A BIOMECHANICAL COMPARISON BETWEEN SQUATBAR AND OLYMPIC

BARBELL

Falch et al. (2023) compared the biomechanics of the Squatbar and Olympic Barbell. The
researchers examined the kinematics, kinetics, and myoelectric activity (EMG) of two barbells
during a one-rep maximum (1-RM) back squat.
In this investigation, the authors recruited 12 male athletes who were 27.3 ± 3.8 years
old, weighed 83.5 ± 7.8 kg, stood 180.3 ± 6.7 cm tall, and had at least two years of strength
training experience. The participants did a 1-RM back squat using both the Squatbar and the
Olympic Barbell. A 3D motion capture system, force plates, and surface EMG electrodes were
used to record and analyze the kinematics, kinetics, and EMG.
According to the findings of the study, the Squatbar is a good substitute for the Olympic
barbell for athletes who have limited shoulder mobility when executing the squat. When
compared to the Olympic barbell, the Squatbar elicits similar kinetics, kinematics, and EMG,
with the exception of reducing external rotation of the shoulder. The study concluded that the
Squatbar is less stressful on the shoulders than the regular Olympic barbell.
Falch et al.'s (2023) research provides vital insights into the biomechanics of the Squatbar
and Olympic Barbell. The Squatbar is a type of barbell that is specifically intended for squats. It
differs from the standard Olympic barbell in that it has a distinct form that provides for a more
comfortable and steady grasp during squats. The cambered form of the Squatbar helps to relieve
stress on the wrists and shoulders, which is especially good for those who have mobility
concerns or injuries. The International Powerlifting Federation (IPF) discovered that the
Squatbar reduced shoulder external rotation while increasing weight lifted when compared to the
regular Olympic barbell in this study. Overall, the outcomes of the study indicate that the
Squatbar is a viable alternative to the classic Olympic barbell for those seeking a more
comfortable and stable grip during squats, as well as those with mobility concerns or injuries.
The methodology of the investigation was robust, and the findings were statistically significant.
The study, however, had a limited sample size and all of the subjects were male. As a result,
further research is needed to investigate the biomechanics of the Squatbar in a broader and more
diverse population. Also, it is crucial to note, however, that the Squatbar is a specific barbell and
may not be appropriate for all sorts of workouts.

REFERENCE:
Falch, H. N., Kristiansen, E., & van den Tillaar, R. (2023). A biomechanical comparison
between squatbar® and Olympic Barbell. Biomechanics, 3(2), 258–266.
https://doi.org/10.3390/biomechanics3020022