Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Between 1500 and 1750, European expansion and global interaction produced
vast wealth. As goods traveled by ship along new global trade routes, piracy also
flourished on the world’s seas. Pillaging the Empire tells the fascinating story of
maritime predation in this period, including the perspectives of both pirates and
their victims. Brushing aside the romantic legends of piracy, Kris Lane pays care-
ful attention to the varied circumstances and motives that led to the rise of this
bloodthirsty pursuit of riches, and places the history of piracy in the context of
early modern empire building.
This second edition of Pillaging the Empire has been revised and expanded to
incorporate the latest scholarship on piracy, maritime law, and early modern state
formation. With a new chapter on piracy in East and Southeast Asia, Lane con-
siders piracy as a global phenomenon. Filled with colorful details and stories of
individual pirates from Francis Drake to the women pirates Ann Bonny and Mary
Read, this engaging narrative will be of interest to all those studying the history of
Latin America, the Atlantic world, and the global empires of the early modern era.
Kris Lane holds the France V. Scholes Chair in Colonial Latin American History
at Tulane University. He is the author of Colour of Paradise: The Emerald in the Age
of Gunpowder Empires and Quito 1599: City and Colony in Transition. He is currently
writing a book on the colonial history of Potosí, Bolivia.
This page intentionally left blank
PILLAGING THE EMPIRE
Global Piracy on the High Seas,
1500–1750
Second Edition
Kris Lane
Second edition published 2016
by Routledge
711 Third Avenue, New York, NY 10017
And by Routledge
2 Park Square, Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon OX14 4RN
Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business
© 2016 Taylor & Francis
The right of Kris Lane to be identified as author of this work has been
asserted by him in accordance with sections 77 and 78 of the Copyright,
Designs and Patents Act 1988.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or
utilised in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now
known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in
any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing
from the publishers.
Trademark notice: Product or corporate names may be trademarks or registered
trademarks, and are used only for identification and explanation without
intent to infringe.
First edition published by Routledge, 1998
Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data
Lane, Kris E., 1967–
Pillaging the empire : global piracy on the high seas, 1500–1750 / Kris
Lane. — Second edition.
pages cm
Includes bibliographical references and index.
1. Pirates—America—History. 2. Privateering—America—History. 3. America—
History, Naval. 4. Pirates—History. 5. Privateering—History. 6. Naval history,
Modern. I. Title.
E18.75.L36 2015
364.16'4—dc23
2015006441
ISBN: 978-0-7656-3841-0 (hbk)
ISBN: 978-0-7656-3842-7 (pbk)
ISBN: 978-1-315-72226-9 (ebk)
Typeset in Bembo
by Apex CoVantage, LLC
For Pamela and Ximena, por supuesto!
For what is history, in fact, but a kind of Newgate calendar, a register of the crimes
and miseries that man has inflicted on his fellow man? It is a huge libel on human
nature, to which we industriously add page after page, volume after volume, as if we
were building up a monument to the honor, rather than the infamy of the species.
Introduction1
Conclusion209
Tables
4.1 Seventeenth-Century Taverns of Port Royal, Jamaica 97
4.2 English Buccaneer Captains of Jamaica and Tortuga, c. 1663 101
Maps
1 Atlantic Winds and Ports 6
2 The Caribbean Basin in the Age of Piracy 14
3 The Pacific Basin in the Age of Piracy 44
4 Eastern Seas in the Age of Piracy 63
5 The Pacific Coast of South America in the Age of Piracy 67
6 Greater Southeast Asia in the Age of Piracy 162
Figures
1.1 An Early Modern Mediterranean Galley 10
1.2 French Corsairs Raiding a Spanish Settlement 18
1.3 French Raiders Attacked by Native Americans off Margarita Island 19
1.4 A Sailor’s Revenge in Cartagena, 1544 21
2.1 The Jesus of Lübeck34
2.2 Engagement between Golden Hind (Cacaplata) and Cacafuego41
2.3 Measuring the Sun’s Meridian Altitude with an Astrolabe 54
3.1 Antonio de Morga’s San Diego Meets Olivier van Noort’s Maurice
off the Philippines, 14 December 1600 72
3.2 View of Paita, Peru 76
3.3 A Seventeenth-Century Spanish Galleon 85
x Tables, Maps, and Figures
In 1502, on his fourth and final voyage, Christopher Columbus happened upon a
great trading canoe just off the coast of Honduras. It was “long as a galley,” as Fer-
dinand, the Admiral’s thirteen-year-old son recalled, and carved from one great tree
trunk. Neither its twenty-five naked paddlers nor the richly clad men who appeared
to be their masters offered any resistance as the Spaniards seized the craft, and they
remained paralyzed with fright as the bearded strangers rifled through the cargo. It
was only when some cacao beans were allowed to spill from their containers in the
course of the looting that they momentarily forgot their fear, scrambling to retrieve
them “as if they were their eyes.”1
excused acts of piracy against Spanish subjects as “robbing the robbers.” Were
they not pirates all?
Defining piracy, as these examples suggest, has always been problematical,
always subject to multiple perspectives, always plastic in the hands of nationalist
historians. As with all “concise narratives,” this one attempts to avoid partisanship,
accommodate multiple points of view, celebrate nothing, condemn no one, and,
in short, simply try to make some “objective” sense out of apparent chaos.Though
revisionist in some ways, the present text follows the more traditional history
of piracy in that it focuses primarily on the activities of Spain’s, and to a lesser
extent Portugal’s, post-conquest enemies in the Americas. It is less traditional in
its attempt to place the seaborne attackers of these Iberian powers in a broader,
world-historical context and to view most of their acts as pecuniary rather than
nationalistic in nature. In this regard, I hope the book attains a kind of structural
and perspectival coherence.
Given the enduring popularity of the topic, old and new books on piracy
abound. Some of these works are wonderfully detailed and well researched, and
the true enthusiast should consult them rather than this volume for the nitty-gritty
of pirate life (several of the better ones are listed in the bibliography). Even better,
and of easier access than ever with electronic advances, are the several pirate jour-
nals published in the late seventeenth and early eighteenth centuries and reissued
in various forms to the present day. For the interested lay reader and perhaps the
undergraduate student, however, few scholarly treatments of piracy in history have
offered a general, concise overview of the phenomenon as it developed in Ameri-
can waters, including the Pacific, during the early modern era (c. 1450–1750).
There are a few exceptions, but in general these works tend to lack in depth what
they possess in breadth; either the pirates themselves are romanticized and reduced
to caricatures, or Spain’s seaborne empire, the usual victim of pirate attacks, is
misrepresented or its pivotal role is simply downplayed. The present study has
benefited greatly from the work of many conscientious scholars who over the
years have recognized these deficiencies in the literature and have worked to flesh
out both the Spanish side of the story and the social complexities of pirate and
privateering crews of varying nationalities. These more narrowly focused works,
usually restricted to one region and time period, have been invaluable informants
to the present project, and in order to avoid any hint of literary piracy on my own
part, I have attempted to give them full and accurate credit wherever it is due.
The central narrative of this book owes much to the careful scholarship of
numerous historians, most notably Kenneth Andrews, Paul Hoffman, Cornelis
Goslinga, David Cordingly, Peter Earle, David Marley, and Clarence Haring for
the Caribbean region and Peter Bradley and Peter Gerhard for the Pacific; without
their work this study would have taken a lifetime of archival research and at least
nine lifetimes of accumulated wisdom. Other first-rate sources exploited include
the works of Tonio Andrade, Charles Boxer, Giancarlo Casale, Cheng Wei-Chung,
J.H. Parry, John B. Wolf, Carla Rahn Phillips, Marcus Rediker, Robert Ritchie,
Preface and Acknowledgments xiii
Mendel Peterson, and the pirate historian’s pirate historian, Philip Gosse. Outside
of a few primary pirate bits encountered by me in South American and Spanish
archives, the present volume makes no attempt at originality beyond the general
aim of producing a companion text on piracy suitable for World History or simi-
lar courses. For the reader interested in reconstructing pirate life (without, it is
hoped, reviving pirate atrocities), I have included such sidelights as instruction in
dice throwing, seventeenth-century style, and select (modern) recipes for pirate
dishes and drinks.
The pirates were often superb storytellers, and while the following narrative
drifts into analysis from time to time, it is the pirates’ stories, along with those
of their victims, that make up the core of this book. I have tried to leave moral,
legal, and psychological reflections to the reader whenever possible, but a confes-
sion of bias should help to clear up potential ambiguities. Like the great historian
Carlo Cipolla, who in the course of his studies accumulated more knowledge of
cannons and warships than any other specialist of early modern Europe, I am a
self-proclaimed pacifist and landlubber—beyond this my specialty is early modern
Spanish American history. Thus, in the course of the following narrative I may
appear to side with the people being beaten up and robbed or those getting sea-
sick and drowning. With these confessions in mind, the reader will discover that
I view the pirates of this period much as the vegetarian views the butcher shop,
with an uneasy combination of fascination and horror.
The more mundane horror of long nights at the word processor was mitigated
by the constant support of my wife, who carried our first child just as this book
was gestating. In her long-suffering way she unintentionally reminded me that her
task was infinitely more challenging than my own—certainly the product of her
labors, a beautiful little girl named Ximena, has proved to be more entertaining.
She will be going to college as this second edition goes to press, and I may not be
the first parent driven to piracy by the high cost of post-secondary tuition. Other
sources of encouragement included the late Robert Levine of the University of
Miami History Department and Stephen Dalphin, former executive editor at M.E.
Sharpe. For this second edition, I offer special thanks to M.E. Sharpe editors Steve
Drummond and Irene Bunnell and to the kind and helpful staff at Routledge. As
for outside readers and other partners in crime, I wish to thank the indefatigable
John Crocitti at the University of Miami and Joan Campbell and Creston Long at
the College of William & Mary; their insights and criticisms were much appreci-
ated. Arne Bialuschewski offered many helpful comments and suggestions for the
second edition. In the spirit of American individualism, on the other hand, I am
proud to announce that this book was produced with absolutely no financial assis-
tance from state, federal, municipal, or private foundations—a fact that gave rise
to the unfortunate rumor that I had discovered a cache of pirate loot among the
Florida Keys. If only it had been so. I would like to credit the History Department
of the University of Miami, however, for allowing me to develop my thoughts on
early modern piracy during my year-long visitorship in an experimental course
xiv Preface and Acknowledgments
entitled “Piracy in the West Indies.” Finally, many thanks to the students of that
course for their enthusiasm and curiosity; they and the many others I have taught
since, at William & Mary and now at Tulane University (both founded with pirate
loot), reminded me that in spite of such painfully overwrought films as Cutthroat
Island, the spirit of piracy in the Americas is alive and well.
Crimes such as piracy may not pay in the long run, but they certainly offer
scholars and other writers plenty to chew on and, it must be said, to regurgitate.
One could even say that piracy provides another kind of parasitical livelihood,
that of pirate scholar. Speaking of parasites, this new edition of Pillaging the Empire,
much like the first, clings like a leach upon the scholarship of others. Even so, in
the intervening years since the book first appeared in 1998, I have had the good
fortune to come across many more original documents in European and Latin
American archives relating to pirate attacks and reprisals. I have not attempted
to rewrite this book, but rather to expand its geographical scope, to update its
bibliography, to insert a few choice findings, and to correct some lamentable
errors. My gut feeling about the subject has not changed: I remain fascinated and
repulsed in equal measure.
In current English usage, “West Indies” refers to islands in the Caribbean Basin;
I have attempted to keep to this distinction although in Spanish colonial terms
“The Indies” referred to all of the American colonies (and to overseas colonies in
general, including “East Indian” places such as the Philippines).
Note
1 Inga Clendinnen, Ambivalent Conquests: Maya and Spaniard in Yucatan, 1517–1570 (Cam-
bridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 3.
This page intentionally left blank
A CHRONOLOGY OF EARLY
MODERN PIRACY
For many readers whose first language is English, the word “piracy” brings to mind
these verses from Robert Louis Stevenson’s Treasure Island. Stevenson’s Long John
Silver, Ben Gunn, Israel Hands, Captain Flint, and other colorful pirate characters
had analogues and even namesakes in the early modern past, but these characters,
at least as we know them, were essentially products of a late nineteenth-century
literary imagination. For historians of the early modern world, and of early Span-
ish America in particular, a striking feature of many English-language pirate
novels such as Treasure Island, and even some pirate histories, is the conspicuous
absence of the Spanish and their colonial subjects, the pirates’ principal victims
in the Americas for more than two centuries. Pirates certainly fought amongst
themselves, but “pieces of eight” and “Spanish doubloons” were usually taken
from Spanish towns and Spanish ships. While the omission of the Spanish side of
the story may be harmless at the level of fiction, it distorts history. As will be seen,
piracy in the Americas took many forms during the long period between Colum-
bus’s landfall and the great pirate trials of the early eighteenth century—these will
be explored in chronological order and in some detail. From the Spanish point
of view, the pirates, mostly men of French, English, and Dutch heritage who pre-
ferred to call themselves merchants, privateers, “gentlemen of fortune,” and so on,
were simply foreign criminals, and as such deserved no quarter. In the long run,
defense against these interlopers cost Spain’s empire dearly.
2 Introduction
The present study is not intended to deflate the romantic image that pirates
have enjoyed in the popular imagination, even, it should be noted, among Span-
ish and Spanish American readers. The pirates need not be debunked, exposed, or
judged at this late stage. Rather, as there is a growing interest among historians
of the early modern world in activities that tied very distant regions together for
the first time—among them long-distance trade, mass migration, and religious
proselytization—a world-history approach to piracy might also serve a purpose.
Pirates have been studied in particular regions and time periods in the Americas,
but they remain to be treated in the aggregate in terms of their larger historical
context, and this study is an attempt in that direction.
A word on definitions is in order. From the Spanish view, and often the Portu-
guese as well, northern European and other interlopers in American, African and
Asian waters they claimed were pirates (piratas), or unsanctioned sea-raiders. This
was often the case, but as will be seen there were also many acts of “privateering,”
or raids carried out under license from a monarch (or other governing body)
during wartime. Other interlopers often referred to as pirates by the Spanish were
actually smugglers, though often well-armed and aggressive ones. These are the
basic distinctions, but numerous synonyms for pirate, such as “buccaneer” and
“freebooter,” arose in the seventeenth century—for these I refer the reader to the
glossary. The key to all such terms is point of view, of course, but to the pacifist
the majority approach the universal, or at least classical, hostis humani generis; the
pirates were “enemies of humankind.”
The basic features of the Spanish empire in the Americas will be outlined
first, as an understanding of what the pirates were after, and were up against, is
necessary to tracing their trajectories in American waters. Chapter 1 will focus
on the activities of mostly French corsairs (from the contemporary Spanish term,
corsario) in the Spanish Caribbean between 1500 and 1559, but a short treatment
of sixteenth-century piracy in the Mediterranean and East Atlantic is included to
give context to the French problem.The French threat in the Americas coincided
with a rise in anti-Spanish piracy along the so-called Barbary, or Berber, Coast of
North Africa, a substantial phenomenon of long duration. Spanish expansion into
North Africa after the so-called Iberian Reconquest (711–1492) led to a chronic
pirate problem that would outlast the early modern period, always affecting Span-
ish views toward piracy in the Americas.
Chapter 2 treats the rise of the English “Elizabethan” pirates, a bold group
that included such notable figures as John Hawkins and Francis Drake. The
Elizabethans, as the name suggests, were active during the long reign of Queen
Elizabeth I (1558–1603), a period that also saw Spain, under the equally
long-lived Philip II (1556–1598), rise to preeminence in Europe. As in other
cases, the Elizabethan pirates often became privateers, or crown-sanctioned
mercenaries, during wartime, in this case after 1585. War or no war, however,
from the Spanish point of view Drake and his compatriots were still pirates
Introduction 3
when attacking Iberian targets “beyond the line,” that is, in waters claimed by
Spain or Portugal.
The next wave consisted largely of Dutch pirates—or privateers, since most
were sanctioned by an incipient Dutch state—active from about 1570 to 1648.
They are the subject of Chapter 3. As with many of the Elizabethans and even
some of the earlier Protestant French corsairs, the Dutch resented Spain’s reli-
gious orthodoxy almost as much as its political power. Much of the northern
Netherlands, under radical Protestant leadership by the late 1560s, was engaged
in a massive rebellion against Catholic Spanish control, and the animosity spread
from land to sea. Thus Dutch activities against Spanish and Portuguese domin-
ions in the Americas and elsewhere during this period might be seen as an exten-
sion of the so-called Eighty Years War (1568–1648), which ended with Spain’s
recognition of Dutch independence. Dutch maritime intrusion into American
waters had serious commercial aims as well, however, and these helped to blur
the lines between trade, war, and criminal piracy. In the long run, Dutch preda-
tion in Spanish waters was not as damaging as that of the Elizabethans, but the
temporary loss of northeastern Brazil was a huge blow to Portuguese interests,
formally united with Spain between 1580 and 1640. An exception to this trend
was a raid led by Piet Heyn, a veteran of the Brazil conflicts and an outstand-
ing sea captain who managed to take a legendary treasure from the Spanish in
Matanzas Bay, Cuba, in 1628. Heyn was well armed and openly sponsored by
the Dutch West India Company, and was thus a respected naval officer rather
than a criminal in his homeland. His return to Amsterdam with 15 million guil-
ders’ worth of American treasure upset European financial markets and deeply
wounded Spain’s international credit. Unsurprisingly the Spanish remember Piet
Heyn as a pirate.
Chapter 4 introduces the first sea predators in the Americas universally recog-
nized as pirates: the seventeenth-century buccaneers. This motley group of Eng-
lish, French, Dutch, Danish, and even renegade Spanish and Portuguese subjects
harried Spanish—and later English, Dutch, and French—shipping in the Carib-
bean Sea after about 1630. Their origins and major exploits, including Henry
Morgan’s sack of Panama in 1671, will be detailed up to the early 1680s. The era
of the buccaneers might be considered the “golden age” of piracy in the Americas,
but, perhaps paradoxically, it coincided with Spain’s financial and political decline.
The buccaneers were only one of many problems faced by the ailing empire, and
were thus often weakly countered, but emerging English, French, Dutch, and
Danish colonies in the Caribbean joined in the fight to suppress the buccaneers
after about 1683. Many pirates were forced to raid elsewhere due to growing mer-
chant and planter interests, and Chapter 5 follows a number of these same Carib-
bean pirates into the Spanish Pacific, or South Sea, as it was then called, where
they were active between 1680 and 1694. The South Sea buccaneers included
some of the most famous journal-writing pirates of the period, among them
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.