You are on page 1of 14

Minerals Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 12, pp. 1243-1256, 1991 0892-6875/91 $3.00+0.

00
Printed in Great Britain Pergamon Press plc

PREDICTION OF POWER CONSUMPTION AND PRODUCT SIZE IN CONE CRUSHING

R.A. BEARMAN§, R.W. BARLEYt and A. HITCHCOCK§

§ Pegson Ltd., Coalville, Leicester LE6 3ES, England


f Camborne School of Mines, Redruth, Cornwall, England
(Received 1 February 1991; revision accepted 8 March 1991)

ABSTRACT

An investigation of the parameters affecting the performance of laboratory


scale cone crushers is presented. This work forms part of a rock
characterisation initiative undertaken by Pegson Ltd. and the Camborne School
of Mines.

The effect of feed size, closed side setting and rock strength on the power
consumption and product size is examined. Rock strength is characterised via
a series o/tests used in mining and associated areas.

Certain rock strength parameters have been found to correlate closely with
power consumption and product size. These parameters are then combined with
closed side setting to produce predictive equations. These equations are capable
of predicting power consumption and eighty percent passing size of product for
a range o/closed side settings.

The predictive equations are presented as a series of three dimensional graphs.


The graphs allow the design engineer to envisage the variation in power and
product size with variation in operating parameters.

In addition to predicting the eighty percent passing product size, a method of


predicting the full product grading is presented. This method is based on the
Rosin-Rammler-Bennett distribution.

The prediction of power consumption and product size/grading is based on a


geotechnical approach developed by Pegson Ltd. and applied to the design and
selection of crushing circuits.

Keywords
Comminution, rock characterisation.

INTRODUCTION

The production of a method of predicting crusher performance in terms of power


consumption and product size has been the goal of many workers in the field of
comminution.

Both Kick [1] and Rittinger [2] proposed basic laws of comminution based on simple ideas
of size reduction. Later Bond [3] re-examined their work and proposed his third law of
comminution. Bond proposed that power consumption is a function of feed size, product
size and crushing resistance of rock, i.e:

1243
1244 R . A . BEARMAN et al.

W = f (Fs0, Ps0, Wi)

where:W - power consumption (kWh/t),


Fs0 - eighty percent passing size of feed (/~m),
Ps0 - eighty percent passing size of product (/~m),
Wi - Work Index (kWh/t).

The basic, parameters proposed by Bond have proved reasonably valid, however their
applicability to all forms of crushing must be questioned.

In order to investigate power consumption and product size in cone crushing, a major co-
operative research project was undertaken by Pegson Ltd., in conjunction with the
Camborne School of Mines. The aim of this research project was to identify rock mechanics
test procedures that could be used alongside Bond's parameters to better charaeterise the
performance of the Pegson Autocone crushers. Also, the potential of using geotechnical
evaluation of rock types in the design and selection of crushing circuits was to be brought
to the attention of the quarrying industry.

TEST PROCEDURE AND CORRELATION OF DATA

Twelve rock types were obtained from operating quarries throughout the United Kingdom.
This allowed a good cross-section of rock types to be examined. Table 1 gives a summary
of the rock types obtained, although a detailed lithological description of most of the rock
types is given by Bearman, Pine and Wills [4].

TABLE 1 Summary of rock types tested

Mode of formation Rock type

Igneous Cliffe Hill diorite, Bolton Hill diorite, Penryn


granite, Whitwick andesite

Sedimentary Harrycroft limestone, Wredon limestone, Middleton


limestone, Pennant sandstone, Montcliffe sandstone,
Ingleton greywacke, Dairy quarry greywaeke,
Nuneaton quartzite

The rock types seen above were crushed down in a laboratory scale jaw crusher and split
into three size ranges to act as feed to the laboratory scale cone crusher. The feed ranges
used were -16 + 5.6mm, -11.2 + 5.6mm and -10 + 5.6mm. The eighty percent passing feed
size was obtained for each rock type and feed range.

A laboratory scale, single phase Massco cone crusher (see Plate 1), was then fed with the
differing size fractions. Enough feed was prepared to allow the cone crusher to reach the
choke fed condition and to then run for approximately 180 seconds.

During this time the power consumption was continually monitored using an EW 604
wattmeter recording via a Racal 14 channel recorder. The data obtained in this manner was
subsequently filtered to remove mains noise and then logged on to a Grant Squirrel data
logger.

The interpretation of the data was then performed by down loading the data into the
Statgraphics computer package, via Lotus 1-2-3. An example output is seen in Figure 1.

The power consumption combined with the throughput allows the kilowatt hour per tonne
consumption to be calculated.
Prediction of cone crusher performance 1245

Plate 1 Massco l a b o r a t o r y scale cone c r u s h e r

I
0.5

04

fX.I
.X
0"3
f_~
I---
t--.-- O'Z
<r.

C3
__1
I.---q
,,,I
0./

J . . . . . . . . . . : . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . ' . . . . . . . . . . . * . . . . . . L ~ . °

0 30 60 90 120 150 180


SECONDS
Fig.l Power consumption graph for the Cliffe Hill diorite with a feed size
of -16 + 5.6mm at a closed side setting of 4mm.
1246 R . A . BEARMAN et al.

The product obtained from each of the crushing tests was then sized to allow the
determination of the eighty percent passing size. From this suite of crushing tests, data
relating to power consumption, feed size and product size was recorded. In addition to these
parameters, the rock strength was then assessed using a wide variety of tests used in mining
and associated industries (see Table 2).

TABLE 2 Rock characterisation tests

Source of test Test

Mining/geotechnics uniaxial compressive strength, Brazilian tensile


strength, Point Load Index, Schmidt hammer,
Elastic modulus (static)

Quarrying Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV),Aggregate Impact


Value (AIV), 10% Fines,

Fracture mechanics Fracture toughness, Spall Fracture Strength,

Geophysics P and S wave velocities, Elastic modulus (dynamic),


Bulk modulus, Modulus of rigidity.

In order to determine which of the tests shown above can be used for predictive purposes
a regression analysis was applied. Table 3 lists the tests which correlate with power
consumption in laboratory scale cone crushing.

TABLE 3 Test parameters correlating with power consumption


at the 99.9% level or higher

Brazilian tensile strength


Fracture toughness
ACV
Point Load Index
10% Fines
AIV Spall
Fracture Strength

Table 4 shows the test parameters which were found to correlate with the eighty percent
passing size of product.

TABLE 4 Test parameters correlating with PeO at the 95% level or higher.

Point Load Index


Fracture toughness
ACV

DEVELOPMENT OF EQUATIONS FOR THE PREDICTION


OF LABORATORY SCALE CONE CRUSHER PERFORMANCE

An investigation of the effect of feed size and closed side setting on power consumption and
product size was undertaken. The findings of this study indicate that the feed size does not
have a significant effect on either the power consumption or product size over the normal
operating range of the laboratory scale cone crusher.

It was found that the closed side setting and the rock strength parameters (shown in Tables
3 and 4), are the controlling parameters when considering power draw and product size, i.e
Prediction o f cone crusher p e r f o r m a n c e 1247

the performance characteristics can be expressed as a function o f the closed side setting and
one of the controlling strength parameters:

Power consumption ffif(css, Kcb)

where:css - closed side setting (ram),


Kcb - fracture toughness ( M N / m 1.5).

When power consumption is plotted against fracture toughness for a variety of settings the
graph seen in Figure 2 is produced.

I CSSffi4.34MM ""
• ~ ---- --X
-x- C S S = 2 . IBMM : ./~ // :

£.
r-

" i
Z
0

~-
O. 0
-.)

Z
0
rr
~ ,

o 0 - .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ; . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . •

- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ . _

I , , , , I , , , , I , ~ , ~ I , , I

0 1 2 3 4
FRACTURE TOUGHNESS (MN/m ^ 1.5)

Fig.2 Power consumption versus fracture toughness for a


variety of rock types.

Thus the general form of the equation is:

Power ffi m Kcb + C

where: m - slope
c - intercept
Kcb - fracture toughness ( M N / m 1.s)

To obtain an equation applicable to all closed side settings within the normal operating
range the slope and constant need to be expressed as a function of the closed side setting.
This is achieved by plotting the slope/constant for each closed side setting against the
individual closed side settings. This produces an equation of the form:

Power = f(css) Kcb + f(css)

where css - closed side setting (ram),


Kcb - fracture toughness ( M N / m 1-5)

HE 4 : 1 2 - D
Power Power Powe.r o
="

rl
tr

~• ~ ~-~
o

g ~
Prediction of cone crusher performance 1249

,. b.

-- ~.~g .-.~7
CSS O2S
C.

ALW
C~S

Fig.5 P o w e r vs. CSS vs. A C V

.
b.

a-
~- IS50 ISSO
CSS CSS
C.

--'-'----'-- ISSO
CSS

Fig.6 P o w e r vs. CSS vs. P o i n t load i n d e x


1250 R . A . BEARMAN et al.

~. ]D.

CSS IC~ flues ~ CSS I0~ flmes

C.

fLu~
C~S

Fig.7 P o w e r vs. CSS vs. 10% fines

a. ]3.

AiV F

CSS css
C.

!l
---- AIV
CSS

Fig.8 P o w e r vs. CSS vs. A I V


Prediction of cone crusher performance 1251

. b.

~tS - SFS
CSS CSS
O.

SFS
CSS
Fig.9 Power vs. CSS vs. Spall Fracture strength

The same procedure can be applied to the prediction of the eighty percent passing product
size. Figures 10-12 (a)-(c) show the three dimensional response surface plots representing
the equations produced using the differing strength parameters.

;~L. b.

PS0 PS0

I~60 ~ ~50
CSS CSS

PS0'I

i=50
CSS
Fig.10 P80 vs. CSS vs. point load index
1252 R . A . BEARMAN et al.

. h.

P80 . ,.. . . . . . . , P80


• .j.. . - •
"''"..[.: 'i ' ~ " ¢

Kcb
CSS CSS
O,

P80

Kcb
CSS
Fig.l I P8o vs. CSS vs. fracture toughness

. b.

PsoI
n ~ v r
I
CSS CSS
O ,

PsoI
CSS

Fig.12 Pso vs. CSS vs. ACV


Prediction of cone crusher performance 1253

In Figures 3-9 and 10-12, the following labelling is used:


a) -16 + 5.6mm feed,
b) -11.2 + 5.6mm feed,
c) -10 +5.6mm feed.

From the examination of these figures, the effect of feed size is seen to be negligible.

DEVELOPMENT OF EQUATIONS TO PREDICT PRODUCT GRADING CURVES

The prediction of the eighty percent passing size of product is of great use in the design and
selection of crushing circuits. Knowledge of the entire product grading curve is also
important.

Existing methods of estimating product grading include the Gaudin-Schuhmann (GS), [5],
and Rosin-Rammler-Bennett (RRB), [6]. Both these methods rely on certain descriptors
within the equation being known. The GS equation is seen below:

F(x) = (x/x') n

where: F(x) - cumulative size distribution,


x - particle size (mm),
X' - reference particle size (mm),
n - characteristic exponent of the distribution.

This equation tends to expand the data below 50% and contract the data above 50%, this
effect is more pronounced at the extremes of the distribution.

The alternative is the RRB method which expands the range below 25% and above 75%,
whilst contracting the range 30-60%. The RRB equation is seen below:

In In ( I / ( I - Y ) ) = n In X - n In Xo

where: Y - fraction of cumulative undersize,


n - slope of the RRB graph at 63.21% cumulative undersize,
X - size fraction (ram),
Xo - size fraction at 63.21% cumulative undersize.

In terms of crushing the RRB method is the most applicable as the range over which it is
most accurate is that which applies to crushing.

To apply the RRB equation the descriptors Xo and n must be predicted. It has been shown
during this project that these descriptors can be predicted using fracture toughness and
closed side setting. The mathematical procedure for obtaining these predictive equations is
similar to that used earlier in the text to produce equations for power consumption and
eighty percent passing size of product.

Figures 13 (a) and (b) show the response surface plots representing the predictive equations
for estimating the descriptors applying to full scale crushing using the Pegson 900 Autocone.

GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION FOR THE DESIGN AND SELECTION


OF CRUSHING CIRCUITS

The study undertaken has shown that the geotechnical assessment of a deposit prior to plant
installation is essential. A study of the rock strength using a variety of rock mechanics tests
gives a good indication of the power requirements, eighty percent passing size of product
and the product grading.
1254 R. A. BEARMAN et al.

&. PREDICTION OF RRB Xo INTERCEPT

!
0
X

I . . . . . w I ~ ~ ~ iI ~

Kcb (MN/m"1.5)

CLOSED SIDE SETTING (mm)

b.
PREDICTION OF RRB SLOPE 'n'

.o • • . .. . . . . . . . .

• , • .

KcD (MN/m'I.5)

CLOSED SIDE SETTING (mm)

Fig.13 Prediction of RRB Descriptors


Prediction of cone crusher performance 1255

Pegson Ltd. realise the potential of the geotechnics approach and have integrated this
approach into their plant design and selection procedure.

Pegson Ltd. now provide a full geological and geotechnical assessment of the rock type to
be crushed. The data obtained for this purpose includes fracture toughness, compressive
strength, point load strength index, ACV, AIV and 10% fines.

After experimental work covering jaw crushing and scale up factors, equations applicable
to all models of Pegson jaw and cone crushers is now available.

The knowledge of these strength parameters combined with the proposed operating
conditions and machinery allow a detailed picture of crusher performance to be obtained.
A picture which is further enhanced by the use of expert systems shells developed by
Pegson Ltd., which aid the engineer in the selection of crushers and screens, [7]. Expert
system applications of this type are being expanded to include circuit simulation and fault
finding.

CONCLUSIONS

The co-operative research project between Pegson Ltd. and the Camborne School of Mines
has revealed the following:

. Power consumption and eighty percent passing size of product can be predicted for
laboratory scale cone crushers based on rock mechanics tests and closed side settings.

. In laboratory scale cone crushing the feed size does not affect the power consumption
or product size over the normal operating range.

. Power consumption and product size equations produced using a laboratory scale
cone crusher can be scaled up to predict the performance of Pegson 900 and 1200
Autocone crushers.

. The Rosin-Rammler-Bennett grading estimation method can now be used as a tool


to predict product grading in full scale cone crushing. The descriptors Xo and n
being estimated using a combination of fracture toughness and closed side setting.

. Use of geotechnical characterisation of rock strength can now provide information


essential to the design and selection of crushing circuits.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Camborne School of Mines for the use of their
laboratory and computing facilities. In addition the assitance of the experimental officers
Mr A. Clark and Mr M. Wyglendacz is gratefully acknowledged.

REFERENCES

. Kick F., Das gesetz der proportiolalen winderstande und seine anwendugen, Leipzig
(1885).

2. Rittinger von P.R., Lebruch der aufbereitungskunde, Berlin (1867).

3. Bond F.C., Crushing and grinding calculations, Allis Chalmers publication


07R923513. (1961 ).
1256 R . A . BEARMAN et al.

. Bearman R.A., Pine R.J. and Wills B.A., Use of fracture toughness testing in
characterising the commminution potential of rock. IMM/MMIJ Sym. Today's
Technology for the Mining and Metallurgical Industries. Kyoto, Japan, 161-180
(October 1989).

. Schuhmann R., Principles of comminution. Part 1 Size distribution and surface


calculations. Trans. AIME, Pub. 1189 (1940).

6. Bennett J.G., Broken Coal. J. Instit. Fuel, 10, 22-39 (1936).

. Bearman R.A., Barley R.W. & Hitchcock A., The development of a comminution
index for rock and the use of an expert system to assist the engineer in predicting
crushing requirements. Minerals Eng., 3, No 1/2, 117-127, (1990).

You might also like