Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PMP Mindset2 Points
PMP Mindset2 Points
5. More on the mindset: The prescribed approach is to always think it through BEFORE you act on
something (unless it deals with dire consequences like health and safety or mandatory
regulations). So questions about what you should do first or next almost always calls for thinking
it through (i.e. assessing the situation, evaluating the impact/ root cause, or reviewing the plan)
BEFORE doing the actual action.
6. The rule of don'ts (not absolute but in general): Don't remove a team member or a vendor.
Don't escalate to sponsor or PMO or product owner. Don't ask for budget increase. Don't add
more people. Assess the situation, evaluate the impact/root cause, review the plan, meet with the
team, then come up with the best solution.
7. If a team member is deficient in skill, put them on a training. If the stakeholders or the org are
new to agile, show them the benefits of agile (i.e. workshops, trainings).
9. You are a servant leader. Your role is always to support the team. Team conflict? Put them in
"one room" and facilitate mediation. Demotivated? Find out why, then act based on their
personal motivations. Erring team members? Remind the team about ground rules. Shared
resource? Talk to the functional manager and figure something out.
10. Changes? Assess and evaluate the impact on the project then go through the formal change
process, including approval. Never put a change through without approval.
11. If project is delayed, follow the following in order: a. Check risks and re-estimate b. Fast-track
c. Crash d. Cut scope e. Reduce quality
12. Take note of cue words: May/might/could means revisiting the risk register and risk
management plan. Will/would/has (or any event already done) means revisiting the issue log and
requiring an issue resolution.
13. MVP is the way to go when there are just too many wish lists from stakeholders but limited
resources. Use prototype when demonstrating the product's value.
14. Face to face communication is always the best unless team is dispersed geographically, in
which case you have to settle with virtual meetings.
15. In the process of closure? Get formal acceptance of the project deliverable with stakeholders
BEFORE lessons learned, BEFORE handover to Ops, BEFORE releasing team.
16. SPI is Schedule while CPI is Cost. To remember if it's good or bad, treat 1 like 100%, which is
the ideal baseline. Anything above 1 is good; anything below 1 is bad.
Xxxxxxx
Posted before but here it is again, also this is from someone else’s post:
The exam: Lots of situational questions Tips: Calculations: Always remember that (SPI
and CPI above 1) or (CV and SV above zero) are good, below is bad. S is Schedule
and C is Cost.
Situational questions: First, make it a habit to read the last sentence (the main
question) FIRST before reading the whole prompt. So you know to search what to:
Do? Action, normally see impact or if there is something already set in stone (The
approval has been given, Law regulations enforced) then do it
Do first? Normally review a document/asses situation
Should have been done? Look for Reactive things. Not actions to do now that there
is a problem.
Not do? Least likely/most likely? Most important least important? Notice the
subtlety.
Second, what framework are you in? (Agile, hybrid, predictive/waterfall?). That will
Help eliminate good sounding options that are not valid because they are from
another framework.
Third, which process are you in? Are you initiating,executing, M&C, closing?
Play this game until you got it almost perfectly. You need to know where you are in
the situational questions to exclude the options that are in before or later in the time
https://pmaspirant.com/project-management-process-group-and-knowledge-area-mapping-
game
Mentality: Always think like servant leader, forget about experience while attempting
pmp
Never ask for others to do your job (The sponsor, the pmo, the product owner...)
Always try face to face communication, Train your people is normally the best option.
May/might/claims = questions is about risk
Will/should/could = questions is about issue
Related to team issue = team charter
Stakeholder related = stakeholder engagement
Action is next step, assessing and review is 1st step
Remember while selecting answer = assess > review > action/implications
If questions related to safety problem, stop the project immediately (unless may
stop..)
If question likely to have problem due to new law may introduce or from internet
information = update the risk register. If not may then do the action to follow it.
If there is problem due to new law implications, seek for guidance
Problem between member = team charter, meeting preferably face to face(not apply
in case of multiple locations)
Asking help from Sponsor and pmo is NOT an option
Before any change, always asses and check impact
Change request is approved in formal process. NEVER implement any change by
yourself. Always with approval.
If anything missed in scope which may lead to rejection of deliverable = change
request
Adding extra features = talk to team
Meeting and coaching are the best options for conflict.
Quality control customer are best option
Not performing as expected = Quality
Bottom-up estimate is best option for cost
Prototype is best option for demo
Never remove a member, remove a vendor or hire a consultant
There should be predetermined acceptance rules for acceptance of delivery
If project required close, follow the formal process always.
If stakeholder don't know about agile, coach and teach them about agile
If there is any issue related to payment/contract with vendor always ask them to
check with appropriate department
Delay in item sent by vendor/ quality issue with vendor, meet and brainstorming with
team and come up with solutions
Always add communicated with pmo about status of project and customer in Sprint
Sprint is important for communication for both customer and team.
Not to take any bigger actions like a change request or closing a project without
taking care of the smaller tasks first. So whenever we see that "what should PM do
next/first" it's almost always a preliminary action like reviewing a plan or meeting
with the team and using the information gleaned in THAT step to make the decision
on the larger task:
1- assess/ analyze the problem to find out root cause 2- review the plan 3- meeting
Xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oh, here are also some notes I took from Andrew’s videos that helped…
always wrong:
Contact sponsor/escalate to management
Kick the can down the road/postpone things
Give the work to someone else (ask XYZ to do something)
Never replace staff -> never fire anyone
Always:
Assess as much as possible and don’t rush to action (if one answer is a risk
assessment and the rest are actual actions, more often than not it will be the right
choice)
Always hit problems head-on
Always try to find the root cause
Phrasing in questions
Threats -> negative risk
Opportunity -> positive risk
“May impact” -> risk
“Will impact” -> issue
Definition of done -> acceptance criteria in agile environments
Servant leadership encourages listening and communicating. Being a servant leader
means to talk to people, to “fetch food and water”, provide resources etc., remove
obstacles on the teams way, help them fix their issues.
Synonyms are scrum master, agile team lead, team facilitator.
Servant leadership: Listening
Empathy
Healing (when team members have had bad managers before)
Self awareness
Persuasion and collaboration
Conceptualization (how does this tie into company strategy)
Foresight (look at past and apply to future)
Stewardship (you have to be willing to put in the work for your team)
Commitment to people growth
Building community
Mindset:
Take Action
DIGCIV
- Determine problem
- Identify root cause
- Generate Alternatives
- Choose best alternative
- Implement
- Verify problem is solved
General Items:
Cccccccc
Mindset says - To look for "do first" in question which means not to take action right
away. Understand, review, assess, examine
We do not change scope just because someone is unhappy. Cause SH is unhappy,
PM would need to meet him to Understand, review, assess, examine the situation.
Once that is known the 2nd step is to make any necessary changes
Xxxxxxxxxx
These four materials are good enough.. But what really helped me pass was the PMP
mindset.. Its simply that:
If the project = predictive AND you are being asked to next/first then dont take any
action
If the project = predictive AND you are being asked to solve the situation then apply
servant leadership
If the project = agile AND you are being asked to do next/first/solve = the answer is
enforce agile principles (that covers the servant leadership)
Ďdddddddddddd
1 month ago
Click to rate this post!
[Total: 0 Average: 0 ]
This is definitely an article that anyone preparing for the PMP exam needs
to check out. The article will summarize tips & tricks to take the PMP exam
and will be constantly updated.
Content
1. Team
2. Stakeholders
3. Process
Team
The team's work let the team do it themselves, only help the team
when there is a blocker
If the team lacks certain skills, it is better to prioritize internal
training in the team than outsourcing
In a team that has a problem member, the PM must solve it in the
spirit that it is the problem of the whole team to help that member,
avoid blaming or blaming.
2 members conflict with each other, PM talks to both to find out the
reason, then uses interpersonal skills/emotional intelligent to
mediate
To motivate the team, prioritize the option of empowerment
(empower), trust, show them that their contribution is important to
the common goal, rather than using money, salary increase or
incentives
When a member has a performance problem, the PM must find out
the reason first, talk directly, handle it internally before escalate.
Stakeholders
Every time there is a new stakeholder, it is necessary to add the
stakeholder register and update the stakeholder engagement plan
When stakeholders are not interested in the project's information
system (PMIS), it is necessary to review whether the project has
provided enough and necessary information for them.
When there are communication problems with stakeholders
(stakeholders complain that they do not receive information, or
receive too much information), it is necessary to review the
communication management plan and stakeholder engagement
plan.
Once the customer has accepted the deliverables through each
iteration, the job is considered complete, even if the customer
complains about missing features at the end, client acceptance is
the basis for closing the project.
If you are a new PM assigned to the project, you need to talk to the
sponsor to know the overall status of the project
If the project lacks support from stakeholders because they are not
familiar with agile, prioritize agile training for them to gain support
Always prioritize win-win options when there is a resource conflict
with other projects or with the seller
Process
Always find a way to solve the problem first, discuss with the team,
then seek help from the expert, escalate upwards.
When there is an issue, PM must evaluate before making decision
PM's mindset is to always find the root cause to solve the problem
When there is a change request (from sponsor, customer,
stakeholder), it must go through the Product Owner
Any changes related to the contract must go through the change
contract process
Agile project always emphasizes incremental delivery to get early
feeback, thereby delivering value
Having difficult technical problems, new technology in agile projects
needs to be spiked
Velocity is trending down, discussed in retrospective
When a project is slow, never ask the team to work overtime or push
the team to do it fast. Always look for other options like
smoothing/crashing/leveling. If not, then escalate to sponsor.
If you encounter issues beyond PM's control (new request but out of
budget, issue related to community coucil), contact sponsor for
help
Źzzzzzzzzzzzz
1. I have seen many blog posts suggesting that you read the last line of
a question before you read the entire question to develop an
understanding about the context. My suggestion: DO NOT DO THIS.
It only wastes time as you have to reread everything again. Read
through the entire question as you naturally would. The questions in
the main exam will generally not have any unnecessary information,
so it’s better if you read normally through the entire question to get
the context.
12. Your answers should never be like you as a PM have done nothing
about the situation. Your action could be reviewing or assessing a
situation, implementing an action which is already approved or
coaching people or resolving conflicts or anything. Your answer
should always make it seem like the PM has acted/done something
about the situation.
13. If it’s a team related issue, you should refer to the team charter.
Read about the team charter.
14. Face to face interaction is best to resolve conflicts expect for cases
which involve multiple locations.
16. Never select options which involve drastic actions like terminating
contract, firing people, stopping payment, hiring people, closing
projects because of inconveniences.
17. Regarding changes: Always assess and analyse the impacts, then
follow change management process and if the change is approved
then implement the change. Do not implement change by yourself
without any approval for the change.
24. In case of a new regulation or law, first assess impact then seek
stakeholder’s advice
25. In case of contract related issues or payment related issues,
involve the respective department.
Best feedback
Here is the **list of tips** that I gathered from different reddit post:
• Always add communicated with pmo about status of project and customer in
Sprint
• Not to take any bigger actions like a change request or closing a project
without taking care of the smaller tasks first. So whenever we see that “what
should PM do next/first” it’s almost always a preliminary action like reviewing a
plan or meeting with the team and using the information gleaned in *THAT*
step to make the decision on the larger task
• **Crashing = adding resources (hours) Fast tracking = activities in parallel,**
# Tips: Calculations:
CPI and CPI above > 1 or CV and SV above > 0 are good, below is bad.
# Test Tips:
**First**, make it a habit to read the last sentence (the main question) FIRST
before reading the whole prompt. So you know to search what to…
• Do? Action, normally see impact or if there is something already set in stone
(The approval has been given, Law regulations enforced) then do it
• Should have been done? Look for Reactive things. Not actions to do now that
there is a problem.
• Not do? Least likely/most likely? Most important least important? Notice the
subtlety.
**Third**, which process are you in? Are you initiating, executing, M&C,
closing?
Play this game until you got it almost perfectly. You need to know where you
are in the situational questions to exclude the options that are in before or later
in the time
**Every project needs both a project charter and a team charter** in order to set
clear:
# Project Charter:
· The project vision
· Projects Benefits
· Definition of Done
· The intended flow of work
# Team Charter:
· Team value
Working agreements (such as what “ready” means so the team can take in
work; what “done” means so the team can judge completeness consistently;
respecting the time box; or the use of work-in-process limits)
· Ground rules (such as one person talking in a meeting)
· Group norms (such as how the team treats meeting times).
# Servant leadership
1. Involve your team, train them, don’t be a jerk
2. Review first, do after, never postpone actions
3. Never ask the Sponsor for help
4. Face-to-face solves conflict. Remind team of team charter.
5. Working with Virtual teams, invest in collaboration tools.
In a **predictive life cycle,** the project scope, time, and cost are determined in
the early phases of the life cycle. Any changes to the scope are carefully
managed. Predictive life cycles may also be referred to as waterfall life cycles.
So, before registering the issue I’m issue log, just check what the plan says
about non-conformity. May be you need to send a mail to the process owner
first and then register in issue log.
_always take your decisions based on the scenarios given in questions and
*compare the 2 confusing options* before choosing a correct one_
Dddddddddd
1.What should the PM do/do first *Assess/analyse the problem to find out the
root cause
*Review the plan
*Meeting
2.APG Pages 8,9,14,18,19,27,28,50 -56,90 -95
3.If a team is falling behind, use self-organizing method, thus work together.
If a team member is falling behind, PM must intervene
2. To reinforce your mastery of the mindset, invest on the PMI Study Hall or the
TIA Mock (or both) and practice answering as many questions as you could. I
would recommend investing on the SH for exam conditioning; the questions
there are more like the actual PMP questions than the TIA questions, both in
structure and content. On average, I was hitting 65-70% on the SH mock exams.
Without the expert questions, I was 85-90%.
3. If you have time, also watch this guy's practice questions, answers, and
explanations. Helps you solidify the PM mindset.
9. You are a servant leader. Your role is always to support the team. Team
conflict? Put them in "one room" and facilitate mediation. Demotivated? Find
out why, then act based on their personal motivations. Erring team members?
Remind the team about ground rules. Shared resource? Talk to the functional
manager and figure something out.
10. Changes? Assess and evaluate the impact on the project then go through
the formal change process, including approval. Never put a change through
without approval.
11. If project is delayed, follow the following in order: a. Check risks and re-
estimate b. Fast-track c. Crash d. Cut scope e. Reduce quality
12. Take note of cue words: May/might/could means revisiting the risk register
and risk management plan. Will/would/has (or any event already done) means
revisiting the issue log and requiring an issue resolution.
13. MVP is the way to go when there are just too many wish lists from
stakeholders but limited resources. Use prototype when demonstrating the
product's value.
14. Face to face communication is always the best unless team is dispersed
geographically, in which case you have to settle with virtual meetings.
15. In the process of closure? Get formal acceptance of the project deliverable
with stakeholders BEFORE lessons learned, BEFORE handover to Ops, BEFORE
releasing team.
16. SPI is Schedule while CPI is Cost. To remember if it's good or bad, treat 1
like 100%, which is the ideal baseline. Anything above 1 is good; anything
below 1 is bad.
April 2023
17. Read the question to understand what framework you're currently in. This
was a key thing for me because a lot of times the answer choices had an option
of Reviewing Change Management Plan when the question was asked about
agile framework.
If there's an option to Empower the team, letting the team self organize it's
generally the best option regardless of the framework. For instance, one of the
questions I had was on predictive framework and team is in the executing
phase. One of the options was to Empower the team to decide on the way
forward. I know this was the right answer because all the other options were
either escalating to Sponsor/PMO or replacing the entire team
In case of what should PM do next, the better option is to discuss with your
internal team/stakeholders before communicating something to external
stakeholders/customers. I had a question where the choices were either to
discuss with sponsor to find a way, stop the project and restart, halt the project
till a way is found and inform the customer that the project is having issue and
ask them to discuss this with sponsor.
Do not ask the team to work overtime - If the situation demands work with
them to find a way. For instance, if a critical resource is unavailable and there is
an upcoming deliverable. The best way is to work with the team to see how the
tasks could be managed.
A lot of questions were focused on removing impediments. There would be a
situation that would block the team from proceeding further, and as a
PM/Servant Leader you would need to determine your next action. In these
cases, I selected the option which was removing those impediments - generally
talking to the other department/vendor/functional manager.
There were options which were leaning towards being directive - Inform the
team member, Ask the team member and then the same question had a more
collaborative option - Work with the team member, Discuss with the team. I
selected the one which sounder more collaborative and inclusive.
18. It's hard to explain, but practically here are some elements to be aware of
when reviewing and answering questions and answer choices with this PM
mindset in mind:
1. Be proactive in your approach to problem solving as a PM. Don't transfer
responsibility and don't put problems off. Relatedly, don't elevate to the
sponsor unless rare circumstances call for it (eg major resource issues)
2. Emotional intelligence is key. PMs need to listen carefully and resolve
conflicts/problem solve collaboratively. You want to be as proactive as possible.
3. You often want to address an issue with the following process: identify issue,
assess/analyze issue with a focus on root cause (if not readily apparent), plan to
take action, take action, update plans accordingly (the last two may be flip-
flopped depending on issue/concern). I'd say this is a major piece of the
mindset - learning how to identify the issue and understand the sequence for
how to resolve it. 90% of the time it's going to be to follow this order of
operations
. 4. Project governance and compliance are key. You can't skip steps/processes
and these things must be upheld. Change processes must be followed
regardless of methodology. Again, all about sticking to established plans and
processes.
19. Always review or assess first, no matter what
Only act if something has been approved
Never delegate your job to someone else (PO, PS, PMO)
Always choose the answer that has colocation or face-to-face convos, even if it
seems like an illogical answer
For team issues, always pick the answer that facilitates collaboration and
enforces the ground rules/team charter
Bottom up costing will almost always be the correct answer in terms of costing
methods
Always use the formal change control process!!!"
20. More than half the questions had a simple trick as its either of the below
options –
Always analyse when there is a problem –
Never escalate –
Don't go to sponsor –
People issues – Always have individual discussion to understand why the
person has issues and either Empathize with them BUT If issue is skill - support
them by doing skill gap analysis and provide training (never remove, escalate
to HR or functional manager).
21. Always review or assess first, no matter what
Only act if something has been approved
Never delegate your job to someone else (PO, PS, PMO)
Always choose the answer that has colocation or face-to-face convos, even if it
seems like an illogical answer
For team issues, always pick the answer that facilitates collaboration and
enforces the ground rules/team charter
Always use the formal change control process!!!"
22. One key element that will help you pass this exam is endurance. I had
intended on taking a mock exam each of the last four days leading up to the
test... needless to say that didnt happen. By the 3rd round of questions, I was
having trouble focusing on the question and would have to read it 3-4 times.
Work on having the endurance to take this test. It could be the difference
between passing and ffailing.
23. Read the final sentence of the "Scenario Paragraph" and the question
prompt first. If you still need additional info, then read the full question.
The key detail is usually in the final sentence of the "scenario paragraph". This
will save a TON of time, and helps eliminate a lot of the clutter details
You most likely will have to pick out the methodology in the first sentence
though
Never take any action right away or escalate. Always analyze, evaluate,
facilitate, meet with project team and find a solution
Make sure to look for those key words. This usually helps eliminate 2 of the
answers, which are obviously incorrect. This will be wrong about 5% of the time
if there is a massive regulatory change or something, but just fall on the sword
for those questions to ensure you get the other 95% correct
There is usually an ESCALATE RIGHT AWAY/CANCEL THE PROJECT or a DO
NOTHING AND HOPE THINGS WORK OUT.
Identify which Methodology you are using (Predictive vs Agile)
The questions will help eliminate that final option. This answer sounds good,
but uses processes/methodologies from the wrong framework
EXAMPLE
Question: You are working on an experienced agile team developing a software
application. You have worked with stakeholders to gather all of the
requirements, and completed a product roadmap and feature release schedule.
An executive has requested delivery of the software to be delivered 6 months
ahead of schedule. What should the project manager do?
Correct Answer: Schedule a meeting with the project owner and team to
prioritize the backlog and define an MVP
Note that this sounds good, and uses all of the right terminology for the agile
framework
Incorrect Answer #1: Evaluate the impact of the request on the scope and
schedule, and complete the approved change control process
Note this answer sounds really good, BUT it uses the processes in a PREDICTIVE
approach instead of AGILE
Incorrect Answer #2: Ignore the executive's request and explain that changes
cannot be made since the schedule has already been approved.
Obviously wrong, you can't just ignore requests
Incorrect Answer #3: Remove features from the backlog yourself and inform
the project team of the updated schedule
Obviously wrong, you can't just go haywire
May
24
1. May/might/could, check the risk register and risk management plan.
2. Will/would/has (or an event taken place) -> Issue log and Requires a
Solution.
3. Questions with: what should the PM do first? -> Review/Assess, do not take
action!
4. Questions with: What should the PM do next?-> Do not take Action, Review,
Assess, Analyze. No action yet.
5. If offered the answer or situation: Always - meet with the team, then come
up with the best solution.
6. When asked for action-> Take Action! Do not review or analyze, you are
being presented with a scenario that asked this.
Ownership rules:
Don't escalate to sponsor or PMO or product owner.
Don't remove a team member or a vendor.
Money Rules:
Don't ask for budget increase.
Don't add more people.
June
12.The exam uses variations of
terms a lot especially in agile
(product backlog, project backlog)
3- the exam was mostly agile 4 -
there were almost no calculations.
Just prompts to demonstrate
understanding of the calculated
things.
For questions, use a PM mindset:
14.
Mindset and study questions. Below are some notes I've taken from my studies
and from around the web (including here). As I mentioned before, I like to take
concepts I got wrong on SH and structure them into mindsets for review. I used
this as a review before the test to shore up the knowledge that had gaps.
15.
July
Various tips:
-This might not be the best way to phrase this, but YOU are the
leader and manager so generally it's on YOU to deal with issues
before immediately escalating to a higher power as your first course
of action. So things like "Immediately escalate to the functional
managers" type of answers typically isn't the right one.
August
TIPS:
*Practice taking mock exams for 3hrs. Get enough rest and eat a clean breakfast. Something that
won't make you drowsy or upset your stomach.
*Eliminate answers using the strikethrough method, reread the questions and think about the
answer as it relates the question. Both answers might be right but the question might ask what
should you do FIRST or to RESOLVE the issue.
*For MOST questions DO NOT escalate to the sponsor, cancel the project, ask for an
extension/budget increase, or add more resources.
*The PRODUCT OWNER is the only person that prioritizes the backlog.
*PM should remove impediments. Empower, coach, and guide the team.
*Assess and analyze issues before acting on them, ensure they are added to the issue log first.
Discuss and consult with the team if that is an option.
*Always add the risk to the risk register, issues to the issue log.
*Have a great understanding of the tools used for Data Gathering, Data Representation, Data
Analysis.
*If there is a risk not previously identified, add it to the register then discuss it/assess it with your
team. Any risk on the risk register, refer to the risk management plan.
*Follow the change management process. Requests should be submitted to the CCB, do not make
changes before they are approved.
October
1) pick options that involve “speak/discuss/inform with the team”. They’re right 90% of the time
2) options that involve you making the decision on someone’s behalf is always wrong.
6) fk the math questions. Just roll a dice and move on. I only had 2 math questions
Źzxxxxxxxxxx
People
Process
30. calculation question with PERT Beta estimation; the question was to
calculate an estimation from a new contractor and compare it to an existing
contractor's price, and how much would you save was the real question.
31. Drag and drop was scenario had to distinguish if it was Agile, Hybrid,
Predictive,risk categories. A simple value analysis… how much would you save
if you sourced the resources internally vs externally.
32. One mapping was risk terms most won't be familiar with but can be figured
out based on the words ( Proximity simply means how close we are, in terms of
time, to a risk occurring. Dormancy is the window of time in which the risk has
occurred, but its impact went undiscovered. These were the two trickier terms
in the 4-set). The other was about lifecycles (matching examples as Predictive,
Agile, Hybrid, Both. Key is knowing the difference between a hybrid project and
an activity that is done is BOTH pure agile and pure predictive.). The calcs were
easy, a PERT question with the trick being the answer was how much was saved
not the pert estimate, and an easy communication channel ask ( n*[n-1] ) / 2. I
also had a burndown chart reading question that was pretty easy though I had
to read the answers twice as they were quite similar with minor differences.
33. calculation about pert. No risk vs issue questions. Many about regulations.
Few about change order. Very agile heavy. In fact, many about transitioning
into agile. And even some stuff that I swear I never heard befor
April 2023
34. Probably there were only 7-10 questions where I had some serious doubts. In
total there were 10 questions to select 2 answers and 3 questions to match the boxes
(type of project approach with some basic assumptions). One question with the basic
calculation (risk based budget calculation) and one with a burnup graph
interpretation.
35. That said if you don’t know your agile ceremonies and roles or the basics of
servant leadership you are likely to have major issues on the exam.
36. I got 2 match up questions and 1 of them was unknown to me (matching risk
conditions with Dormancy and Proximity, etc). And 1 PERT calculation question which
also got me (with multiple viables and cannot fit into (O + 4M + P)/6).
37. The questions were fairly easy and very similar to those in SH. 01 PERT, one odd
of EVM and 02 drag and drops. Mostly agile related questions. I found all three
sections equal as far as difficulty level is concerned
38. Agile questions mostly. I got PERT calculation. I got 2 drag and drop one related
to Risk characteristics and the other related to agile/waterfall/ hybrid management
models.
39. Exam tips - the exam was a FULL ON 70% agile. Understand the soft skills you
need to work in a agile environment. Understand what servant leadership means,
practically. Get good at distinguishing between agile and hybrid projects. Understand
the differences between how scope is managed in agile versus traditional projects.
Definitely understand earned value but don't memorize, wrap your head around it.
Know when to escalate to sponsor - (HINT: way less often than many people would
IRL).
40. The first section was pretty easy, but the other two were slightly more difficult.
One PERT question ,2-3 matching questions (they were pretty straightforward).No
questions on student syndrome, sandbagging, etc. Mind-set is key. Over 80% of the
questions were situational. Whenever you answer the questions, be a kind soul and
try to be inclusive, welcoming, and motivating as much as possible.
41. My exam did have a PERT question and mentioned scrum a couple of times but
those were things was familiar with already
42.My exam experience-
had a couple "choose 2" questions.
had a couple "choose 3" questions.
had 2 drag & drop questions.
one pert question.
one chart interpretation question- burnUP chart.
nothing on Parkinson law or student syndrome. was familiar with already.
42. Around half of the questions were agile or hybride PM. 2 drag and drop, 5
multiple choice, 1 interpretation of burn up chart, the rest were single choice
questions. 95% or even more were situational questions. Some had really easy and
obvious correct answer, but most had 2 answers you can rule out right away, and 2
that both seemed as they could be correct response.
43. Bottom up costing will almost always be the correct answer in terms of costing
methods.. Only one calculation and that too PERT. Nothing on SPI or CPI
44. Exam Questions:
PERT calculation - I didn't memorize any formulas (lol) so I took an educated
guess
2 drag and drop - 1 on methodology and 1 on management style
Questions were almost all situational with quite a few related to
o handling conflict between team members
delay in materials
change in resources
new system implementation will lead to delays
o Understand if it is a risk/issue and the impact of said risk/issue to
determine if you have time to analyze or need to act/escalate
o regulatory changes i.e. new government regulation will impact
project, what should you do first
45. Make sure to memorize formulae - PERT evaluation, CV,SV, SVI, CPI ( had
questions on the exam w.r.t formulae based calculations on these topics)
46. Have your concepts straight. Understand where and when the most important
artifacts are used, Assumptions Log, Risk Register, Issue Log (subtle differences
between Risk and Issues), Change management process, etc. There were at least 7-8
choose two options, 1 PERT question that I wasted at least 5 mins on but couldn't get
the correct answer to and two drag-and-drop questions.
47. Overall, almost all situational questions, knowing the process and definitions
helps. I had 2 drag and drops. 1 formula question that was way long and I spent the
longest time on this question - it required 2 PERT formulas to solve the question, I'm
pretty confident I got it right after all that.
Things I kept reminding myself was "what would PMI do". Never skip a formal
process. Never delegate your work to someone else. Let the team make decisions. Be
a servant leader. If multiple answers looked correct, I would try to put them in order
of what you really should do FIRST, which was usually analyze something or get more
info/facts.
48. If you ask me what type of questions - 1 -PERT, 2 Drag & drop, 1 Burnup
chart, rest all scenario-based questions - Agile/hybrid/predictive - mostly
agile.Once again Guys------ M I N D S E T is the KEY.....!
49. There were a couple of silly easy ones like a simple PERT calculation + which
process should we use in this situation; otherwise - lots of conflict management
questions. And tons of questions where you just had to pick the option which
was “review with the team” There were a few arbitrary ones I literally didn’t
know the answer to them. I just eliminated the options I knew was wrong and
hoped I clicked on the right one. There was a lot of agile specific questions and
more “what will you do, what should you do”. I had a couple questions where I
had to be the “product owner” so my biggest biggest advice is - READ THE
QUESTION. There are hints in it. Highlight the important key words.
50. One PERT calculation which seems to be the norm lately. 2 drag & drop.
Good mix of quality, risk, conflict management, when to go to sponsor,
schedule & budget issues, compliance,0 estimating, life cycle choice & “what to
do next/first”.
Oh, and several on remote teams….to me seemed like Covid scenarios stating
“unforeseen circumstances” causing remote teams & how to handle. But also
global teams & how to work with & keep engaged.
Did you also get any burn chart related question! If yes, was it easy to
understand? There was one, yes, and it was easy. It has a chart that you just had
to interpret what it said ie too much work, not enough, etc.
51. Literally barely any questions on predictive, fairly exclusively on agile
mindset. Two drag and drop. One to interpret a burndown chart and what
action to take based on it. Zero on CPI / SPI. One on PERT.
52. I had 1 PERT Question, 0 Hot Spot Questions, and 3 Drag/Drops. The exam
was almost entirely situational, and around a 70/30 split of hybrid/agile vs.
traditional.I
53. 1 PERT Question; most questions are 2 -3 sentences long and 1 Burnup
question. Most questions were situational (What would you do first / next /
How would you approach etc.).
Exam:
54.Nearly all MC, 2 drag and drop, 1 calculation (PERT), and one chart. The
PERT wasn't straightforward, you had to calculate the PERT # and then use it to
input in other numbers. I hadn't seen this additional piece before so that was
interesting.
Heavy agile like most people say.
I honestly was not confident throughout. I didn't think I missed enough to fail
but my confidence was all over the place. The mindset is absolutely necessary
to understand, but my biggest hurdle was all of the terms. While I didn't need
to necessarily know what input/output of everything, there were so many terms
that I recommend really knowing. For example, requirements traceability
matrix vs. work breakdown.
Lots of quality and risk questions. Some wording I found frustrating/confusing
as they tell you not to assume but the question mentions two areas and you
have to figure out which one is the actual problem area. For example
mentioning identifying a risk but also implying a communication breakdown
and then having to decide whether it's a risk issue or a communication issue.
It's possible I overthought these.
55I had one PERT calculation, 2 matching, one graph to figure out, and pretty
much everything else was "what should the PM do now/first/next/etc."
Understanding servant leadership/EI and agile were pretty important in my
experience. Always assess first. I also wore blue in honor of the folks here than
routinely share their feedback.
56. My exam impression: Nearly 100% of the exam was situation and non
specific. I was shocked at not getting a single question requiring knowledge of
specific agile frameworks or principles, ittos, process groups, not one single
formula or calculation (ok technically one PERT but the numbers were such that
if you took a regular old average you would have gotten the right answer
anyway haha). Frankly, if you are decent at test taking and reading
comprehension, you’ll probably pass with not that much prep.
57. Hi guys, most is covered by others, I wanted to share my findings. 2 x drag
and drop, few multiple answer, 1 x calculation. 20 minutes left on the clock.
Most questions I felt were about agile and hybrid however nothing with
complex terms, mostly agile mindset and leadership. A lot of questions on
distributed teams, solving issues remotely and dare I say Covid-like scenarios
(e.g your entire team needs to switch to remote by unforeseen circumstances).
A lot of questions on switching from predictive to agile (I guess it’s a popular
topic)
June
58.There we’re a lot more
questions on regulatory projects
than I was expecting. A lot of
conflict management. Lots of
stakeholder communication as
well.
59. Exam and Questions:
1. 70% Agile
2. 60-70 % were from Risk, Quality,
Stakeholder, and Communication.
3. 15/20 govt/regulation project
questions 3. 7 Multiple
4. 2 Drag & drop
5. 1 PERT
6. 80% SH moderate standard
7. Left 4 marked
8. In the last segment marked
options that start with
assess/review/evaluate/review 😂
.TIME
Once you finish answering the 60th question, the computer will pop up a prompt
asking if you want to review your questions, you can then proceed to review any you
might have flagged or didn't answer. After you're finished reviewing, or if you opt to
skip reviewing, it'll ask if you want to take your break now. You can then select yes,
and the timer will start. Then you will raise your hand and the proctor will either
come inside to get you, or wave you to come out. They'll check you out of the test
room, and you can take your break. Please keep in mind that you might have a few
min b/c of the start of the officially timer until you actually get checked out of the
room, and also it might take a few min to get back in as well, as they do thorough
check-in process when you come back. The second break is the same deal, after your
120th question, it'll give you the option to review questions then proceed to your
break.
Please keep track of your time, go with a plan, and never get hung up on one
question for a long time; mark it for review and move on. It is tough to think
correctly at the end when time is running out.
Application
The application part was actually easier than I had expected. I suppose it helps that I
wasn't audited. Beyond AR's Application section on Udemy, I just searched for
previous application formats within the sub and formulated mine similar to theirs. I
would say I borrowed the most from u/WayneHrPr's Application Review post. Once I
realized that all I had to do was translate actual actions into the keywords they were
searching for, things got much less stressful and I was able to essentially build from
the format used in Wayne's application. Again, I wasn't audited, so I'm not sure how
correct of a strategy this was, but it's what I did.
ECO Mindset
After doing an exam analysis, I noticed that the PMP Exam Content Outline already shows what the
MINDSET should be in approaching the situation-based questions.
People Domain:
1. Enabler: Identify and address conflicts promptly to maintain a positive team environment and
project progress.
1. Enabler: Set clear expectations, provide guidance, and motivate team members to achieve project
goals.
1. Enabler: Provide necessary resources, remove obstacles, and offer support to optimize team
performance.
1. Enabler: Identify skill gaps, provide training opportunities, and promote continuous learning and
development.
1. Enabler: Select and onboard team members with the right skills, capabilities, and diversity to
enhance team performance.
7. Task: Address and remove impediments, obstacles, and blockers for the team
1. Enabler: Identify and resolve issues that hinder team progress, ensuring a smooth workflow.
1. Enabler: Facilitate discussions and reach mutually beneficial agreements with stakeholders to
establish project expectations.
1. Enabler: Foster open and constructive communication, actively involve stakeholders, and seek
their input throughout the project.
1. Enabler: Leverage virtual collaboration tools, establish clear communication channels, and provide
support to remote team members.
12. Task: Define team ground rules
1. Enabler: Provide guidance, support, and knowledge transfer to stakeholders, helping them
contribute effectively to the project.
14. Task: Promote team performance through the application of emotional intelligence
1. Enabler: Recognize and manage emotions, build rapport, and foster a positive team culture to
enhance overall performance.
Process Domain:
1. Task: Execute project with the urgency required to deliver business value
1. Enabler: Prioritize tasks, manage dependencies, and drive project execution to achieve timely
delivery of value.
1. Enabler: Establish effective communication channels, ensure clear and timely information flow,
and engage stakeholders appropriately.
1. Enabler: Identify and analyze risks, develop mitigation strategies, and monitor and respond to
potential risks throughout the project.
1. Enabler: Identify stakeholders, understand their needs and expectations, and involve them in
project decisions and activities.
1. Enabler: Develop a realistic project schedule, track progress, and manage schedule changes to
meet project milestones and deadlines.
1. Enabler: Define quality standards, establish quality assurance processes, and conduct regular
inspections to ensure deliverables meet requirements.
1. Enabler: Coordinate various planning processes, align project components, and ensure
consistency and integration across project activities.
1. Enabler: Assess change requests, evaluate impacts, obtain approvals, and implement changes
following established change management procedures.
1. Enabler: Identify procurement needs, define procurement strategies, solicit bids, and manage
contracts with vendors and suppliers.
1. Enabler: Develop and maintain project documentation, including plans, reports, and records, to
ensure accurate and accessible project information.
1. Enabler: Select and tailor project management methodologies, frameworks, and best practices
based on project requirements and organizational context.
1. Enabler: Define project roles, responsibilities, and decision-making authority, and establish
governance processes to ensure effective project oversight.
1. Enabler: Identify and track project issues, analyze their impact, and implement appropriate
actions to resolve or mitigate them.
1. Enabler: Document lessons learned, facilitate knowledge sharing, and ensure the transfer of
critical project knowledge to support future projects.
1. Enabler: Define and execute closure activities, conduct project reviews, and ensure a smooth
transition to the next project phase or project closure.
1. Enabler: Understand and comply with relevant laws, regulations, and organizational policies
throughout the project lifecycle.
2. Task: Evaluate and deliver project benefits and value
1. Enabler: Identify and measure project benefits, align project outcomes with organizational
objectives, and deliver value to stakeholders.
3. Task: Evaluate and address external business environment changes for impact on scope
1. Enabler: Monitor external factors, assess their impact on project scope, and proactively adapt the
project to address changes.
1. Enabler: Identify change impacts, develop change management plans, and support stakeholders in
adopting and embracing organizational changes.
To test, try to comment on a situation question you have encountered and try to map under what
Domain, Task, and Enabler that question would fall. The answer will be patterned with an Enabler.
Team Charter
Ground rules
These are simple guidelines, which team is expected to follow during the project execution.
Some examples of the ground rules : Only 1 person can speak at a time in a meeting
Working agreements
Similar to ground rules, but focuses on team's overall efficiency and working agreements are specific
to the team's ongoing work and evolve as the team learns and adapts throughout the project.
Some example of the working agreement can be, 1. team deciding to do the sprint
retrospective meeting at the end of sprint or 2. scrum team decides to send the sprint report 2-
days after the sprint end
What I took from that section was there are more appropriate responses/actions to take based
on what is being asked in the question. What should a project manager DO, the answer is
usually something that involves taking action to resolve the issue. DO FIRST is usually
assess or analyze a situation. DO NEXT is kind of similar, but for these types of questions the
responses were usually review a plan or update a plan or update an issue log and work with
change management. That was my interpretation.
I don't know if this helps but when I think of NOT DO or NOT DONE I look for the worst
answer. What's the last thing I would pick in this situation. What sounds so awful that it has
to be picked. I find that with those types of questions, I'm not even reading them because
they're far too wordy. And they're far too confusing when you've been training your brain in a
certain way to prepare for the exam. For what it's worth, there were probably less than 5 NOT
DO questions. Most of them were DO or DO FIRST/DO NEXT.
2, Second image: We will check on the user stories completed, not the story
points
Nnnnnnnn
I passed my PMP Exam at a test centre! I wore a heavy blue shirt of course!
I sat at my desk at 9.10am and finished at 12.23 including the 2 10 min break which I
took.
I found the exam equally difficult in each part. I was never really sure of the answer I
was giving and I was seriously doubting succeeding it when I clicked to submit it. I
had 2 drags and box and 5 or 6 multiple answer question
That being said here is my Study plan and timeline. It took overall 84h in 1 month
- Material AR
- Study Hall
- 200 Agile Questions
Here is the list of tips that I gathered from different reddit post:
3- Meeting / communicate
MINDSET:
• If a stakeholder is unhappy review and implement the plan, they are not happy
about.
• PM resolves conflict
• when managing a team, you are supposed to help/facilitate the team to come to a
solution, not directing them
• never escalate to anyone or defer decision, pm role is to solve not to deter decision
to someone else (know kinda ironic with the above point)
• if there is a trouble maker or someone that isn't performing, always talk to him/her
alone to understand the situation instead of discussing in a team.
• Always think like servant leader, forget about experience while attempting pmp
• Never ask for others to do your job (The sponsor, the pmo, the product owner...)
• If questions related to safety problem, stop the project immediately (unless may
stop..)
• If question likely to have problem due to new law may introduce or from internet
information = update the risk register. If not may then do the action to follow it.
• If stakeholder don't know about agile, coach and teach them about agile
• If there is any issue related to payment/contract with vendor always ask them to
check with appropriate department
• Delay in item sent by vendor/ quality issue with vendor, meet and brainstorming
with team and come up with solutions
• Always add communicated with pmo about status of project and customer in Sprint
• Not to take any bigger actions like a change request or closing a project without
taking care of the smaller tasks first. So whenever we see that “what should PM do
next/first” it’s almost always a preliminary action like reviewing a plan or meeting
with the team and using the information gleaned in THAT step to make the decision
on the larger task
Tips: Calculations:
CPI and CPI above > 1 or CV and SV above > 0 are good, below is bad.
Test Tips:
First, make it a habit to read the last sentence (the main question) FIRST before
reading the whole prompt. So you know to search what to…
• Do? Action, normally see impact or if there is something already set in stone (The
approval has been given, Law regulations enforced) then do it
• Should have been done? Look for Reactive things. Not actions to do now that there
is a problem.
• Not do? Least likely/most likely? Most important least important? Notice the
subtlety.
Second, what framework are you in? (Agile, hybrid, predictive/waterfall?). That will
Help eliminate good sounding options that are not valid because they are from
another framework.
Third, which process are you in? Are you initiating, executing, M&C, closing?
Play this game until you got it almost perfectly. You need to know where you are in
the situational questions to exclude the options that are in before or later in the time
Every project needs both a project charter and a team charter in order to set clear:
Project Charter:
· Projects Benefits
· Definition of Done
Team Charter:
· Team value
Working agreements (such as what “ready” means so the team can take in work;
what “done” means so the team can judge completeness consistently; respecting the
time box; or the use of work-in-process limits)
Parkinson’s Law: This occurs when an activity is completed before deadline but
resources are still improving the work until the due date is reached. The time spent
on the activity is often expanded and finished at the last minute (ie to fill the time
that’s been allocated)
Self-protection: This is the concept when workers fail to report early completion of
activities out of fear that management team will adjust future standards and demand
more next time.
Servant leadership
In a predictive life cycle, the project scope, time, and cost are determined in the early
phases of the life cycle. Any changes to the scope are carefully managed. Predictive
life cycles may also be referred to as waterfall life cycles.
Adaptive life cycles can be iterative, or incremental. The scope is outlined and agreed
before the start of an iteration. Adaptive life cycles are also referred to as agile or
change-driven life cycles.
▹ In an iterative life cycle, the project scope is generally determined early in the
project life cycle, but time and cost estimates are routinely modified as the project
team’s understanding of the product increases. Iterations develop the product
through a series of repeated cycles, while increments successively add to the
functionality of the product.
A hybrid life cycle is a combination of a predictive and an adaptive life cycle. Those
elements of the project that are well known or have fixed requirements follow a
predictive development life cycle, and those elements that are still evolving follow an
adaptive development life cycle.
Came across so many question on which documents to update scenario based,
AGILE Team member informed taking sick leave for few weeks, how you manage
Q. Local community not informed about the project impacting people, how you
would have prevented this situation
Q. Managing Team member conflicts internally , conflicts with external Team ( 2 diff
questions)