Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This section discusses and describes the outcome from the data analysis which uses
T-test that produced the results from the two groups of samples, the control and
experimental group. In addition, this section will also imply the results whether the
neem tree extracts have a significant impact towards cabbage aphid control.
HYPOTHESIS
aphid population between the treatment group using Neem tree extracts and the
treatment group using Neem tree extracts is significantly different from the mean
reduction in the control group (no Neem treatment), indicating that Neem tree
A total of six (6) cabbages were tested to conduct this research, and were all
infested with aphids. Three (3) of each cabbage were being used as a controlled and
control and experimental group will both undergo a pre-test and post-test to show
significant difference and to know if neem tree extracts is effective on reducing the
cabbage aphids.
Table 1. Results during PRE-TEST of the Control Group Row 1
Cabbage 1 30
Cabbage 2 50
Cabbage 3 60
TOTAL: 140
Mean/Average: 46.67
Cabbage 4 40
Cabbage 5 70
Cabbage 6 50
TOTAL: 160
Mean/Average: 53.33
Cabbage 1 70
Cabbage 2 100
Cabbage 3 90
TOTAL: 260
Mean/Average: 86.67
Cabbage 4 10
Cabbage 5 20
Cabbage 6 15
TOTAL: 45
Mean/Average: 15.00
To obtain the significant difference of each group and to know whether the null and
alternative hypothesis is accepted or rejected we will use the value 0.05. (insert rrl)
In the table 5, the control group during pre-test has a F-value of 0.317. 0.317 > 0.05,
meaning, it accepts the null hypothesis and rejects the alternative hypothesis. In
addition, in the control group during post-test has a F-value of 0.043. 0.043 <
0.05 meaning it rejects the null hypothesis and accepts the alternative
hypothesis. The experimental group during pre-test has a F-value of 0.523. 0.523 >
0.05 meaning, it accepts the null hypothesis and rejects the alternative hypothesis. In
addition, in the experimental group during post-test has a F-value of 0.021. 0.021 <
0.05 meaning, it accepts the alternative hypothesis and rejects the null hypothesis.
In our discussion presented, the researchers can truly say that there is a significant
difference of the two groups: the experimental (with treatment) and control group (no
treatment) towards controlling aphid infestation on the cabbage. During its post-test
where intervention is being presented the (controlled group accepts the null
hypothesis and rejects the alternative hypothesis. While the experimental group
during post-test accepts the alternative hypothesis and rejects the null hypothesis.
This indicates that the two groups are significantly different with each other and
neem tree extracts can truly help and is effective towards controlling the aphid
infestation on cabbage.
In the study of (insert RRL) in our results here, it is the same where they examine the
In the data presented in the results and discussion, the use of neem tree extracts as
a pest control towards cabbage aphid infestation has a significant effect and can
truly help towards controlling aphids. With the significant difference of the two
groups: control (no treatment), experimental (with treatment) during the intervention
or the post-test, the neem tree extracts is a great way and has a big potential for
RECCOMENDATION