Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prabhavati Baskey
Course Outline
of
Family Law – I
For
BA/BCom/BSc/BBA/BSW, LLB
Faculty:
Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
Assistant Professor of Law
Gujarat National Law University
Email: pbaskey@gnlu.ac.in
Mob: 8128684322
Page 1 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
Page 2 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
The given course outline is tentative. The faculty member may modify it while preparing the
reference material and engaging the classes.
The teaching methodology of the subject will not necessarily be bound by the parameters
shown here.
Both faculty members and students may mould it according to needs as and when they arise
for a better and more progressive understanding of the subject in a flexible way.
Active and positive class participation is mandatory. Maintaining the dignity and decorum of
the class is equally mandatory. Once the class is begun, the students are not allowed to enter
the classroom.
The students are required to come to the class with the necessary homework, which will be
beneficial for positive participation in lectures.
Personal relationship is the most vital and bedrock of our societies. Family nurture children, help
to build strength, resilience and moral values in young people, and provide the love and
encouragement that helps them to lead fulfilling lives. In any society, the family is an important
unit and plays a crucial role in instilling values and teaching responsibilities. Children who grow
up in healthy families can create better relationships outside their families. Good relationships
also help in solving misunderstandings in the family, thus creating a stable unity. The Universal
Declaration of Human Rights proclaims that the family is ‘the natural and fundamental group
unit of society’. In recent decades, the approach pertaining to family relationship has undergone
and undergoing a radical change. In view of drastic changes in the approach of personal
relationship, the family and its various dimensions have become the concern of different
disciplines of study and research.
Family law is usually seen as the law governing the relationships between children and parents,
and between adults in close emotional relationships. These disciplines give attention to the
institution of family as the strength of a society to the largest extent centers upon the strength of
the family it has. Therefore, every society needs to give recognition and protection to this unit of
society by law. This course covers and shall enable the students to understand the core areas of
family law in India such as marriage, divorce, maintenance, adoption, custody, guardianship, etc.
This course includes an analytical approach and focus on the factors underlying development
and changing perspective of family law in India.
Page 3 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
2.0 Proposed Teaching Schedule
No. of Sessions
Module No. Modules
(Classes)
III.3.1*1.1 Introduction to Hindu and Muslim Law on Marriage 8
and Divorce
Total = ___54____
*
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester and ‘1’ stands for
the module number.
†
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester and ‘1’ stands for
the module number.
‡
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester and ‘1’ stands for
the module number.
§
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester and ‘1’ stands for
the module number.
**
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester and ‘1’ stands for
the module number.
††
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester and ‘1’ stands for
the module number.
‡‡
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester and ‘1’ stands for
the module number.
§§
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester and ‘1’ stands for
the module number.
Page 4 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
3.0 Detailed Course Outline
Family Law – I
Module- III.3.1*** 1.1 Introduction to Hindu and Muslim Law on Marriage and Divorce
Sessions: 8
Cases
➢ Mansi Khatri v. Gaurav Khatri, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 667, decided on
19.05.2023...
➢ Vishwa Lochan Madan v UOI, (2014 SC)
➢ Marggarate Pulparampil v Dr. Chacko Pulparampil, AIR 1970 Ker
➢ Anath Nath De v Sm. Lajjabati Devi, AIR 1959 Cal 778
➢ Boodapati Ankammav Boodapati Bamaneppa, (1937) 1 MLJ 192
➢ Venkatacharyulu v Rangacharyulu, (1890) 1 M.L.J. 85
➢ Khushalchand Lalchand v Bai Mani, (1886) I.L.R. 11 Bom. 247
➢ Brindabun Chandra Kurmokar v Chandra Kurmokar, (1885) I.L.R. 12 Cal. 140
➢ Amardeep Singh v. Harveen Kaur, (2017) 8 SCC 746
➢ Amit Kumar v. Suman Beniwal, 2021 SCC OnLine SC 1270.
➢ Sailesh v. Varun Sreenivasan 2023 SCC OnLine SC 544]
➢ Charan Singh v. State of Uttarakhand, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 454].
***
‘III’ stands for semester, ‘3’ stands for the order in which the course/paper appears in that semester, and ‘1’ stands
for the module number.
Page 5 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
Cases
➢ Ilavarasan v. State, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1120]...
Chand Patel v Bismillah Begum, 1 (2008) DMC 588 (SC) 183
➢ Masroor Ahmed v Delhi (NCT), 2008 (103) DRJ 137 (Del.) 200
➢ Seema v Ashwani Kumar, (2006) 2 SCC 578
➢ Asha Qureshi v Afaq Qureshi, AIR 2002 MP 263 33
➢ Shamim Ara v State of U.P., 2002 Cr LJ 4726 (SC) 195
➢ Danial Latifi v Union of India, (2001) 7 SCC 740 234
➢ Dr. Surajmani Stella Kujur v Durga Charan Hansdah, AIR 2001 SC 938 1
➢ S. Nagalingam v Sivagami, (2001) 7 SCC 487 4
➢ Lily Thomas v Union of India, AIR 2000 SC 1650 12
➢ Noor Saba Khatoon v Mohd. Quasim, AIR 1997 SC 3280
➢ Arvinder Singh Bagga v State of U.P, 1994 SCC (6) 565
➢ P. v K., AIR 1982 Bom. 400 37
➢ Pinninti Venkataramana v State, AIR 1977 AP 43 23
➢ Raghunath Gopal Daftardar v Vijaya Raghunath Daftardar, AIR 1972 Bom 132
➢ Yousuf Rawther v Sowramma, AIR 1971 Ker. 261 217
➢ Babui Panmato Kuer v Ram Agya Singh, AIR 1968 Pat. 190 47
➢ Bhaurao Shankar Lokhande v State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965 SC 1564 8
➢ Itwari v Asghari, AIR 1960 All. 684 227
➢ Ghulam Sakina v Falak Sher Allah Baksh, AIR 1950 Lah. 45 213
➢ Mt. Ghulam Kubra Bibi v Mohd. Shafi Mohd. Din, AIR 1940 Pesh. 2 181
Page 6 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
Cases
➢ Rajiv Tayal v. Union of India & Ors. 124 (2005) DLT 50
➢ Venkat Perumal v State of AP II(1998)DMC 52
➢ Neeraja Saraph v Jayant Saraph (1994) 6 SCC 46
➢ Kailashwati v AyudhiaParkash, 1977 C.L.J. 109 (P.& H.) 55
➢ Swaraj Garg v K.M. Garg, AIR 1978 Del. 296
➢ Saroj Rani v Sudarshan Kumar, AIR 1984 SC 1562
➢ T. Sareetha v Venkata Subbaiah, A.I.R. 1983 AP 356
➢ Smt. Harvinderkaur v Harmander Singh Choudhry, A.I.R.1984 Delhi 66,
➢ Dharmendra Kumar v Usha Kumar, 1977 AIR 2218,
➢ Geeta Lakshmi v G.V.R.K. Sarveswara Rao, AIR 1983 AP 111
Module- III.1.4. Dissolution of Marriage under Hindu, Muslim, Christian, Paris Laws
Sessions:8
▪ Theories of Divorce
▪ Nullity of Marriage: Grounds of Divorce.
▪ Bigamy as Ground of Divorce
▪ Judicial Separation
▪ Polygamy
▪ Alternate relief
▪ Restitution of Conjugal Rights
▪ Divorce by mutual consent
▪ Remarriage/ Divorced Persons When May Marry Again.
Cases
➢ Deepti Bhandari v Nitin Bhandari, (2012) 1 SCC 725
➢ Mohan Saili & Sonali Singh v Nil, 2010 (175) DLT 259.
➢ Manish Goel v Rohini Goel, (2010) 4 SCC 393
➢ Anil Kumar Jain v Maya Jain, (2009) 10 SCC 415
➢ Samar Ghosh v Jaya Ghosh, 2007 (3) SCJ 253 101
Page 7 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
Module – V. 1.5 Marriage and Matrimonial Relief under Muslim law Sessions: 6
Law
Cases
➢ Mangala Bhivaji Lad v Dhondiba Rambhau Aher, AIR 2010 Bom 122
➢ Minakshi Gaur v Chitranjan Gaur and Anr, AIR 2009 SC1377
➢ Rameshchandra Daga v Rameshwari Daga, (2005) 2 SCC 33
➢ Savitaben Sonabhai Bhatia v State of Gujarat & Ors., (2005) 3 SCC 636
➢ Lt Col Rarce Saharwat v Ujjawal Sahawat, (2002)1 HLR 336
➢ Padmja Sharma v Ratan Lal Sharma, AIR 2000 SC 1398
➢ Smt Pramila Bhatia v Vijay Kumar, AIR 2000 Raj 362
➢ Jasbir Kaul Sehgal v District Judge Dehradun, AIR 1997 SC 3397
➢ Pradeep v Sbailja Kapoor, AIR 1989 Del 10
➢ Rajesh Bhai v Shanta Bai, AIR 1982 BOM 231
➢ Preeti v Ravindra Kumar, AIR 1979 all 29
➢ Naurang Singh Chuni Singh v Smt. Sapla Devi, AIR 1968 All 412
➢ Prasanna Kr v. Sureshwari, AIR 1969 orissa 12
➢ Amar Kanta Sen v. Sovana Sen, AIR 1960 Cal. 438 159
▪ Adoption:
o Essentials of valid adoption with reference to the person adopted, the person
adopting and other conditions; Procedure;
o When adoption is complete;
o Effect of adoption;
o Right of adoptive parents to dispose of their property
▪ Inter-country adoption, CARA guidelines;
o Recognition of foreign adoptions; Adoption by foreign parents
▪ Guardianship under the Hindu and Muslim law, and under the Guardian and Wards
Act, 1890:
o Kinds of Guardians;
o Procedure for appointment of a guardian;
o Guardian’s powers over the person and property of children;
o Rights, obligations, duties; liabilities, disqualifications and disabilities of
guardians
▪ Powers of Court 5.
o Custody of Minor and Minor’s property;
o Powers of courts in matrimonial proceedings to pass orders about custody and
well-being of children
Cases
Page 9 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
➢ The Temple of Healing v. Union of India, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1590].
➢ Aparna Ajinkya Firodia v. Ajinkya Firodia, 2023 SCC OnLine SC 161, decided on
20.02.2023].
➢ Shabnam Hashmi v Union Of India & Ors., (2014) 4 Scc 1
➢ Kumar Sursen v State of Bihar, AIR 2008 Pat 24
➢ Brijendra v State of M.P., AIR 2008 SC 1058
➢ Child Welfare Committee v Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi and Ors., 152 (2008) DL T
586 Shrimati Asoka Mukherjee v Gandhi Das and Anr., (2002) 3 CAL LT 307
(HC)
➢ St. Theresa's Tender Loving Care Home, Hyd. v All Concerned and Ors., 2002 (2)
ALD 316
➢ Githa Hariharan v Reserve Bank of India, (1999) 2 SCC 228
➢ Ajay Bijli and Anr. v State and Anr., 1999 VIAD (Delhi) 574
➢ Dhanwanti Joshi v Madhav Unde (1998) 1 SCC 11
➢ R. Ashok and Anr. v R. Bhagavathi Ammal (Deceased) and Ors., (1993) 1
➢ Bholooram and Others v Ramlal and Others, 1989 JLJ 387
➢ Kuldeep Sidhu v. Chanan Singh, AIR 1989 P&H 103
➢ Babu Nanjappa v Arunkumar, AIR 1988 Kant 139
➢ Surinder Kaur Sandhu v. Harbax Singh Sandhu, AIR 1984 SC 122
➢ Lakshmi Kant Pandey v Union Of India, 1984 AIR 469, 1984 SCR (2) 795
➢ Dashrath Ramchandra v Pandu Chila, 1977 (79) BOM LR 426
➢ Duni Chand etc. v Paras Ram etc., AIR 1970 Delhi 202
Cases
➢ Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, AIR 2014 SC 2756
➢ Independent Thought v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Civil) No. 382 Of 2013 (Air 2006
Sc 2522)
➢ Joseph Shine v. Union of India, Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 194 Of 2017 29.
➢ Juveria Abdul Majid Patni v. Atifiqbal Mansoori and Another, Criminal Appeal No.
2069 of 2014 Decided on September 18,2014
➢ Mohd. Ahmed Khan v. Shah Bano Begum, (AIR 1985 SC 945 [LNIND 1985 SC
145], 954 : (1985) 2 SCC 556 [LNIND 1985 SC 145].)
➢ Narayan Ganesh Dastane v. Sucheta Narayan Dastane, A.I.R. 2014 S.C. 2957 46.
Naveen Kohli v. Neelu Kohli, AIR 2006 SC 1675
Page 10 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
Prescribed Readings
Recommended Readings
1. Kusum, Family law lectures: family lawI ( Lexis Nexis,New Delhi , 2003)
2. Bharihokes Neera, “Modern Hindu Law” 1st Edn., Delhi Law House, 2017
3. Myneni S R, Sripathi Dwarakanath, Ahmedullah Khan, Family laws in
India\Hindu law, Muslim law, Christian law and Parsi law (Ist Edition, Asia
Law House, Hyderabad, 2010)
4. Krishnamurthi Aiyar S, Law of Marriage Maintenance Separation and Divorce
(4th edn. Universal law publishing co. pvt. ltd, 2012) .
5. Saharay HK, Family law in India (Eastern law house, Kolkata, 2011)
6. Agnes Flavia, Family laws and constitutional claims (Vol. I, Oxford University
press, New Delhi , 2011)
7. Diwan Paras , Law of Marriage and Divorce (6th Edition, Universal Law
Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd, 2011) (ISBN : 978-93-5035-089-8).
8. Gandhi BM, Hindu Law (3rd edition, Eastern book company, reprinted 2011)
9. Saxena Poonam, Family Law Lectures: Family Law II (3rd edition, Lexis
Nexis, Butterworth’s, Wadhwa, Nagpur,2011) (ISBN: 9788180386763)
10. Desai Kumud, Indian Law Of Marriage And Divorce (8th edition, Lexis Nexis
, Butterworth’s, Wadhwa, Nagpur, 2011)(ISBN: 9788180386824)
11. Padma K P C, Rao T, Principles of family law-I (Alt publications, Hyderabad ,
2010) 20. Myneni SR, Hindu Law (Asia law house, Hyderabad, 2009) No.
0004870).
12. Misra Ranganath (Justice), Hindu Law & Usage(16th edition (Reprint 2009))
22. Pant P C, Law of Marriage, Divorce (4thed. Orient
Publishing Company, 2007) 23. Diwan Paras, Modern Hindu
Law (18th edition Allahabad law agency. 2007)
13. Narayana P S, (Justice)Law Relating to Christians in India. (1st edition, Gogia
law agency. 2007) 25. Menski Werner, Modern Indian Family Law (Routledge
publication, 2001)
14. Mulla, Principles of Mahomedan Law (LexisNexis Butterworths, Wadhwa,
Nagpur) 27. Ahmad Aquil, Mohammedan Law(revised by Prof. I.A. Khan,
Central law agency).
15. Halsbury`s laws of India (Vol. 26 family law-I, LexisNexis New Delhi, 2007).
16. Kusum, Cases and materials on family law (Universal Publishing House,
2003).
Page 12 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
Articles
2. Bhatia Gautam, “Triple talaq and the Constitution” The Hindu, 11 May
2017 .
6. Menski Werner “The Uniform Civil Code Debate in Indian Law: New
Developments and Changing Agenda” 9 German L.J. 211 2008
9. Singh Rakesh Kumar, Age of the parties to Mary : Some unsolved issues,
(August) AIR 2006, Pg 120.
11. Tyagi Anju, Cruelty – A Ground of Divorce, (October) AIR 2006 Page
153
12. Karin S.A., Family Court Amicus Curiae, (October) AIR 2006 Page 159
15. KatjuM J, The importance of Mitakshara in the 21st Century, AIR 2005
Journal 215 17. Bhattacharjee A M, Hindu Law and the Constitution,
2nd ed., Eastern Law House, 2005 18. Akthar Salim & Ali Mohd Wasim,
Repudiation of Marital Tie at the Instance of Muslim Wife: Misgiving
and Clarification, 2003 JILI 471-483.
16. Ahmad Furquan “Understanding the Islamic law of Divorce” ILI, Vol-
45, No-3 &4, Jul-Dec 2003, pp 484-508
Page 13 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
Legal texts:
Besides the foregoing broad teaching methodologies, the following techniques will also
be resorted to:
• Class-participation.
• Project-assignment, if needed.
Page 14 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
• Presentations by the students.
• Group discussion.
• Inviting visiting faculty/experts, if required.
• Use of teaching aids, such as, power point presentation.
Continuous Evaluation:
Mid-Term Test and End-Term Exam: As per the schedule declared by the
Examination Division.
Project/Test/Case Presentations: Dates will be announced in the classroom.
This course-outline is tentative. The faculty concerned may modify it while engaging
the classes.
• The teaching methodology of the subject will not necessarily be bound by the
parameters mentioned hereinabove.
• The faculty concerned may not necessarily follow the sequence of the modules, as
stated in this course outline. The sequence will be determined in accordance with the
need of the subject and its delivery.
• Active and positive class participation is mandatory. Maintaining the dignity and
decorum of the class is equally obligatory. Once the class is begun (after the attendance
Page 15 of 16
Semester: V. (2022 – 2027) Course: Famil Law – I Faculty: Dr. Prabhavati Baskey
is taken), the students are not allowed to enter the classroom.
• The students are required to come to the class with necessary homework and reading,
which will be helpful for positive participation in learning–teaching process.
• Prohibit procrastination of internal assessment and other duties assigned
• The students must keep themselves updated with the contents made available on the
• Google Classroom platform as well as on emails.
Page 16 of 16