Professional Documents
Culture Documents
8
Brief Contents
1. About the Author
2. Figures, Maps, Parallel Timelines, and Tables
3. Preface
4. Introduction. Why We Disagree about International Relations
5. 1. How to Think about International Relations: Perspectives, Levels of Analysis, and
Causal Arrows
6. Part I. Historical Patterns
1. 2. World War I: World on Fire
2. 3. World War II: Why Did War Happen Again?
3. 4. The Origins and End of the Cold War
7. Part II. The Contemporary International System
1. 5. Realist Perspectives on Today’s World: Unipolarity, Balance of Power, and
State Actors
2. 6. Liberal Perspectives on Today’s World: Collective Security, Diplomacy,
International Institutions, and Law
3. 7. Identity Perspectives on Today’s World: Democracy, Religion, Nationalism,
and Human Rights
8. Part III. Globalization and Change
1. 8. Realist and Liberal Perspectives on Globalization: Security, Domestic
Economy, Trade, Investment, and Finance
2. 9. Identity Perspectives on Globalization: Development and Environment
3. 10. Critical Theory Perspectives on Globalization: Inequality, Imperialism, and
Injustice
4. Conclusion. Applying Perspectives and Levels of Analysis: The Case of the
Democratic Peace
9. Notes
10. Glossary of Key Concepts
11. Index
9
Detailed Contents
About the Author
Figures, Maps, Parallel Timelines, and Tables
Preface
Introduction. Why We Disagree about International Relations
The Crisis in Syria
Some of the Facts
Sorting Out the Facts
Different Causes or Explanations
Studying International Relations
The Roles of Perspectives, Levels of Analysis, and Causal Arrows
The Role of History
Contemporary Foreign Policy Disputes: The 9/11 Attacks
Realist: Weak versus Strong at Different Levels of Analysis
Liberal: Failed Relationships at Different Levels of Analysis
Identity: Democratic Reform of Governments at Different Levels of
Analysis
Critical Theory: Pervasive Violence at Different Levels of Analysis
The Role of Methods
Rationalist versus Constructivist
Sovereignty: Caused or Constituted
Correlation, Causation, and Process Tracing
Counterfactual Reasoning
Is One Perspective or Method Best?
The Role of Judgment
The Role of Ethics and Morality
Relativist Values
Universal Values
Pragmatic Values
Moral Choice
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
1. How to Think about International Relations: Perspectives, Levels of Analysis, and
Causal Arrows
Prisoner’s Dilemma
The Prisoner’s Dilemma from the Realist Perspective
The Prisoner’s Dilemma from the Liberal Perspective
The Prisoner’s Dilemma from the Identity Perspective
The Realist Perspective
10
Anarchy and Self-Help
State Actors and Sovereignty
Power
Security Dilemma
Balance of Power
Polarity and Alliances
War
The Liberal Perspective
Reciprocity and Interdependence
Technological Change and Modernization: Nongovernmental
Organizations
Diplomacy
Cooperation and Bargaining
Collective Goods
International Institutions
International Law
The Identity Perspective
Ideas and the Construction of Identities
Constructivism
Anarchy Is What States Make of It
Relative Identities
Distribution of Identities
Mapping Identities
Democratic Peace
Other Identity Approaches
Feminism
Critical Theory Perspectives
Marxism
Postmodernism
Levels of Analysis
Systemic Level of Analysis
Domestic Level of Analysis
Individual Level of Analysis
Foreign Policy Level of Analysis
Causal Arrows
Revisiting Explanations of World War I
Key Concepts
Study Questions
Part I. Historical Patterns
2. World War I: World on Fire
Europe in 1914
Realist Explanations
11
The Rise of German Power
Power Balancing: Triple Entente and Triple Alliance
Rigid Alliances and Preemptive War
Future Balances and Preventive War
Power Transition and Hegemonic Decline
Cartelized Domestic Politics and German Aggression
Liberal Explanations
Secret Diplomacy: Bismarck
Clumsy Diplomacy: Wilhelm II
Misperceptions and Mobilization Plans
The Last Move
Weak Domestic Institutions
Insufficient Interdependence: Trade and the Hague Conferences
Identity Explanations
Militant and Racist Nationalism
Liberal Nationalism
Socialist Nationalism
Social Darwinism
Critical Theory Explanations
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
3. World War II: Why Did War Happen Again?
Causes of Madness
Liberal Accounts
Collective Security, Not Balance of Power
The League of Nations
Why the League of Nations Failed
Realist Accounts
Versailles Treaty
Rapallo and Locarno
Germany Expands
Another Two-Front War
Japan and the Pacific War
Why Don’t Hegemons Stop?
Role of Misperceptions in Realist Accounts
Identity Matters
Cultural Nationalism
Liberal and Social Democracy
American Exceptionalism
Communist Nationalism
Fascist and Racist Nationalism
12
Ideological Constructions and Chasms
Critical Theory Perspective
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
4. The Origins and End of the Cold War
The Long Telegram
Snapshot of the Cold War
Realist Explanations
How the Cold War Started
How the Cold War Expanded
How the Cold War Ended
Identity Explanations
How Ideas Started the Cold War
How Ideas Ended the Cold War
Liberal Explanations
United Nations
Truman’s Blundering Diplomacy
NATO and the European Community
Cuban Missile Crisis from a Liberal Perspective
Détente and the Helsinki Accords
The Information Revolution and the End of the Cold War
Critical Theory Perspective
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
Part II. The Contemporary International System
5. Realist Perspectives on Today’s World: Unipolarity, Balance of Power, and
State Actors
Unipolarity
Power Transition Realists
Power Balancing Realists
Minimal or National Realists
Hegemony versus Equilibrium
Balancing Power
Terrorism and Asymmetric Warfare
Rising Powers
Alliances
War
Iraq War, 2002–2006
Aftermath of Iraq War: 2009 to Present
Cyber Warfare
13
Domestic State Actors
Sovereignty
Foreign Policy Decision-Making Process
Failed States
Partition: Two-State Arab–Israeli Solution
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
6. Liberal Perspectives on Today’s World: Collective Security, Diplomacy,
International Institutions, and Law
Collective Security
The First Persian Gulf War
Somalia and Libya
Diplomacy
Peaceful Conflict Resolution: Oslo Accords
Legitimacy: Bosnia and Kosovo
Bargaining: 2003 Iraq War
Interdependence: China and Iran
International Institutions
United Nations
International Economic Institutions
Regional Institutions
European Union
Asian Regional Institutions
Nongovernmental Organizations
International Law
Law and Democracy
International Courts
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
7. Identity Perspectives on Today’s World: Democracy, Religion, Nationalism,
and Human Rights
Democracy
End of History
Democracy in the Middle East
Arab Spring
Resurgence of Authoritarianism
Religion
Clash of Civilizations
Religion Trumps Democracy
Islam and the Muslim World
14
Whither the West and Radical Islam?
Nationalism
What Is Nationalism?
Civic Identity
Nation Building: Iraq and Afghanistan
Human Rights
Universal Human Rights
UN Human Rights Commission/Council
Convention on Women’s Rights
Convention on the Rights of the Child
European Human Rights Regime
Other Regional Human Rights Regimes
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
Part III. Globalization and Change
8. Realist and Liberal Perspectives on Globalization: Security, Domestic
Economy, Trade, Investment, and Finance
Snapshot of Globalization
Security and Economics
Domestic Economic Policies
Macroeconomic Policies
Microeconomic Policies
Trade
Specialization and the Division of Labor
Comparative Advantage
Exceptions to Unrestricted Trade
Strategic Trade Theory
Trade and Jobs
Trade Negotiations
Investment
Resource-Based Foreign Investments
Manufacturing Foreign Investments
Service-Sector Foreign Investments
Multinational Corporations
Immigration Policies
Finance
Exchange Rates
Currency Markets
Balance of Payments
Debt Markets
Global Financial Crisis
15
Eurozone Crisis
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
9. Identity Perspectives on Globalization: Development and Environment
Asia
Economic Miracle
Stable Governments/Unstable Region
Sound Economic Policies
Export-Led Development
Limits to Export-Led Growth
Asian Values
Latin America
Lost Decade
Early Decolonization/Unstable Governments
Import Substitution Policies
Opening Markets
Social Inequality
Sub-Saharan Africa
Poor and Divided Continent
Political Reforms
Economic Reforms
Human Development
Millennium Initiative and Foreign Aid
Middle East and North Africa
Political Reforms/Regional Peace Settlements
Resource (Oil) Curse
Women in Muslim Societies
Environment
Population
Resources
Pollution and Global Warming
Pandemics
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
10. Critical Theory Perspectives on Globalization: Inequality, Imperialism, and
Injustice
Colonialism and Imperialism
Dependency
World Systems
Multinational Corporations and Exploitation of Labor
16
Marginalized Minorities: Global Injustice
Persisting Global Inequality
Summary
Key Concepts
Study Questions
Conclusion. Applying Perspectives and Levels of Analysis: The Case of the
Democratic Peace
Evidence
Explanations
Summary
Coda
Key Concepts
Study Questions
Notes
Glossary of Key Concepts
Index
17
Figures, Maps, Parallel Timelines, and Tables
Figures
Intro-1 What Level of Analysis Do the Causes of the Conflict with ISIS Come From?
5
Intro-2 What Perspective (Cause) Is Driving the Outcomes of the Conflict with
ISIS? 6
Intro-3 The Cause of the ISIS Conflict According to the Realist Perspective, Systemic
Level of Analysis 7
Intro-4 The Cause of the ISIS Conflict According to the Identity Perspective,
Domestic Level of Analysis 8
Intro-5 The Cause of the ISIS Conflict According to the Realist Perspective,
Individual Level of Analysis 8
Intro-6 The Cause of the ISIS Conflict According to the Liberal Perspective,
Regional Level of Analysis 9
Intro-7 The Cause of the ISIS Conflict According to the Identity Perspective,
Domestic Level of Analysis 9
Intro-8 Perspectives and Levels of Analysis: A Synopsis 13
Intro-9 The Causes of the 9/11 Attacks: From the Realist Perspective 17
Intro-10 The Causes of the 9/11 Attacks: From the Liberal Perspective 18
Intro-11 The Causes of the 9/11 Attacks: From the Identity Perspective 19
Intro-12 The Causes of the 9/11 Attacks: From the Critical Theory Perspective 20
Intro-13 How One Thinks about International Relations 29
1-1 Causal Arrows: The Realist View 36
1-2 Causal Arrows: The Liberal View 40
1-3 Causal Arrows: The Identity View 42
1-4 The Realist Worldview 48
1-5 The Liberal Worldview 57
1-6 The Identity Worldview 64
1-7 Causal Arrows: Realist Explanations for World War I 85
1-8 Causal Arrows: Liberal Explanations for World War I 86
1-9 Causal Arrows: Identity Explanations for World War I 87
2-1 The Causes of World War I: The Realist Perspective and Levels of Analysis 105
2-2 The Causes of World War I: The Liberal Perspective and Levels of Analysis 113
2-3 The Causes of World War I: The Identity Perspective and Levels of Analysis 118
2-4 The Causes of World War I: The Critical Theory Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 119
3-1 The Causes of World War II: The Liberal Perspective and Levels of Analysis 134
3-2 The Causes of World War II: The Realist Perspective and Levels of Analysis 148
18
3-3 The Causes of World War II: The Identity Perspective and Levels of Analysis
156
3-4 The Causes of World War II: The Critical Theory Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 158
4-1 First Page of George Kennan’s Long Telegram 163
4-2 The Causes of the Origins and Expansion of the Cold War: The Realist
Perspective and Levels of Analysis 183
4-3 The Buildup of Nuclear Warheads, United States and Russia, 1945–1990 185
4-4 The Causes of the End of the Cold War: The Realist Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 186
4-5 The Causes of the Origins of the Cold War: The Identity Perspective and Levels
of Analysis 191
4-6 The Causes of the End of the Cold War: The Identity Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 195
4-7 The Causes of the Origins of the Cold War: The Liberal Perspective and Levels
of Analysis 202
4-8 The Causes of the End of the Cold War: The Liberal Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 206
4-9 The Causes of the Origins and End of the Cold War: The Critical Theory
Perspective and Levels of Analysis 207
5-1 Polarity: The Realist Perspective from Different Levels of Analysis 221
5-2 Global Terrorist Attacks, 1970–2016 225
5-3 Rising China 226
5-4 Balancing Power and War: The Realist Perspective from Different Levels of
Analysis 240
5-5 State Actors: The Realist Perspective and Levels of Analysis 247
5-6 Domestic Power Struggles: The Realist Perspective and Levels of Analysis 252
6-1 The Growth of Liberal Institutions 258
6-2 Collective Security in Today’s World: The Liberal Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 263
6-3 International Negotiations in Today’s World: The Liberal Perspective and Levels
of Analysis 272
6-4 The United Nations 274
6-5 The European Union: Key Institutions 295
6-6 A Sampling of Transnational NGOs, by Field or Mission Focus 301
6-7 International and Regional Institutions in Today’s World: The Liberal
Perspective and Levels of Analysis 303
6-8 Legal Institutions in Today’s World: The Liberal Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 308
7-1 Freedom in Muslim-Majority Countries versus World Countries 319
7-2 Having a Democratic Political System Is . . . 320
7-3 Democracy in Today’s World: The Identity Perspective and Levels of Analysis
19
324
7-4 Religion in Today’s World: The Identity Perspective and Levels of Analysis 334
7-5 Nation Building and Human Rights in Today’s World: The Identity Perspective
and Levels of Analysis 351
8-1 Globalization: Go with the Flow 364
8-2 Wages of U.S. Trading Partners as a Share of U.S. Wages, Manufacturing 378
8-3 Manufacturing Wages in China on the Rise 379
8-4 Key Issues in Trade: The Realist and Liberal Perspectives and Levels of Analysis
386
8-5 Foreign Direct Investment Inflows: Global and by Group of Economies, 1984–
2016 390
8-6 Key Issues in Investment: The Realist and Liberal Perspectives and Levels of
Analysis 396
8-7 Instruments of International Economic Policy 408
8-8 Key Issues in Finance: The Realist and Liberal Perspectives and Levels of Analysis
409
9-1 Key Factors in Asian Development: The Identity Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 427
9-2 Key Factors in Latin American Development: The Identity Perspective and
Levels of Analysis 438
9-3 Key Factors in Sub-Saharan African Development: The Identity Perspective and
Levels of Analysis 451
9-4 Key Factors in MENA Development: The Identity Perspective and Levels of
Analysis 457
9-5 Projected Energy Consumption, 2003–2030 462
9-6 Key Factors in the Environment: The Identity Perspective and Levels of Analysis
474
10-1 Critical Theory Perspective on Globalization: Globalization as Consequence,
Not Cause 481
10-2 The Causes of Globalization and Development: The Critical Theory
Perspective and Levels of Analysis 499
20
Maps
2-1 Europe prior to German Unification in 1871 96
2-2 Europe and Germany in 1914 98
3-1 Germany before World War II, 1938 135
3-2 Germany and Occupied Territories, 1942 136
3-3 Japan and Japanese-Controlled Territories, 1942 137
3-4 Japanese and Other Territorial Holdings in the Pacific, 1939 141
4-1 The Division of Berlin 168
4-2 The Korean War, 1950–1953 173
4-3 Laos, Cambodia, North and South Vietnam 181
5-1 China’s Nine Dash Line 227
5-2 Russia, Crimea, and Ukraine 229
5-3 Israel 251
5-4 Palestinian Territories 251
7-1 Freedom in the World 315
7-2 The Clash of Civilizations 326
8-1 Labor Patterns Worldwide 380
9-1 Global Development: Country GDP (PPP) per Capita 413
9-2 Income Distribution: Persistent Inequalities and New Opportunities 414
9-3 Asia’s Regions 418
9-4 Latin America’s Regions 429
9-5 Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and the Middle East and North Africa (MENA)
Regions 440
9-6 Climate Vulnerability 470
10-1 Colonialism in the Modern World, circa 1900 483
Conclusion-1 Measures of the Democratic Peace: Democratization, Trade, and
Participation in International Organizations 507
21
Parallel Timelines
2-1 Events Leading to World War I from Different Perspectives 95
3-1 Events Leading to World War II from Different Perspectives 125
4-1 Events Leading to the Origins and End of the Cold War 165
22
Tables
1-1 Prisoner’s Dilemma: A Realist Game 35
1-2 Situation of Prisoner’s Dilemma from Liberal Perspective: Repeated
Communications 37
1-3 Situation of Prisoner’s Dilemma from Liberal Perspective: Change Goals
(Frustrate the Warden) 38
1-4 Situation of Prisoner’s Dilemma from Liberal Perspective: Change Payoffs
(Increase Costs of Defection/Conflict) 39
1-5 Situation of Prisoner’s Dilemma from Liberal Perspective: Change Payoffs
(Reduce Costs of Cooperation) 40
1-6 Situation of Prisoner’s Dilemma from Identity Perspective: Change Identity 41
1-7 Relative and Shared National Identities 71
6-1 Lending and Spending: World Bank Expenditures (in US$ millions) 286
6-2 Membership in Key Regional Organizations 289
7-1 Human Rights: Key Indicators 343
8-1 Comparative Advantage 371
8-2 U.S. Balance of Payments, 2008 (in billions of dollars) 400
9-1 Comparing Development Experiences 475
23
Preface
Confucius, the Chinese philosopher, once said, “To learn without thinking is in vain; to
think without learning is dangerous.” Learning or knowing anything requires both thought
and investigation, theory and facts.
I confirmed Confucius’s insight when I took a break from teaching to serve in government
from 1975 to 1977 and again from 1981 to 1983. At that point, having spent a decade in
the classroom, I thought I would learn at last about how policy was really made. I would
have access to all the facts, even the secret ones kept by intelligence agencies, and I would
understand how those facts relate to policy choices. My first awakening came when an
officer from one of the intelligence agencies paid me a visit, not to give me the facts I so
wanted, but to ask me which facts I might be interested in. Oh, I suddenly realized, “the
facts” depend on what my questions are and what theory or ideas I might wish to test. Now
I had to do some thinking. What did I really want to know? Well, of course, I wanted to
know what was happening. But I didn’t have time to learn about what was happening
everywhere, so I had to focus on certain areas and issues. And I wanted to know not just
facts but what caused these facts. I learned subsequently that intelligence officers often do
not agree on the facts, let alone on the interpretation or the causes of those facts. There is
no one theory that explains policy, no one set of facts that defines any given situation
objectively. There are many theories and many facts—far too many for me to take them all
into account.
When I left the government, I understood better than ever that the policy world is not all
that different from the classroom. Both require theoretical commitment. You have to
decide what you want to learn, what interests you. And that’s a function of your thinking—
or perspective—and your values. And both require empirical effort. You assemble and
investigate as many facts as you can, then you test your ideas against the facts. But, in the
end, you make judgments about which questions and which answers are most important.
The one big difference is that you have more time to deliberate and choose in the
classroom. In government, you have to act quickly because events move quickly and you
lose the opportunity to influence outcomes if you wait too long. As a colleague once said to
me, you consume thought in government; you accumulate it in the classroom.
The idea for this textbook began the day I left government. I wanted to demonstrate for
students the relationship between perspectives and facts for understanding international
relations. It was a long way from there to here, but ultimately the book emerged through
happenstance and history.
The happenstance part occurred when I began teaching a large introductory course in
international relations a few years after leaving the government. I was eager to do this, but
24
it also coincided with efforts at George Washington University’s Elliott School of
International Affairs to design a more coherent interdisciplinary introductory course for
undergraduate majors in international affairs. My task was to come up with a course that
not only shepherded students through the nuts and bolts of world politics but also taught
them how to look at world problems through different disciplinary lenses. I knew a lot
about economics and loved history, and I had always considered my strengths to lie more
on the conceptual than the methodological side of political science, but was I ready for such
a demanding task?
The history part had to do with waiting until I was fully prepared to write this book. My
academic research interests progressed over the years from a relatively narrow focus on the
technological aspects of U.S. foreign policy and international affairs to broader economic
aspects and finally, in the 1990s, to strategic and military aspects. As I broadened my focus,
I taught the introductory course in increasingly bolder strokes, exposing students to
alternative theoretical perspectives—the realist, liberal, and constructivist approaches in
particular—as well as hefty doses of historical narrative and how economic policy
mechanisms work. I worried initially that the design expected too much of students. But I
refused to underestimate young people and worked hard to simplify and illustrate complex
issues, especially the role of perspectives, levels of analysis, and causal arrows. The text is full
of examples that illustrate how perspectives and levels of analysis influence both scholarly
discourse and everyday debates about world politics. And because all perspectives and levels
of analysis are present in any real-world situation, the causal arrows tell us which
perspective and level of analysis are most important in a specific argument.
To my joy, the students really cottoned to this approach. They grasped the big ideas and
applied them, often bringing me newspaper articles to illustrate the different perspectives,
levels of analysis, and causal arrows. After fifteen years of teaching the introductory course
and thirty years of broadening my research interests, happenstance and history came
together, and I put pen to paper. Happily for me, and hopefully for students, too, this book
is the fruit of that labor.
25
Approach of the Book
The purpose of this book is to teach students how to think critically about the subject
matter of international relations. To that end, I introduce readers to the principal
conceptual tools used by students of politics, namely, the main theoretical perspectives of
international relations, the levels of analysis from which we analyze global problems, and
the crucial idea of causality. Throughout the book I apply the perspectives and levels of
analysis as evenhandedly as possible, including the most recent constructivist perspectives,
and I integrate the disciplines of history, economics, and political science into the
presentation. Knowing that this material is both intrinsically interesting and challenging, I
do my best to write in an uncomplicated and engaging style.
First, the book uses the concepts of perspectives and levels of analysis to address all aspects
of international affairs. While most textbooks introduce theories in an opening chapter,
they seldom apply or even mention those theories in subsequent chapters. Some start with a
history chapter before they introduce theory, as if there is only one objective account of
history. By contrast, I start with theories but simplify them using the student-friendly
concept of perspectives. Perspectives focus on certain facts and emphasize certain causes.
For example, realist perspectives point toward powerful actors and emphasize the
distribution of power as the primary cause of world events, liberal perspectives focus on
interactions and emphasize the rules and roles of institutions as primary causes, and
constructivist perspectives highlight ideas and how actors identify themselves and others as
the principal causes.
Similarly, the book addresses multiple levels of analysis within each perspective. While
perspectives highlight the causes of events, the levels of analysis highlight the location from
which these causes come: the individual or decision-making level; the country or domestic
level; and the international system as a whole or the systemic level. There are multiple levels
in between, such as the foreign policy level, which links domestic and systemic levels. I then
use these two analytical devices of perspectives and levels of analysis to discuss and
illuminate the different conclusions that scholars and students of international affairs draw
concerning historical events as well as contemporary issues.
All serious study of international affairs addresses simultaneously all perspectives (power,
institutions, and ideas) and all levels of analysis (individual, domestic, and systemic). The
perspectives and levels of analysis constitute alternative hypotheses about the nature and
direction of the causes of international events. Critical thinking demands that we apply at
least two or more hypotheses to assess empirical evidence. But the point of including
multiple hypotheses at the outset is to weigh the relative importance of each variable and
assess the causal relationship between the variables in drawing conclusions. Thus, the book
gives special attention to the direction of causality among the principal variables of the
26
different perspectives and levels of analysis. For this purpose, I use a device I call causal
arrows. The realist perspective, for example, does not ignore ideas; it just concludes that
power is the primary cause of ideas—big powers think one way, small powers another.
Liberalism does not ignore the balance of power; it just sees diplomacy and international
institutions as the primary means to constrain and eventually reduce the role of the balance
of power in world affairs. And constructivism does not diminish institutions or material
power; it just sees identities and discourse as interpreting and giving meaning to material
and institutional realities. The causal arrows show which perspective (power, institutions,
or ideas) and level of analysis are primary in influencing the others. A fourth perspective,
critical theory, casts doubt on whether we can actually isolate the primary causes of events.
It argues instead that events must be understood in the broadest historical context and are
often caused by deep-seated forces that we can master only, if at all, by achieving new forms
of self-consciousness, not by manipulating individual variables. Critical theory is a reminder
that we may not be able to slice and dice reality into separable causes as our Western
positivist or rationalist methods prescribe.
Second, the book treats the principal realist, liberal, and constructivist or identity
perspectives evenhandedly. I avoid organizing the topics primarily around one perspective
or level of analysis. Scholars often have a preference for one perspective or level of analysis.
Some textbooks, for example, treat realism primarily at the systemic level of analysis,
focusing on states, and liberalism primarily at the domestic level of analysis, focusing on
democracy. This shortchanges realism and loads the dice in favor of liberalism. Other texts
start with “problems,” such as cooperation or war and peace, and assume we can know
what a problem is before we have a theory or perspective of the world that tells us why it is
a problem. But problems don’t just exist objectively; they are identified by perspectives.
Realism sees conflict as the problem; liberalism sees cooperation as the problem;
constructivism sees shared or separate identities as the problem. So any approach that starts
with a problem winds up hiding rather than highlighting perspectives.
Students will encounter opinions throughout their lives that differ from their own, and
they need conceptual equipment to help them appreciate other opinions. One frightful
piece of information from the American Institutes for Research tells us that only 38 percent
of college graduates can successfully perform tasks such as comparing viewpoints in two
newspaper editorials (see Thomas Toch and Kevin Carey, “Where Colleges Don’t Excel,”
Washington Post, April 6, 2007, A21). Somewhere, we as instructors are dropping the ball.
Thus, this book does not start with the presumption that one perspective is best or that
topics or problems can be listed without an understanding of the perspective from which
these topics are considered to be important. Rather, I lead the student into different worlds,
looking at the same reality from different angles. This approach, I believe, is the essence of a
liberal arts education, equipping students to think critically—that is, by alternatives—and
to make their own intellectual choices. I have my own preferences, to be sure, as does any
other instructor, but I believe that all perspectives have a coherent logic and are supported
27
by important evidence from history and contemporary world affairs. Thus, I strive to
present the alternative perspectives not only accurately but also sympathetically.
Fourth, the book is genuinely interdisciplinary. It includes a good deal of history and
economics. Too often in international affairs we do not sufficiently understand other
disciplines, or we simply append them to our instruction in a multidisciplinary rather than
interdisciplinary fashion. In this book, the student learns history and economics through
the relevant political science concepts. For example, the student explores the major wars of
the twentieth century through the realist concept of German unification and the balance of
power (World War I), the liberal concept of collective security and the League of Nations
(World War II), and the identity concept of relative political ideologies—communism and
capitalism (the Cold War). Economics is also presented practically and historically. The
student sees the underlying concepts at work in day-to-day practices of globalization—for
example, when an American consumer uses domestic tax cuts to purchase imports or
borrows money to refinance a mortgage from capital made available by China’s purchases
of U.S. Treasury securities. Policies (including fiscal and monetary) and concepts such as
comparative advantage and strategic trade are explained through historical examples and
disputes rather than through abstract formulas.
Fifth, this book reinforces an emerging trend toward less encyclopedic, more focused texts,
but it does more than that by tying the discussion together with a coherent and central
theme about how the world works from the vantage points of different perspectives. The
book, in short, has a pedagogical “plot”; it is not just a series of “one-act plays” or topics. I
hope that students will experience this book as an adventure, like a good novel or historical
biography: inviting, evolving, and delivering insights that move the reader forward toward
greater and greater understanding. If that happens, the book succeeds in educating as well
as instructing and becomes potentially a reference work that students retain and revisit as
they encounter international issues in more advanced courses and throughout their lives.
Sixth, and to this end, I employ a direct and engaging writing style that avoids professional
jargon and textbook ennui. Students are easily bored by concepts and topics presented in an
obligatory fashion, much like an endless list of addresses in a telephone book. They sense
the difference between professional and pedantic instruction. The prose in this book is
professional yet light and, I hope, occasionally humorous. It seeks to reach a generation
raised on the internet by enticing and entertaining as well as by teaching.
28
New to the Sixth Edition
The sixth edition retains the same organization of the fifth edition but sharpens further the
causal arrow feature. The text now discusses each causal arrow that appears in the margins
and helps the student understand the causal argument illustrated by that arrow. As a way to
get students started on this approach, begin by having them identify the levels of analysis
from which various events are coming. Then, after they become more proficient in that
exercise, ask them to label these events by identifying the various causes or perspectives at
work—formation of an alliance coded as power, a diplomatic conference coded as
institutions, or the Arab Spring coded as ideas. Finally, get them to exercise judgment in
deciding, based on the evidence, which way or ways the causal arrows might run between
the various perspectives and levels of analysis. (At some point in the semester, let them
jump ahead to the Conclusion to see how this is done in the case of the democratic peace.)
The sixth edition of the textbook begins with this kind of three-step exercise applied to the
ISIS conflict in the Middle East.
This edition retains the deep historical coverage of World War I, World War II, and the
Cold War, not only because that history is still relevant today but also because these wars
provide such rich and illuminating cases of the way perspectives, levels of analysis, and
causal arrows lead historians to disagree about the causes of these wars even when they look
at the same facts.
The sixth edition also updates substantially the middle chapters of the book in Part II,
which focuses on the contemporary international system. The discussion takes into account
recent developments dealing with the rise of nationalism, mounting terrorist attacks, the
Islamic caliphate, Iran, North Korea, Russian aggression in Ukraine, Chinese assertiveness
in the Pacific islands, cyber warfare, Great Britain’s exit from the European Union, and the
use of social media in political protests around the world. In Part II, I devote a single
chapter to each perspective’s view of the contemporary world from the different levels of
analysis. This approach reduces the number of moving parts the student has to consider.
He or she can see the world primarily from a realist perspective in Chapter 5, then jump to
Chapter 6 to see it primarily from a liberal perspective, and move on to Chapter 7 to see it
from an ideational perspective. By the end of this middle section, the student has a clear
idea of how the perspectives differ when examining the contemporary world.
The new edition further updates the globalization section (Part III). Here I address
changing events such as populist reactions to global trade, growing debt problems around
the world, sluggish energy markets, slowing global growth, accelerating migrant and refugee
flows, and the latest developments affecting climate change. Part III retains the separation
between material aspects of development examined in Chapter 8, namely the relative and
absolute gains that realist and liberal perspectives emphasize, and the normative aspects of
29
growth, namely growth for whom and what that identity perspectives emphasize. This
division helps the student see the continuing relevance of perspectives in the economics
section of the course. The book retains the chapter on critical theory perspectives on
development, which is an essential critique of the rationalist focus on Western and material
aspects of development.
The sixth edition continues to feature the beautiful full-color, eye-catching design that
captures the student’s attention and facilitates the grasp of key concepts. Of particular note
are the handful of new color maps, some of which show topographical detail in order to
help students understand how geography matters to politics. The design also offers a
visually distinct way of portraying the causal arrows for perspectives and levels of analysis.
In this way the student is reminded throughout the text of the two key concepts that
distinguish this text from all others. The new edition also includes more than seventy
photos and visually appealing maps, tables, and graphs that display important concepts and
key data and empirical findings. Happily, this new design comes at no additional cost to
students.
30
Key Features
Each of the book’s pedagogical features contributes directly to the balance and coherence of
the volume by helping students keep track of the different perspectives and levels of analysis
and allowing students to see how these are applied in contemporary debates:
The book’s causal arrows appear where there is explicit discussion of the interactions
among perspectives and levels of analysis. The arrows help students hone their ability
to see which perspective or level of analysis a scholar or world leader is emphasizing as
the cause of a particular problem or world event. Students see, for instance, whether
power struggles (realist), weak institutions (liberal), or cultural differences (identity)
weigh more importantly in explaining ethnic conflicts. The causal arrows have been
refined so that they do more than just point to instances of causality in the text; now
they explicitly lay out the order of causality showing how one perspective and level of
analysis dominates in a particular argument. The causal arrow on this page illustrates,
for example, the argument that the interdependence created by the Helsinki Accords
in the mid-1970s diminished the distrust between the Soviet Union and the United
States and created the space for New Thinking that eventually contributed to the end
of the Cold War. We take great care to locate the arrows directly adjacent to where
they are discussed in the text to help instructors amplify those discussions of causality
and ensure that students grasp the concepts.
Also further refined are the “Perspective and Levels of Analysis” figures, which help
students summarize and keep track of the various explanations of events covered from
the different perspectives and levels of analysis. Their new layout is designed to help
students better grasp the flow of ideas from each level of analysis.
Graphic Parallel Timelines appear in the historical chapters, offering simultaneous
chronologies of major historical events and movements and placing the different
events under the particular perspectives that would most likely emphasize them.
A marginal glossary provides succinct explanations of key concepts, with a definition
in the margin the first time each term (in boldface) is discussed at length.
Twenty-four unique maps help students absorb important geopolitical, demographic,
and thematic information.
Nearly seventy full-color photos greatly enhance the book’s art program and help
students visualize important events and issues.
Key concepts appear in boldface when first discussed in the book and are listed at the
31
ends of chapters with their page reference for ease of review.
Thought-provoking study questions at the end of each chapter provide a basis for in-
class discussions and help gauge student comprehension.
A complete glossary at the end of the book fully defines each key term and helps
students prepare for exams.
32
SAGE edge for CQ Press
SAGE edge offers a robust online forum featuring an impressive array of tools and
resources for review, study, and further exploration. SAGE edge content is open access and
available on demand at http://edge.sagepub.com/nau6e.
SAGE edge for Students helps enhance learning and offers a personalized approach to
coursework in an easy-to-use environment.
SAGE edge for Instructors supports teaching by making it easy to integrate quality
content and create a rich learning environment that helps students perform at a higher
level. Go to http://edge.sagepub.com/nau6e and click on “instructor’s resources” to
register and begin downloading resources.
Test banks provide a diverse range of prewritten options as well as the opportunity to
edit any question and/or insert personalized questions to effectively assess students’
progress and understanding.
Editable, chapter-specific PowerPoint slides offer complete flexibility for creating a
multimedia presentation for the course.
An instructor’s manual features chapter overviews and objectives, lecture starters,
ideas for class activities, and discussion questions.
A set of all the graphics from the text, including all the maps, tables, and figures, is
available in PowerPoint, PDF, and JPEG formats for class presentations.
Exclusive! Access is provided to full-text SAGE journal articles that have been
carefully selected to support and expand on the concepts presented in each chapter to
encourage students to think critically.
A Transition Guide provides a chapter-by-chapter outline of key changes from the
fifth edition to the sixth.
33
Acknowledgments
I dedicate the book to all my former students, both graduate and undergraduate, who
inspired me to teach better. I mention five in particular: Alan D. Buckley, who teaches at
Santa Monica College; Ann Becker, who runs her own consulting firm in Chicago; Gabriel
Szekely, who taught at El Colegio de Mexico and served in past years as chief of staff to the
Mexican minister of tourism; Jim (or James P.) Lester, who taught at Colorado State
University until his untimely death; and Roy H. Ginsberg, who is professor emeritus at
Skidmore College. Their friendship and success are the true rewards of teaching.
Colleagues who have helped are far too numerous for me to mention them all. Several,
however, were particularly encouraging and read the whole or portions of the manuscript
and contributed comments. One even volunteered to use an early draft of the manuscript
in his undergraduate class; that was especially helpful. I am deeply grateful to them all: Alan
D. Buckley, Santa Monica College; Colin Dueck, George Mason University; Marty
Finnemore, George Washington University; David Forsythe, University of Nebraska–
Lincoln; Roy Ginsberg, Skidmore College; Jolyon Howorth, Yale University; Aida Hozic,
University of Florida; Bruce Jentleson, Duke University; Peter Katzenstein, Cornell
University; Stuart Kaufman, University of Delaware; Bob Keohane, Princeton University;
Charles Lipson, University of Chicago; John Mearsheimer, University of Chicago; Scott
David Or, Texas Lutheran University; Robert Paarlberg, Wellesley College; Thomas Risse,
Free University of Berlin; Randy Schweller, Ohio State University; David Shambaugh,
George Washington University; Janice Stein, University of Toronto; and J. Ann Tickner,
University of Southern California.
Other colleagues who offered helpful advice at various stages include Christine Barbour,
Indiana University; Larry Berman, University of California–Davis; Bruce Bueno de
Mesquita, New York University and the Hoover Institution; Dan Caldwell, Pepperdine
University; Gary Jacobson, University of California–San Diego; Sam Kernell, University of
California–San Diego; Robert Lieber, Georgetown University; Mike Sodaro, George
Washington University; C. William Walldorf, Wake Forest University; and Steve Wayne,
Georgetown University. I had a string of research assistants to help me on this project. I
thank, in particular, Mark Romaniw, Bethany Remely, and Jordyn Cosmé. For earlier
editions, I owe a special debt to Jamie Kebely, Sandy Snider-Pugh, David Tarre, Ikuko
Turner, Michael Wain Alex Forster, and Andrea Powell, who helped me balance this
project with other obligations and thus preserve my sanity through very intense months of
work.
I have never worked with a more professional and pleasant staff than the one at CQ Press.
And they have been with me throughout the life of the book. Charisse Kiino was my first
contact with CQ Press about this book. I never thought negotiating a contract could be
34
done without stress, but it was with Charisse. Elise Frasier made so many contributions to
the original book and subsequent editions that it would not be what it is without her. She
and, in the early editions, Charisse not only solicited numerous detailed and thoughtful
critiques of the manuscript from outside reviewers, but they also dived into the details of
the project, drafted summaries and tables of issues raised, and discussed these issues with
me during numerous extended brainstorming sessions. I was astonished at their
professionalism—they must have had good instructors in international relations—and
deeply grateful, even when they pinned my ears back on many needed adjustments. Other
CQ and now Sage professionals have assisted in subsequent editions. They are identified on
the copyright page. I was warned that a textbook writer’s nightmare is to have editors
interfere either too much or not enough. I lived a dream because the CQ Press touch was
absolutely perfect.
I can’t thank my past and current reviewers enough. They were the most thorough and
tough I have encountered in any peer-review process. Some have consented to be
mentioned here:
35
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.