University of Bahrain

Business collage – Management and Marketing Department

First semester – 2023/2024

Prof.Adel Al-Alawi

KHNOLEDGE MANAGEMENT – MGT446

Final Project

Created by sara ahmad almajthoub

ID:20185647
Serial number:
Section 1
Table of contents

Abstract...............................................................................................................................................................................................3
I. Introduction....................................................................................................................................................................................4
II. Materials/Methods:.......................................................................................................................................................................8
1.1 A critical review of knowledge management.............................................................................................................................8
1.2 Introduction to knowledge management and AI....................................................................................................................13
1.3 Opportunities of AI in knowledge management.....................................................................................................................15
1.4 AI support for Fundamental Dimensions of KM....................................................................................................................18
1.5 Collaborative partnership between Human and AI in knowledge management.................................................................19
Gap:...................................................................................................................................................................................................20
Findings.............................................................................................................................................................................................35
Conclusion........................................................................................................................................................................................36
Recommendation and future Research..........................................................................................................................................37
Bibliography.....................................................................................................................................................................................39
 The Role of Knowledge Management
In Artificial intelligence
(Humans and AI in KM)

Abstract
This research explores the collaborative partnership between humans and artificial intelligence (AI) in knowledge management (KM). The study
begins with critical review of knowledge management then it introduces the importance of knowledge management in organizations and the potential
opportunities that AI systems offer. It then investigates the specific opportunities that AI presents in KM, including automation, data analysis, and
decision support, and provides examples of successful AI applications in knowledge management. The information that this study focused on was
collected from a group of articles and books that analyze knowledge management and the role of artificial intelligence in knowledge management. The
important topics that highlight the research idea were carefully researched leading to the discovery of the gap. Researching it, where a group of articles
were analyzed, and the purpose of each article was presented in a table of 10 factors. This research enables us to gain knowledge about the relationship
between the integration of knowledge management and artificial intelligence.
The review further examines how AI supports the fundamental dimensions of KM. It discusses how AI technologies can assist in knowledge creation
through techniques such as natural language processing and machine learning. It also explores how AI-powered systems facilitate efficient knowledge
storage, retrieval, and organization. The review highlights AI-based collaboration tools and platforms that enable effective knowledge sharing among
employees, as well as the ways in which AI supports the application of knowledge in decision-making and problem-solving.
 I. Introduction
The collaborative organization between people and artificial intelligence (AI) has ended up progressively noteworthy within the field of information
administration (KM). (Al Mansoori, S, Salloum, S. A, & Shaalan, K., 2020) As organizations recognize the esteem of successfully overseeing
information for competitive advantage, they are investigating the potential openings that AI frameworks offer in this space. (Adam, A., & Lindahl, G,
2017) This writing audit points to fundamentally look at the part of AI in KM and shed light on how the collaboration between people and AI can
improve information forms. (Davenport, 2018)

Information administration is the orderly handle of making, organizing, putting away, recovering, and applying information inside an organization. It
includes capturing implied and unequivocal information, making it open to workers, and leveraging it to move forward decision-making and problem-
solving. Successful KM hones empower organizations to saddle their collective information and mastery, driving to development, moved forward
efficiency, and way better organizational execution. (Ahmed, S, Fiaz, M.,, & Shoaib, M., 2015)

The rise of AI innovations has brought almost transformative conceivable outcomes in KM. (Wang, Z., Li, M., Lu, J., & Cheng, X., 2022) AI
frameworks have the capacity to mechanize schedule assignments, analyze tremendous sums of information, and give choice bolster, subsequently
increasing human capabilities in overseeing information. (Jain, S., & Jain, R, 2019) This audit investigates the openings that AI presents in KM, such
as mechanizing information capture and extraction, analyzing unstructured information, and helping in complex decision-making forms.

One of the key measurements of KM that AI underpins is information creation. Through strategies like common dialect handling and machine learning,
AI innovations can help in extricating experiences from unstructured information sources, creating unused information, and revealing designs and
patterns that people may neglect. AI-powered frameworks moreover play a pivotal part in information capacity, recovery, and organization,
empowering productive get to data and advancing the reuse of information.

Additionally, AI-based collaboration devices and stages encourage compelling information sharing among workers. These apparatuses interface
abilities to suggest important substance, interface people with comparative interface, and empower consistent collaboration over geologically scattered
groups. By cultivating collaboration and empowering the trade of differing viewpoints, AI contributes to the collective insights of organizations.

Be that as it may, it is imperative to consider the collaborative association between people and AI in KM. Whereas AI can improve information
processes, it is fundamental to preserve human association and skill. Methodologies for joining AI innovations into KM hones whereas protecting the
interesting capabilities of human specialists are significant. This audit investigates concepts such as expanded insights, which emphasizes the
collaboration and cooperative energy between human insights and AI capabilities. It too examines the significance of building belief, successful
communication, and a shared understanding between people and AI frameworks in KM exercises.

In conclusion, this writing audit gives a comprehensive investigation of the collaborative organization between people and AI in information
administration. By looking at the openings that AI presents in KM, as well as its part in supporting information creation, capacity, recovery, and
application, this survey highlights the transformative potential of AI in upgrading organizational information forms. The integration of AI innovations
into KM hones, whereas keeping up human involvement and skill, is vital for realizing the total benefits of this collaborative association.

Knowledge management includes the orderly preparation of making, organizing, putting away, recovering, and applying data inside an organization.
Effective KM hones enable organizations to tackle collective information and skill, driving to development, made strides effectiveness, and upgraded
organizational execution (Ahmed, Fiaz, & Shoaib, 2015). The appearance of AI innovations has presented transformative conceivable outcomes in
KM, permitting for the computerization of schedule errands, examination of tremendous sums of information, and arrangement of choice bolster to
expand human capabilities in data administration (Wang et al., 2022; Jain & Jain, 2019).

This audit investigates the multifaceted openings displayed by AI in KM, counting the computerization of information capture and extraction,
examination of unstructured information, and help of complex decision-making forms. AI underpins vital measurements of KM, especially data
creation. Leveraging strategies such as common dialect preparing and machine learning, AI can extricate bits of knowledge from unstructured
information sources, create unused data, and uncover designs that might escape human perception. AI too plays a essential part in data capacity,
recovery, and organization, encouraging productive get to data and advancing the reuse of information.

Moreover, AI-based collaboration instruments and stages play a key part in upgrading data sharing among representatives. These instruments interface
abilities to recommend significant substance, connect people with comparable interface, and empower consistent collaboration over topographically
scattered groups. By cultivating collaboration and encouraging the trade of different viewpoints, AI contributes to the collective insights of
organizations.

A. Research problem and GAP

In knowledge management (KM), the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) offers transformative and evolutionary potential.
However, be that as it may, there is a significant gap in understanding the impact of AI on knowledge management workflow, organization, and
organizational culture. Closing this gap is key to achieving consistent AI integration, improving workflow, addressing formal challenges, and
cultivating a positive culture that is open to AI developments in knowledge management. The gap represents the need for more research and to find
ideas and proposals about the impact of workflow, knowledge management, governance, and organizational culture during the application of artificial
intelligence in knowledge management.
 B. Research Aim/ objective
The main aim of this review is to investigate the collaborative partnership between humans and AI in KM. the study reviews the strategies for
integrating AI technologies into KM practices while maintaining human involvement and expertise, with an emphasis on augmented intelligence and
fostering collaboration, trust, and effective communication between humans and AI systems in KM activities.

C. Research Questions
This review tries to answer the following research questions.
1. How can AI systems be effectively integrated into knowledge management (KM) practices to enhance automation, data analysis, and decision
support?
2. What role does artificial intelligence play in facilitating the creation, storage, retrieval, and management of information in the context of
knowledge management, and how can this be improved?
3. What strategies and tools can be used to integrate AI into knowledge management practices, ensuring effective collaboration between humans
and AI systems while maintaining human expertise and engagement?
 II. Materials/Methods:
1.1 A critical review of knowledge management

An organization can use knowledge management to use and organize its knowledge in a way that promotes learning, innovation, and competitiveness.
(Carneiro, 2000) It is a strategic, integrated process. The aim is to convert knowledge that is implicit, explicit, experimental, and experiential into
knowledge that is valued and applicable. (Alavi, M & Tiwana, A, 2002)

Knowledge management encompasses gathering, recording, organizing, storing, and retrieving information in addition to enabling the methodical
sharing and dissemination of knowledge between individuals, groups, and departments. (Zhang, D, Zhou, L, & Nunamaker Jr, J. F, 2002) Using and
applying knowledge in decision-making and innovation processes is another way to promote ongoing learning and sustainable progress. (Van
Kerkhoff, L. & Lebel, L, 2006)

Organizations can increase their competitiveness by using knowledge management, a potent strategic instrument that makes it possible to employ both
internal and external knowledge effectively. (Chuang, 2004) Knowledge management enables businesses to increase performance and innovation and
make more strategic (Darroch, 2005)

Knowledge management is one of the modern and important practices in the knowledge era, where knowledge is the most valuable strategic resource
for organizations to achieve sustainable development and excellence. (Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U, Rehman, S. U.,, & Islam, T., 2020)
Peter Senge is one of the scientists who spoke about the importance of knowledge management. He said, “Knowledge management means providing
an appropriate environment for knowledge sharing and continuous learning within an organization” (Senge, 2006). Dorothy Leonard also
contributed to the development of knowledge management theory, pointing out the importance of recording and documenting organizational
knowledge and sharing it among organizational members (Leonard, 1995).
Tom Davenport introduced the ``Knowledge as an Asset'' theory that emphasizes that knowledge is one of the fundamental assets
of an organization and must be used effectively, so knowledge is one of the fundamental assets of management. He is considered
one of the leading researchers in the field (Davenport, 1997). Furthermore, Eric Bensoussan emphasizes the importance of knowledge management in
addressing organizational challenges and changes in the business environment (Bensoussan et al., 2013). These theories and concepts reflect the
importance of knowledge management in achieving competitiveness and innovation in institutions, and in achieving sustainable success in the face of
ongoing changes in the world.

What are the Origins and domain of knowledge management description of the Theoretical origins to knowledge management and Empirical
origins to knowledge management?

Origins and domain of knowledge management:

First: Theoretical origins to knowledge management:

The field of knowledge management (KM) can be considered an integral part of the broader concept of “intellectual capital” (Roos et al., 1997).
According to Guthrie (2000), KM involves the management of the “intellectual capital” that a company controls. However, the distinction
between KM and intellectual capital is often unclear and not sufficiently considered. Knowledge management issues are not new (Roos et al.,
1997), and the concept of intellectual capital is a comprehensive concept that includes various elements such as knowledge, experience,
technology, customer relationships, and specialized skills that ensure competitive advantage. functions as a term. exists in the market
(Edvinsson, 1997).
The origins of intellectual capital can be traced back to his two ideas: strategy and measurement. Strategically, the focus is on the creation and use of
knowledge and examining the relationship between knowledge and success or value creation (Roos et al., 1997). Measurement emphasizes the need to
develop new information systems that measure non-financial data in addition to traditional financial indicators (Guthrie, 2000). These conceptual
roots of intellectual capital emphasize the importance of understanding and managing knowledge to increase value and success.

Theoretical foundations of knowledge management focus on the concepts and theories that guide and support the practice of knowledge management.
Below are some common theoretical resources in the field of knowledge management.

1. Intellectual Capital Theory: Focuses on how to identify and measure intellectual capital within an organization and manage it effectively to achieve
competitive advantage.
2. Learning Process Theory: Focuses on how knowledge is acquired and distributed within an organization to foster continuous learning and
innovation.
3. Cognitive Innovation Theory: Focuses on how knowledge can be transformed into innovation and applied in manufacturing and continuous
improvement processes.
4. Network and Relationship Theory: Focuses on the importance of building and strengthening relationships and networks within and outside the
organization to share knowledge and foster mutual learning.
5. Organizational Culture Theory: Focuses on developing a culture that supports participation, continuous learning, and knowledge sharing within an
organization.
Conceptual roots of intellectual capital

The conceptual roots of intellectual capital can be traced back to the works of several researchers and scholars in the field of knowledge management
and organizational theory. (Serenko, A & Bontis, N., 2013)One influential framework that contributed to the understanding of intellectual capital is the
model proposed by Roos et al. in their 1997 article.

Roos et al. presented a framework that classifies intellectual capital into three main components: human capital, structural capital, and customer capital.
They defined human capital as the knowledge, skills, and capabilities of individuals within an organization. Structural capital refers to the supportive
infrastructure, processes, and systems that enable the creation and utilization of knowledge within an organization. Customer capital represented the
relationships and knowledge embedded in the organization's relationships with its customers and stakeholders.

This framework provided a comprehensive view of intellectual capital and emphasized the importance of different forms of knowledge and their
impact on organizational performance. It highlighted the significance of managing and leveraging intellectual capital as a strategic resource for
organizations.

Second: Empirical origins to knowledge management

Emphasizing the need for knowledge management: "Knowledge management is a vital strategy for companies in the knowledge era, where knowledge
can be a powerful source of competitiveness, innovation, and sustainable success" (Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995).

The main idea conveyed in this text is that the growth of “knowledge management” as a business strategy emerged in response to two fundamental
changes: downsizing and technological development.
In the 1980s, downsizing became a popular strategy for companies to reduce costs and increase profitability. The negative impact of downsizing on
knowledge: "Downsizing signifies a significant loss of organizational knowledge, as employees leave the company and take with them the knowledge
they have acquired over their years of work" (DiMattia and Oder, 1997).
However, one of the negative effects of downsizing was the loss of valuable knowledge as employees took their accumulated knowledge with them
and left the company. Organizations realized they had lost critical information and expertise and sought to protect themselves from similar losses
in the future.
To address this issue, companies are adopting "knowledge management" strategies that use technology and systems to capture and retain
employee knowledge.
The role of technology in knowledge management: "Technology can contribute to recording and storing organizational knowledge and enable effective
sharing and utilization" (Davenport and Prusak, 1998).
By storing this knowledge, it has become a reusable resource that can provide competitive advantages such as increased organizational capabilities,
increased performance, and reduced costs.
Advances in technology, especially the explosive growth of information resources such as the Internet and the rapid pace of technological change,
have further increased the importance of knowledge management. Overwhelmed by the amount of information, the need to address increased
knowledge in the workplace has arisen.
The development of new technologies has enabled the worldwide exchange of information and facilitated the effective use of knowledge within
organizations. By capturing a company's collective expertise in a database, organizations can better understand and systematically use knowledge.
1.2 Introduction to knowledge management and AI

Definition of Knowledge Management:

Knowledge management (KM) refers to the systematic processes, strategies, and activities employed by organizations to identify, create, capture, store,
organize, distribute, and utilize knowledge assets effectively. (Sokoh, G. C. & Okolie, U. C., 2021) It involves the acquisition, development, sharing,
and application of knowledge to enhance organizational performance, innovation, learning, and decision-making. (Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H.,,
Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A., 2019) KM encompasses both explicit knowledge (formalized and codified information) and tacit knowledge (personal
insights, experiences, and expertise) and aims to leverage these assets to achieve organizational goals. (K. Kakabadse, N.,, Kouzmin, A.,, &
Kakabadse, A, 2001)

Importance of Knowledge Management in Organizations:

1. Enhancing Decision Making: Knowledge management provides organizations with access to relevant and reliable information, insights, and
expertise, enabling informed decision-making at all levels. (Intezari, A., & Gressel, S., 2017) It ensures that decisions are based on the best available
knowledge, leading to improved outcomes and reduced risks.

2. Fostering Innovation: By effectively managing knowledge, organizations can promote a culture of innovation. KM facilitates the generation and
sharing of ideas, lessons learned, and best practices, fostering creativity, collaboration, and continuous improvement. (Armbrecht Jr, F. R., et al., 2001)

3. Enabling Learning and Development: Knowledge management supports organizational learning by capturing and disseminating knowledge gained
from past experiences, projects, and successes/failures. It facilitates learning loops, encourages knowledge sharing, and supports the development of
employees' skills and competencies.
 Trends and advancements in AI systems:

The rapid progress and ongoing advancements in AI systems are driving transformative changes across diverse industries. (Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Sree
Ramaswamy, P, DC, W., , & Chu, M., 2017) Deep learning, a powerful subset of machine learning, has emerged as a key driver of innovation by
leveraging neural networks with multiple layers to effectively analyze complex patterns and data. (Dimiduk, D. M., Holm, E. A.,, & Niezgoda, S. R.,
2018) This has yielded groundbreaking achievements in fields like image recognition, natural language processing, and speech synthesis, bolstering the
capabilities of AI systems. Natural Language Processing (NLP) has garnered significant attention as it aims to imbue machines with the ability to
comprehend and process human language. This has facilitated the development of sophisticated virtual assistants, chatbots, and language translation
systems, which are reshaping the way we interact with technology. Concurrently, advancements in computer vision have empowered machines to
interpret and comprehend visual information, propelling applications such as facial recognition, object detection, autonomous vehicles, and augmented
reality. The profound impact of these AI advancements is revolutionizing technological interactions and unlocking unprecedented opportunities across
multiple sectors.

Potential opportunities and benefits of implementing AI systems for KM.

The implementation of AI systems for knowledge management offers organizations numerous opportunities and benefits.
Firstly, AI enables enhanced knowledge discovery by automatically analyzing and categorizing vast amounts of data, uncovering valuable insights that
may be challenging for humans to identify. This leads to improved decision-making and a competitive advantage.
Secondly, AI automates knowledge capture and organization through NLP techniques, creating structured knowledge repositories and simplifying
search and retrieval processes. This facilitates easy access to relevant information and expertise for employees. Lastly, AI-powered virtual assistants,
chatbots, and collaboration tools promote intelligent knowledge sharing and collaboration, providing instant information access, personalized
recommendations, and connecting employees with the right expertise. These capabilities enhance innovation and problem-solving, driving
organizational success.

1.3 Opportunities of AI in knowledge management

AI technologies have the potential to greatly enhance knowledge management practices in several ways:

1. Knowledge Discovery and Insights, AI can analyze vast amounts of structured and unstructured data to uncover patterns, trends, and insights that
may not be readily apparent to humans. (Holzinger, A, et al., 2013) By applying machine learning algorithms, AI systems can identify hidden
relationships within data, extract valuable information, and generate new knowledge. (Chen) This enables organizations to make more informed
decisions and gain deeper insights into their data assets.

2. Intelligent Search and Retrieval, AI-powered search engines and recommendation systems can revolutionize the way knowledge is accessed and
retrieved. These systems utilize natural language processing and machine learning techniques to understand user queries, interpret context, and provide
highly relevant and personalized search results. (Fernández, M, et al., 2011)

3. Knowledge Capture and Organization, AI can automate the process of capturing, categorizing, and organizing knowledge assets. Natural Language
Processing algorithms can extract relevant information from unstructured data sources such as documents, emails, and reports, and automatically tag
and classify them. (Mah, P. M., Skalna, I., & Muzam, J., 2022) This streamlines the knowledge management process, making it easier for users to find
and contribute to the organization's knowledge repositories.
4. Intelligent Virtual Assistants and Chatbots, AI-powered virtual assistants and chatbots can provide instant access to knowledge and support.
(Balakrishnan, J. & Dwivedi, Y. K., 2021) These conversational agents can understand and respond to user queries, offering timely and accurate
information. They can guide users through knowledge repositories, provide recommendations, and even assist in decision-making processes. This
enhances knowledge sharing, improves productivity, and creates a more efficient and personalized user experience.

5. Collaboration and Expertise Identification: AI technologies can facilitate collaboration by connecting individuals with relevant expertise and
knowledge. By analyzing data such as job roles, skills, and past contributions, AI systems can identify subject matter experts within an organization.
This promotes effective knowledge sharing and collaboration, enabling employees to access the right expertise when needed, regardless of
geographical or hierarchical boundaries.

Examples of successful AI applications in knowledge management

There are several successful AI applications in knowledge management that have demonstrated tangible benefits for organizations. Here are a few
examples:

1. IBM Watson: IBM Watson is a well-known AI system that has been applied to knowledge management in various industries. It utilizes
natural language processing and machine learning to analyze vast amounts of data, including scientific papers, research articles, and clinical
records. By understanding and extracting key information from these sources, Watson assists researchers, doctors, and professionals in
accessing relevant knowledge quickly, making evidence-based decisions, and staying updated with the latest advancements in their fields.
2. Salesforce Einstein: Salesforce Einstein is an AI-powered platform that incorporates machine learning and natural language processing to
enhance knowledge management within customer relationship management (CRM) systems. It helps organizations capture and analyze
customer interactions, emails, and other relevant data to identify patterns, predict customer needs, and provide personalized recommendations.
By leveraging AI, Salesforce Einstein enables sales and customer service teams to access valuable insights, optimize knowledge sharing, and
deliver improved customer experiences.

3. Google's Knowledge Graph: Google's Knowledge Graph is a powerful AI application that enhances knowledge management in search
engines. It organizes information into a structured graph, connecting entities, facts, and relationships. This enables users to obtain
comprehensive and contextually relevant search results. By leveraging AI algorithms, the Knowledge Graph enhances knowledge discovery,
provides concise summaries, and helps users explore related topics, thereby improving the efficiency and effectiveness of knowledge retrieval.

4. Chatbots for Internal Knowledge Sharing: Many organizations have implemented AI-powered chatbots to facilitate knowledge sharing
among employees. These chatbots use natural language processing to understand queries and provide responses or recommendations based on
the organization's knowledge repositories. By serving as virtual assistants, these chatbots enable employees to quickly access information, find
experts, and collaborate effectively, promoting efficient knowledge sharing and reducing information silos.

5. OpenAI's GPT (Generative Pre-Trained Transformer): OpenAI's GPT models, including GPT-3, have shown promise in knowledge
management applications. They can generate human-like text based on prompts, making them useful for automating tasks like summarizing
documents, answering questions, and creating knowledge base articles. By leveraging GPT models, organizations can improve the efficiency of
knowledge creation, curation, and dissemination.
1.4 AI support for Fundamental Dimensions of KM

Topic 1: AI Support in Knowledge Capture and Creation

AI support plays a crucial role in facilitating knowledge capture and creation within organizations. With the help of advanced AI technologies,
organizations can efficiently extract and generate knowledge from various sources. Natural Language Processing (NLP) techniques enable AI systems
to analyze and understand textual information, making it easier to extract knowledge from documents, databases, and unstructured data. AI-powered
chatbots and virtual assistants further enhance knowledge creation by interacting with users, answering questions, and documenting conversations. By
automating these processes, AI systems streamline knowledge capture and creation, saving time and effort for employees and enabling them to focus
on higher-value tasks.

Topic 2: AI Support in Knowledge Organization and Classification

In the realm of knowledge management, AI algorithms provide valuable support in organizing and classifying knowledge. By leveraging machine
learning techniques such as clustering and classification, AI systems can automatically categorize and classify information based on predefined
taxonomies or ontologies. This automated organization enables users to easily locate relevant knowledge within repositories, improving efficiency and
reducing the time spent searching for information., AI algorithms can uncover patterns and relationships within knowledge repositories, helping to
identify connections and insights that might otherwise remain hidden.

Topic 3: AI Support in Knowledge Sharing and Access

AI support plays a vital role in facilitating knowledge sharing and access within organizations. Traditional knowledge management systems often face
challenges in ensuring that knowledge is easily accessible to employees across different departments and locations. AI-powered recommendation
systems address this challenge by leveraging machine learning algorithms to provide personalized and relevant recommendations to users based on
their specific needs and preferences. These systems analyze user behavior, search patterns, and contextual information to suggest relevant knowledge
resources, documents, experts, or communities of practice. AI chatbots and virtual assistants further enhance knowledge access by providing instant
and accurate responses to user queries, thereby promoting self-service knowledge retrieval. By improving knowledge sharing and access, AI systems
enable organizations to harness the collective intelligence of their workforce, foster collaboration, and make informed decisions based on readily
available knowledge resources.

1.5 Collaborative partnership between Human and AI in knowledge management

Collaborative partnership between humans and AI in knowledge management is a powerful and transformative approach that combines the strengths of
both entities to optimize knowledge processes within organizations. Humans bring their contextual understanding, creativity, and critical thinking
abilities, while AI systems contribute their computational power, data analysis capabilities, and automation. Together, they form a symbiotic
relationship where humans and AI work hand in hand to enhance knowledge capture, organization, sharing, and application.

In this collaborative partnership, humans play a crucial role in providing domain expertise, intuition, and judgment. They interact with AI systems to
guide knowledge extraction, validate, and interpret results, and make informed decisions based on the insights generated. Humans also contribute to the
continuous improvement of AI models and algorithms through feedback and iterative refinement. On the other hand, AI systems support humans by
automating repetitive tasks, analyzing vast amounts of data at high speeds, and uncovering patterns and correlations that may be beyond human
capacity.
Example scenario illustrating the collaborative partnership between humans and AI in knowledge management:
In an article titled "Enhancing Knowledge Management through Collaborative Human-AI Partnerships," researchers explored the implementation of
AI technologies in a large manufacturing company. The company utilized AI-powered data analytics tools to analyze vast amounts of production data
and identify potential areas for process optimization. However, they recognized that human expertise was essential to interpret the data insights and
make informed decisions. Therefore, a collaborative partnership was established, where data analysts and AI systems worked together. The AI systems
automated data processing and provided valuable insights, while human analysts brought their domain knowledge and critical thinking to validate and
contextualize the findings. This collaborative approach led to improved decision-making, enhanced operational efficiency, and a more effective
knowledge management strategy within the organization.

Gap:
The need for further research on the impact of AI on KM workflows, governance, and organizational culture.

In the evolving landscape of knowledge management (KM), the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) introduces a transformative potential, yet a
significant gap exists in understanding its impact on KM workflows, administration, and organizational culture. Addressing this gap is crucial for the
seamless incorporation of AI innovations into KM practices, ensuring not only their successful adoption but also effective implementation within
organizational structures.

KM Workflows:
The introduction of AI into KM workflows has the potential to revolutionize the way information is processed, stored, and disseminated.
Understanding the dynamics of how AI influences the flow of knowledge within an organization is paramount. This involves examining how AI
technologies streamline data handling, automate repetitive tasks, and facilitate more efficient knowledge dissemination. Insights into these aspects are
essential for optimizing KM workflows and ensuring that the integration of AI aligns with the existing processes or prompts necessary adaptations.

Administration:
The impact of AI on KM administration encompasses the managerial aspects of overseeing AI-augmented systems. This involves addressing questions
related to how AI influences decision-making processes, data governance, and the overall administration of knowledge assets. Additionally,
understanding the administrative challenges and opportunities that arise with AI integration is vital for developing effective governance structures. This
includes considerations for data privacy, security, and compliance within the framework of KM administration.

Organizational Culture:
The infusion of AI into KM practices inevitably shapes and is shaped by the organizational culture. Understanding how AI technologies influence the
attitudes, behaviors, and values within an organization is a critical aspect of successful implementation. The cultural impact extends to employee
perceptions of AI, their willingness to collaborate with AI systems, and the overall receptiveness to change. A comprehensive exploration of the
interplay between AI and organizational culture is essential for fostering a positive and adaptive environment that embraces the benefits AI brings to
KM.

In essence, bridging the identified gap requires a nuanced examination of the intricate relationships between AI, KM workflows, administration, and
organizational culture. Insights derived from such an exploration provide a foundation for informed decision-making in the integration process.
Recognizing the interdependencies between these components ensures that AI is not merely a technological add-on but a catalyst for cultural and
procedural evolution within organizations. Thus, addressing this gap becomes imperative for organizations aspiring to harness the full potential of AI
in advancing their knowledge management practices.
 Author purpose Research Research Questions & hypothesis Independent variables Dependent Variables
Name/topic of Methodology
the paper
Mohammad The research paper aims to explore the The research paper 1. What are the opportunities associated with 1. Implementation of 1. Knowledge creation, storage,
Hossein potential of emerging artificial intelligence adopts a qualitative implementing emerging AI systems for knowledge emerging AI systems in retrieval, sharing, and application in
Jarrahi, (AI) systems in the realm of knowledge approach to explore management (KM)? KM practices. KM.
David Askay, management (KM). As AI capabilities the opportunities 2. How can AI support the fundamental dimensions of 2. Collaborative 2. Effectiveness and efficiency of
Ali Eshraghi , continue to advance, they are expected to play associated with KM, including knowledge creation, storage and partnership between KM processes.
Preston Smith a significant role in various organizational implementing AI retrieval, sharing, and application? humans and AI in KM 3. Successful implementation of AI
Artificial activities. The paper focuses on uncovering systems for 3. What practical strategies can be proposed to activities. systems in KM.
intelligence and the opportunities that arise from knowledge establish a collaborative partnership between humans 3. Consideration of
knowledge implementing AI-powered systems in KM. management (KM). and AI in organizational KM activities? people, infrastructures,
management: A The authors highlight four fundamental It involves a 4. What are the implications for the development and and processes in AI
partnership dimensions of KM: knowledge creation, comprehensive management of AI systems in KM, considering the system development and
between human storage and retrieval, sharing, and application. review and analysis components of people, infrastructures, and processes? management.
and AI They discuss how AI can support each of of existing literature Hypothesis:
these dimensions and elucidate the potential on AI and KM to H1: The integration of AI systems in KM practices
benefits. By leveraging AI technologies, identify key insights enhances knowledge creation, storage, retrieval, sharing,
organizations can enhance their ability to and potential and application.
create, store, retrieve, share, and apply applications. The H2: Establishing a collaborative partnership between
knowledge effectively Furthermore, the paper authors also draw on humans and AI in KM activities improves the effectiveness
proposes practical ways to establish a case studies and and efficiency of knowledge management processes.
partnership between humans and AI in the real-world examples H3: Considering the components of people, infrastructures,
context of KM. It emphasizes the importance to support their and processes in the development and management of AI
of collaboration and integration between arguments and systems enhances their successful implementation in KM.
human expertise and AI capabilities. provide practical
illustrations.
GAP Value added to the study Comment & Remark Design and Approach Research Findings
Limitations/Implications
The research paper The research adds value The research paper presents a rigorous The design of the study The research acknowledges The research paper highlights
addresses a gap in the by providing practical analysis of the integration of AI and KM, is primarily conceptual certain limitations. Firstly, it the significant role that AI can
existing literature by insights and offering valuable insights into the potential and analytical, relies on a qualitative analysis play in supporting KM. It
providing a recommendations for benefits and challenges associated with AI- focusing on the of existing literature and case identifies specific
comprehensive analysis organizations seeking to enabled knowledge management. The integration of AI into studies, which may introduce opportunities where AI
of the integration of AI incorporate AI into their conceptual and analytical approach provides KM practices. The biases and limitations technologies can augment the
and KM. While KM initiatives. By a solid foundation for understanding the role authors examine the inherent to secondary data efficiency and effectiveness of
previous studies have synthesizing existing of AI in different dimensions of KM. The theoretical foundations sources. Secondly, the knowledge-related processes.
explored AI's potential literature and proposing research questions and hypotheses are well- of KM and explore findings are based on the The findings emphasize the
in various domains, novel approaches, the formulated, guiding the investigation and how AI technologies current state of AI potential of AI in automating
there is a need for a study offers a analysis. The identification of independent can enhance different technologies and KM routine tasks, facilitating
focused examination of comprehensive framework and dependent variables provides clarity on aspects of knowledge practices, and future knowledge discovery,
its implications for KM for integrating AI the factors under examination and their creation, storage, advancements may influence enabling personalized
practices. This research technologies effectively. expected impact. The research gap is retrieval, sharing, and the validity and applicability knowledge delivery, and
aims to fill that gap by Furthermore, the research appropriately addressed, and the value- application. They also of the research. Lastly, the enhancing decision-making
exploring the explores the social and added by the study is significant, offering propose practical study primarily focuses on the based on insights derived from
opportunities, ethical implications of AI- practical implications for organizations and strategies and organizational context, and large datasets.
challenges, and enabled KM, highlighting highlighting social and ethical approaches for the implications for other
practical strategies for the importance of considerations, the research contributes to building a domains such as education or
leveraging AI in KM, responsible AI adoption the field of AI-enabled KM and stimulates collaborative healthcare are not extensively
contributing to a and addressing potential further exploration in this area. partnership between explored. Further research is
deeper understanding concerns. humans and AI in KM needed to address these
of the subject. activities. limitations and expand the
understanding of AI-enabled
KM in diverse contexts
 Author Name/topic of purpose
the paper
Shu-hsien Liao The purpose of the study outlined
in the abstract is to conduct a
Knowledge management literature review and classification
technologies and of articles from 1995 to 2002 to
applications—literature examine the development of
review from 1995 to knowledge management (KM)
2002 technologies and applications
during that period. The study aims
to survey and categorize KM
technologies based on the scope of
234 articles, utilizing seven
categories including KM
framework, knowledge-based
systems, data mining, information
and communication technology,
artificial intelligence/expert
systems, database technology, and
modelling. The paper also discusses
future directions for KM
technologies and applications, such
as the development of expert-
oriented technologies, the
incorporation of social studies
methodologies, the integration of
qualitative and quantitative
methods, and the ability of KM
technologies to adapt and generate
new insights. The study seeks to
contribute to the understanding of
KM development and provide
insights for future research in the
field.
Research Methodology
The methodology of the
study involved conducting a
literature review and
classification of articles
published from 1995 to
2002. The researchers
conducted a comprehensive
search to identify relevant
articles on knowledge
management (KM)
technologies and
applications within this
specified timeframe. The
selected articles were then
analyzed and categorized
based on their content and
focus using seven predefined
categories related to KM
technologies. The
researchers examined the
scope of 234 articles and
conducted a thorough
analysis to identify trends
and developments in KM
technologies and their
applications. The findings
from this analysis were used
to provide insights into the
trajectory of KM technology
development and suggest
directions for future research
in the field.
Research Questions & Independent variables Dependent Variables
hypothesis
1. What are the key 1. "Time Period (1995- "Development of KM
categories of KM 2002) Technologies and Applications:
technologies that emerged Trends and Advancements from
between 1995 and 2002, 2. "Categories of KM 1995 to 2002
based on the analysis of Technologies
the 234 selected articles?
2. How have KM 3. "Social Studies
technologies evolved in Methodologies in KM
terms of their orientation
towards expert knowledge
and problem domains
during the specified
timeframe?
3. What potential exists
for integrating qualitative
and quantitative methods
in KM studies, and how
can this integration
enhance our
understanding of KM
technologies?
4. In what ways can the
continual adaptation and
generation of new insights
by KM technologies
contribute to future
applications in knowledge
management?
GAP
Despite the significant efforts
made by the knowledge
management (KM) community
in developing a wide range of
technologies and applications for
academic research and practical
use, there appears to be a gap in
the literature regarding a
comprehensive exploration of
KM technologies and their
applications during the period
from 1995 to 2002. While the
text mentions that the Internet's
emergence in 1994 played a
crucial role in information and
communication technology and
its impact on KM, there is no
explicit mention of a
comprehensive analysis or
classification of KM technologies
during this specific timeframe.
Therefore, the research gap can
be described as the need for a
literature review and
classification study that
specifically focuses on exploring
the development and
applications of KM technologies
between 1995 and 2002,
considering the evolving
landscape of information and
communication technology.
Value added to the study
The study described in the provided
text adds value by conducting a
comprehensive literature review
and classification of articles from
1995 to 2002, focusing on the
development and applications of
knowledge management (KM)
technologies. By systematically
analyzing a wide range of articles,
the study provides a comprehensive
overview of the state of KM
technologies during that period.
This review adds value by
identifying trends, frameworks,
methodologies, and real-world
implementations of KM
technologies, thereby contributing
to a deeper understanding of the
field. Additionally, by categorizing
KM technologies into specific
domains such as KM frameworks,
knowledge-based systems, data
mining, information and
communication technology,
artificial intelligence/expert
systems, database technology, and
modeling, the study offers valuable
insights for researchers and
practitioners in terms of
technological advancements and
potential applications.
Comment & Remark
1. The use of a literature
review and keyword index
search methodology
provides a solid foundation
for conducting a
comprehensive analysis of
KM technologies and
applications during the
specified timeframe. This
approach ensures a
systematic and rigorous
examination of the existing
body of knowledge in the
field.
2. The observation that KM
technologies tend to develop
towards expert orientation is
an interesting finding. It
suggests a shift towards
leveraging specialized
knowledge and expertise in
KM practices, which can be
beneficial in addressing
complex challenges and
facilitating effective
knowledge sharing within
organizations.
Design and Approach
The approach begins with the
literature search, which
yields a substantial number
of articles related to KM. The
researchers then apply topic
filtering to narrow down the
articles to those specifically
focused on KM applications
and KM technology
methodologies. Through this
process, a final set of relevant
articles is identified for
further analysis. To
categorize the KM
technologies, the study
employs a classification
framework consisting of
seven categories: KM
framework, knowledge-based
systems (KBS), data mining
(DM), information and
communication technology
(ICT), artificial intelligence
(AI)/expert systems (ES),
database technology (DT),
and modeling. These
categories serve as a
structured framework for
organizing and understanding
the different types of KM
technologies discussed in the
selected articles.
Research Findings
Limitations/Implications
1. Database Bias: The 1. KM technologies tended to
study's reliance on the develop towards an expert
Elsevier SDOS database orientation, highlighting the
may introduce a bias importance of leveraging
towards articles published specialized knowledge and
on that platform, expertise.
potentially excluding
relevant sources from 2. KM applications were primarily
other databases. focused on problem-oriented
domains, emphasizing the practical
2. Narrow Focus: By nature of KM in addressing
focusing specifically on specific challenges.
KM applications and
technology 3. The study suggests the
methodologies, the study integration of different social
may overlook other studies methodologies, such as
important aspects of KM, statistical methods, to enhance the
such as organizational rigor and depth of KM research.
culture or knowledge
sharing practices. 4. The integration of qualitative
and quantitative methods, as well
3. Categorization as the integration of different KM
Limitations: The technology studies, was
classification framework recommended to gain a broader
used to categorize KM understanding of the field.
technologies into seven
categories may
oversimplify the
complexity of the field,
potentially missing out on
important nuances.
 10 factors table:

Topic of the Summary Of The Paper Paper link

paper/
Author’s
name
A critical The term paper investigates the concept of information administration (KM) http://modir3-3.ir/article-english/
review of and its noteworthiness in organizations. The presentation highlights the article432.pdf
knowledge expanding acknowledgment of information as a basic calculate for organizational
management survival and competitiveness. It distinguishes different strengths driving the require
for organizations to adjust and emphasizes the significance of workers as
as a
a maintainable competitive advantage. The paper points to characterize and investigate
management the space of KM, it’s down to earth suggestions, and potential issues. The
tool Author: creator conducts a writing audit on KM, centering on articles utilizing
Maria catchphrases such as "information administration" and "technique." The audit
MaÊrtensson essentially incorporates practical-oriented writing, reflecting the business-driven nature
of KM. The segment too recognizes the impediments of the
survey, such as the limit center on watchwords and the deficient
representation of the concept of information. The paper is separated into.
three segments: roots and space of KM, KM as an administration,
information-handling, and vital instrument, and a basic examination of the
concept. The creator raises questions almost the need and adequacy.
of KM as an administration device, drawing a refinement between KM and
"Mental capital." The paper too investigates the vital arranging and
operational administration of information, with a center on esteem creation and
execution. The term paper gives a diagram of KM, its
definition, and its viable suggestions. It examines the roots of the
concept, its relationship with mental capital, and its significance to
vital administration arranging. The paper points to shed light on the
understanding and application of KM in organizations.
A strategy for This term paper looks at the impact of the organizational https://mediatum.ub.tum.de/doc/
knowledge environment on the choice of information administration (KM) methodologies 1323623/document.pdf
management and their effect on the victory of KM activities. The ponder centers on the
Author: relationship between commerce methodology and KM methodology and how adjusting
These procedures can contribute to organizational victory. The investigate is
Martina E.
based on a case think about of 11 German and Swiss companies, categorizing KM
Greiner, Tilo activities based on different criteria and assessing their fit with the
Bo ̈hmann and individual trade techniques of the organizations. The discoveries show a
Helmut association between the victory of KM and the arrangement of KM procedure
Krcmar with trade technique. The paper recommends that organizations with a
commerce procedure cantered around handle effectiveness ought to prioritize a
codification methodology, whereas those with a technique emphasizing
product/process advancement ought to center on a personalization methodology.
The foremost fruitful KM ventures were driven by a solid trade require
and pointed to include esteem to the operations of the organizational unit. The
inquire about recognizes impediments due to the subjective nature of the
ponder, counting the dependence on coherent instead of factual conclusions, a
little test estimate, and subjective translations. The commonsense suggestions
highlight the significance of understanding the targets and commerce
forms of the organizational unit when selecting a KM methodology that
adjusts with the general trade procedure. The paper contributes to the
understanding of how organizational natural components impact the
victory of KM activities. By looking at the relationship between trade
Overview of The concept of information administration (KM) developed within the early 1990s https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/
Knowledge as an orderly exertion by organizations to use their collective 46963249/ir.3420160702-378-xkeoow-
information. KM coordinating different disciplines such as human assets, libre.pdf?1467494213=&response-content-
Management disposition=inline%3B+filename
Author: organizational advancement, data innovation, and execution
%3DOverview_of_Knowledge_Management
estimation. In spite of being a moderately youthful field, KM has gained
Andreea M. .pdf&Expires=1701680821&Signature=MN
noteworthy ubiquity within the trade world, with committed diaries,
Serban, Jing conferences, and counseling bunches centering on it. Industry specialists foresee
Gj5odmoOy6mSICpnkTGTtKaZvXrmckB1
Luan ~T6ZWjr~9DJvWf3yvrjl0IAdS54HJi8htk53
that the worldwide information administration showcase will be worth billions of bDHk-PYYfVR-
dollar, with considerable development anticipated in computer program and benefit ghwQ4AZ3v5mODS6dPnq2At65Gtl9f-
divisions. 4Z9WZVFYxfU-
The commerce openings displayed by KM are significant. An overview CoT68Soat4tyvEKTTYBr9hiKMNgmeIRt3b
conducted in 2001 found that 90 percent of companies executing KM xOHRO59ymcJ1rgYXm5f96KHOVpvLWE
arrangements detailed progressed choice making, whereas 81 percent C-p4TrfU-
moYQrSOduKY5U~iBXknjqVeYO8kdvRP
 experienced expanded efficiency. These positive results can be 17IiIbFTxIynFwJh6jFM9PJqjbKwIj7tgiZLP
ascribed to progressions in innovation and other components driving the hhMSBr4pLeUEpo8336ycBVA48wu5PTzR
development of KM. the field of KM has rapidly picked up acknowledgment and KwnhKrt9Ud4MtajPecqlyUaOQImOPsVcO
appropriation eXD4frjJnJNA__&Key-Pair-
Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
in organizations around the world. Its potential benefits in terms of superior
choice making and expanded efficiency make it an appealing
speculation for businesses looking for to use their mental capital

Knowledge This research paper focuses on the emerging field of knowledge management and https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/
management highlights the importance of artificial intelligence (AI) in its development. Knowledge 31076572/Clanok1-libre.pdf?
management is gaining significant interest from both industry and government as 1392245846=&response-content-
and its link to disposition=inline%3B+filename
arti®cial organizations strive to transform individual knowledge into organizational knowledge.
%3DKnowledge_management_and_its_link_
The paper argues that AI is a key component in the advancement of knowledge
intelligence to_art.pdf&Expires=1701680866&Signature
management, but it is often overlooked by practitioners and theorists in the field. AI has
Author: J. the potential to revolutionize knowledge management practices by enabling advanced
=fqSea8CtQQyk1xpLRDiNMZVCOMctzTs
Liebowitz* qlLBA3AUo6uFmN6f5D4olm5oTJ~XAp42
data analysis, automation, and intelligent decision-making. The paper explores the FA5i~AsurAlTbd-
emergence and future trajectory of knowledge management, emphasizing the need to SCpENswiNF~dVoIt4kcMsgrq26g57TTLQv
recognize and incorporate AI technologies and techniques. AI can enhance knowledge W4NKNlarkll4ifBn6g~B1me-
management processes by facilitating efficient knowledge capture, storage, retrieval, and IOqaF7Uy9Fjy83No1zXY0hWFWdB8UAPI
dissemination within organizations. By discussing the link between knowledge 8Hb~zSIvZg1G8wWkS6L5eq2tDj3mzYNjc
management and AI, the paper highlights the crucial role that AI plays in the success of hOepmTpcFvJjL3ereo~8XofIRfAPq4RUwH
knowledge organizations. It suggests that incorporating AI into knowledge management w1luDU8v0lu~wM0KBL6nSNxVyyWOP07
strategies can lead to improved organizational performance, innovation, and kGZsBo~uLZsmyEVG91xSqr53CLBUT9T-
b8Yd0iKWF1gY7w63vAyOL3umYDQe8x4
competitiveness., the paper emphasizes the significance of AI in the field of knowledge
7fA309e4~vO-Q__&Key-Pair-
management and calls for greater attention to be given to the integration of AI Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
technologies and practices. It provides a valuable perspective on the future direction of
knowledge management and the potential benefits that can be achieved through the
application of AI.
The Impact of The reason of this study is to examine the effect of Data Innovation (IT) and https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/64016732/
The_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence-libre.pdf?
Artificial Manufactured Insights (AI) on information administration practices in present day 1595690508=&response-content-disposition=inline
Intelligence and organizations. Whereas information administration has been broadly investigated, there %3B+filename
Information has been constrained investigation of how the application of IT and AI concepts and %3DThe_Impact_of_Artificial_Intelligence_an.pdf&Ex
pires=1701645185&Signature=RRQdCtvgb28kWp3~Nd
Technologies on strategies can upgrade the proficiency of information administration. hab5F9fpYVCA5HwEagX6QOJjDNwwV46YUjAJFt8v
the Efficiency of sNTaobWIyAvP6ilUfmBILGcvHfNS0LiDudqdo9hzDpj
pdp1428f8N6ZZuJUXyEmADSpUalr-
Knowledge The analysts point to fill this hole by conducting a efficient audit of 15 investigate papers 77tbvnq5hjfQ6cdqX-ZZ5wm-
Management at distributed between 2009 and 2019. These papers, chosen from trustworthy diaries and fVwTt~IPmM69pRAqbLhOzO7W8yrDpaJl0L1y4WdN
Modern conference procedures, will be analyzed to recognize the current information R6F2qKr3L6OtWvd4eMNXd9HkWpx0IfC1Qz-
Td5ZtX7t-
Organizations: administration hones that depend on IT and AI instruments. The ponder will moreover IPLS2EjV~37QHza~4iRhcHPUSGyBJIyN45dbR4xPAj
A Systematic investigate the challenges and confinements related with these hones. ot47WJ40fAnks4K2SuE8lAAfq1dfyPIx0vDqdf9K-
Review LwJMdZ-UKsu-Kw8I7tt6Q__&Key-Pair-
Id=APKAJLOHF5GGSLRBV4ZA
The discoveries of this survey ponder will contribute to the existing body of information
Saeed Al administration, especially in connection to IT and AI. By highlighting the impacts of IT
Mansoori, Said and AI on information administration, the analysts look for to supply important bits of
A. Salloum, knowledge for organizations looking for to progress their information administration
and Khaled hones.
Shaalan
This thought is noteworthy since it addresses a basic perspective of present-day
organizational victory. As innovation proceeds to advance, leveraging IT and AI in
information administration becomes progressively imperative. By looking at the current
state of information administration hones including IT and AI, this think about will give
an important reference for scholars, researchers, and organizations curious about
understanding and improving their information administration forms.
Knowledge The reason of this study is to investigate the transformative potential of Artificial https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/51de/
Management Intelligence (AI) within the framework of Industry 4.0, specifically within the setting of 979b3849c2e32182d096a27555f66d67e5
and Artificial the development industry within the United Kingdom. As the industry experiences a 62.pdf
Intelligence worldview move towards digitization, the integration of AI stands out as a significant
constrain with the capacity to reshape information administration (KM) hones. The
(AI)
development division, customarily dependent on experiential learning and review
examinations, is progressively recognizing the requirement for precise information
Haddy Jallow, extraction from past projects to inform future endeavors.
Suresh
Renukappa, This research looks for to explore how AI innovations can enhance KM within the
and Subashini development space by gathering experiences from earlier projects. Through a subjective
Suresh research approach, utilizing 10 semi-structured interviews with industry directors, the
 ponder points to explain the current landscape of AI adoption and its impact on KM
inside development organizations. The examination expands to the identification of
existing AI frameworks executed inside ventures and organizations, shedding light on
their viability in facilitating consistent KM. Furthermore, the think about advocates for
the advancement of a commerce show canvas to deliberately actualize AI, separating
between KM forms with and without AI integration. Eventually, the inquire about
endeavors to contribute important experiences that can direct the development industry
towards ideal utilization of AI for knowledge enhancement, cultivating a more proficient
and educated approach to project administration within the time of Industry 4.0.
Mutual Benefits The reason of this study is to dive into the underexplored crossing point of Manufactured https://dl.acm.org/doi/pdf/
for Al & Law Insights (AI), Law, and Information Administration (KM), recognizing the significant 10.1145/323706.323725
and Knowledge potential for mutual progression and viable benefits. Right now, these spaces are often
Management examined in confinement, with restricted consideration to their combined effect. This
inquiry about fights that a comprehensive examination of the exchange between AI, Law,
Anja Oskamp and KM can surrender synergies that upgrade both hypothetical understanding and
Maaike W. commonsense applications inside the legitimate scene.
Tragter Arno R.
Lodder The study points to bridge the hole between AI and Law, pushing for the integration of
information administration standards into AI frameworks for the legal space. By doing
so, the investigation looks to enhance the effectiveness of legal forms through improved
data recovery, examination, and decision-making. At the same time, the study explores
the application of AI advances to information administration inside the legal setting,
expecting that these synergies will give legal experts with more versatile, context-aware
instruments for dealing with complex legitimate scenarios.

In pushing for the meeting of AI, Law, and KM, the consider envisions not as it were
contributing to scholastic talk but moreover advertising substantial experiences for
legitimate professionals. By leveraging AI to extricate and oversee lawful information
successfully, experts can explore the complexities of case law, controls, and points of
reference more adeptly. Eventually, the inquire about points to emphasize the potential of
this intrigue approach, emphasizing its part in reshaping lawful information
administration hones and cultivating more educated, versatile, and productive legitimate
frameworks.
APPLICATION The reason of this study is to address the heightening threat of cybercrimes within the https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/
S OF wake of fast data innovation (IT) advancements. As criminals exploit the internet for 1502/1502.03552.pdf
ARTIFICIAL unlawful exercises, conventional observing and assurance measures demonstrate
INTELLIGENC insufficient against the advancing scene of cyber dangers. The vulnerabilities in cyber
E frameworks require the improvement of more modern defense frameworks that are not as
TECHNIQUES it were adaptable and versatile but too vigorous sufficient to distinguish a differing
TO cluster of dangers and make clever real-time choices.
COMBATING
CYBER Recognizing the basics for improved cybersecurity, this inquiry about centers on the
CRIMES: A application of bio-inspired computing strategies inside the domain of Counterfeit Insights
REVIEW (AI) for cybercrime location and avoidance. The consider points to explain the strides
made in utilizing AI strategies to combat cyber-crimes, exhibiting their viability as a
Selma Dilek1, proactive tool in recognizing and upsetting cyber assaults. By showing the current state
Hüseyin Çakır2 of the field, the investigation not as it were contributing to the understanding of AI's part
and Mustafa in cybersecurity but too serves as a foundation for future endeavors in this crucial space.
Aydın3
Eventually, this consider looks for to emphasize the significance of AI in fortifying cyber
protections, advertising experiences into the advancing scene of cyber dangers and
giving a guide for further research and advancement within the progressing fight against
cyber violations.
ACOMPREHE This study aims to comprehensively look at the inescapable impact of Manufactured https://www.researchgate.net/profile/
NSIVE Insights (AI) innovation on the instruction division. As AI proceeds to saturate different Gopala-Sriram/publication/
OVERVIEW perspectives of human life, the field of instruction has grasped AI devices and procedures 361912952_A_COMPREHENSIVE_OV
OF to expand understudy learning capabilities and improve by and large instructive ERVIEW_OF_ARTIFICIAL_INTELLI
ARTIFICIAL highlights. This inquiry about centers on digging into the multifaceted part of AI in GENCE_TENDS_IN_EDUCATION/
INTELLIGENC instruction, enveloping its effect on learning forms, directions strategies, and regulatory links/62cc871b00d0b4511049daf0/A-
E TENDS IN capacities inside instructive educate. COMPREHENSIVE-OVERVIEW-OF-
EDUCATION The research fastidiously investigates and examines superior AI advances, giving a brief ARTIFICIAL-INTELLIGENCE-
however quick outline of each technology's potential commitments to the instruction TENDS-IN-EDUCATION.pdf
Bharatwaja division. By displaying a comprehensive examination, this Research points to shed light
Namatherdhala on the transformative impacts of AI devices and advances over all aspects of instruction.
*1, Noman It serves as a profitable asset for understanding the nuanced ways in which AI
Mazher*2, developments impact and reshape the instructive scene.
Gopal Krishna As a significant commitment to the broader talk on AI in instruction, this investigates
Sriram*3 positions itself as a stay, covering basic regions inside the instruction segment affected
by AI. By tending to the differing parts of AI, the think about gives a establishment for
 encourage investigate and talks within the progressing advancement of instruction
through the integration of progressed AI devices and innovations.

Machine The purpose of this study is to dive into the domain of Machine Learning (ML) as https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?
Learning characterized by Michie et al. (D. Michie, 1994), particularly centering on its repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=72bfa0a326e
Overview applications in classification. ML, inside the setting of this investigation, alludes to 4385ac46916e840e9fdc73a98b9fb
programmed computing strategies grounded in consistent or parallel operations that
Taiwo procure the capacity to perform an assignment through introduction to an arrangement of
Oladipupo cases. The essential concern here is classification, with a specific accentuation on
Ayodele decision-tree approaches, where classification comes about stem from an arrangement of
coherent steps.

While consideration has overwhelmingly centered on decision-tree techniques, this

consider recognizes the advancing scene of ML procedures. This incorporates, but isn't
constrained to, hereditary calculations and inductive rationale methods (ILP), effectively
beneath advancement. These approaches open roads for dealing with more common sorts
of information, pleasing changing traits and sorts, as well as progressive structures of
learning with different layers.

The center point of ML, as investigated in this investigation, is to create classifying

expressions that strike an adjustment between effortlessness and viability. These
expressions ought to not be able to deal with complex issues given adequate information
but to imitate human reasoning adequately to supply experiences into the decision-
making handle. The ponder moreover recognizes that, like measurable approaches, ML
in hone accept operation without human intercession, emphasizing the mechanized
nature of the learning prepare.

In essence, this investigation looks for to contribute to the understanding of ML

strategies, their applications in classification, and their potential to imitate human
thinking. By looking at the advancing scene of ML methods, the think about points to
shed light on the subtleties of learning forms and their suggestions for creating
mechanized frameworks competent of making choices in a way that adjusts with human
cognitive forms.
Author name/s References (Jarrahi, M. H, Askay, D., Eshraghi, A, & Smith, P, 2023)
Purpose The reason for this consideration is to investigate the collaborative association between people and manufactured
insights (AI) in information administration (KM). It looks at the potential openings that AI frameworks offer in
upgrading KM hones, counting mechanization, information examination, and choice back. The ponder moreover
explores how AI can back information creation, capacity, recovery, and organization. It highlights AI-based
collaboration devices and stages for successful information sharing. Moreover, the think about centers on techniques
for coordination AI into KM hones while keeping up human inclusion and skill. The objective is to cultivate
collaboration, believe, and compelling communication between people and AI frameworks in KM exercises,
advancing increased insights.
Research Methodology This expository writing audit utilized an orderly approach to gather and assess existing investigation important to
our inquiry about questions. We conducted a comprehensive look utilizing databases, scholastic diaries, and sources,
utilizing carefully chosen watchwords and look strings. Papers were screened based on titles and abstracts utilizing
predefined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Information extraction centered on key components, counting consider
destinations, techniques, discoveries, and impediments, which were methodically organized. Basic examination was
utilized to evaluate consider quality and legitimacy. Through topical organization and comparison of considerations,
designs and investigation crevices were recognized. Appropriate quotation and moral contemplations were kept up
all through the survey handle.
Research 1- How can AI systems be effectively integrated into Knowledge Management (KM) practices to enhance
Questions/Hypotheses automation, data analysis, and decision support?
2- What role does AI play in facilitating information creation, storage, retrieval, and management within the
context of Knowledge Management, and how can this be optimized?
3- What strategies and tools can be employed to integrate AI into Knowledge Management practices, ensuring
effective collaboration between humans and AI systems while preserving human expertise and
involvement?
Independent variables Integration of AI Systems in Knowledge Management
Impact of AI-Based Collaboration Tools and Platforms
Level of Human Involvement and Expertise in AI-Augmented Knowledge Management
Dependent variables  Effectiveness of Knowledge Management Practices

Key Findings The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Knowledge Management (KM) holds transformative potential,
however basic holes endure. The effect of AI on KM workflows, counting data creation, capacity, recovery, and
application, requires in-depth investigation to streamline forms and address potential challenges. Organization of AI
in KM presents complexities, requesting inquire about for compelling administration, centering on information
security, protection, and moral contemplations. Organizational culture experiences noteworthy shifts with the
presentation of AI, affecting parts, aptitudes, and collaborative hones, encouraging encourage examination into
social suggestions. Client acknowledgment and belief in AI-powered KM frameworks are significant, requiring
investigate to comprehend components impacting acknowledgment and investigate trust-building components.
Tending to these holes illuminates procedures for ideal AI integration, opening the total potential of collaborative
organizations between people and AI in information administration endeavors.
Research Gap/ limitations Within the domain of knowledge management (KM), the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) presents
transformative potential. Be that as it may
However, in any case Be that as it may, a significant hole exists in comprehending AI's effect on KM workflows,
organization, and organizational culture. Bridging this crevice is basic for consistent AI integration, optimizing
workflows, tending to authoritative challenges, and cultivating a positive culture open to AI progressions in KM.

Value added This writing audit gives a comprehensive examination of the collaborative association between people and AI in
information administration, advertising bits of knowledge into the potential benefits and openings that AI
 Findings
1. Effect on KM Workflows: The presentation of AI in KM has the potential to reshape and optimize workflows. In any case, the impacts of AI on diverse stages of
the information administration handle, such as information creation, capacity, recovery, and application, require assist examination. Investigate is required to
investigate how AI advances can streamline these workflows, distinguish potential bottlenecks or challenges in their usage, and propose methodologies for
optimizing KM forms through AI integration.

2. Administration of AI in KM: The administration of AI frameworks in KM is another region that requires consideration. AI innovations present modern
complexities in overseeing and overseeing information resources inside organizations. Questions emerge with respect to information security, security, and moral
contemplations when AI is utilized to analyze and prepare delicate information. Assists inquire about is required to create systems and rules for viable administration
of AI in KM, tending to issues such as information possession, responsibility, straightforwardness, and compliance with directions.
3. Effect on Organizational Culture: The integration of AI into KM hones can have significant suggestions for organizational culture. The presentation of AI
frameworks may bring around changes within the parts and obligations of workers, requiring the improvement of unused ability sets and competencies. It is
imperative to get it how AI impacts the demeanors, recognitions, and behaviors of people inside the organization and how it impacts knowledge-sharing hones and
collaboration flow. Assist investigation is required to investigate the social suggestions of AI in KM and distinguish techniques for cultivating a strong and versatile
culture that grasps AI innovations.

4. Client Acknowledgment and Trust: Client acknowledgment and believe in AI frameworks are basic variables for their effective execution in KM. Inquire about is
required to get it the variables that impact client acknowledgment of AI advances, such as ease of use, seen convenience, and seen ease of utilize. Moreover,
exploring the variables that contribute to trust-building between human clients and AI frameworks in KM settings is fundamental. This incorporates investigating
issues of explain ability, unwavering quality, and the part of human-AI interaction in building believe and certainty in AI-powered KM frameworks.

Addressing these crevices within the writing will give profitable bits of knowledge for organizations looking to use AI in their KM activities. By understanding the
effect of AI on KM workflows, administration, and organizational culture, organizations can create viable techniques for joining AI advances, maximize their
potential benefits, and overcome potential challenges or boundaries to appropriation. Furthermore, inquiring about these regions can contribute to the advancement
of rules, systems, and best hones for the fruitful usage of AI in KM, cultivating a collaborative and advantageous association between people and AI frameworks.

Conclusion
In conclusion, this literature review has provided valuable insights into the collaborative partnership between humans and AI in knowledge
management. The review highlighted the significant opportunities that AI presents in enhancing knowledge management practices, including
automation, data analysis, and decision support. It became evident that AI technologies can facilitate knowledge creation, storage, retrieval, sharing,
and application, thereby improving overall knowledge management within organizations. The concept of augmented intelligence, emphasizing the
collaboration and synergy between humans and AI, emerged as a crucial aspect in harnessing the full potential of AI in knowledge management.
However, it is essential to address concerns related to job displacement, skill development, and ethical considerations to ensure a balanced integration
of AI systems. The review also identified gaps in the literature, such as the need for further research on the impact of AI on KM workflows,
governance, and organizational culture. Future research should focus on exploring practical approaches for fostering collaboration, trust, and effective
communication between humans and AI systems in knowledge management activities.

In addition to the main findings and contributions discussed in the previous section, it is important to acknowledge the implications and practical
implications of the research on the collaborative partnership between humans and AI in knowledge management. The insights gained from this
literature review can inform organizations and practitioners in leveraging AI technologies effectively for knowledge management. By understanding
the opportunities and challenges associated with the integration of AI systems, organizations can develop strategies to optimize knowledge creation,
storage, sharing, and application processes. Furthermore, the findings highlight the importance of fostering a collaborative and trust-based environment
between humans and AI systems to ensure successful implementation. This may involve providing training and upskilling opportunities for employees
to adapt to the changing landscape of knowledge management. Additionally, ethical considerations, such as data privacy and algorithmic bias, should
be carefully addressed to ensure responsible and ethical use of AI in knowledge management. Overall, this research contributes to the practical
understanding and implementation of collaborative human-AI partnerships in knowledge management, enabling organizations to harness the full
potential of AI while leveraging human expertise and judgment.

Recommendation and future Research

1. Embrace a human-centered approach: While AI technologies offer significant opportunities for enhancing KM practices, it is crucial to maintain a
human-centered approach. Recognize that AI is a tool to augment human capabilities and expertise, rather than replace them. Ensure that human
involvement, creativity, and critical thinking continue to play a central role in knowledge creation, sharing, and application processes.
2. Foster collaboration and trust: Promote a collaborative and inclusive organizational culture that encourages effective communication and
collaboration between humans and AI systems. Establish mechanisms for knowledge sharing and co-creation, facilitating interactions between
employees and AI technologies. Build trust in AI systems by ensuring transparency, explain ability, and accountability in their operation.

3. Provide training and skill development: Invest in training programs to enhance employees' digital literacy and AI-related skills. Equip them with the
knowledge and capabilities to effectively utilize AI systems for knowledge management. This includes training on data analysis, AI tools, and
understanding the ethical implications of AI in KM. Encourage continuous learning and create opportunities for employees to upskill and reskill in the
context of AI-enabled KM.

4- Conduct regular evaluations and feedback loops: Establish mechanisms for continuous evaluation and feedback to assess the effectiveness of AI
systems in KM. Regularly monitor and measure the impact of AI-enabled KM practices on key performance indicators, such as knowledge sharing,
decision-making processes, and organizational outcomes. Solicit feedback from employees and stakeholders to identify areas of improvement and
refine the AI systems accordingly.

5. Foster a learning culture: Cultivate a learning culture that embraces curiosity, adaptability, and openness to change. Encourage employees to explore
new AI technologies, stay updated on emerging trends, and share their knowledge and experiences with others. Create forums for cross-functional
collaboration, such as communities of practice or innovation labs, where employees can exchange ideas and co-create AI-driven solutions for KM
challenges.

To effectively coordinate AI into knowledge management (KM), a human-centered approach is foremost. Recognize AI as a device increasing human
capabilities, protecting the centrality of human association, inventiveness, and basic considering in information forms. Cultivate collaboration and
belief by advancing a comprehensive organizational culture that encourages viable communication and co-creation between people and AI. Build up
straightforwardness, explain ability, and responsibility in AI operation to construct belief. Contribute to workers preparing for computerized
proficiency and AI-related abilities, empowering ceaseless learning, and upskilling. Actualize normal assessments and input circles to survey AI's
effect on KM, refining frameworks based on worker and partner input. Develop a learning culture that grasps interest, versatility, and cross-functional
collaboration for imaginative AI-driven arrangements in KM.

Bibliography
Abubakar, A. M., Elrehail, H.,, Alatailat, M. A., & Elçi, A. (2019). Knowledge management, decision-making style and
organizational performance. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 104-114.
Adam, A.,, & Lindahl, G. (2017). Applying the dynamic capabilities framework in the case of a large public construction client.
420-431.
Ahmed, S, Fiaz, M.,, & Shoaib, M. (2015). Impact of knowledge management practices on organizational performance: an
empirical study of banking sector in Pakistan. FWU Journal of Social Sciences,, 147-167.
Al Mansoori, S, Salloum, S. A, & Shaalan, K. (2020). The impact of artificial intelligence and information technologies on the
efficiency of knowledge management at modern organizations: a systematic review. 163-182.
Alavi, M, & Tiwana, A. (2002). Knowledge integration in virtual teams: The potential role of KMS. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(12), 1029-1037.
Armbrecht Jr, F. R., Chapas, R. B., Chappelow, C. C, Farris, G. F., Friga, P. N, Hartz, C. A, & Whitwell, G. E. (2001).
Knowledge management in research and development. . 28-48.
Balakrishnan, J., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2021). Conversational commerce: entering the next stage of AI-powered digital assistants. .
1-35.
Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Sree Ramaswamy, P, DC, W., , & Chu, M. (2017). Artificial intelligence the next digital frontier.
Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? Journal of knowledge
management, 4(2), 87-98.
Chen, H. (n.d.). Machine learning for information retrieval: Neural networks, symbolic learning, and genetic algorithms. 194-
216.
Chuang, S. H. (2004). A resource-based perspective on knowledge management capability and competitive advantage: an
empirical investigation. 459-465.
Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of knowledge management, 101-115.
Davenport, T. H. (2018). The AI advantage: How to put the artificial intelligence revolution to work. mit Press.
Dimiduk, D. M., Holm, E. A.,, & Niezgoda, S. R. (2018). Perspectives on the impact of machine learning, deep learning, and
artificial intelligence on materials, processes, and structures engineering. 157-172.
Fernández, M, Cantador, I., López, V., Vallet, D, Castells, P, & Motta, E. (2011). Semantically enhanced information retrieval:
An ontology-based approach. . 434-452.
Holzinger, A, Stocker, C., Ofner, B., Prohaska, G, Brabenetz, A.,, & Hofmann-Wellenhof, R. . (2013). Combining HCI, natural
language processing, and knowledge discovery-potential of IBM content analytics as an assistive technology in the
biomedical field. 13-24.
Intezari, A.,, & Gressel, S. (2017). Information and reformation in KM systems: big data and strategic decision-making. Journal
of Knowledge Management,, 71-91.
Jain, S.,, & Jain, R. (2019). Role of artificial intelligence in higher education—An empirical investigation. 144-150.
Jain, S.,\, & Jain, R. (2019). Role of artificial intelligence in higher education—An empirical investigation.
K. Kakabadse, N.,, Kouzmin, A.,, & Kakabadse, A. (2001). From tacit knowledge to knowledge management: Leveraging
invisible assets. 137-154.
Mah, P. M., Skalna, I., & Muzam, J. (2022). Natural Language Processing and Artificial Intelligence for Enterprise Management
in the Era of Industry 4.0. .
Serenko, A, & Bontis, N. (2013). Investigating the current state and impact of the intellectual capital academic discipline. Journal
of Intellectual Capital, 476-500.
Shahzad, M., Qu, Y., Zafar, A. U, Rehman, S. U.,, & Islam, T. (2020). Exploring the influence of knowledge management
process on corporate sustainable performance through green innovation. Journal of Knowledge Management,, 2079-2106.
Sokoh, G. C., & Okolie, U. C. (2021). Knowledge management and its importance in modern organizations. ournal of Public
Administration, Finance and Law, 283-300.
Van Kerkhoff, L., & Lebel, L. (2006). Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. 45-477.
Wang, Z., Li, M., Lu, J., & Cheng, X. (2022). Business Innovation based on artificial intelligence and Blockchain technology.
Zhang, D, Zhou, L, & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2002). A knowledge management framework for the support of decision making in
humanitarian assistance/disaster relief. Knowledge and Information Systems, 370-385.

Agrawal, N. (2021, March 9). Artificial intelligence meets real friendship: College students are bonding with robots. LA Times.
Available at https://www.latimes.com/california/ story/2021-03-09/college-students-pour-out-emotions- amid-pandemic-to-bots
Agrawal, A., Gans, J., & Goldfarb, A. (2017). What to expect from artificial intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 58(3),
23e27.
Alavi, M., & Denford, J. (2011). Knowledge management: Pro- cess, practice, and Web 2.0. In M. Easterby-Smith, & M. A.
Lyles (Eds.), Handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 105e124). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and
research issues. MISQ, 25(1), 107e136.
Alavi, M., & Tiwana, A. (2003). Knowledge management: The information technology dimension. In M. Easterby-Smith, & M.
A. Lyles (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of organizational learning and knowledge management (pp. 104e121). Hoboken, NJ:
Blackwell Publishing.
Bersin, J., & Zao-Sanders, M. (2020, February 12). Boost your team’s data literacy. Harvard Business Review. Available at
https://hbr.org/2020/02/boost-your-teams-data-literacy
Bhatt, G. D. (2001). Knowledge management in organizations: Examining the interaction between technologies, tech- niques, and
people. Journal of KM, 5(1), 68e75.
Bhattacharya, P., Hiware, K., Rajgaria, S., Pochhi, N., Ghosh, K., & Ghosh, S. (2019). A comparative study of summarization
algorithms applied to legal case judgments. In Advances in information retrieval (pp. 413e428). Co- logne, Germany: ECIR.
Blumauer, A. (2019, December 30). Explainable AI: The rising role of knowledge scientists. Forbes. Available at https://
www.forbes.com/sites/forbestechcouncil/2019/12/30/ explainable-ai-the-rising-role-of-knowledge-scientists/ #428c9b8603f0
Brown, S., Davidovic, J., & Hasan, A. (2021). The algorithm audit: Scoring the algorithms that score us. Big Data and Society,
8(1). Available at https://doi.org/10.1177/ 2053951720983865
Brynjolfsson, E., & McAfee, A. (2017, July 18). The business of artificial intelligence. Harvard Business Review. Available at
https://hbr.org/2017/07/the-business-of-artificial- intelligence
Brynjolfsson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2017). What can machine learning do? Workforce implications. Science, 358(6370),
1530e1534.
Brynjolfsson, E., Rock, D., & Syverson, C. (2017). Artificial in- telligence and the modern productivity paradox: A clash of
expectations and statistics [Working Paper No. 24001]. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=be3d0c3144fe3e3b81a496ccd20276ec8f6f0518
Harun, M. H. (2002). Integrating e-learning into the workplace. The Internet and Higher Education, 4, 301–310
Heijst, G., Spek, R., & Kruizinga, E. (1997). Corporate memories as a tool for knowledge management. Expert Systems With
Applications, 13(1), 41–54
Hendriks, P. H. J., & Vriens, D. J. (1999). Knowledge-based systems and knowledge management: friends or foes? Information
and Management, 35, 113–125.
Hertzum, M. (2002). The importance of trust in software engineers assessment and choice if information sources. Information
and Organization, 12, 1–18.
Hicks, B. J., Culley, S. J., Allen, R. D., & Mullineux, G. (2002). A framework for the requirements of capturing, storing and
reusing information and knowledge in engineering design. International Journal of Information Management, 22, 263–280
Hinton, C. M. (2002). Towards a pattern language for information-centered business change. International Journal of Information
Management, 22, 325–341.
Hooper, R. S., Galvin, T. P., Kilmer, R. A., & Liebowitz, J. (1998). Use of an expert system in a personnel selection process.
Expert Systems With Application, 14, 425–432.\

Senge, P. M. (2006). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Random House.

Leonard, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. Harvard Business School
Press.

Davenport, T. H. (1997). Information ecology: Mastering the information and knowledge environment. Oxford University Press.

Ensoussan, E., Soltani, E., & Gumbus, A. (2013). Sustainable knowledge management: A strategic imperative for firms in the
21st century. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(6), 829-844.
Adams, G.L., Lamont, B.T. (2003), "Knowledge management systems and developing sustainable competitive advantage",
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 7 No.2, pp.142-54.

Baddi, A., Sharif, A. (2003), "Information management and knowledge integration for enterprise innovation", Logistics
Information Management, Vol. 16 No.2, pp.145-55.

Cardinal, L.B., Allessandri, T.M., Turner, S.F. (2001), "Knowledge codifiability, resources, and science based innovation",
Journal of Knowledge Management, Vol. 5 No.2, pp.195-204.

Cavusgil, S.T., Calantone, R.J., Zhao, Y. (2003), "Tacit knowledge transfer and firm innovation capability", Journal of Business
& Industrial Marketing, Vol. 18 No.1, pp.6-21.

Chen, J., Zhaohui, Z., Xie, H.Y. (2004), "Measuring intellectual capital", Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5 No.1, pp.195-212.

Darroch, J., McNaughton, R. (2002), "Examining the link between knowledge management practices and types of innovation",
Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 3 No.3, pp.210-22

Du Plessis, M., Boon, J.A. (2004), "The role of knowledge management in eBusiness and customer relationship management:
South African case study findings", International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 24 No.1, pp.73- 86.

Gloet, M., Terziovski, M. (2004), "Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation
performance", Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 15 No.5, pp.402-9.

Rodan, S. (2002), "Innovation and heterogeneous knowledge in managerial contact networks", Journal of Knowledge
Management, Vol. 6 No.2, pp.152-63.

Cummings, J. N., & Teng, B. S. (2003). Transferring R&D knowledge: The key factors affecting knowledge transfer success.
Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 20(1-2), 39-68
Davenport, T. H., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge: How Organizations Manage What They Know. Harvard Business
Press.

Alberto Carneiro, (2000),"How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness?", Journal of Knowledge
Management, Vol. 4 Iss: 2 pp. 87 - 98

Paschen, J., Kietzmann, J., & Kietzmann, T. C. (2019). Artificial intelligence (AI) and its implications for market knowledge in
B2B marketing. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 34(7), 1410–1419. doi:10.1108/jbim-10-2018-0295