Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sinusoidal Oscillation
1
9/14/2013
The Frequency
F = The Frequency
of the wave, = 1/T
The frequency is
the number of
cycles that occur in
one second, and is
simply the
reciprocal of the
period
2
9/14/2013
Mechanical Structures
In analyzing the vibration of a machine, Energy always
moves, or flows, from the source of the vibration to
the energy absorber where it is converted into heat.
The most important absorber of energy in a machine
is friction,
On the other hand, a machine with greater inherent
friction will have lower vibration levels because the
energy is absorbed quickly
For example, a machine with rolling element bearings (often called anti-friction
bearings), generally vibrates more than a machine with sleeve bearings, where the oil
film acts as a significant absorber of energy.
The reason that airplane structures are riveted together rather than being welded into a
solid unit is that the riveted joints move slightly, absorbing energy by sliding friction.
This keeps vibrations from building up to destructive levels. Such a structure is said to
be highly damped, and the damping is actually a measure of its energy absorption
capability
Natural Frequencies
• Any physical structure can be modeled as a number
of springs, masses, and dampers. Dampers absorb
energy, but springs and masses do not.
• The natural frequency of an undamped spring-mass
system is given by the following equation:
3
9/14/2013
Resonance
• Resonance is an
operating condition
where an excitation
frequency is near a
natural frequency
of the machine
structure.
4
9/14/2013
5
9/14/2013
Time Domain
Frequency-Domain
Fourier transform
11
Vibration analysis,
It has been shown many times over that the vibration signature of an
operating machine provides far more information about the inner workings of
the machine than any other type of non-destructive test. A bearing that has a
small developing defect will cause a telltale change in the machine vibration,
as will an imbalance condition, a misalignment, or any of a myriad of other
faults
properly applied, allows the technician to detect small developing mechanical
defects long before they become a threat to the integrity of the machine, and
thus provides the necessary lead-time to schedule maintenance to suit the
needs of the plant management. In this way, plant management has control
over the machines, rather than the other way around.
6
9/14/2013
VIBRATION SOURCES
13
The orientation
7
9/14/2013
TRENDING ANALYSIS
Trend data are plotted versus
time and provide historical
trends,
not confused with time-
domain plots, which are
instantaneous measures of
total vibration amplitude
plotted against time
measured in seconds.
15
8
9/14/2013
Misalignment
couplings or large in axial direction 50% 1x RPM usual 2 & best found by appearance of large axial
single double or triple
bearings and bent or more of radial vibration 3xRPM sometimes vibration. Use dial indicators
shaft
Bearing responsible most likely the one
Bad bearing anti- Unsteady - use velocity very high several
Erratic nearest point of largest high frequency
frication type measure if possible times RPM
vibration
if an gear largest vibration in line with gear
centers. If an motor or generator vibration
Eccentric journals usually not large 1x RPM single mark
disappears when power turn off. If an pump or
blower attempt to balance.
Bad gears or gear low use velocity measure if very high gear teeth
Erratic
noise possible times RPM
Mechanical two reference marks usually accompanied by unbalance and / or
2 x RPM
looseness slightly erratic misalignment
1xRPM or 1or 2x
disappear when power single or rotating double if vibration amplitude drops off instantly when
Electrical synchronous
turned off mark. power is turned off
frequency
1xRPM or number of
Aerodynamic Rare as a cause of trouble except in cases of
blades on fan or
hydraulic forces resonance.
impeller xRPM
Frequency in terms
Most likely causes Other possible causes & remarks
of RPM
1-eccentric journals, gears or pulleys
2- misalignment or bend shaft- if high axial vibration
3- bad belts if RPM of Belt
1 x RPM Unbalance
4- Resonance
5- reciprocating forces
6- electrical problems
1- misalignment if high axial vibration
2- reciprocating forces
2 x RPM Mechanical looseness
3- Resonance
4- bad belts if 2 x RPM of Belt
usually a combination of misalignment and
3 x RPM Misalignment
excessive axial clearances ( looseness)
1- bad drive belt
Oil whirl ( less than 1/2 2- background vibration
Less than 1 x RPM
RPM) 3- sub-harmonic resonance
4- "beat" vibration
Common electrical problems include broken rotor
Synchronous ( A.C line
Electrical problems bars, eccentric rotor, unbalance phase in poly -
frequency )
phase system, unequal air gap.
2 x synch. Frequency Torque pulses Rare as a problem unless resonance is excited
1- bearing vibration may be unsteady - amplitude
Bad gears and frequency
Many times RPM ( Aerodynamic forces 2- Cavitation, recirculation and flow turbulence
harmonically related Hydraulic forces cause random, high frequency vibration
frequency) Mechanical looseness 3- improper lubrication of journal bearings ( frication
18
Reciprocating forces excited vibration )
4- Rubbing
9
9/14/2013
Machine history
10
9/14/2013
WaterFall Diagram
Plots such. as this are sometimes
referred to as "waterfall" diagrams.
The occurrence of an oil whirl
condition during startup is clearly
shown in Figure as are the
resonant/critical speeds excited by
rotor unbalance.
11
9/14/2013
Figure 108 shows the vibration and noise analysis data taken
from a direct-drive 1750 RPM fan. From the data, there
appears to be little correlation between the initial vibration
and noise frequencies: the initial vibration is most
predominant (.59 in/sec) at 1 x RPM due to fan unbalance,
whereas the noise frequencies of significance are 2 x RPM, 4
x RPM, 6 x RPM and 10 x RPM. However,
The follow-up noise analysis reveals that balancing did, in
fact, reduce the noise amplitudes at frequencies of 1 xRPM, 2
x RPM, 6 x RPM and 10 x RPM. However, the noise at 4 x
RPM was unaffected. The result of balancing was a reduction
of noise from an initial 82 dBC and 76 dBA to 80 dBC and 72
dBA. Or, a 2 dBC and a 4 dBA reduction.
12
9/14/2013
Figure 109 illustrates another example of machinery noise and vibration analysis
data. This data was taken on a speed reducer gear drive with 1750 RPM input
from a 4-pole induction motor The vibration analysis clearly shows excessive
vibration (.7 in/see) at a frequency equal to 1 x RPM of the motor;.
however, the axial vibration at this frequency was equally high, indicating
that misalignment between the motor and gear box was the problem and
not unbalance. The initial noise analysis data revealed very little noise at
the 1 x RPM frequency
but did reveal high amplitude noise at a frequency of approximately
160,000 CPM, corresponding to gear meshing frequency (i.e., 1750 RPM
x 90 teeth = 157,500 CPM).
Realignment of the gear box and motor was performed, reducing the
vibration from .7 in/see (18rom/sec) to .1 in/see (2.5 rom/see). After
realignment, a follow-up noise analysis disclosed a substantial reduction
of the noise at gear meshing frequency with an overall reduction
of 92 dBC and 92 dBA initially to 75 dBC and 73 dBA after alignment
13
9/14/2013
CENTRIFUGAL PUMPS
In addition to the problems of unbalance,
misalignment, defective bearings and
resonance, centrifugal pumps have some
unique problems which deserve discussion.
These include
1. Hydraulic forces.
2.Cavitation.
3. Recirculation
Hydraulic forces
• Normal vibration will generally occur at a
frequency which is equal to the number of
vanes on the impeller multiplied by shaft
RPM (pressure pulsation )
• the hydraulic pulsations will be balanced
and the amplitudes of vibration from
inherent hydraulic forces will be minimal
14
9/14/2013
Centrifugal pump
Excessive hydraulic forces (problem)
1-3600 RPM centrifugal pump, with six impeller, which had an unusually high
amplitude of vibration at a frequency of 21,600 CPM.
2- 3600 * 6 = 21600, indicating that hydraulic forces were responsible
3-It was felt that this predominant vibration was responsible for premature failure
of bearings
the usual tests for resonance were carried out with no natural frequencies found
,
corresponding to the objectionable 21,600 CPM vibration frequency.
As a result, the pump was disassembled for inspection and it was discovered that
the radial clearances between the impeller and diffusers cast in the pump housing
diametrically opposite one another differed by approximately .4 inches (10 mm).
Apparently, this was creating an unbalance of hydraulic forces.
The condition was corrected by machining both diffusers to equalize radial
clearances and diffuser profile. The result was a substantial reduction in vibration
centrifugal pump
This inspection revealed that the first stage impeller wear ring had
seized to the shaft. Replacing the wear ring virtually eliminated the
vibration at the frequency of 6 x RPM.
15
9/14/2013
Centrifugal pump
Excessive hydraulic forces (problem)
inspection disclosed that three out of the four welds which secured the second
stage diffuser to the channel ring had broken free
Apparently, this allowed the diffuser to shift slightly relative to the impeller
resulting in an increase in hydraulic forces
16
9/14/2013
Cavitation
A distinctive
noise often
accompanies
cavitation. Mild
cavitation may
have the sound
of sand being
pumped
whereas a more
severe cavitation
may sound as
though gravel
was being
passed through
the pump. In
cases of
extremely severe
cavitation, it
may sound as
though rocks are
being passed
through the
pump
17
9/14/2013
CAVITATION
Since the pump is "starved", the fluid coming into the pump will literally be
pulled apart in an attempt to fill the void which exists. This creates pockets or
cavities of nearly perfect vacuum which are highly unstable and collapse or
implode very quickly. Due to their imperative nature, these implosions serve
to excite the local natural frequencies of the pump housing, impeller and
other related pump parts
implosions may occur at random intervals at various locations within the
pump or piping, the resulting vibration will be random in amplitude and
frequency.
Thus, the vibration caused by cavitation in a pump may cover a rather
broad frequency range where individual amplitudes and frequencies are
constantly changing
The distinct spikes at 3600 and 7200 CPM represent steady state vibration
at 1 and 2 x pump RPM, possibly due to some unbalance or misalignment.
However, the vibration occurring between 30,000 CPM and 100,000 CPM is
random with no steady state amplitude and frequency characteristics.
a pump which had been subjected to minor cavitation had progressively
shown a decrease in operating efficiency. When the pump was disassembled
for visual inspection, it was found that the hub was all that remained of the
pump impeller. The impeller vanes had been completely eroded away by
cavitation
18
9/14/2013
RE-CIRCULATION
19