Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1994
Copyririghl c 1994 Elsncr Sacna Ltd
Prinkd in Great Britain All rights reserved
0031 9422i94 5600+0.00
Medicinal Chemistry Division, Central Drug Research Institute, Lucknow, 226001, India
Abstract-A new triterpenoid saponin, bacoside A,, a constituent of bacosides, the saponin mixture of Bacopa
monniera, was isolated and characterized. Its structure was established as 3-/i-[O-/l-D-glucopyranosyl( l-+3)-O-[a-L-
arabinofuranosy(1 +2)]-0-/?-D-glucopyranosyl)oxy] jujubogenin by chemical and spectral analyses. The cis-isomer of
ebelin lactone was also obtained as one of the artefacts of the aglycone and its structure revised.
133
134 S. RASTOGI et al.
OH
ROT RO
3a R=H
4 R=H
3b R=Ac
* Hf/Hg
were also indicative of the presence of two hexosyl and existed in the pyranose form, whereas the arabinose unit
one pentosyl units, attached to one another. Acid hy- was present in the furanose form. Assignments of the
drolysis of the permethylated bacoside A, yielded par- signals were made on the basis of broad band decoupled
tially methylated sugars which were identified as 2,3,4,6- as well as DEPT “CNMR spectra [lfl. The chemical
tetra-0-methylglucos, 2,3,5-tri-O-methylarabinose and shift assignments were made straightaway by comparison
4,6-di-0-methylglucose by the CC-MS analyses of their with the reported values of O-methyl-a-L-arabinofurano-
alditol acetates [lS]. The identified partially methylated side and 0-methyl-/?-D-glucopyranoside, taking into con-
sugars correspond to a 1,2,3-linked glucose, a terminal sideration the a- and &eKects of glycosidation. *3C NMR
arabinofuranose and a terminal glucose. Further, in order chemical shifts of the aglycone portion including that of
to determine the exact linkage of the terminal sugar units, C-3 were also consistent with those assigned to the
bacoside A, was subjected to Mannich hydrolysis [ 163 to jujubogenin portion of the saponins isolated from Colu-
yield a diglycoside. Only the arabinose unit was lost, as brina asiatico [18] (Table l), indicating that the sugar
confirmed by the TLC of the aqueous portion of the chain was linked to jujubogenin at C-3.
hydrolysate and the positive FAB-mass spectrum of the In the ‘H NMR spectrum of bacoside A,, the anomeric
diglycoside, which exhibited major peaks at m/z 817,801 proton signals for two /?-D-glucopyranosyl units ap
and 779 corresponding to the presence of [M -Hz0 peared at 64.31 (d, J = 7 Hz) and 4.35 (d. J = 7 Hz) and
+K]+, [M-H,O+Na]+ and [M-H,O+H]+ ions, that for the arabinofuranosyl unit at 65.23 (bs).
respectively. The diglycoside was subjected to permethyl- Thus, on the basis of the above evidence, the structure
ation followed by acid hydrolysis. The resulting partially of bacoside A, was established as 3-B-[@B-D-glucopy-
methylated sugars were identified as 2,3,4,6-tetra-O- ranosyl( l-+3)-0-[rx-L-arabinofuranosyl(l -r2)]-O-B-~-glu-
methylglucose and 2,4,6-tri-O-methylglucose by GC-MS copyranosyl)-oxyljujubogenin (5).
analyses of their alditol acetates [ 151. The formation of
2,4,6-tri-0-methylglucose indicated the presence of a free
FXPERIMENTAL
-OH group at C-2 of the inner glucopyranosyl unit of the
diglycoside, which was, however, absent in that of bac- Plant material. Bacopa monniera (whole plant) was
oside A,. The arabinose unit was therefore attached at C- procured from Calcutta market (India). A voucher speci-
2 of the inner glucose unit. These methylation studies men of the plant is preserved in the herbarium of Botany
clearly indicated that the terminal glucopyranosyl unit Division, CDRI.
and the terminal arabinofuranosyl unit were attached to General. Mps: uncorr. IR: KBr disc. UV: EtOH.
the inner glucopyranosyl unit through l-+3 and l-+2 ‘H NMR: 400 MH& TMS as int. standard. 13C NMR:
linkages, respectively, and the inner glucopyranosyl unit 100 MHz. CC: silica gel, bondapak C,, and neutral
was attached to the aglycone through an 0-glycosidic alumina. TLC: (i) silica gel coated plates using solvent
linkage. system: (1) C,H,-MeOH (96:4); (2) EtOAc-MeOH-
The above inference was further confirmed by the 13C Hz0 (80: 10: 10); (3) EtOAc-MezCO-Hz0 (50:40: 10);
and ‘HNMR chemical shifts of bacoside A,. The (ii) reverse phase-C,, coated plates (E. Merck) using
13CNMR spectrum established that the glucose units solvent system (4) MeCN-Hz0 (50:50); (iii) cellulose
coated plates using solvent system (5) n-BuOH-
AcOH-H,O (40: 10:50). PC: Whatman No. 1 paper and
solvent (6) n-BuOH satd with H,O. Silica gel TLC were
Table 1. 13C NMR spectral data of bacoside A, (CD,OD)
visualized by spraying with 1% ceric sulphate in 1 M
Aglycone part Sugar part
H,SO* followed by heating at 1lo”, and PC and cellulose
-_-- TLC chromatograms by spraying with aniline phthalate
C C C reagent followed by heating at 110”.
Isolation. T’he bacosides mixt. was obtained from the
1 39.9 16 111.4 Glc 1’ 104.2 ethanolic extract of the plant according to the method
2 21.3 17 54.4 2 78.2 described earlier [ll]. It was repeatedly chromato-
3 90.7 18 19.2 3’ 83.6 graphed over silica gel by gradient elution with EtOAc
4 40.5 19 16.8 4 IQ.3
satd with Hz0 containing increasing amounts of
5 57.5 20 69.4 5 78.1
MezCO-Hz0 (40: 10) to yield a fr. rich in bacoside A,.
6 19.2 21 29.6 6 62.6
This fr. (900 mg) was subjected to flash chromatography
7 37.1 22 45.4 Glc 1” 105.5
8 38.5 23 69.7 2” 75.5 over a column of Bondapak Cl8 using MeCN-Hz0
9 54.2 24 126.3 3” 77.2 (30: 70) as the eluent to yield pure bacoside A, (120 mg).
10 38.0 25 136.7 4” 71.7 Bacoside A,. Amorphous solid; Fiegel’s test for carbo-
11 22.5 26 25.8 5” 71.6 hydrates positive. IR eicm-‘: 3400 (OH), 2920, 1630
12 29.2 27 18.4 6” 62.7 (C=C), 1550, 1370 and 1030. Positive FAB-MS m/z: 951
13 38.3 28 28.3 Ara 1”’ 109.9 [M +Na]+, 455 [aglycone-H,O]‘. Negative FARMS
14 54.6 29 16.8 2”’ 84.1 m/z: 927 [M-H]-, 795 CM-H-1321 and 765 [M-H
15 36.9 30 66.9 3”’ 80.0 - 1621. ‘H NMR (400 MHz, DMSO-d,): 60.72, 0.75,
4” 87.4
0.91,0.93, 1.00, 1.58, 1.66(each 3H,s, 7 x Me),4.31 (lH, d,
5”’ 62.1
5=7Hz,GlcH-1’),4.35(1H,d,J=7Hz,GlcH-1”),5.23
Bacoside A, from Bucopa nwnniera 137
fluxed with 2 h4 HCl in 80% aq. EtOH (0.5 ml) for 4 hr. 3. Singh, H. K. and Dhawan, B. N. (1982) J. Ethnophar-
Hydrolysate was then diluted with H,O, freed of EtOH macol. 5, 205.
by evapn and further heated at 100” for 1 hr. It was then 4. Singh, H. K., Rastogi, R. P., Srimal, R. C. and
neutralized with Amberlite IR 400 (CO:-) resin, coned to Dhawan, B. N. (1988) Phytother. Res. 2, 70.
0.5 ml and stirred with NaBH., (15 mg) at room temp. 5. Kulshreshtha, D. K. and Rastogi, R. P. (1973) Phyto-
After 2 hr Amberlite IR 120 (H+) resin was added to chemistry 12, 887.
maintain the pH at 3.5 and the mixt. was filtered, evapd 6. Kawai, K., Itaka, Y., Shibata, S., Kulshreshtha, D. K.
and co-distilled with 3 portions (5 ml each) of MeOH. and Rastogi, R. P. (1973) Acta Cryst. 829, 2947.
The resulting mixt. of alditols was treated with Ac,O and 7. Kulshreshtha, D. K. and Rastogi, R. P. (1974) Phyto-
pyridine (0.5 ml, each) for 2 hr at 100” and the reagents chemistry 13, 1205.
were removed by co-distillation with toluene. The residue 8. Chandel, R. S., Kulshreshtha, D. K. and Rastogi, R.
containing the alditol acetates was subjected to GC-MS P. (1977) Phytochemistry 16, 141.
using a GLC column containing 3% of OV-1 at 160”. The 9. Kulshreshtha, D. K. and Rastogi, R. P. (1973) Phyto-
results are summarized in Table 2. chemistry 12, 2074.
Pennethylation and preparation ofalditol acetates of the 10. Jain, P. and Kulshreshtha, D. K. (1993) Phyto-
diglycoside, obtained by Mannich hydrolysis of bacoside chemistry 33, 449.
A,. The diglycoside was permethylated, the product 11. Chatterjee, N., Rastogi, R. P. and Dhar, M. L. (1963)
hydrolysed, and the resulting partially methylated sugars Ind. J. Chem. 1, 212.
were converted into their alditol acetates according to the 12. Kulshreshtha, M. J. and Rastogi, R. P. (1972) Ind. J.
procedure described above for bacoside A,. Results are Chem. 10, 152.
summarized in Table 3. 13. Eade, R. A., Ellis, J., Shannon, J. S., Simes, H. V. and
Simes, J. J. H. (1970) Aust. J. Chem. 23, 2085.
Acknowledgements-The authors are grateful to Dr B. N. 14. Kawai, K., Akiyama, T., Ogihara, Y. and Shibata, S.
Mehrotra for identifying the plant material and to Mrs (1974) Phytochemistry 13, 2829.
Preeti Rastogi for Technical Assistance. They also thank 15. Jansson, P. E., Kenne, L., Liedgren, H., Lindberg, B.
the staff of the Regional Sophisticated Instrumentation and Longren, J. (1976) A Practical Guide to Methyl-
Centre, Lucknow for spectral data. ation Analyses of Carbohydrates No. 8. Chem. Com-
mun., Univ. Stockholm.
REFERENCES 16. Mannich, C. and Siewert, G. (1942) Ber. dt. Chem.
Ges. 75, 737.
1. Chopra, R. N. and Chopra, I. C. (1956) in Glossary of 17
Agrawal, P. K., Jain, D. C., Gupta, R. K. and Thakur,
Indian Medicinal Plants, p. 32. Counsil of Scientific ’
R. S. (1985) Phytochemistry 24, 2479.
and Industrial Research, New Delhi.
18. Wagner, H., Ott, S., Jurcic, K., Morton, J. and
2. Singh, H. K. and Dhawan, B. N. (1978) fnd. J.
Neszmelyi, A. (1983) Planta Med. 48, 136.
Pharmacol. 10, 72.
PIWTO36:1-J