Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rambonga, Jorella
Sison, Angeline
Student
Villarico, Ma. Andrea
CEC32S1
Constraints
Quantitative Constraint
1
that the preferable alternative is the trade-off that
may provide a shorter duration for the project.
Furthermore, the duration of the project will
influence the economic cost, particularly with the
overhead aspects of the project.
Qualitative Constraints
2
and health management plan. It is designed to
address potential hazards and prioritize the
well-being of both workers and the public during
the construction process.
Trade-offs
Traffic Light Signal Optimization Traffic Light Signal Optimization helps improve
traffic flow and reduce congestion. However,
prioritizing green time for vehicles may result in
increased vehicle speeds, compromising
pedestrian safety as it lessens pedestrian crossing
times.
3
Design Standards
National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015 The National Building Codes of the Philippines
(NSCP 2015) 2015 is the structural code used in the country that
uses prescriptive and performance-based
provisions that provides minimum requirements for
the design and construction of structural systems.
It is founded on wide-ranged principles that
enables the utilization of new and innovative
materials and building design. Additionally, it uses
different models of codes or regulation to address
the needs and protect public health, safety and
welfare.
National Building Code of the Philippines (NBCP) Also known as Presidential Decree No. 1096, it is a
government policy on the codes and standards
which covers technical requirements in
construction or renovations of buildings and
structures in the Philippines to ensure the life,
health, property, welfare, and functionality of the
building as well as the users. It was formulated and
adopted from the uniform building code to instill
updated and modern technical knowledge on the
design of buildings as well as its construction, use,
functionality, occupancy, and its maintenance.
Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory The Memorandum Circular Number 2017-030
Board Guidelines (LTFRB Guidelines) where the Department of Transportation (DOTr)
issued Department Order No. 011, series of 2017,
otherwise known as the Omnibus Guidelines on
the Planning and Identification of Public Road
Transportation Services and Franchise Issuance or
Omnibus Franchising Guidelines, which aims to
provide a reliable, safe, adequate, accessible,
environment-friendly, dependable, efficient, and
comfortable public road transportation throughout
the country.
4
locally sourced structural steel products. These
structural steel products are separated into five
categories according to their manufacturing
process and/or maximum section thickness. The
designers used the ASEP Steel Handbook for
reference of the steel properties and sections for
the design of Structural Steel SMRF and Structural
Steel SMRF with Diagonal Bracing.
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC) AISC is a technical institute non-stock non-profit
trade association established in 1921 to provide for
the community of structural steel design as well as
industry of construction in the US. This represents
the empirical experiences, the judgements, total
experiences, and strength of the entire steel
industry including fabricators, producers, and steel
distributors. The designers used AISC for sourcing
out steel sections and its steel properties alongside
with the ASEP Steel Handbook.
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE),
is a professional organization for civil engineers
that was established in 1852. It also serves as a
significant source of technical and professional civil
engineering seminars, training courses,
publications, and other educational material. The
ASCE is widely recognized as an authorized group
for the publication of numerous regulations and
standards outlining optimal building practices for
the general public's protection. The ASCE methods
and procedures for calculating wind loads are used
by the designers as a reference for the design of
each trade-offs stated.
5
PROPOSED DESIGN OF URDANETA-NANCALOBASAAN ELEVATED RAILWAY ALONG EASTERN URDANETA
TO BINALONAN BORDER IN McARTHUR HIGHWAY, URDANETA CITY, PANGASINAN
A Final Project
Presented to the Faculty of the Civil Engineering Department
Technological Institute of the Philippines
Quezon City
by
Rambonga, Jorella
Sison, Angeline
Villarico, Ma. Andrea
Submitted to:
Engr. Brylle Jerald Timbal
Course Instructor
6
TABLE OF CONTENTS
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................... 8
1.1 The Project............................................................................................................................................8
1.2 The Project Location........................................................................................................................... 14
1.3 The Client............................................................................................................................................15
CHAPTER 2 - CONSTRAINTS, TRADE-OFFS, AND DESIGN STANDARDS.............................................16
2.1 Design Constraints..............................................................................................................................16
2.1.1 Quantitative Constraint.................................................................................................................16
2.1.1.1 Economic Constraint............................................................................................................. 16
2.1.1.2 Constructability Constraint.................................................................................................... 16
2.1.1.3 Sustainability Constraints..................................................................................................... 16
2.1.1.4 Risk-Assessment Constraint................................................................................................. 16
2.1.2 Qualitative Constraint...................................................................................................................17
2.1.2.1 Environmental Constraint......................................................................................................17
2.1.2.2 Social Constraint................................................................................................................... 17
2.2 Design Trade-Offs............................................................................................................................... 17
2.2.1 Reinforced Concrete SMRF......................................................................................................... 17
2.2.2 Structural Steel SMRF..................................................................................................................18
2.2.3 Structural Steel SMRF with Diagonal Bracing..............................................................................19
2.2.4 Fiber Reinforced Concrete........................................................................................................... 20
2.3 Design Standards................................................................................................................................21
2.3.1 National Structural Code of the Philippines 2015.........................................................................21
2.3.2 National Building Code of the Philippines.................................................................................... 22
2.5.3 Land Transportation Franchising and Regulatory Board Guidelines (LTFRB Guidelines)........... 22
2.5.4 ASEP Steel Handbook................................................................................................................. 22
2.5.5 American Institute of Steel Construction...................................................................................... 23
2.5.6 American Society of Civil Engineers............................................................................................ 23
REFERENCES..............................................................................................................................................24
7
CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION
Through the provision of an alternate means of transportation, this project will help reduce traffic on city
streets and highways in Urdaneta, Pangasinan. It reduces the environmental impact and expenses
associated with land acquisition because elevated trains frequently require less space and can lessen the
need for forest clearing and land clearing. The chance of a vehicle-train collision at a grade crossing is
eliminated, making this project generally safer. The primary objective of the designers on the public
transportation terminal development is to achieve a fast and convenient transport for the general public.
Also, to provide a railway that will allow people to travel from Eastern Urdaneta- Binalonan and vice versa,
in its most efficient and effective way, to improve accessibility of the commuters around the area, to reduce
road traffic congestion, to instigate construction of a 2-route, elevated railway in Urdaneta, to identify and
prioritize the railway system infrastructure, and to develop a feasible, optimal engineering design for the
railway in the next years in the City of Urdaneta. Furthermore, the terminal is intended to promote the use
of public transit, which should improve its urban environment in the central capital area.