Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Dap An de de Xuat - Tieng Anh 11 - Chy 2022
Dap An de de Xuat - Tieng Anh 11 - Chy 2022
TRƯỜNG THPT CHUYÊN HƯNG YÊN KHU VỰC DUYÊN HẢI & ĐỒNG BẰNG BẮC BỘ
LẦN THỨ XIII
ĐÁP ÁN MÔN: TIẾNG ANH - LỚP 11
ĐỀ ĐỀ XUẤT ĐÁP ÁN
Thời gian làm bài: 180 phút, không kể thời gian giao đề
Part 4.
16. one-size-fits-all education
17. micro-marking, micro-assessing
18. a blended learning approach
19. trailblazer
20. one-one-one
21. keep better tabs on
22. widening the digital divide
23. currently are under-resourced
24. have an appetite for
25. a hybrid classroom
II. LEXICO-GRAMMAR (30 POINTS)
Part 1.
1. B 2. B 3. D 4. A 5. A
6. B 7. D 8. A 9. A 10. D
11. C 12. D 13. C 14. C 15. A
16. C 17. A 18. D 19. C 20. D
Part 2.
1. disaffected 6. fortuitous
2. befriend 7. dispirited
3. hard-luck 8. servitude
4. demystify 9. altercation
5. forebears 10. page-turning
Part 2.
Source: adapted from Mindset for IELTS 3 (PAGE 80)
1. path 6. but
2. settling 7. against
3. onward(s) 8. backdrop
4. old 9. which
5. However 10. least
Part 3.
Source: TOEFL SCORE IELTS BOOSTER (PAGE 360)
1. A 2. D 3. C 4. A 5. B
6. A 7. C 8. B 9. A 10. D
Part 4.
Source: adapted from IELTS LONGMAN PRACTICE TEST PLUS 2 (page 27)
1. viii 2. iv 3. ix 4. vi 5. x 6. v
13. Y
Part 5.
Source: On screen c2 student book
1. A 2. D 3. B 4. C 5. D
6. A 7. D 8. E 9. B 10. C
Presenter: Breaking news tonight. The shootings are not stopping as president Joe Biden is asking for tougher gun
laws across the country. Several people were shot at a cemetery in Wisconsin during a funeral service and a
reported shooting near a church in Iowa has left at least two people dead. What the president wants to see would
drastically change gun ownership across the country and here in Georgia John Shearick joining us live tonight,
from the Georgia state capitol. And John, local republicans are standing by their convictions on this issue.
Reporter: Georgia republicans in the legislature standing firm making sure there are few
gun restrictions in state law while the president urging Congress to go after the guns in federal law. Call it his
“enough” speech, President Biden's impassioned plea to congress to act now to fight violent crimes that are
committed with guns.
Presesident: “I’ve been in this fight for a long time I know how hard it is but I’ll never give up and if congress
fails, I believe this time a majority of American people won't give up either. I believe the majority of you will act
to turn your outrage into making this
issue central to your vote. Enough. Enough. Enough.”
Reporter: The president urged republicans to agree to several proposals including a ban on assault rifles and high-
capacity magazines, background checks on all gun buyers, a
safe storage law with criminal penalties, red flag laws. Georgia’s eight republican
members of the house have opposed those proposals representative. Barry Loudermilk telling us after the
President's speech that he supports instead, advanced school security, effective mental health intervention, better
tools and training for law enforcement to combat crime and representative Austin Scott: “fellows don't
follow the law Biden’s proposed actions only attack law-abiding citizens”
“Guns aren't responsible for shooting”, John Monroe with Georgia’s second amendment- “we’ve got a mental
health problem in this country that needs to be addressed. It's people who are pulling the trigger the guns aren't
shooting themselves and that's what we need to concentrate on is the people that are shooting and not
the guns.”
The president is on the hunt for 10 senate republicans to vote with him on these
proposals or some versions of these proposals, 10 being the number that would
be needed to pass them along with all of the senate democrats.
Part 2.
TIME's Person of the Year is not an award. It is a marker of influence. It is a reflection of impact, a way to capture
the meaning of a moment. It is a chance to recognize the people who led us or even enraged us, the people who
amused or inspired us. In this show, we'll recognize the Athlete and Entertainers of the year, the heroes who fought
for us, and the visionary who captured our attention.
All of these people and moments encapsulate 2021, today and in the years to come.
Faced with crisis after crisis, we proved we are creative and resilient, with a long history of extracting the possible
from the impossible. Humanity stands at a chaotic crossroads, but we do so armed with strength and clarity of
purpose and an eye always on the future because inspiration and innovation continue to rewrite our story and
extend our story to the stars themselves. This year, new voices and images demanded our attention while we got
our first glimpse of the metaverse to come.
And at the close of 2021, we continue to wrestle with the reality of COVID-19's impact on everything from
the global economy to our holiday traditions, but it has also taught us that humanity can rise above, that our fight
against hate and inequity continues to make progress, and that together, we can be better. And for nearly 100 years,
TIME has been there to cover it, to document it and to consistently show the world what the word influence means.
This is TIME's Person of the Year.
Part 3.
M1: According to media reports, the government’s thinking about harnessing the popularity of gyms in a
campaign to tackle the problem of obesity. What’s your take on that?
F: Well there are, on the face of it, attractive aspects to the proposal. The obesity epidemic is, if we’re to
believe the figures, a social emergency and, as many people have argued, the government has so far
concentrated largely on the eating aspect of prevention – school dinners, junk-food ads, food labelling – but
exercise must be made part of the solution. Yet there are other significant issues, aren’t there Rob?
M2: Let’s face it. The kind of collective problems we face with obesity and inactivity require hugely complex
solutions, and that means involving a whole host of stakeholders and bodies. It’s not that the fitness industry can't
play a part, it’s just that we have some serious reservations about the government teaming up with the leisure
industry, which generally serves those people who are already the least likely to be inactive and obese.
F: The bottom line is that you’re looking at a majority of the adult population that's inactive. I have no problem
with gyms delivering their health-and-fitness and leisure products; I'm a consumer of them, but they're ill-equipped
to tackle the wider issues.
M1: But even for those who can afford to go to gyms regularly, isn’t the whole enterprise full of
contradictions?
F: Indeed it is. Personal trainers may make you more motivated and fit, but they can't make you too
motivated or too fit or you'd stop needing them. It isn't in a gym's interest to encourage you to build exercise
into your daily life, because that would cut into gym hours. It’s true that they’re often the only option in
cities, if there are few parks, no bike lanes, bad weather or whatever, but it’s also true that gyms have a
vested interest in keeping you indoors.
M1: And gyms come in for a lot of criticism for their marketing already, don’t they Heidi?
F: Well, the temptation for the gym is to sign up as many people as possible, then gamble on them not
turning up – a kind of fitness pyramid scheme. That's absolutely true of some gyms, but not the majority. A
business model that's almost entirely reliant on revenue from membership dues means that it's in their interest
to sign up a lot of people. But if everyone who was a member turned up, then they'd be overcrowded and the
facilities themselves wouldn't hold up. There's a calculated risk obviously, but good clubs will take that into
account, and use reasonably accurate projections. They know that people will go at different times of day, in
terms of their occupations and their personal lives etc. And the aim of the game at the end of the day is to
hang on to them, so you don’t want them turning up and finding all the equipment’s occupied.