Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Preface xxv
Ashish S. Shah
DuyKhanh P. Ceppa and Betty C. Tong Jarrod D. Predina and Sunil Singhal
vii
viii Contents
35. Mitral Valve Replacement 551 51. Mechanical Circulatory Support 797
Stephen f. Huddleston and David D. Yuh Clinton D. Kemp and John V Conte
36. Mitral Valve Repair for Degenerative Disease 561 52. Surgical Ventricular Remodeling 835
Gurjyot Bajwa, Tomislav Mihaijevic, and A. Marc Gillinov Clinton D. Kemp and John V Conte
37. Tricuspid Valve Disease 571 53. Stem Cells for Cardiac Surgical Disease 849
David L. Joyce Peter V Johnston and Gary Gerstenblith
38. Surgical Treatment of Endocarditis 581 54. Minimally Invasive Cardiac Surgery 861
John R. Doty and William T. Caine D. Kalavrouziotis and Francois Dagenais
Contents ix
55. Cardiac Catheterization and Interventions 873 70. Pulmonary Stenosis and Pulmonary Atresia with
Todd A. Dorfman and Jon R. Resar Intact Ventricular Septum 1095
Cara L. Lawrence, Deborah f. Kozik, and Mark D. Plunkett
56. Echocardiography in Cardiac Surgery 893
Colleen Harrington, Samia Mora, and Katherine C. Wu 7 1. Double Outlet Right Ventricle 1113
Jess Thompson and Joseph A. Dearani
57. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging 921
fens Vogel-Claussen and David A. Bluemke 72. Truncus Arteriosus 1 127
Tara Karamlou, D. Michael McMullan, and Gordon A. Cohen
Malformations 955
75. Congenitally Corrected Transposition 1161
Robert H. Anderson and Andrew C. Cook
Emile A. Bacha
60. Perioperative Critical Care of the
76. Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome 1 17 1
Pediatric Cardiac Surgical Patient 973
Peter f. Gruber and Thomas L. Spray
Stacie B. Peddy, Marissa A. Brunetti, and J amie McElrath Schwartz
67. AortopulmonaryWindow 1063 Giorgio Zanotti, Duke E. Cameron, and Luca A. Vricella
xi
xii Contributors
Kenneth K. Liao, MD, PhD Kaushik Mandai, MD, MPH, MS, FESC, FRCS(CTh)
Associate Professor of Surgery, Surgical Director Heart Assistant Professor
Transplantation Division of Cardiac Surgery
Department of Surgery The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions
University of Minnesota Baltimore, Maryland
Minneapolis, Minnesota Chapter 6: Thoracic Infections
Chapter 50: Cardiac Transplantation Chapter 33: Aortic Root Replacement
Chapter 90: Management of Adults with Congenital Heart Disease
Jules Lin, MD
Assistant Professor of Surgery David Mason, MD
Department of Surgery Staff Surgeon
Section of Thoracic Surgery Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
University of Michigan Medical Center The Cleveland Clinic
Ann Arbor, Michigan Cleveland, Ohio
Chapter 16: Esophageal Cancer Chapter 21: Benign and Malignant Pleural Tumors
Pieter J.A. van der Starre, PhD Betty C. Tong, MD, MHS
Professor of Cardiovascular Anesthesiology Assistant Professor
Department of Anesthesiology Division of Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery
Stanford University School of medicine Department of Surgery
Stanford, California Duke University Medical Center
Chapter 39: Ascending and Arch Aneurysms of the Aorta Durham, Indiana
Chapter 10: Pulmonary Metastasis
Ibrahim Sultan, MD
Resident in Surgery Dario Troise, MD
Department of Surgery Staff Cardiac Surgeon
Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Pediatric Cardiac Surgery Unit
Baltimore, Maryland Giovanni XXIII Pediatric Hospital, University of Bari
Chapter 19: Congenital Chest Wall Anomalies Bari, Italy
Chapter 64: Atrial Septal Defects and Partial Anomalous Pulmonary
Thoralf M. Sundt III, MD Venous Connection
Edward D. Churchill Professor of Surgery
Chief, Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery Victor T. Tsang, MS, MSc, FRCS
Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School Chief of Surgery
Boston, Massachusetts Department of Cardiothoracic S urgery
Chapter 41: Aortic Dissection Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Trust
London, United Kingdom
Brad S. Sutton, MD, MBA Chapter 77: Tricuspid Atresia and the Functionally Single Ventricle
Assistant Professor of Medicine and Business
Department of Medicine Ross Ungerleider, MD, MBA
University of Louisville S chool of Medicine Professor of Surgery
Louisville, Kentucky Pediatric Cardiovascular S urgery
Chapter 44: Pacemaker and Defi brillator Therapy in Cardiac Brenner Children's Hospital
Surgery Patients Wake Forest University School of Medicine
Winston-Salem, North Carolina
Chapter 61: Cardiopulmonary Bypass in the Pediatric Patient
xxii Contributors
Paradoxically, our information age has fl ooded us with an over sketches of operations drawn on dinnertime napkins
unprecedented volume of medical information (the pro and who earn deep satisfaction from warning each other
verbial "drinking from a firehose"), yet clarity and wisdom about pitfalls and unseen hazards of procedures and practice.
still seem as rare as a desert oasis. Th is long-awaited second David Yuh and his co-editors Luca Vricella, S teve Yang, and
edition of the Johns Hopkins Textbook of Cardiothoracic John Doty deserve rich praise for shepherding this effort to
Surgery is an arrival welcomed by all surgeons in our spe collect so much wisdom within a single cover.
cialty, from the novice to the seasoned, who are thirsty Finally, although it may seem odd that a Hopkins book
for the insight and perspective vested in each chapter. The is edited by a Yale surgeon, straddling of t hese two great
subtle title change from "manual" to "textbook" belies institutions by prominent physician educators has pre
the substantial additions and enhancements that mark the cedence in Halsted, Welch, Cushing, Gott, and Reitz, to
second edition, including new chapters and authors, key name j ust a few. Indeed, three of the four cardiac chiefs at
concepts, color accenting, and expanded bibliographies. Hopkins since Blalock were Yale graduates. J ohns Hopkins
This work takes its place as one of the most comprehensive and Yale have many similar a ttributes, not the least of which
yet readable books on the subj ect and is the best example is a deep tradition and commitment to medical education
I know to support the argument that the printed textbook and the training of young physicians. We are remembered
is alive and well, and in great demand. best by the lives we touch, those of our patients and our
Although born at Hopkins under Dr Yuh's leadership students.
while he was on our faculty, the project has grown to include
experts from many institutions, which parallels the collabor Duke E. Cameron, MD
ative and information-sharing spirit of our profession. This Cardiac Surgeon-in-Charge
is particularly so with cardiothoracic surgeons, who delight The Johns Hopkins Hospital
xxiii
This page intentionally left blank
PREFACE G
Much has changed since fi rst edition of the Johns Hopkins For example, we have included completely reworked chap
Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery was published in 2007. First, ters covering Primary Lung Tumors, Mitral Valve Repair, and
the tried and true Halstedian-based paradigm of cardiotho Mechanical Circulatory Support, as well as entirely new chap
racic surgical residency training as an 8- to 1 0-year appren ters covering Surgical Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac
ticeship has been challenged by new duty hour restrictions, Surgery in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease, a nd Stem Cell
intense scrutiny of clinical outcomes, and a s eemingly endless Therapies for Cardiovascular Disease.
parade of evidence-based quality measures and documentation As its title implies, most of the contributors to the Johns Hop
requirements. Whether one deems t hese changes as progress or kins Textbook of Cardiothoracic Surgery consist of current or
not, it is clear that they have affected the environment in which past faculty, residents, fellows, and students at The Johns Hop
today's residents must learn the craft of cardiothoracic surgery, kins Hospital. The fact that, in the course of our daily routines,
placing a premium on t he time during which they can develop we sometimes forget that many of our colleagues a re nationally
and reinforce their knowledge base from real-life clinical sce and internationally recognized experts in their respective fields
narios. Second, the advent of new integrated cardiothoracic owes to their humility and collegiality. Nevertheless, striving t o
surgical residency programs, taking trainees right out of medi produce the most authoritative t extbook possible, w e solicited
cal school, have made integrated, practical, and concise r efer many experts outside of the Hopkins community. We remain
ences with content readily accessible to uninitiated medical indebted to all of our contributors who generously donated their
graduates even more valuable. Finally, tremendous advances time and effort to make this a truly collaborative project.
in new technologies, including catheter-based valve delivery In addition to the contributing authors, we owe t hanks to
systems, less-invasive surgical techniques, new mechanical many other individuals. We greatly appreciate the patience
circulatory devices, a nd hybrid approaches in the treatment of and support of our editors and production staff at McGraw
cardiothoracic disease have added t o the already considerable Hill, in particular Christie Naglieri, Brian Belval, and Armen
knowledge base that cardiothoracic trainees must assimilate. Ovsepyan, as well as the staff at Electronic Publishing Services.
We have been gratified that the first edition of the Johns Hop We are equally indebted to Kimberly Behrens in t he Division
kins Manual of Cardiothoracic Surgery occupies a place among of Cardiac Surgery at Hopkins, who t ook on the onerous and
highly respected textbooks in our field and, in fact, serves as painstaking task of coordinating the many components of this
a sourcebook for the Thoracic Surgical Directors Association book along with reminding contributors and, yes, Editors to
web-based curriculum. The second edition of this textbook, keep on schedule. Also within the Division, Donna Riley, Diane
renamed the Johns Hopkins Textbook of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Alejo, Lori Garrison, and Genie Sessa provided invaluable sup
remains a comprehensive single-volume textbook covering top port and friendship. Finally, we wish to express our profound
ics in adult cardiac, congenital cardiac, a nd general thoracic sur respect and admiration for our colleagues and staff on the car
gery. It is intended as a core reference for all caregivers in the diac and general thoracic surgical services at The Johns Hopkins
field of cardiothoracic surgery. We again formatted the book to Hospital who, in addition to being the very best in their pro
facilitate review, prefacing most chapters with a " Key Concepts" fessions, are among the most giving and thoughtful individuals
section highlighting t he epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical that one could hope to work with.
features, diagnostic and treatment strategies, and outcomes for The sheer magnitude of work involved with assembling
each topic. Additionally, based on our own critique of t he first the fi rst edition gave us pause in considering embarking on
edition and thoughtful suggestions from its readers, we have a second edition. We hope t hat you, like us, are glad t hat we
made substantial improvements in t he new edition, including did. Finally, we all would like to express our profound love
colorized figures throughout the book, board-review questions and appreciation to our families who, rather than question
and answers, and a greater emphasis on decision-making fl ow our sanity, continued to support and encourage us in this
charts that are particularly useful in preparing for oral board undertaking.
examinations.
The content of this textbook reflects the rapidly changing David D. Yuh, MD, FACC, FACS
field of cardiothoracic surgery. In addition to the basic cur Luca A. Vricella, MD, FACS
riculum required for certifi cation, we endeavored to include Stephen C. Yang, MD
advanced concepts, controversial issues, and new technologies. John R. Doty, MD
XXV
This page intentionally left blank
GENERAL
THORACIC
SURGERY
This page intentionally left blank
Preoperative Evaluation
of the Thoracic Surgical Patient
Kelly K. Nagasawa
John R. Doty
KEY CONCEPTS
• Role of preoperative evaluation Zubrod score, DASI questionnaire, stair climbing, and
• The role of the preoperative evaluation is to ( 1 ) shuttle walk are all useful metrics.
•
determine the risk and morbidity associated with Pulmonary and cardiac testing
• Pulmonary function testing remains the cornerstone
the proposed operation and (2) identify any patient
conditions or factors that can be treated to mitigate the of preoperative evaluation. FEY " DLco, and
risk of morbidity and mortality. postoperative predicted values are important predictors
• History and physical examination of outcomes. Assessment of cardiovascular risk should
• The examination should focus on pulmonary and include noninvasive testing in patients with a history of
cardiac conditions, as these represent the most cardiac disease and more invasive testing as indicated.
•
common complications after thoracic surgery. Risk stratification models
• Functional and performance status • Mathematical models using the Epithor and Society
• The patient's ability to withstand and recover from a of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Database
major thoracic operation should be assessed prior to can provide reasonably accurate risk stratification for
surgery. Standard tests such as the Karnofsky score, patients undergoing major thoracic surgery.
3
4 Part I General Thoracic Surgery
especially for evidence of cachexia and generalized wasting. a simple "3-legged stool" of prethoracotomy respira
Cervical and supraclavicular lymphadenopathy can indicate tory assessment that provides a more robust foundation
metastatic disease. Cardiovascular examination should note for preoperative respiratory assessment. This algorithm
murmurs (valvular disease), arrhythmias (atrial fibrilla evaluates pulmonary function in three areas: respira
tion), and presence of peripheral edema (congestive heart tory mechanics (forced expiratory volume in 1 s [FEV 1 ] ) ,
failure) . Pulmonary examination should note respiratory parenchymal function (diffusing capacity for carbon
rate, use of accessory respiratory muscles, and presence of monoxide [DLco] ), and cardiopulmonary interaction
wheezing or rales. Abdominal examination can confirm the (Vo2max) .
presence of regional tenderness, organomegaly, masses, or In 2007, the American College of Chest Physicians
adenopathy. The extremities should be examined for equal stated that a patient may proceed directly to surgical resec
ity of pulses, cyanosis, or clubbing. Neurologic examination tion with no further pulmonary testing if the preoperative
should focus on motor strength and gait, both of which a re FEV1 is greater than 2 L for pneumonectomy candidates
important because deficits can affect postoperative mobili and greater than 1 . 5 L for lobectomy candidates. 9 In addi
zation and rehabilitation. tion to providing an estimate of operative risk, preoperative
values of FEV 1 and DLco can be used to calculate predicted
postoperative values for both FEV 1 (ppo-FEV ) and DLco
ASSESSMENT OF PERFORMANCE (ppo-DLco ), which are themselves predictors of operative
AND FUNCTIONAL STATUS risk. The ppo- FEV 1 can be calculated using the equation
of ppo-FEV 1 FEV 1 x (1 - [segments resected/ 1 9 ] / 100) . 10
=
tify risk factors for PLOS. The risk factors associated after high risk surgery. Chest 200 1 ; 120: 1 147- 1 1 5 1 .
7. Patterson GA. Cooper JD, Deslauriers ) , Lerut AEMR, Luketich
with PLOS have considerable overlap with the Kozower ]D, Rice TW. Pearson's Thoracic & Esophageal Surgery , 3rd ed.
models and include age, Zubrod score, male gender, ASA Philadelphia: Churchill, 2008:9- 18.
score, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, renal dysfunc 8. Slinger P and Darling G. Principles and Practice ofAnesthesiafor Thoracic
tion, induction therapy, and percentage predicted FEV • 1 7
Surgery. 201 1 : 1 1 -30. © Springer Science+ Business Media, LLC 20 1 1 .
1 9. Colice GL, Shafazand S , Griffin )P, e t al. Physiologic evaluation of
Table 1 - 1 summarizes these three risk stratification sys the patient with l ung cancer being considered for resectional surgery.
tems with their various risk factors. Chest 2007; 132:S161-S 1 77.
6 Part I General Thoracic Surgery
10. Wyser C, Stulz, Soler M, et al Prospective evaluation of an algorithm B. Patients with stable congestive heart failure do not
for the functional assessment of I ung resection candidates. Am J Resp
require additional testing.
Crit Care Med 1 999;159:1450-1456.
1 1 . Ferguson MK, Little L, Rizzo L, et al. Diffusing capacity predicts mor C. Cardiac catheterization is the initial screening modality.
bidity and mortality after pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc D. Diabetes is not a risk factor for cardiac complications.
Surg 1988;96:894-900. E. A patient that cannot climb more than two flights of
12. Rasheed SA and Govindan R. Preoperative evaluation of patients for
thoracic surgery. Top Tho rae Surg 2012; 1-18.
stairs should have formal cardiology evaluation.
13. Morice RC, Peters EJ, Ryan M B , et a!. Exercise testing in the evaluation
of patients at high risk for complications from lung resection. Chest
4. Which of the following is not associated with increased
1 992; 101 :356-36 1 . mortality in the Thoracoscore model?
1 4 . Bechard D , Wetstein L . Assessment o f exercise oxygen consump
A. ASA rating
tion as preoperative criterion for I ung resection. Ann Thorac Surg
1 987;44:344-349. B. Female gender
15. Falcoz PE, Conti M, Brouchet L, et a!. The Thoracic Surgery C. Malignant diagnosis
Scoring System (Thoracoscore): Risk model for in-hospital death in D. Performance status
15,183 patients requiring thoracic surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg
2007; 122:325-332. E. Age
16. Kozower BD, Sheng S, O'Brien SM, et a!. STS Database Risk Models:
Predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection. 5. Which of the following is not associated with increased
Ann Thorac Surg 2010;90:875-883. mortality in the STS-GTDB models?
17. Wright CD, Gaissert HA , Grab JD, O'Brien S M, Peterson ED, Allen MS.
Predictors of prolonged length o f stay after lobectomy for lung cancer:
A. ASA rating
A Society of Thoracic Surgeons General Thoracic Surgery Database B. Age
risk-adjustment model. Ann Thorac Surg 2008;85:1 857- 1865. C. Liver dysfunction
D. Zubrod score
E. Induction therapy
PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION OF
THE THORACIC SURGICAL PATIENT
BOARD REVIEW QUESTIONS
ANSWERS
(CHAPTER 1 )
1. Answer: D. The inability to perform 25 shuttles has
1 . Which of the following is correct regarding assessment
been correlated with a maximal oxygen uptake of less
of preoperative performance and functional status?
than 10 mL/kg/min and signifies prohibitive operative
A. A Karnofsky score of 10 percent is associated with a risk. A high Karnofsky score (80- 100%) or low Zubrod
low risk of death. score (0- 1 ) is associated with low mortality. A healthy
B. A Zubrod s core of 10 is considered normal risk. adult should be able to climb five flights of stairs. A drop
C. A healthy adult should be able to climb one flight in oxygen saturation of 4 percent or more during activ
of stairs. ity is considered significant.
D. Less than 25 shuttles is considered a p rohibitive oper
2. Answer: D. Maximal oxygen uptake (MVo 2 ) is the most
ative risk.
specific predictor of postoperative pulmonary com
E. A drop in oxygen saturation of 2 percent during
plications following pulmonary resection. It is accept
activity is significant.
able to proceed directly to surgical resection with no
2. Which is true regarding pulmonary function testing? further pulmonary testing if the preoperative FEV 1 is
greater than 2 L for pneumonectomy candidates and
A. If the p reoperative FEV 1 is greater than 1 L in a lobec
greater than 1 .5 L for lobectomy candidates. Patients
tomy candidate, no further testing is required.
with predicted postoperative FEV 1 or predicted postop
B. Predicted postoperative FEV 1 greater than 25 percent
erative DLco greater than 40 percent a re generally con
is a low-risk surgical patient.
sidered low-risk surgical patients. P atients with an MVo2
C. Predicted postoperative D Lco greater than 20 per
greater than 1 5 to 20 mL/kg/min are at low or "accept
cent is a low-risk surgical patient.
able" risk for postoperative morbidity or mortality.
D. MVo 2 is the most specific predictor of postopera
tive pulmonary complications following pulmonary 3. Answer: E. A patient that cannot climb more than two
resection. flights of stairs should have formal cardiology evalua
E. Patients with an MVo 2 greater than 15 to 20 mL/ tion. Cardiac complications are the second most com
kg/min are high risk for postoperative morbidity or mon cause of morbidity and mortality in t he thoracic
mortality. surgical patient. Patients with a history of a cardiac
condition, including congestive heart failure and dia
3. Which is correct regarding cardiac assessment of the betes, should also be referred for cardiology evaluation.
thoracic surgical patient? Noninvasive testing is the initial screening modality,
A. Cardiac complications are an uncommon cause of with cardiac catheterization reserved for appropriate
complications after surgery. indications.
Chapter 1 Preoperative Evaluation of the Thoracic Surgical Patient 7
4. Answer: B. Male, not female gender, is associated 5. Answer: C. Renal, not hepatic, dysfunction is associated
with increased mortality. The other risk factors in t he with increased mortality. Other r isk factors in the STS
Thoracoscore model are age, dyspnea score, ASA rating, GTDB models include age, Zubrod score, ASA rating,
priority of surgery, extent of surgery, malignant diag induction therapy, and FEV , .
nosis, composite comorbidity score, and performance
status.
This page intentionally left blank
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
DANCE ON STILTS AT THE GIRLS’ UNYAGO, NIUCHI
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.