Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Creative Industries
Visit to download the full and correct content document:
https://ebooksecure.com/download/ebook-pdf-the-oxford-handbook-of-creative-indust
ries/
22. Digitizing Fads and Fashions: Disintermediation and Glocalized Markets in
Creative Industries
PAUL M. HIRSCH AND DANIEL A. GRUBER
Author Index
Subject Index
LIST OF FIGURES
Hasan Bakhshi Director, Creative Economy Policy and Research, Nesta, and
Adjunct Professor, Queensland University of Technology
INTRODUCTION
CHAPTER 1
CREATIVE INDUSTRIES
A Typology of Change
INTRODUCTION
EVEN if there are elements of creativity in most human endeavour, not all industries
are organized principally to take advantage of and capture the market value of
human creativity. Creativity is a process of generating something new by combining
elements that already exist (Boden, 1990; Romer, 1990; Runco and Pritzker, 1999;
Sternberg, 1999) and hinges upon individuals’ and organizations’ capability and
willingness to engage in non-routine, experimental, and often uncertain activities.
Creativity is enacted in the individual (Kaufman and Sternberg, 2015), within teams
(Gilson, 2015), and within networks (Cattani, Ferriani, and Colucci, 2015). Such
individuals, teams, and networks, as well as the business firms that profit from them,
are typically attracted to those geographic locations that offer the best milieus for
them to coexist and interact, and as a result, particular cities tend to be more
characterized by human creativity than others (Lorenzen and Andersen, 2009;
Florida, Mellander, and Adler, 2015). Thus, creative industries engage not only
individuals, firms, and cities, but also national and international governmental
policies to support and protect national cultures and economic sectors (Bakhshi,
Cunningham, and Mateos-Garcia, 2015).
To craft and capture value, creative entrepreneurs and organizations may
generate new business models (Svejenova, Slavich, and AbdelGawad, 2015) and
also translate various forms of capitals such as symbolic and economic (Townley
and Gulledge, 2015). They also organize creative products, performances, and
services around projects, and develop roles and routines that enable them to
successfully complete their products and enhance learning (DeFillippi, 2015),
particularly since creative industries are permeated by paradoxes and managerial
challenges that can undermine value creation and value capture (DeFillippi,
Grabher, and Jones, 2007). The desire to capture value from creative individuals
and products generates dynamics of stardom for individuals (Currid-Halkett, 2015),
labour market inequalities for most talent (Menger, 2015), sunk costs for firms
(Bakker, 2015), and laws and international agreements such as those surrounding
copyright (Kretschmer, 2015; Macmillan, 2015). There is a significant effort
expended on defining and measuring performance in creative industries, including
artistic, commercial, managerial, and social (Hadida, 2015).
The creation and pursuit of value alters cultural landscapes and generates
economic development. Creative industries transform cultural landscapes when
creatives play with semiotic codes—the structure and relations among symbolic
elements—to infuse new ideas and meanings into creative products (Barthes, 1977,
1990). For example, bebop jazz in the 1940s, miniskirts in the 1960s, or the waves
of Modernist architecture throughout the twentieth century not only changed how
creative artefacts were produced and consumed but also, importantly, cultural
meaning. Jazz was no longer only music to dance to, but was to be listened to and
taken seriously, miniskirts symbolized the new freedoms of the sixties, while
Modernist buildings celebrated technical scale and challenged implicitly the
primacy of the Church. These symbolic values were recognized and converted to
economic values. As engines of economic development, creative industries have
remarkable growth in terms of product offerings and turnover, and new business
models (see, e.g., DCMS, 2007, 2014; European Commission, 2001; HM Treasury,
2005; OECD, 2006; UNESCO, 2006), which vary dramatically depending on
national context (Christopherson, 2004, 2008; Hesmondhalgh and Pratt, 2005; Ye,
2008; Economist, 2013a). Although definitions differ, it is clear that the economics
of creative industries generate spillover effects across the wider economy
(Cunningham and Potts, 2015). The combination of changes in semiotic code and
material usage reflect and drive cultural change and economic value, encompassing
both the tangible and the intangible. Thus, creative industries are cultures of
development, playing a significant role in how both the social and economic life of
nation states develop and change (Pratt, 2015).
It is evident that while some degree of change is inherent to all creative industries,
they change at different paces, ranging from minor ripples to a ‘gale of creative
destruction’ (Schumpeter, 1942). Understanding the nature of change of creative
industries is central to understanding (and propagating) their potential for
development and transformation. In the following, we provide a framework for
such understanding. In order to do so, we first define creative industries by focusing
on creative products (Hirsch, 2000). By ‘products’ we mean the artefacts and
offerings of creative industries including physical items, performances, services,
and deliverables to clients (we use the term ‘product’ to denote all these). We
identify two key dimensions of creative products that may undergo change: semiotic
codes and the material base. Next, we identify four primary drivers of change:
demand, public policy, technology, and globalization. Finally, we identify four
primary types of change in the creative industries—Preserve, Ideate, Transform, and
Recreate—as particular combinations of change in semiotic codes and the material
base. Throughout the chapter, we provide examples of how particular creative
products and industries are characterized by these different change types, and how
this has differential effects on business models, industry organization, and
ultimately cultural transformation and economic growth.
Diffuse Sclerosis.
The various forms of sclerosis thus far considered were at one time
considered as varieties of chronic myelitis, and under different
names, founded on leading symptoms, were considered to be
merely local, and perhaps accidental, variations of one and the same
morbid process. More accurate clinical and pathological analysis has
separated from the general family of the scleroses one clearly
demarcated form after another. Tabes dorsalis, disseminated
sclerosis, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and the combined forms of
sclerosis have been successively isolated. Still, a large number of
cases are left which cannot be classified either with the regular
affections of the cord, limited to special systems of fibres, or with the
disseminated form last considered. They agree with the latter in that
they are not uniform; they differ from it in that they are not
multilocular. Not a few modern authors have neglected making any
provisions for these cases, while others treat of them in conjunction
with acute myelitis, of which disease it is sometimes regarded as a
sequel. The term diffuse sclerosis is here applied to those forms of
chronic myelitis which follow no special rule in their location, and to
such as are atypical and do not correspond in their symptomatology
or anatomy to the more regular forms of sclerosis. In regional
distribution the foci of diffuse sclerosis imitate those of acute myelitis:
they may be transverse, fascicular, or irregular.
FIG. 33.
The so-called myelitis without softening, or hyperplastic myelitis of
Dujardin-Beaumetz, which is ranked by Leyden and Erb among the
acute processes, properly belongs here. It is characterized by a
proliferation of the interstitial substance, both of its cellular and
fibrillar elements. The nerve-elements proper play no part, or at best
a very slight or secondary one. In the sense that this affection occurs
after acute diseases and develops in a brief period it may be called
an acute myelitis, but both in its histological products and its clinical
features it approximates the sclerotic or chronic inflammatory
affections of the cord. As far as the clinical features are concerned,
this is particularly well shown in the disseminated myelitis found by
Westphal after acute diseases, such as the exanthematous and
continued fevers.
If, while the leg is slightly flexed on the thigh, the foot be extended,149
so as to render the Achilles tendon and the muscles connected with
it tense, and the hand while grasping the foot suddenly presses the
latter to still further extension, a quick contraction occurs, which, if
the pressure be renewed and kept up, recurs again and again, the
succession of the involuntary movements resembling a clonic
spasm. This action is termed the ankle-clonus or foot-phenomenon.
Gowers has amplified this test of exaggerated reflex excitability by
adding what he calls the front-tap contraction. The foot being held in
the same way as stated above, the examiner strikes the muscles on
the front of the leg; the calf-muscles contract and cause a brief
extension movement of the foot. It is believed that the foot-clonus
and the front-tap contraction are always pathological, but a few
observers, notably Gnauck, leave it an open question whether it may
not occur in neurotic subjects who have no organic disease. Gowers
considers the foot-clonus found in hysterical women as spurious,
and states that it differs from the true form in that it is not constant,
being broken by voluntary contractions, and does not begin as soon
as the observer applies pressure. But I have seen the form of clonus
which Gowers regards as hysterical in cases of diffuse sclerosis.
With regard to the front-tap contraction, its discoverer150 admits that
it may be obtained in persons in whom there is no reason to suspect
organic disease. It is significant only when unequal on the two sides.
149 By extension the approximation of the dorsal surface to the tibial aspect of the leg
—what some German writers call dorsal flexion—is meant.
150 Gowers, The Diagnosis of the Diseases of the Spinal Cord, 3d ed., p. 33.
The drift of opinion to-day is to regard pain in the spinal region as not
pathognomonic of organic spinal affections. It is true that pain is a
frequent concomitant of neuroses, and that it is more intense and
characteristic in vertebral and meningeal disease; but in denying a
significance to pain in the back as an evidence of diffuse disease of
the cord itself, I think many modern observers have gone to an
extreme. It is particularly in diffuse sclerosis that a dull heavy
sensation is experienced in the lumbo-sacral region; and in a
number of my cases of slowly ascending myelitis and of tabes
dorsalis the involvement of the arms was accompanied by an
extension of the same pain, in one case associated with intolerable
itching, to the interscapular region. It cannot be maintained that the
pain corresponds in situation to the sclerotic area. It is probably, like
the pain in the extremities, a symptom of irradiation, and
corresponds in distribution to that of the spinal rami of the nerves
arising in the affected level.
As the posterior columns are usually involved in transverse myelitis,
the same lancinating and terebrating pains may occur as in tabes
dorsalis. As a rule, they are not as severe, and a dull, heavy feeling,
comparable to a tired or a burning sensation, is more common. A
belt sensation, like that of tabes, and as in tabes corresponding to
the altitude of the lesion, is a much more constant symptom than
acute pains.
The main difference between the diffuse sclerosis and acute myelitis,
clinically considered, consists in the gradual development of
symptoms in the former as contrasted with their rapid development
in the latter disease. Acute myelitis is established within a few hours,
days, or at most, in the subacute forms, a few weeks; chronic
myelitis requires months and years to become a clearly-manifested
disorder. It is the essential correspondence of the symptoms of both
conditions, intrinsically considered, which renders it impossible to
distinguish clinically and in the absence of a history of the case
between some cases of acute myelitis in the secondary period and
the processes which are primarily of a sclerotic character.
There is one point in which spinal and cerebral disease involving the
motor tract differs in the majority of cases, which may be utilized in
distinguishing obscure affections of the former from those of the
latter kind. In cerebral paralysis of any standing the superficial
reflexes, such as the cremaster and abdominal reflexes, are usually
diminished or abolished, while the deep or tendon reflexes are
exaggerated. In spastic conditions due to spinal disease—say
sclerosis of any kind affecting the lateral column and leaving the
motor nuclei of the anterior cornua unaffected—the deep reflexes
are similarly increased, but the cremaster reflex is increased also.154
This feature of the superficial reflexes is significant in the case of
cerebral disease only when unilateral.
154 Attention has been called, I believe, by Westphal, to the fact that the cremaster
reflex may not be demonstrable when reflex excitability is at its highest, because the
cremaster muscle is already in extreme spastic contraction.
FIG. 34.
Secondary Degeneration of Interolivary Layer: D Ds D, degenerated
area; r, the distorted raphé.