The document discusses the Lump Sum Grant system and Service Quality Standards implemented in Hong Kong. The Lump Sum Grant system aims to increase accountability, efficiency, monitoring, and best practices through market-driven principles like cost recovery, competition, and flexibility. Service units are expected to meet Service Quality Standards which define management and service levels, and are based on principles of transparency, effective resource use, identifying user needs, and respecting user rights. While the Lump Sum Grant system intends to give non-governmental organizations more flexibility and discretion, concerns are raised that funding agreements may not be revised even if demand changes, and field staff are not involved in demand projections.
The document discusses the Lump Sum Grant system and Service Quality Standards implemented in Hong Kong. The Lump Sum Grant system aims to increase accountability, efficiency, monitoring, and best practices through market-driven principles like cost recovery, competition, and flexibility. Service units are expected to meet Service Quality Standards which define management and service levels, and are based on principles of transparency, effective resource use, identifying user needs, and respecting user rights. While the Lump Sum Grant system intends to give non-governmental organizations more flexibility and discretion, concerns are raised that funding agreements may not be revised even if demand changes, and field staff are not involved in demand projections.
The document discusses the Lump Sum Grant system and Service Quality Standards implemented in Hong Kong. The Lump Sum Grant system aims to increase accountability, efficiency, monitoring, and best practices through market-driven principles like cost recovery, competition, and flexibility. Service units are expected to meet Service Quality Standards which define management and service levels, and are based on principles of transparency, effective resource use, identifying user needs, and respecting user rights. While the Lump Sum Grant system intends to give non-governmental organizations more flexibility and discretion, concerns are raised that funding agreements may not be revised even if demand changes, and field staff are not involved in demand projections.
Lump Sum Grant and its impact Service Quality Standards
• Service Quality Standards (SQSs) define the level of which,
LSG Subvention System in terms of management and service provision, service units New managerialism are expected to attain. • Accountability • The SQSs are developed according to four principles which • Efficiency set out the core values of welfare services. These four • Monitoring principles are: • Best practice Provision of information (SQS 1 to 3) Market driven • make its mode of delivery transparent to the public; • Cost recovery to clearly define the purposes and objectives of the service • Competition • Flexibility Service management (SQS 4 to 9) • Incentive • tomanageresourceseffectivelywithflexibility,innovation and continuous quality improvement; Service Performance and Monitoring System (SPMS) • Funding Service Agreement (FSA) Service to users (SQS 10 to 11) • Service Quality Standard (SQS) • to identify and respond to specific service users’ needs;
Perceived benefits of LSG Respect to service users (SQS 12 – 16)
•NGOs could use the reserves on FSA activities and • to respect the rights of service users. related support services at their discretion •SWD’s financial audit process and transparency in allocation for new and basic LSG service units •Involvement of staff and users in agencies’ management and corporate governance of NGOs •Communication and conflict resolution channels
Funding and Service Agreement (Lump Sum Grant) (sample)
FSA and its impacts • FSA is an annual exercise • It seems like a common agreement but SWD would persuade the service unit to try first • Once it was committed, it would not likely be revised • Extra manpower would be given with extra demand • However, the demand was generated from the mind of the administrators who care about figures and accountability, and field staff was not being involved