Nicole Rapa

Task 2: Indoctrination and Brainwashing

Write Up:

The terms education, indoctrination, and socialisation can often be confused or used interchangeably
due to their close relationship with one another and because they all shape young minds. However,
these terms are distinct from each other; education aims to help students think independently, while
indoctrination imposes beliefs without strong evidence. On the other hand, socialisation introduces
individuals to societal norms without necessarily limiting critical thinking.

Bailey looks closely at indoctrination and tries to understand when it happens and how it differs from
education and socialisation. A compelling question that arises is whether there can be indoctrination
by default. The texts suggests that indoctrination can occur not only through explicit teaching but
also by omission. This ties to the curriculum and to whoever is in power as a curriculum’s selective
inclusion or exclusion of certain beliefs and positions can shape individuals’ perspectives, making it a
subtle form of indoctrination. This suggests that a critical examination of the materials presented in
educational settings and the potential impact of the information gaps on the development of young
minds.

Although the word indoctrination carries negative connotations and should be avoided at most
times, Bailey makes the argument that indoctrination for very young children may be necessary. This
is because young children may not fully comprehend the reasons behind moral, religious, or political
beliefs. However, this perspective raises the question of balance between providing adequate
guidance to young minds and undervaluing their inherent capacity to think independently. With
regards to moral implications, the text implies that indoctrination is generally considered immoral.
The reason lies in the difference between the goals of education and the inherent nature of
indoctrination. On one hand, education aims at cultivating open-mindedness and promoting critical
thinking, while indoctrination seeks to establish unwavering adherence to specific doctrines. When it
comes to socialisation and education, a delicate equilibrium is necessary. There needs a successful
integration of cultural norms and societal values without the suppression of individual autonomy and
the capacity to think independently. The challenge lies in creating a learning environment that
supports adherence to societal norms while at the same time empowering individuals to question
and form their own conclusions.

In conclusion, teaching is a journey where we guide students. Bailey's ideas make this journey
clearer, urging us to think about how we teach and the impact it has on students. Striking the right
balance will help young minds grow independently, ready to face the challenges of the world.