Unethical Requirement:

The practice of mandating five document uploads in exchange for just one free
document download on Scribd raises ethical concerns. This policy appears to exploit
users by imposing a disproportionate demand for engagement in comparison to the
benefit received. Such an approach may be perceived as taking advantage of users'
contributions without providing fair value in return.

User Engagement vs. Benefit Discrepancy:

Requiring users to upload five documents for a single free download creates a
significant imbalance in the user experience. This disproportionate demand for
user-generated content seems more geared towards bolstering Scribd's database
rather than fostering a fair and reciprocal relationship with its users. This can
be seen as a questionable practice, potentially impacting the perceived integrity
of the platform.

Negative Impact on User Trust:

Such a policy can have a detrimental effect on user trust and satisfaction. Users
may feel coerced into providing content they might not otherwise share, diminishing
the user experience and tarnishing the reputation of Scribd as a platform that
prioritizes user interests.

In the realm of ethical business practices, maintaining a fair and transparent

relationship with users is paramount. Policies that create a perceived imbalance in
value exchange could adversely impact Scribd's reputation and user loyalty. It's
essential for businesses to consider ethical implications when implementing such
practices to ensure a positive and mutually beneficial user experience.