Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Section No. 1
Date Of Experiment January 28, 2022
Performed
Due Date February 4 , 2022
Chemical engineering related industries use the study of optical pyrometers and total radiation
pyrometers to measure temperatures where contact with the temperate body is not possible [2]. The
importance of this experiment is to understand the physical and functional operations of the
pyrometer. The ability to determine temperatures at varying voltages is important to deepen the
understanding of heat transfer and its uses in the real world. In addition to the theory of the
experiment, the mathematical aspects also contribute to application of theoretical concepts. For this
experiment, mathematical concepts such as total radiation intensity and the inverse square law will be
observed in detail.
Optical pyrometer:
on the brightness of an object and the brightness of a filament placed inside the optical pyrometer.
The optical pyrometer aids in determining high temperature objects which cannot be measured with
contact. This lab uses the optical pyrometer to target an incandescent light bulb whose tungsten
filament can be varied by adjusting the supply voltage. To obtain a photometric match between both
the target and its reference, brightness of filament is to be varied until it reaches the desired
brightness in the source [2,4]. A current will be regulated through the adjustment of the side knob on
the pyrometer. Once the brightness of the reference filament matches that of the target filaments, the
reference image of the filament is equivalent to that of the background colour in the pyrometer [1].
When this occurs, intensity of energy emitted from the target will be equal to that emitted from the
reference filament. By using the measured intensities, the temperature of the light bulb can be
determined. The temperature of the subject will then be on display for a digital readout. The ideal or
black body is taken into account in this experiment as the total energy emitted is directly proportional
to temperature at the fourth power. But, not all practical objects are black bodies and thus an emissive
Most commonly used pyrometer, the total radiation pyrometer, functions through both
infrared and visible radiation to sense heat on an element which produces electric signals. The
radiation passes through a lens and is connected to a heat sensing element. The sensing detector may
be a thermopile (most commonly used), a thin thermistor flake, or a resistance thermometer. Voltage
produced by the element is proportional to the intensity of the radiation from the target, which
The laws explored in this experiment are total radiation law and inverse square law.
Stefan-Boltzmann’s total radiation law determines the total radiant heat power emitted from a
surface, which is proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature [4]. This law applies to
black bodies and surfaces which absorb radiation. The total radiation intensity can be represented
mathematically by:
If T(target) is much greater than T(surrounding), then the mathematical expression can be
The inverse square law describes the light intensity is inversely proportional to the distance
squared from the radiation source [1]. A graphical representation of the inverse square law is
represented in Figure 2.
Overall, this experiment explores ways of determining filament temperatures of a light bulb
using an optical and total radiation pyrometer at various input voltages. Experimenters are to
familiarize themselves with the laboratory instruments used in the lab and obtain the ability to verify
stated mathematical laws. It is important to understand the usage of pyrometers and become familiar
with heat measurement instruments to enhance one’s understanding of process measurements in the
Table 1 shows the quantitative data for the total radiation law which is set at a distance of 22 cm.
radiation law.
From Figure 3, the slope of the linear line that displays the relationship between the current
−8
δ = 𝑆𝑡𝑒𝑓𝑎𝑛 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 5. 67 × 10
−8
𝑦 = 4𝑥 + 𝑙𝑜𝑔(5. 67 × 10 ) → 𝑦 = 4𝑥 − 16. 685
From the rearrangement and logarithmic calculation, it is clear that the slope must remain 4,
or in other words, the literature value of the slope is 4. In Figure 3, the slope is 4.48. The percentage
error is 12.04 %. The percentage error for the b value is 16.1 %. The percentage error is relatively
small so little deviation has occurred. This has assured that the data is precise. Overall, Figure 3
Table 1 shows the quantitative observations for the verification of inverse square law such as distance
22 9.59 0.002066
25 7.96 0.0016
28 7.25 0.001276
31 6.78 0.001041
34 6.12 0.000865
37 5.49 0.0007305
Figure 4 shows the linear relationship between current and temperature in regards to the total
radiation law.
From Figure 4, it is evident that the trendline is nearly a straight line which means that the
relationship between the current and the inverse of the distance squared is linear. Therefore, the
current is directly proportional to the inverse of distance squared. There are some deviations as
shown in Figure 4 not being completely linear. The reasons why there were deviations are discussed
The two radiation laws relevant to this experiment: Total Radiation Law and Inverse Square
Law were calculated and observed in order to understand the use of a pyrometer. The total radiation
is used for continuous, non-contact measurement of the temperature of a target. The relationship
between the logarithmic function of current versus the logarithmic function of temperature was
plotted, the graph displayed a linear plot. While the ‘variac’ setting is increased by a factor of 10, the
total radiation pyrometer was set at a distance of 22 cm. The current and temperature were steadily
increasing. When the logarithm of both parameters are taken, the plot also steadily increases. To find
the total radiation law of this experiment, the line of best fit function was used in order to find the
slope. The slope of this relationship was 4.4817. The target temperature was much greater than the
value of the temperature of the surroundings by 12.04%. Using the ‘Stefan Boltsman constant
−8
(5. 67 × 10 ), the equation of the line in the form of y=mx+b was calculated. The b value was
found to be -16.685. This gave a difference of -2.679. The percent error of the b function was found
to be 16.1%. Although the percentage error for the y-intercept and slope is greater than the scientific
error, it is less than 20 percent and confirms the Stefan-Boltzmann constant. Since the percentage
error is relatively small with some deviation, the data is proven to be accurate since they abide by the
For the Inverse Square Law plot, the current versus the inverse of the distance squared
displayed a slightly curved plot. The plot should yield a linear relationship, but this can be explained
by the sources of error. The law is verified as there are slight deviations to be accounted for in this
experiment. This can be explained as these pyrometers in particular are designed for measuring
thermal radiation in the visible spectrum. The temperature is measured based on the colour of visible
light they emit. Radiation pyrometers measure the temperature of an object from the radiation emitted
by the object. The variac setting was set at 90 while the distance was incremented by 3 cm. When the
distance was increased, the current began to decrease. Therefore, the intensity of radiation onto the
area is inversely proportional to the square of the distance between the area and the point source. The
slope from plotting the line of best fit is y = 0.0003x - 0.0012. This results in a slope closer to 0.There
are a few deviations in the values as from the distance of 28 cm to 34 cm, the plot takes a dip. This
can be explained by the distance being inversely proportional to the current. The radiation pyrometer
at a distance from the light bulb detects a weaker current as the distance is increased. Although the
plot is not 100% straight, the law can still be verified despite few outliers in the data provided.
This experiment was conducted to minimize any deviations from obtaining the results, but
there are sources of errors to take into account. The effect of the sources of error can be found by
analyzing the graphs. The optical pyrometer is a relatively precise instrument as there is room for
human error. The light emitted from the pyrometer is mainly observed by the human eye. This
pyrometer especially depends on the intensity of the light emitted by the sample being tested for
source and standard reference lamp. Moreover, environmental errors such as stability of the ground,
dust, smoke and thermal background radiation etc, contribute to the inaccuracy. The radiation
sensing element to produce an electrical signal proportional to intensity. The electrical signal is
converted into current. Both operate on the principle that the thermal radiation emitted from the
object is a function of its temperature. The radiation pyrometer is complex in nature because it has a
non-linear scale. There are possible errors due to the pressure intervening when radiation is absorbed.
The emissivity of the target material can also affect the significant digits since it was obtained to its
hundredths place. If the significant digits were rounded to its thousandths place, we would have
obtained an even more accurate result. Considering the systematic, environmental, and random
errors; the deviation from the data collected is justified. Thus, the data and results obtained verifies
Conclusion:
In this experiment, the pyrometer was used to determine the mathematical and graphical
relationships between the current and temperature as well as the current and the reciprocal of the
distance squared. In the first part of the experiment, the logarithmic values for current and
temperature were taken to observe a linear line. The slope of the graph (Figure 3) and the literature
slope of 4 are relatively close in value, verifying the total radiation law. In the second part of the
experiment, the current values and the inverse of the distance squared values were taken to give a
semi-linear line. It was not completely linear because there were some deviations; however, the data
is accurate, verifying the inverse square law. Furthermore, there are deviations in the data which are
results of systematic errors such as the limitation of the pyrometer, random error, and environmental
error such as temperature of the surroundings. In a broad view, the data and graphs were mostly
accurate and precise due to the fact that the percentage errors are less than 20 % and the R squared
value was extremely close to 1, indicating that the data points are in close proximity to one another.
References
[1] Process Measurements Laboratory Manual. Ryerson University, Toronto, CA, 2022, pp. 8-13.
[2] Elsevier B.V. , “Radiation Pyrometer”, Science Direct, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/engineering/radiation-pyrometer#:~:text=1.2.&text=Ra
diation%20pyrometers%20are%20usually%20used,is%20the%20disappearing%20filament%
20type.&text=With%20the%20screen%20in%20place,scale%20of%20temperatures%20is%2
0provided.
[3] Circuit Globe, “Optical Pyrometer”, Circuit Globe, 2022. [Online]. Available:
https://circuitglobe.com/optical-pyrometer.html#:~:text=Definition%3A%20The%20optical%
20pyrometer%20is,is%20placed%20inside%20the%20pyrometer.&text=Hence%20the%20
non%2Dcontact%20parameter%20is%20used%20for%20
measuring%20their%20temperature.
[5] Daedalon Corporation, “12 - Stephan’s Law for Black Body Radiation”, Daedalon Corporation,
http://sites.iiserpune.ac.in/~bhasbapat/phy221_files/StephansLaw.pdf
[6] Polytechnic Hub, “Advantages and Disadvantages of Optical Pyrometer”, Technical Editor,
17-Jul. 2017. [Online]. Available:
https://www.polytechnichub.com/advantages-disadvantages-optical-pyrometer/
https://www.polytechnichub.com/advantages-disadvantages-applications-radiation-pyrometer/
Appendix:
The following is the rearrangement of the total radiation law when the target temperature is
4
𝐼 = δ𝑇𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 → 𝑇𝑎𝑘𝑒 𝑎𝑙𝑙 𝑣𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛𝑡𝑜 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑚𝑖𝑐 𝑓𝑜𝑟𝑚 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝑢𝑠𝑒 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑎𝑟𝑖𝑡ℎ𝑚 𝑙𝑎𝑤𝑠
4
𝑙𝑜𝑔𝐼 = 𝑙𝑜𝑔δ + 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑇𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡 → 𝑙𝑜𝑔𝐼 = 𝑙𝑜𝑔δ + 4𝑙𝑜𝑔𝑇𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑒𝑡
𝑦 = 𝑎𝑥 + 𝑏 → 𝑦 = 4𝑥 + 𝑙𝑜𝑔δ
−8
δ = 𝑆𝑡𝑒𝑓𝑎𝑛 𝐵𝑜𝑙𝑡𝑧𝑚𝑎𝑛𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑛𝑡 = 5. 67 × 10
−8
𝑦 = 4𝑥 + 𝑙𝑜𝑔(5. 67 × 10 ) → 𝑦 = 4𝑥 − 16. 685
4.4817−4
% 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = 4
× 100 = 12. 04 %.
|−14.006−(−16.685)|
% 𝑒𝑟𝑟𝑜𝑟 = |−16.685|
= 16. 1%
𝐼1 = 3. 38 µ𝐴 → 𝑙𝑜𝑔 𝐼1 = 0. 5289
The following is the sample calculation for the inverse distance squared in Table 2:
1 1 1
𝑑1 = 22 𝑐𝑚 → 2 = 2 = 0. 002066 2
𝑑1 (22) 𝑐𝑚