.2d 606
England, where a separate legal tradition developed.
(2d Cir. 1966)
that the case-by-case approach of the common law, based solely on precedent, was too “frag-
mented, flexible, and uncertain” to support the continued economic and social development
of the country. Madison, however, rejected the offer and directed John Quincy Adams to
reply to Bentham, telling him “[either] I greatly overrate or [Bentham] greatly underrates the
task . . . not only of digesting our Statutes into a concise and clear system, but [of reducing] our
unwritten to a text law.” A short time later, Madison also rejected federal use of the written
legal code developed by Edward Livingston, an American follower of Bentham.12
By the late 1800s, however, common law was giving way across America to the authority
of courts to declare the law, and to written civil and penal codes. The Married Women’s
Property Act of 1875, for example, which provided a model for state legislatures of the
period, gave married women control over wages earned independently of their husbands.
The act effectively dissolved the older common law doctrine of unity of husband and wife,
a principle that had given husbands control over their wives’ wages and property. About
the same time, the nineteenth-century jurist David Dudley Field drafted what came to be
known as the Field Code—a set of proposed standardized criminal and civil procedures and
uniform criminal statutes that were adopted by the state of New York and served as a model
for other states that sought to codify their laws.
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.