IJCM 6 (3) pp.

281–290 Intellect Limited 2013

International Journal of Community Music

Volume 6 Number 3
© 2013 Intellect Ltd Article. English language. doi: 10.1386/ijcm.6.3.281_1

ViViane beineKe
UDESC

creative learning and

communities of practice:
Perspectives for music
education in the school

abStract KeywordS
This article discusses processes and practices of creative learning in musical educa- music education
tion in schools, reflecting on the contributions of this approach to the construction school
of communities of musical practice in the classroom. The discussion is based on a creative learning
case study carried out in a primary school in Porto Alegre, in southern Brazil. In communities of
this study, the creative learning is triggered in group-composition activities, through practice
collective musical presentation and criticism of the students’ productions. The music community music
teacher created the conditions needed to establish an environment of social relations children composition
that favours the construction of a community of musical practice in the classroom.
Over time, these forms of social participation configure an engaged and committed
community of musical practice, sharing ways of making and thinking about music.
Detailing this proposition, the role of the composition activities, presentation and
critical in the articulating process between the dimensions of creative learning are
analysed, considering the children’s perspective and the teacher’s role in this process,
reflecting on opportunities for teaching music in schools.

281
Viviane Beineke

This article discusses processes and practices of creative learning in musi-

cal education in schools, reflecting on the contributions of this approach to
the construction of communities of musical practice in the classroom. The
discussion is based on a study that investigated how the dimensions of crea-
tive learning are articulated in musical composition activities in the context of
music classes within a school curriculum (Beineke 2009).
Research on creativity is guided by different perspectives, focusing on different
aspects of creativity. This work has been framing and directing studies in the fields
of education, music education and more specifically, research on the composi-
tions of children and young people in different contexts of teaching and learning
throughout history. In this regard, studies on creativity can theoretically support
the teaching and learning of music composition within music education. Here
composition is understood quite broadly, including arrangements and musical
improvisations, small musical ideas spontaneously organized with the intention
of communicating thoughts or more elaborate musical pieces, with or without the
use of notation, or any other registration of the composition (Swanwick 1994).
The theoretical reference was based on studies about creative learning, an
emergent concept in the Education and Music Education areas, which focus
on the development of creativity in children during learning situations (Craft
2005; Burnard 2006; Craft et al. 2008; Jeffrey and Woods 2009). The expres-
sion creative learning means that the learning occurs within specific areas,
involving the acquisition of technical skills, information and technology that
empower the development of creativity (Feldman 2008). The teaching of
music, in this approach emphasizes the involvement of students in experi-
mentation, innovation and invention, and intellectual enquiry, which means,
learning music as a field of knowledge (Feldman 2008).
This approach is oriented in a sociocultural perspective, pointing out that:
creativity depends on the interaction of cultural and social factors that interact
in the formation of children (Burnard 2006); shifts the focus of creative prod-
ucts and processes, focusing on the social context in which creativity emerges –
the classroom (Barrett 2003); considers the range of cultural practices, quality
of interaction and relationships between individuals and their social environ-
ments; and takes into consideration beliefs and meanings attributed by chil-
dren to musical creativity (Barrett 2003). As stated by R. L. Bitencourt et al.
(2008), the development of creative capacity of students through activities of
composition can form people able to intervene and transform their society
critically and consciously contributing to a more egalitarian development,
with less concentration of control and power.
In this approach, a growing movement is perceived; one that seeks to
understand the social and interactive dynamics in the classroom and the pros-
pects of those who learn through educational practices and scientific research.
Reflection about one’s own experiences and the search for shared spaces of
making/thinking music, emerge as an alternative to an education committed
to the meanings constructed individually and collectively from the experiences
of music composition.

Methodology
The study was conducted in community school in central area of Porto Alegre,
in southern Brazil, attended by a class of 23 students aged 7–9 years, and
Madalena was the music teacher. In this school the students had music classes
from first to eighth school year, with a weekly 50-minutes class. The music

282
 Creative learning and communities of practice

classes were held in a room equipped with various percussion instruments

such as xylophones, metallophones, tambourines, triangles, cymbals, drums
and recorders, a guitar and a piano. The physical space used was limited, but
for the small groups activities of composition the students also used the hall,
opposite to the music room.
There were two sets of musical composition activities: the first one, a
proposal for a composition arrangement for the song ‘Zabelinha’ (traditional
Brazilian song), and a composition elaboration using the pentatonic scale. The
central focus of the music classes was on the musical composition activities,
which were conducted in small groups and later presented to the class and
analysed collectively.
The interest in understanding the perspectives of students and that of the
teacher about creativity in music composition at school guided the construction
of the methodological design of the research. The method had a qualitative
nature and consisted in a case study. The data collection included: observa-
tion and recording on video of two sets of musical composition activities in
the class; focus groups with the students, in order to know their thoughts
and ideas about music, while watching the musical compositions of the class;
and semi-structured interviews and reflection interviews using video record-
ings with the participant class teacher. In these interviews, while watching
the recorded lectures themselves, the teacher was encouraged to reflect on
the senses and meanings attributed to creativity, the activities of composi-
tion in the classroom and the process of student participation in the observed
activities. With these strategies, we seek to contemplate the complexity of the
classroom, listening to children and the teacher so as to discuss creativity of
the activities of musical composition (Figure 1).
The results reveal that the creative learning, triggered in group composi-
tion activities, collective musical presentation and criticism of the students’
productions, favours the constitution of communities of musical practice in
the classrooms (Wenger 2008). As a community music practice, the music
class is thought of as a space to construct personal and communal expressions
of artistic, social, political and cultural concerns (Higgins 2012). From this
perspective, this article weaves approximations between musical processes
and practices in community music with the idea of communities of practice in
the music class, reflecting on opportunities for music education in schools.

Figure 1: Data collection design.

283
Viviane Beineke

The results reveal that the creative learning, triggered in group composi-
tion activities, collective musical presentation and criticism of the students’
productions, favours the constitution of communities of musical practice in
the classrooms (Wenger 2008). As a community music practice, the music
class is thought of as a space to construct personal and communal expres-
sions of artistic, social, political and cultural concerns (Higgins 2012). From
this perspective, this article weaves approximations between musical proc-
esses and practices in community with the idea of communities of practice in
the music class, reflecting on opportunities for teaching music in schools.

creatiVe learning in the MuSic claSSrooM

From the perspective of creative learning, the class can be understood as a
community of practice that is starting collectively in a specific domain: music.
According to E. Wenger (2008: 53), to participate in a community involves
negotiating the meanings of their practices, which implies: one active and
dynamic process built over time, a world of resistance and flexibility, the ability
to mutually affect and be affected, the involvement of a multitude of factors
and perspectives, the production of new resolutions so that these factors and
perspectives become convergent, the incompleteness of these resolutions,
which may be partial, ephemeral and specific to each situation. Thus, the
community in the classroom establishes the criteria and participates in the vali-
dation and recreating musical ideas in their musical practices, in the process in
which ideas of music are updated and incorporated by this community.
In this case study, the dimensions of creative learning are articulated
through the cycle established between the activities of composition in groups,
presentation of work to the class and musical criticism. Understanding musical
criticism widely, including analyses and suggestions of the children and the
teacher work presented in class. In this dynamic, Madalena and the children
were building a community of musical practice in the classroom. Detailing this
proposition, I analyse the role of the composition activities, presentation and
criticism in the articulation process within the dimensions of creative learning,
considering the children perspective and the teacher role in this process.

The children’s viewpoint

In the study, the activities of group composition represent an experimentation
space, exploring and updating the ideas of music with the children, allowing
the trade of musical ideas and social roles among children who favoured
the collaborative processes in music making. This activity was considered
enjoyable by children, engaging them in classes for several reasons: because
it serves the interest of playing instruments, it allows for the opportunity to
work with colleagues, the challenge of inventing their own music and working
autonomously. In the small groups composing process, children also attrib-
uted meaning to musical experiences lived within and outside the school,
expressing their ideas of music and building their identity inside the group.
In presentation times the compositions claimed the children’s ideas of
music built on small groups, reinforcing ideas already developed collectively
by the class or introducing new musical ideas. The performance in class also
valued the compositions of the children, giving them the responsibility to
show colleagues what they produced, knowing that they would be judged by
that. Stage–audience relationship established in the classroom also creates the

284
 Creative learning and communities of practice

opportunity for them to have their work recognized by peers, which, in fact, was
a process that, over time, helped to build the relevance of these activities. The
stage–audience relationship also added relevance to music class, connecting
children to musical practices socially legitimized, providing them with the
experience to place themselves in the position of an artist who performs in
public. This experience seems to have approached the children to a ‘musicians
world’, creating parallels between what musicians do in ‘real life’ and what
they did in school. The relevance of learning was enhanced by the challenge
and expectation generated by this activity, putting them in a position to take
risks. The presentations also configured as a space of awareness of the field,
when they realized how the audience was reacting to their compositions.
In the activities of music criticism children were encouraged to reflect on
the musical practices performed in class, playing the role of hearing criticism
of the compositions prepared by the class. In this moment the class also aggre-
gated value and relevance to the activities of musical composition, allowing
them to attribute meanings to their productions. The moment of musical
criticism allowed another form of social participation in class: the commu-
nity, favouring the construction of collective knowledge. In this activity the
children judging the colleagues work and building intersubjectively common
criteria to the community of musical practice in the classroom. Reflecting on
their experiences, the children’s ideas for music were revised in processes of
reiteration, acceptation or rejection, negotiating meanings of musical prac-
tices. According C. J. Martinazzo (2005), in the intersubjectively learning
process understanding does not mean blind adherence to someone else’s
ideas or submission to legitimizing a hegemonic discourse, but a central tenet
in establishing solidarity, interaction and socialization.

The role of the teacher

Madalena’s role in the group composition activities was to keep the organiza-
tion in the groups, ensuring the focus on the activity and fostering relation-
ship of respect among children. In order to make an effective collaboration in
the composing process, it was important to know the students well and how
they related to each other, considering the children’s individual characteristics,
leadership relations and status in the classroom, with the aim of maximizing
participation in work. The dynamic formation of the groups established by
Madalena provided opportunities to work in new partnerships, to swap tasks
with groups formed by children themselves and groups formed by her. All
this helped to diversify the forms of social participation in class. The way the
teacher led these issues favoured the building of positive social relationships
in the classroom, providing condition for students to feel confident in their
ability to perform the activities in class and to expose their ideas to the group.
It was also up to the teacher to select topics and relevant contents of interest
as well as to propose the composition activities.
The role of the teacher in the presentations was to secure the space so that
all children could participate in presentations and establish affective condi-
tions that enable them to take the risk of performing in the relationship stage–
audience established in class. Again, the quality of the shares in the group was
fundamental. The teacher managed relationships among students so that they
establish a joint participation in the work produced by the class, building with
them an environment that favours participation and collaboration. Madalena
pointed out the importance of the presentations on the learning process of

285
Viviane Beineke

the group, stressing the role of children as critical listeners and their ability
to make judgments of the work of colleagues who had performed. Offering
attentive listening to the students’ compositions, asking them to play once
more, improving the performance of the work or highlighting musical ideas
brought about by children, Madalena valued activities in the classroom. She
also increased the relevance of these activities when she talked to the children
about their responsibility to the public that attended them, relating experi-
ences in the classroom with the practices of musicians. The recognition of the
teacher as an artist, acknowledged by the children, increased her reliability
and the legitimacy of her speech.
The role of the teacher in critical musical activities was to mediate discus-
sions between the children in the construction of learning in the classroom.
Madalena played the role of managing this moment, developing a friendly
atmosphere for students to interact as well as an environment of social
engagement, commitment and mutual respect in the classroom so that chil-
dren feel safe to express their ideas.
The teacher participated in field activities, in the construction analysis and
musical critique. Thus, she was able to expand the ideas of music to the children.
She also emphasized musical features to the composition process submitted
by students, drawing attention to the musical ideas introduced by them. At
certain times, the musical ideas initially rejected by the group were questioned
by the teacher. Then, based on their knowledge and musical experiences, she
explained the musical context proposing the appreciation of a varied reper-
toire and new forms of musical listening. This happened, for example, when
working on a student’s composition the teacher established relationships with
songs that somehow resembled what the children had done.
As P. Burnard and B. A. Younker (2004) point out, the students’ experi-
ences of talking and thinking about the action reveal how processes differ in
children’s composition, but this process needs to be promoted and under-
stood by the teacher. In this sense, children’s compositions and their musical
criticism also allowed the teacher to acquire knowledge about how children
thought their musical experiences and how they engaged in the classroom
proposals, providing important information for planning future activities and
monitoring students’ learning processes.
It is also important to consider that the events in classroom are always
natural and circumstantial, subject to unforeseen situations or deter-
mined by the context (e.g., class time, which often does not correspond to
the time required to compose, perform or analyse the work). The way each
work reflected in the group is related to multiple factors such as: manage-
ment of class time, the availability of the teacher to listen to children; the way
Madalena understood the production of children, the meanings that children
assigned to the compositions produced or group relationships and leadership
status among students.
Thus, children’s compositions reflect the encounters, influences but also the
tensions arisen in the negotiation of musical ideas among students and in the
forms of social participation in class during the process of teaching and learning.

coMMunitieS of Practice in the MuSic claSSrooM

Throughout the music lessons, children gave a new meaning to their experi-
ences as composers, performers and critical audience. It was also observed
that the children adapted the compositions according to the abilities of their

286
 Creative learning and communities of practice

colleagues to perform them, revising those ideas that the group was not able
to play. Thus, the group composition activity enables participation in different
levels of difficulty as the instrumental performance. For K. Sawyer (2008: 57),
‘this characteristic of the collaborative music making allows all learners to
participate meaningfully regardless of their level; naturally propelling the
children towards a growing appropriation, mastery, and central participation
in the musical activity’.
As explained B. Jeffrey and P. Woods (2009), in creative learning the
acquisition of technical skills is important to students because they develop
them while using them to develop their projects. According to the authors, it
encourages children experimentation, aiming the perfection and mastery of
skills required in their creative projects, in a process that keeps them moti-
vated to continue to develop their skills. In collaborative activities, as Sawyer
(2008) highlighted, children acquire more than musical mechanisms: they
develop abilities for interaction, and learn to listen and respond appropriately,
to collaborate and communicate in social contexts.
The movement of the cycle of musical activities can be triggered at
any moment in the classroom. That is because the production of every
composition, every presentation and every music activity, can renew the crea-
tive learning process itself and continue the composing cycle, present and
criticize music work, transformed by shared musical experiences in the class-
room. As Martinazzo explains (2005), dimension of knowledge of the process
of understanding among people about something (the musical ideas of the
children), always provisional, is more valued than the product being achieved.
According to the author, this shared understanding process underpins the
formation of emancipating, democratic, social and pedagogical constructions,
where teachers and students can become subjects/actors of learning together.
Furthermore, it is necessary to consider the role of the teacher, because
she works on this process, questioning, guiding, expanding the musical
ideas to the children and giving them the opportunities to participate and
build a musical practice community in the classroom. She created the condi-
tions needed to establish an environment of social relations that encourage
dialogue, commitment to the group’s learning process, mutual collaboration
and the engagement of interests, always valuing the contributions of the chil-
dren in the learning process. In this process, as pointed by Jeffrey and Woods
(2009), the teacher created the conditions to establish an environment of
positive social relationships, commitment to the group learning processes,
mutual collaboration, engagement interest and appreciation of the children
contributions.
In those lessons, the activities of composition, including the proposition
of an activity by the teacher, the time for small group work, presentations,
discussions and works critiques seemed to contemplate the idea of learning
as social participation. This also included the dimensions that characterized,
according to Wenger (2008), a community of practice, i.e. mutual engagement,
collaboration and entrepreneurial ideas, routines, actions, vocabulary and
stories that have become part of their practices in the classroom. Under this
view, as Wenger argues (2008: 9), the educational concept that the knowledge
consists of pieces of information that are packaged into learning units designed
and placed in the students brains can be overcome, building alternatives to
education that primarily involves active participation in social communities.
In this sense, learning in a community of music practice can generate trans-
formations in the musical ideas of the group, being these changes sustained by

287
Viviane Beineke

the participation dynamics and engagement built in the classroom. According

to Wenger (2008: 215), ‘The transformative practice of a learning commu-
nity offers an ideal context for developing new understandings because the
community sustains changes as part of an identity of participation’.
The process of creative learning is not linear, because each work produced,
presented and analysed by children can generate its own dynamic in the rela-
tionship between the creativity dimensions. Each of these moments in the
composition activities contributing to the dimensions of creative learning
were articulated in a process that changes and updates in a cyclic spiral move-
ment, i.e., in a repeating cycle that renews, transforms and updates itself in
this process.

concluSionS
Participating in the music classes as composers, performers and critical audi-
ence, children construct their identity in the group, becoming agents of their
own learning, developing knowledge that underpins their ideas of music,
being constantly revised, updated and expanded by their own musical expe-
riences. In the process of learning together, an intersubjective relationship is
established through interaction, exchange, dialogue, socialization and identity
construction.
Over time, these forms of social participation shaped a community bound
by musical practice, engaged and committed to the negotiation process and
significance of these practices, sharing ways to make and think music that
sustain creative activity. In this way, we can see the relationships between the
approach of creative learning and community music principles. As pointed
by L. Higgins (2012: 86), ‘Community music activities do more than focus
on individual expressions of music making; they encourage and empower
participants to become agents for extending and developing music in their
communities’.
In this case study we could observe a work built on direct musical expe-
riences that configures ways to unleash creative learning. Thus, the creative
work goes beyond the objective of creating something new for the students
or the application of acquired musical knowledge. That is because beyond the
products developed in class, the focus is on the collaborative learning proc-
esses and on human beings that relate by making music, which they hear and
learn about together.
In this sense, the cycle between the activities of composing, presenting
and criticizing musical productions – activities understood within a broader
educational process of construction of identity in the context of a commu-
nity of musical practice established in the classroom – can indicate a possible
alternative to traditional learning. This is achieved when there is a desire to
construct musical education in an elementary school that contributes to the
education of more sensitive, critical, transformative and solidarity-oriented
people, opening the possibility to devise a better world.

referenceS
Beineke, V. (2009), ‘Processos intersubjetivos na composição musical de
crianças: um estudo sobre a aprendizagem criativa’/ ‘Intersubjective
processes in children’s music composition: a study about creative learning’,
Unpublished Ph.D., Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do
Sul, http://hdl.handle.net/10183/17775.

288
 Creative learning and communities of practice

Barrett, M. S. (2003), ‘Freedoms and constraints: Constructing musical worlds

through the dialogue of composition’, in M. Hickey (ed.), Why and How
to Teach Music Composition: A new Horizon for Music Education, Reston:
MENC – The National Association for Music Education, pp. 3–27.
Bitencourt, R. L., Pessôa, P. P. and Silva, J. A. S. (2008),‘A metodologia de pesqui-
sa-ação em práticas de composição no ensino de música’, in 17th Encontro
Nacional da ABEM, São Paulo, Brazil, 1–6 October.
Burnard, P. (2006), ‘The individual and social worlds of children’s musical
creativity’, in G. McPherson (ed.), The Child as Musician: A Handbook of
Musical Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 353–74.
Burnard, P. and Younker, B. A. (2004), ‘Problem-solving and creativity:
Insights from students’ individual composing pathways’, International
Journal of Music Education, 22: 1, pp. 59–76.
Craft, A. (2005), Creativity in Schools: Tensions and Dilemmas, London: Routledge.
Craft, A., Cremin, T. and Burnard, P. (2008), Creative Learning 3–11 and How
we Document It, Sterling: Trentham Books.
Feldman, D. H. (2008), ‘Foreword: Documenting creative learning, chan-
ging the world’, in A. Craft, T. Cremin and P. Burnard (eds), Creative
Learning 3–11: And How to Document It, Sterling: Trentham Books Limited,
pp. xiii–xvii.
Higgins, L. (2012), Community Music: In Theory and in Practice, New York, NY:
Oxford University Press.
Jeffrey, B. and Woods, P. (2009), Creative Learning in the Primary School,
London: Routledge.
Martinazzo, C. J. (2005), Pedagogia do entendimento intersubjetivo: razões e pecti-
vas para uma racionalidade comunicativa na Pedagogia/Pedagogy of inter-
subjective understanding: reasons and perspectives for a communicative
rationality in Pedagogy, Ijuí: Unijuí.
Sawyer, K. (2008), ‘Learning music from collaboration’, International Journal of
Educational Research, 47: 1, pp. 50–59.
Swanwick, K. (1994), Musical Knowledge: Intuition, Analysis and Music
Education, London: Routledge.
Wenger, E. (2008), Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity,
New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

SuggeSted citation
Beineke, V. (2013), ‘Creative learning and communities of practice: Perspectives
for music education in the school’, International Journal of Community Music
6: 3, pp. 281–290, doi: 10.1386/ijcm.6.3.281_1

contributor detailS
Viviane Beineke is Professor in the Music Department and the Undergraduate
Music Program of the State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC) in
Florianópolis, Brazil. She has a doctoral degree in Music from the Federal
University at Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS). Viviane Beineke is the author of the
collection Canções do mundo para tocar/Songs of the World to Play, with arrange-
ments for children’s instrumental groups, and also of the children’s book,
CD and CD-ROM Lenga la lenga: jogos de mãos e copos/Lenga la Lenga: Hand
and Cup games, which were released in Brazil, Uruguay and Portugal. She has
published articles in Brazilian music journals; presented papers and work-
shops in Brazilian and international congresses and has conducted workshops

289
Viviane Beineke

in many states of Brazil, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Portugal, Spain and

Uruguay. She conducts research on the construction of pedagogical–musical
knowledge in music teacher education, music education in school, children
musical compositions and creativity in music education.
Contact: State University of Santa Catarina (UDESC), Centro de Artes, Av.
Madre Benvenuta, 1907 Florianópolis CEP 88035-001, Brazil.
E-mail: vivibk@gmail.com

Viviane Beineke has asserted her right under the Copyright, Designs and
Patents Act, 1988, to be identified as the author of this work in the format that
was submitted to Intellect Ltd.

290
Copyright of International Journal of Community Music is the property of Intellect Ltd. and
its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the
copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email
articles for individual use.