Professional Documents
Culture Documents
2
Trends of M&As in India
• LPG revolution (1991) has intensified competition and has forced companies to
consolidate in India.
• A KPMG survey revealed a 270% increase in M&A deals in the first quarter of the
financial year, 2013.
• According to the report of Merger Management consultancy M&A targeting India
totaled US$ 4.9 billion in Q1 2014, 12.7 % over the Q4 2013 value (US$ 4.4
billion).
• A 2015 M&A trend report of Deloitte suggests 12% of multinationals have
reported India to be the preferred destination for their M&A deals.
• India has seen 1,147 deals worth $60.54 billion in the year 2017.
• US $95.4 billion deals in 2018 (Financial Express).
• The increasing volume is witnessed in various sectors like that of finance,
pharmaceuticals, telecom, FMCG, industrial development, automotives and
metals.
Qus 1. What kind of strategic alliances was the MMT-GI
deal?
Kinds of Strategic Alliances
• Joint Ventures
• Mergers
• Acquisitions
• Takeovers
• Demerger, Spin-off /Divestitures
• Outsourcing
• Affiliate Marketing
• Franchising
• Distribution Relationship
5
Strategic Alliances
– Joint ventures
• Indus Towers
• Maruti Suzuki
• TATA-Starbucks
Types of M&A Integration
• Horizontal Integration
• Vertical Integration
Fig. Value Chain of the Manufacturing Industry
Suppliers
R&D Manufacturing Distribution Consumption
/ Vendors
Downward Upward
Integration Integration
• Conglomerate Mergers
Qus 2. What were the reasons for MMT-GI deal?
Drivers of M&As in Organizations
There is a tremendous allure to M&A. It’s the big play, the dramatic gesture. With the
stroke of a pen, you can add billions to size, get a front-page story and create excitement
in the market.” (Michael Porter)
Quest for Bigness/ Gain Market Share
Drivers Globalization
of
Diversification
M&As
Gain Access to New Technologies
Disclosure of Info General Corp Matters Strategic Fit Financial Matters Tax Matters
Reg &Compliances Litigation IPRs, and Insurance Market & Marketing Competition
17
Integration End States
• Marks and Mirvis, 2001; Thach and Nyman, 2001; Schweiger, 2002; Ellis and
Lamont, 2004; Pablo and Javidan, 2009 - Barely 25-35 percent of M&As achieve
their desired goals
• Barney, 1998, Wright et al., 2001 - Less than one quarter of M&As achieve their
financial objectives
• Mitleton and Kelly, 2006; and Weber et.al, 2010 - Despite the strategic gains of
M&A like, synergy realization, increase in market share, business unit integration,
market extension, product extension; or financial gains like increase in profit their
success is not assured.
Post‐ M&A Integration During
Mergers and Acquisitions
22
A Successful Integration is a COMPLEX Process
(Bansal, 2019)
Antecedents of Justice Moderators Process Outcomes
Perceptions
HUMAN INTEGRATION
HR Integration
End-to-End Talent Management
Relational Convergence
CLIMATE OF
COMFORT
SYNERGY REALIZATION
CULTURAL Operational Synergy
INTEGRATION Financial Synergy
Cultural Fit PERCEPTION OF JUSTICE
Cultural Convergence Allocation of Resources
Managing Divergence Fair Execution of Processes
Candid and Transparent
Communication
EMPLOYEE
PSYCHOLOGICAL
TASK INTEGRATION OUTCOMES
Structure to Work TOP MANAGEMENT Employee Satisfaction
Inter-organizational Task Teams SUPPORT TO CHANGE Employee Commitment
Capability Transfer
Standardization of Processes
Manpower Optimization
24
Qus . How should Srivastava prioritize and standardize
the integration of different HRM processes across
merging disparate entities?
HR Integration