Professional Documents
Culture Documents
T his text is designed specifically for nurses and nursing students who have an interest in global health as a specialty,
regardless of experience or education level. It reflects both the unique contributions of the nursing profession and of
other disciplines, which is in keeping with the editors’ perspective on how to bring about lasting change. The text views
global health through a nursing lens, but maintains this awareness and appreciation of interprofessionalism throughout.
The editors and contributors have firsthand experience of the complex dynamics in achieving global health, and bring a
wealth of knowledge to this important field, which has grown as a course and specialty. The text depicts the worldwide ex-
pansion of nursing partnerships between resource-rich and resource-limited countries, discusses challenges and obstacles,
and provides cases and guidance on how to achieve global health. It will appeal to all nurses, from student nurses embark-
ing on a global health experience to more experienced global health nurses who offer professional nursing expertise from
around the world.
The text responds to a recent WHO mandate, which seeks the input of nurses and midwives as part of an interprofessional
team of key strategists for facilitating global health. The Lancet report is also an important document used throughout
the text, and an interview with Dr. Julio Frenk, author of that report, is included. Social, political, cultural, economic, and
environmental factors—including climate change—are integrated into determinants of global health. The text covers the
foundations of global health, including the emerging concept of climate justice, the ethical context of global health, and
the importance of interprofessional education. It addresses key issues of global health with a focus on poor and vulnerable
Global Health
individuals—particularly women and children—and those living in areas of conflict. In addition to describing notable
accomplishments toward achieving global health, the book focuses on the need for increasing access to primary care,
improving clinical practice through expanded education, and engaging interdisciplinary researchers in discovery of viable
solutions. The book includes the perspectives of nurses and colleagues from other disciplines in both resource-rich and
resource-limited countries. References provide resources for additional study, and PowerPoint slides and a test bank for
Nursing
instructors accompany the text.
Key Features
• Case studies depict real-world experiences
• Presents firsthand knowledge of global health dynamics, challenges, and opportunities
• Provides a wealth of information from multiple perspectives
•A
uthored by contributors across a variety of clinical and academic roles who are experienced in global health nursing
and global health in the
• Includes chapters written by nurses from both resource-limited and resource-rich countries
Contributors xi
Preface xvii
Share Global Health Nursing in the 21st Century
vii
viii • Contents
Index 565
Contributors
Hester C. Klopper, PhD, RN, RM, MBA, FANSA President, Honor Society of
Nursing, Sigma Theta Tau International; Professor, Northwest University and
University of the Western Cape, Pretoria, South Africa
Ann Kurth, PhD, RN, FAAN Professor and Executive Director, New York
University College of Nursing Global; Associate Dean for Research, New York
University Global Institute of Public Health, New York, New York
Elissa C. Ladd, PhD, RN, FNP-BC Associate Professor, MGH Institute of
Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts
Rana Limbo, PhD, RN, PMHCNS-BC, CPLC Bereavement and Advance Care
Planning Services, Gundersen Health System, LaCrosse, Wisconsin
Teri Lindgren, PhD, MPH, RN Assistant Professor, Rutgers the State
University of New Jersey, Newark, New Jersey
Jianhua Lou, RN Chief Nursing Officer, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center,
Shanghai, China
Antonia Makosky, MS, MPH, ANP-BC Clinical Assistant Professor, School of
Nursing, MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts
R. Kevin Mallinson, PhD, RN, AACRN, FAAN Associate Professor, Assistant
Dean Doctoral Division, School of Nursing, College of Health and Human
Services, George Mason University, Fairfax, Virginia
Bridget E. Meedzan, BS Clinical Research Coordinator, AED Pregnancy
Registry, Pediatrics Department, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston,
Massachusetts
Nancy L. Meedzan, DNP, RN, CNE Associate Professor, School of Nursing,
Endicott College, Beverly, Massachusetts
Jayden Nadeau, RN, MSN, PMHNP-BC Nurse Practitioner, ConnectionsAZ,
Phoenix, Arizona
Busisiwe P. Ncama, PhD, RN Associate Professor, Dean and Head of School,
Nursing and Public Health, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Howard College
Campus, Durban, South Africa
Patrice K. Nicholas, DNSc, DHL (Hon), MPH, MS, RN, ANP, FAAN Director
of Global Health and Academic Partnerships, Brigham and Women’s Hospital;
Senior Nurse Scientist, Division of Global Health Equity and Center for Nursing
Excellence; Professor, MGH Institute of Health Professions School of Nursing,
Boston, Massachusetts
Annie Lewis O’Connor, PhD, MPH, NP-BC Director, Women’s C.A.R.E. Clinic,
Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
xiv • Contributors
John Palen, PhD, MPH Senior Human Resources for Health (HRH) Advisor,
Abt Associates, Washington, DC
Ceeya Patton-Bolman, MSN, RN Program Coordinator, Team Heart, Inc.,
Newton, Massachusetts
Suzanne S. Prevost, PhD, RN, COI, FAAN Dean, University of Alabama
School of Nursing, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
Eleonor Pusey-Reid, RN, DNP, MS, MEd, CCRN Clinical Assistant Professor,
MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts
Sally Rankin, PhD, RN, FAAN Professor and Associate Dean, Global Health
and International Programs, University of California, San Francisco, San
Francisco, California
Kim Rochon, MSN, RN MGH Institute of Health Professions, Boston,
Massachusetts
Ellen Schell, PhD, RN, FAAN International Programs Director, Global AIDS
Interfaith Alliance; Associate Adjunct Professor, School of Nursing, University of
California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California
Michele Shedlin, PhD Professor, College of Nursing, New York University,
New York, New York
Anne Sliney, RN, ACRN Chief Nursing Officer, Clinton Health Access
Initiative; Faculty, Brown University AIDS Program; Chief Nursing Officer,
Clinton Foundation, Boston, Massachusetts
Barry H. Smith, MD, PhD President and Chief Executive Officer, The Rogosin
Institute; Director, The Rogosin Institute of Dreyfus Health Foundation;
Director, Research, The Rogosin Institute Xenia Division; Professor of Surgery,
Weill Medical College of Cornell University; Attending Surgeon, New York-
Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell, New York, New York
Allison Squires, PhD, RN Assistant Professor, Deputy Director, International
Education and Visiting Scholars, New York University College of Nursing,
New York, New York
Susan Stevens, DNP, MEd, MSN, PMHNP-BC Clinical Instructor, MGH
Institute of Health Professions, Boston, Massachusetts
Hsin-Ling Tsai, MHA Dreyfus Health Foundation of the Rogosin Institute,
Taipei, Taiwan
Lynda Tyer-Viola, PhD, RNC, FAAN Director, Women’s Services, Texas
Children’s Hospital; Adjunct Faculty, Texas Woman’s University–Houston
Campus, Houston, Texas
Contributors • xv
‡ Deceased
Preface
T he genesis of this book occurred when the editors posed the following question,
“Is there a need for a text on global nursing that encompasses the work of nurs-
ing, the complex issues that affect the health of the world’s people, and nursing’s
contributions to interprofessional efforts to achieve global health?” So began the
journey that has culminated in this text, Global Health Nursing in the 21st Century.
When we set out to answer this question, we discovered a paucity of nursing
texts related to global nursing and embraced the idea that the literature would be
enriched by the contribution of this book. During our review of existing scholarly
works, we discovered several contributions to the global health literature from the
fields of public health, international health, and global health. However, most texts
were written by experts from other disciplines and few explored the unique contri-
butions of the nursing profession to the interprofessional landscape of global health.
In retrospect, this observation should not have been unexpected. While it is
widely understood that nurses represent the vast majority of the global health
workforce, and that nurses and midwives play a critical role in health care delivery,
their expertise is often overlooked or—at the least—undervalued. Indeed, nurses
have been late in being invited to join other key stakeholders, such as health scien-
tists, physicians, economists, public health professionals, and international devel-
opment experts, in the discussions that shape global health. However, there is a
growing recognition that nurses and midwives are essential to providing quality,
people-centered care, and improving the cost effectiveness of that care. The World
Health Organization (WHO) publication, Nursing and Midwifery Services: Strategic
Directions 2011–2015 (2010), acknowledges nursing’s absence and strongly advo-
cates that “…governments, civil society and professional associations must work
together with educational institutions, nongovernmental organizations (NGOs)
and a range of international and bilateral organizations to remedy the situation so
that the input of nurses and midwives is actively sought and acknowledged” (p. 3).
Likewise, Frenk et al. (2010) have shifted the paradigm of those educated
in the health professions and have enlisted not only educators and u niversities,
students and young health professionals, but also NGOs, international philan-
thropic organizations, and foundations to promote the reform needed for the
health professions to address the health of the world’s people in the 21st century.
These authors contend that both institutional and instructional reforms are
needed to achieve a model transformative professional education. As they state:
“The result will be more equitable and better performing health systems than
at present, with consequent benefits for patients and populations everywhere
xvii
xviii • Preface
in our interdependent world” (p. 4). One of the hallmarks of Frenk et al.’s
mandate—interdependence—requires a shift to interprofessional and transpro-
fessional education, as it is well understood that collaboration and teamwork
result in better patient outcomes. Along with the strategic directions recom-
mended by the WHO (2013), Frenk et al.’s mandate strengthens the argument
that nurses are integral members of the global health team. They suggest that
past laudable efforts to reform the health professions to suit contemporary needs
have “…mostly floundered, partly because of the so-called tribalism of the
professions—that is, the tendency of the various professions to act in isolation from
or even in competition with each other” (p. 1). Nurses worldwide must embrace
and advocate for Frenk et al.’s vision that:
both within and outside personal relationships and country-specific conflicts are
explored. The likelihood that women and girls will experience negative health
effects related to violence is also examined within the scope of their vulnerability
to HIV/AIDS and their forced participation in sex trafficking. The impact of HIV/
AIDS and its detrimental effects on the nursing workforce in sub-Saharan Africa,
which experiences a disproportionate burden of the disease, are also explored in
this unit. Maternal mortality and childhood malnutrition are additional health
risks experienced by women and children that are discussed in Unit II.
Finally, while much work toward achieving global health is underway and
there have been notable accomplishments, Unit III addresses areas where efforts
must be redoubled to achieve success. This unit focuses on seeking and imple-
menting solutions necessary to realize this overarching goal. The work of critical
stakeholders working within governmental organizations, NGOs, and founda-
tions is described. Collectively, their efforts are centered on increasing access to
primary health care; increasing access to services that would otherwise be unavail-
able (e.g., surgical services); improving clinical practice by expanding educational
opportunities for both students and practicing nurses and midwives; and engag-
ing interdisciplinary researchers in the discovery of viable solutions to these
challenges. At the core of achieving global health—and the overarching goal of the
text—is the understanding that many of the initiatives highlighted are strategies
aimed at strengthening health systems and achieving global health equity. The
goals are achievable in the 21st century and represent a contemporary human
rights obligation.
We are proud of the development of Global Health Nursing in the 21st Century.
The chapters provide nurses and those interested in nursing’s contribution to the
field of global health, a comprehensive survey of the range of issues. This knowl-
edge is essential to understanding how to best influence the health and attain-
ment of human rights for people worldwide. In closing, we offer a quote from
Nelson Mandela, who espoused the issues of equity during his journey toward
achieving justice for the people of South Africa and, more broadly, the world.
His vision embraced equity in all aspects of life and has relevance for social
justice, human rights, and global health.
Let there be justice for all. Let there be peace for all. Let there be work,
bread, water, and salt for all. Let each know that, for each, the body,
the mind, and the soul have been freed to fulfill themselves. The sun
shall never set on so glorious a human achievement.
—Nelson R. Mandela
Statement of the President of the African National Congress
at his inauguration as president of the
Democratic Republic of South Africa, 1994
Suellen Breakey
Inge B. Corless
Nancy L. Meedzan
Patrice K. Nicholas
xx • Preface
References
Birn, A.E., Pillay, Y., & Holtz, T.H. (2009). Textbook of international health: Global health in a
dynamic world. (3rd ed). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Frenk, J., Chen, L., Bhutta, Z. A., Cohen, J., Crisp, N., Evans, T., … Zurayk, H. (2010). Health
professionals for a new century: Transforming education to strengthen health systems
in an interdependent world. The Lancet, 376, 1923–1958. Retrieved from http://www
.healthprofessionals21.org/docs/HealthProfNewCent.pdf
World Health Organization. (2010). Strategic directions for strengthening nursing and midwifery
services (SDNM) 2011–2015. Geneva, Switzerland: Author. Retrieved from http://
www.who.int/hrh/resources/nmsd/en
Share
Global Health Nursing in the 21st Century
Unit I
1
2 • Unit I: Foundations of Global Nursing
the relationships between global health and community-public health nursing and
the conceptual overlap of the disciplines in Chapter 6. In the last chapter of this
unit, Sliney discusses the importance of bidirectional relationships for the success
of global health partnerships and that the wisdom of those in resource-limited set-
tings must be respected and embraced. In summary, Unit I provides the founda-
tion for understanding the sociopolitical, economic, and cultural complexities that
factor into the landscape of global health.
Chapter 1
The burgeoning discipline of global health has increased in scope and complexity
since the beginning of the new century. Despite these advances, Farmer, Kleinman,
Kim, and Basilico (2013) contend that identifying global health as a discipline is
premature. Rather, they view global health as a collection of problems that affect
the health of the world’s people. Transformation from professional commitment to
a unique discipline will require interdisciplinary efforts aimed at rigorously analyz-
ing and solving the areas of concern for global health (Farmer et al., 2013). Global
health emerged as a new concept arising from the earlier disciplines of public health
and international health. Koplan et al. (2009), writing on behalf of the Consortium
of Universities for Global Health Executive Board, note that:
These authors advocate for the adoption of a common definition of global health
that encompasses a broad range of health challenges (for example, maternal child
health, infectious diseases, noncommunicable and chronic diseases, and environ-
mental health issues). They argue that establishing and agreeing on a common
definition is critical to prioritizing and advancing the work of global health. The
authors also discuss the scope of global health in terms of both the problems to
be addressed and its geographical reach. Koplan et al. contend that global health
should not be restricted to health issues that cross international borders. Moreover,
they suggest that:
infection are clearly global. But global health should also address
tobacco control, micronutrient deficiencies, obesity, injury prevention,
migrant-worker health, and migration of health workers. The global
in global health refers to the scope of problems, not their location.
(p. 1994)
Based on this rationale, Koplan et al. (2009) propose the following definition:
“Global health is an area for study, research, and practice that places a priority on
improving health and achieving health equity in health for all people worldwide”
(p. 1995).
Global health—like public health but unlike international health—must
address domestic health disparities as well as cross-border issues (Farmer et al.,
2013; Koplan et al., 2009). As noted by Farmer et al. (2013), global health’s ante-
cedent term was international health, which emphasized the nation-state as the
important focus. In their view, global health includes the role of nonstate insti-
tutions, including international nongovernmental organizations (NGOs), private
philanthropies, and community-based organizations. Koplan et al. (2009) recom-
mend that global health must also address the “training and distribution of the
health-care workforce in a manner that goes beyond the capacity-building interest
of public health” (p. 1994). They offer a view on global health that is relevant for
global medicine and nursing:
Critical to a robust definition of global health, they argue, is agreeing on the goals,
strategies, approaches, and skills needed by health professionals to achieve global
health outcomes. Birn, Pillay, and Holtz (2009) suggest that while international
health primarily focused on health issues in underdeveloped countries and the
efforts by industrialized countries and international agencies to address these prob-
lems, to preserve their self-interests, the concept of global health reconceptualizes
and depoliticizes international health to rise above the past ideological underpin-
nings of colonialism. This shift is also embedded in the recent Institute of Medicine
(IOM, 2009) report on The U.S. Commitment to Global Health: Recommendations for the
Public and Private Sectors. This report resulted from the convening of the Committee
on the U.S. Commitment to Global Health to investigate the U.S. commitment to
global health and articulate a vision for U.S. involvement in global health issues.
The report identified five areas for action:
Finally, this report notes that: “The United States has the responsibility as a global
citizen, and an opportunity as a global leader, to contribute to improved health
around the world. U.S. leadership in global health is a reflection of American
values: generosity, compassion, optimism, and a wish to share the fruits of our
technological advances with others around the world” (p. 3). This responsibility
and commitment are also embraced by countries around the world. However, it is
important to note that some argue that one of the negative aspects related to global
health is that the United States attempts to assert unilateralism and dominate the
international health agenda to meet its own national interests at the expense of
international interests (Birn et al., 2009). Other industrialized countries may also
need to closely examine the motivations behind their efforts.
The field of global health emerged from the 19th-century work in public health in
the United Kingdom, Europe, and the United States. Public health was influenced
by the growing understanding of communicable diseases as well as the ability
to gather data; to focus on population health rather than individuals; social jus-
tice and equity; and an emphasis on prevention rather than curative care (Koplan
et al., 2009). Further, the IOM (1988) embraced the importance of public health in
The Future of Public Health report, which formalized the mission, goals, and organi-
zational framework for public health and defined the mission as “fulfilling society’s
interest in assuring conditions in which people can be healthy” (IOM, 1988), thus
setting the stage to move public health to a global arena for societies worldwide.
Fried et al. (2010) suggest that “public health has unique, and critically important,
roles in creating global health and well-being” (p. S7 and original); further, they
note that public health principles are foundational to global health approaches.
Fried et al. also support the following key principles for global health leadership.
• Core values that include commitment to the public good and health as a human
right
• A frame of reference that prevention is cost-effective and critical to accomplish-
ing health for all
• Health promotion accomplished through a combined platform that engages
science, evidence, experience, matching solutions to needs, shared knowledge,
and a commitment to equity that is translated into practice
• Health systems and global public health leadership that includes a commitment
to the most effective, evidence-based approaches to prevention and care in inte-
grated health systems and with an approach to continual learning
• A continuum of prevention, treatment, and care (Fried et al., 2010, p. S8)
6 • Unit I: Foundations of Global Nursing
Fried et al.’s focus on global health also espouses a critical understanding of how
population health is changing globally and that health professionals will confront
old and new public health challenges in the years from 2030 to 2050 that include
“the health challenges related to longevity and aging; chronic diseases (noncom-
municable and communicable); the physical environment and climate change; the
built environment and urbanization; disasters and conflicts shifting food sources
and water and food security; population migration; and disparities and vulner-
able populations” (Fried et al., 2010, p. S9). Similar to Koplan et al. (2009) and their
call for a consistent definition of global health, Fried et al. suggest that clarity is
needed in finding solutions to these health challenges. Their views are shared by
Farmer et al. (2013) in that they propose engaging in science, technology, and prac-
tice for success in global health leadership.
International health emerged within the science of public health. Merson, Black,
and Mills (2006) describe a framework that applies the principles of public health to
challenges that affect low- and middle-income countries. However, this framework
does not address the bidirectional issues that occur across countries or consider
the fact that international health should also address the health needs of people in
all countries. The Global Health Education Consortium (2009) explored the con-
cepts of global versus international health and suggested that international health
is more focused on health systems, policies, and practices with a lens on differences
between countries rather than common health challenges shared across countries.
Koplan et al. (2009) discuss the overlap of public health, international health, and
global health. Specifically, they discuss the three areas as sharing certain character-
istics that include “priority on a population-based and preventive focus; concen-
tration on poorer, vulnerable, and underserved populations; multidisciplinary and
interdisciplinary approaches; emphasis on health as a public good and the impor-
tance of systems and structures; and the participation of several stakeholders”
(pp. 1993–1994). Most notably, they argue that global health is highly interdisci
plinary and multidisciplinary across the health professions and extends to other dis-
ciplines and the unique and overlapping contributions that may occur. This aspect
of global health further extends the scope and impact of the work from domestic
health issues to crossing borders and continents, the distribution and competencies
of health professionals, and capacity building and policy issues that are fundamen-
tal to the health of the world’s people. Koplan and colleagues’ definition of global
health, as described previously, encompasses the knowledge, resources, and impact
of societies in addressing health challenges. They note that global health engages
in transnational solutions and engages many disciplines in promoting the goals of
health. The profession of nursing, as the largest number of global health profession-
als worldwide, has a critical contribution to offer in global health.
The World Health Organization (WHO, 1946) defines health as “a state of com-
plete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease
1: Global Health and Global Nursing • 7
or infirmity” (p. 100). This definition is universally accepted as the gold standard
for health worldwide. Nurses and other health professionals play a key role in
addressing the health of those living in our global village. There is both a profes-
sional duty as well as an ethical obligation for the nursing profession to advance
this enduring vision of health for the world’s people.
One of the most significant events that launched the focus on global health
and subsequently global medicine and global nursing efforts was the Alma Ata
conference. This conference was held in 1978 at the International Conference on
Primary Health Care at Alma Ata, Kazakhstan, and was cosponsored by WHO
and the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). A major achievement of the
conference was the adoption of a resolution, the Declaration of Alma-Ata (WHO,
1978), aimed at attaining Health for All by the Year 2000; subsequently, Health
for All in the 21st Century (Health 21) was developed.
The U.S. Healthy People 2020 objectives are the U.S.-specific recommendations
that address the important health goals similar to the goals of HFA 21. In 1990, the
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services offered the first version of Healthy
People 2000, with subsequent recommendations offered in 2010 and 2020. These
reports address health promotion, health protection, and preventive services. The
goals of Healthy People 2020 are shown in Figure 1.1.
FIGURE 1.1 Vision, mission, and goals of Healthy People 2020. (continued )
notes, “The shocking fact is that, according to the 1996 United Nations Human
Development Report (1996), 358 people have more wealth than the combined
incomes of 45% of the world population (i.e., 358 rich people own more than
2.3 billion poor people)” (p. 7). The trend that a very small number of people own the
majority of the world’s wealth continues today. Poverty is directly associated with
10 • Unit I: Foundations of Global Nursing
FIGURE 1.1 Vision, mission, and goals of Healthy People 2020. (continued )
1: Global Health and Global Nursing • 11
poorer health outcomes. The resulting myriad acute and chronic health problems
are frequently addressed in wealthier countries—although less effectively for the
poor. However, poorer communities continue to struggle. Also, many of these com-
municable and chronic diseases such as measles, mumps, rubella, polio, severe acute
respiratory syndrome (SARS), H1N1, and hepatitis, as well as HIV and malaria, are
endemic in poorer countries.
Austin (2001) also discusses the shift of the nursing profession toward global
engagement, as well as societal actions and the role of organizations, both nursing
and world health organizations. Perhaps the most powerful question that she poses
is the following: “Should we be tinkering with genes when, for many parts of the
world, the most acute biotechnological problem is a safe water supply?” (p. 7). There
are numerous issues that affect the health of the world’s people and are global man-
dates for the nursing profession to address. These include lack of access to water,
emerging infectious diseases, chronic illnesses, lack of access to natural resources,
war and conflict, and climate change. As Nelson (2011) suggests: “Climate change
poses challenges on a new scale for humanity, particularly for the populations of
lower income countries” (p. vi). Further, women, children, and the elderly are noted
to have unique vulnerabilities with respect to climate change—particularly related to
“existing power inequalities and social norms, [thus] the impacts of climate change
will not be felt evenly, but will be overlaid onto existing patterns of vulnerability
within rural and urban populations and communities—and may make patterns of
inequality more pronounced” (Nelson, 2011, p. vii).
Upvall, Leffers, and Mitchell (2014) address the intersection of international
health, public health, and global nursing and define global nursing as “individual
and/or population-centered care addressing social determinants of health with
a spirit of cultural humility, deliberation, and reflection in true partnership with
communities and other health care providers” (p. 6). Their conceptual model for
partnership and sustainability for global nursing reflects the key components, the
partnering process, and goal of sustainability of interventions in global efforts.
Their model includes partner factors for global nurses and host partner nurses,
which enriches the global projects. Mutual goal setting, collaboration, empower-
ing, and capacity building are infused in the model since global nursing efforts
should be bidirectional rather than U.S. centric.
This section provides an overview of several global organizations that influence the
health of the world’s people, including the United Nations (UN), WHO, the World
Bank, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) in the United States, and
nursing organizations such as the International Council of Nurses, which advances
the work of nursing and the health needs of our global population. Although not an
exhaustive review of the many organizations that contribute to global health, this
section offers an overview of the contributions of global health organizations.
12 • Unit I: Foundations of Global Nursing
Such a division, as Hoffman and Rottingen suggest, may strengthen WHO’s politi-
cal decision making and the organization’s ability to secure independent scien-
tific advice. The profession of nursing could benefit directly from this proposal if
WHO’s role in global nursing is strengthened and there is an emergence of strong
nursing leadership within the organization and in countries worldwide.
As a global organization, in 2000 the UN promulgated the Millennium
Development Goals (MDGs) in response to the 21st-century needs of the world’s
population. These goals look to address eight important health and development
goals that aim to be achieved by 2020. The eight goals are
Table 1.1 Examples of Millennium Development Goal (MDG) Programs in Global Locations
# Goal Target Example
1 Eradicate • Halve the proportion of Yemen: Since 2007, the World Food
extreme people whose income is less Programme’s Food for Girls’ Education
poverty and than $1/day Program gives wheat and vegetable oil to
hunger • Full employment and families who send their girls to school.
decent work for all
• Halve the proportion of
people suffering from
hunger
4 Reduce child • Reduce the under-5 Nigeria: Saving One Million Lives
mortality mortality rate by two thirds campaign, launched by the Nigerian
government in 2012, expands access to
health services by providing bed nets,
supplying equipment to reduce mother–
child HIV transmission, and providing
health workers with telephones.
5 Improve • Reduce maternal mortality India: UNICEF and its partners are working
maternal ratio by three fourths to provide conditional cash transfers to
health • Universal access to women who deliver in health facilities to
reproductive health encourage them to access appropriate
medical care at time of delivery.
(continued )
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.