1.

Introduction:
 Background: Briefly introduce the broader field and context of your research. Highlight the
existing knowledge base and identify any gaps or unanswered questions.
 Research Question(s): Clearly state the specific question(s) you aim to answer or hypothesis you
want to test. These should be well-defined, focused, and relevant to your field.
 Significance: Explain the importance of your research. Why is it worth investigating? What
potential impact might your findings have on the field or society?
2. Literature Review:
 Critical Synthesis: Summarize and analyze relevant existing research related to your
topic. Discuss how your work builds upon or departs from prior studies.
 Theoretical Framework: Identify and define key theories or concepts that inform your research
question and methodology.
 Gaps and Justification: Clearly identify the gap in knowledge your research aims to address and
justify the need for further investigation.
3. Methodology:
 Research Design: Specify the type of research you will conduct
(e.g., quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods) and explain the rationale behind your choice.
 Data Collection: Describe the methods you will use to gather data
(e.g., surveys, interviews, experiments, observations). Include details about sample
size, participant recruitment, and data collection instruments.
 Data Analysis: Explain the methods you will use to analyze your data. Provide information about
statistical tests, software, or qualitative coding techniques.
4. Findings and Results:
 Present your findings in a clear and organized manner. This may involve figures, tables, or
quotes depending on your research methods.
 Analyze and interpret your results: Explain what your findings mean in the context of your
research question and existing knowledge.
 Highlight any unexpected or interesting findings: Discuss their potential implications and
limitations.
5. Discussion:
 Relate your findings to the existing literature and your initial research question. Explain how
your research contributes to the field and address any limitations.
 Discuss the broader implications of your findings: What are the potential applications or real-
world impacts of your research?
 Identify future research directions: Suggest areas for further investigation based on your findings
and limitations.
6. Conclusion:
 Summarize your key findings and their significance.
 Restate the broader contribution of your research to the field.
 Provide a final note for reflection: Leave the reader with something to think about or a clear
understanding of your project's lasting value.
 Case study

Court and Case Details:

 Court Name and Level: Identify the specific court that issued the ruling (e.g., Supreme
Court, appeals court, trial court).
 Case Name and Citation: Include the official case name and citation for referencing purposes.
 Date of Decision: Mention the date the court issued the judgment.

2. Factual Background:

 Briefly summarize the factual context of the case, including the nature of the dispute and the
actions of the parties involved.
 Identify the legal issues raised in the case.
 Arguments

3. Majority Opinion:

 Analyze the reasoning of the majority judges in reaching their decision.

 Focus on the legal principles applied and how the court interpreted relevant
statutes, precedents, and other legal sources.
 Identify the ratio decidendi, the core legal principle upon which the court's decision rests.

4. Dissenting Opinions (if applicable):

 If present, summarize the reasoning of any dissenting judges and their disagreement with the
majority's decision.
 Highlight any alternative legal interpretations or arguments proposed by the dissent.

5. Impact of the Decision:

 Discuss the legal precedent set by the case and its potential impact on future rulings in similar
cases.
 Consider the broader societal or policy implications of the court's decision.

6. Critical Analysis:

 Go beyond simply summarizing the case and engage in critical analysis.

 Evaluate the strength of the court's reasoning and identify any potential weaknesses or
inconsistencies.
 Compare the case to other relevant decisions and consider how it fits within the broader body of
case law.
 Consider the role of external factors such as social context or political pressure in influencing the
court's decision.