POSITION PAPER: Actions taken by the government to address poverty

The Philippines grapples with the enduring challenge of poverty, prompting the
government to implement notable initiatives such as the Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino
Programme (4Ps) and establish the National Anti-Poverty Commission (NAPC). While
these endeavors are commendable, a critical examination reveals certain concerns that
merit attention. This critique delves into the sustainability of conditional cash transfer
programs, bureaucratic efficiency, geographical inclusivity, and the persistent issue of
corruption, all of which influence the effectiveness of poverty alleviation efforts.

The conditional cash transfer program, 4Ps, has undoubtedly provided immediate
financial relief to vulnerable families. However, a significant concern arises regarding its
long-term impact. The risk of creating a dependency culture looms large if not
accompanied by concurrent measures that empower recipients beyond financial
assistance. Skill development, job creation, and entrepreneurship initiatives must align
with cash transfers to ensure families can break free from the cycle of poverty rather
than perpetuating reliance.

Moreover, the efficacy of the National Anti-Poverty Commission faces scrutiny in terms
of bureaucratic inefficiencies and adaptability. Streamlining processes within the NAPC
is vital to enhance its responsiveness to evolving economic challenges. The
organization's ability to adapt swiftly and effectively to dynamic socio-economic
conditions is integral to its success in alleviating poverty.

Another critical point of examination is the geographical focus of these initiatives. While
the 4Ps operates in 17 regions, concerns arise regarding the equitable distribution of its
impact. Certain areas may be underserved, necessitating a more geographically
inclusive approach to address the diverse and widespread nature of poverty in the
Philippines adequately.

The challenge of corruption continues to cast a shadow over the success of poverty
alleviation programs. Misuse of funds and a lack of transparency in resource allocation
can undermine the intended benefits of these initiatives, eroding public trust and
hindering progress. The eradication of corruption within the implementation of these
programs is paramount to ensuring their effectiveness.

In conclusion, while the Philippine government's commitment to poverty alleviation

through initiatives like the 4Ps and NAPC is commendable, a thorough critique
underscores the need for a comprehensive strategy. Governments worldwide employ a
diverse range of measures to tackle poverty comprehensively. By combining social
welfare programs, educational initiatives, labor market policies, housing strategies,
inclusive economic growth, and international cooperation, governments strive to create
a more equitable and just society where the impacts of poverty are mitigated, and
opportunities for prosperity are accessible to all. Addressing the concerns
raised—sustainability of conditional cash transfer programs, bureaucratic efficiency,
geographical inclusivity, and the persistent challenge of corruption—is not only
necessary for the immediate impact of these programs but is essential for fostering
lasting economic independence and empowerment among the impoverished population.
A nuanced and adaptive approach is crucial for navigating the complexities of poverty
alleviation in the Philippines and ensuring a meaningful impact on the lives of those in
need.

Reference:
Arnold Ventures. (2021, March 25). The Source: What Can the Government Do to
Address Poverty?
https://www.arnoldventures.org/stories/what-can-the-government-do-to-address-poverty
?fbclid=IwAR2bd7qugLvV3B_z0YecEKFqKMvz5PTUXUhjAQGK0RR0KsW5QLS2a5wh
08Y
The Borgen Project. (2020, September 25). COMBATING POVERTY IN THE
PHILIPPINES
https://borgenproject.org/poverty-in-the-philippines-3/?fbclid=IwAR1bfTX3XqMno1Onw8
LER_TH6bwvB0WKmVTuxBBQnXCehLfgb1cAis7DTKQ
Sage Journals. (2000, June). Governance, good government and poverty reduction.
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0020852300662004?fbclid=IwAR0kIFl1jQ
StdMhmUgS0oFOlE-roSgj3oCW2aeOUbBXbPGjc6TX-VrZcyb0
Pantawid Pamilyang Pilipino Program (4PS) | DSWD Field Office CAR Official website.
(n.d.).
https://car.dswd.gov.ph/programs-services/core-programs/pantawid-pamilyang-pilipino-p
rogram-4ps/
Science Direct. (2001, March). Urban policy as poverty alleviation: the experience of the

Philippines
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S019739750000031X?fbclid=IwAR

2t7jWJeEP_ySX8cIgPRsY9tNX-h57pQaTKXQj5TkugEIKNpuBqb5aSfWM

CNN Philippines (September 23, 2015). The Source: Ways to reduce poverty [Video]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?si=BidJRx1uSkYJqX8-&fbclid=IwAR3ViCt0llemMbkO7

phZXyLnCDP2fcLnIgshUH99m0MDZ3rQTbbl5UXfrTE&v=E8zSWEoj_rc&feature=youtu

.be

PROPONENTS: SUBMITTED TO:

Sasaban, Ian Ms. Xenia Claire Catedral

Queje, Princess Wenard Mr. Geronimo Hermoso

Gonzales, Katherine Ms. Guadalope Lomocso

Cagadas, Ashty

Nale, Franz Ashley

Ebale, Ryan

Aragon, Nothel Jane

Momo, Victor Tracy