Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CLOUD 9 Ltd.
An Audit Case Study
Updated Canadian Edition
Fiona CAMPBELL
Ernst & Young, Melbourne, Australia
Amanda WHITE
School of Accounting
University of Technology, Sydney, Australia
Valerie WARREN
Kwantlen Polytechnic University, Surrey, British Columbia
and
Brandy DUDAS
Douglas College, New Westminster, British Columbia
CFFIRS 09/29/2015 16:32:9 Page 2
All rights reserved. No part of this work covered by the copyrights herein may be reproduced,
transmitted, or used in any form or by any means—graphic, electronic, or mechanical—without the
prior written permission of the publisher.
Any request for photocopying, recording, taping, or inclusion in information storage and retrieval
systems of any part of this book shall be directed to the Canadian copyright licensing agency, Access
Copyright. For an Access Copyright licence, visit www.accesscopyright.ca or call toll-free, 1-800-893-
5777.
Care has been taken to trace ownership of copyright material contained in this text. The publishers will
gladly receive any information that will enable them to rectify any erroneous reference or credit line in
subsequent editions.
Production Credits
Executive Editor: Zoë Craig
Vice President and Publisher: Veronica Visentin
Director of Marketing: Joan Lewis-Milne
Marketing Manager: Anita Osborne
Editorial Manager: Karen Staudinger
Developmental Editor: Daleara Jamasji Hirjikaka
Production and Media Specialist: Meaghan MacDonald
Cover and Interior Design: Tegan Wallace
Media Editor: Luisa Begani
Cover Photograph: istock/Gorfer
Typesetting: Thomson Digital
CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Cloud 9 Ltd. company background . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .1
Personnel . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Financial information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Required . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
ASSIGNMENTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
Assignment 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5
Understand the business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Assignment 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .8
Calculate materiality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
Assignment 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Assertions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Assignment 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Documenting an accounting process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Assignment 5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Identifying errors in the accounting process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Assignment 6 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Identifying controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Assignment 7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Testing controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
Assignment 8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Determining the overall risk assessment and developing the substantive audit
program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
Assignment 9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Audit sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Assignment 10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Substantive testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
Assignment 11 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Subsequent events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
Assignment 12 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
Assessing going concern and audit opinions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43
Appendix 1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Statement of Income . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Statement of Financial Position . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 44
Appendix 2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Trial balance (December 31, 2014) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45
Draft Statement of Income (December 31, 2014) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Appendix 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47
Contents iii
CTOC 09/29/2015 16:36:27 Page 4
iv Contents
CINTRO 09/29/2015 16:34:21 Page 1
INTRODUCTION
This case study is designed to provide students with the opportunity to work through various
audit procedures that are performed during the planning and interim phases of a financial
statement audit. Typical client scenarios that are regularly observed in the profession are the
basis for this case study, and the aim is to expose students to the tasks they would typically
perform in their first year of auditing practice.
In this case study, students play the role of a graduate working for W&S Partners, a
Canadian accounting firm with offices located in each of the major Canadian cities. W&S
Partners has just been awarded the December 31, 2015, statutory audit work for Cloud 9 Ltd.
The audit team assigned to the client is: Partner, J.M. Wadley; Audit Manager, Sharon
Gallagher; Audit Senior, Josh Thomas; and IT Audit Manager, Mark Batten.
Prior year audits were conducted by Ellis & Associates. As part of the change of auditors
process, J.M. Wadley met with R.J. Ellis (Managing Partner, Ellis & Associates) to discuss the
acceptance of Cloud 9 Ltd. as a client and to inquire about access to Ellis & Associates’ working
papers. In the discussion, R.J. Ellis stated that there were no issues that W&S Partners should be
aware of before accepting the client or commencing the work.
Introduction 1
CINTRO 09/29/2015 16:34:21 Page 2
and media coverage have been very successful and sales of the Heavenly 456 walking shoe
have steadily increased. For Cloud 9 Ltd., the Heavenly 456 now makes up 25 percent of total
sales. The Lightning 7 shoe was marketed in the basketball stadium during Thompson Thunders
games as well as heavily advertised using Bodhi Parker’s image. Due to a poor first season, sales
of the Lightning 7 were unimpressive and, as a result, Cloud 9 still has a large amount of
inventory in its warehouse.
To further establish the brand, the first Cloud 9 retail store was opened in Toronto, Ontario,
on June 1, 2015. The store operates on a just-in-time inventory system linked with the main
warehouse in Richmond, B.C. However, the management team reports that there have been a
few hiccups in determining ideal inventory quantities for the store to allow optimum availability
of merchandise to the customers. There have also been some thefts of merchandise from the
store and, in order to reduce inventory loss by theft, the company has installed closed-circuit
television cameras.
Personnel
Cloud 9 Ltd. has 52 full-time employees. In the retail store, the company employs part-time
staff, with casual employees enhancing staffing levels in the busier retail period.
To administer the company’s finances, Cloud 9 Ltd. employs Finance Director, David
Collier; Financial Controller, Carla Johnson; and Business Systems Manager, Justin Reeves.
These three employees are entitled to participate in the employee stock option plan and receive
stock options in Cloud 9 Inc. if revenue targets are met.
Financial information
Responding to pressure from its parent company, Cloud 9 Ltd. set a goal to increase its revenue
by 4 percent for the 2015 fiscal year. One of the critical success factors for the company to
achieve this 4-percent increase is to grow its share of the North American footwear market.
However, with the new store opening and the subsequent increase in costs, as well as the costs
related to the sponsorship deals, the management team is projecting a loss for the year.
In addition, to build customer loyalty and promote sales in the retail store, Cloud 9 Ltd.
introduced a loyalty program whereby customers earn one point for every $10 that they spend.
Customers can then redeem points on-line to receive coupons that can be exchanged for
merchandise in the store.
On October 1, 2014, the company took out an additional loan of $3 million with Ontario
Bank to help fund the store costs, and to purchase additional delivery trucks and vans. This loan
is repayable over five years. The company’s other debt relates to loans from one of Ron
McLellan’s other companies, which were issued between 1980 and 1993 when the original
company was a sole proprietorship. R.A. McLellan extended the repayment date as part of the
consideration for the sale.
All inventory is purchased in U.S. dollars. The company provides a 12-month warranty on
all footwear. Historical claims have been 2 percent of total sales.
Refer to Appendix 1 for the prior year’s statement of income and statement of financial position.
Required
In the following section, there are 12 assignments that are designed to be completed as concepts
are introduced throughout the auditing course.
ASSIGNMENTS
Assignment 1
Understand the business . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
In this first assignment, students research the footwear retail and wholesale industries to identify
potential audit risks.
Assignment 2
Calculate materiality . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
In this assignment, students calculate planning materiality and performance materiality.
Assignment 3
Assertions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
This assignment sees students identify the related account assertions to the risks identified in
assignment 1.
Assignment 4
Documenting an accounting process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Students will prepare a flowchart of an accounting process based on a transcript from a client
interview. After documenting the transaction flow, students should list additional questions they
would want to ask the client to complete their understanding of the process.
Assignment 5
Identifying errors in the accounting process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
For this assignment, students will need to review the accounting transaction flow from assignment 4 in
order to determine where errors could occur. They also will identify the assertion affected by the
potential error.
Assignment 6
Identifying controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19
Using and adding to the work sheet from assignment 5, students will now identify controls the client
has in place to stop errors occurring as well as the assertions covered by those controls.
Assignment 7
Testing controls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
For this assignment, students will complete the tests of controls for the cash receipts process.
Assignment 8
Determining the overall risk assessment and developing the substantive
audit program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
In this assignment, students will link all their previous findings in order to determine the overall risk
assessment for specific account assertions. Based on the overall risk assessment, students will develop
the substantive audit program for selected accounts.
Assignment 9
Audit sampling . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
This assignment requires students to identify the appropriate sampling method to use in different
circumstances.
Assignments 3
CASSIGNMENT 09/29/2015 16:28:31 Page 4
Assignment 10
Substantive testing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33
For this assignment, students will be required to apply their knowledge of substantive testing to
accounts payable.
Assignment 11
Subsequent events . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
In this assignment, students will apply the requirements of CAS 560 Subsequent Events to a number
of different scenarios that could arise during the audit.
Assignment 12
Assessing going concern and audit opinions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 41
In this assignment, the student will assess the ability of Cloud 9 to continue as a going concern and
then be required to determine the audit opinion based upon a variety of circumstances.
ASSIGNMENT 1
Required
Josh Thomas, Audit Senior, has asked you to research the retail and wholesale footwear
industries and report back to the audit team. Your report will form part of the overall
understanding of Cloud 9 Ltd.’s structure and its environment.
You should concentrate your research on providing findings from those areas that have a
financial statement impact and are considered probable given Cloud 9 Ltd.’s operations. In
conducting your research, you should consider the following key market forces, as they relate
to Cloud 9 Ltd.’s operations.
For each area listed below, consider whether that factor could increase the risk of material
misstatement in Cloud 9’s financial statements.
List your potential risks in the table provided.
Competitive environment
What products does the client sell, and have there been significant changes with respect to:
– major products or brands?
– selling strategies?
– sales/gross margin by product?
Who are the client’s major competitors, and what share of the market does each hold?
Assignment 1 5
CASSGN1 09/29/2015 15:49:42 Page 6
Product information
Is there a specific life cycle for the product?
Is the product dependent on trends or styles?
Customer information
Are there specific customers on whom the client is highly dependent?
What is the overall profile of the client’s customers? Have there been significant
fluctuations in the client’s customer base?
Supplier information
Who are the key suppliers?
Are the materials subject to significant price movements or influenced by external market
forces?
List your potential significant risks in the following table. Also name the account that would
potentially be misstated. Leave the “Assertion(s)” and the “Level of inherent risk” columns
blank until you complete assignment 3.
Cloud 9 Ltd.
December 31, 2015
Identification of significant risks
Potential risk— Assertion(s) Level of inherent risk
Account(s)
description (assignment 3) (assignment 3)
Discuss your responses with your supervisor (or teacher). Can you clearly distinguish between
a risk faced by the business and a significant risk?
Assignment 1 7
CASSGN2 10/29/2015 14:8:30 Page 8
ASSIGNMENT 2
Calculate materiality
Learning objective
One of the underlying principles in auditing is the concept of materiality. An auditor designs
procedures in order to identify and correct errors or irregularities that would have a material
impact on the financial statements. Such errors or irregularities are considered material if they
would impact the decision-making of the users of the financial statements. Materiality is used
in determining audit procedures, selecting samples, and evaluating differences from client
records to audit results. It is the maximum amount of misstatement, individually or in
aggregate, that can be accepted in the financial statements.
In selecting the base figure to be used to calculate materiality, an auditor should consider
the key driver of the business. They should ask themselves, “What are the end users (such as
shareholders and banks) of the financial statements going to be looking at?” For example, will
shareholders be interested in the net income that can be used to pay dividends and increase
share price?
Planning materiality
W&S Partners’ audit methodology dictates that one planning materiality (PM) amount is to be
used for the financial statements as a whole. Further, only one basis should be selected—a
blended approach or average should not be used. The basis selected is the one determined to be
the key driver of the business.
W&S Partners uses the following percentages as starting points for the various bases.
These starting points can be increased or decreased by taking into account qualitative client
factors, which could be:
the nature of the client’s business and industry (such as rapid change, either through growth
or downsizing, or unstable environment)
the fact that it is a publicly listed entity (or subsidiary of) subject to regulations
the knowledge of or high risk of fraud.
Revenues 0.5
Equity 1.0
Typically, profit before tax is used; however, it cannot be used if the entity is reporting a
loss for the year or if profitability is not consistent.
When calculating PM based on interim figures, it may be necessary to annualize the results.
This allows the auditor to properly plan the audit based on an approximate projected year-end
balance. Then, at year end, the figure is adjusted, if necessary, to reflect the actual results.
Note: Adjustments to the starting points are made by an experienced auditor using their
professional judgement. The aim is to set PM at a level that appropriately balances the
amount of testing, while still keeping the audit risk to an acceptable level.
Performance materiality
W&S Partners also dictates that performance materiality be determined for each audit
engagement. Performance materiality is an amount less than planning materiality that reduces
the likelihood that any uncorrected and undetected misstatements within a class of
transactions, account balances, or disclosures in aggregate exceed overall planning materiality.
W&S Partners’ policy is to use 70 percent of planning materiality to determine performance
materiality.
Required
Using the working paper provided (A2–1):
Select the basis for planning materiality that you believe is most appropriate. Justify your
selection.
Calculate the PM using the December 31, 2015, trial balance and draft Statement of Income
in Appendix 2.
Based on your determination of PM, calculate and conclude on performance materiality.
Assignment 2 9
CASSGN2 10/29/2015 14:8:30 Page 10
Cloud 9 Ltd.
December 31, 2015
Setting materiality
Users Financial statement area of most concern to the user
Calculation of PM
Current Year Prior Year
Trial balance amount: _______________________ _______________________
Normalizing adjustments
(that is, non-recurring items) _______________________ _______________________
Annualized (if required): _______________________ _______________________
Benchmark applied _______________________ _______________________
Calculated materiality: _______________________ _______________________
Discussion points
Consider how you will use the planning materiality in your audit. What factors might lead you
to increase or decrease the planning materiality amount? Are there qualitative factors that
could impact your materiality decision?
ASSIGNMENT 3
Assertions
Learning objective
In this assignment, you will extend your knowledge gained in assignment 1 by taking the
significant risks you have already identified and then conducting further analysis on their
likelihood and materiality.
Risks identified from gaining an understanding of the client’s business are referred to as
inherent risks. These risks are considered in the audit-risk formula. The auditor needs to
identify which financial statement assertions may be affected by these inherent risks.
Identifying these risks will help determine the nature of the audit procedures to be performed.
Management implicitly or explicitly makes assertions regarding the recognition,
measurement, and presentation of the various elements of the financial statements and related
disclosures. Auditors use assertions for account balances to form a basis for the assessment of
risks of material misstatement. That is, assertions are used to identify the types of errors that
could occur in transactions that result in the account balances. Consequently, breaking down
the financial statement accounts into these assertions will direct the audit effort to those areas
of higher risk.
Assertions direct the audit, and audit procedures are designed so that they are responsive to
the assessed risks. Broadly, these assertions can be classified in the following categories:
existence or occurrence
completeness
valuation and allocation, or accuracy
rights and obligations
cut-off
classification
presentation, disclosure, and understandability
Required
Using the risks identified in assignment 1 on working paper A1–1, complete the following
information in the relevant columns of the working paper.
Identify the associated financial account (if you haven’t done so already) and assertions that
would be affected.
Give an assessment of “high,” “medium,” or “low” in relation to the likelihood and
materiality of the risk occurring.
A risk should be classified as “high” if it is highly likely to be present and material. A risk
should be classified as “medium” if it may be present and material. Risks should be classified
as “low” if they are unlikely to be present and/or not material.
Discussion points
Did you have any significant risks that could not be linked to an account in the financial
statements and an assertion? Is it still a significant risk?
Given your analysis—for this client—is the overall level of inherent risk “low,” “medium,”
or “high”?
Assignment 3 11
CASSGN4 09/29/2015 16:9:11 Page 12
ASSIGNMENT 4
Required
Audit Manager Sharon Gallagher and Audit Senior Josh Thomas previously met with the
Cloud 9 Ltd. Finance Director, David Collier, to gain an understanding of the internal controls
at the entity level. Based on their interview, they have assessed those controls as being
effective. Therefore, at a high level, the company demonstrates an environment where
potential misstatements are prevented or detected.
You have been assigned the task of documenting the understanding of the process
for recording sales, accounts receivable, and cash receipts for wholesale customers.
In your absence, Josh met with the Cloud 9 Ltd. Financial Controller, Carla Johnson,
and received permission to tape the interview, which is provided as a transcript (see
Appendix 3).
Note: The follow-up questions could be addressed to Carla Johnson or any other employee you
deem appropriate.
Assignment 4 13
CASSGN4 09/29/2015 16:9:11 Page 14
Cloud 9 Ltd.
December 31, 2015
Sales and cash receipts process—documenting understanding of internal controls
Purpose: To document the sales to cash receipts process for wholesale sales
Cloud 9 Ltd.
December 31, 2015
Sales and cash receipts process—documenting understanding of internal controls
Assignment 4 15
CASSGN4 09/29/2015 16:9:12 Page 16
In the table below, list any parts of the sales and cash receipts process that is unclear from the
interview or where you believe a weakness may be present. Also describe the potential
misstatements that may occur as a result of the weakness.
Cloud 9 Ltd.
December 31, 2015
Sales and cash receipts process—documenting internal control weaknesses
Follow-up point/Control weakness Potential misstatement
Discussion points
Begin to consider whether any of the control weaknesses identified might be mitigated by
another control within Cloud 9’s business processes. What would you do if you found a
weakness that did have a mitigating control? Would it affect your assessment of the control
system’s ability to prevent or detect material misstatements?
ASSIGNMENT 5
Required
Based on your knowledge of the wholesale sales to cash receipts process from assignment 4
working papers A4–1 and A4–2:
identify the potential misstatements that could occur in each part of the sales and cash
receipts process; for example, receiving orders, obtaining inventory, and processing
payments.
for those misstatements, identify the financial statement assertions that are affected.
Document your findings in the first three columns of working paper A5–1. You will
complete the fourth column of the working paper in assignment 6.
Assignment 5 17
CASSGN5 09/29/2015 16:16:31 Page 18
ASSIGNMENT 6
Identifying controls
Learning objective
To mitigate the risk of misstatement, companies should establish a strong control environment
or tone at the top. Internal controls at the transaction level should be designed to prevent or
detect the material misstatements that could occur within the flow of transactions. Auditors are
required to obtain an understanding of these risks and controls.
Required
Use the working paper from assignment 5 (A5–1) to complete this assignment. In column four,
include the transaction-level internal controls that Cloud 9 Ltd. has implemented to prevent
and/or detect potential errors (based on the understanding of internal controls you gained in
assignment 4).
Assignment 6 19
Another random document with
no related content on Scribd:
The Project Gutenberg eBook of The coat without
a seam, and other poems
This ebook is for the use of anyone anywhere in the United
States and most other parts of the world at no cost and with
almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away
or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License
included with this ebook or online at www.gutenberg.org. If you
are not located in the United States, you will have to check the
laws of the country where you are located before using this
eBook.
Language: English
A volume of miscellaneous
poems containing as its title poem
a reply to the German “Hymn of
Hate.”
“Firmly and finely fashioned,
and unaffectedly sincere.”—The
New York Times.
“Miss Cone’s verse shows a
delicacy of imagination which is
deserving of high praise.”—The
Outlook.
$1.50 net
NEW YORK
E. P.
DUTTON &
COMPANY
681 Fifth
Avenue
THE
COAT WITHOUT A SEAM
And Other Poems
BY
HELEN GRAY CONE
Author of “A Chant of Love for England,
and Other Poems”
NEW YORK
E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY
681 Fifth Avenue
Copyright 1919, by
E. P. DUTTON & COMPANY
II
III
IV