You are on page 1of 1

xii

4.11 Comparison of Bending Moment of Approach - I and Approach - II


at Section AA’ for dead load case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
4.12 Bending Moment profile of Approach - I at Section AA’ for dead
load case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
4.13 Comparison of Bending Moment profile of Approach - II at Section
AA’ for dead load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
4.14 Comparison of Bending Moment profile of Approach - I at Section
BB’ for dead load case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
4.15 Comparison of Bending Moment profile of Approach - II at Section
BB’ for dead load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
4.16 Bending Moment Profile of Approach - I at Section AA’ for lateral
load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
4.17 Bending Moment Profile of Approach - II at Section AA’ for lateral
load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
4.18 Bending Moment Profile of Approach - I at Section BB’ for lateral
load . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
4.19 Bending Moment Profile of Approach - II at Section BB’ . . . . . . 50
4.20 Comparison of Shear Force of Approach - I and Approach - II at
Section AA’ for dead load case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
4.21 Shear Force Profile of Approach - I at Section AA’ for dead load case 52
4.22 Shear Force Profile of Approach - II at Section AA’ for dead load
case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
4.23 Shear Force Profile of Approach - I at Section BB’ for dead load case 54
4.24 Shear Force Profile of Approach - II at Section BB’ for dead load case 55
4.25 Comparison of Shear Force Profile of Approach - I at Section AA’
for lateral load case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
4.26 Comparison of Shear Force Profile of Approach - II at Section AA’
for lateral load case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57
4.27 Comparison of Shear Force Profile of Approach - I at Section BB’
for lateral load case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
4.28 Comparison of Shear Force Profile of Approach - II at Section BB’
for lateral load case . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
4.29 Typical Elevation of case study building showing the axial forces in
superstructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
4.30 Typical Elevation of case study building showing the bending mo-
ments in superstructure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
4.31 Comparison of Results of Axial forces and Bending moments at
column base for exterior column line against gravity loads . . . . . 63
4.32 Comparison of Results of Axial forces and Bending moments at
column base for interior column line against gravity loads . . . . . . 65
4.33 Comparison of Results of Axial forces and Bending moments at
column base for interior column line against lateral loads . . . . . . 66
4.34 Comparison of Results of Axial forces and Bending moments at
column base for interior column line against lateral loads . . . . . . 67

You might also like