Date: 19/12/2023

DAILY
CURRENT AFFAIRS
MERA MENTOR.IN

Post O ce Bill Passed: A Simplified

Overview
Introduction
Date: December 5, 2023
Location: Rajya Sabha, New Delhi
Subject: Post O ce Bill addressing services o ered by post o ces

Key Points
1. Purpose of the Post O ce Bill

Objective: Govern all services provided by post o ces.

Relevance: Replaces the 125-year-old Indian Post O ce Act, which primarily focused on
mail delivery.

2. Opposition Concerns

Contention: Various opposition members raised concerns.

Specific Points:
Opposition to clauses 9 and 10.
Granting post o cials power of interception.
Exemption from liability for intercepted items.
3. Minister's Perspective

Minister of Communications: Ashwini Vaishnaw.

Highlights:
Acknowledged opposition concerns.
Emphasized the transformation of post o ces into service-oriented entities.
Noted the increase in post o ces under the NDA government.

4. Concerns Raised by Opposition Members

Examples:
Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi expressed support for the Bill except for clauses on
surveillance.
AAP MP Raghav Chadha emphasized concerns about privacy invasion and vague
interception grounds.
BJD member Niranjan Bishi suggested empowering state governments for verification.

5. Supporting Views

Supportive MPs:
BJP MPs, including Dr Anil Bonde, highlighted the importance of interception for
security.
Dr Anil Bonde cited instances of security threats through the mail.

6. Minister's Response

Vaishnaw's Response:
Addressed concerns by emphasizing the need for interception for national security.
Compared interception provisions to constitutional rights with specific carve-outs.

Conclusion
The Rajya Sabha successfully passed the Post O ce Bill despite opposition concerns
regarding interception powers. The government's focus on modernizing post o ces to
provide diverse services was a key aspect of the discussion. While some members expressed
reservations, the Minister of Communications justified the interception provisions,
highlighting the importance of national security.

Exploring Allahabad High Court's

Decision on Mathura Idgah: Simplified
Overview
Introduction
 Date: December 15, 2023
Location: Allahabad High Court, Lucknow
Context: Decision on the Sri Krishna Janmabhoomi-Shahi Idgah Masjid dispute.

Key Points
1. Background of the Dispute

Location: Mathura.
Disputed Structure: Shahi Idgah Mosque.
Claim: Hindu petitioners argue it was built on Lord Krishna's birthplace.

2. Latest Application and Decision

Application Type: Filed under Order 26 Rule 9 CPC.

Request: Appointment of a commission to inspect the Shahi Idgah mosque.
Decision: Allahabad High Court allows the survey of the mosque complex.

3. Details of the Plea

Filed by: Eight people, including "next friend" of Bhagwan Shree Krishna Virajman.
Requests:
Survey of Shahi Idgah mosque.
Removal of constructions encroaching disputed land.
Handover of land to Shree Krishna Janmbhoomi Trust.

4. Historical Context and Claims

Mosque Construction: Ordered by Emperor Aurangzeb in 1670.

Petitioner's Claim:
Relies on historical events of Aurangzeb's rule.
Contests the legality of a compromise agreement in 1968.

5. Counterclaims by Muslim Side

Argument:
Plea lacks relevance to the original suit.
Shahi Idgah Mosque doesn't cover the disputed 13.37 acres.
Birthplace of Lord Krishna not beneath the mosque.

6. History of the Disputed Land

Pre-Mosque Era:
Area regarded as nazul land.
Earlier temple built in 1618 by Raja Veer Singh Bundela.
Post-Mosque Era:
Land transactions, auctions, and acquisitions by various individuals and trusts.

7. Legal Developments
 1968 Agreement:
Petition claims it was illegal and void.
Post-1968:
Formation of Shri Krishna Janmabhoomi Trust.
Various legal cases filed, consolidated by Allahabad High Court in May.

8. Comparison with Gyanvapi Order

Gyanvapi Mosque Case (Varanasi):

Similar dispute adjacent to Kashi Vishwanath temple.
Court-ordered scientific survey by Archaeological Survey of India (ASI).

9. Current Status

Mathura Case:
Allahabad High Court allows the survey.
Gyanvapi Case:
ASI survey findings awaited.

Conclusion
The Allahabad High Court's decision to allow the survey of the Shahi Idgah Mosque in
Mathura adds a new chapter to the long-standing dispute. The legal proceedings draw
parallels with the Gyanvapi Mosque case in Varanasi, reflecting the complexity of issues
involving historical and religious sites.

Understanding the House Impeachment

Inquiry into President Biden: A Simplified
Overview
Introduction
Date: December 14, 2023
Context: The House authorizes an impeachment inquiry into President Joe Biden.

Key Points
1. Impeachment Inquiry Authorization

Vote Result: 221-212 along party lines (Republicans in favor, Democrats opposed).
Purpose: To investigate potential "high crimes and misdemeanors," a constitutional basis
for impeachment.
2. President Biden's Response

Statement: Biden questions Republican priorities, accuses them of focusing on baseless

attacks.
Concerns: President highlights the lack of evidence supporting the inquiry's legitimacy.

3. Impeachment Process

E ect on Biden: Impeachment investigation extends into 2024, coinciding with the
presidential reelection.
Political Landscape: Potential matchup against former President Donald Trump, who
advocates swift impeachment.

4. House Speaker's Position

Pressure: Speaker Mike Johnson under pressure to show progress in the yearlong probe.
Leadership Statement: Emphasizes the evidentiary record but refrains from prejudging
the investigation's outcome.

5. Republican and Democratic Stances

Republicans: Unanimous support for the inquiry, emphasizing it as a procedural step, not
an immediate decision for impeachment.
Democrats: Unified opposition, labeling it a political stunt to retaliate against Trump's
impeachments.

6. Public Opinion

Republican Argument: Impeachment inquiry improves legal standing for information

requests.
Democrats' View: Insists the inquiry lacks credibility and legitimacy.

7. Hunter Biden's Role

Focus of Inquiry: Republicans concentrate on Hunter Biden's overseas business dealings.

Allegations: President accused of personally benefiting from Hunter's activities.
Additional Investigation: Whistleblower claims of interference in the Justice
Department's probe into Hunter Biden.

8. Legal Challenges

White House Response: Questions the inquiry's legal and constitutional basis.
Republican Perspective: Authorization strengthens their legal standing.

9. Hunter Biden's Legal Situation

Criminal Charges: Hunter Biden faces firearm and tax-related charges.

Democrats' Argument: Acknowledge Hunter's imperfections but stress he is a private
citizen being held accountable by the justice system.
10. Contempt of Congress Proceedings

GOP Action: Contempt proceedings against Hunter Biden initiated for not appearing.
Republican Comment: Accuse Hunter of getting into more trouble.

Conclusion
The House's decision to authorize an impeachment inquiry into President Biden marks a
significant political development. The process involves a thorough investigation into
potential misconduct, with a focus on Hunter Biden's activities. The contrasting views
between Republicans and Democrats underscore the ongoing political tensions surrounding
impeachment e orts.

Simplified Overview:
Telecommunications Bill, 2023
Introduction
Date: December 19, 2023
Context: The Telecommunications Bill, 2023, has been introduced in Parliament, aiming
for significant changes in the telecom sector.

Key Changes in the Bill

1. Structural Changes

Objective: Replace outdated laws (Indian Telegraph Act, Wireless Telegraphy Act,
Telegraph Wires Act) with modern regulations.
Reason: Adapt to the evolving telecom landscape, which has changed significantly in
recent years.

2. Licensing Regime Simplification

Current Scenario: Over 100 types of licenses, registrations, and permissions issued by
the telecom department.
Bill's Approach: Shift towards an authorization system to streamline the licensing
process.

3. Spectrum Assignment

Preferred Norm: Spectrum assignment through auctions.

Exceptions: Administrative allocation for specific sectors like metro rails, community
radio, defense, railways, and police.
Innovation: Opens doors for satellite broadband services' spectrum allocation.
4. Spectrum Management

Unused Spectrum: Government empowered to take back unutilized spectrum.

Sharing and Trading: Entities can share, trade, and lease spectrum.
Voluntary Surrender: Entities can surrender unused spectrum without government
payment.

5. Dispute Resolution

Mechanism: Introduces a tiered structure for settling disputes, involving an adjudicating

o cer, designated committee of appeals, and the Telecom Disputes Settlement and
Appellate Tribunal (TDSAT).

6. User Authentication

Measure: Mandates biometric authentication of users to curb fraud.

Concerns: Raises privacy concerns among users.

7. Government Powers

Interception and Disclosure: Allows interception, disclosure, and suspension powers

during a public emergency, interest, or safety.
National Security: Empowers the government to take control of telecom services and
networks in the interest of national security or during a war.

8. TRAI Chairperson Appointment

Requirement: Specifies eligibility criteria for the chairperson of the Telecom Regulatory
Authority of India (TRAI) to be appointed from the private sector.

9. Spectrum Allocation Debate

Background: Stemming from the 2012 SC ruling on the 2G case.

Outcome: Allows administrative allocation for satellite broadband services, aligning with
global norms.

10. Regulation of Internet Services

Definition: Defines telecommunication broadly but raises concerns about potential

regulation of online platforms.
Exemptions: Press messages exempted from interception, but concerns about defining
Internet-based communication platforms.

11. Industry and Civil Society Concerns

Broad Definition: Some fear the broad definition of telecommunication may allow
regulation of online platforms.
Consultation: Calls for further consultation and clarity on definitions.

12. Conclusion
 Impact: The Bill, if passed, will have far-reaching implications for the telecom sector,
aiming for modernization and adaptability in the evolving technological landscape.
Ongoing discussions and consultations will shape the final form of the legislation.

SOURCES: THE INDIAN EXPRESS, THE HINDU