Laboratory Exercise No.

5
PROFILE LEVELING

Time of Day and Date: 11/14/23

2 PM
Weather Condition: Sunny/Clear
List of Equipment:
o Automatic Level, Leveling Rod, Measuring Tape, Hubs or Pegs, Range
Pole, Markers.

Objective/s:
o To determine the elevation of ground points along the centerline of a
proposed roadway

Procedure:
1. Establish stakes at every full station along the centerline of a 300-meters
Long-proposed roadway at intervals of 20 meters.

Figure 1. Profile Leveling Level Route

2. Set up and level the instrument in some convenient location on one side of
the proposed roadway the take a backsight reading BMa.
3. Take an intermediate foresight reading from as many centerlines point up to
within the practical limit of the sighting.
4. Establish a turning point and take a foresight reading on it to determine its
elevation.
5. Transfer and set up the instrument in another position and take a backsight
reading on the turning point then continue taking rod readings on ground
point as before until the end if the roadway is reached (Figure 2).

ElevTP1= HIbma-FAtpi
= 12.51m – 2.37m = 10.14
HItp1 = ELEVtpi – Bstpi
 = 10.14m + 1.44m = 11.58
Elev 0+45 =HItp1 – Ifs0+45
= 11.58m - 1.435m = 10.145m
Elev0+45 = HItp1 – IFS0+50
= 11.58m - 1.48m = 10.1m
Elev0+55 = HItp1 -IFS0+55
= 11.58m – 1.36m = 10.22m
Elev0+60 = HItp1 – IFS0+60
= 11.58m – 0.30m = 11.28m
ElevTP2 = HItp1 – IFS0+60
= 11.58m - 0.30m = 11.28m

Laboratory Report

Introduction

Profile leveling served as a foundational surveying technique

used to systematically analyze elevation differences along a preset the
profile's route. This procedural approach encompasses a meticulous
series of measurements, including backsight, foresight, and precise
topographical presentation. In the context of this lab report, our
investigation centers on an in-depth exploration of the principles and
application if profile leveling, elucidated through a comprehensive
analysis of the equation provided. These mathematical expression
function as a guiding framework, facilitating a nuanced understanding
of the intricate processes involved in determining elevation at specific
points along the surveyed profile. The objective if this report is to
unravel the practical insight inherent in profile leveling, shedding light
in its pivotal role in surveying application and its capacity to furnish
accurate depictions of elevation insight, laying the groundwork for
informed decision-making within the realm of surveying endeavors.
Result

The obtained information offers a thorough reference for the

vertical variances between the examined places and is arranged in a
methodical table of observed rod reading. In table 1, shows the
computed measurements from the readings in each of the points to
where the rod and the reading instrument is set, and sighted.

The provided sequence encapsulates a comprehensive profile

leveling analysis, systematically detailing the calculation of elevation at
various critical points along the surveyed profile. Commencing with
the benchmark setup, the Height if Instrumental at Benchmark A is
established by summing the elevation if Benchmark A with associated
backsight Reading, resulting in an initial value if 12.51m. Subsequent
intermediate points are then evaluated by subtracting the foresight
reading from the HI unveiling a range of elevation from 11.785m to
10.47m for IFS to IFS.

The analysis concludes that the calculation in Turning Point 2,

mirroring the approach applied at
TP1. The elevation of TP2 is computed as 10.44m. In essence, this series
of equations serves as a meticulous guide for understanding the
changing elevation along the surveyed profile, incorporating both
backsights and foresights to ensure a comprehensive depiction of the
terrain’s topography. The differences presented in the sequence of
equations offer crucial insight into varying elevation, along the
surveyed profile.

Moving along the profile, the difference between the HI and the
intermediate foresight readings at difference points provide a
comprehensive view of the changing terrain. These differences, ranging
from IFS to IFS underscore the fluctuation in elevation as the survey
progresses at turning point 1, the difference between the HIBMA and
the foresight reading results in a change of addition if the backsight
reading contributes to the difference in Height of Instrumental at TP1,
amounting to 15.5m. As the survey extends beyond TP1, the difference
between the HI and foresight readings unveils the ascending and
descending nature of terrain. Notably, the difference at turning point
indicates a descent of 0.858m to the new point.

A thorough narrative of the topographical changes is provided

by these elevation discrepancies at each stage of the profile leveling
process, which is essential for accurate terrain representation and
subsequent decision-making in many surveying and engineering
applications.
Conclusion

Profile leveling is a fundamental aspect of surveying and

mapping, offering crucial insights into the topography of a terrain.
Through meticulous measurements along a designated line, it provides
a detailed cross-sectional view, highlighting elevation changes and
slope variations. This data is essential for engineering projects, road
design, and land development, ensuring accurate assessments for
construction and infrastructure planning.

The proficiency in profile leveling not only lies in technical skills

but also in the ability to interpret and apply the gathered information
effectively. It serves as a cornerstone in creating contour maps, aiding
in visualizing the landscape's features. The precision attained through
profile leveling contributes to sustainable and efficient development
practices.

In conclusion, profile leveling stands as a key technique in surveying,

empowering professionals with the necessary tools to understand and
manipulate the earth's surface for the benefit of diverse projects and
applications in the realm of surveying and mapping.
 Group Profile:
Leader: Jhon Carlo Labadan
Assistant Leader: Jhon Pol Baldoza
Recorder: Jared Cabanog
Group Members:
o Jan Angelo Padecio
o Ranjee Delarmente

Documentation: