Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GUIDE TO
THIRD EDITION
Acknowledgments
It is interesting to me how each edition of this book bring real-world knowledge and hands-on patient care
has its own uniqueness. I have worked at a different experience where I would only have been able to read
place during the writing of each edition, and I hope and write about what others do.
that has resulted in a deep layering of experience and There is a tremendous team of people at F. A. Davis
knowledge that makes each edition better. I certainly who have been part of this project. Even though he
feel like each job change has enhanced my professional retired before this edition was published, my dear friend
practice and has enriched me as a person. I have met Andy McPhee was the driving (cajoling? bullying?)
and worked with some extraordinary health-care force behind the third edition. I hope he is enjoying
providers, and I have had valuable contributions from his much-deserved retirement and getting to write
so many of them. what he wants, when he wants, if he wants. When
First, I would like to say thank you to my colleagues Andy approached me about a third edition, one of the
at Academic Urology and Urogynecology of Arizona. most anxiety-producing aspects of considering it was
I have had such encouragement and support from this who would be the developmental editor because I had
great group of people. I am grateful to have learned from less-than-wonderful experiences on the two previous
so many outstanding health-care providers throughout editions. I need not have worried at all, as I have had
my more than 27 years in medicine. I have benefitted the very good fortune to work with Stephanie Kelly,
from the expertise of Jamie Bair, NP (cardiology); developmental editor extraordinaire! Stephanie’s
Jennifer Nelson, PA-C (psychiatry); Steve Turner, knowledge of the process, her organizational skills,
RN (hospice); Dr. Richard Guthrie (palliative care); her sense of humor, and her hard work have made the
and several outstanding hospitalists who wished to journey so enjoyable, and she has my deepest gratitude.
remain nameless. I’m thankful for a group of dedicated I’m also grateful for the guidance of and contributions
Information Technology people who have helped me from Melissa Duffield, Senior Acquisitions Editor;
navigate electronic medical records and who’ve answered George Lang, Director of Content Development;
my questions with enthusiasm. Amelia Blevins, Developmental Editor for Digital
I must take this opportunity to acknowledge Products; Megan Suermann, Content Project Manager;
two incredible women who added so much to the Lori Bradshaw, Developmental Production Editor at
Document Library that we included in this edition S4Carlisle P ublishing; and Robert Butler, Production
of the book: Madison Palmer, MMS, PA-C, not only Manager. There’s probably not another publishing com-
contributed the prenatal records, but she also provided pany around that would have supported this project as
valuable assistance with content in the prenatal chapter. F. A. Davis has done, and I’m humbled and honored
Larissa J. Bech, MSN, RN, FNP-C contributed the they chose to champion this book.
pediatric records. Without their contributions, the
—Debbie Sullivan
prenatal and p ediatric visit notes would not exist. They
Appendices
Appendix A Document Library 309
Appendix B A Guide to Sexual History Taking 373
Appendix C I SMP’s List of Error-Prone Abbreviations, Symbols,
and Dose Designations 375
Bibliography 377
Index 387
Inscription 200
Subscription 200
Signa or sig 200
Indication 200
Refill Information 200
Generic Substitution 201
Warnings 201
Container Information 201
Signature 201
Writing Prescriptions for Controlled Medications 201
Common Errors in Prescription Writing 202
Electronic Prescribing 203
Federal Initiatives for Electronic Prescribing 204
Qualified Electronic Prescribing 204
Benefits of E-Prescribing 205
Barriers to E-Prescribing 206
Summary 206
Worksheets 207
Appendices
Appendix A Document Library 309
Appendix B A Guide to Sexual History Taking 373
Appendix C I SMP’s List of Error-Prone Abbreviations, Symbols,
and Dose Designations 375
Bibliography 377
Index 387
It’s no secret that medicine is constantly changing and chapters and to provide much more detail about the
evolving, but I guess I didn’t realize that there have been content. New content includes Chapter 4, Documenting
so many changes and evolutions in documentation until Prenatal Care and Perinatal Events, and Chapter 7,
I started working on the third edition. Since the second Older Adult Preventive Care Visits. Some chapters were
edition was published in 2011, there have been signif- relocated within the text to present a more chronological
icant changes in coding, billing, reimbursable services, sequence. Every chapter was revised; some revisions were
federal requirements for documentation, platforms for fairly minor, whereas others were extensive. Medicolegal
documentation, and so on. And, thanks to the feedback Alerts are included in each chapter to help highlight
from users of this text and thoughtful reviews by edu- important concepts. New to this edition are images of
cators and practitioners, the “wish list” of content for electronic medical record (EMR) entries, or screen shots.
this text has changed as well. So, here you have it, the There are multiple EMR systems available, so what is
third—and by far, the best—edition. One thing that presented may look different from what you’ve seen
has not changed is the basic principle of the book—this before, but I think it is helpful to see sample entries
is an instructional work on documentation and is not from different systems.
meant to be an instructional work on the practice of Sometimes Appendices don’t get a lot of attention,
medicine. Documentation and the practice of medicine but I hope you’ll check out Appendix A, the Document
are interrelated, and it is sometimes a challenge to keep Library. In the library, you’ll find documents that per-
them separate. However, they are two distinctly differ- tain to a particular patient grouped together in a way
ent practices. As an educator, I teach. As a Physician that captures the patient’s care chronologically. This
Assistant, I practice medicine. As an author, sometimes provides a different perspective than seeing them as
I want to do both, but that has never been the goal. “stand-alone” documents in multiple chapters.
The goal is to provide a solid foundation of principles Many educators mentioned that they would like the
of documentation that will preserve important aspects worksheet answers moved out of the book so that they
of the health-care provider–patient encounter while could be used more effectively as an educational tool,
meeting the requirements for reimbursement and other so this was done. You can find them in the Instructor’s
regulations. There are many examples of documenta- Guide, at DavisPlus on the F.A. Davis website, which
tion of various encounters throughout this book, and will allow you to provide them to the students as you
each is just one example of how an encounter may be see fit—you can simply provide the answers so students
documented. There is not just one way to document can check their own work, or you can use the worksheets
any encounter but many different ways; and different as graded assignments.
doesn’t mean “good” and “bad”—just different. I’m of Whether you are a student, a novice practitioner, or an
the opinion that the more examples you see, the more experienced provider, I hope this book will be a valuable
you will learn and the more prepared you will be when resource in your journey of professional development.
it comes time for you to document your way.
—Debbie Sullivan
Revisions started with the Table of Contents, which
Phoenix, Arizona
has been expanded to highlight sections within the
Chapter 1
Medicolegal Principles
of Documentation
LEARNING OUTCOMES
• Discuss medical and legal considerations of documentation.
• Identify groups of people who may access medical records.
• Identify general principles of documentation.
• Discuss medical coding and billing.
• Define the terms electronic medical records, meaningful use, and interoperability.
• Identify benefits of using electronic medical records.
• Identify challenges and barriers to using electronic medical records.
• Identify components of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act.
• Discuss principles of confidentiality.
patient does indeed have strep throat might be nice as record also serves other purposes and has audiences
well. If I prescribe a weak narcotic for a really nasty other than the patient and the health-care provider; it is
case of strep, the state medical board would be pleased both a medical and a legal document. The medical record
if I addressed what other medications have been tried establishes your credibility as a health-care provider. It
and whether the patient has any history of addiction. is important to remember that you are creating a record
I’ll also need to document that I explained the proper that other professionals will read; therefore, you should
use of the medications and the need for follow up if the use professional language and include appropriate
patient doesn’t get better. When I’m finally done with content. Other readers will assume, rightly or wrongly,
my note, it looks like this: that you practice medicine in much the same way that
you document. If your documentation is sloppy, full
CC: sore throat x 2d of errors, or incomplete, others will assume that is the
HPI: 17 y/o F with 2d h/o sore throat. Has an asso- way you practice. Conversely, thorough, legible, and
ciated headache and fever to 1018F. No significant complete documentation will infer that you provide
cough. Patient has noticed some swollen lumps in care in the same way, thus establishing your credibility.
neck. Having significant pain despite use of Tylenol, Some excellent providers simply do not have good doc-
ibuprofen and salt water gargles. umentation skills. However, this is the exception rather
Social Hx: no h/o substance abuse or addiction. than the rule. It is very difficult to persuade those who
ROS: denies neck stiffness or back pain, no rash. No read sloppy documentation that the person who wrote
difficulty speaking. that way can, and did, provide good care.
PE: VS: AF, VSS Up-to-date and complete documentation is an essential
Gen: alert, pleasant female in NAD component of quality patient care. The medical record
HEENT: NC/AT, PERRLA, EOMI, TM clear b/l, is the primary means of communication between mem-
OP notable for tonsillar enlargement with exudates. bers of the health-care team and facilitates continuity
No asymmetry or uvular deviation present. of care and communication among the professionals
Neck: + tender anterior cervical adenopathy, no nuchal involved in a patient’s care. Although many patients
rigidity or meningismus. will have a primary care provider who provides most of
CV: RRR S1/S2 without murmurs. their care, patients also may see specialists for specific
C/L: CTAB problems. Medical records are the vehicle for com-
Abd: soft, nondistended, nontender, no hepatosplenomegaly. munication among members of the health-care team,
McIsaac’s score = 4; Rapid strep + and the medical record is the common storehouse for
A: streptococcal pharyngitis all information about the patient’s care and condition
P: 1) Pen VK 500 mg po TID x 10 days. Discussed regardless of who is providing that care.
risks of medication including allergic reaction and
complications of not taking full course of antibiotics
including rheumatic fever and valvular heart disease.
2) hydrocodone elixir q HS to help relieve pain par- Legal Considerations
ticularly when trying to rest. Has already tried
acetaminophen and NSAID and will continue salt
of Documentation
water gargles. Follow up if no improvement in one As mentioned previously, all medical records are legal
week. Have discussed other potential diagnoses and documents and are important for both the health-
reviewed warning signs of retropharyngeal abscess care provider and the patient, regardless of where the
and meningitis. Patient agrees and understands plan. patient care takes place. The most important legal
functions of medical records are to provide evidence
Like I said, “pharyngitis >> penicillin.” that appropriate care was given and to document
(*Used with permission of the American Academy of the patient’s response to that care. An often-quoted
Family Physicians) principle of documentation, which every health-care
provider has probably heard, is that if it is not doc-
umented, it was not done. This is a fallacy because it
Medical Considerations is impossible to capture with documentation every
nuance of a patient–provider encounter, and it is im-
of Documentation possible to create a perfect record of every encounter.
However, the principle behind the quote is important
As illustrated in the example, the medical record serves in a legal context; there is a considerable time lapse
to document the details of the patient’s complaint and between when events occur (and are documented)
the medical evaluation and treatment. The medical and when litigation occurs. It may be anywhere from
2 to 7 years from the occurrence of an event until you Clear and concise documentation is required to receive
are called to give a sworn account of the event. The accurate and timely payment for furnished services.
medical record is usually the only detailed record of Peer-review organizations might read the record to
what actually occurred, and only what is written is determine whether the care reflected in your doc-
considered to have occurred. You will not remember umentation is consistent with the standard of care.
the details of an event that happened 6 years ago; your Researchers often obtain access to medical records for
only memory aid will be the medical record. As a legal purposes of conducting scientific studies. Although it
document, the medical record that you authored will be is important to remember that these audiences may
made available to plaintiff attorneys, defense attorneys, have access to your records, you should keep in mind
malpractice carriers, jurors, judges, and, most likely, that the primary audience of the medical records will
the patient. You should keep this in mind at all times be medical professionals involved in direct patient care.
when documenting. Throughout this book, you will analyze examples of
The record should be objective. Personal, subjective documentation. You may also complete the worksheets,
opinions regarding the patient, the patient’s family, or which will help you apply the information as you read
other providers do not belong in the medical record. It it. The purpose of this book is to teach documentation
is human nature to make value judgments about others, skills and critical analysis of medical records, not to
but it is asking for trouble to note in a record those instruct on the practice of medicine or to teach medical
irrelevant judgments about the patient. Document facts; decision-making. The content of a medical record—or
not opinions. All providers should strive for accuracy learning what to document—varies greatly, depending
in documentation. Correcting a medical record is not on the patient’s presenting problem or condition. The
only encouraged, but it is necessary in order to avoid principles of how to document and why documentation
potentially harmful mistakes or misrepresentations. is important do not vary as much and, thus, are the
Altering a record should never be done. Alteration con- focus throughout this book.
notes an improper change, concealment, or omission of
portions of records that were written inappropriately.
Correction implies the act of making something right. General Principles
Record alterations have rendered many defensible cases
indefensible. Most jurors will suspect that a provider of Documentation
who alters records has done so to cover up a mistake.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)
The opposing attorney will argue that alteration shows
is one agency of the U.S. Department of Health and
consciousness of guilt. Alterations in medical records
Human Services (HHS). As one of the nation’s largest
may give rise to a claim for punitive damages against a
payers for health-care services, CMS has established
provider. Intentionally altering or destroying a patient’s
specific guidelines for documentation that are referenced
chart is considered unprofessional conduct. Most states
several times throughout this book. There are two sets of
will consider a practitioner who alters or destroys a
documentation guidelines currently in use: the 1995 and
patient’s chart to have violated the applicable licensing
the 1997 guidelines. CMS published an evaluation and
statute and will sanction or suspend the practitioner’s
management guide in 2015; however, it was offered as a
license to practice medicine.
reference tool and did not replace the content found in
the 1995 and 1997 guidelines. There are minor differences
Other Purposes between the two guidelines, and it is recommended
that health-care providers refer to the guidelines to
of Documentation identify those differences. Additional information may
be found at www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/
Reviewers from various organizations can obtain Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNProducts/
access to a medical record for a variety of purposes. Downloads/eval-mgmt-serv-guide-ICN006764.pdf.
Health-care payers require reasonable documentation Both sets of guidelines recognize the following
for a number of reasons: general principles of documentation:
• To ensure that a service is consistent with the pa- 1. The medical record should be complete and
tient’s insurance coverage legible.
• To validate the site of service, medical necessity, 2. The documentation of each patient encounter
and appropriateness of the diagnostic and/or should include the following:
therapeutic services provided • Reason for the encounter and relevant history,
• To confirm that services furnished were accurately physical examination findings, and diagnostic
reported test results
• Assessment, clinical impression, or diagnosis systems create a “digital footprint” every time a record
• Plan for care is accessed. This digital footprint includes the date and
• Date and legible identity of the health-care time and the identity (typically name and title and/or
provider role) of the person accessing the record. The system
3. If not documented, the rationale for ordering also will indicate the time and date of any updates or
diagnostic and other ancillary services should be changes made to the record. You should never document
easily inferred. in a patient’s record in advance of seeing the patient. In
4. Past and present diagnoses should be accessible addition, you can correct or amend a patient’s medical
to the treating and consulting providers. record, but you should never alter it. At times, it will
5. Appropriate health risk factors should be be necessary to make corrections to a record. When
identified. making a correction in a paper record, you should draw
6. The patient’s progress, response to and changes a single line through the text that is erroneous, initial
in treatment, and revision of diagnoses should be and date the entry, and label it as an error. If there is
documented. room, you may enter the correct text in the same area
7. The diagnosis and treatment codes reported on of the note. You should not write in the margins of a
the health insurance claim form or billing state- page; if there is no room to enter the correct text, use
ment should be supported by the documentation an addendum to record the information. You should
in the medical records. (More discussion of bill- never obliterate an original note, nor should you use
ing and coding is included later in this chapter.) correction fluid or tape. In the EMR, once a document
is submitted, it is still possible to modify or correct
There are other generally accepted principles of the record. If an entire entry is incorrect (for exam-
documentation, such as that each entry should include ple, charting on the wrong patient), there is a process
the date and time the record was created and should to identify the entry as an erroneous document. The
identify the person creating the record. In settings in process will vary with different EMR systems, and
which care is provided around the clock, military time institutions will have their own policy for identifying
is often used to avoid confusion between a.m. and p.m. erroneous entries.
One o’clock in the afternoon is 1300, 10:30 at night is Based on your reading, complete the application
2230, and so forth. Electronic medical record (EMR) exercise that follows.
If using a ruled sheet such as an order sheet or not read” or “dictated but not reviewed” because doing
progress note, be sure that there are no blank lines. so will call attention to the fact that you did not verify
If a record is dictated and then transcribed, read the the content of the record.
transcription before signing it, correcting any errors in When entering the medical field, you must learn the
the process. You should not stamp a record “signed but language in order to function. Part of learning this language
is to learn the meaning of the abbreviations, acronyms, with a hyphen. The third category of CPT codes cor-
and symbols in use; therefore, they are incorporated in responds to emerging medical technology. There are
this text. Abbreviations are a convenience, a time saver, approximately 7,800 CPT codes, and the codes are
a space saver, and a way of avoiding the possibility of updated annually.
misspelled words. Incorporating abbreviations is not
an endorsement of their legitimacy, but it is intended Evaluation and Management Services
to assist individuals in reading and understanding When a patient presents for care, you as the health-care
medically related documents. Sometimes abbreviations provider evaluate the patient and then proceed to manage
are not understood. They can be misread or interpreted the presenting complaint. That encounter between you
incorrectly. For example, the abbreviation “CP” could and the patient may vary from brief to comprehen-
mean “chest pain” or “cerebral palsy.” Of course, the rest sive depending on the patient’s chief complaint. For
of the entry should make clear the term for which the example, the time required for evaluation of a child
abbreviation is being used. There are variations in how who presents with a sore throat is typically brief, and
an abbreviation can be expressed. “Anterior-posterior” the management options are fairly straightforward.
has been written as AP, A.P., A/P. Abbreviations may Conversely, more time is required for evaluating an
appear as all uppercase or all lowercase, and they may older adult who has several chronic conditions and a
or may not have periods after each letter (for example, new complaint of chest pain, and the evaluation and
PRN, prn, P.R.N., meaning “as needed”). Many inherent management process is more complex.
problems associated with abbreviations contribute to CPT codes assigned for E/M services are deter-
or cause errors. Health-care organizations should for- mined by several factors. One factor is whether the
mulate a “Do Not Use” list of dangerous abbreviations, patient is new, established, or seen for consultation
and you as the health-care provider are responsible for services, and another is the setting where care is
complying with your institution’s policies regarding provided. Complexity of service is another factor
use of abbreviations. and is determined by three key elements: history
(including history of present illness [HPI]; review of
systems [ROS]; and past medical, family, and social
Medical Coding and Billing history [PMFSH], which are explored in Chapter 2),
physical examination, and medical decision-making.
Concise documentation of the medical encounter is The complexity considers the presenting complaint,
critical to providing patients with quality care and to co-existing medical problems, amount of data to be
ensuring accurate and timely reimbursement. Medi- reviewed (i.e., tests and old records), amount of time
cal records are subject to review by payers to validate that you spend with the patient, number of diagnoses
that the services provided were medically necessary and treatment options, and risk for significant com-
and were consistent with the individual’s insurance plications. Table 1-1 summarizes the requirements for
coverage. Standard codes are assigned to reflect the each level of E/M based on history, physical exam-
health-care diagnosis, procedures, and medical ser- ination, and complexity of medical decision-making.
vices provided and to create a uniform vocabulary In the case where counseling and/or coordination
for claims processing, medical care review, medical of care constitutes more than 50% of the encounter,
education, and research. Two important code sets are time is considered the key or controlling factor to
the Current Procedure Terminology (CPT) and the qualify for a particular level of E/M services. This
International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. includes time spent with parties who have assumed
CPT codes are used to document many of the med- responsibility for the care of or decision-making for
ical procedures performed in a physician’s office. This the patient. If you elect to report the level of service
code set is published and maintained by the American based on counseling and/or coordination of care, then
Medical Association (AMA). CPT codes are five-digit you would document the total length of time of the
numeric codes that are divided into three categories. encounter, and you should describe in the record the
The first category is used most often, and it is divided counseling and/or activities performed to coordinate
into six ranges that correspond to six major medical care. Counseling includes discussion of diagnostic
fields: Evaluation and Management (E/M; discussed results, impressions, and/or recommended diagnostic
in more detail next), Anesthesia, Surgery, Radiology, studies; prognosis; risks and benefits of management
Pathology and Laboratory, and Medicine. The second options; instructions for management and/or follow-up;
category of CPT codes corresponds to performance importance of compliance with chosen management
measurement and, in some cases, laboratory or radiology (treatment) options; risk factor reduction; and patient
test results. Typically, these five-digit, alphanumeric and family education. An example of documentation
codes are added to the end of a Category I CPT code of time spent with a patient is shown in Example 1.1.
Table 1-1 Levels of Evaluation and Management Based on History, Physical Examination,
and Complexity of Medical Decision-Making
Level of History HPI ROS PMFSH
Problem focused Brief (one to three elements) None None
Expanded problem Brief (one to three elements) One system None
focused
Detailed Extended (four or more Two to nine systems One pertinent PMFSH (one
elements) from any of the three)
Comprehensive Extended (four or more 10 or more systems Complete PMFSH
elements)
Type of Physical
Examination Examination Description 1995 Guidelines 1997 Guidelines
Problem focused Limited to affected body area or One body area or organ One to five bulleted items
organ system system
Expanded problem Affected body area/organ system Two to seven body areas Six to 11 bulleted items
focused and other symptomatic or or organ systems
related organ system(s)
Detailed Affected body area/organ system Two to seven body areas 12 to 17 bulleted items for
and other symptomatic or or organ systems two or more systems
related organ system(s)
Comprehensive General multisystem Greater than eight body 18 or more for nine or
areas or organ systems more systems
Amount of Data Risk for Complications,
Medical Number of Treatment (Diagnostic Studies, Morbidity and/or
Decision-Making Options Prior Records) Mortality
Straightforward One or less One or less Minimal
Low Two Two Low
Moderate Three Three Moderate
High Four or more Four or more High
there is no medical term for “chest pain” when used as The primary code would be abdominal pain
a diagnosis, unless you know what is causing the chest (R10.10 if upper abdominal pain or R10.30 if
pain. When claims are submitted for payment, both CPT lower abdominal pain).
and ICD codes are provided, and your documentation 4. Secondary codes are listed after the primary code
must support the level of service billed. CPT codes work and expand on the primary code or define the
in tandem with ICD codes to create a full picture of need for a higher level of service.
the medical process for the payer; “this patient arrived • In the previous example, if the patient with
with these symptoms (as represented by ICD codes) abdominal pain has bloody vomitus, then
and these procedures were performed” (represented by hematemesis (K.92) would be coded as a
CPT codes). Downcoding is the process by which an secondary diagnosis.
insurance company reduces the value of a procedure or 5. Code a chronic condition as often as applicable
encounter and resulting reimbursement because either to the patient’s condition.
(1) there is a mismatch of CPT code and description, • Using example 3, the patient’s history of de-
or (2) the ICD code does not justify the procedure or pression may not be pertinent to the complaint
level of service. The quality and accuracy of the medical of abdominal pain, so it would not be coded;
record are vital to the reimbursement process, which, in however, diabetes would be coded.
turn, is vital to the delivery of health care. 6. Code co-existing conditions that may have an
influence on the outcome.
MEDICOLEGAL ALERT ! • In example 3, depression is a co-existing
condition that may alter a patient’s percep-
Although getting paid is a very important issue for tion of abdominal pain. The patient may take
health-care providers, you should never code for re- antidepressant medication, which could cause
imbursement purposes only. This can be construed as the pain. Coding both the chronic condition
fraud. Remember, your documentation must support the (diabetes) and co-existing condition (depres-
level of service and the diagnoses reported. sion) demonstrates the higher level of care
needed to manage the patient.
7. Do not use “rule out . . .” as a diagnosis.
Good documentation is absolutely essential to support • There is no code for this. Instead, use a
the level of E/M services and facilitate assignment of diagnosis, symptom, condition, or problem.
correct CPT and ICD codes. Here are some key con- You may use “rule out” when documenting the
cepts showing the interrelatedness of documentation assessment to guide you in your plan of care,
and codes and an illustrative example of each concept: although it is not necessary.
8. Signs and symptoms that are routinely associ-
1. Any tests ordered must correlate with an ICD
ated with a disease process should not be coded
code assigned to the visit.
separately.
• If a urine pregnancy test is performed, a rea-
• An upper respiratory infection (URI) is typ-
son for obtaining that test must be associated
ically associated with pharyngitis, rhinitis,
with a diagnosis, such as secondary amenor-
and cough. Pharyngitis, rhinitis, and cough
rhea (N91.1), menometrorrhagia (N92.0), or
each have a distinct ICD-10 code ( J02.9, J00,
abdominal pain (R10.10 if upper abdominal
and R05, respectively), but the code for URI
pain or R10.30 if lower abdominal pain).
( J06.9) is used because it encompasses these
2. Assign an ICD code that reflects the most
symptoms.
specific diagnosis that is known at the time. 9. When the same condition is described as both
• A patient’s diagnosis is gastroenteritis (K52.9). acute and chronic, code both and use the acute
If it is reasonably certain that it is viral, use the code first.
code for viral gastroenteritis, A08.4. Suppose • A patient may have an acute exacerbation
that the patient’s original complaint was di- ( J01.90) of chronic sinusitis ( J32.9).
arrhea (R19.7). The result of a stool culture is
positive for shigella. When the patient returns Accurate billing and coding is necessary to capture as
for a follow-up visit, then the diagnosis would much revenue as possible. The information presented
be enteritis, shigella (A03.9). here is meant to be illustrative in nature and is by no
3. The primary code should reflect the patient’s means adequate treatment of the subject and should not
chief complaint or the reason for the encounter. be relied on as authoritative. Many excellent resources
• A patient with a history of depression and are readily available to assist those who desire more
diabetes presents with acute abdominal pain. information on this topic.
Specific legislation and regulations exist that dictate such as patient records, cannot easily be shared across
the use of electronic prescribing. This is discussed in and sometimes within enterprises. There are signifi-
detail in Chapter 9. cant barriers to achieving interoperability. Incredibly,
there are over 1,000 EMR platforms on the market.
Barriers to Electronic Medical Records Most of these systems are highly proprietary and may
Many perceived barriers have hampered widespread not communicate well with each other. This lack of
implementation of EMRs. Although numerous studies interoperability presents a barrier to the transparent
have shown that most health-care providers believe that communication of health information, preventing
use of EMRs will improve quality of care, reduce errors, adequate coordination of care on the small scale and
improve quality of practice, and increase practice produc- obstructing population health management on a larger
tivity, there is resistance to adopting EMRs. A number scale. There is no standard technical language shared
of factors contribute to this, including well-publicized between systems; hence, there is little or no integra-
EMR failures; limited computer literacy on the part of tion with other applications, nor is there the ability
providers; concerns over security, productivity, patient of different systems to communicate in a meaningful
satisfaction, and unreliable technology; and the ab- way with one another. Information technologies were
sence of reputable research substantiating the benefits not initially designed with interoperability in mind, so
of EMR. Market and economic factors are a concern. rarely are structures in place to support it. Currently
Apart from the costs of hardware and software, there used data storage systems are often proprietary, and
is a tremendous cost in staff time and revenue when access to these systems is difficult. Implementation of
switching from paper to electronic charts. Ethical interoperable health information systems may require a
and legal issues abound with concerns about safety high degree of technical expertise not readily available
and security of systems and the ability to protect and to individual providers or smaller health-care organiza-
keep private confidential health information. There is tions. Standards of interoperability are only just being
even disagreement over who “owns” the data entered developed—after many health information technology
into any system as well as debate about accessibility to systems have already been installed and implemented.
the data. Technical matters, such as functionality, ease Meeting standards of operability will be an important
of use, and customer support from vendors are other criterion for the certification of EMR systems that are
barriers. It is challenging enough to find an EMR being developed at this time.
system that works for a single-provider ambulatory
care–based practice; it is another challenge altogether Meaningful Use
to find a system that will work for large institutions In February 2009, President Obama signed into law the
and serve the needs of diverse departments. Providers American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of
often complain that EMRs interfere with clinical 2009, which included more than $48 billion for health-care
care, making interactions more impersonal and less information technology for the adoption and effective use
face-to-face while also degrading clinical documentation. of EMR and for regional health information exchange.
Despite the huge investments that have been made in The Health Information Technology portion of ARRA
new technology, there are conflicting opinions about contains information related to the Health Information
the value of EMRs and whether or not they will truly Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act
help improve quality of care while decreasing costs. A (HITECH); the HITECH Act offers financial incen-
recent study by Medical Economics indicated that 67% tives for health-care providers and hospitals that comply
of physicians are displeased with their EMR systems. with the standards of “meaningful use.” To receive an
incentive payment, providers have to show that they are
Interoperability “meaningfully using” their certified EMR technology
Perhaps the biggest barrier to widespread adoption of by meeting certain measurement thresholds that range
EMR is lack of interoperability. A basic definition for from recording patient information as structured data to
interoperability is the ability of two or more systems or exchanging summary care records. The HITECH Act
their components to exchange information and to use imposes requirements for notification of a data breach
the information that has been exchanged. As it relates related to unauthorized uses and disclosures of “unsecured
specifically to EMRs, the Healthcare Information protected health information” (PHI). These notification
and Management Systems Society (HIMSS) defines requirements are similar to many data breach laws at
interoperability as “the ability of health information the state level related to personally identifiable financial
systems to work together within and across organizational information (e.g., banking and credit card data). Under
boundaries in order to advance the effective delivery of the HITECH Act, unsecured PHI essentially means
health care for individuals and communities.” Without “unencrypted PHI.” In general, the Act requires that
interoperability, fundamental data and information, patients be notified of any unsecured breach. If a breach
impacts 500 patients or more, then HHS also must be may be excluded for 18 months. If a person had health
notified. Notification will trigger posting the breaching insurance coverage before enrolling in a new health plan,
entity’s name on HHS’ website. Under certain conditions, the exclusion period may be reduced by the number
local media also will need to be notified. Furthermore, of months a person was insured, as long as there were
notification is triggered whether the unsecured breach no significant breaks of 63 or more days of coverage.
occurred externally or internally. Title I has additional important provisions. Pre-existing
conditions do not apply to pregnancy or to a child en-
rolled within 30 days of birth or adoption. Insurers are
Health Insurance Portability required to renew coverage to all groups regardless of
and Accountability Act the health status of any group member. Insurers may
not establish any rule that discriminates based on the
(HIPAA) health status of an individual or his or her dependent,
nor may they charge higher premiums or alter the level
Confidentiality of medical records has always been a of benefits. For those individuals with their own pri-
concern for health-care providers. Regardless of the vate health insurance plan, renewability is guaranteed.
medium of storage, confidentiality of data contained in Coverage cannot be terminated unless the premiums
the records will continue to be of utmost importance. are not paid, fraud is committed against an insurer, the
With the emphasis on interoperability and the criteria policy is terminated by the insured, the insured person
that define how EMR systems must be able to exchange moves outside the service area of a network plan, or the
confidential medical information securely, a discussion insurance is available only to members of that association
of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability and membership in the association is ended. If the insur-
Act (HIPAA, or the Act) is warranted. ance company stops selling the policy, it must offer the
Enacted by Congress in 1996 to address a number insured another policy it sells in the same state. Further
of issues affecting national health care, HIPAA is a details may be found at http://healthcare.findlaw.com/
large and complex law continually subject to revi- patient-rights/hipaa-the-health-insurance-portability-
sions and amendments by legislative actions. The Act and-accountability-act.html.
establishes standards, and timetables for adoption of
the standards, for electronic transfers of health data, Electronic Health-Care Transactions
addressing growing public concern about privacy and Prior to implementation of HIPAA, it was estimated
security of personal health data. The primary goals of that about 400 different formats were being used to
the standards are (1) to combat fraud and abuse; (2) to process health claims online. Billing and other adminis-
make health insurance more affordable and accessible; trative procedures were inconsistent and varied among
(3) to simplify administration of health insurance claims health insurers, the government, and other entities. This
by requiring all entities to bill electronically using one made it difficult for providers, hospitals, health plans,
format; (4) to give patients more control of and access and health-care clearinghouses to process claims and
to their health-care information; and (5) to protect perform other transactions electronically. In an effort
medical records and individually identifiable medical to lower costs and improve efficiency, standards were
information from unauthorized use or disclosure, es- developed to simplify the administration of health in-
pecially in the burgeoning electronic age. surance claims by requiring common formats adopted
as national standards under HIPAA. The standards
Health Insurance Portability require that the same format is used to transmit the
The Health Insurance Portability provision of the Act following health-related information:
(Title I) improves the portability and continuity of
• Claims and equivalent encounter information
health insurance coverage for workers and their families
• Claim status
when they change or lose their jobs by limiting the re-
• Payment and remittance advice
strictions that a group health plan can place on benefits
• Enrollment and disenrollment in a plan
pertaining to a pre-existing condition. A pre-existing
• Eligibility for a plan
condition is a condition for which medical advice, diag-
• Premium payment
nosis, care, or treatment was recommended or received
• Referral certification and authorization
within the 6 months before the enrollment date for a
• Coordination of benefits
new health insurance plan. Pre-existing conditions can
be excluded from health benefits for only 12 months.
A person who did not enroll during the initial or open The Privacy Rule
enrollment period is considered a late enrollee, and Providers have an ethical and legal obligation to safe-
benefits for late enrollees with pre-existing conditions guard patients’ privacy. Because of the requirements of
transmitting sensitive health information electronically, business associate, there must be an agreement that
the Privacy Rule was written to protect the confidenti- the PHI will be handled according to federal and state
ality of individually identifiable health information. The privacy laws. Additionally, a CE may disclose PHI as
rule limits the use and disclosure of certain individually required by law, such as reporting child abuse to state
identifiable health information; gives patients the right child welfare agencies. Treatment covers a wide array of
to access their medical records; restricts most disclosures patient-related activities, including providing health care,
of health information to the minimum needed for coordinating services, referring patients, and consulting
the intended purpose; and establishes safeguards and among providers. Communication between CEs may
restrictions regarding the use and disclosure of records take place using any method, including oral, written,
for certain public responsibilities such as public health, electronic mail, or facsimile, as long as “reasonable and
research, and law enforcement. Under the rule, improper appropriate safeguards” are used to protect the information.
uses or disclosures may be subject to criminal or civil Payment includes activities relating to financial aspects
sanctions prescribed in HIPAA. Federal HIPAA regu- of health care. PHI can be used for billing and claim
lations do not pre-empt any state laws that are stronger processing to obtain reimbursement and for utilization
or more protective of consumers’ security and privacy. review. Health-care operations include a wide range of
administrative and management activities in which CEs
Protected Health Information engage. These include case management and patient care,
and Covered Entities risk management, legal services, credentialing, quality
PHI relates to the past, present, or future physical or assessments and outcomes development, guidelines and
mental health or condition of an individual; the provision protocol development, and training students. Sensitive
of health care to an individual; past, present, or future PHI includes information about certain conditions or
payment for the provision of health care to an individual; their associated treatment, such as HIV status, substance
and information that identifies or could reasonably be abuse, or mental health conditions. Use of PHI refers to
used to identify a protected individual. This information internal use by the CE; disclosure refers to sharing of PHI
may be oral, electronic, paper, or any other form. Individ- for external purposes. Sensitive PHI may not be disclosed
ually identifiable health information includes such data without a patient’s written authorization, except in certain
as name, Social Security number, patient identification circumstances, such as to a consultant who needs this
number (such as a medical record number), address, information to assist in the patient’s health care.
demographic data, or any other information that could Consent Versus Authorization
reasonably allow a person to be identified.
The Privacy Rule applies only to covered entities Consent must be obtained from the patient at the first
(CEs) that transmit medical information electronically. visit before any services are provided. Patients must sign
There are three categories of CEs: (1) health-care pro- a consent form stating that they have been notified
viders, such as doctors, clinics, psychologists, dentists, of the practice’s privacy policy, which explains that
chiropractors, nursing homes, and pharmacies; (2) health the practice may use and disclose PHI for treatment,
plans, including health maintenance organizations payment, and health-care operations. Consent needs to
(HMOs), health insurance companies, and government be obtained only once and is valid until revoked by the
programs that pay for health care, such as Medicare, patient in writing. In an emergency situation, treatment
Medicaid, and the military and veterans’ health-care may be rendered without consent, but consent should
programs; and (3) clearinghouses that electronically be obtained as soon as possible afterward.
transmit medical information, such as billing, claims, For all other uses and disclosures, unless required
enrollment, or eligibility verification. by law, specific authorization must be obtained from
the patient detailing what PHI may be disclosed, to
whom it may be disclosed, and an expiration date. An
Use and Disclosure of Protected authorization is needed to release PHI to life insurance
Health Information companies and patients’ legal counsel. A CE may not
HIPAA has very prescriptive language for the use and give or sell patients’ names for commercial or marketing
disclosure of PHI. A CE may use or disclose PHI purposes. For example, a CE may not give or sell names
without patient authorization for purposes of treatment, of allergy sufferers to pharmaceutical companies that
payment, or its health-care operations. This includes dis- market allergy products.
closures to its agents or to another CE, such as another
health-care provider. Agents are business associates who Individual Rights
perform a function for the CE, such as dictation, legal Patients have the right to review and obtain a copy of
services, billing, and accounting, and are not subject their medical records, except in certain circumstances.
to the Privacy Rule. When a CE discloses PHI to a Exceptions to the rule are psychotherapy notes, information
compiled for lawsuits, and information that, in the opin- health-care provider judges it to be in the patient’s best
ion of the health-care provider, may cause harm to the interest and as long as the patient has not restricted the
patient or another individual. A reasonable, cost-based release of information to that person.
fee may be charged to cover expenses for copying and
postage. If a medical summary of the record is requested, Minors
the fee should be agreed on beforehand. Patients also The Privacy Rule defers to state or other applicable
have the right to request an amendment or correction laws that address the ability of a parent or guardian
if they feel the record is inaccurate or incomplete and to obtain health information about a minor child. In
may submit a written supplement to be included in their most cases, the parent represents the child and has the
record. If the health-care provider declines the request, authority to make health-care decisions about the child;
the provider must do so in writing and allow the patient however, the Privacy Rule specifies three circumstances
to submit a statement of disagreement for inclusion when certain minors may obtain specified health care
in the record. However, the health-care provider must without parental consent:
allow the patient to submit a correction to be placed in
• When state or other law does not require the
the medical record. The CE also may include its own
consent of a parent before a minor can obtain a
rebuttal. A health-care provider may require a patient
particular health-care service, and when the mi-
to come into the office during normal business hours
nor consents to the health-care service. Example:
to access and inspect the record. The provider also may
A state law provides an adolescent the right to
arrange to have someone present who can answer any
obtain mental health treatment without the con-
patient questions or concerns.
sent of the parent, and the adolescent agrees to
Patients have a right to an accounting of certain PHI
such treatment without the parent’s consent.
disclosures by a CE. The CE must be able to report who
• When a court determines, or other law autho-
the recipient was, when the disclosure was made, and
rizes, someone other than the parent to make
for what purpose the disclosure was made. The maximal
treatment decisions for a minor. Example: A court
accounting disclosure period is the 6 years preceding
may grant authority to an adult other than the
the request. Exceptions to this rule include disclosures
parent to make health-care decisions for the mi-
for treatment, payment, or health-care operations; to
nor, such as a stepparent or guardian.
the individual or their representative; pursuant to an
• When a parent agrees to a confidential relation-
authorization; and for national security purposes.
ship between the minor and the physician. Exam-
CEs must take reasonable steps to ensure the con-
ple: A physician asks the parent of a 16-year-old if
fidentiality of communications with the patient. The
the physician can talk with the child confidentially
record should demonstrate how the patient would
about a medical condition and the parent agrees.
prefer to be contacted regarding PHI, including test
results, appointment reminders, or discussions regarding Even in these circumstances, the Privacy Rule defers
his or her medical care. The patient may request to be to state or other laws that require, permit, or prohibit
contacted at an alternative address or telephone number. the CE to disclose to a parent, or provide the parent
A health-care provider may share relevant information access to, a minor child’s PHI. When the laws are un-
with family, friends, or caregivers involved in a patient’s clear, a licensed health-care professional may exercise
health care as long as the patient does not object and professional judgment on whether to provide or deny
the provider feels it is in the patient’s best interest. In- parental access.
formation may not be disclosed to a person not involved When a health-care provider reasonably believes
in the patient’s health care, if disclosure is judged to be that disclosure of PHI to the personal representative
inappropriate by the provider, or if the patient requests who is authorized to make health-care decisions for
nondisclosure. When disclosing PHI, only the minimal an individual may not be in the patient’s best interest,
information needed by that particular person should the provider may choose not to disclose, especially in
be disclosed; for example, a caregiver needs to know situations in which abuse, neglect, and endangerment are
which medications are to be taken, what activity and suspected. For example, if a physician reasonably believes
dietary instructions are prescribed, and what changes in that disclosing information about an incompetent older
condition to report. Details about the patient’s diagnosis individual to the individual’s personal representative
and prognosis may not be necessary and should not be would endanger the patient, the Privacy Rule permits
disclosed unless requested by the patient or the patient’s the physician to decline to make such disclosures.
personal representative. A family member or friend
who is not involved in the patient’s care may be told of Notice of Privacy Practices
the patient’s condition—stable, guarded, critical—but Covered entities are required to develop a privacy pro-
additional information may not be disclosed unless the gram detailing how their practice complies with the
I see increasing reason to believe that the view formed some time
back as to the origin of the Makonde bush is the correct one. I have
no doubt that it is not a natural product, but the result of human
occupation. Those parts of the high country where man—as a very
slight amount of practice enables the eye to perceive at once—has not
yet penetrated with axe and hoe, are still occupied by a splendid
timber forest quite able to sustain a comparison with our mixed
forests in Germany. But wherever man has once built his hut or tilled
his field, this horrible bush springs up. Every phase of this process
may be seen in the course of a couple of hours’ walk along the main
road. From the bush to right or left, one hears the sound of the axe—
not from one spot only, but from several directions at once. A few
steps further on, we can see what is taking place. The brush has been
cut down and piled up in heaps to the height of a yard or more,
between which the trunks of the large trees stand up like the last
pillars of a magnificent ruined building. These, too, present a
melancholy spectacle: the destructive Makonde have ringed them—
cut a broad strip of bark all round to ensure their dying off—and also
piled up pyramids of brush round them. Father and son, mother and
son-in-law, are chopping away perseveringly in the background—too
busy, almost, to look round at the white stranger, who usually excites
so much interest. If you pass by the same place a week later, the piles
of brushwood have disappeared and a thick layer of ashes has taken
the place of the green forest. The large trees stretch their
smouldering trunks and branches in dumb accusation to heaven—if
they have not already fallen and been more or less reduced to ashes,
perhaps only showing as a white stripe on the dark ground.
This work of destruction is carried out by the Makonde alike on the
virgin forest and on the bush which has sprung up on sites already
cultivated and deserted. In the second case they are saved the trouble
of burning the large trees, these being entirely absent in the
secondary bush.
After burning this piece of forest ground and loosening it with the
hoe, the native sows his corn and plants his vegetables. All over the
country, he goes in for bed-culture, which requires, and, in fact,
receives, the most careful attention. Weeds are nowhere tolerated in
the south of German East Africa. The crops may fail on the plains,
where droughts are frequent, but never on the plateau with its
abundant rains and heavy dews. Its fortunate inhabitants even have
the satisfaction of seeing the proud Wayao and Wamakua working
for them as labourers, driven by hunger to serve where they were
accustomed to rule.
But the light, sandy soil is soon exhausted, and would yield no
harvest the second year if cultivated twice running. This fact has
been familiar to the native for ages; consequently he provides in
time, and, while his crop is growing, prepares the next plot with axe
and firebrand. Next year he plants this with his various crops and
lets the first piece lie fallow. For a short time it remains waste and
desolate; then nature steps in to repair the destruction wrought by
man; a thousand new growths spring out of the exhausted soil, and
even the old stumps put forth fresh shoots. Next year the new growth
is up to one’s knees, and in a few years more it is that terrible,
impenetrable bush, which maintains its position till the black
occupier of the land has made the round of all the available sites and
come back to his starting point.
The Makonde are, body and soul, so to speak, one with this bush.
According to my Yao informants, indeed, their name means nothing
else but “bush people.” Their own tradition says that they have been
settled up here for a very long time, but to my surprise they laid great
stress on an original immigration. Their old homes were in the
south-east, near Mikindani and the mouth of the Rovuma, whence
their peaceful forefathers were driven by the continual raids of the
Sakalavas from Madagascar and the warlike Shirazis[47] of the coast,
to take refuge on the almost inaccessible plateau. I have studied
African ethnology for twenty years, but the fact that changes of
population in this apparently quiet and peaceable corner of the earth
could have been occasioned by outside enterprises taking place on
the high seas, was completely new to me. It is, no doubt, however,
correct.
The charming tribal legend of the Makonde—besides informing us
of other interesting matters—explains why they have to live in the
thickest of the bush and a long way from the edge of the plateau,
instead of making their permanent homes beside the purling brooks
and springs of the low country.
“The place where the tribe originated is Mahuta, on the southern
side of the plateau towards the Rovuma, where of old time there was
nothing but thick bush. Out of this bush came a man who never
washed himself or shaved his head, and who ate and drank but little.
He went out and made a human figure from the wood of a tree
growing in the open country, which he took home to his abode in the
bush and there set it upright. In the night this image came to life and
was a woman. The man and woman went down together to the
Rovuma to wash themselves. Here the woman gave birth to a still-
born child. They left that place and passed over the high land into the
valley of the Mbemkuru, where the woman had another child, which
was also born dead. Then they returned to the high bush country of
Mahuta, where the third child was born, which lived and grew up. In
course of time, the couple had many more children, and called
themselves Wamatanda. These were the ancestral stock of the
Makonde, also called Wamakonde,[48] i.e., aborigines. Their
forefather, the man from the bush, gave his children the command to
bury their dead upright, in memory of the mother of their race who
was cut out of wood and awoke to life when standing upright. He also
warned them against settling in the valleys and near large streams,
for sickness and death dwelt there. They were to make it a rule to
have their huts at least an hour’s walk from the nearest watering-
place; then their children would thrive and escape illness.”
The explanation of the name Makonde given by my informants is
somewhat different from that contained in the above legend, which I
extract from a little book (small, but packed with information), by
Pater Adams, entitled Lindi und sein Hinterland. Otherwise, my
results agree exactly with the statements of the legend. Washing?
Hapana—there is no such thing. Why should they do so? As it is, the
supply of water scarcely suffices for cooking and drinking; other
people do not wash, so why should the Makonde distinguish himself
by such needless eccentricity? As for shaving the head, the short,
woolly crop scarcely needs it,[49] so the second ancestral precept is
likewise easy enough to follow. Beyond this, however, there is
nothing ridiculous in the ancestor’s advice. I have obtained from
various local artists a fairly large number of figures carved in wood,
ranging from fifteen to twenty-three inches in height, and
representing women belonging to the great group of the Mavia,
Makonde, and Matambwe tribes. The carving is remarkably well
done and renders the female type with great accuracy, especially the
keloid ornamentation, to be described later on. As to the object and
meaning of their works the sculptors either could or (more probably)
would tell me nothing, and I was forced to content myself with the
scanty information vouchsafed by one man, who said that the figures
were merely intended to represent the nembo—the artificial
deformations of pelele, ear-discs, and keloids. The legend recorded
by Pater Adams places these figures in a new light. They must surely
be more than mere dolls; and we may even venture to assume that
they are—though the majority of present-day Makonde are probably
unaware of the fact—representations of the tribal ancestress.
The references in the legend to the descent from Mahuta to the
Rovuma, and to a journey across the highlands into the Mbekuru
valley, undoubtedly indicate the previous history of the tribe, the
travels of the ancestral pair typifying the migrations of their
descendants. The descent to the neighbouring Rovuma valley, with
its extraordinary fertility and great abundance of game, is intelligible
at a glance—but the crossing of the Lukuledi depression, the ascent
to the Rondo Plateau and the descent to the Mbemkuru, also lie
within the bounds of probability, for all these districts have exactly
the same character as the extreme south. Now, however, comes a
point of especial interest for our bacteriological age. The primitive
Makonde did not enjoy their lives in the marshy river-valleys.
Disease raged among them, and many died. It was only after they
had returned to their original home near Mahuta, that the health
conditions of these people improved. We are very apt to think of the
African as a stupid person whose ignorance of nature is only equalled
by his fear of it, and who looks on all mishaps as caused by evil
spirits and malignant natural powers. It is much more correct to
assume in this case that the people very early learnt to distinguish
districts infested with malaria from those where it is absent.
This knowledge is crystallized in the
ancestral warning against settling in the
valleys and near the great waters, the
dwelling-places of disease and death. At the
same time, for security against the hostile
Mavia south of the Rovuma, it was enacted
that every settlement must be not less than a
certain distance from the southern edge of the
plateau. Such in fact is their mode of life at the
present day. It is not such a bad one, and
certainly they are both safer and more
comfortable than the Makua, the recent
intruders from the south, who have made USUAL METHOD OF
good their footing on the western edge of the CLOSING HUT-DOOR
plateau, extending over a fairly wide belt of
country. Neither Makua nor Makonde show in their dwellings
anything of the size and comeliness of the Yao houses in the plain,
especially at Masasi, Chingulungulu and Zuza’s. Jumbe Chauro, a
Makonde hamlet not far from Newala, on the road to Mahuta, is the
most important settlement of the tribe I have yet seen, and has fairly
spacious huts. But how slovenly is their construction compared with
the palatial residences of the elephant-hunters living in the plain.
The roofs are still more untidy than in the general run of huts during
the dry season, the walls show here and there the scanty beginnings
or the lamentable remains of the mud plastering, and the interior is a
veritable dog-kennel; dirt, dust and disorder everywhere. A few huts
only show any attempt at division into rooms, and this consists
merely of very roughly-made bamboo partitions. In one point alone
have I noticed any indication of progress—in the method of fastening
the door. Houses all over the south are secured in a simple but
ingenious manner. The door consists of a set of stout pieces of wood
or bamboo, tied with bark-string to two cross-pieces, and moving in
two grooves round one of the door-posts, so as to open inwards. If
the owner wishes to leave home, he takes two logs as thick as a man’s
upper arm and about a yard long. One of these is placed obliquely
against the middle of the door from the inside, so as to form an angle
of from 60° to 75° with the ground. He then places the second piece
horizontally across the first, pressing it downward with all his might.
It is kept in place by two strong posts planted in the ground a few
inches inside the door. This fastening is absolutely safe, but of course
cannot be applied to both doors at once, otherwise how could the
owner leave or enter his house? I have not yet succeeded in finding
out how the back door is fastened.