You are on page 1of 63

Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Chapter 1-1
Introduction

1.1 Overview

Cement has been the basic building material and prime aspect in construction field. In order

to get required strength it has been used as stabilizing agent in certain proportions. This

property of cement has lead to the continuous production of cement at larger rate and this

has lead to expelling of co2 gas in larger proportions. This drawback has lead few attempts

to vary cement with similar material which can provide the strength and other properties

that cement provides and that would be economical, eco friendly.

Technology advancement has resulted slow growth in the field of Mud block masonry in

which the amount of cement is reduced and natural fibers has been included in smaller

proportions with cement and varying the soil content to assess the effect of dry strength and

durability of these blocks[1]. The properties of natural fibres that effect properties of block

are given in figure 1.1

Figure 1.1 Natural Fibre

Stabilized mud blocks are used as a building materials from ancient period. Today, earthen

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 1


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

architecture is correlated with low-cost housing and commonly seen in developed

countries. Continuous energy and cost fluctuations for some construction materials (cement

and ceramic bricks) and environmental concerns facilitate the use of renewable materials

such as earthen materials[2].

Mud blocks are the mixture of wetted soil, stabilizer and sand compacted together in a

compressing machine. There are two major types in fibres one is natural fibres and synthetic

fibres. In natural fiber two sources exist they are Flora-based, such as leaves, nuts, straw

wood and canes, other is animal-based, like sheep wool and chicken feathers.

Generally cement and soil mortar is used for manufacturing of these blocks. In present

work, we are attempting to study the effect of addition of treated Bagasse fiber in specific

proportions. The bagasse fiber is the dry pulpy fibrous residue that remains after crushing

of sugarcane fig1.2[3].

Figure 1.2 Bagasse Fibre

These fibers act as reinforcement material, in the same way as fibers in reinforced fiber

concrete, and prevents cracking upon drying by spreading the stress resulting from soil

shrinkages across the majority of the material with regard to dry compressive strength.
Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 2
Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

1.2 Literature review


The literature review is conducted on fibre reinforced mud block on it’s relative properties such

as physical, chemical, and mechanical properties and different types of fibres used.

1.2.1 Review on Natural fibres

Fibers that are formed by plants, animals, and geological processes are natural fibres. They can

be used as a part of composite materials where the properties are affected by the alignment of

fibres. Natural fibres may be matted into sheets and used to create paper or felt. For a long time,

fibres have been used in building materials. Natural and synthetic fibres have shown positive

outcomes in recent studies and investigations, as their existence has shown major advantages

in terms of the composite material's overall physical and mechanical properties. The use of

waste fibres in building materials will mitigate these challenges and facilitate environmentally

responsible and innovative solutions that operate in the field[4]. Few research explores the

forms, features and applications of various fibres used in a wide variety of building industry

materials. Fibres have a number of properties and can be used in a variety of shapes and sizes.

If the fibre is used then its form must be carefully considered and picked, since certain fibres,

such as glass, basalt, and recycled polyethylene terephthalate fibres, can degrade in alkaline

environments[5][6]. Natural fibres have a range of disadvantages and risks, including low

durability and deterioration over time. Studies have been undertaken to attempt to increase the

durability of the fibres, that includes of chemical preparation and chemical coating[7][8].

1.2.2 Review on Fibre reinforced mud blocks

The majority of buildings in rural areas are constructed of limestone, standard low-quality

concrete brick and adobe. But these, Materials do not have compressive strengths that are

strong enough. An earthquake-resistant material with a high degree of compressive strength

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 3


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

was sought after[9]. There are three basic techniques: earth block (adobe) masonry, rammed

earth and clom. An comprehensive compression and diagonal compression (shear) test

campaign was carried out in order to obtain better knowledge of structural behavior under static

loads. In the case of the earth, first compression findings showed brittle mechanical behavior

Masonry of the block (adobe), rammed earth and clom[10]. In order to obtain better knowledge

of structural behavior under static loads, a detailed compression and diagonal compression

(shear) test was conducted. In the case of the earth, brittle mechanical behavior was seen in the

first compression results[11]. The old approaches have been supplemented by new earth

building. Unfortunately, these techniques are often followed by excessive energy consumption

and deterioration of the environment. Experiments with multiple stabilizers found that only

certain quantities were successful and it was concluded that by using certain amounts of cement

and lime as stabilizers, conventional earth construction can be strengthened[1]. Soil

reinforcement is described as a technique for improving the soil's engineering features. It is an

old and ancient concept to use natural fibers to stabilize the soil in this manner. Consequently,

for the second time, randomly dispersed fiber-reinforced soils in geotechnical engineering have

recently drawn growing interest[12]. The use of natural fiber in soil blocks impacts mechanical

properties positively. Fiber-reinforced soil blocks have enhanced wear resistance and erosion

resistance. Those for binder stable blocks do not obey associations between properties. The

relevance of type of soil vs. type of fiber depends on the property [13].180 samples for the

regular proctor and UCS examination have been prepared and tested. Samples was tested for

7D, 14D, 28D, 56D and 90D cycles according to Indian norms. Results show improved soil

compressive strength using both fibers suggested[14][15].The Peak load, post-crack strength,

ductility are improved by addition of these fibre[16]. Ever since prehistoric times, natural fibres

have been used in maximize the elimination of shrinkage, earthen construction Cracking,

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 4


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

resistance to stress, resilience and tensile ductility[17][18]. Production of these stabilized

blocks doesn’t require any skilled labors and manufacturing of these blocks can be carried out

in three stages i.e soil preparation, mixing and compression, curing. Stabilizer plays important

role in manufacture of these blocks and formation of bonds between mixtures of soil stabilizers.

One of the key functions of the stabilizing medium is to reduce the soil's swelling properties

by creating a rigid soil mass structure, increasing its strength and resilience[19][20], Not all

soil types can be used for production, it has specific requirements, top layer and organic soils

aren’t suitable for production. But it is possible to select from several different varieties of soil,

with some expertise and experience, to create mud-stabilized bricks. In manufacturing good-

quality goods, it is important to recognize the properties of the soil[21][22]

1.2.3 Review on source and properties of bagasse fibre

Sugarcane bagasse is type of natural fiber that is the residue after the sugars have been

extracted. As being agro-industrial residue, sugarcane bagasse (Saccharum officinarum) is one

more source of lignin raw material. It is the by-product of sugarcane industry consisting of 32–

34% of cellulose, 19–24% hemicellulose, 25–32% lignin, 6–12% extractives. The chemical

structure of bagasse sugarcane is identical to that of the other walls of plant cells[23]. The

colossal cellulose content makes sugar cane bagasse a perfect composite reinforcement

material, various scientists have reported various chemical compositions for bagasse.

Sugarcane bagasse fibre’s crystallinity is 47 % and cellulose present in it shall be crystalline

structure[24][25]. Approximately 54 million tons of dry bagasse are produced annually

worldwide. From a period of long time, bagasse was used as fuel in some particular factories.

Nowadays, it is also used as a natural resource in the manufacture of pulp, paper products,

construction materials and biofuel[26]

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 5


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Chemical composition of sugarcane bagasse is similar to the other plant cell walls. Sugarcane

bagasse lignin has a higher proportion of H-type lignin, p-hydroxyphenyl, and hence a lower

methoxy content than softwood and hardwood lignins. Approximately 250–280 kg of bagasse

is generated from processing each ton of sugarcane which roughly yielded 54 million tons of

bagasse annually[27]. Currently, a large amount of bagasse is burnt as for energy recovery, and

only a limited quantity has been used to make pulps, board materials, and composites. It is

estimated that 200 million tons of lignin is produced annually from bagasse. The bagasse fibre

had a diameter of 0.3 mm to 3.1 mm range, length of 0.3 mm to 13.8 mm. Specific gravity of

bagasse fibre (Gf) was found to be 1.25-1.55 and its average tensile strength was 96.24-29.95

MPa. The obtained fibre was air dried at room temperature of 250C and had relative humidity

of 80%[28]. With expansive soil, when bagasse fiber is added it was observed to improve the

potential of compressive pressure and bearing With growing lime and bagasse fiber, swell

potential and compressibility decreased[28][29][30]. 20 percent cement substitution with

natural mineral admixture the hydration of cement was strengthened and 24.4 percent calcium

hydroxide was absorbed, creating a moderate natural reinforcing environment. The flexural

strength and strength of fiber-reinforced cement mortar has declined because of fiber

deterioration[31][32]. In cement matrix fibre overlapping creates a pathway for crack

development[33]. The properties of earth-based composites are greatly enhanced by bagasse

fibres and alkaline activators. Interactions between physical and chemical fibre-matrix

influence composite performance. Bagasse fibres improve flexural strength/density and

decrease the absorption of water. Micro fibres of pulp Polypropylene fibres convey composite

deflection-hardening behavior[34][35]. Few authors suggested combining bagasse fibers,

conglomerated by inorganic and organic binders such as ordinary Portland cement, plaster,

polymer resins (mainly polyurethane) and natural glues, to reinforce or produce plasterboards,

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 6


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

cement or polymer-based panels and bricks. For our analysis, these works on bagasse fibers

and their characterization were of notable importance[36][37]. Bagasse has been shown to have

a density of 1.28 g/cc and a density of 1.28 g/cc about 35% crystallinity index. The reported

tensile strength is in the 20-50 MPa range, with a 2.7 GPa tensile modulus. Like all other natural

cellulosic fibers, sugarcane bagasse has a natural hydrophilicity disadvantage, which tends to

draw moisture from the environment, resulting in swelling and loss of mechanical properties,

this deficiency of natural fibers to some extent can be minimized through modifying them by

subjecting them to different chemical treatments[38][39].

1.2.4 Review on different fibres used in fibre reinforced mud blocks

The addition of carpet waste fiber was found to increase the soil stiffness. Increasing the

carpet waste fiber content above the 0.2 percent did not have much impact on the maximum

strength, but significantly improved the residual strength[40] To evaluate the soil

stabilization efficiency of solid waste products reducing the issue of solid waste disposal in

an appropriate way. The modification of the index properties of soil combined with

industrial waste additives should be studied. To boost the process of soil stabilization in a

cost-effective manner. To monitor the risk of combining emissions with the

environment[41]. Physical-mechanical characteristics of compacted earth blocks formed

by a traditional silty clay clay from Portugal (as the mineral skeleton).Stabilized with a

natural cement activated by alkali, derived solely from waste[42]. The material behavior in

compression is analyzed, including time, stress, and shear strength gain. Parameters such

as tensile and shear fracture energy, which are often omitted from current experimental

work, are crucially assessed[43]. Investigation on tensile strength behavior of plastic-fiber-

reinforced soil. To study the possibility of utilization of waste plastics in soil masonry

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 7


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

blocks[42][19]. The effects on properties such as shrinkage, tensile and compressive

strength, duration of cracking, and failure. In contrast to unreinforced mud soil blocks, the

presence of fiber was examined[44]. Standard un stabilized adobe blocks and masonry

prisms have uniaxial compressive power and stress-strain behavior. The result shows that

the ratio of mortar strength to block strength determines the compressive strength, original

tangent module and Poisson's ratio of prism[45]. lime mortar (LM) as the cementious

matrix was investigated for the strengthening of lime masonry wallettes, which were

compared with the respective cement-based matrix. Diagonal, four-point bending, and

column uniaxial compression tests were performed to evaluate the shear, flexural, and axial

behavior[21][46]. Presentation of the development of a new lightweight block of masonry

using natural Geopolymer mortar based on pozzolana, hydrogen peroxide as a foaming

agent and jute fibers as reinforcement. Additive for the production of a modern lightweight

masonry block using natural geopolymer mortar based on pozzolana, hydrogen peroxide as

foaming agent, and jute fibers as reinforcing additive[47][16]. Stronger and more spatial,

they are stable relative to earlier styles of methods of earthen construction. Overall, the

addition of fibers increased efficiency in bending and ductility[48].

Various conditions impacting the estimation and calculation of the buffering potential were

investigated. On 18 samples, measurements of moisture buffering value (MBV) and steady

state properties (water vapor permeability and absorption) were performed to investigate

different conditions concerning the buffering capacity measurement and estimation[49]. It

reviews the physical-mechanical properties of sustainable building materials. Production

processes and the environmental effects of various materials are being researched. The

application offers strategies for the management of energy and natural resources[50].

Homogeneity of the microstructure within the specimens with pore size reduction.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 8


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Increased mechanical properties are primarily related to the non-propagation of fibre cracks

in the modified clay matrix due to its high tensile strength and adhesion to the clay matrix,

the effect of fibers on flexural strength was favorable[51]. The mechanical properties of 12

earth-blocked masonry wallets compression, compression of the diagonal and mixed shear-

compression tests[52]. Compared with conventional cement, geopolymers have a positive

environmental impact. The geopolymer microstructure depends on the source materials and

the parameters of the synthesis. Compared with conventional cement, geopolymers have a

positive environmental impact[53][54]. Analysis of water content, precise gravity analysis,

grain size analysis, overall dry density check, plastic cap and liquid limit analysis reveals

the sand clay is soil, In order to boost its sustainability, its low compressive strength must

be improved[42][55]. In the field of building, the stabilization of earth-based materials

continues to gain interest from researchers. The research concludes that soil-cement mortar

properties for building use are positively influenced by coconut fibres and lime[56][57].

Behavior as an earth stabilizer with seven natural polymers. The construction material

required a dry strength of 2 N/mm2 and a wet strength of 1 N/mm2 was achieved. Behavior

as an earth stabilizer with seven natural polymers. The construction material required a dry

strength of 2 N/mm2 and a wet strength of 1 N/mm2 was achieved[58]. Relationship among

bulk density, water absorption and porosity were established. Relationship was also

established between water absorption and thermal conductivity thermal conductivity was

also verified analytically by finite element[59][60]. Chemical stabilizer minimized the

absorption of water from bamboo particles in adobe. Through the use of chemical stabilizer

and bamboo particles, the shrinkage of Adobe was minimized[61][62]. For tests, water

absorption ranged from 8.7 percent - 11.3 percent, relative to clay bricks and concrete

bricks, values were favorable. The compressive power of compressed earth blocks has been

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 9


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

raised twice, For tests, water absorption ranged from 8.7 percent - 11.3 percent, relative to

clay bricks and concrete bricks, values[63] [20]. Cost analysis of production shows that

blocks with 10 %cement are about 55.7% cheaper than burnt brick[64][22]. By adding the

agro wastes and geopolymer, SMB strength was low compression strength and durability

of the blocks were increased by adding black cotton soil[65].

1.2.5 Review on chemical treatment of Bagasse fibres

One of the common techniques used for chemical treatment is using sodium hydroxide on raw

fibres. This helps to eliminate the contents of lignin and wax found in the fiber wall's outer

portion. There is ionization of the hydroxyl group of the alkoxides, which in turn tends to

dissolve components of low molecular weight. However, higher NaOH concentrations have

recorded excess delignification fibers that allows the fibers to get weaken[66]. This method

also helps in partially removing the content of cellulose and hemicellulose from the raw fibres.

This method ensures that general composition of the fibres doesn’t get affected and helps in

reduction of lignin and hemicellulose[37]. As a binding agent, silane reagents are used and are

stated to be efficient in reducing cellulosic hydroxyl groups at the interphase of the fiber matrix.

Due to its hydrolysable property, the Alkoxy group present can contribute to the formation of

silanols, which can further react with the hydroxyl groups present on the fiber surfaces, leading

to stable covalent bonds, helping to minimize hydrophilic nature of raw fibres[66][39].

The silane treatment shall be carried out in three stages acetylation, permanganate treatment,

peroxide and benzoylation treatment. The acetylation helps in increasing the flexural strength

and modulus and decrease the mechanical properties[67] Peroxide and benzoylation treatment

helps to better the fibre matrix linkage, increases strength of composites, reducing the water

absorption and improving the thermal stability of fibres[68]. By dissolving hemicellulose and

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 10


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

other impurities, acetone treatment of cellulosic fibers produces superior bonding with the

matrix, thus increasing the mechanical properties of the fibres[69] The soil used for building

should consist of 65% sand content and a 10% clay content. Soils with higher clay fractions

can be processed with inert materials such as sand, quarry dust, and mine waste to minimize

clay fractions[70]. Shrinkage and cracking have also been observed in soil blocks that have

been prepared. Because of their low strength, soil blocks are unsuitable for construction and

stabilization of soil blocks can be done with different additives like lime, fly ash, ground

granulated blast furnace slag, cement, metakaolin, bagasse to improve their certain

properties[71]. Soil stabilization is process of altering the physical properties of soil such as

strength, voids, water absorption and resistance and texture, if right method of stabilization is

used then compressive strength of soil can be improved till 400-500% along with increased

cohesion, minimum shrinkage, improvement in permeability, improved water resisting nature

and enhanced durability[72][73][74]

1.3 Literature summary

Studies on recent research indicated that soil stabilization is one of the ground improvement

techniques adopted to improve soil properties by the addition of extra ingredients. Interface

layers of fibrous materials can increase the compressive strength.

1.4 Literature Gap

From the literature review it was observed that stabilized mud blocks are made through

untreated bagasse fibres along with combination of lime and other natural fibres and were

found durable. But incase of only untreated bagasse fibre the mud blocks hasn’t got the

required properties and were not durable so this can be improved on treating bagasse fibre.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 11


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

1.5 Proposed Objectives

a) To characterize red soil to identify its suitability in stabilized mud block production.

b) To study the effects of the chemically treated Bagasse fibres on the properties of

compressed stabilized mud blocks.

c) To determine load carrying capacity of stabilized mud blocks using soft computing

tools.

d) To evaluate compressive strength of different type of walletes built using stabilized

mud blocks.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 12


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Chapter 2

Stabilized mud blocks

2.1 Stabilized mud blocks

The development of several alternative construction materials will be extremely beneficial

in reducing the impact of pollution on the environment. There are a few drawbacks, such

as loss of strength when saturated with water, erosion due to wind or driving rain, and poor

dimensional stability. In the process of minimizing the above mentioned drawbacks

stabilized mud blocks were invented and these had lesser drawbacks.

2.2 Equipment and methodology for the manufacture of stabilized mud

blocks

Stabilized mud blocks can be manufactured using a variety of equipment. For decades, the

blocks were made entirely of clay with the addition of some agro-waste, such as straw and

weeds. Few small houses have been built throughout the years utilizing these hand moulded

or basic timber moulded, un-stabilized and unburnt bricks/blocks.

The use of stabilizers such as lime, cement, gypsum, and fly ash coincided with the necessity

to apply some manual or mechanical pressure in order to obtain a higher density, reduced water

absorption, and higher compressive strength. Using hydraulic machinery to carry out the

stabilization stage has also reduced the amount of stabiliing compounds required, making the

blocks more cost effective to make, and has resulted in enhanced physical and mechanical

qualities in the completed products. During hot weather condition water is added in excess to

reduce shrinkage cracks on the blocks. Mixing the proportioned materials and soon moulding

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 13


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

process is carried out since cement may start hydrating process. Curing is done in two stages

primary curing will include covering blocks withplastic bags, grass etc to prevent the escape

of moisture. Later after two to four days depending on the local temperature, blocks are stacked

and weather cured for 14 days.

There are two types of presses for manufacture process

• Manual press

• Mechanical press

2.3 Manual press

This type of presses is light, solidly built, low cost, easy to manufacture and repair. Capacity

depends upon the way of work is classified the average production is 500 blocks/ day to 1200

blocks/ day. These presses are manufactured in countries like Belgium, Burkina Faso, USA,

Switzerland and other countries. Manual presses need pressure up to 2-10MN/m2 for the

production of blocks. In manual presses moulds canbe changed for changing frog dimensions

and block dimensions.

2.4 Mechanical press

This type of presses is heavy, more efficiency, productivity and less work. Hydraulic presses

have capacity of 300-800 blocks/ hour. This machine takes 10-20 metric tons of force for the

block surface. These presses run through diesel or electricity power. They are of 2 kinds

which are semi-automatic and fully automatic motorized presses. They deliver continuously

a homogenous moist and stabilizer suitable for SMB manufacturing

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 14


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Chapter 3

Materials and Methodology

The methodology for. Carrying out the experimental studies on the blocks such as

dimensionality test, compressive strength test, water absorption test. Determining the

compressive strength of the masonry wallet by compressive test and finally comparing the

results obtained.

3.1 Materials used in the present study

3.1.1 Red soil: Red soil forms in a humid, temperate, moist environment under deciduous or

mixed woodland, with thin organic and organic-mineral layers overlying a yellowish-brown

leached layer settling on an illuvium red layer. The majority of red soils are made up of

crystalline quartz. The figure 3.1 represents the collected sample of red soil.

Figure 3.1 Red soil

3.1.2 Bagasse fibres: The bagasse fiber is the dry pulpy fibrous residue that remains after

crushing of sugarcane. Sugarcane bagasse has a natural hydrophilicity disadvantage, which

tends to draw moisture from the environment, resulting in swelling and loss of mechanical

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 15


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

properties. The figure 3.2 represents the collected sample of bagasse fibre.

Figure 3.2 Bagasse fibre

3.2 Methodology

Methodology used in the present study is shown in fig 3.3

Materials
Test on materials Case study
characterization

Determination of characteization of
Refering to Journals
material properties experimental data

Comparision of
Compressive test
analytical results
on walletes using
with experimental
Ansys
results

Figure 3.3 Flowchart of research work

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 16


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

The detailed methodology consists of material collection and characterization of materials,

followed by performing basic tests on materials to assess their basic properties. Casting of

blocks with varying the fibre content and selecting the eminent block from the results obtained.

The masonry wallets are to be casted and then tested for compressive strength, comparison of

the results has to be done, but due to covid conditions the above mentioned methodology

couldn’t be carried out and adopted analytical approach. It includes of referring to quality

journals and obtaining relevant data required for analytical analysis, carrying out work through

Ansys software and comparing the results obtained with experimental results taken from

journals.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 17


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Chapter 4

Experimental and Analytical studies


Experimental work has been carried out to characterize the materials such as red soil, cement,

bagasse fibres.

4.1 Test on Materials

Various tests were performed to determine the properties of M-sand such as Specific Gravity,

Moisture Content and Grain Size Distribution as per IS-2386- part 1 (2016)[75].

4.1.1 Sieve analysis

The sieve analysis test was conducted to identify grain size distribution of Sand. The sieve

analysis was conducted on M-sand using sieve shaker in which different sized sieves are placed

in decreasing order of their sieve openings as shown in Figure 4.1. The test is conducted as per

IS 2386- part 1: 1963[75]. The results of sieve analysis are tabulated and are shown in Table

5.1. The graph showing distribution of particle sizes is shown in Figure 4.1. Based on the

cumulative percentage weight retained, the fine aggregate may be categorized as zone II

according to Indian Standard specification [IS383: 2016] [76].

4.1.2 Specific gravity

Specific gravity is defined as ratio of density of the material to that of the reference material

and the procedure followed as per IS: 2386- part 3 (2016)[77] . Aggregate absorption is

measured as the increase in dry sample weight when soaked in water for 24 hours. The specific

gravity in the present study is calculated by using the below equation.

Specific gravity =[W₂−W₁]/ [(W₄ −W₁) −(W₃−W₂)]

Were,

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 18


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

W1 = Weight of empty pycnometer (g)

W2 = Weight of pycnometer +1/3rd Volume of fine aggregate sample (g)

W3 = Weight of pycnometer +1/3rd Volume of fine aggregate sample + 2/3rd

volume of water (g)

W4 = Weight of pycnometer +Water (g)

4.2 Test on Red soil

In this study red soil has been used for mortar mix for construction of prisms. Various test such

as Liquid Limit, plastic limit and Specific gravity were performed as per IS 2720- part 5

(1985)[78].

4.2.1 Liquid Limit

The liquid limit is the moisture content at which the groove formed by a standard tool into the

sample of soil taken in the standard cup, closes for 12 mm on being given 25 blows in a

standard manner. At this limit, the soil possesses low shear strength. Apparatus used for the

experiment are Casagrande apparatus, Grooving Tool, Balance, Oven, Spatula and Squeeze

Bottle.

LL= [(W2-W3/(W3-W1)] x 100

LL= [(31.67-25.85)/ (25.85-13.26) * 100

LL= 46.227

Were,

W1= Weight of Cup (g)

W2= Weight of Cup + Wet Soil (g) W3=Weight of Cup + Dry Soil (g)

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 19


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

4.2.2 Plastic Limit

The Plastic Limit (PL) also known as the lower plastic limit, is the water content at which a soil

changes from the plastic state to a semisolid state. The Plastic limit test isperformed by repeated

rolling of an ellipsoidal-sized soil mass by hand on a non- porous surface.

LL= [(W2-W3/(W3-W1)] x 100

LL= [(14.40-13.51)/ (13.51-9.87) * 100

LL= 24.45

Were,

W1= Weight of Cup (g)

W2= Weight of Cup + Wet Soil (g) W3=Weight of Cup + Dry Soil (g)

4.3 Test on cement

Ordinary portland cement of Grade 53 has been used for the preparation of mortars, Various

tests were conducted to determine the properties of cement as per IS: 8112- 2013 [79]and IS

4031- part 5 [80].

4.3.1 Fineness test

Fineness modulus of cement is conducted as per IS:4031 Part 1-1996 [81]. Finenessof cement

has an impact on the hydration and strength gain and also heat generation. As cement becomes

finer the surface area for hydration increases and early strength development. Cement of 100

grams is sieved by standard IS Sieve No. 90 microns. Weigh the residue left on the sieve.

Fineness should not exceed 10% for ordinary cement. The fineness modulus of the cement was

found to be 6%.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 20


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

4.3.2 Standard consistency

The test was conducted as per the code IS: 4031:1988 [81]. The standard consistency as known

as normal consistency provides the amount of water required to produce cement paste. Vicat

apparatus is used with a plunger of 10mm diameter and 50mm length. Take 500 grams of

cement and prepare a paste with sufficient water. Fill the vicat mould and release the plunger

and record the depth of penetration. The amount ofwater required for plunger to penetrate up

to 33-35mm forms the standard consistencyand consistency of cement was found to be 31%.

4.3.4 Initial setting of cement

The test was conducted as per IS: 4031:1988 [81] and the water used for cement pasteof standard

consistency of 0.85P. The needle will penetrate into the block easily and later it starts

hardening. The time taken for the needle to penetrate the block for 33- 35mm depth is called

as initial setting time. The initial setting of cement was found to be 130 minutes.

4.3.5 Specific gravity

It is defined as the ratio between mass of cement to mass of equal volume of water both being

measured at same temperature. The test is conducted as per IS 2720 Part 3 1988[82] and blow

table 4.1 represents properties of cement.

Table 4.1 Properties of Cement

Properties of cement

Property
Observed values

Specific
gravity 3.15

Fineness
6%

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 21


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

The below table 4.2 represents properties of fine aggregates

Table 4.2 Properties of fine aggregate Soil


Properties of Fine aggregate

Experiment Result

Specific 2.65
gravity
Liquid limit 46

Plastic limit 25

Plasticity index 21

Water content 13.1%

4.4 Methodology for test on blocks


As per codal provisions basics tests will be carried out on blocks and cement mortar. Tests on

blocks such as dimensionality test, density test, initial rate of absorption and water absorption

test compressive strength and modulus of elasticity. Flow table test, compressive strength and

modulus of elasticity tests are conducted on a mortar.

Table 4.3 and 4.4 represents the required IS codal provisions for the tests on blocks and

mortars.

Table 4.3 Codal references for experiments on Blocks


Sl no Tests for Blocks Code references

1 Dimensionality IS: 1725:2013[83]

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 22


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

2 Initial rate of absorption IS 1077:1992[84]

3 water absorption IS 1725:2013 [83]

4 compressive strength IS 1725:2013[83] and

IS 3495:1992[85] (part 2)

5 Modulus of Elasticity IS 516:1959[86]

Table 4.4 Codal references for experiments on mortar


SI no Test Code book
1 Flow table test IS-5512 (1969)[87]

2 Compressive strength IS-2250 (1981)[88]

3 Modulus of elasticity IS 516:1959[86]

4.4.1 Dimensionality test [IS: 1725:2013[83]]

Twenty blocks shall be measured for its length, breadth and height with a scale graduation of

1mm length division the length measured shall be on longitudinal center line of each face,

Width across the top and bottom bearing surfaces at mid length. Height on both faces at mid

length.

As per IS:1725(part 1):2013, the maximum variation in the length of the blocks shall not be

more than ± 5 mm and width and height of the block shall not be more than ±3mm.

4.4.2 Water absorption [IS 1725:2013 [83]]

Three blocks are selected from each source and completely immersed in water for 24 hours,

Blocks are removed from water and allowed to drain then the visible surface water is

cleaned and weighed, Blocks are kept oven dry for 24 hours at temperature 100°c then these

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 23


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

shall be taken from oven and cooled to room temperature for which dry weight and

measurements has to be taken.

4.4.3 Compressive Strength [IS 1725:2013[83]]

Eight blocks to be selected out of twenty to carry compressive strength test to which

gypsum plaster capping has to be done on both sides to ensure uniform bearing surface.

The blocks are then placed in compressive testing machine between two steel plates of

thickness 12mm. Block and machine base are vertical and centrally aligned. Later, blocks

are subjected to compressive load at the rate of 2 N/mm2 per minute.

4.4.4 Flow table test [IS-5512 (1969)[87]]

Place about 25 mm thick layer of mortar mixed in accordance with 7.3.1 in the moulds and

tamp 20, times with the tamping rod. The tamping pressure shall be just sufficient to ensure

uniform filling of the moulds. Then fill the moulds with mortar and tamp-as specified for the

first, -layer. Cut off the excess mortar to a plane surface, flush with the top of the moulds by

drawing the, straight edge of a trowel (held nearly perpendicular to the moulds) with a sawing

motion across the top of the moulds. Wipe the table to clean and dry, particularly taking care

to remove any water from around the edge of the flow moulds. Lift the moulds away from the

mortar one minute after completion of the mixing operation. Immediately drop the table

through a height, of 12’5 mm, 25 times in 15 s. The flow is the resulting increase in average

base diameter of the mortar mass, measured on at least four diameters at approximately equi-

spaced intervals expressed as a percentage of the original base diameter.

4.5 Analytical approach – Introduction

Preliminary experimental works of the materials were finished in the current study and

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 24


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

experimental work was to be carried out and it included casting, curing and testing of mud

blocks and wallets.

Experimental work could not be carried out because of the COVID-19 epidemic. A systematic

review of the literature opened the way for selecting relevant parameters and collecting data,

which led the analytical method used to complete this research effort.

Ansys software is used for the analysis of walletes and nonlinear analysis method by using

material stress strain data and finding out the yield load and ultimate load carrying capacity of

the walletes.

4.6 Analysis of wall using Ansys

Wallete built from stabilized mud blocks was modelled in ansys and non linear analysis was

carried out.

4.6.1 Introduction to finite element method


The finite element method is a powerful tool to obtain the numerical solution of wide range of

engineering problem. The method is general enough to handle any complex shape or geometry,

for any material under different boundary and loading conditions. The generality of the finite

element method fits the analysis requirement of today’s complex engineering systems and

designs where closed form solutions of governing equilibrium equations are usually not

available. In addition, it is an efficient design tool by which designers can perform parametric

design studies by considering various design cases, (different shapes, materials, loads, etc.) and

analyze them to choose the optimum design. The method originated in the aerospace industry

as a tool to study stress in a complex airframe structures. It grows out of what was called the

matrix analysis method used in aircraft design. The method has gained increased popularity

among both researchers and practitioners. The basic concept of finite element method is that a

body or structure may be divided into small elements of finite dimensions called “finite

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 25


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

elements”. The original body or the structure is then considered, as an assemblage of these

elements connected at a finite number of joints called nodes or nodal points.

The step-by-step procedure for static structural problem can be stated as follows:

Step-1: Modelling

Modelling refers to the creation of the geometry of the object which is nothing but

computer compatible mathematical description. Mathematical model helps in displaying the

image of the object crated and manipulated on the graphical terminal by various software

commands executed through the CPU and input devices.

Step 2: Description of continuum (Structure).

The first step in the finite element method is to divide the structure of solution region in to

sub divisions or elements. Meshing is a pre-processing process that is done after the

modelling of the model, Meshing is one of the most critical processes in completing an

accurate FEA simulation. A mesh is made up of elements that contain nodes (coordinate

positions in space that vary depending on element type) that describe the geometry's form. An

FEA solver cannot readily cope with unusual forms, but it is considerably more at ease with

standard shapes such as cubes. The act of transforming irregular forms into more identifiable

volumes known as "elements" is known as meshing. Here in our case we have used

Hexahedral element meshing or “hex”, at lower element counts, hex or "brick" elements

produce more accurate results than tet elements.

Step 3: Selection of proper interpolation model

Since the displacement (field variable) solution of a complex structure under any

specified load conditions cannot be predicted exactly, we assume some suitable solution, within

an element to approximate the unknown solution. The assumed solution must be simple and it

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 26


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

should satisfy certain convergence requirements.

Step 4: Derivation of element stiffness matrix

From the assumed displacement model the stiffness matrix [K(e)] and the load vector

P(e) of element are to be derived by using either equilibrium conditions or a suitable Variation

principle.

Step 5: Assemblage of element equations to obtain the equilibrium equations.

Since the structure is composed of several finite elements, the individual element

stiffness matrices and load vectors are to be assembled in a suitable manner and the overall

equilibrium equation has to be formulated as [K]φ=P

Where K is assembled stiffness matrix, Φ vector of nodal displacement and P is vector of nodal

force.

Step-6: Enforcing the boundary conditions

The equations so generated cannot be solved unless boundary condition are substituted.

The geometry boundary conditions arise from the fact that displacement may be expressed at

the boundaries or effect of the body or structure.

Step 7: Solution of system equation to find nodal values of displacement

The overall equilibrium equations have to be modified to account for the boundary

conditions of the problem. After the incorporation of the boundary conditions, three

equilibrium equations can be expressed as [K]φ=P. For linear problems, the vector “φ” can

be solved very easily. But for non-linear problems, the solution has to be obtained in a

sequence of steps, each step involving the modification of the stiffness matrix [K] and “φ” or

the load vector P.

Step 8: Computation of element strains and stresses

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 27


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

From the known nodal displacements, if required, the element strains and stresses can be

computed by using the necessary equations of solid or structural mechanics. In the above steps,

the words indicated in brackets implement the general FEM step-by-step procedure.

4.7 Convergence requirement

The finite element method provides a numerical solution to a complex problem. It may

therefore be expected that the solution must converge to the exact formulation of the structure.

Hence as the mesh is made finer the solution should converge to the correct result and this

would be achieved if the following three conditions were satisfied by the assumed displacement

function. The displacement function must be continuous within the element. Choosing

polynomials for the displacement model can easily satisfy this condition. The displacement

function must be capable of representing rigid body displacement of the element. This is when

the nodes are given such displacement corresponding to a rigid body motion; the element

leads to zero nodal forces. The constant terms in the polynomials used for displacement models

would usually ensure this condition. The displacement function must be capable of representing

constant strain states within the element. The reason for the requirement can be understood if

we imagine the condition when the body or structure is divided in to smaller and smaller

elements. As these elements approach infinitesimal size the strain in each element also

approach constant strain states. For one, two and three-dimensional elasticity problems the

linear terms present in the polynomials satisfy the requirement. However, in constant curvature

instead of constant strains.

4.8 Advantages of FEM

The properties of each element are evaluated separately, so an obvious advantage is that we

can incorporate different material properties for each element. Thus almost any degree of non-

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 28


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

homogeneity can be included. There is no restriction on to the shape of medium; hence arbitrary

and irregular shapes cause no difficulty like all numerical approximations FEM is based on the

concept of description. Nevertheless, as either the variations or residual approach, the

technology recognizes the multidimensional continuous but also requires no separate

interpolation process to extend the approximate solution to every point with the continuum.

One of the important advantages of FEM is that it makes use of boundary conditions in the

form of assembled equations. This is relatively an easy process and requires no special

technology. Rather than requiring every trial solution to satisfy boundary conditions, one

prescribes the conditions after obtaining the algebraic equations for individual’s finite

elements.

4.9 Limitations in FEM:

FEM reached high level of development as solution technology; however the method yields

realistic results only if coefficient or material parameters that describe basic

phenomena are available. The most tedious aspects of use of FEM are basic process of

sub-dividing the continuum of generating error free input data for computer.

4.10 Applications of FEM

The finite element method was developed originally for the analysis of aircraft structures.

However, the general nature of its theory makes it applicable to wide variety of boundary value

problem in engineering. A boundary value problem is one in which a solution is sought in

domain or region of a body subject to the satisfaction of prescribed boundary conditions. Finite

element method is the best tool in investigation of aircraft structures involving static analysis

of wings, structures of rockets and missiles, dynamic analysis, response to random loads and

periodic loads. In mechanical design, stress concentration problems, stress analysis of pressure

vessels, dynamic analysis of mechanical linkages can be effectively dealt using finite element

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 29


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

method. The specific application of the finite element method in the three major categories of

boundary value problems, namely equilibrium of steady state or time independent problems,

Eigen value problems, and propagation or transient problems. In the equilibrium problems

steady state displacement or stress distribution is found for a solid mechanics problem,

temperature or heat flux distribution in the case of heat transfer problem. Referring to Eigen

value problems in solid mechanics or structural problem, natural frequencies, buckling loads

and mode shapes are found, stability of laminar flows is found if it is a fluid mechanics problem

and resonance characteristics are obtained if it is an electrical circuit problem, while for the

propagation or transient problem, the response of the body under time varying force is found

in the area of solid mechanics. Finite element method finds its application in the field of civil

engineering in carrying out the static analysis of trusses, frames and bridges. The dynamic

analysis of the structure is to obtain natural frequencies, modes and response of the structures

to periodic loads. Nuclear engineering also uses finite element method concept in the static and

dynamic characterization of its systems such as nuclear pressure vessels, containment structure

and dynamic response of reactor component containment structures. Even the Biomedical

engineering applies finite element method, for impact analysis of skulls. Finite element method

can be applied to analysis of excavation, underground openings and dynamic analysis of dam

reservoir systems, which come under Geo mechanics.

Finite element Method based upon discritization of component into Finite number of blocks

(elements), Finite element method (FEM) is a numerical technique for finding approximate

solutions to boundary value problems for partial differential equations. It uses subdivision of a

whole problem domain into simpler parts, called finite elements, and variational methods from

the calculus of variations to solve the problem by minimizing an associated error function.

Analogous to the idea that connecting many tiny straight lines can approximate a larger circle,

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 30


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

FEM encompasses methods for connecting many simple element equations over many small

subdomains, named finite elements, to approximate a more complex equation over a larger

domain.

4.11 Linear Static Analysis


It is the simplest and most commonly used type of analysis. The below figure 4.1 represents
the linear static approach.

Figure 4.1 Linear Static Approach

Linear means straight line. σ = €E is the equation of straight line (y = mx+c) passing through

origin. ‘E’, Young’s modulus is the slope of curve and is a constant. In real life, after passing

yield point material follows nonlinear curve but software follows same straight line.

Component break into two separate pieces after crossing ultimate stress but software based

analysis never show failure in this fashion. It shows single unbroken part only with red color

zone at the location of failure. Analyst has to conclude whether the component is safe or fail

by comparing maximum stress value with the yield or ultimate stress.

There are two conditions for static analysis:

• No variation of force with respect to time (Dead weight)

• Equilibrium condition - ∑ Force = 0 and ∑Moments = 0

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 31


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Hence, peak linear stress linear strain will be calculated by this method for dead frontal axle

under defined loading conditions.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 32


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Chapter 5

Results and Discussions

5.1 Results and Discussions

The input values were obtained from the experimental results refered from journal of B. V.

Venkatarama Reddy, Stabilized soil blocks for structural masonry in earth construction,

The factors like block dimensions, young’s modulus, poisons ratio, density, tangent modulus

and mortar proportions were taken from the model that gave optimum results.

Venkatarama Reddy and Jagadish (1989), Shrinivasa Rao et al. (1995), Walker (2004), Salih

(2018) shed some insight on the structural strength of cement stabilized mud block masonry.

Table 5.1 compiles the compressive strength (wet) of cement stabilized mud block masonry

prisms derived from the preceding research a variety mortar strengths and block strengths.

The table 5.1 provides experimental values of blocks required for analytical approach.

Table 5.1 Compressive strenght of blocks

Size (mm) Strength (MPa) Percentage and Type of fibre

230 x 190 x 100 3.2 (7%) Bagasse fibre[89]

305  143  100 4.65 (7%) Coir fibre[90]

305  143  100 5.34 (7%) Basalt fibre[90]

305  143  100 4.36 (7%) Kraft pulp[90]

305  143  100 4.23 (7%) Jute fibre[89]

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 33


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

6
5.34 y = -0.345x2 + 2.247x + 1.41
R² = 0.8225
5 4.65
4.36 4.23
Compressive Strength

4
3.2
3
Strength (MPa)

2 Poly. (Strength (MPa))

0
Block 1 Block 2 Block 3 Block 4 Block 5
Size (mm)

Figure 5.1 Graphical representation of compressive strenght of blocks

The above table 5.1 and figure 5.1 represents the compressive test result of blocks and

mechanical properties of blocks were investigated. Blocks having basalt fibres had higher

compressive strength compared with other blocks.

The below table 5.2 represents wallete sizes and compressive strength

Table 5.2 Wallete characteristics

Wallete characteristics

Size (m) Strength (MPa)

1 x 0.19 x 1.12 3.84 [89]

0.9 x 0.14 x 1.15 3.66 [90]

0.9 x 0.14 x 1.15 3.64 [90]

1 x 0.14 x 1.12 4.55 [90]

1 x 0.14 x 1.12 5.27 [90]

The experimental results gave a maximum compressive strength of 5.27Mpa mand inimum

was found to be 3.64 Mpa.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 34


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

The authors had given a conclusion that the inclusion of fibres had resulted to increase the

compressive strength and other physical properties.

5.2 Modelling of wallete

Wallete shall be modelled using available inputs, five walletes shall be modelled using different

blocks with varying fiber type and content.

5.2.1 Input data

Wallete 1

• Size of wallete: 1 x 0.19 x 1.12

• Youngs modulus: 1700Mpa

• Poissons ratio: 0.18

• Density of block: 1800Kg/m3

• Tangent modulus: 3000Mpa

Wallete 2

• Size of wallete: 0.9 x 0.14 x 1.15

• Youngs modulus: 1650Mpa

• Poissons ratio: 0.18

• Density of block: 1800Kg/m3

• Tangent modulus: 3500Mpa

Wallete 3

• Size of wallete: 0.9 x 0.14 x 1.15

• Youngs modulus: 1500Mpa

• Poissons ratio: 0.18

• Density of block: 1800Kg/m3

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 35


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

• Tangent modulus: 4000Mpa

Wallete 4

• Size of wallete: 1 x 0.14 x 1.12

• Youngs modulus: 1600Mpa

• Poissons ratio: 0.18

• Density of block: 1800Kg/m3

• Tangent modulus: 4000Mpa

Wallete 5

• Size of wallete: 1 x 0.14 x 1.12

• Youngs modulus: 1700Mpa

• Poissons ratio: 0.18

• Density of block: 1800Kg/m3

• Tangent modulus: 4500Mpa

Step 1: Modelling

Within ANSYS, there are numerous methods for creating model geometry, some more

convenient than others. The first step is to notice that the bracket can be readily constructed

using combinations of rectangle and circle primitives.

The isometric view of wallete modelled in ansys is shown in figure 5.2

Figure 5.2 Isometric view of wall

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 36


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Front view of modelled wallete in ansys is shown in figure 5.3

Figure 5.3 Front view of wall

The above figures refer to the geometry of the wallete i.e. Modelling refers to the creation of

the geometry of the object which is nothing but computer compatible mathematical description.

This model helps in displaying the image of the object crated and manipulated on the graphical

terminal by various software commands executed through the CPU and input devices.

Step 2: Meshing model

One useful feature of the ANSYS application is the ability to automatically mesh the model

without having to provide any mesh size parameters. This is referred to as a default mesh, apart

from defining a model, a lot of considerations must be taken for appropriate mesh production.

When producing correct meshes, Ansysmnormally takes three factors into account:

• Choosing shell vs. solid elements

• Choosing hex (brick) vs. tet (pyramids) elements

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 37


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

• Choosing the proper mesh size and mesh order

The isometric view of wallete meshing in ansys is shown in figure 5.4

Figure 5.4 Isometric view of meshing model

The front view of wallete meshing in ansys is shown in figure 5.5

Figure 5.5 Front view of meshing model

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 38


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Meshing is a pre-processing process that is done after the modelling of the model, Meshing is

one of the most critical processes in completing an accurate FEA simulation. A mesh is made

up of elements that contain nodes (coordinate positions in space that vary depending on

element type) that describe the geometry's form. An FEA solver cannot readily cope with

unusual forms, but it is considerably more at ease with standard shapes such as cubes. The act

of transforming irregular forms into more identifiable volumes known as "elements" is

known as meshing. Here in our case we have used Hexahedral element meshing or “hex”, at

lower element counts, hex or "brick" elements produce more accurate results than tet

elements.

Step 3: Loading and Boundary Condition

Loading and boundary conditions are used in the same way that they are tested experimentally and same
is shown in figures 5.6.

Figure 5.6 Applied compression load on Mud Block Masonry

Loading is used as the displacement boundary condition during the experimental testing,
Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 39
Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

which is followed by displacement control testing at a rate of 0.5 mm/min. Actual relevant

characteristics such as Poison's ratio, modulus of elasticity, tensile strength, stress-strain

behaviours, and shear transfer coefficients are determined by comparing FE stress-strain

curves to experimental findings.

Step 4: Applied Load condition

The table 5.3 refers to the load conditions, in ansys load can be applied in newton’s

Time(s) Z(N)

0 0

1 5.e+005

2 6.e+005

3 7.e+005

4 8.e+005

5 9.e+005

6 1.e+005

Table 5.3 Load conditions

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 40


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

5.3 Result and Observation

5.3.1 Wallete 1

The minimum principal stress obtained for applied load condition for wallete modelled is
shown in figure 5.7.

Fig 5.7 Minimum principal stress wallete 1


Maximum total deformation obtained for applied load condition is shown in figure 5.8

Fig 5.8 Maximum total deformation wallete 1

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 41


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

5.3.2 Wallete 2

The minimum principal stress obtained for applied load condition for wallete modelled is
shown in figure 5.9.

Fig 5.9 Minimum principal stress of wallete 2


Maximum total deformation obtained for applied load condition is shown in figure 5.10

Fig 5.10 Maximum total deformation wallete 2

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 42


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

5.3.3 Wallete 3

The minimum principal stress obtained for applied load condition for wallete modelled is
shown in figure 5.11.

Fig 5.11 Minimum principal stress of wallete 3

Maximum total deformation obtained for applied load condition is shown in figure 5.12

Fig 5.12 Maximum total deformation wallete 3

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 43


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

5.3.4 Wallete 4

The minimum principal stress obtained for applied load condition for wallete modelled is
shown in figure 5.13.

Fig 5.13 Minimum principal stress of wallete 4

Maximum total deformation obtained for applied load condition is shown in figure 5.14

Fig 5.14 Maximum total deformation wallete 4

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 44


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

5.3.5 Wallete 5

The minimum principal stress obtained for applied load condition for wallete modelled is
shown in figure 5.15.

Fig 5.15 Minimum principal stress of wallete 5

Maximum total deformation obtained for applied load condition is shown in figure 5.16

Fig 5.16 Maximum total deformation wallete 5

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 45


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Table 5.4 represents the analytical results, from these results obtained least strength is
obtained for wallete modelled using blocks made of bagasse fibres and maximum is
obtained for wallete modelled using blocks made of jute fibres.

Table 5.4 Analytical results

Sl.no Wallete Size (m) Strength (MPa)

1 1 x 0.19 x 1.12 3.44

2 0.9 x 0.14 x 1.15 4.34

3 0.9 x 0.14 x 1.15 4.10

4 1 x 0.14 x 1.12 5.03

5 1 x 0.14 x 1.12 5.97

It was observed that, increase in block compressive strength resulted in increased wallete

strength. It is well known that compressive strength of walletes with fibres will be more than

that of walletes tested with only mortar condition. The variation in compressive strength in

different walletes was found to vary from 20 – 59%. Minimum and Maximum compressive

strength of blocks was of the order 3.44 MPa and 5.97 MPa respectively.

For the walletes made of blocks from bagasse fibre the variation is 0.4% between experimental

and analytical results, similarly for other walletes the variation between experimental and

analytical results is lesser than 0.4-0.7%. It can be seen from the below figure 5.17 that increase

in compressive strength of block was found varying linearly, variation in block strength also affects

the compressive strength of walletes. Below table 5.5 represents combined values of analytical

and experimental results, we can observe clearly the difference between analytical values is

slightly varying from experimental values.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 46


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Table 5.5 Analytical and experimental results

Size of Specimen (m) Analytical Results Experimental Results

1 x 0.19 x 1.12 3.44 3.52

0.9 x 0.14 x 1.15 4.34 3.66

0.9 x 0.14 x 1.15 4.10 3.64

1 x 0.14 x 1.12 5.03 4.55

1 x 0.14 x 1.12 5.97 5.27

Figure 5.17 provides the comparison between experimental and analytical results.

7 y = 0.195x2 - 0.795x + 4.432


5.97 R² = 0.9684
Compressive Strength (MPa)

6 5.27
5.03
5 4.55
4.34 y = 0.0893x2 + 0.0393x + 3.476
4.1
3.84 3.66 3.64 R² = 0.9183
4 3.44 Experimental Results
Analytical results
3
Poly. (Experimental Results)
2
Poly. (Analytical results)
1

0
Wallete 1 Wallete 2 Wallete 3 Wallete 4 Wallete 5
Size (mm)

Figure 5.17 Graphical representation of experimental and analytical results

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 47


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Chapter 6

Conclusions
In this work, mechanical properties of stabilized mud blocks and masonry walletes were

analyzed for different properties. From the experimental studies adopted from the journal

and analytical studies carried out in ansys the following conclusions were drawn out.

6.1 Masonry Walletes


• The use of bagasse fibre in the mud blocks has helped to increase the compressive

strength linearly when bagasse fibre.

• From analytical studies the compressive strength of the walletes was found to be 3.44 Mpa

which is nearly same as experimental studies i.e. is 3.52 Mpa.

• Linear increase in walletes compressive strength was observed with coefficient of

regression more than 0.98.

• Comparison of error between experimental and estimated values was found to range

between 0.4-0.8% for walletes.

• It was observed that as load increases along time period the deformation was also increased

rapidly and deformation was found to be minimum and maximum for

400Kn,500Kn,1000Kn and maintained average deformation at 700,800 and 900Kn.

• The use of the ansys for analysis avoids the tedious, cost and time required to carry out

experimental studies and can be used as an effective alternative approach when

experimental work cannot be performed.

• Based on the limited study conducted, physical and mechanical properties of blocks

procured were found within the limits specified by IS 1725 – 2013. These blocks can

be used for load bearing masonry.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 48


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

6.2 Scope for future work

1. Experimental investigation of walletes by varying fiber content and mortar ratios.

2. Evaluating the effect of fiber as partial reinforcement material under different loading
conditions

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 49


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

REFERENCES

[1] A. B. N gowi, “Improving the traditional earth construction: A case study of Botswana,”
Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Feb. 1997, doi: 10.1016/S0950-
0618(97)00006-8.

[2] A. A. Sofi, T. A. Sheikh, R. A. Wani, and A. Manzoor, “Cement stabilized earth blocks
(CSEB): An economic and eco-friendly building material,” IOSR J. Mech. Civ. Eng. e-
ISSN, vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 6–11, doi: 10.9790/1684-1306050611.

[3] G. R. Mishra, G. Nath, and R. Paikaray, “Synthesis and characterization of microwave


absorbing material,” Indian J. Phys., vol. 94, no. 11, pp. 1749–1757, Nov. 2020, doi:
10.1007/s12648-019-01633-1.

[4] V. K. Thakur, M. K. Thakur, P. Raghavan, and M. R. Kessler, “Progress in green


polymer composites from lignin for multifunctional applications: A review,” ACS
Sustain. Chem. Eng., vol. 2, no. 5, pp. 1072–1092, May 2014, doi: 10.1021/sc500087z.

[5] A. Mohajerani et al., “Amazing types, properties, and applications of fibres in


construction materials,” Materials (Basel)., vol. 12, no. 16, pp. 1–45, 2019, doi:
10.3390/ma12162513.

[6] H. Myadaraboina, D. Law, and I. Patnaikuni, Sustainable Solutions in Structural


Engineering and Construction Edited by Chantawarangul DURABILITY OF BASALT
FIBERS IN CONCRETE MEDIUM. 2014.

[7] V. K. Thakur, M. K. Thakur, and R. K. Gupta, “Review: Raw Natural Fiber-Based


Polymer Composites,” International Journal of Polymer Analysis and Characterization,
vol. 19, no. 3. pp. 256–271, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.1080/1023666X.2014.880016.

[8] A. K. Bledzki and J. Gassan, “Composites reinforced with cellulose based fibres,”
Progress in Polymer Science (Oxford), vol. 24, no. 2. Elsevier Science Ltd, pp. 221–
274, 1999, doi: 10.1016/S0079-6700(98)00018-5.

[9] H. Binici, O. Aksogan, and T. Shah, “Investigation of fibre reinforced mud brick as a
building material,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 19, no. 4, pp. 313–318, 2005, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2004.07.013.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 50


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

[10] G. Díaz-Ramírez, F. Maradei, and G. Vargas-Linares, “Bagasse sugarcane fibers as


reinforcement agents for natural composites: description and polymer composite
applications,” Rev. UIS Ing., vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 117–130, 2019, doi:
10.18273/revuin.v18n4-2019011.

[11] L. Miccoli, U. Müller, and P. Fontana, “Mechanical behaviour of earthen materials: A


comparison between earth block masonry, rammed earth and cob,” Constr. Build.
Mater., vol. 61, no. December 2016, pp. 327–339, 2014, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.03.009.

[12] S. M. Hejazi, M. Sheikhzadeh, S. M. Abtahi, and A. Zadhoush, “A simple review of soil


reinforcement by using natural and synthetic fibers,” Construction and Building
Materials, vol. 30. Elsevier, pp. 100–116, May 01, 2012, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.045.

[13] H. Danso and D. Manu, “Influence of coconut fibres and lime on the properties of soil-
cement mortar,” Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 12, no. November 2019, 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00316.

[14] V. Sharma, H. K. Vinayak, and B. M. Marwaha, “Enhancing sustainability of rural


adobe houses of hills by addition of vernacular fiber reinforcement,” Int. J. Sustain. Built
Environ., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 348–358, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2015.07.002.

[15] V. Sharma, B. M. Marwaha, and H. K. Vinayak, “Enhancing durability of adobe by


natural reinforcement for propagating sustainable mud housing,” Int. J. Sustain. Built
Environ., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 141–155, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.ijsbe.2016.03.004.

[16] F. Parisi, D. Asprone, L. Fenu, and A. Prota, “Experimental characterization of Italian


composite adobe bricks reinforced with straw fibers,” Compos. Struct., vol. 122, pp.
300–307, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.11.060.

[17] “Ngowi_CBM_1997. Case Stud. Constr. Mater., vol. 12, no. November 1997, doi pdf.”.

[18] S. Raj, S. Mohammad, R. Das, and S. Saha, “Coconut fibre-reinforced cement-


stabilized,” no. May 2018, 2017, doi: 10.1108/WJE-10-2016-0101.

[19] C. K. Subramaniaprasad, B. M. Abraham, and E. K. Kunhanandan Nambiar, “Influence

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 51


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

of Embedded Waste-Plastic Fibers on the Improvement of the Tensile Strength of


Stabilized Mud Masonry Blocks,” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 27, no. 7, p. 04014203, Jul.
2015, doi: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0001165.

[20] M. Sassu et al., “Production procedures and mechanical behaviour of interlocking


stabilized compressed earth blocks (ISCEBs) manufactured using float ram 1.0 press,”
Eng. Solid Mech., vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 89–104, 2018, doi: 10.5267/j.esm.2018.3.004.

[21] A. L. Murmu and A. Patel, “Towards sustainable bricks production: An overview,”


Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 165, pp. 112–125, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.038.

[22] “Properties of Compressed Stabilized Earth Blocks (CSEB) For Low-Cost Housing
Construction: A Preliminary
Investigation.”Cost_Housing_Construction_A_Preliminary_Investigation (accessed
Jan. 19, 2021).

[23] C. Bock-Hyeng, A. N. Ofori-Boadu, E. Yamb-Bell, and M. A. Shofoluwe, “Mechanical


Properties of Sustainable Adobe Bricks Stabilized With Recycled Sugarcane Fiber
Waste,” 2016. Accessed: Feb. 11, 2021. [Online]. Available: www.ijera.com.

[24] “Bagasse fiber composites: A Review.” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 165, pp. 112–125,
2018, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.038.

[25] V. Vilay, M. Mariatti, R. Mat Taib, and M. Todo, “Effect of fiber surface treatment and
fiber loading on the properties of bagasse fiber-reinforced unsaturated polyester
composites,” Compos. Sci. Technol., vol. 68, no. 3–4, pp. 631–638, Mar. 2008, doi:
10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.10.005.

[26] S. D. Asagekar and V. K. Joshi, “Characteristics of sugarcane fibres,” 2014.

[27] “Bagasse - an overview | ScienceDirect Topics.” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 165, pp.
112–125, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.038.

[28] L. C. Dang, H. Khabbaz, and B. Fatahi, “An experimental study on engineering


behaviour of lime and bagasse fibre reinforced expansive soils Une étude expérimentale
sur le comportement d ’ ingénierie des sols expansifs renforcés de fibre de chaux et de

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 52


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

bagasse,” pp. 2497–2500, 2018.

[29] M. Nawaz, A. Heitor, and M. Sivakumar, “Geopolymers in construction - recent


developments,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 260, p. 120472, 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120472.

[30] F. Hernández-Olivares, R. Elizabeth Medina-Alvarado, X. E. Burneo-Valdivieso, and


A. Rodrigo Zúñiga-Suárez, “Short sugarcane bagasse fibers cementitious composites for
building construction,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 247, Jun. 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118451.

[31] J. Wei and B. Gencturk, “Degradation of Natural Fiber in Cement Composites


Containing Diatomaceous Earth,” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 30, no. 11, p. 04018282, Nov.
2018, doi: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0002486.

[32] M. Zahid, “Feasibility of Natural Fiber Reinforced Stabilized-Earth-Brick in Masonry


to Promote Sustainability,” 2019.

[33] S. Anandaraj, J. Rooby, P. O. Awoyera, and R. Gobinath, “Structural distress in glass


fibre-reinforced concrete under loading and exposure to aggressive environments,”
2019, Accessed: Jan. 18, 2021.

[34] “Use of vinasse and sugarcane bagasse for the production of enzymes by
lignocellulolytic fungi.” (accessed Feb. 17, 2021).

[35] E. B. Ojo, K. O. Bello, K. Mustapha, R. S. Teixeira, S. F. Santos, and H. Savastano,


“Effects of fibre reinforcements on properties of extruded alkali activated earthen
building materials,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 227, p. 116778, Dec. 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.116778.

[36] R. Lopez, V. M. Poblano, A. Licea-Clavere, M. Avalos, A. Alvarez-Castillo, and V. M.


Castao, “Alkaline surface modification of sugar cane bagasse,” Adv. Compos. Mater.,
vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 99–108, 2000, doi: 10.1163/15685510051029219.

[37] C. Onésippe, N. Passe-Coutrin, F. Toro, S. Delvasto, K. Bilba, and M. A. Arsène, “Sugar


cane bagasse fibres reinforced cement composites: Thermal considerations,” Compos.
Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf., vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 549–556, Apr. 2010, doi:

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 53


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.01.002.

[38] D. G. Devadiga, K. Subrahmanya Bhat, and G. T. Mahesha, “Sugarcane bagasse fiber


reinforced composites: Recent advances and applications,” Cogent Eng., vol. 7, 2020,
doi: 10.1080/23311916.2020.1823159.

[39] X. B. Zhao, L. Wang, and D. H. Liu, “Peracetic acid pretreatment of sugarcane bagasse
for enzymatic hydrolysis: A continued work,” J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., vol. 83,
no. 6, pp. 950–956, Jun. 2008, doi: 10.1002/jctb.1889.

[40] A. J. Choobbasti, M. A. Samakoosh, and S. S. Kutanaei, “Mechanical properties soil


stabilized with nano calcium carbonate and reinforced with carpet waste fibers,” Constr.
Build. Mater., vol. 211, pp. 1094–1104, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.306.

[41] D. S. Vijayan and D. Parthiban, “Effect of Solid waste based stabilizing material for
strengthening of Expansive soil- A review,” Environmental Technology and Innovation,
vol. 20. Elsevier B.V., Nov. 01, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.101108.

[42] M. Mostafa and N. Uddin, “Experimental analysis of Compressed Earth Block (CEB)
with banana fibers resisting flexural and compression forces,” Case Stud. Constr.
Mater., vol. 5, pp. 53–63, 2016, doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2016.07.001.

[43] K. F. Abdulla, L. S. Cunningham, and M. Gillie, “Experimental Study on the Mechanical


Properties of Straw Fiber–Reinforced Adobe Masonry,” J. Mater. Civ. Eng., vol. 32, no.
11, p. 04020322, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.1061/(asce)mt.1943-5533.0003410.

[44] S. Sangma, L. Pohti, and D. D. Tripura, “Size Effect of Fiber on Mechanical Properties
of Mud Earth Blocks,” in Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, vol. 32, Springer, 2019,
pp. 119–125.

[45] F. Wu, G. Li, H. N. Li, and J. Q. Jia, “Strength and stress-strain characteristics of
traditional adobe block and masonry,” Mater. Struct. Constr., vol. 46, no. 9, pp. 1449–
1457, Sep. 2013, doi: 10.1617/s11527-012-9987-y.

[46] D. Tripathy, P. Meghwal, and V. Singhal, “Strengthening of Lime Mortar Masonry


Wallettes Using Fiber-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix,” J. Compos. Constr., vol. 24,
no. 6, p. 04020075, Dec. 2020, doi: 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943-5614.0001086.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 54


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

[47] D. Castañeda et al., “Production of a lightweight masonry block using alkaline activated
natural pozzolana and natural fibers,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 253, 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.119143.

[48] P. Donkor and E. Obonyo, “Earthen construction materials: Assessing the feasibility of
improving strength and deformability of compressed earth blocks using polypropylene
fibers,” Mater. Des., vol. 83, pp. 813–819, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.matdes.2015.06.017.

[49] F. McGregor, A. Heath, E. Fodde, and A. Shea, “Conditions affecting the moisture
buffering measurement performed on compressed earth blocks,” Build. Environ., vol.
75, pp. 11–18, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2014.01.009.

[50] M. V. Madurwar, R. V. Ralegaonkar, and S. A. Mandavgane, “Application of agro-


waste for sustainable construction materials: A review,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 38,
pp. 872–878, 2013, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.011.

[51] Y. Millogo, J. C. Morel, J. E. Aubert, and K. Ghavami, “Experimental analysis of


Pressed Adobe Blocks reinforced with Hibiscus cannabinus fibers,” Constr. Build.
Mater., vol. 52, pp. 71–78, 2014, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.10.094.

[52] F. Stazi, M. Serpilli, G. Chiappini, M. Pergolini, E. Fratalocchi, and S. Lenci,


“Experimental study of the mechanical behaviour of a new extruded earth block
masonry,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 244, p. 118368, 2020, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118368.

[53] A. J. Choobbasti, M. A. Samakoosh, and S. S. Kutanaei, “Mechanical properties soil


stabilized with nano calcium carbonate and reinforced with carpet waste fibers,” Constr.
Build. Mater., vol. 211, pp. 1094–1104, Jun. 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.306.

[54] M. Nawaz, A. Heitor, and M. Sivakumar, “Geopolymers in construction - recent


developments,” Construction and Building Materials, vol. 260. Elsevier Ltd, p. 120472,
Nov. 10, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120472.

[55] A. Al-Fakih, B. S. Mohammed, M. S. Liew, and E. Nikbakht, “Incorporation of waste


materials in the manufacture of masonry bricks: An update review,” J. Build. Eng., vol.
21, no. September 2018, pp. 37–54, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.023.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 55


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

[56] H. Danso and D. Manu, “Influence of Coconut Fibres and Lime on the Properties of
Soil-Cement Mortar,” doi: 10.1016/j.cscm.2019.e00316.

[57] B. Medvey and G. Dobszay, “Durability of Stabilized Earthen Constructions: A


Review,” Geotech. Geol. Eng., vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 2403–2425, 2020, doi:
10.1007/s10706-020-01208-6.

[58] C. Udawattha, D. E. De Silva, H. Galkanda, and R. Halwatura, “Performance of natural


polymers for stabilizing earth blocks,” Materialia, vol. 2, pp. 23–32, Oct. 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.mtla.2018.07.019.

[59] K. Rashid, E. U. Haq, M. S. Kamran, N. Munir, A. Shahid, and I. Hanif, “Experimental


and finite element analysis on thermal conductivity of burnt clay bricks reinforced with
fibers,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 221, pp. 190–199, 2019, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.055.

[60] H. Yu, L. Zheng, J. Yang, and L. Yang, “Stabilised compressed earth bricks made with
coastal solonchak,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 77, pp. 409–418, 2015, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.069.

[61] P. Aghdasi and C. P. Ostertag, “Green ultra-high performance fiber-reinforced concrete


(G-UHP-FRC),” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 190, pp. 246–254, Nov. 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.111.

[62] E. R. Sujatha and S. Selsia Devi, “Reinforced soil blocks: Viable option for low cost
building units,” Constr. Build. Mater., vol. 189, pp. 1124–1133, 2018, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.077.

[63] A. Y. Patil, N. R. Banapurmath, and U. S. Shivangi, “Feasibility study of epoxy coated


Poly Lactic Acid as a sustainable replacement for river sand,” J. Clean. Prod., vol. 267,
p. 121750, Sep. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121750.

[64] K. S. Lekshmisathyababu and D. George, “STUDIES ON STABILIZED MUD BLOCK


AS A CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL,” Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res., vol. 7, no. 4, 2016,
Accessed: Jan. 19, 2021.

[65] N. Gangadhara Reddy, B. Hanumantha Rao, and K. R. Reddy, “Chemical Analysis

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 56


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Procedures for Determining the Dispersion Behaviour of Red Mud,” in Lecture Notes in
Civil Engineering, vol. 32, Springer, 2019, pp. 19–26.

[66] S. A. Bam, D. T. Gundu, and F. A. Onu, “Parametric Responses of Non-chemical and


Chemical Treatments of Bagasse Filler Reinforced Low Density Polyethylene
Composites,” vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 50–58, 2020.

[67] S. M. Luz, J. Del Tio, G. J. M. Rocha, A. R. Gonçalves, and A. P. Del’Arco, “Cellulose


and cellulignin from sugarcane bagasse reinforced polypropylene composites: Effect of
acetylation on mechanical and thermal properties,” Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf.,
vol. 39, no. 9, pp. 1362–1369, Sep. 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.04.014.

[68] M. J. John and R. D. Anandjiwala, “Recent developments in chemical modification and


characterization of natural fiber-reinforced composites,” Polym. Compos., vol. 29, no.
2, pp. 187–207, Feb. 2008, doi: 10.1002/pc.20461.

[69] S. K. Acharya, P. Mishra, S. K. Mehar, and V. Dikshit, “Weathering Behavior of


Bagasse Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composite,” J. Reinf. Plast. Compos., vol. 27, no.
16–17, pp. 1839–1846, Nov. 2008, doi: 10.1177/0731684407082544.

[70] K. Mahendran and N. P. Vignesh, “A Study on the Influence of Soil Properties and
Additives on the Strength of Mud Blocks.” Accessed: Feb. 28, 2021.

[71] P. Paa, K. Yalley, and E. Asiedu, “Enhancing the Properties of Soil Bricks by Stabilizing
with Corn Husk Ash,” Civ. Environ. Res., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 43–52, 2013, Accessed:
Feb. 28, 2021.

[72] “Strength property of laterite blocks made with different pozzolonic materials - Nigerian
Institution of Professional Engineers and Scientists.”
https://nipesjournals.org.ng/2020/09/14/strength-property-of-laterite-blocks-made-
with-different-pozzolanic-materials.

[73] A. Laborel-Préneron, J. E. Aubert, C. Magniont, C. Tribout, and A. Bertron, “Plant


aggregates and fibers in earth construction materials: A review,” Construction and
Building Materials, vol. 111. Elsevier Ltd, pp. 719–734, May 15, 2016, doi:
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.02.119.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 57


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

[74] “Promoting community-level job creation and income-generating activities through the
development of cost-effective building materials in Kyrgyzstan Mud stabilized blocks
production and use of technical manual for production" Accessed: Feb. 22, 2021.

[75] Bureau Of Indian Standards, “IS 2386-1 (1963): Methods of Test for Aggregates for
Concrete, Part I: Particle Size and Shape.”

[76] Bureau Of Indian Standards IS, vol. 383, 1970: Specification for Coarse and Fine
Aggregates From Natural Sources For Concrete [CED 2: Cement and Concrete],’”

[77] Bureau Of Indian Standards, “IS 2386-3 (1963): Methods of test for aggregates for
concrete, Part 3: Specific gravity, density, voids, absorption and bulking.”

[78] Bureau Of Indian Standards, “IS 2720-5 (1985): Methods of test for soils, Part 5:
Determination of liquid and plastic limit.”

[79] Of Indian Standards, IS: 8112- 2013: CED 2 Cement And Concrete.

[80] Bureau of Indian Standards, “IS 4031-5 (1988): Methods of physical tests for hydraulic
cement, Part 5: Determination of initial and final setting times.”

[81] Bureau Bureau Of Indian Standards, “IS 4031-1 (1996): Methods of physical tests for
hydraulic cement, Part 1: Determination of fineness by dry sieving.”

[82] Bureau Of Indian Standards, “IS 2720-3-1 (1980): Methods of test for soils, Part 3:
Determination of specific gravity, Section 1: Fine grained soils.”

[83] Bureau Of Indian Standards, "IS 1725, “Specification for soil based blocks used in
general building constructuion,” Indian Stand., p. 13, 1982.

[84] Bureau Of Indian Standards, “IS 1077 (1992): Common Burnt Clay Building Bricks -
Specification.”

[85] Bureau Of Indian Standards, “IS 3495 Parts 1-4 : Methods of Tests of Burnt Clay
building brick,” IS 3495 1992 - Parts 1 to 4 - METHODS TESTS Burn. CLAY Build.
BRICKS, pp. 1–7, 1992.

[86] Bureau Of Indian Standards, "IS 516:2014, “Method of Tests for Strength of Concrete,”
IS 516 - 1959 ( Reaffirmed 2004 ), p. New Delhi,India, 2004.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 58


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

[87] Bureau Of Indian Standards, “IS 5512-1983: Specification for flow table for use in tests
of hydraulic cements and pozzolanic materials,” Bur. Indian Stand. New Delhi, vol.
Reaffirmed, no. 2004, 1983.

[88] BIS, “Preparation and Use of Masonry Mortar,” Bur. Indian Stand. IS 2250, New Delhi,
1981.

[89] M. M. Salih, A. I. Osofero, and M. S. Imbabi, “Mechanical Properties of Fibre-


reinforced mud bricks,” Cce2018, no. December, 2018.

[90] B. V. Venkatarama Reddy, Stabilised soil blocks for structural masonry in earth
construction. Woodhead Publishing Limited, 2012.

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 59


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

Quartile Ranking of Journals

Sl no Journal Quality

1 International journal of sustainable building Q4


technology
And urban development
2 Structural engineering international Q4

3 International journal of geotechnical engineering Q2

4 Materials and manufacturing processes Q1

5 Energies Q2

6 International journal of architectural heritage Q1

7 International journal of innovative research in advanced Scop


engineering us
index
8 Airo international research journal Q1

9 International journal for scientific research & None


development

10 International journal of scientific & engineeringresearch Scop


us
index
11 International journal of emerging technology andadvanced None
engineering

12 International journal of emerging science and None


engineering

13 International journal of research in engineeringand Scop


technology us
index
14 Journal of materials in civil engineering Q1

15 Building research & information Q1

16 Building research & information Q1

17 Building research & information Q1

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 60


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

18 Journal of materials in civil engineering Q1

19 Journal of materials in civil engineering Q1

20 Journal of materials in civil engineering Q1

21 American society of civil engineers Q1

22 Journal of materials in civil engineering Q1

23 Journal of materials in civil engineering Q1

24 Journal of materials in civil engineering Q1

25 Case studies in construction materials Q1

26 Courrier du savoir Q3

27 Journal of critical reviews Scopus


index
28 Case studies in construction materials Q1

29 Journal of mechanical and civil engineering Scopus


index
30 International journal of civil engineering and technology Q3

31 International journal of scientific and research publications None

32 International journal for scientific research & development None

33 International journal of engineering and applied sciences Q1

34 International journal of innovative research in science, Scopus


engineering and technology index
35 International journal of engineering sciences & management Q3

36 International research journal of engineering and technology Scopus


index
37 International journal of advances in science engineering and Scopus
technology index
38 International journal of research in engineering and Scopus
technology index

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 61


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

39 International journal of civil and structural None


engineering

40 Journal of materials and environmental sciences Scop


us
index
41 International journal of engineering research & Scop
technology us
index
42 Materials and structures Q1

43 Journal of composites for construction Q1

44 Materials and structures Q1

45 Construction and building materials Q1

46 Materials science and engineering Q1

47 Transactions on the built environment Scop


us
index
48 Construction and building materials Q1

49 International journal of sustainable construction Q4


engineering & technology

50 International journal of scientific & engineeringresearch None

51 International journal of scientific & engineeringresearch Q1

52 Advances in civil engineering Q3

53 International journal of sustainable building Q3


technology and urban development

54 Building and environment Q1

55 Materials and design Q1

56 International journal of sustainable built Q1


environment

57 11th international brick block masonry None


conference

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 62


Structural Behavior of Fiber Reinforced Stabilized Mud Block Masonry

58 Construction and building materials Q1

59 Advances in civil engineering Q3


60 Case studies in construction materials Q1

Structural Engineering 2020-2021 Page 63

You might also like