Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Maraguinot
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION
The most commonly cited basis for devolution is that policymakers would be
closer to the people, which should result in a better match between policies and
programs and the needs and wants of the constituents; those governing will be
more flexible and responsive to the desires of the people. It is important because
it ensures that decisions are made closer to the local people, communities and
businesses they affect. Devolution will provide greater freedoms and flexibilities
at a local level, meaning councils can work more effectively to improve public
services for their area.
Most notable among these, insofar as social policy is concerned, was the transfer
to city and municipal governments of responsibility for primary health care and
social welfare services and the construction and maintenance of school buildings
used for primary education. What used to be the functions of the national
Department of Health, the Department of Social Welfare and Development and
the Department of Education were placed in the hands of city and municipal
governments. As a consequence of the devolution, city and municipal authorities
now have discretion over the number of resources to put into primary health care,
social welfare services and basic education facilities. In a way, devolution came
in the form of the decentralization of power and authority from central
government to local governments, thus the two terms will be used
interchangeably here, especially in reference to similar changes in other
countries. Devolution is offered by proponents as a mechanism for increasing
local decision-making and control of resources. Some point out that devolution
forms part of an approach in social policy and administration characterized by
increased market orientation and managerialism with the main objective of
increasing efficiency. The devolution granted local government units a substantial
amount of power and authority and this resulted in the financial and political
strengthening of a number of local governments. The Code provided sufficient
space and opportunity for local government units to transform themselves in the
areas of tax administration, budget management and local financing.
Understandably, the devolution provided more political power to local
government officials. This power, however, is not well distributed. Many local
chief executives, mayors as they are called, hold a substantial amount of power
at the local level, even in relation to the local legislative body.