You are on page 1of 74

Malnutrition and Transitions of Care

Between Health Care Settings


Friday, September 22, 2023 • 12:00 – 1:00 PM ET

WEBINAR ATTENDEE PACKET

Accreditation Information 2

How to Claim CE 3–4

Session Slides 5 – 64

ASPEN24 Opportunities 65 – 66

ASPEN Resources 67

Self-Assessment Q&A 68 – 74

Supported in part by
Nestlé Health Science
8401 Colesville Road, Ste 510, Policies and Information:
Silver Spring, MD 20910 Non-Commercialism. ASPEN subscribes to the Standards for Integrity
301-587-6315, and Independence in Accredited Continuing Education. ASPEN does
www.nutritioncare.org not provide programs that constitute advertisement or include
promotional materials. ASPEN does not endorse any products.
Malnutrition Awareness Week 2023: Malnutrition and Transitions
of Care Between Health Care Settings Privacy and Confidentiality. ASPEN respects the privacy of its
September 22, 2023, 12:00PM – 1:00PM Eastern Time members and customers. Companies that receive personal
Supported in part by Nestlé Health Science information from ASPEN to execute the business of ASPEN may use
information only for that purpose.
Course Goal and Target Audience: The American Society for
Enteral and Parenteral Nutrition (ASPEN) webinars are designed for Grievances. Grievances must be submitted in writing to Director of
dietitians, nurses, pharmacists, physicians, and researchers who Education and Research at ASPEN, 8401 Colesville Road, Ste 510,
practice the sciences of clinical nutrition and metabolic support. Silver Spring, MD 20910.
These programs will provide nutrition support professionals with
current and cutting-edge information in the field of clinical nutrition. Commercial Support and Sponsorship: This live activity was
supported in part by an educational grant from Nestlé Health Science.
Course Objectives:
1. Describe methods to identify and address gaps in care for Disclosures and Relevant Financial Relationships for Faculty and
hospitalized malnourished patients. Planning Committee Members
2. Identify valuable strategies and interventions healthcare
professionals can implement across health care settings to The following individuals have no relevant financial relationships with
support individuals with malnutrition. ineligible companies: Rose Ann DiMaria-Ghalili, Nina Rocca, Joy
Heimgartner, Terese Scollard, Monica Agarwal, Jaime Avila, Moriah
Successful Completion: CE credit must be claimed by October 18, Bellissimo, Blair Brown, Angela Ditucci, Silvia Figueiroa Da Cruz,
2023. To obtain credit for the webinars, attendees must participate in Laura Gearman, Kelly Green Corkins, Brandee Grenda, Holly
the entire live program and complete an evaluation in ASPEN’s Guzman, Mireille Hamdan, Lacey Harter, Joanna Helm-Cummings,
eLearning Center. Certificates can be printed or stored in the Leah Hoffman, Jane Hughes, Kristin Izzo, Madhu Jain, Candi Jump,
eLearning Center. ASPEN submits data as required to the CPE Amir Kamel, Sandra Kless, Rhone Levin, Juvy Martillos-Sy, Katie
Monitor for pharmacists. ASPEN submits physician earned CME credit Mathias, Shirley Mccloskey, Ciara Murabito, Victoria Pehling, Jana
to Pars. ASPEN does not submit data to any other credentialing Ponce, Ajanta Raman, Carol Rollins, Joel Rush, Adeeba Spann,
organization. Christopher Sprinzyk, Mary Pat Turon-Findley, Samantha VanAcker

Pharmacists and physicians, please note that ASPEN will upload ASPEN staff have no relevant financial relationships with ineligible
earned CE credit into the appropriate system within the required companies.
timeframe. Any credit not claimed by the deadline will not be entered.
Please provide your correct information when completing your Mary Petrea Cober: CAPS/Bbraun - consulting; Baxter – consulting.
evaluation and claiming your CE credit. ASPEN submits only the
information that is entered by the pharmacist or physician when credit Kathleen Eustace: Abbott, speaker, relationship ended.
is claimed and is not responsible for following up to obtain any
corrected information to ensure an error-free submission. Rachel Ludke: Baxter, advisory board, relationship ended.

Accreditation Statement Claudia Maza: Abbott, speaker.


In support of improving patient care, The
American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Jessica Monczka: Fresenius Kabi, consultant, relationship ended.
Nutrition (ASPEN) is jointly accredited by the
Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Alyssa Price: Abbott Nutrition, speaker.
Education (ACCME), Accreditation Council for
Pharmacy Education (ACPE), and the American Nurses Credentialing Ashlee Roffe: Baxter, speaker and consultant, relationship ended.
Center (ANCC), to provide continuing education for the healthcare
team. All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

ASPEN designates this live activity for a maximum of 1.0 AMA PRA Note: an ineligible company is one whose primary business is producing, marketing, selling,
re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients. For specific examples of
Category 1 Credits TM. Physicians should only claim credit ineligible companies visit accme.org/standards.
commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity.
Financial relationships are relevant if the following three conditions are met for the prospective
Pharmacists: ASPEN designates this activity for a maximum of 1.0 person who will control content of the education:
• A financial relationship, in any amount, exists between the person in control of
contact hours/0.1 CEUs. ACPE UAN: 2345-0000-23-139-L99-P. content and an ineligible company.
Knowledge activity. • The financial relationship existed during the past 24 months.
• The content of the education is related to the products of an ineligible company
with whom the person has a financial relationship.
Nurses: ASPEN designates this activity for 1.0 nursing contact hours.
ASPEN is approved as a provider of continuing nursing education by
the California Board of Nursing, provider number CEP3970.

Dietitians: ASPEN designates this activity for 1.0 CPEUs.

This activity was planned by and for the healthcare


team, and learners will receive (1) Interprofessional
Continuing Education (IPCE) credit for learning and
change.

2
How to Claim Your Webinar CE Credit

Deadline for claiming CE Credits: October 18, 2023

Step 1: Log into the ASPEN eLearning Center at https://nutritioncare.org/elearning.


(Your login is the same email and password you use for the main ASPEN website.)

*IMPORTANT NOTE: DO NOT LOG IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT FROM THE MAIN


ASPEN WEBSITE! You must log in through the eLearning Center using the link above.

Access Your Evaluation


Step 2: Click on the "My Account" button at the top of the screen.
Step 3: Click “Live Events” from the drop-down menu.
Step 4: Click “Review Event” under the appropriate event title.
Step 5: Click “Evaluations” in the menu box on the left side of screen.
Step 6: Click “Take Evaluation” under the appropriate event title.

Please note that you can only claim CE credit if you attend the live webinar broadcast.

Access CE Transcript
You must complete the “Overall Evaluation” to receive your course certificate

Step 2: Click on the "My Account" button at the top of the screen.
Step 3: Click “CE Transcript” from the drop-down menu.
Step 4: Click on the Event Title to view your CE credit.
Step 5: Click “Print Transcript” under the event title to print a copy of your CE transcript.

* Your CE transcript will be saved in your eLearning Center account.

3
3
Webinar Handout & Recording

Step 1: Log into the ASPEN eLearning Center at https://nutritioncare.org/elearning.


(Your login is the same email and password you use for the main ASPEN website.)

*IMPORTANT NOTE: DO NOT LOG IN TO YOUR ACCOUNT FROM THE MAIN


ASPEN WEBSITE! You must log in through the eLearning Center using the link above.

Access Handout and Webinar Recording


Step 2: Click on the "My Account" button at the top of the screen.
Step 3: Click “Archived Content” from the drop-down menu.
Step 4: Click “View Product” under the appropriate event title.
Step 5: Click on the Webinar Title.
• To listen to the recording, click inside the webinar player.
• To download the recording, click “Download MP3” on the right side of the screen.
• To download the handouts, click “Download Handout” on the right side of the screen.

* The webinar recording will be available in the eLearning Center within 3 business days
following the broadcast. All registered attendees will have access to the recordings for 1 year
after the end of the program. You cannot claim CE credit if you did not attend the live
webinar broadcast and only listened to the webinar recording.

4
4
NUTRITION CARE
IS A PATIENT RIGHT

nutritioncare.org/Malnutrition | #ASPENMAW23

Malnutrition and Transitions of Care


Between Health Care Settings
September 22, 2023 • 12:00 – 1:00 PM ET

Supported in part by
Nestlé Health Science

5
Using the Webinar Player

Control Panel is on the left. • Chat: Use chat to talk to other attendees
• The control panel will open to the chat screen by • Polling: If there are polls during the session.
default. To switch between Chat, Questions, or Click the “polling” icon to submit your answer
Resources, simply click the header to expand
your preferred section. • Resources: Download handouts from today’s
session
• Click the “X” on the left side of any header to
minimize the interactive elements of the player • Questions: Submit your questions to the faculty
at any time during the program
• To reopen the interactive elements, simply click
any header which will now be listed along the left • Notes: On the right side of the screen, you can
side of your webinar screen. take notes during the program. These notes will
be emailed to you following the session.

For technical support, use the Request Support button at the bottom left corner of the webinar player.

Moderator Faculty

Terese Scollard, MBA, RD, Rose Ann DiMaria-Ghalili, Nina Rocca, DCN, RDN, Joy Heimgartner, MS, RDN,
LD, FAND, PhD, RN, FASPEN, FAAN, LDN, FAND, CPT, CSO, LD,
Owner FGSA, Private Practice Owner, Registered Dietitian
My Surgery Plate, Portland, Professor of Nursing, Senior Prestige RD, LLC; Clinical Nutritionist (APII), Certified
OR Associate Dean for Research, Dietitian Specialist in Oncology, Blood
College of Nursing and Health BayCare Hospitals, and Bone Marrow Transplant,
Professions Clearwater, FL Assistant Professor of
Drexel University, Philadelphia, Nutrition
PA Mayo Clinic College of
Medicine and Science,
Rochester, MN

6
Malnutrition Across the Care
Continuum
R. DiMaria-Ghalili, PhD, RN, FASPEN, FAAN, FGSA
Professor of Nursing, Senior Associate Dean for Research
College of Nursing and Health Professions
Drexel University
Philadelphia, PA

Disclosure
• No commercial relationships to disclose.

7
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:
• Describe the relationship between U.S. demographic trends and
malnutrition across the care continuum.
• Discuss barriers and facilitators to promoting optimal nutrition care during
care transitions.
• Identify solutions to addressing malnutrition across the care continuum.

Source: National Population Projections, 2017


www.census.gov/programs-surveys/popproj.html

8
MALNUTRITION RISK FACTORS in OLDER ADULTS

• Physiological
• Chronic Conditions
• Medications
• Psychosocial
• Economic
• Environmental
• Dietary Intake

DiMaria-Ghalili, R. A., & Amella, E. (2005). Nutrition in Older Adults: Intervention and assessment can help curb the growing threat of malnutrition. AJN The American Journal of Nursing, 105(3),
40-50.

Nutrition and Functional Outcomes

Functional
Decline

• Risk Factors in older • Negative outcomes


adults • Weight loss
• Loss muscle mass
• Inadequate protein, • Poor recovery
energy, and/or • ↓ strength
micronutrient intake • ↓ power
• ↓ walking speed
• Impaired balance
Poor Nutritional • ↓ activity Disability
Status

FRAILTY
Adapted from: Sharkey, Ann NY Acad Sci, 1136: 210-217, 2008.

9
• Data source: 2010 Health Care Cost and • Data source: 2018 Health Care Cost and
Utilization Project Utilization Project
• Of the 39 million hospital discharges analyzed, • Of the 27.8 million hospital discharges
3.2% (1.2 million) had a clinical diagnosis of analyzed, 8.9% (2.5 million) had a clinical
malnutrition. diagnosis of malnutrition.
• The mean age of those with malnutrition was • The mean age of those with malnutrition was
64.8 years of age. 64.8 years of age.
• Older adults accounted for 58.3% of all • Older adults accounted for 59.5% of all
malnutrition diagnoses. malnutrition diagnoses.
• 41.9% were 65-84 years of age • 42.9% were 65-84 years of age
• 16.4% were 85 and older • 16.1% were 85 and older

10
Hospital Malnutrition Facts
Patients coded for malnutrition
Older adults with a malnutrition
tend to be 65 years and older,
diagnosis were more likely to
have higher infection rates, Weight loss increased risk of
be admitted to hospital from
longer lengths of stay, higher 30-day readmission in medical
SNF, and more likely to be
costs, higher rates of death, patients (Allaudeen et al., 2011)
discharged to SNF (DiMaria et
and higher usage of home care
al., 2014 )
(Corkins et al., 2014)

High prevalence of malnutrition


Failure to thrive/malnutrition Malnutrition and Posthospital
on hospital admission and
frequent reason for Syndrome “an acquired,
predischarge (31% and 36%
readmission in surgical patients transient period of vulnerability”
respectively) (van Vliet et al.,
(Kassin et al., 2012) (Krumholz et al., 2013)
2020)

Corkins, M. R., et al. (2014). Malnutrition diagnoses in hospitalized patients United States, 2010. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 38 (2), 186-195.
DiMaria-Ghalili, R.A., et al. (2014). A comparison of characteristics by age of hospitalized adults with a diagnosis of malnutrition: United States, 2010. The Gerontologist ,54 (Suppl. 2): 692.
Allaudeen N, et al. (2011). Redefining readmission risk factors for general medicine patients. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 6(2):54–60.
Kassin MT, et al. (2012). Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission among general surgery patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons; 215(3):322–330.
Krumholz HM. (2013). Post-hospital syndrome—An acquired, transient condition of generalized risk. New England Journal of Medicine, 368(2):100–102.
van Vliet, I. M., Gomes-Neto, A. W., de Jong, M. F., Jager-Wittenaar, H., & Navis, G. J. (2020). High prevalence of malnutrition both on hospital admission and predischarge. Nutrition, 77, 110814.

Nutrition Risk in Community -Dwelling Older Adults


Total Normal At Risk Malnourished
Age n (%)
65-74 16,485,371 (52.4) 11,857,985 (55.3) 3,893,416 (47) 733,970 (42)
75-84 11,097,355 (35.3) 7,468,497 (34.9) 2,948,565 (35.6) 680,293 (39)
85+ 3,881,103 (12.3) 2,099,121 (9.8) 1,450,174 (17.5) 331,808 (19)

*Weighted sample, P <.01

Data Source: NHATS 2017


DiMaria-Ghalili, R. A., Granche, J., Coates, M., Hathaway, Z., & Sefcik, J. (2020). Prevalence of Malnutrition in
a National Sample of Older Adults Residing in Community or Residential Care: NHATS 2017. Innovation in
Aging, 4(Suppl 1), 793. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igaa057.2874

11
Gaps: How prevalent is malnutrition in older
adults across the care continuum? What are
the facilitators and barriers for best treatment
options during care transitions?

• Older adults are at risk for malnutrition across


the continuum of care.
• Great emphasis on malnutrition risk in acute
care settings (hospitals).
• Transitions from hospital to home are high risk
periods.
• Older adults are living longer and may need
different levels of care and supervision over
their lifetime.
• Gaps in understanding the presence of
malnutrition across the care continuum and
best interventions to promote positive health
outcomes and quality of life.

https://www.wthr.com/article/news/local/elderly-man-calls-911-because-hes-hungry-and-dispatcher-brings-him-food/531-9d899f9b-
6640-4bb4-91f5-8d36b2ededbb

Prevalence of Malnutrition at Care Transitions

• Not documented at hospital discharge


• Not reported in current CMS OASIS
(Outcomes and Assessment
Information Set)
• Few prevalence studies in the U.S. at
care transitions

12
Nutrition Screening At Hospital Discharge
Online Survey of Nurses’ Nutritional Care Practices in the United States
across care settings (DiMaria-Ghalili et al., 2017)

• N=174 hospital or long-term acute care RNs


• 86.6% reported conducting a nutrition screen on admission
• 38.4% reported re-evaluating nutrition at discharge

DiMaria-Ghalili, R. A., Miller, E., Chen, C., & Hathaway, Z. (2017). A Survey of Nurses' Nutritional Care Practices. Nursing Research, 66, 2, E89-E89.

Malnutrition and Hospital Discharge Nutrition Care


Instructions
Brooks et al (2019) reviewed EMR discharge nutrition care instructions
provided to adult patients (N=76) identified as malnourished by RD in
US over a 4-month period
• 6.6% received discharge instructions to consume ONS
• 47.4% received general diet instructions that did not address malnutrition
• 44.8% received inappropriate instructions to limit caloric intake
• Need for clinician education and redesign of nutrition care options in EMR

Brooks, M., Vest, M. T., Shapero, M., & Papas, M. (2019). Malnourished adults’ receipt of hospital discharge nutrition care instructions: a pilot study. Journal of Human Nutrition
and Dietetics, 32(5), 659-666

13
Malnutrition Patient and Caregiver Study (August 2015)
About the Data
The Gerontological Society of America’s National Academy on an Aging Society commissioned a
national study about older adult malnutrition among individuals who were self-identified as adults or
nonpaid family caregivers of an older adult, age 65 years or older. The electronic survey was e-mailed
to a sample of 75,000 potential respondents from July 23 to August 3, 2015. The sample consisted of
adults age 18 years or older in the United States. Participants in this study were provided through the
Harris Panel, including members of its third-party panel providers. The survey yielded a total of 1,035
responses, which included 529 responses among adults and 506 responses among family caregivers.
The data were weighted to be representative nationwide by age, sex, region, education, income, and
race.

Read more at https://www.geron.org/programs-services/alliances-and-multi-stakeholder-


collaborations/malnutrition
©The Gerontological Society of America National Academy on an Aging Society Malnutrition Study

The Gerontological Society of America; National Academy on an Aging Society. Profiles of an Aging Society: What We Know and Can Do About Malnutrition. Washington, DC: The Gerontological
Society of America; Fall 2015.

Patient “Transition” Perspectives Total


Response
Yes

Inpatient hospital stay in the last 12 months 1035 12%


Asked any questions about your appetite, diet, weight, or nutrition on admission 126 65%
or other times during hospital stay
Received info about appetite, diet, weight, or nutrition at DC 126 33%
Referred to a dietitian/nutritionist /diabetes educator when DC 126 17%
Referred/enrolled to home meal delivery program upon DC 126 15%

Referred/enrolled to meals at community or senior center upon DC 126 12%


Referred/enrolled in SNAP upon DC 126 24%

Received educational materials on diet/nutrition info upon DC 126 33%

Recommended an oral nutrition supplement upon DC 126 18%


DC: discharge. SNAP: Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly known as food
stamps.

©The Gerontological Society of America National Academy on an Aging Society Malnutrition Study

14
Caregiver “Transition” Perspectives Total
Response
Yes

Was older adult (65 and older) you care for hospitalized in last 5 years? 119 72%
Was the older adult asked any questions about their appetite, diet, weight, or 86 62%
nutrition on admission or other times during hospital stay?
Were you or other family members given any information about the appetite, diet, 86 55%
weight, or nutrition of the older adult for whom you care when he/she was DC ?
Referred to a dietitian/nutritionist /diabetes educator when DC 126 17%

©The Gerontological Society of America National Academy on an Aging Society Malnutrition Study

The Gerontological Society of America; National Academy on an Aging Society. Profiles of an Aging Society: What We Know and Can Do About Malnutrition. Washington, DC: The Gerontological Society of America;
Fall 2015.

Caregiver “Transition” Perspectives (n=119)


What specific nutrition actions would be the most helpful for you and the older adult in your care?
(top 3 responses)
• Educational resources-44%
• Coverage reimbursement of oral nutritional supplements-40%
• Referral to community nutrition resources-33%
Which community nutrition resources does the older adult you care for currently use?
• None of the above-56%
• Home delivered meals-21%
• Meals at a community or senior center-20%
• SNAP-19%
• Food assistance programs (food banks, food pantries, Senior Farmer’s Market)-16%
• Local transportation services to and from nutrition programs-15%
Which community nutrition resources would you like the older adult to use?
• None of the above-40%
• Home delivered meals-30%
• Meals at a community or senior center-23%
• SNAP-28%
• Food assistance programs (food banks, food pantries, Senior Farmer’s Market)-23%
• Local transportation services to and from nutrition programs-24%
©The Gerontological Society of America National Academy on an Aging Society Malnutrition Study

15
Malnutrition Patient and Caregiver Study: Take Away
Points
Strengths:
• Weighted representative nationwide sampling plan (age,
gender, region, education, income, race)
• Unique “end-user” patient and caregiver perspective of
nutrition during and after hospitalization
Weaknesses:
• Not known what percentage of patients were
malnourished.

Global Perspectives
Nutrition and Care Transitions

16
Scandinavian Discharge Survey
Survey of nutrition routines at discharge (MD and RN)
• Weight at discharge <25%
• Evaluation of nutrition status at discharge <20%
• Nutrition regimens started in hospital included in discharge summaries <63%

Pohju, A., Beck, A. M., Belqaid, K., & Rasmussen, H. H. (2018). Changes in nutritional routines at discharge in Scandinavia during a 10-year period: A follow-up survey. Clinical
nutrition ESPEN, 28, 148-152.

Norway: Patient and Family Caregivers’ Perspectives


Hestevik et al (2020) qualitative study with 15 older patients with
documented risk of malnutrition or malnourishment and family
caregivers’ post-discharge in Norway.

Themes:
• Comprehensive approach to nutritional care
• Non-individualized nutritional care at home (viewed as problematic)
• Lack of mutual comprehension and shared decision making
• Role of family caregivers

Hestevik, C. H., Molin, M., Debesay, J., Bergland, A., & Bye, A. (2020). Older patients’ and their family caregivers’ perceptions of food, meals and nutritional care in the transition
between hospital and home care: a qualitative study. BMC nutrition, 6, 1-13.

17
Israel: Adherence to Dietary Regimen Post-Discharge
• Ginzburg et al. (2018) prospective study in Israel
≫Older adults treated with oral nutrition supplement (ONS) and discharged with dietary
recommendations
≫Followed up for adherence 3 months

• Barriers to adherence:
≫GI symptoms
≫Lack of knowledge of purpose of ONS
≫No prescription for ONS.

Ginzburg, Y., Shmilovitz, I., Monastyrsky, N., Endevelt, R., & Shahar, D. R. (2018). Barriers for nutritional care in the transition from hospital to the among older patients. Clinical
nutrition ESPEN, 25, 56-62.

Belgium & Denmark: Care Transition Barriers


Education: individual knowledge and attitude, lack of training and
experts

Organization: lack of communication from hospital on reason for


nutritional therapy, goals and follow-up; lack of common guidelines and
instructions

Economic: Short hospital stay; therapy not started at discharge

Geurden, B., et al. (2015). Prevalence of ‘being at risk of malnutrition and associated factors in adult patients receiving nursing care at home in Belgium. International Journal of
Nursing Practice, 21(5), 635-644.
Holst, M., & Rasmussen, H. H. (2013). Nutrition therapy in the transition between hospital and home: an investigation of barriers. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism, , Article ID
463751, http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/463751

18
Canada: Consensus-based nutrition care pathways for hospital-
to-community transitions and older adult sin primary and
community care (Keller et al., 2022)
Reviewed best-practices for nutrition care and clinical guidelines; draft care
pathways developed by the Primary Care Working Group of the Canadian
Malnutrition Task Force, stakeholders (N=21) reviewed and revised.

Barriers and facilitators to primary care and community nutrition care


practices:
• Nutrition care plan at hospital discharge
• Nutrition risk screening
• Weight monitoring
• Appetite monitoring
• Dietitian referral
• Educational resources
• Community services

Keller, H., Donnelly, R., Laur, C., Goharian, L., & Nasser, R. (2022). Consensus‐based nutrition care pathways for hospital‐to‐community transitions and older adults in primary
and community care. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 46(1), 141-152.

Moving Forward

19
INTERVENTIONS
• Education
• Increase Intake
≫TPN, tube feeding
≫Therapeutic Diet
≫Oral Nutritional Supplements
≫Home Delivered Meals
≫Congregant Meals
• Social Services
≫Homemaker support: feeding, shopping, cooking
≫Transportation Services
≫SNAP

Models of Care
• Integrate nutritional risk assessment into predictive models to
determine levels of intensity of nutritional care post-discharge
≫High-risk: intervention delivered by dietitian
≫Medium-risk: intervention delivered by nurses
≫Low-risk: intervention delivered by social worker or lay-health
worker
• Identify and review programs instituted by hospitals to address
nutrition needs post-discharge
≫Common elements
≫Program costs
≫Cost savings
≫Sustainability
≫Patient outcomes

DiMaria-Ghalili, R.A. in National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Meeting the Dietary Needs of Older Adults: Exploring the Impact of the Physical, Social, and Cultural Environment: Workshop
Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/23496.

20
Summary (PIER)
Policy: Advocate for practice change--malnutrition screening at discharge and
upon admission to home care

Interventions: Implement appropriate transition interventions, recognize the


importance of continued monitoring. Align with Food is Medicine opportunities.

Educate: Health care professionals about the importance of nutrition screening


during care transitions

Research: Most effective interventions to promote positive outcomes and


improved recovery in older adults

Nutrition Curing Care Transitions

IMPOSSIBLE

21
Nutrition Curing Care Transitions

IMPOSSIBLE

Learning Assessment Question 1

Malnutrition assessment at hospital discharge is a


standard aspect of care in the United States?
A. True
B. False

22
Learning Assessment Answer 1

Malnutrition assessment at hospital discharge is a


standard aspect of care in the United States?
A. True
B. False

Learning Assessment Question 2

Older adults are at risk for malnutrition across the care


continuum?
A. True
B. False

23
Learning Assessment Answer 2

Older adults are at risk for malnutrition across the care


continuum?
A. True
B. False

References List
1. Allaudeen N, et al. (2011). Redefining readmission risk factors for general medicine patients.
Journal of Hospital Medicine, 6(2):54–60.
2. Brooks, M., Vest, M. T., Shapero, M., & Papas, M. (2019). Malnourished adults’ receipt of hospital
discharge nutrition care instructions: a pilot study. Journal of Human Nutrition and Dietetics, 32(5),
659-666 .
3. Corkins, M. R., et al. (2014). Malnutrition diagnoses in hospitalized patients United States, 2010.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 38 (2), 186-195.
4. DiMaria-Ghalili, R.A., et al. (2014). A comparison of characteristics by age of hospitalized adults
with a diagnosis of malnutrition: United States, 2010. The Gerontologist ,54 (Suppl. 2): 692.
5. DiMaria-Ghalili (2016). Nutrition During Care Transitions in: Meeting The Dietary Needs of Older
Adults: Exploring the Impact of Physical, Social, and Cultural Environment. Workshop Summary.
Washington, DC: National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, Medicine.
6. DiMaria‐Ghalili, R. A. (2014). Integrating nutrition in the comprehensive geriatric
assessment. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 29(4), 420-427
7. DiMaria-Ghalili, R. A., Miller, E., Chen, C., & Hathaway, Z. (2017). A Survey of Nurses' Nutritional
Care Practices. Nursing Research, 66, 2, E89-E89.
8. DiMaria-Ghalili, R. A., Granche, J., Coates, M., Hathaway, Z., & Sefcik, J. (2020). Prevalence of
Malnutrition in a National Sample of Older Adults Residing in Community or Residential Care:
NHATS 2017. Innovation in Aging, 4(Suppl 1), 793.

24
References List Cont.
9. Geurden, B., et al. (2015). Prevalence of ‘being at risk of malnutrition and associated factors in
adult patients receiving nursing care at home in Belgium. International Journal of Nursing
Practice, 21(5), 635-644.
10. Ginzburg, Y., Shmilovitz, I., Monastyrsky, N., Endevelt, R., & Shahar, D. R. (2018). Barriers for
nutritional care in the transition from hospital to the among older patients. Clinical nutrition, 25, 56-
62.
11. Guenter P, Abdelhadi R, Anthony P, et al. (2021). Malnutrition diagnoses and associated
outcomes in hospitalized patients: United States, 2018. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 36(5):957-
969.
12. Hestevik, C. H., Molin, M., Debesay, J., Bergland, A., & Bye, A. (2020). Older patients’ and their
family caregivers’ perceptions of food, meals and nutritional care in the transition between hospital
and home care: a qualitative study. BMC Nutrition, 6, 1-13.
13. Holst, M., & Rasmussen, H. H. (2013). Nutrition therapy in the transition between hospital and
home: an investigation of barriers. Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism,
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/463751
14. Kassin MT, et al. (2012). Risk factors for 30-day hospital readmission among general
15. surgery patients. Journal of the American College of Surgeons; 215(3):322–330.
16. Keller, H., Donnelly, R., Laur, C., Goharian, L., & Nasser, R. (2022). Consensus‐based nutrition
care pathways for hospital‐to‐community transitions and older adults in primary and community
care. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 46(1), 141-152.

References List Cont.


17. Krumholz HM. (2013). Post-hospital syndrome—An acquired, transient condition of generalized risk. New
England Journal of Medicine, 368(2):100–102.
18. Pohju, A., Beck, A. M., Belqaid, K., & Rasmussen, H. H. (2018). Changes in nutritional routines at discharge in
Scandinavia during a 10-year period: A follow-up survey. Clinical nutrition ESPEN, 28, 148-152.
19. Sattler, E.L.P., et al. (2015). Factors associated with inpatient hospital (re)admissions in medicare beneficiaries
in need of food assistance. Journal of Nutrition in Gerontology and Geriatrics, 34, 228-244.
20. Sharkey JR. (2008). Diet and health outcomes in vulnerable populations. Ann NY Acad Sci., 1136: 210-217.
21. The Gerontological Society of America; National Academy on an Aging Society. Profiles of an Aging Society:
What We Know and Can Do About Malnutrition. Washington, DC: The Gerontological Society of America; Fall
2015.
22. van Vliet, I. M., Gomes-Neto, A. W., de Jong, M. F., Jager-Wittenaar, H., & Navis, G. J. (2020). High prevalence
of malnutrition both on hospital admission and predischarge. Nutrition, 77, 110814.

25
Implementation of a Transitions of Care
Nutrition Intervention
for Malnourished Patients

Nina Rocca, DCN, MS, RD, LDN, FAND


Clinical Dietitian
Food and Nutrition
BayCare Hospitals
Clearwater, Florida
Research completed at Lawrence General Hospital, Massachusetts

Disclosure
• No commercial relationships to disclose.

26
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:
• Understand the burden of malnutrition in relation to hospital readmission and
nutrition status
• Understand existing gaps in transitions of care systems for malnourished
patients
• Identify valuable strategies and interventions RDNs and other health
professionals can implement across health care settings to support patients with
malnutrition.

Burden of Malnutrition on Health Outcomes

Prevalent in 20-50% of hospitalized and community dwelling patients


Tied to poor health outcomes, 1.9 times longer hospital stays, frequent hospital readmission
30-day all cause readmission was nearly 50% higher among patients with malnutrition
Billions of dollars in estimated annual costs for older adults with malnutrition
AND Supports the Medical Nutrition Therapy (MNT) Act to include malnutrition coverage

Currently, Medicare does not provide MNT reimbursement for malnutrition

Valladares 2018, ASPEN, AHRQ, Mogensen 2015, Heersink 2010, White 2012, Alberda 2006, AND MNT Act, CMS Final Rule.

27
ASPEN Malnutrition Solution Center Infographic

ASPEN Malnutrition Solution Center Infographic

28
Transitions of Care

Safe transitions across levels of care and different care settings

Reduces hospital readmissions, Improve health outcomes

JCAHO* & CMS* requires nutrition screening, not discharge planning

Nutrition is often missing from documentation across settings

Missing Information, inconsistent care, poor health outcomes

*Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO)


*Centers for Medicare & Medicare Services
CMS 2020, JCAHO 2012, Valladares 2020, Baker 2005, Mogensen 2015, Heersink 2010.

Literature Review Summary

29 studies included in the literature review

< 18 utilized dietitians as part of transitions of care


interventions
Outcomes of Interest:

• Hospital readmissions (< 30 days from discharge)


• Nutrition status (weight, and nutrient intake)

Population of interest:

• Adults (primarily older-adults > 65-years old)


• At risk for malnutrition or diagnosed with malnutrition

29
Previous Research Findings
Study Type Intervention Findings References

Dietitians establish individualized care (4) Found significant nutrition improvements Endvelt 2011, Beck 2012, Beck
(4) RCTs plans and be involved in post- Hospital readmission did not differ 2015, Terp 2018
discharge follow up.
Dietitians or staff to provide (4) Found significant nutrition improvements (Feldblum 2011, Mudge 2012,
(15) Mixed- personalized recommendations; ONS, These studies did not look at hospital Hamirudin 2017, Vearing 2019)
Methods meal delivery programs, and nutrition readmissions TenCate 2020, Young 2018
education during hospital D/C planning (3 of 5) Found significant nutrition (Buys 2017, Beck 2012,
and followed at home improvements Reinders 2019)
Allmark 2020, Chareh 2021
(3 of 6) Found less hospital readmissions (Siriam 2017, Mullin 2019, Sulo
2020)
Buys 2017, Beck 2012, Siegel
2018
Nursing staff to provide nutrition (8 of 10) Found readmissions to be (Verhaegh 2014, Kim 2015, Low
(10) Other information post discharge, via phone significantly less 2015, Kansagara 2016, Finlayson
Studies calls and home visits to address These studies did not look at nutrition status 2018, Conroy 2020, Facchinetti
medical and nutrition concerns 2020)
Englander 2014, Aboumatar 2019,
Ohuabunwa 2021

Summary of Gaps Across Healthcare Setting

Screening for malnutrition has become common practice in the hospital

Many facilities lack a malnutrition policy to identify and treat malnutrition

Malnutrition and nutrition documentation missing from discharge planning

Lack of communication among staff from one setting to another

30
Development and Implementation
of the Research Study

Purpose
• Utilize a process evaluation to investigate if a case management / nursing
TOC frameworks can be adapted to develop and implement a successful
TOC nutrition intervention.
• Utilize an outcomes evaluation to determine if the TOC nutrition
intervention, adapted from a case management / nursing TOC framework,
was successful.

31
Methods: Study Design
Study Design Two part; Process Evaluation & Outcomes Evaluation, Quasi-experimental

Length of the Study 6 months from August 2021 – January 2022

5-week Transitions of Care Nutrition Intervention led by an RD including (1)


Intervention inpatient visit prior to discharge, (4) follow-up phone calls to address nutrition
and medical concerns
Monitor the implementation process (CDC Process Evaluation)
Data Collection (Part 1) Tools: Qualitative Tools: Checklists, Interaction Log, Process Evaluation
Questionnaires to track each patient interaction, Staff Interviews
Evaluate the implementation process (CDC Evaluation process)
Data Collection (Part 2) Outcomes Measured: *Unplanned hospital readmissions < 30 days
*Nutrition Status and *Weight using the PG-SGA standardized tool, & body scale

Analyze outcomes: hospital readmissions number, nutrition status; food intake


Analyze
and body weight

CDC Web site; Types of Evaluations


https://www.cdc.gov/std/Program/pupestd/Types of Evaluation.pdf

Methods: Setting & Participants


Setting Lawrence General Hospital (LGH)

Population of interest Hospitalized adult patients identified with Malnutrition

Comparison Group: Chart review May 2019 – November 2019 (n=137)


Comparison Group
*to establish a readmission number

Intervention Group Recruitment: Convenient Sampling from July 2021-


January 2022 Clinical RDs and MDs identify patients with malnutrition
Recruitment
Clinical RDs and MDs identify patients with malnutrition
The TOC RD visited patients, who met inclusion criteria, to enroll them

Sample Size (Estimate 120 participants to meet 80% Power) *Only 21 were enrolled*

LGH Web site: https://www.lawrencegeneral.org/

32
9/22/2023

Data Analysis Summary


• Patient data remained secure
• Mixed-methods were utilized
• Nonparametric t-test used for scale/ratio data
• Pearson’s chi-square test for nominal data
• No missing data – small samples size
• All p-values < .05 are taken as statistically significant
• Statistical Software: IBM SPSS version 26.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY)

Transitions of Care Nutrition Intervention


• Length of the intervention: A 5-week intervention for each patient
• Including 4 interactions

1. In-person interview & individualized nutrition plan “pre”

2. Phone call during week 1 from hospital discharge

3. Phone call during week 3 post-discharge

4. Phone call during week 5 post-discharge “post”

33
Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA)

PG-SGA. Pt-Global Web site. 2014. http://pt-global.org/?page_id=13

Results and Discussion

34
Demographics (n=21)

• Age: Average 67 years old


• Gender: 50% Male/ 50% Female
• Language: English & Spanish (4%)
• Race/Ethnicity: Primarily American and Dominican
• Malnutrition Severity & Etiology: Equally Distributed
• Medical Diagnoses

Outcome: Number of Readmissions


Unplanned hospital readmissions < 30 days from discharge

Readmission Status
Group 1: Groups 3 and 4:
Comparison All patients
Group enrolled in the
study
(n=) (n=137) (n=21) p-value
Readmitted < 30 48 (35%) 6 (28.5%) .561
days (Yes) No difference between groups!
Not readmitted 89 (65%) 15 (71.5%)

*p-value based on Pearson’s Chi-Square

35
Outcome: Nutrition Status
Outcomes: Weight on a scale, PG-SGA weight & nutrition scores (Page 1)

Variable Pre- Post- Statistical Effect


Intervention Intervention Output Two- size
Median (IQR) Median (IQR) sided p
(n=13) (n=13) value*

Weight (pounds) 142.1 (50.80) 141.4 (60.75) .552 -.17


Food Intake 2 (7) 0 (1.50) .012 -.70
Score Range 0 – 14 Food Intake & Total Scores Significantly Improved!
Total PGSGA 14 (14.50) 5 (6) .010 -.72
Score Range 0 - 33
*p value based on Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test, positive ranks (nonparametric)

Additional Findings
Food Insecurity
Do they have trouble shopping, cooking, or preparing meals?
Yes - 8 out of 21 (38%) report trouble with at least one

Did patients need additional services?


Yes - Elder services, food banks, meal delivery programs (Meals
on Wheels, Community Servings), oral nutrition supplements
Compliance
• Participants (n=21) were most compliance during week 1 (76%)

Were participants satisfied?


• Overall feedback was satisfied with the intervention

36
Hospital Staff Focus Group (Barriers to success)

(1) Lack of communication and understanding among all staff regarding the study

(2) Staff needed more flyers, emails and conversations

(3) Clear communication and documentation is needed in the EMR

(4) Lack of time, rushed to complete nursing interventions often putting nutrition aside

(5) Shorten the time spent during the initiation interview

(6) The pandemic created many barriers; Restrictions on discharge planning meetings

(7) Staff identified that nutrition is important, but whose role it is to address it, is unclear

Strengths & Limitations

Strengths: Challenges/ Limitations:


• Broad data collection • Subjective data collection by the
• Less expensive researcher, at risk for bias
• Evaluates “real world” effectiveness • TOC RD is the primary researcher
• Generalizable to a population • Non-randomized sample
• Previous implementation research • Bias may weaken internal validity
• Hospital in agreement • Limited ability to conclude an
• Expand Research in TOC association or “cause and effect”
• CDC Framework • Pandemic
• Small Sample Size

Schweizer 2016, Zoellner 2017, Miller 2020.

37
Results Summary
Readmissions
Hospital Readmissions were not significantly lower in the intervention
group (n=21) compared to the comparison group (n=137), p = .516

Weight Change
Weight did not improve among participants (n=13) from before to after the
TOC nutrition intervention (p = .552)

Nutrition Status
Participants (n=13) PG-SGA Food Intake scores (p = .012) and Total PG-
SGA score (p = .010) representing malnutrition risk significantly improved
by the end of the TOC Nutrition Intervention

38
Was the study a success?

Challenging to say the implementation was successful due to barriers

• Multiple barriers and potential patients were not included

• The Sample Size was not met

• Intervention – success on an individual level – improving food intake

• Mixed outcomes; readmissions rates were not better; food intake was better

Practice Implications and Forward Thinking


Transitions of Care needs to include Nutrition Interventions led by RDs

Identified gaps in communication among staff and address them

Opportunity to further educate health professionals about Malnutrition

Discuss hospital staff perspectives on the malnutrition processes

Help find solutions to bridge the gaps in care from hospital to home

Standardization for analyzing readmission rates is needed

Exciting opportunity for nutrition professionals to be involved in

Establish a Malnutrition Quality Improvement Project at your facility

39
Learning Assessment Question 1

Hospital Remission is how much higher when patients have


malnutrition than those without?
A. 4%
B. 20%
C. 50%
D. 75%

Learning Assessment Answer 1

Hospital Remission is how much higher when patients have


malnutrition than those without?
A. 4%
B. 20%
C. 50%
D. 75%

40
Learning Assessment Question 2

When reviewing previous research, transitions of care


interventions that involved dietitians found what to improve?
A. Improved blood work
B. Nutrition status
C. Infection Rate
D. Hospital Length of stay

Learning Assessment Answer 2

When reviewing previous research, transitions of care


interventions that involved dietitians found what to improve?
A. Improved blood work
B. Nutrition status
C. Infection Rate
D. Hospital Length of stay

41
Learning Assessment Question 3

When it comes to determining national unplanned


readmission rates related to malnutrition, what is missing?
A. A staff member who is responsible for tracking data
B. A standard tool to measure and track readmissions
C. Patients not understanding they should avoid readmission
D. Primary care doctors telling their patients to go to the hospital

Learning Assessment Answer 3

When it comes to determining national unplanned


readmission rates related to malnutrition, what is missing?
A. A staff member who is responsible for tracking data
B. A standard tool to measure and track readmissions
C. Patients not understanding they should avoid readmission
D. Primary care doctors telling their patients to go to the hospital

42
Learning Assessment Question 4

Involving stakeholders like ____________ is important to


support future research and projects in the topic of
malnutrition and transitions of care.
A. The local news station
B. The Marketing Director
C. Hospital Visitors
D. Hospital Administration

Learning Assessment Answer 4

Involving stakeholders like ____________ is important to


support future research and projects in the topic of
malnutrition and transitions of care.
A. The local news station
B. The Marketing Director
C. Hospital Visitors
D. Hospital Administration

43
Learning Assessment Question 5

Data collected from implementing a malnutrition policy and


malnutrition quality improvement projects are best used to
______________.
A. create community awareness
B. give to primary Care Physicians
C. support interventions to prevent malnutrition
D. strengthen the hospital team dynamic

Learning Assessment Answer 5

Data collected from implementing a malnutrition policy and


malnutrition quality improvement projects are best used to
______________.
A. create community awareness
B. give to primary Care Physicians
C. support interventions to prevent malnutrition
D. strengthen the hospital team dynamic

44
References List
1. Valladares A, Jones K, Mitchell K, et al. Dialogue Proceedings / Advancing Patient-Centered Malnutrition Care Transitions. Avalere
Health LLC. Defeat Malnutrition Today. https://avalere.com/insights/dialogue-proceedings-advancing-patient-centered-malnutrition-
care-transitions. Published 2018. Accessed May-June 23, 2020.

2. Malnutrition Solution Center. Infographics: Malnourished Hospitalized Patients Are Associated with Poorer Outcomes, Malnourished
Hospitalized Patients Continue to Rise. 2021. ASPEN Web site.
https://www.nutritioncare.org/guidelines_and_clinical_resources/Malnutrition_Solution_Center/ Accessed August 5th 2023.

3. Malnutrition in Hospitalized Adults. Research Protocol October 30, 2020. Agency for Healthcare Research Quality Web site.
https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/malnutrition-hospitalized-
adults/protocol#:~:text=According%20to%20an%20Agency%20for,patients%20with%20no%20associated%20malnutrition Accessed
August 5th, 2023.

4. Mogensen KM, DiMaria-Ghalili RA. Malnutrition vigilance during care transitions. Today’s Geriatric Medicine. 2015;8(4):12.

5. Heersink JT, Brown CJ, DiMaria-Ghalili RA, Locher JL. Undernutrition in hospitalized old adults: patterns and correlates, outcomes,
and opportunities for intervention with a focus on processed of care. J Nutr Elder. 2010;29(1):4-41.

6. White J, Guenter P, Jensen G. Consensus Statement of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and
Enteral Nutrition: Characteristics Recommended for the Identification and Documentation of Adult Malnutrition (Undernutrition). J
Acad Nutr Diet. 2012;112(5):730-738. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.012

References List (cont)


7. Alberda C, Graf A, McCargar L. Malnutrition: Etiology, consequences, and assessment of a patient at risk. Best Pract
Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2006;20(3):419-439. doi:10.1016/j.bpg.2006.01.006

8. Medical Nutrition Therapy Act. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Web site.
https://www.eatrightpro.org/advocacy/legislation/all-legislation/medical-nutrition-therapy-act Accessed August 6, 2023.

9. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. Federal Register. Rules and Regulations. Final Rule. Fed Regist.
2019;84(189):51836-51884. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-09-30/pdf/2019-20732.pdf.

10. The Joint Commission. Transitions of care: the need for a more effective approach to continuing patient care. June
2012. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/deprecated-unorganized/imported-assets/tjc/system-folders/topics-
library/hot_topics_transitions_of_carepdf.pdf?db=web&hash=CEFB254D5EC36E4FFE30ABB20A5550E0 Accessed
July 2020.

11. Baker EB, Wellman NS. Nutrition concerns in discharge planning for older adults: A need for multidisciplinary
collaboration. J Am Diet Assoc. 2005;105(4):603-607. doi:10.1016/j.jada.2005.01.006

45
References List (cont)
Literature Review
12. Endevelt R, Lemberger J, Bregman J, et al. Intensive dietary intervention by a dietitian as a case manager among
community dwelling older adults: The edit study. J Nutr Heal Aging. 2011;15(8):624-630. doi:10.1007/s12603-011-0074-9
13. Beck A, Andersen UT, Leedo E, et al. Does adding a dietician to the liaison team after discharge of geriatric patients
improve nutritional outcome: A randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(11):1117-1128.
doi:10.1177/0269215514564700
14. Beck AM, Kjær S, Hansen BS, Storm RL, Thal-Jantzen K, Bitz C. Follow-up home visits with registered dietitians have a
positive effect on the functional and nutritional status of geriatric medical patients after discharge: a randomized
controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2012;27(6):483-493. doi:10.1177/0269215512469384
15. Beck AM, Holst M, Rasmussen HH. Oral nutritional support of older (65 years+) medical and surgical patients after
discharge from hospital: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rehabil.
2012;27(1):19-27. doi:10.1177/0269215512445396
16. Terp R, Jacobsen KO, Kannegaard P, Larsen AM, Madsen OR, Noiesen E. A nutritional intervention program improves
the nutritional status of geriatric patients at nutritional risk—a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32(7):930-
941. doi:10.1177/0269215518765912

References List (cont)


Literature Review
17. Feldblum I, German L, Castel H, Harman-Boehm I, Shahar DR. Individualized nutritional intervention during and
after hospitalization: The nutrition intervention study clinical trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2011;59(1):10-17.
doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.2010.03174.x
18. Mudge A, Young A, Ross L, et al. Hospital to home outreach for malnourished elders (Hhome): A feasibility pilot. J
Aging Res Clin Pract. 2012;1(2):131-134.
19. Hamirudin AH, Walton K, Charlton K, et al. Feasibility of home-based dietetic intervention to improve the nutritional
status of older adults post-hospital discharge. Nutr Diet. 2017;74(3):217-223. doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12305
20. Vearing R, Casey S, Zaremba C, et al. Evaluation of the impact of a post-hospital discharge transitional aged care
service on frailty, malnutrition and functional ability. Nutr Diet. 2019;76(4):472-479. doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12511
21. TenCate D, Ettema RGA, Huisman-de Waal G, et al. Interventions to prevent and treat malnutrition in older adults to
be carried out by nurses: A systematic review. J Clin Nurs. 2020;29(11-12):1883-1902. doi:10.1111/jocn.15153
22. Young AM, Mudge AM, Banks MD, Rogers L, Demedio K, Isenring E. Improving nutritional discharge planning and
follow up in older medical inpatients: Hospital to home outreach for malnourished elders. Nutr Diet. 2018;75(3):283-
290. doi:10.1111/1747-0080.12408

46
References List (cont)
Literature Review
23. Reinders I, Volkert D, de Groot LCPGM, et al. Effectiveness of nutritional interventions in older adults at risk of malnutrition
across different health care settings: Pooled analyses of individual participant data from nine randomized controlled trials. Clin
Nutr. 2019;38(4):1797-1806. doi:10.1016/j.clnu.2018.07.023
24. Buys DR, Campbell AD, Godfryd A, et al. Meals enhancing nutrition after discharge: Findings from a pilot randomized controlled
trial. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(4):599-608. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2016.11.005
25. Allmark G, Calder PC, Marino L V. Research identified variation in nutrition practice by community prescribing dietitians with
regards to the identification and management of malnutrition amongst community dwelling adults. Nutr Res. 2020;76:94-105.
doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2019.10.005
26. Chareh N, Rappl A, Rimmele M, et al. Does a 12-month transitional care model intervention by geriatric experienced care
professionals improve nutritional status of older patients after hospital discharge? A randomized controlled trial. Nutrients.
2021;13(9). doi:10.3390/nu13093023
27. Sriram K, Sulo S, Vanderbosch G, et al. A comprehensive nutrition-focused quality improvement program reduces 30-day
readmissions and length of stay in hospitalized patients. J Parenter Enter Nutr. 2017;41(3):384-391.
doi:10.1177/0148607116681468
28. Mullin GE, Fan L, Sulo S, Partridge J. The association between oral nutritional supplements and 30-day hospital readmissions
of malnourished patients at a US Academic Medical Center. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2019;119(7):1168-1175.
doi:10.1016/j.jand.2019.01.014
29. Sulo S, Riley K, Liu Y, Landow W, Lanctin D, VanDerBosch G. Nutritional support for outpatients at risk of malnutrition improves
health outcomes and reduces healthcare costs. Qual Prim Care. 2020;28(3):12-18.

References List (cont)


Literature Review

30. Siegel S, Fan L, Goldman A, Higgins J, Goates S, Partridge J. Impact of a nutrition-focused quality improvement intervention
on hospital length of stay. J Nurs Care Qual. 2019;34(3):203-209. doi:10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000382

31. Verhaegh KJ, MacNeil-Vroomen JL, Eslami S, Geerlings SE, de Rooij SE, Buurman BM. Transitional care interventions
prevent hospital readmissions for adults with chronic illnesses. Health Aff. 2014;33(9):1531-1539.
doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2014.0160

32. Kim H, Thyer BA. Does transitional care prevent older adults from rehospitalization? A review. J Evidence-Informed Soc Work.
2015;12(3):261-271. doi:10.1080/15433714.2013.827140

33. Low LL, Vasanwala FF, Ng LB, Chen C, Lee KH, Tan SY. Effectiveness of a transitional home care program in reducing acute
hospital utilization: A quasi-experimental study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15(100):1-8. doi:10.1186/s12913-015-0750-2

34. Kansagara D, Chiovaro JC, Kagen D, et al. So many options, where do we start? An overview of the care transitions literature.
J Hosp Med. 2016;11(3):221-230. doi:10.1002/jhm.2502

35. Finlayson K, Chang AM, Courtney MD, et al. Transitional care interventions reduce unplanned hospital readmissions in high-
risk older adults. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1). doi:10.1186/s12913-018-3771-9

36. Conroy T, Heuzenroeder L, Feo R. In-hospital interventions for reducing readmissions to acute care for adults aged 65 and
over: An umbrella review. Int J Qual Heal care J Int Soc Qual Heal Care. 2020;32(7):414-430. doi:10.1093/intqhc/mzaa064

47
References List (cont)
Literature Review
37. Facchinetti G, D’Angelo D, Piredda M, et al. Continuity of care interventions for preventing hospital readmission of
older people with chronic diseases: A meta-analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2020;101:103396.
doi:10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2019.103396
38. Englander H, Michaels L, Chan B, Kansagara D. The Care Transitions Innovation (C-TraIn) for socioeconomically
disadvantaged adults: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2014;29(11):1460-1467.
doi:10.1007/s11606-014-2903-0
39. Aboumatar H, Naqibuddin M, Chung S, et al. Effect of a hospital-initiated program combining transitional care and
long-term self-management support on outcomes of patients hospitalized with chronic obstructive pulmonary
disease: A randomized clinical trial. JAMA - J Am Med Assoc. 2019;322(14):1371-1380.
doi:10.1001/jama.2019.11982
40. Ohuabunwa U, Johnson E, Turner J, Jordan Q, Popoola V, Flacker J. An integrated model of care utilizing community
health workers to promote safe transitions of care. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2021;69(9):2638-2647. doi:10.1111/jgs.17325

References List (cont)


41. Types of Evaluations. CDC. Accessed January, 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/std/Program/pupestd/Types of
Evaluation.pdf.
42. Developing an Effective Evaluation Plan. CDC Web Page. Published October, 2011. Accessed January, 2021.
https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/cdc-evaluation-workbook-508.pdf.
43. Lawrence General Hospital. Web site: https://www.lawrencegeneral.org/
44. PG-SGA. Pt-Global Web site. 2014. http://pt-global.org/?page_id=13.
45. Schweizer M, Braun B, Milstone A. Research Methods in Healthcare Epidemiology and Antimicrobial Stewardship
Quasi-Experimental Designs. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016;37(10):1135-1140. doi:10.1017/ice.2016.117
46. Zoellner J, Harris JE. Mixed-Methods Research in Nutrition and Dietetics. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017;117(5):683-697.
doi:10.1016/j.jand.2017.01.018
47. Miller CJ, Smith SN, Pugatch M. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs in implementation research.
Psychiatry Res. 2020;283(112452). doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2019.06.027

48
Pre-Admission Patient-Reported Screening
Tool Streamlines Assessment: The PG-SGA©
in an Electronic Health Record
Joy Heimgartner, MS, RDN, CSO, CNSC, LDN
Assistant Professor of Nutrition, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine &
Science
Clinical Dietitian, Advanced Practice II, Blood & Marrow Transplant
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota

Disclosure
• No commercial relationships to disclose.

49
Learning Objectives
Upon completion of this educational activity, the learner will be able to:
• Describe how the electronic PG-SGA© can be used for nutrition screening
and assessment when built into the Epic® electronic health record.

92

Timeline of PG-SGA© Integration into Epic®at Mayo Clinic


2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
2014: PG- Mayo Dietetic Medical Proposal for April: Epic Pilot PG-SGA
SGA digital dietitians intern- Oncology PG-SGA build ticket as outpatient
COVID approved.
app & design a involved requests a approved & screening tool
webtool research research validated promoted by All new Epic October: PG- in limited
available for study to use study using nutrition Clinical build halted SGA flowsheet populations.
purchase PG-SGA in PG-SGA in screening tool Nutrition build,
(one time fee) hematology/B newly for outpatient. Specialty validations,
MT patients diagnosed Council. testing Share build
Formal completed. with Epic
AML patients: evaluation of
Dr. Faith Compared Epic build December: users
Ottery, MD, Dept of validated ticket October: Re- worldwide.
existing tool, tools by submitted Questionnaire
PhD, FACN is Medicine MST and PG- submitted: & other Epic
guest speaker Innovation oncology denied due to ticket request components
SGA specialist to build PG-
at November Award for questionnaire built.
Joint Staff tablets & RDs. request. SGA into Epic
Epic arrival: with more Dec 16,
meeting software BMT dietitian Dr. Ottery
takes job as gives CoC makes stakeholder 7:01pm:
Epic Core permission to nutrition support & PG-SGA
Credentialed work with screening now a CoC goes live in
Trainer (April) guidelines a regulatory Mayo Epic!
Mayo Clinic to
build PG-SGA requirement, requirement.
into Epic. effective in
2020.

50
93
PG-SGA: Beyond Nutrition Screening

• Tremendously powerful scored tool for nutrition assessment


≫Identify right patient, right time, right setting
≫More useful with challenging patient populations (those with
fluid overload)

• Research possibilities
≫ disease types, interventions, and outcomes

• International leadership
≫Global demand for PG-SGA© to be implemented into the EMR
(Global TeleNutrition Consortium)
≫Translated and validated in 22 languages, more coming online
every year
Microsoft stock image library

94

Clarification: PG-SGA(SF) & PG-SGA


• The PG-SGA© (SF) is the patient-generated portion of the tool
≫The PG-SG(SF) is considered the screening portion.
• Both the PG-SGA© (SF) by itself and the full PG-SGA© are validated tools in a variety
of patient populations.

MST PG-SGA(SF) PG-SGA


(full)
Validated nutrition screening tool? yes yes yes
Provides interventional triage? no yes yes
Provides ease of monitoring ? no yes yes
Nutrition Assessment tool? no no yes

51
95

Why the PG-SGA?


• Used internationally for 25 years
≫ 22 validated language translations

• 400+ publications
• “The PG-SGA© is the preeminent interdisciplinary patient assessment
(weight, intake, symptoms, functional status, disease state, metabolic
stress and nutritional physical examination) in oncology and other chronic
catabolic conditions.” http://pt-global.org

96

Not just Outpatient


Not just Oncology
PG-SGA© is validated in a wide variety of settings and clinical conditions:
• Hospitalized and ambulatory patients
• Especially helpful in complex medical conditions
≫Cancer
≫Renal disease & dialysis
• Other institutions use PG-SGA© to screen patients before planned surgeries:
≫Complex spine
≫Cardiac & vascular
≫GI/Gyne surgical
• Opportunities for use in
≫Solid organ transplant

52
97

PG-SGA© (SF) leveraged as an Epic ® Questionnaire


• Can be assigned manually or automatically.
≫Tied to designated providers, visit types, etc.

• Can be set of as a one-time assignment or series of assignments over


time.
• Patients can complete questionnaire within their patient portal on their own
device OR on a tablet when they arrive for appointment.
• Responses flow directly into the PG-SGA© flowsheet where the
calculations are completed automatically.

98

PG-SGA© openly available to any Epic® enabled EHR


• PG-SGA© is now available freely to any institution using Epic®
≫No further copyright approvals needed if using the Mayo Clinic/Epic built
Patient Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA©)
• The flowsheet build CANNOT BE CHANGED without copyright approval from Dr. Ottery.

≫Language translations in Epic still need to be approved by Dr. Ottery.


• Norwegian language is approved and in use in Norway currently.

≫Not yet in standard Epic build (2024?)


≫Can be requested as a Turbo Package by your Epic technical specialist
≫FREE of charge

53
99

Patient-facing questionnaire on tablet

Photo credit: Joy Heimgartner

100

Photo credit: Joy Heimgartner

54
101

Photo credit: Joy Heimgartner

102

Photo credit: Joy Heimgartner

55
103

Image: Epic® Flowsheet

104

Image: Epic® Flowsheet

56
105

New in the Mayo Clinic build


(per request of Dr. Ottery)

Image: Epic® Flowsheet

106

Image: Epic® Flowsheet

57
107

Image: Epic® Flowsheet

108

Image: Epic® Flowsheet

58
109

Snapshot view print group


using information from the PG-
SGA© flowsheet

Image: Epic® schedule & PG-SGA(SF) print group

110

Synopsis viewer of scores


over time using information
from the PG-SGA© flowsheet

Image: Epic® synopsis viewer

59
111

Sample Note using


information from the
PG-SGA© flowsheet

Image: Epic® note

112

A NOTE ABOUT TRIAGE SCORES

Triage recommendations that are built into the


PG-SGA© are based on a full PG-SGA©
score.

PG-SGA©(SF) Short form scores will always


be lower, although most scoring comes from
weight change, intake, and symptoms (SF
components).

No defined triage numbers have been set for


the PG-SGA©(SF) and institutions can decide
how they choose to use those scores in
patient care.

60
Summary
• Electronic screening should meet the needs of both patients and providers.
• Patient-reported information is valuable to discern what problems are most impacting the
patient. PG-SGA© is a tool that has always meant to be patient-reported and was built to
leverage that knowledge.
• The PG-SGA© (SF) incorporates patient-reported weight change information, symptom
information, intake information, and activity information all in one place.
• PG-SGA© is a scored tool with high content validity and answers/scores can be monitored
over time, regardless of setting (hospitalized/ambulatory/home).
• If your institution uses Epic, the Mayo Clinic/Epic built Patient Generated Subjective
Global Assessment (PG-SGA©) is available free of charge or further copyright
approval.

References List
1. Ruan X, Nakyeyune R, Shao Y, Shen Y, Niu C, Zang Z, Miles T, Liu F. Nutritional screening tools for adult cancer patients: A
hierarchical Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis. Clin Nutr. 2021 Apr;40(4):1733-1743.
2. Gomes-Neto AW, van Vliet IMY, Osté MCJ, de Jong MFC, Bakker SJL, Jager-Wittenaar H, Navis GJ. Malnutrition Universal
Screening Tool and Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short Form and their predictive validity in hospitalized
patients. Clin Nutr ESPEN. 2021 Oct;45:252-261.
3. De Groot LM, Lee G, Ackerie A, van der Meij BS. Malnutrition Screening and Assessment in the Cancer Care Ambulatory
Setting: Mortality Predictability and Validity of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short form (PG-SGA SF)
and the GLIM Criteria. Nutrients. 2020 Jul 30;12(8):2287.
4. Jager-Wittenaar H, Ottery FD. Assessing nutritional status in cancer: role of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global
Assessment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017 Sep;20(5):322-329.
5. Abbott J, Teleni L, McKavanagh D, Watson J, McCarthy AL, Isenring E. Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment Short
Form (PG-SGA SF) is a valid screening tool in chemotherapy outpatients. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Sep;24(9):3883-7.
6. Sealy MJ, Nijholt W, Stuiver MM, van der Berg MM, Roodenburg JL, van der Schans CP, Ottery FD, Jager-Wittenaar H.
Content validity across methods of malnutrition assessment in patients with cancer is limited. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016
Aug;76:125-36.
7. Guerra RS, Sousa AS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Restivo MT, Ferreira S, Amaral TF. Comparative analysis of undernutrition
screening and diagnostic tools as predictors of hospitalisation costs. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Apr;29(2):165-73.
8. Martin L, Watanabe S, Fainsinger R, Lau F, Ghosh S, Quan H, Atkins M, Fassbender K, Downing GM, Baracos V. Prognostic
factors in patients with advanced cancer: use of the patient-generated subjective global assessment in survival prediction. J
Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct 1;28(28):4376-83.

61
Acknowledgement
This educational offering was provided to you by ASPEN, supported by an
educational grant from Nestlé Health Science.

Companion Practice Tool at:


nutritioncare.org/MAW

Supported in part by
Nestlé Health Science

62
Questions
Submit your questions using the interactive panel on the left.

Click Questions to submit your questions directly to the faculty.

For technical support, please use the Request Support button at


the bottom left of the webinar player.

Other MAW Events


Register at nutritioncare.org/MAWschedule

September 18 Assessing Nutrition Status in Infants and Young Children: Laboratory and Physical
Assessment Strategies
3:00–4:00 PM Sponsored by ByHeart

September 20 Pathophysiology, Prognosis, and Management of Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS)


4:00–5:00 PM Sponsored by Takeda

September 20 ¡ALTO! a la desnutrición hospitalaria en el siglo XXI Tema Tiempo Ponente


7:00–8:00 PM Presented by the Ibero Latin American Section of ASPEN. Webinar held in Spanish.

September 27 Gastro Bites 2023: Malnutrition Awareness in the Gastrointestinal Patient


12:00–2:30 PM Hosted in collaboration with American Gastroenterological Association

September 28 ASPEN/CNS: How to Spread & Sustain Awareness of Malnutrition


12:00–1:15 PM Joint webinar from ASPEN and society partner Canadian Nutrition Society

October 2–6 Canadian Malnutrition Awareness Week

October 9–13 Malnutrition Week ANZ 2023

Note: All times listed are in Eastern Time.

63
Visit: Follow or like us on:
nutritioncare.org for more information
on clinical nutrition and metabolism nutritioncare.org/facebook

nutritioncare.org/membership to nutritioncare.org/twitter
become a member
nutritioncare.org/linkedin
nutritioncare.org/elearning for
nutritioncare.org/youtube
on-demand continuing education
nutritioncare.org/podcasts

64
MARCH 2–5, 2024
TAMPA CONVENTION CENTER
AND VIRTUAL

TOP REASONS TO ATTEND

© Copyright 2023 ASPEN | American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition. Photo credits: ASPEN and Tampa Convention Center
▸ Professional Growth
▸ Cutting-Edge Research
▸ Evidence-Based Clinical Updates
▸ Network with Experts and Peers
▸ Product and Industry Innovations
▸ CE Credits!
TWO WAYS TO ATTEND
In Tampa, Florida or virtually

EARLY REGISTRATION DISCOUNTS & PERKS


Register early for the lowest rates and for a chance
to win a free hotel night, invitation to the President’s
Reception, and more! Registration opens in October!

NUTRITIONCARE.ORG/ASPEN24

The Tampa Convention Center is located in the heart of Downtown


Tampa and at the mouth of the Hillsborough River. While in Tampa,
take advantage of its many attractions including the Florida Aquarium,
Busch Gardens Tampa, and Straz Center for Performing Arts.
And Tampa is only a 1-hour drive to Walt Disney World Resort,
Universal Studios, and MLB Spring Training.
Learn more at VisitTampaBay.com

65
PRECONFERENCE COURSES
AT ASPEN24
MARCH 1–2, 2024
TAMPA, FLORIDA AND VIRTUAL

Three exceptional educational opportunities to expand your skills and advance your career are offered prior
to the ASPEN 2024 Nutrition Science & Practice Conference. These deep-dive courses provide valuable
insights into topics designed for a range of skill levels—from those just beginning their careers to seasoned
clinicians in all disciplines.

MARCH 1 • 8:00 AM–4:00 PM MARCH 2 • 7:00 AM–11:00 AM

Physician Preconference Course Nutrition for the Practicing Pediatric Clinician


Comprehensive Nutrition Therapy— Chaos on The Playground: Micronutrient
Tactical Approaches in 2024 (PHY-2024) and Fluid Management in Pediatric
Location: Tampa General Hospital Nutrition Support (NPPC-2024)
Location: Tampa Convention Center
Designed to stimulate physician interest in nutrition
and underscore its impact on patient outcomes. Explore the management and treatment of a
Includes case-based sessions on: variety of issues including acid-base, fluids and
• Nutrition strategies in the setting of specific electrolytes, refeeding syndrome, anemia, and more
gastrointestinal disorders in pediatric patient populations.
• Nutrition support in the critically ill patient Ideal for pediatric clinicians of all disciplines.
• Challenges in the ambulatory care setting Post Graduate Course
Student/trainee attendance is free with proof of Nutritional Aspects of Endocrine Care:
training status. Evidence, Cases, and Teams (PG1-2024)
Location: Tampa Convention Center
Take a deep dive into a variety of endocrine
disorders and evidence-based treatment
approaches for nutrition management. Presented
in a case-based environment, come away with
practical nutrition care and treatment tools.
Ideal for clinicians in all practice areas.

Registration opens in October!


nutritioncare.org/PreCon
• Schedule to subject to change.

Pediatric Content Included Virtual Session


66
© Copyright 2023 ASPEN | American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition
STAY CURRENT WITH CLINICAL NUTRITION
ASPEN Resources Help You Provide Patients With the Best Possible Care

ASPEN Adult & ASPEN Enteral Nutrition-Focused The Practitioner’s Guide


Pediatric Core Package Nutrition Handbook, Physical Exam to Nutrition-Focused
Comprehensive references Second Edition for Adults: An Physical Exam of
covering a full range of Updated and expanded Illustrated Handbook, Infants, Children, and
disease states. Great for guide on providing safe and Second Edition Adolescents
preparing for certification. effective care for tube-fed Colorful how-to illustrations Illustrated, step-by-step
Save when you patients of all ages. to identify malnutrition and guide to identify malnutrition
buy the package! monitor patient progress. in infants, children,
Provides suggestions for and adolescents.
electronic medical record
documentation.

ASPEN
Parenteral
Nutrition
Handbook

THIRD EDITION

Phil Ayers, PharmD, BCNSP, FASHP


Elizabeth S. Bobo, CNSC, MS, RDN, LDN
Ryan T. Hurt, MD, PhD
Andrew A. Mays, PharmD, BCNSP, CNSC
Patricia H. Worthington, MSN, RN,
CNSC

Guidebook on ASPEN Fluids, ASPEN Parenteral ASPEN Parenteral


Enteral Medication Electrolytes, and Nutrition Handbook, Nutrition Workbook,
Administration Acid-Base Disorders Third Edition Second Edition
A must-have reference of Handbook, Popular, quick reference Demonstrate proficiency in
enteral drug monographs Second Edition for key aspects of writing PN orders using this
for all pharmacies and Concise, user-friendly PN management, including workbook-style resource.
education programs. guide providing patient home PN support. Provides realistic practice
scenarios for adult,
scenarios on fluid control
pediatric, and neonatal
and related disorders.
patients, along with home
Awarded third place in the PN examples.
2020 AJN Book of the
Year Awards!

Visit nutritioncare.org/bookstore
to get these must-have resources! 67
Presentation Title: Malnutrition Across the Care Continuum
Name: Rose Ann DiMaria-Ghalili, PhD, RN, FASPEN, FAAN, FGSA
Title, Affiliation: Professor of Nursing and Senior Associate Dean for Research, College of Nursing
and Health Professions, Drexel University

Disclosures: I have no financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Presentation Overview/Summary:
Older adults are at risk for malnutrition across the care continuum. Nutrition screening is performed on
admission to the hospital; however, nutrition problems may go unnoticed as older adults transition from
hospital to home. This presentation will highlight several barriers for facilitating nutrition during care
transitions and highlight opportunities for change.

Learning Objectives:
At the conclusion of the presentation, the learner will be able to:
1. Describe the relationship between U.S. demographic trends and malnutrition across the care
continuum.
2. Discuss barriers and facilitators to promoting optimal nutrition during care transitions.
3. Identify solutions to addressing malnutrition across the care continuum.

Learning Assessment Questions:


1. Malnutrition assessment at hospital discharge is a standard aspect of care in the United States?
True or False.
A. True
B. False

2. Older adults are at risk for malnutrition across the care continuum? True or False.
A. True
B. False

Learning Assessment Answers:


1. Answer = B; Nutrition assessment is a standard aspect of care upon admission to the hospital
and not at discharge.
2. Answer = A; As individuals age they experience several bio-psycho-social risk factors that can
increase the risk for malnutrition across the care continuum.

68
References:
1. Brooks, M., Vest, M. T., Shapero, M., & Papas, M. (2019). Malnourished adults’ receipt of
hospital discharge nutrition care instructions: a pilot study. Journal of Human Nutrition and
Dietetics, 32(5), 659-666.
2. Corkins, M. R., et al. (2014). Malnutrition diagnoses in hospitalized patients United States, 2010.
Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 38 (2), 186-195.
3. DiMaria‐Ghalili, R. A. (2014). Integrating nutrition in the comprehensive geriatric
assessment. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 29(4), 420-427.
4. Guenter P, Abdelhadi R, Anthony P, et al. (2021). Malnutrition diagnoses and associated
outcomes in hospitalized patients: United States, 2018. Nutrition in Clinical Practice, 36(5):957-
969.
5. Hestevik, C. H., Molin, M., Debesay, J., Bergland, A., & Bye, A. (2020). Older patients’ and their
family caregivers’ perceptions of food, meals and nutritional care in the transition between
hospital and home care: a qualitative study. BMC Nutrition, 6, 1-13.
6. Keller, H., Donnelly, R., Laur, C., Goharian, L., & Nasser, R. (2022). Consensus‐based nutrition
care pathways for hospital‐to‐community transitions and older adults in primary and community
care. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition, 46(1), 141-152.

69
Presentation Title: Implementation of a Transitions of Care Nutrition Intervention for Malnourished
Patients
Name: Nina G. Rocca DCN, MS, RDN, LDN, FAND
Title, Affiliation Clinical Dietitian at BayCare Hospitals, Florida.
Previous Clinical Dietitian at Lawrence General Hospital, Massachusetts (where research was
conducted), Owner of Prestige RD, LLC

Disclosures: I have no financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Presentation Overview/Summary:
Objective: To determine if a transitions of care nutrition intervention can lessen hospital readmissions
and improve nutrition status among hospitalized malnourished patients.
Purpose: Transitions of Care (TOC) research is popular among nursing and physicians, and more
recently nutrition professionals. Registered Dietitians (RDs) can play an important role in TOC by
communicating patients’ nutrition information across health care settings. The primary aim of the study
was to use a CDC process evaluation to evaluate if a case management, care transitions frameworks,
adapted for a TOC nutrition intervention, can result in a successful intervention. The secondary aim
was to use a CDC outcomes evaluation, to evaluate unplanned hospital readmissions and nutrition
status outcome measures of participants enrolled in the 5-week intervention. Methods: The primary
investigator (PI) compiled retrospect Lawrence General Hospital (LGH) patient data from November
2019 through June 2019 to create a comparison group and establish readmissions data. A mixed-
methods study design included qualitative, quantitative, and quasi-experimental pre/post intervention
methods. Patients with malnutrition admitted to LGH during a 6-month period starting August 2021,
through January 2022, who agreed to participate, were enrolled in a 5-week TOC nutrition intervention.
Results: Due to the small sample size (n=21), data was analyzed with caution. There was no
difference in hospital readmissions between the groups. Nutrition status did improve among participants
in the intervention group (n=13). Conclusion: The outcomes support the need to integrate a RD as
part of TOC multidisciplinary team, especially for patients with malnutrition to improve health outcomes
and nutrition status. Future research should focus on developing and evaluating TOC nutrition
interventions to improve hospital readmission rates and nutrition status.

Learning Objectives:
At the conclusion of the presentation, the learner will be able to:
1. Understand the burden of malnutrition in relation to hospital readmission and nutrition status.
2. Understand existing gaps in transitions of care systems for malnourished patients.
3. Identify valuable strategies and interventions RDNs and other health professionals can
implement across health care settings to support patients with malnutrition.

Key Takeaways/Fast Facts:


Transitions of care intervention should be led by dietitians to help improve nutrition status and improve
health outcomes like lessen unplanned hospital readmission. Heath professionals need to be educated
on malnutrition and the process to identify and treat this condition at their facility. Ongoing training to
promote awareness is warranted. As a collective establishing a solution to bridging the gaps in care
between hospital and home need continued research and support.

70
Learning Assessment Questions:

1. Hospital Remission is how much higher when patients have malnutrition than those without?
A. 4%
B. 20%
C. 50%
D. 75%
2. When reviewing previous research, transitions of care interventions that involved dietitians
found what to improve?
A. Improved blood work
B. Nutrition status
C. Infection Rate
D. Hospital Length of stay

3. When it comes to determining national unplanned readmission rates related to malnutrition,


what is missing?
A. A staff member who is responsible for tracking data
B. A standard tool to measure and track readmissions
C. Patients not understanding they should avoid readmission
D. Primary care doctors telling their patients to go to the hospital

4. Involving stakeholders like ____________ is important to support future research and projects
in the topic of malnutrition and transitions of care.
A. the local news station
B. the Marketing Director
C. Hospital Visitors
D. Hospital Administration

5. Data collected from implementing a malnutrition policy and malnutrition quality improvement
projects are best used to ______________.
A. create community awareness
B. give to primary Care Physicians
C. support interventions to prevent malnutrition
D. strengthen the hospital team dynamic

71
Learning Assessment Answers:
1. Answer = C; Rationale: Brining awareness to malnutrition and the impact it has on hospital
readmission, when combined with other illnesses and conditions is needed. Stakeholders
become interested and more likely to support interventions that can help reduce the risk of
unplanned hospital readmissions. Knowing the data that hospital readmission is 50% higher in
patients with malnutrition than those without is a strong talking point.
2. Answer = B; Rationale: Previous research found that including dietitians as part of transition of
care interventions improve nutrition status. An important point that dietitians should be valued
and included as part of the discharge planning and transitions of care processes. Sure, other
health care workers may be capable of completing similar tasks like encouraging healthy food
choices and intake. Why not provide more paid roles for dietitians to have the nutrition expert be
a part of providing this information and support to patients during transitions of care.
3. Answer = B; Rationale: A lack of readmission data connected to those patients with
malnutrition is limited. When reviewing the literature, inconsistent methods were used to
measure and track unplanned hospital readmissions in those patients with malnutrition. Poor
methods could lead to misleading results. The reason is unclear. A standard method for
measuring and tracking readmission data needs to be established.
4. Answer = D; Rationale: Involving stakeholders is one of the first essential steps when
developing an intervention program at any facility. According to the CDC guidelines for process
and outcomes evaluations. Stakeholders like hospital administration leaders’ interest and
support is needed for programs related to nutrition and malnutrition treatment and prevention to
be successful. Otherwise, projects may go unrecognized or not have the support needed to
implement and complete the program as planned. Completing a program as intended is
especially important when the data you need from the completion of the program will be used to
show the impact and need for the said program to continue. Stakeholders need to be invested
and see the value and worth of these programs for them to continue financially supporting them.
5. Answer = C; Rationale: Start by assessing the needs of your community to establish the best
malnutrition protocol and malnutrition quality improvement program that should be implemented
at your facility. There are many tools out there to start these initiatives wherever you may work.
Acute care hospital, long term care, or hospital to home. Data collection is needed to show how
malnutrition quality improvement projects and interventions are needed help to improve
malnutrition and associated health outcomes.

72
References:
1. Valladares A, Jones K, Mitchell K, et al. Dialogue Proceedings / Advancing Patient-Centered
Malnutrition Care Transitions. Avalere Health LLC. Defeat Malnutrition Today.
https://avalere.com/insights/dialogue-proceedings-advancing-patient-centered-malnutrition-care-
transitions. Published 2018. Accessed May-June 23, 2020.
2. Malnutrition Solution Center. Infographics: Malnourished Hospitalized Patients Are Associated
with Poorer Outcomes, Malnourished Hospitalized Patients Continue to Rise. 2021. ASPEN
Web site.
https://www.nutritioncare.org/guidelines_and_clinical_resources/Malnutrition_Solution_Center/
Accessed August 5th 2023.
3. Malnutrition in Hospitalized Adults. Research Protocol October 30, 2020. Agency for Healthcare
Research Quality Web site. https://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/products/malnutrition-
hospitalized-
adults/protocol#:~:text=According%20to%20an%20Agency%20for,patients%20with%20no%20a
ssociated%20malnutrition Accessed August 5th, 2023.
4. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid. Federal Register. Rules and Regulations. Final Rule. Fed
Regist. 2019;84(189):51836-51884. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2019-09-
30/pdf/2019-20732.pdf.
5. The Joint Commission. Transitions of care: the need for a more effective approach to continuing
patient care. June 2012. https://www.jointcommission.org/-/media/deprecated-
unorganized/imported-assets/tjc/system-folders/topics-
library/hot_topics_transitions_of_carepdf.pdf?db=web&hash=CEFB254D5EC36E4FFE30ABB2
0A5550E0 Accessed July 2020.
6. White J, Guenter P, Jensen G. Consensus Statement of the Academy of Nutrition and
Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition: Characteristics Recommended
for the Identification and Documentation of Adult Malnutrition (Undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet.
2012;112(5):730-738. doi:10.1016/j.jand.2012.03.012
7. Beck A, Andersen UT, Leedo E, et al. Does adding a dietician to the liaison team after
discharge of geriatric patients improve nutritional outcome: A randomized controlled trial. Clin
Rehabil. 2015;29(11):1117-1128. doi:10.1177/0269215514564700
8. Endevelt R, Lemberger J, Bregman J, et al. Intensive dietary intervention by a dietitian as a
case manager among community dwelling older adults: The edit study. J Nutr Heal Aging.
2011;15(8):624-630. doi:10.1007/s12603-011-0074-9

73
Presentation: Title: Pre-Admission Patient-Reported Screening Tool Streamlines Assessment: The
PG-SGA© in an Electronic Health Record.
Name: Joy Heimgartner, MS, RDN, CSO, CNSC, LD
Title, Affiliation: Registered Dietitian Nutritionist (APII), Blood and Marrow Transplant, Assistant
Professor of Nutrition, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine and Science, Rochester, MN

Disclosures: I have no financial relationships with ineligible companies to disclose.

Presentation Overview/Summary:
The integration of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment© tool into the electronic health
record allows for consistent gathering of patient-reported information across the care continuum. This
presentation will demonstrate how this questionnaire is assigned to and completed by patients, either
remotely or in person. Electronic health record reporting and charting tools generated from patient
responses will also be shown.

Learning Objectives
At the conclusion of the presentation, the learner will be able to:
1. Describe how the electronic PG-SGA© can be used for nutrition screening and assessment
when built into the Epic® electronic health record.

Key Takeaways/Fast Facts:


To demonstrate an example of how one scored screening and assessment tool can be used across the
care continuum.

References:
1. Ruan X, Nakyeyune R, Shao Y, Shen Y, Niu C, Zang Z, Miles T, Liu F. Nutritional screening
tools for adult cancer patients: A hierarchical Bayesian latent-class meta-analysis. Clin Nutr.
2021 Apr;40(4):1733-1743.
2. Gomes-Neto AW, van Vliet IMY, Osté MCJ, de Jong MFC, Bakker SJL, Jager-Wittenaar H,
Navis GJ. Malnutrition Universal Screening Tool and Patient-Generated Subjective Global
Assessment Short Form and their predictive validity in hospitalized patients. Clin Nutr ESPEN.
2021 Oct;45:252-261.
3. De Groot LM, Lee G, Ackerie A, van der Meij BS. Malnutrition Screening and Assessment in the
Cancer Care Ambulatory Setting: Mortality Predictability and Validity of the Patient-Generated
Subjective Global Assessment Short form (PG-SGA SF) and the GLIM Criteria. Nutrients. 2020
Jul 30;12(8):2287.
4. Jager-Wittenaar H, Ottery FD. Assessing nutritional status in cancer: role of the Patient-
Generated Subjective Global Assessment. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care. 2017
Sep;20(5):322-329.
5. Abbott J, Teleni L, McKavanagh D, Watson J, McCarthy AL, Isenring E. Patient-Generated
Subjective Global Assessment Short Form (PG-SGA SF) is a valid screening tool in
chemotherapy outpatients. Support Care Cancer. 2016 Sep;24(9):3883-7.
6. Sealy MJ, Nijholt W, Stuiver MM, van der Berg MM, Roodenburg JL, van der Schans CP, Ottery
FD, Jager-Wittenaar H. Content validity across methods of malnutrition assessment in patients
with cancer is limited. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Aug;76:125-36.
7. Guerra RS, Sousa AS, Fonseca I, Pichel F, Restivo MT, Ferreira S, Amaral TF. Comparative
analysis of undernutrition screening and diagnostic tools as predictors of hospitalisation costs. J
Hum Nutr Diet. 2016 Apr;29(2):165-73.
8. Martin L, Watanabe S, Fainsinger R, Lau F, Ghosh S, Quan H, Atkins M, Fassbender K,
Downing GM, Baracos V. Prognostic factors in patients with advanced cancer: use of the
patient-generated subjective global assessment in survival prediction. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Oct
1;28(28):4376-83.

74

You might also like