19 Elsieskraal Green Belt Design Framework - September 2015 - Final With Appendices

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc
CK 2011/037636/23
e info@gibbssaintpol.co.za
t +27(0) 21 447 8160 | f +27(0) 86 610 8350
402 Salt Circle, 19 Kent Road, Salt River, 7925
www.gibbssaintpol.co.za
ELSIESKRAAL GREEN BELT

Design Framework
(Source: gibbs saintpol)
DRAFT DESIGN
FRAMEWORK DOCUMENT
September 2015
VIA Report prepared by gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc
for the Greater Tygerberg Partnership
gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

DESIGN FRAMEWORK: Elsieskraal Green Belt
CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................. 7
1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................... 9
1.1 Elsieskraal River Green Belt ............................................................................ 9
2. METHODOLOGY ..................................................................................11
2.1 Stage 1 .................................................................................................... 11
2.2 Stage 2 .................................................................................................... 12
2.3 Stage 3 .................................................................................................... 12
3. SUB-REGIONAL ANALYSIS ......................................................................13

3.1 Hydrology ................................................................................................. 13
3.2 Integrated Drainage System ........................................................................... 13
3.3 Climate .................................................................................................... 17
3.4 Geology and Landscape Character ................................................................... 18
3.5 Natural Vegetation ...................................................................................... 19
3.6 Biodiversity Network ................................................................................... 20
3.7 Open Space Networks .................................................................................. 21
3.8 Integrated Biodiversity and Open Space Networks ................................................ 22
4. LOCAL ANALYSIS.................................................................................23
4.1 Green Spaces ............................................................................................. 23
4.2 Hydrology and Climate ................................................................................. 24
4.3 Movement Framework .................................................................................. 26
4.4 Activity Nodes and Major Vistas ...................................................................... 27
4.5 Zoning ..................................................................................................... 28
4.6 Building Use .............................................................................................. 29
4.7 Key Public Buildings .................................................................................... 30
4.8 Building Heights ......................................................................................... 31
4.9 Socio-economic Conditions ............................................................................ 33
4.10 Property Value Analysis ................................................................................ 33
5. SITE ANALYSIS ...................................................................................35

5.1 Existing Infrastructure .................................................................................. 35
5.2 Existing Trees ............................................................................................ 36
5.3 Elevation .................................................................................................. 37
5.4 Topography and Slope Analysis ....................................................................... 38
5.5 Sections ................................................................................................... 39
5.6 Micro-climate and Shadow Analysis .................................................................. 40

5.7 Urban Systems ........................................................................................... 41

5.8 Safety and Visibility..................................................................................... 42
5.9 Heritage ................................................................................................... 43
5.10 Photography .............................................................................................. 44
6. INFORMANTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS .......................................46

6.1 Informants Diagram ..................................................................................... 46
6.2 Opportunities and Constraints ........................................................................ 46
7. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT .................................................................48
8. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK DESIGN ..........................................................50

8.1 Landscape Structuring Diagram ....................................................................... 50
8.2 Landscape Zoning Diagram ............................................................................ 51
8.3 Landscape Programming Diagram .................................................................... 54
8.4 Precedent ................................................................................................. 56
8.5 Proposed Conceptual Design Framework............................................................ 58
8.6 Projects for Implementation .......................................................................... 60
8.6.1 Structuring and Linkages................................................................................................................. 60
8.6.2 Outdoor Market Space ................................................................................................................... 61
8.6.3 Cultivation ....................................................................................................................................... 62
8.6.4 Outdoor Fitness Activities ............................................................................................................... 63
8.6.5 Natural ............................................................................................................................................ 64
8.6.6 Leisure............................................................................................................................................. 65
8.7 Strategic Design Intervention ......................................................................... 66
9. Project implementation plan .................................................................70

9.1 Partnership Programme Initiative .................................................................... 70
9.2 Recommendations ....................................................................................... 71
10. CONTRIBUTORS ...............................................................................72
11. REFERENCES ...................................................................................73
12. Appendices ....................................................................................74

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Proposed strategic design intervention ............................................................... 8
Figure 1.1: Elsieskraal River Green Belt Locality Map ........................................................ 10
Figure 3.1: Salt catchment and the site ......................................................................... 14
Figure 3.2: Salt River catchment hydrology .................................................................... 15
Figure 3.3: Integrated drainage system ......................................................................... 16
Figure 3.4: Sub-regional climate ................................................................................. 17
Figure 3.5: Geology and landscape character .................................................................. 18
Figure 3.6: Natural Vegetation .................................................................................... 19
Figure 3.7: CoCT biodiversity network .......................................................................... 20
Figure 3.8: CoCT open space network ........................................................................... 21
Figure 3.9: Integrated biodiversity and open space network ................................................ 22
Figure 4.1: Green open space network .......................................................................... 23
Figure 4.2: Hydrology and climate ............................................................................... 25
Figure 4.3: Movement framework ................................................................................ 26
Figure 4.4: Activity nodes and major vistas .................................................................... 27
Figure 4.5: Zoning ................................................................................................... 28
Figure 4.6: Building use ............................................................................................ 29
Figure 4.7: Key public buildings and facilities ................................................................. 30
Figure 4.8: Building heights ....................................................................................... 31
Figure 4.9: Local area density and building heights .......................................................... 32
Figure 4.10: Property values within the Voortrekker Road Corridor Integration Zone .................. 34
Figure 5.1: Existing infrastructure ............................................................................... 35
Figure 5.2: Existing trees .......................................................................................... 36
Figure 5.3: Elevation ................................................................................................ 37
Figure 5.4: Slope analysis .......................................................................................... 38
Figure 5.5: Existing cross sections through the site ........................................................... 39
Figure 5.6: Microclimate and shadow analysis ................................................................. 40
Figure 5.7: Urban systems ......................................................................................... 41
Figure 5.8: Safety and visibility ................................................................................... 42
Figure 5.9: Heritage resources .................................................................................... 43
Figure 5.10: Northern portion of the project area to the south of Langenhoven Street ............... 45
Figure 5.11: Bridge structure at the intersection between Bloem and Wilge Streets................... 45
Figure 5.12: Portion of the project area to the north of Davies Avenue .................................. 45
Figure 5.13: Portion of the project area north of Voortrekker Road ....................................... 45
Figure 6.1: Informants diagram: opportunities and constraints............................................. 47
Figure 7.1: Photographs from the public meeting held on 15 June 2015.................................. 48

Figure 8.1: Landscape Structuring Diagram..................................................................... 52

Figure 8.2: Landscape Zoning Diagram .......................................................................... 53
Figure 8.3: Landscape Zoning Diagram .......................................................................... 55
Figure 8.4: Boneyard Creek, Urbana, Illinois ................................................................... 56
Figure 8.5: Sawmill River, Yonkers, New York ................................................................. 57
Figure 8.6: Houtan Park, Shanghai ............................................................................... 57
Figure 8.7: Proposed conceptual design framework .......................................................... 59
Figure 8.8: Structuring and linkages ............................................................................. 60
Figure 8.9: Outdoor market space ............................................................................... 61
Figure 8.10: Cultivation ............................................................................................ 62
Figure 8.11: Outdoor fitness activities .......................................................................... 63
Figure 8.12: Natural ................................................................................................ 64
Figure 8.13: Leisure ................................................................................................. 65
Figure 8.14: Proposed strategic design intervention .......................................................... 67
Figure 8.15: Proposed strategic design intervention – lighting plan ....................................... 68
Figure 8.16: Strategic design intervention conceptualization ............................................... 69

DESIGN FRAMEWORK: Elsieskraal Green Belt P a g e |6
ABBREVIATIONS
CBD Central Business District
CoCT City of Cape Town
MES Mould Empower Serve
GTP Greater Tygerberg Partnership
VOC Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie
VRCID Voortrekker Road Corridor Improvement District

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Greater Tygerberg Partnership (GTP) has identified the Elsieskraal Green Belt (the
site) as a strategic space which can be upgraded to contribute to the regeneration of the
Bellville Central Business District (CBD). Gibbs Saint Pôl Landscape Architects cc (Gibbs
Saint Pôl) was appointed by the GTP to develop a conceptual design framework and
strategic design intervention for the site.
A status quo analysis was undertaken at a sub-regional, local and site specific scale to gain
a better understanding of the current natural and urban conditions of the site and
surrounding areas. Factors such as hydrology, climate, geology, landscape character,
biodiversity, green spaces, microclimates, topography, movement routes, zoning, building
use, building heights, public amenities, socio-economic conditions, safety and visibility
and heritage resources were taken into consideration.
Essential components of the analysis were combined into an informants diagram which was
presented to stakeholders to assist with the formulation and identification of potential
opportunities and constraints as well as a vision for the proposed project. A conceptual
design framework and a design proposal for a strategic design intervention were
developed, taking stakeholder input into consideration.
Conceptual Design Framework
The conceptual design framework intends to present a strategic vision for the project area
that can be implemented over time. It has been formulated based on the integration of
three conceptual components: Structuring, Zoning and Programming.
The conceptual design framework can be divided into various elements or components to
allow for implementation over an extended time period, as the need arises and funding
becomes available. The conceptual design framework is intended as an overall vision for
the project area, indicating what could potentially be possible over time. The intention
would be to provide a range of activities to draw people into the space, thereby creating a
lively, active and safe environment.
It is important to note that funding may not be available for the implementation of all the
activities that are suggested. In addition, certain activities that are suggested may not be
feasible at the time of implementation, or could be accommodated in areas adjacent to
the site such as Elizabeth Park and the Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park. The most important
elements of the conceptual design framework have therefore been distilled into the
strategic design intervention, which has been identified as the most important, primary
design intervention required to activate the space.
Strategic Design Intervention
The strategic design intervention is illustrated in Figure 1, and can be divided into linkages
and structural elements. Linkages allow for movement throughout the space and provide
structure and cohesion to the design, while structural elements re-inforce these linkages.
Linkages are centered on the linear linkage of the River system and include primary,
secondary and tertiary pedestrian and cycling routes.
Structural elements which re-inforce these linkages include lighting, seating, trees and
sculptural features. These elements have been strategically placed to reinforce the
structural design of the strategic design intervention. The aim is to create structural
cohesion throughout the design framework and to allow for a variety of uses to occur
within the spaces that are created in between the structural components. The River
system is the most important structural linkage in the design, on which all the linkages
within the framework are centered.
The Report concludes with a number of recommendations which would facilitate the
future development and implementation of the strategic design intervention.

Figure 1: Proposed strategic design intervention

1. INTRODUCTION
The Greater Tygerberg Partnership (GTP) aims to facilitate accessible and safe public
spaces that are valued as vital community assets and serve social and recreational needs
while enhancing the urban environment. The GTP has identified the Elsieskraal Green Belt
(the site) as a strategic space which can be upgraded to contribute to the regeneration of
the Bellville Central Business District (CBD). Gibbs Saint Pôl Landscape Architects cc (Gibbs
Saint Pôl) were appointed by the GTP to develop a conceptual design framework for the
Elsieskraal River Green Belt and a proposal for a catalytic strategic design intervention
within the Elsieskraal River system (the project).
This document provides an analysis of the broader natural and urban environment and site
specific characteristics of the Elsieskraal Green Belt to identify design informants for the
development of the conceptual design framework. It provides a description of the
stakeholder engagement process that was undertaken as part of the project, and
concludes with a conceptual design proposal for a strategic design intervention that could
facilitate the revitalization of the site.
1.1 Elsieskraal River Green Belt

The urban systems in Bellville are centered on a network of green spaces that play a key
role in linking the watercourses of the Tygerberg Hills with those of the Peninsula
Mountain Chain. There are a number of north-south systems running parallel to the green
space networks, including transport systems, economic nodes and educational facilities.
The Elsieskraal Green Belt forms a subcomponent of this well-functioning urban system
and comprises a 470m canalized section of the Elsieskraal River located along the western
side of Durban Road, Bellville. The site is situated adjacent to DF Malan High School,
between Langenhoven Street (to the north) and Voortrekker Road (to the south) (see
Figure 1.1).
The site is currently underutilized due to safety concerns and there is great potential to
improve its desirability. Sections of the River have been disconnected by road crossings
and the green open space network has become fragmented. The topography of the system
also presents a challenge in that large portions of the site are below street level, thereby
reducing visibility, surveillance and consequently the safety of the area.
It is envisioned that the improvement and re-design of the Elsieskraal Green Belt will
increase recreational opportunities, boost aesthetic appeal and reinforce connectivity
between adjacent parks along the Elsieskraal River such as Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park (to
the north) and Elizabeth Park (to the south). Reconnecting the open spaces in this belt will
aim to facilitate the integration of natural systems with the surrounding urban
environment. It will aim to connect the currently fragmented green spaces linking the
Elsieskraal River to ensure that the ecological condition of the fragmented portions of the
riparian corridor is improved.
Upgrading the Elsieskraal River Green Belt has the potential to make the inner-city
neighbourhoods more liveable and to offer recreational opportunities for at-risk youth,
low-income children, and low income families. It also has the potential to provide space in
which people from low-income and high-income neighbourhoods can share experiences
and build a sense of community, giving visitors and residents an opportunity to experience
nature in an urban environment. This type of integrated reinjection of life into the area
can revitalize the economy, catalyse investment and improve the aesthetics of the area. It
is envisioned that the improved environmental and experiential character of the river
corridor would attract investment to the area and surrounding properties.

DESIGN FRAMEWORK: Elsieskraal Green Belt P a g e | 10
Figure 1.1: Elsieskraal River Green Belt Locality Map

2. METHODOLOGY
2.1 Stage 1
The project was undertaken in a number of stages. Stage 1 involved a status quo analysis
to gain a better understanding of the current natural and urban conditions of the area.
The analysis was undertaken at sub-regional, local and site specific scales to identify
informants for the development of the conceptual design framework.
Aspects that were analyzed at the sub-regional (catchment level) scale (see Section 3)
include:
 Hydrology;
 Climate;
 Geology and landscape character;
 Integrated drainage system;
 Natural vegetation;
 Biodiversity network; and
 Open space network;
Aspects that were analyzed at the local scale include (see Section 4):
 Green spaces;
 Hydrology and climate;
 Microclimate;
 Zoning and building use
 Building heights;
 Public amenities;
 Movement framework;
 Activity nodes and major vistas;
 Property analysis; and
 Socio-economic conditions.
Aspects that were analysed at the site specific scale include (see Section 5):
 Existing infrastructure;
 Micro climate and shadow analysis;
 Existing trees;
 Elevation;
 Topography;
 Urban Systems;
 Safety and visibility; and
 Heritage resources;
Specialist studies were completed by Dr Liz Day (hydrology) and Mike Scurr and Janine de
Waal (heritage) to inform the analysis of specific aspects (see Sections 3.1, 4.2 and 5.9).

2.2 Stage 2
Stage 2 of the project involved stakeholder engagement to identify potential challenges,
constraints and possible uses, functions and roles of the Elsieskraal Green Belt. The
stakeholder engagement process that was undertaken is discussed in more detail in
Section 7.
An initial meeting was held with the City Parks Department to present the preliminary
findings of the status quo analysis and to discuss various aspects relating to the project
and its potential implementation in early June 2015.
An initial public meeting and design charrette was held with members of the public on 17
June 2015. The purpose of the public meeting was to identify opportunities, constraints
and develop a communal vision for the site based on the identified design informants in
collaboration with the community. The findings of the status quo analysis and preliminary
design informants were presented to the public at the meeting. Members of the public
were given the opportunity to elaborate on the design informants that were identified, to
note their concerns about the space and to suggest potential uses as part of a future vision
for the space.
2.3 Stage 3
Stage 3 involved the preparation of the conceptual design framework and the design
proposal for the strategic design intervention. The design framework was developed taking
the stakeholder input that was received during the meeting with City Parks and the initial
public meeting that was held on 17 June 2015 into consideration.
Six potential projects were identified within the conceptual design framework. A catalytic
project was identified for activation of the Green Belt and a strategic design intervention
was developed. The final conceptual design framework, including six potential projects
and the strategic design intervention was presented to the City Parks Department on 29
June 2015.
A second public meeting was held to present the conceptual design framework, six
potential projects and the strategic design intervention to the public on 15 July 2015. The
public meeting also aimed to establish a partnership programme going forward to
facilitate the implementation of the project. Input received during the public meeting has
been incorporated into the development framework document.

3. SUB-REGIONAL ANALYSIS
The Elsieskraal Green Belt is located within the central portion of the City of Cape Town
(CoCT)’s metropolitan boundary and falls within the Salt River catchment area, which is
the third largest catchment in the CoCT (see Figure 3.1).
3.1 Hydrology
The hydrological information in this document is based on a Report prepared by the
Freshwater Consulting Group (Dr Liz Day) describing the current ecological condition and
water quality of the Elsieskraal River (Day, 2015).
There are three major river systems in the Salt River catchment area: the Liesbeek River,
the Black River and the Elsieskraal River (see Figure 3.2). The Elsieskraal River originates
in the Tygerberg Hills to the north of Durbanville. A number of impoundments have been
constructed along the upper reaches of the River, in some cases to encourage birdlife. The
River runs in a southerly direction through the Tygerberg Valley before running parallel to
Tyger Valley Road. This area has rapidly urbanized during recent years with the
construction of large shopping malls and high density residential and commercial
buildings.
The Elsieskraal River flows to the south of Voortrekker Road before joining the Vygekraal
River downstream of the Langa Road bridge. The combined river system merges with the
Black River in Mowbray. The Black River is then joined by the Liesbeek River to form the
Salt River Canal which drains into Table Bay. Portions of the catchment are prone to
flooding during high rainfall events, including a portion of the Elsieskraal River to the
south of Voortrekker Road (see Figure 3.2).
The CoCT manages a number of water quality monitoring points along the length of the
Elsieskraal River. The historical water quality record for the Elsieskraal River indicates
that the water quality of the River is significantly impaired. The River has been assigned a
Category E rating, indicating serious modification from natural conditions through almost
all of its reaches with the exception of the upper to middle reaches (Day, 2015).
3.2 Integrated Drainage System

Figure 3.3 indicates the integrated drainage system in the Salt River catchment area,
including portions of river systems that have remained natural, open canals, lined canals,
culverts and stormwater pipes. The river systems in the catchment area have largely been
modified and transformed, with the exception of the upper reaches which have remained
natural, in some portions. The site is associated with a system of concrete canals and
culverts. The majority of the Elsieskraal River further downstream is comprised of a lined
concrete canal interspersed with culverts and stormwater pipes below major roads and
urban areas. In this area, the River receives increasing amounts of stormwater from the
surrounding catchment area, which includes several industrial areas (Day, 2015).

Figure 3.1: Salt catchment and the site

Figure 3.2: Salt River catchment hydrology

Figure 3.3: Integrated drainage system

3.3 Climate
The Salt River catchment is characterized by the Mediterranean climate typical of the
Western Cape, with cold wet winters and hot dry summers. The predominant wind
direction is southerly to south-easterly with strong southerly winds dominating during
summer (see Figure 3.4). Northwesterly winds dominate during winter and are often
associated with cold fronts and rainfall events.
Figure 3.4: Sub-regional climate

3.4 Geology and Landscape Character

The Salt River catchment is bounded by the undulating Malmesbury Shale Tygerberg hills
to the northeast and the Malmesbury Shale foothills of the Table Mountain range to the
southeast. The majority of the Elsieskraal River is located largely within the low lying
sandy coastal plain which runs from False Bay and the Cape Flats in the southeast to Table
Bay in the northwest. The site is located at the boundary between the Malmesbury hills
and the lower lying sandy coastal plain (see Figure 3.5).
Figure 3.5: Geology and landscape character

3.5 Natural Vegetation

The Salt River catchment is located within the threatened Fynbos biome which is known
for its unique and biodiverse vegetation (see Figure 3.6). The site falls within the original
extent of the Cape Flats Sand Fynbos vegetation type. More than 80% of this vegetation
type has been transformed through urban development and agriculture and it is
considered to be Critically Endangered (Mucina and Rutherford, 2006). The site has been
significantly disturbed and contains no remnant patches of natural vegetation.
Figure 3.6: Natural Vegetation

3.6 Biodiversity Network

The CoCT’s biodiversity network indicates areas of ecological importance, including core
and buffer areas (see Figure 3.7). Core areas include the Tygerberg Nature Reserve which
is located to the northwest of the site and contains important remnants of Swartland Shale
Renosterveld. Areas along the Elsieskraal River to the north of the site, including the
Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park have also been identified as core areas. The Elsieskraal River
is identified as a buffer zone and serves as an important ecological corridor.
Figure 3.7: CoCT biodiversity network

3.7 Open Space Networks

The CoCT’s open space network is illustrated in Figure 3.8. Open spaces perform a number
of important functions within urban areas, including providing recreational and aesthetic
value and serving as ecological refuges. There are a number of open green spaces
associated with the Elsieskraal River to the north and south of the site. Figure 3.8
indicates that the open space associated with the site is comparatively small, but that it
forms an important link between the surrounding open space network.
Figure 3.8: CoCT open space network

3.8 Integrated Biodiversity and Open Space Networks

Figure 3.9 indicates an overlay of the CoCT’s biodiversity and open space networks. The
Elsieskraal River has the potential to serve as an important ecological and recreational link
between open spaces and biodiversity areas in the catchment area. Although the site itself
is not considered to be a core area, it forms an important node between green spaces in
the local area and has the potential to perform as an important ecological linkage to core
areas located within the wider biodiversity network.
Figure 3.9: Integrated biodiversity and open space network

4. LOCAL ANALYSIS
4.1 Green Spaces
A green open space network associated with the Elsieskraal River links the Danie Uys/Jack
Muller Park south of the N1 in the north to Elizabeth Park south of Voortrekker Road (see
Figure 4.1). The majority of the green open space network is accessible to the public,
excluding the sports fields associated with DF Malan High school and the southern portion
of the Elsieskraal Green Belt below Davies Road, which has been fenced off. Although the
river corridor is fragmented and the River is diverted below ground along certain portions
of its length, the green network of open spaces form an important ecological link and
presents opportunities for creating an integrated open space network in the local area.
Figure 4.1: Green open space network

4.2 Hydrology and Climate

The Elsieskraal River passes underground from the N1 to Jack Muller/Danie Uys Park and
under a sports field beneath Protea Road before entering the ecologically sterile, open
concrete canal associated with the site. This portion of the River consists of a concrete
canal which flows in a steep-sided grassed valley. The River then passes into a pipe culvert
under Voortrekker Road and daylights a further 105m downstream of Voortrekker Road, at
Elizabeth Park. The portion of the River in Elizabeth Park is the only section of the
channel south of the N1 that has retained any level of ecological function. The channel in
this area is not lined and supports indigenous, wetland and riverine vegetation as well as
some invasive species. Although it is degraded, it provides instream and marginal
freshwater habitat and ecological connectivity via its degraded lateral edges (Day, 2015).
The portion of the River that falls within the site is currently ecologically sterile and does
not contain any ecologically significant vegetation or perform any particular ecological
function. While the narrow lined canal ensures that the water is fast flowing, steps in the
canal and breaks in the concrete liners create areas of localized turbulence, which
promote aeration and is likely beneficial from a water quality perspective. Some grass and
weedy plants have lodged in cracks in parts of the canal that are slow flowing. However,
the River is largely devoid of vegetation and mostly functions as a stormwater conduit
with negligible ecological value (Day, 2015).
According to Day, 2015, two of the CoCT’s monitoring points are located upstream (north
of the N1) and downstream of the site (southwest of the Durban and Voortrekker Road
intersection). Measurements indicate that river quality deteriorated significantly along
this portion of the River in the period between 2001 and 2010, largely due to a period of
extensive development along Tyger Valley Road and the associated increased influx of
stormwater into the river system due to the hardened catchment conditions.
The main contributing factors to low water quality at the monitoring point upstream of
the site are high levels of orthophosphate and low concentrations of oxygen. Improved
water quality was noted at a monitoring point downstream of the site, largely due to the
presence of an uncanalized portion of the River upstream of the monitoring point and the
associated allowance of instream nutrient and pollution processing. With increased
distance from the monitoring point further downstream, water quality in the canal is
considered to be significantly polluted, as these areas are in close proximity to industrial
areas, hardened urban surfaces, semi-formal residential areas and aging infrastructure
(Day, 2015).
Low faecal coliform levels were measured in the northern and upper sections of the
Elsieskraal catchment (mostly associated with dam areas). At the monitoring point
upstream of the site, faecal coliform levels were found to be acceptable in 2011.
However, there is a significant deterioration in bacterial contamination in reaches
downstream of this monitoring point. The water quality in the site is considered to pose
unacceptable levels of risk to human health and even intermediate contact recreation
activities should not be allowed. Similar levels of unacceptable risk were identified in
areas downstream of the site, particularly the Black River further downstream. Water in
the site is being collected for drinking purposes by homeless people inhabiting the area
and the River is being used for the washing of clothes and ablutions. These activities are
not considered safe due to the high levels of faecal coliform in the River (Day, 2015).
The 1:50 and 1: 100 year floodlines for the area (which lie very closes together) are
indicated in Figure 4.2. Floodlines extend outside the lined portion of the canal and up the
steep grassed embankment, creating a 20m wide floodplain area in places. Adjacent urban
areas are not currently threatened by the flooding of the River during high rainfall events.
The accumulation of litter is also a prominent feature along the River and within the
Green Belt area. Although litter does not necessarily contribute to water quality, litter is
carried by water and collects in litter traps and grids downstream. Wind eddies also blow
litter into the southern portion of the site between Davies Avenue and Voortrekker Road.

Historical climatic data was obtained from the monitoring point at the Cape Town
International Airport which is located 8km south of the site (see Figure 4.2)
(Weatherspark, 2015). The site receives the highest level of precipitation in the winter
months, with the highest average rainfall in July. The winter months June to August are
also characterized by the highest number of rainy days, with monthly absolute minimum
temperatures below 5°C. The highest temperatures are experienced during the summer
months of December, January and February, with monthly absolute maximum
temperatures just above 35°C. The predominant wind direction is southerly during the
summer months and northerly to north westerly during winter.
Figure 4.2: Hydrology and climate

4.3 Movement Framework

The site is located along important mobility routes within the Bellville area (see Figure
4.3). The N1 to the north of Jack Muller/ Danie Uys Park serves as a regional mobility
route linking Cape Town to Paarl while the sub-regional Frans Conradie Drive links Durban
Road to Giel Basson Drive. Durban and Voortrekker Road serve as important local and sub-
regional mobility routes. Durban Road links the Bellville CBD to the N1, Tyger Valley and
Durbanville further north, while Voortrekker Road forms an important activity corridor
linking Bellville to Salt River. Pedestrian movement is focused along Durban and
Voortrekker Roads. The major pedestrian route through the site links Bellville Station to
Tyger Valley. Secondary linkages into the site from residential and commercial areas
located adjacent to the site are also indicated.
Figure 4.3: Movement framework

4.4 Activity Nodes and Major Vistas

Voortrekker Road and the portion of Durban Road between the Bellville Station and the
Voortrekker and Durban Road intersection form activity corridors that are characterised by
high levels of pedestrian, vehicular and commercial activity (see Figure 4.4). Important
activity nodes in the local area include the Bellville station, the Durban and Voortrekker
Road intersection, the shopping centre at the intersection between 12th avenue and
Durban Road and the entry point to the Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park. Due to the
topography of the site, the area to the north of Davies Road is more open and exposed and
an existing elevated bridge structure creates an important vista along the pedestrian route
to the north.
Figure 4.4: Activity nodes and major vistas

4.5 Zoning
The CoCT’s zoning plan for the local area is indicated in Figure 4.5. The portion of the site
to the east of the Danie Uys/ Jack Muller park and to the north of Avondale street and
some areas along Durban Road and south of Voortrekker Road are zoned for general
industrial use. Commercial activities are centred on Durban Road and Voortrekker Road.
Mixed uses occur in places along these routes with low and medium density residential
areas located just adjacent to the active road corridors. The Boston residential area is
located to the west of Durban Road, while the Oakdale residential area is located to the
east. The green open space network is zoned for public use, with the exclusion of the
fields associated with the DF Malan high school, which is zoned for community purposes
along with the adjacent Totius primary school to the west.
Figure 4.5: Zoning

4.6 Building Use

Buildings in the local area are used for various purposes (see Figure 4.6). Building use is
largely congruent with the CoCT’s zoning plan, with commercial and industrial activities
along Durban and Voortrekker Roads and residential areas set back from active areas.
There are a number of buildings used for religious and educational purposes within these
residential areas. The area around the Durban and Voortrekker Road intersections forms
part of the Bellville CBD. A number of health care facilities as well as the Bellville Library
are located to the south of Voortrekker Road. Public transport hubs associated with the
Bellville train and bus station activate commercial and mixed use activities to the south of
Voortrekker Road. The remainder of the activity corridors associated with Durban and
Voortrekker Roads are made up of mixed use, retail and commercial buildings.
Figure 4.6: Building use

4.7 Key Public Buildings

Significant public facilities in the local area are illustrated in Figure 4.7. Important
educational facilities include the DF Malan high school, the Totius primary school and the
Bellville public library. The Melomed Private Hospital and the Bellville police station are
located in close proximity to the site, to the south of Voortrekker Road. The South African
Revenue Service is located to the east of the site along Durban Road, while the
Department of Home Affairs is located to the west of the site along Voortrekker Road.
Shopping centres and public transport hubs serve as important commercial activity
centres. The site can serve as an important link between these public facilities and
commercial nodes. Public facilities and commercial nodes located in close proximity to the
site also have the potential to facilitate activity within the space.
Figure 4.7: Key public buildings and facilities

4.8 Building Heights

Building density and relative building heights in relation to the local area are illustrated in
Figure 4.8 and Figure 4.9. Building scale and massing is more pronounced along Durban
and Voortrekker Roads, while lower density and smaller scale buildings are associated with
the residential areas of Boston and Oakdale. A number of tall buildings occur along Durban
Road, notably three residential buildings taller than 16 stories to the east of the site. The
scale and massing of the buildings surrounding the site (particularly the southern portion),
indicate the urban nature of the River in this transformed environment. The high densities
associated with the buildings surrounding the site also indicate that there are a
considerable number of potential users of the site in the local area.
Figure 4.8: Building heights

Figure 4.9: Local area density and building heights

4.9 Socio-economic Conditions

According to the 2011 census data for the Bellville area (CoCT, 2013a), the total
population of Bellville was 44 209 in 2011. The number of households was 15 453, while
the average household size was 2.86. In 2011, the population was predominantly white
(61%) and 77% of those aged 20 years and older had completed Grade 12 or higher. 93% of
the labour force (aged 15 to 64) was employed and 19% of households had a monthly
income of R3 200 or less. Approximately 99% of households had access to piped water in
their dwelling or inside their yard, a flush toilet connected to the public sewer system,
had their refuse removed at least once a week and used electricity for lighting in their
dwelling.
The following data illustrates a comparison between the Bellville area and the CoCT as
whole. In 2011, the population of the CoCT was predominantly Coloured (42%) and Black
African (39%). 46% of those aged 20 years and older had completed Grade 12 or higher and
76% of the labour force (aged 15 to 64) was employed, while 47% of households had
monthly income of R3 200 or less. 78% of households lived in formal dwellings.
Approximately 87% of households had access to piped water in their dwelling or inside
their yard and a flush toilet connected to the public sewer system, while 94% of
households had their refuse removed at least once a week and used electricity for lighting
in their dwelling.
In terms of the census data 2011, the residents of the Bellville suburb are therefore
relatively affluent compared to the majority of residents within the CoCT Metropolitan
area. The Bellville CBD is an economic anchor point within the CoCT and therefore
attracts a variety of workers and commuters to the space during the day, some of whom
may travel from less affluent areas within the city. The project area presents an
opportunity for communities from different segments of society to interact within the
vibrant urban public space, allowing for interaction and collaboration and creating a sense
of community cohesion. Users that could potentially make use of the space include
scholars, students in the adjacent student residences, foreign nationals that live in the
area, the elderly, families from the adjacent residential areas and workers from the
surrounding office buildings.
4.10 Property Value Analysis

Figure 4.10 indicates the estimated property values of properties located within the
Voortrekker Road Corridor Integration Zone. The Voortrekker Road Corridor has been
identified as an Integration Zone by the CoCT, due to its central location in the
metropolitan area and its access to public transport and connectivity. The Integration
Zone has great potential for the strengthening of economic opportunities and the
intensification of residential and commercial activities within the corridor. The GTP is
working in close collaboration with the CoCT to drive densification and intensification
through encouraging strategic investment (GTP, 2015).
The project area is located within the northern portion of the Voortrekker Road Corridor
Integration Zone (see Figure 4.10). Properties that are located adjacent to the project
area currently have higher values than properties located within the southern portion of
the Integration Zone. The northern portion of the project area (adjacent to the area
known as Tielman Marais Park) is located in close proximity to schools. This portion of the
project area is currently better utilized by the public than areas further to the south
(which have been fenced off). The areas adjacent to Tielman Marais Park currently have
higher values than other areas surrounding the project area. The project area is located in
close proximity to schools and economic opportunities. With the creation of a safe, vibrant
and engaging public open space, it is envisaged that investment into the area would be
encouraged and that the property values of adjacent areas, including areas located
towards the southern portion of the project area, would increase.

Local Area
Figure 4.10: Property values within the Voortrekker Road Corridor Integration Zone
Source: City of Cape Town.

5. SITE ANALYSIS
5.1 Existing Infrastructure
Figure 5.1 indicates the existing infrastructure within and surrounding the site. A number
of informal footpaths meander through the area and a bridge structure is located in the
center of the northern portion of the site. The River is mostly canalized. It flows through a
culvert underneath Davies Road before being placed into a stormwater pipe and flowing
underneath Voortrekker Road. The River is visible at the surface again at Elizabeth Park. A
number of stormwater pipes enter into the river system from the surrounding urban areas.
There is a limited amount of existing lighting (mostly in the southern portion of the site).
However, the existing luminaries do not provide sufficient lighting at night. The southern
portion of the site (between Davies Avenue and Voortrekker Road) has been entirely
fenced off and access into the area is not permitted. However, access to the area is
currently gained through the stormwater culvert underneath Davies Road.
Figure 5.1: Existing infrastructure

5.2 Existing Trees

There are a number of existing trees at the site (see Figure 5.2). Although some trees are
well established, they are scattered in a largely unstructured way across the site. The
majority of trees in the area require pruning and maintenance to improve visibility and
safety in some areas. A number of trees at the site are invasive and have become
established along the banks of the stormwater culvert.
Figure 5.2: Existing trees

5.3 Elevation
Figure 5.3 illustrates the topographical elevation of the study area. The River is located at
a much lower elevation than the surrounding urban environment and has likely become
increasingly incised into the landscape over time as a result of the increased hardening
and anthropic modification of the surrounding catchment area. The elevation of the
embankments falls steeply towards the canalized area. The northern portion of the site is
at a slightly higher elevation than the southern portion. The northern portion is
characterized by steep embankments, while a portion of the southern portion to the north
of Voortrekker Road is relatively flat, although it remains at a lower elevation than the
northern portion.
Figure 5.3: Elevation

5.4 Topography and Slope Analysis

The areas indicated in Figure 5.4 illustrate the existing slopes in the area to facilitate an
understanding of the existing gradient conditions. Slopes that have a gradient greater than
1:4 and slopes that have a gradient of less than 1:4 are indicated in shades of green.
Slopes that have a gradient of more than 1:4 are more erodible and sensitive to
disturbance. These areas are not suitable for certain types of planting or development.
Slopes that have a gradient of less than 1:4 are more suitable for a wider variety of
development types. Development in steeper areas would require terracing and retaining
structures and embankments would need to be retained and maintained to prevent
erosion.
Figure 5.4: Slope analysis

5.5 Sections
Figure 5.5 illustrates existing cross sections through the space. It shows that the
Elsieskraal River has incised significantly into the surrounding topography and currently
runs in a narrow corridor at a much lower elevation that the surrounding buildings. The
sections also illustrate the scale and massing of the adjacent residential and commercial
buildings. Due to the low elevation of the River compared to the adjacent areas, it is not
directly perceivable from the street level and many passers-by may not even be aware
that it is there. The density of the surrounding urban areas indicates that there is a large
concentration of surrounding users that could be drawn towards the space, thereby
allowing visitors to interact and engage with the River environment.
Figure 5.5: Existing cross sections through the site

5.6 Micro-climate and Shadow Analysis

Figure 5.6 indicates the shadow analysis that was prepared for the site based on an
analysis of building heights and lighting conditions during winter. The figure illustrates
measurements were taken on 26 June during daylight hours between 8am and 4pm. The
southern portion of the study area receives less light than the northern portion. Areas that
receive less light would be cooler, particularly during winter, while sunnier areas would be
warmer. The southern portion of the site would therefore be warmer and sunnier while
the northern portion would be colder and wetter during winter conditions. This has
implications for the type of planting that will be suitable in various areas, as well as
programmatic and functional uses for the site.
Figure 5.6: Microclimate and shadow analysis

5.7 Urban Systems

Figure 5.7 indicates the existing urban systems associated with the site. Voortrekker and
Durban Road serve as major activity corridors, with local feeder routes in residential
areas. Existing pedestrian routes indicate pedestrian movement and desire lines. There
are a number of access points into the northern portion of the site, two of which are along
Langehoven Street, below DF Malan high school. There are also existing entry points into
the site at Wilge Street, Bloem Street and along Davies Avenue. A pedestrian bridge
structure connects the pedestrian network in the central portion of the site. Important
vistas of the site are available from this vantage point. Additional viewpoints onto the site
are available from areas with raised topography at Langenhoven Street, Davies Avenue and
Voortrekker Road. In the southern portion of the site, buildings no longer open out onto
the space and this has created ‘harsh edges’ where pedestrians could feel unsafe. A
concrete retaining wall structure along Durban Road similarly forms a harsh edge. These
areas could be activated by designing appropriate interventions in these areas.
Figure 5.7: Urban systems

5.8 Safety and Visibility

Figure 5.8 indicates the visibility of various portions of the study area, based on an
analysis of the topographical information and heights of the various buildings adjacent to
the site. The northern portion of the site is characterized by medium to low visibility. This
portion of the site remains largely open and visible, with the exception of the canalized
section of the River which is located at a considerably lower elevation and some areas
with steep embankments. The central portion of the site has low to no levels of visibility
due to the height and density of the surrounding buildings. Some portions of this area have
high to medium visibility due to the topography of the area and building facades looking
out onto the space. The flat area in southern portion of the site, above the intersection
between Voortrekker and Durban Road has low to no visibility. Personal discussions with
Stephan Fourie from Voortrekker Road Corridor Improvement District (VRCID) indicated
that the site is used as an escape route for criminals. It is also home to a number of
homeless people that live in the area, who may be responsible for low levels of
opportunistic crime.
Figure 5.8: Safety and visibility

5.9 Heritage
A heritage baseline study was prepared by Mike Scurr of Rennie Scurr Adendorf Architects
and Janine de Waal of Janine de Waal Architects and heritage practitioners for the
Elsieskraal Green Belt Open Space Corridor (Scurr & Adendorf, 2015). The information in
this section is based on the findings of this study. Heritage resources associated with the
project are illustrated as Figure 5.9.
Figure 5.9: Heritage resources
The Elsieskraal River has a long and rich history of settlement. The River itself played an
integral role in the development of the Tygerberg area. Pre-colonial inhabitants, such as
the Khoi herders inhabited the Tygerberg area and would likely have made use of the River
as a water source. The Khoi herders were effectively decimated with colonial expansion to
‘buitenposte’ during the 18th and 19th centuries.

The first colonial expedition to the Tygerberg area took place in 1657. Hardekraaltjie
(currently the Bellville Caravan Park) was an early outspan used by the VOC as a route to
the interior. This area received water from Tygerberg hills through Lobenstein. The
Elsieskraal River provided a reliable source of water, located not far from Hardekraaltjie.
However, no archival evidence suggests that the Elsieskraal River itself was used as an
outspan. Outspan areas were used as resting places associated with water. The outspan
area associated with the Durbanville area was known as Pampoenkraal. The route between
Hardekraaltjie (now Bellville) and Pampoenkraal (now Durbanville) ran along the
Elsieskraal River (currently adjacent to Durban Road).
The towns of Durbanville, Bellville and Parow were established early in the 20th century. A
railway line was constructed from Cape Town to Stellenbosch through the Cape Flats.
There were only two stations associated with the railway line at first, one at Salt River
and the other at Durban Road (now Bellville). The station was established in the vicinity of
the 12 mile beacon, indicating that it was located approximately 12 miles from Cape
Town. The town of Bellville was initially known as the Twelve Mile. The Twelve Mile
beacon is currently located at the intersection between Voortrekker and Durban Road, just
to the south of the project area. The Twelve Mile Beacon and the associated Oil lamp are
considered National Monuments (see Figure 5.9).
Many of the older historic buildings in Bellville were destroyed to facilitate economic
growth in the Bellville area during the 1970s and 1980s. However, some architectural
resources of heritage significance in close proximity to the project area have remained.
These heritage resources are illustrated in Figure 5.9 and include a number of buildings
which would be visible from the site, such as the Anglican Church west of Durban Road and
the Belpark and Volkskas buildings south of Voortrekker Road. The Lusthof apartments and
the Old Mutual buildings are located immediately adjacent to the site.
Scurr & de Waal (2015) recommend that considered landscape and design interventions
should be encouraged to enhance the space and that an overall landscape vision should be
developed for the space to maintain and enhance its integrity. The Elsieskraal River itself
is considered an important heritage resourse underpinning the historic development
pattern of the Tygerberg area. The River also has ecological and biophysical significance
and it is proposed that the Elsieskraal Green Belt is graded as a Grade IIIA heritage
resource.
5.10 Photography
The photographs below illustrate the various portions of the project area. Figure 5.10
illustrates the northern portion of the project area, to the south of Langenhoven Street,
which receives the most sunlight and is considered to be the most visually permeable and
accessible. Mature trees are scattered along the steep edges of the River embankment,
with an understory of mowed lawn. Figure 5.11 indicates the currently dilapidated
pedestrian bride structure linking Bloem and Wilge Streets. This route is perceived by local
residents as being an escape route for criminals. Figure 5.12 illustrates the portion of the
project area to the north of Davies Avenue. This area is flanked by medium residential
housing apartments that face onto the space, including the Lusthof apartments. These
units do not currently have direct access to the space. However, there is an opportunity
for connections to the open space to become established. Figure 5.13 illustrates the area
between Voortrekker Road and Davies Road. This area is currently fenced off due to safety
concerns. However, there is currently some surveillance onto the space from the
surrounding buildings, including the Old Mutual Building.

Figure 5.10: Northern portion of the project area to the south of Langenhoven Street
Figure 5.11: Bridge structure at the intersection between Bloem and Wilge Streets
Figure 5.12: Portion of the project area to the north of Davies Avenue
Figure 5.13: Portion of the project area north of Voortrekker Road

6. INFORMANTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS

6.1 Informants Diagram
The most essential components of the analysis information presented above was combined
into an informants diagram to illustrate the existing characteristic of the site, with the
intention of identifying opportunities and constraints for design (see Figure 6.1):
 Heritage resources (including the River, Lusthof Apartments. The Old Mutual
Building, the Oil Lamp and the Twelve Mile Beacon);
 Hydrological informants such as flood zones and stormwater outlets;
 Existing mature trees;
 Activity Corridors along Durban and Voortrekker Roads as well as existing
pedestrian movement routes and access points;
 Important viewpoints onto the space;
 Harsh urban edges where the urban fabric does not engage with the space;
 Areas of low visibility which may be of safety concern;
 Areas that receive the most and least sunlight; and
 Areas with steep slopes.
6.2 Opportunities and Constraints

Based on the analysis information presented in the informants diagram, a number of
potential opportunities and constraints associated with the project area were identified.
Potential constraints include:
 Water quality is very low and could pose a risk to those who come in contact with
it;
 The canal is fast flowing and steeply sloped and this presents a limitation for
rehabilitation towards a functional ecological system.
 The River corridor is fragmented and there are no continuous movement routes or
pedestrian access routes linking the space.
 The space is currently underutilized and has become degraded and unsafe.
 There is currently poor visibility and surveillance in some areas.
 There is no clear visual connectivity towards the River from the surrounding urban
environment.
 The interface between buildings adjacent to the space and the project area is poor
and many buildings along the edge do not face onto or have access to the space.
Potential opportunities include:
 Cohesive design interventions could tie fragmented portions of the environment
together to enhance and unify the Green Belt.
 Safety would improve with increased surveillance.
 Activities and facilities could be introduced to enable improved public use.
 Users could be encouraged to move through the space through the creation of
cohesive movement routes.
 The interface between the public and private realms should be addressed in a
positive manner through architectural interventions at adjacent buildings that
respond positively to the Green Belt.
 Water should be celebrated as an essential component of the project.
 The upgrade and rehabilitation of the canal could include widening the canal in
areas to include zones within the wetted channel, in which riverine species could
be planted.
 Water from the smaller stormwater pipes could be collected in swales or shallow
depressions to slow down its passage into the canal system and create artificial
wetland areas.

 Groundcover plants could be established along the top of the River to simulate a
natural ecological system.
 Hardy, locally indigenous species could be used that would not contribute nuisance
seeds or other propagules into downstream reaches.
The informants, constraints and opportunities presented above were presented to the
public during the stakeholder engagement process (see Section 7). This process formed the
basis for the formulation of the conceptual design framework (see Section 8).
Figure 6.1: Informants diagram: opportunities and constraints

7. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
An initial meeting was held on 17 June 2015 to discuss the project with members of the
public. At this meeting, Gibbs Saint Pôl presented the analysis information included in
Sections 3, 4 and 5 of this Report, as well as the informants diagram described in Section
6. Members of the public were invited to participate in a design charrette to identify
potential opportunities and constraints, and to develop a vision for the project area (see
Figure 7.1).
Figure 7.1: Photographs from the public meeting held on 15 June 2015
A design framework and a strategic design intervention for the project area was prepared
by Gibbs Saint Pôl, taking the comments received from stakeholders during the first
meeting into consideration (see Section 8). A second meeting was held on 15 July 2015 to
present the design framework for the site as well as the proposed strategic design
intervention to the public. The purpose of the meeting was to provide an opportunity for
the public to give their input into the final framework and assist with the formulation of a
partnership programme going forward (see Section 9). The meeting notes containing a
detailed description of the discussions that were held at this meeting are included in
Appendix B.
A summary of the concerns raised by stakeholders during both meetings is provided in
Table 7.1 below. Details of the community’s proposed vision for the space, providing a
comprehensive overview of potential opportunities for the space identified by members of
the public during the first meeting are also summarized in the table below. The
information provided by members of the public was incorporated into the conceptual
framework design presented in Section 8. Please refer to Appendix A and B for further
information regarding the discussions that were held at each of the meetings, as well as
specific information relating to the particular concerns of local residents. Additional
comments written received from stakeholders are attached as Appendix C.

Table 7.1: Stakeholder engagement: Opportunities and constraints and vision for the space.
Concerns Vision for the space
Crime and safety concerns and Children’s play areas in southern and northern portions.
the use of the Green Belt as an
Vegetable gardens and urban agriculture in the northern
escape route for criminals.
portion.
Vagrants using the River and the
Rose or flower gardens attracting visitors to the space and
associated Green Belt for
creating the potential to have rose or flower growing
ablutions.
competitions.
Illegal activities, including drug
Sports ground/ sporting facilities for Cricket/Soccer in the
abuse and sex.
southern portion.
Litter, including drug
BMX cycling tracks or bicycle tracks leading through the
paraphernalia and condoms.
project area.
Poor maintenance and
A skate park for children in the northern portion.
infrastructural dilapidation,
including the degradation of A mini golf course/ putt-putt area in the northern portion.
river embankments and paved
A potential coffee shop in the northern portion.
areas. Some areas are
hazardous. A dog park for people with dogs in the area.
Access control is of concern and Picnic areas.
stricter access control is
required to reduce crime. Walkways leading through the space to allow trail runs
linking to the Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park.
Low visibility at night provides
opportunities for criminal Usable facilities for the old age home, such as trails/
activities. paths, resting spots underneath trees.
Appropriate seating (benches) in strategic places next to
pathways or overlooking particular areas.
Signage to assist with orientation and provide information
about the park.
Art and sculptures in strategic locations.
Appropriate planting (low shrubs) to maximize visibility
and safety.
Appropriate trees in appropriate places, some of which
could be pruned to create sculptural elements.
Use as a wedding venue with trees/ rose garden/
sculptural elements as a backdrop for photographs.
Use for Christmas Carols during Christmas time.
Artificial wetland features to filter stormwater and
improve water quality in the River.
Ablution facilities that can be used during the daytime and
secured at night.
Appropriate lighting to ensure safety at night.
Proper maintenance so that the area is kept clear of litter
at all times.
Developments that complement the site (such as the
coffee shop that has been proposed by a local resident in
the southern portion of the site) must be supported.

8. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK DESIGN

The conceptual design framework intends to present a strategic vision for the project area
that could be implemented over time (see Section 8.5). It has been formulated based on
the integration of three conceptual components: Structuring (see Section 8.1), Zoning (see
Section 8.2) and Programming (see Section 8.3).
Section 8.6 elaborates on how the conceptual design framework can be divided into
various elements or components to allow for implementation over an extended time
period, as the need arises and funding becomes available. It should be noted that the
conceptual design framework is intended as an overall vision for the project area,
indicating what could potentially be possible over time. It includes a large number of
potential uses that could populate the site and the intention would be to provide a range
of activities to draw people into the space, thereby creating a lively, active and safe
environment.
It is important to note that funding may not be available for the implementation of all the
activities that are suggested. In addition, certain activities that are suggested may no
longer be feasible at the time of implementation, or could be accommodated in areas
adjacent to the site such as Elizabeth Park and the Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park. The most
important elements of the conceptual design framework have therefore been distilled into
the strategic design intervention, which has been identified as the most important,
primary design intervention (see Section 8.7).
In summary, the conceptual design framework would then allow for certain elements to be
excluded and additional elements to be incorporated during future phases of the project.
This would take place as a collaborative process facilitated by the partnership programme
initiative, in consultation with stakeholders (see Section 9).
8.1 Landscape Structuring Diagram

The landscape structuring diagram illustrates the overall structuring concept underpinning
the design framework (see Figure 8.1). The Elsieskraal River itself forms the central spine
of the project area and is the most important linking and structuring element at the site.
Although it is currently degraded, there is an opportunity to enhance the amenity value of
the River and harness its ecological and recreational potential. The presence of the River
should be acknowledged as the most important element at the site and opportunities
should be created for it to be celebrated. This could include simple interventions, such as
allowing people the opportunity to view onto the River environment at strategic locations.
Major pedestrian linkages through the project area are illustrated in red, showing the
potential linkage through the Green Belt from the Bellville station towards the Tyger
Valley area further to the north. The route also serves to link the Jack Muller / Danie Uys
Park, the Green Belt and Elizabeth Park. The intention is that the route could be traversed
by cyclists, runners and other users for recreational purposes. It could also be used as an
alternative route for pedestrians currently making use of Durban Road. Secondary
pedestrian linkages are illustrated in orange. These linkages can be used by visitors to
access various portions of the project area and experience different components and
elements within the design framework. The secondary route could be used as a running/
cycling trail to allow visitors an opportunity to veer off the main route, thereby offering
experiential diversity. The Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park is currently used for periodic park
runs that are organized by members of the community. The linkages created as part of the
design framework would allow for the Park run to extend towards the Green Belt, thereby
attracting visitors to the space.
Structural linkages are positioned at intervals throughout the design framework. These
linkages aim to provide structure and cohesion to the design framework. Various activities
could occur in spaces created at intervals between structural elements. The structural
elements could be expressed in various ways, including strategically placed benches, low
walls, sculptural elements, embankments, trees, planting, stepping stones and small

bridge structures. Structuring elements could also perform as tertiary movement routes
crossing over the River in places, with the use of stepping stones or terraced
embankments. These elements can be designed to be integrated with the context of their
particular location within the design framework in terms of the landscape zoning diagram
(see Section 8.2). Elements that are located in more urban environments could consist of
harder, urban materials, while elements located in more suburban environment could
consist of softer, natural materials. Some of these linkages are associated with stormwater
outlets and there is an opportunity for water purification, dissipation and treatment
through interventions such as artificial wetlands.
Potential entry points to the site and surrounding areas (such as Elizabeth Park and the
Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park) are indicated in Figure 8.1. It should be noted that
accessibility and safety are of key concern to stakeholders in the area. The provision of
fencing was suggested by local residents as a solution to safety concerns. However,
fencing and access control should be implemented in a strategic way to ensure that they
do not reduce the safety and desirability of the space, thereby attracting further illicit
activities. Passive surveillance through encouraging increased movement throughout the
space would likely result in a safer environment for users of the space. Suggested entry
points have been limited in the southern portion of the site, which is currently fenced off
and where security is of key concern. Suggested entry points in the northern portion of the
site are more evenly distributed to allow increased accessibility and movement throughout
the space and subsequently surveillance and safety. It is important to note that access
control and fencing would need to be considered strategically during the implementation
phase to ensure that safety and security is not compromised through the implementation
of inappropriate fencing interventions.
8.2 Landscape Zoning Diagram

The conceptual development framework can be divided into areas with distinct
characteristics or ‘zones’ (see Figure 8.2). The northern portion of the project area is
flanked by residential and educational facilities. This portion is more visually permeable
and receives more sunlight than areas further to the south. It is described as the
‘suburban zone’ in terms of the framework. The character of this area would naturally
allow for activities that would engage families and residential users.
The area to the north of Davies Road is considered to be a ‘transition zone’ between the
‘suburban zone’ to the north and the ‘urban zone’ to the south. This area is flanked by
medium density residential and commercial areas. This zone would allow for a variety of
mixed uses, bordering between urban and suburban typologies.
The area between Davies Road and Voortrekker Road is surrounded by high density
residential and commercial areas. It is also located at the intersection between the
Voortrekker and Durban Road activity corridors. This area is considered to be the ‘urban
zone’ within the framework and would allow for activities that would be more suitable to
an active, urban environment.

Figure 8.1: Landscape Structuring Diagram

Figure 8.2: Landscape Zoning Diagram

8.3 Landscape Programming Diagram

The landscape programming diagram (see Figure 8.3) indicates the potential uses for the
space that were identified in consultation with the public during the stakeholder
engagement process. Various uses have been allocated in accordance with what would be
considered suitable in terms of the landscape zoning diagram and the structural
framework described above.
The programming diagram illustrates an overall vision for the space and includes a number
of elements. The programming diagram was used to inform the uses illustrated in the
conceptual design framework (see Section 8.5). As discussed above, the programming of
the framework can be revised during implementation to include additional elements or
exclude certain elements over time, depending on need, desirability and feasibility.
Suitable uses and activities should be established during future phases of the project as
part of a collaborative process associated with the partnership programme initiative (see
Section 9).
It should also be noted that the programming diagram illustrates an overall large scale
vision encompassing a myriad of potential uses. It is possible that all the potential uses
that are suggested may not be feasible, due to financial or other constraints. The
intention of the programming diagram is to illustrate potential programmatic uses that
could enliven and activate the space. However, the strategic design intervention
illustrates the most important strategic intervention within the space that should be
implemented. The identified uses can be structured around the strategic design
intervention, and are interchangeable with other, more appropriate uses (some of which
could be retaining areas as passive recreation and open space areas).
Elements that have been included on the programming diagram in the suburban zone
include:
 Play area;
 Urban agriculture;
 Flower garden;
 Picnic lawn area;
 Dog park; and
 Place to celebrate and acknowledge the River (River celebration point).
Elements that have been included on the programming diagram in the transition zone:
 Lawn area for passive recreation;
 Skate park;
 Picnic area;
 Indigenous vegetation; and
 Wetland.
Elements that have been included on the programming diagram in the urban zone:
 Market square to the north of Voortrekker Road;
 Flexible sport area;
 Urban picnic/ lunch area;
 A River celebration point to acknowledge the importance of the River; and
 Sculptural river feature underneath Davies Road to celebrate the River and create
a point of interest.
The intention of populating the space with a variety of uses would be to ensure that the
space becomes well utilized and surveilled. Recreational activity would improve safety.

Figure 8.3: Landscape Zoning Diagram

8.4 Precedent
Various examples of precedent for the transformation of river systems in urban
environments were investigated to inform the development of the design framework.
These were also presented to the public at the first public meeting to assist with the
formulation of a vision for the space.
The precedent that was investigated includes the upgrade of Boneyard Creek in Urbana,
Illinois (see Figure 8.4), the daylighting of the Sawmill River in Yonkers, New York (see
Figure 8.5) and the transformation of Houtan Park in Shanghai (see Figure 8.6). Each of
these examples provides an indication of how degraded river systems could be revitalized
by creating ecological landscapes within which surrounding communities can engage and
interact with natural environments in an urban setting.
The principles behind these projects could be drawn through into the execution of the
framework plan. The River edge could be cohesively upgraded and restored to create
terraces along steep embankments, to allow visitors to access the river environment,
while creating opportunities for seating and planting (see Figure 8.4). Hard concrete edges
could be softened by simple interventions such as the introduction of stone materials to
create opportunities for ecological habitats and creating visual interest (see Figure 8.5).
Significantly degraded areas could become transformed through simple interventions such
as planting and the provision of walkways leading through the space (see Figure 8.6).
Before After
Design Concept Design Concept
Figure 8.4: Boneyard Creek, Urbana, Illinois

Source: HNTB Wenk, 2008

Before After
After After
Figure 8.5: Sawmill River, Yonkers, New York

Source: Saratoga Associates, 2015.
Before After
Before After
Figure 8.6: Houtan Park, Shanghai

Source: Yu & Turenscape, 2015.

8.5 Proposed Conceptual Design Framework

The proposed conceptual design framework is illustrated in Figure 8.7. At a local scale,
the Green Belt is envisaged as a linkage between the Danie Uys/ Jack Muller Park to the
north and Elizabeth Park to the south. The intention is that the integration between the
green space networks and non-motorized transport routes would allow the space to be
activated by pedestrian movement. A primary walkway linking these spaces runs along the
eastern boundary of the project area. Secondary pathways allow visitors to meander
through the variety of potential activities that could occur within the space. Structural
elements provide horizontal linkages that create spaces within which activities can occur
and various activities are spread throughout the space.
A variety of potential uses for the space are presented, including walking, running and
cycling routes, outdoor gym or adventure equipment, informal play areas, formal sport
areas and a skate park. Informal recreational activities are allowed for, including picnic
areas, a dog park and informal lawn areas that could be used for outdoor play and
adventure activities. Productive urban landscapes are created including urban agricultural
and flower gardens, which would encourage community involvement and engagement. An
urban market square is suggested to the north of Voortrekker Road to attract visitors to
the space and provide economic opportunities for local entrepreneurs. This area is located
along a major pedestrian movement route, which could be used to activate movement
within the space. The ‘urban zone’ could also be used as an urban picnic area for workers
in the surrounding office buildings.
Opportunities are created for the River to be celebrated and expressed. The River can be
widened out and softened in areas to create wetland habitats that would improve the
water quality and create opportunities for ecological diversity. Meandering pathways
through areas of natural vegetation and wetland habitats provide opportunities for the
public to engage with the natural environment in an urban setting. Simple interventions
such as the cohesive terracing and reinforcement of the River embankments could re-
affirm the importance of the River within the historic and natural setting of Bellville. The
placement of stone edges and strategic planting could also serve to create a sense of
enlivenment and opportunities for ecological revitalization within the space. The
importance of water is expressed through the creation of a splash park and opportunities
for play in the urban zone to the north of Voortrekker Road. All of these interventions
would provide educational opportunities regarding the role of nature in an urban
environment.
Maintenance activities would become a key priority to facilitate the revitalization of the
project area. Trees that currently cause visual obstructions could be removed or pruned
to ensure visual permeability and subsequently surveillance and safety. Litter collection
drives could be organized by the local community or schools to highlight the importance of
ecological consciousness and illustrate a sense of ownership over the space. Diverse
meadow or grass species could be planted and strategically mowed to create open lawn
areas and picnic spots in certain areas.
The conceptual framework provides an overall vision for the space, and has been designed
in such a way that it can be amended and improved during the implementation phase. The
framework has been divided into a number of potential projects that can be implemented
over time, as the need arises and funding becomes available. The proposed projects which
could be implemented are discussed and described in more detail in Section 8.6.These
projects could be implemented in collaboration with the partnership programme
initiative, as opportunities become available (see Section 9). It should once again be noted
that not all of the proposed programmatic activities suggested as part of the conceptual
framework would necessarily be feasible for implementation. It should be determined
during future phases of the development whether specific uses or activities would be
feasible and viable, or if they would be more suitable in other areas (such as the Danie
Uys/ Jack Muller Park or Elizabeth Park).

Figure 8.7: Proposed conceptual design framework

8.6 Projects for Implementation

As discussed, the conceptual framework presents an overall vision for the park and
identifies a number of potential projects which could be implemented over time, as
opportunities arise or funding becomes available. The projects have been divided into a
number of complementary uses that could be implemented over time. Each of the six
potential projects are discussed in more detail in the section below.
8.6.1 Structuring and Linkages
Structuring and linkages are considered to be crucial components of the design framework
(see Figure 8.8). The strategic design intervention presented in Section 8.7 elaborates in
more detail on the elements that would provide structure and cohesion to the overall
design. These elements would include some of the following (described in more detail in
Section 8.7):
 Pathways (including primary and secondary linkages);
 Lighting (focussed along primary pathways and areas with low visibility);
 Signage (providing way finding and creating sense of place);
 Seating (strategically placed to reinforce the overall structuring of the design); and
 Trees (providing shade, scenic amenity and creating unique spaces).
Figure 8.8: Structuring and linkages

8.6.2 Outdoor Market Space

The southern portion of the site, between Voortrekker Road and Davies Road is currently
underutilized and entirely fenced off. This area requires the most substantial intervention
to allow the space to be safe and useable. A number of residential buildings currently face
onto the space and it is located at an active urban zone, providing substantial
opportunities for revitalization. A number of potential uses for the space discussed during
the first public meeting were incorporated, including (see Figure 8.9):
 An urban market square to the north of Voortrekker Road which would facilitate a
variety of commercial uses;
 A coffee shop adjacent to the Parc Du Ville building (the owner of the building has
expressed a desire to create such an area);
 Sports fields or passive play areas incorporating action cricket and netball, bringing
activity to the space after dark;
 Urban picnic areas for adjacent residents and office workers;
 A splash park or play area for children highlighting the importance of water in an
urban environment; and
 A sculptural river feature at the Davies Road crossing to highlight and express the
importance of the River, with the aim of alleviating security concerns associated
with this currently neglected space.
Figure 8.9: Outdoor market space

8.6.3 Cultivation
Urban agricultural and flower growing activities have been positioned in the northern
portion of the project area (see Figure 8.10). This portion receives the most natural
sunlight and is located adjacent to residential housing, retirement homes and schools.
Agricultural activities would attract users to the space, while providing a source of income
and creating educational opportunities. Local schools or community organizations could
make use of the public space to create a productive landscape. Flower gardens could
become a source of pride for the community, and provide an attractive focal point within
the Green Belt. Community involvement of local residents and schools would be key to
ensure that these activities become successful, well managed and maintained. There is an
opportunity for these activities to become self-sufficient over time through income
generation. Flowers and agricultural products could potentially be sold at the urban
market square proposed to the north of Voortrekker Road during peak times or over
weekends. This would enforce the sense of community and highlight the importance of the
Green Belt as a vibrant open space to be shared and engaged with by the entire
community.
Figure 8.10: Cultivation

8.6.4 Outdoor Fitness Activities

The space functions as a linear linkage between adjacent green space areas associated
with the Elsieskraal River system. The space lends itself to the creation of linking walking,
running and cycling routes which can facilitate passive outdoor exercise and fitness
activities. A number of potential outdoor fitness activities are located at various intervals
within the framework, including (see Figure 8.11):
 A play area associated with the residential areas to the north;
 A skate park to the north of Davies Road, which could be sculpturally integrated
with the existing retaining wall along this edge. The skate park could also
incorporate urban art/ graffiti to create visual interest and a sense of vibrancy;
 Outdoor gym equipment which can be located at intervals throughout the space, or
within specific areas, depending on the suitability of placement; and
 Outdoor adventure equipment, including climbing walls or obstacle courses in areas
with steep terrain; and
 Areas for passive recreations play such as open ‘kick-about’ areas.
Stakeholders have also suggested the incorporation a putt-putt course to attract visitors to
the space, as well as action cricket and netball fields that can be used at night (see
Section 8.6.2).
Figure 8.11: Outdoor fitness activities

8.6.5 Natural
The natural ecology of the project area has been largely transformed. However, the River
provides opportunities for the creation of habitats which would perform ecological
functions such as the improvement of water quality. The River could be widened out in
areas and portions of the concrete canal could be removed to soften the embankments
and allow for the establishment of natural vegetation. Steep embankments could also be
terraced to provide opportunities for planting and the creation of ecological niches in
certain areas. Wetland areas could be used as an educational tool with the use of
appropriate signage and walkways leading through the space, allowing visitors to
understand the importance of ecology in an urban environment. The use of indigenous
species should be encouraged as far as possible throughout the project design.
Figure 8.12: Natural

8.6.6 Leisure
Certain strategies require minimal intervention, including the creation of open lawn areas
which could be used for passive recreational activities. These areas would allow for
informal uses such as play, relaxation and picnicking. A dog park and play area could also
be included where owners would be able to allow their dogs off their leashes to encourage
interaction and play. These activities would not be cost intensive interventions and could
occur organically as the project develops. Although these activities would require minimal
intervention, the provision of spaces with no specifically programmed uses is important to
provide areas in which unstructured and spontaneous activities could take place.
Figure 8.13: Leisure

8.7 Strategic Design Intervention

Of the proposed projects presented in Section 8.6, the structuring and linkages
intervention is considered to be the project which should be prioritized for
implementation. This intervention would serve to create structural cohesion throughout
the design framework and allow for a variety of uses to occur within the spaces that are
created in between the structural components.
The strategic design intervention is illustrated in Figure 8.14, and can be divided into
linkages and structural elements. Linkages allow for movement throughout the space and
provide structure and cohesion to the design, while structural elements re-inforce these
linkages. Linkages are centered on the linear linkage of the River system and include
primary, secondary and tertiary routes. Structural elements which re-inforce these
linkages include lighting, seating, trees and sculptural features. Each of these elements is
elaborated upon in more detail below.
The River system is the most important structural linkage in the design, on which all the
linkages within the framework are centered. The River embankments have become
degraded and dilapidated and have been repaired using a variety of materials. This has
reduced the visual congruency of the overall design. The rehabilitation of the River’s
embankments should focus on the use of cohesive materials which are locally sourced and
represent elements of the local geology. Steep embankments should be shaped and
formed in certain areas to provide opportunities for seating and planting. A sense of
cohesion could be created through simple interventions such as the strategic placement of
stones along concrete edges.
The primary pathway linking through the site aims to tie into pedestrian movement and
activity along Durban Road and encourage pedestrians to use this linkage as their primary
movement route. Similar materials should be used along the primary and secondary
movement routes to indicate cohesion and accessibility to local users. The use of local
materials and labour intensive construction techniques should be encouraged to reduce
costs and create job opportunities. Pathways should allow for universal access and ramps
should be provided where necessary. Movement routes and linkages throughout the
project area are intended as cycling routes and the provision of ramps would also
encourage cyclists to use the space. Tertiary linkages crossing over the River would
encourage movement and accessibility across the space. These could be expressed in
different ways, including the upgrade of the existing bridge structure, or the provision of
stepping stones in certain areas.
An urban square area is suggested to the north of Voortrekker Road. This area would serve
to draw visitors into the space, with the provision of a generous staircase that could
potentially also allow the space to be used as an amphitheater. This component comprises
of the strategic design intervention is of crucial importance to draw visitors into the space
and encourage activity and movement throughout the Green Belt. The space also creates
an opportunity for the River to be daylighted in this portion, allowing visitors to interact
and engage with the River in this urban zone.
Seating and benches should be placed in strategic locations to reinforce the overall
cohesion of the design. These elements are proposed at intersections between primary,
secondary and tertiary linkages. Sculptural elements could be used to re-enforce the
design cohesion and create a sense of interest. These could be expressed in a variety of
ways, including low walls that can be used for seating or to define space and linkages or
could turn into terraces across steep embankments.
Trees should be strategically placed to reinforce the overall structural cohesion of the
design. Trees have been positioned along the primary route leading through the project
area and at focal points at intersections with tertiary linkages. Deciduous trees could be
used to provide shading in summer and allow sunlight to penetrate the space in winter.
Where existing trees reduce visibility, they should be trimmed or removed to improve
safety and allow visual permeability.

Figure 8.14: Proposed strategic design intervention

The provision of lighting would aim to increase visibility at night and reduce security
concerns, while reinforcing the structural linkages within the design. The northern portion
of the project area currently has a number of spot lights and street lighting providing light
within the space. The amount of lighting reduces as you move further towards the south
and the southern portion above Voortrekker Road is practically unlit. Proposed lighting is
denser in the ‘urban zone’, where security is of concern and there is currently limited
lighting. Proposed lighting centers on the primary movement route through the space and
decreases in density as it moves further north toward areas within the ‘suburban zone’
which are currently well lit (Figure 8.15). The various elements described above are also
illustrated as a 3D photomontage in Figure 8.16.
Figure 8.15: Proposed strategic design intervention – lighting plan

Figure 8.16: Strategic design intervention conceptualization

9. PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN

9.1 Partnership Programme Initiative
Funding for the proposed project has not been confirmed. However, funding could
potentially be sourced from various parties, including public and private sectors. The
success of the project ultimately rests on community collaboration and support and the
strength of the partnership programme initiative which would need to be established to
drive implementation. The partnership programme initiative would involve collaboration
between various public and private parties, including local residents, neigbouring schools
and business associations and the potential formation of a ‘friends of the Green Belt’
initiative. During future phases of the project, certain elements of the framework will
need to be prioritized for implementation in collaboration between GTP, City Parks and
the ‘friends of the Green Belt’ group.
City Parks has been consulted as part of the stakeholder engagement process and have
expressed willingness to assist with the project in collaboration with community members,
where possible. The role of the GTP would be to facilitate discussions between members
of the public and the City Parks Department and to facilitate development initiatives
suggested by community members through the public partnership initiative. Funding from
various government departments could potentially be secured, depending on
interdepartmental collaboration and the availability of funding for certain activities.
Funding could also be secured from private initiatives, supported by the partnership
programme.
Community members have expressed interest in participating to encourage the
development of the project. The Boston Ratepayers association and local councilor could
collaborate with community members on the formulation of a ‘friends of the Green Belt’
group. The involvement of local schools such as the DF Malan and Settlers High Schools and
the Totius, Boston and Vredelust Primary Schools would also be greatly beneficial to the
partnership programme initiative. Schools or local communities could take ownership of
various components of the project, such as flower gardens or urban agricultural areas,
creating educational opportunities for engagement. In addition, the following community
organizations that could potentially become involved in various aspects associated with
the project have been identified (this is by no means an exhaustive list and the relevant
stakeholders and participants should be identified over time as the project progresses):
 Church groups such as Badisa and Armoede en Sorg that work with disadvantaged
people in the area, could become involved in horticultural maintenance projects as
a form of income generation;
 Straatwerk which employs small groups of unskilled labourers to do manual labour
such as litter clearing or horticultural maintenance;
 Mould Empower Serve (MES), (focusing on poverty alleviation and community
upliftment in the Bellville area);
 VRCID, focusing on crime prevention and social upliftment in the Bellville CBD
area; and
 Greenpop (an organization involved with urban greening initiatives)
The development of the framework will ultimately take place as a collaborative process
facilitated by the partnership programme initiative, in collaboration with the GTP and the
City Parks Department. This document contains the initial information required to
facilitate the development of the partnership programme initiative, while presenting an
overall vision for the space. The implementation of the project would need to be driven
by the Partnership Programme initiative with support from the local community to allow
implementation over time.

9.2 Recommendations
A number of recommendations are suggested below to facilitate the future development
and implementation of the strategic design intervention:
 A strong intervention is required to ensure that the full potential of the project
area is realised, to attract users to the space and to increase safety and
surveillance in the space.
 A Landscape Architect should be appointed to develop the detailed design and
construction of the strategic design intervention. This would ensure that a strong
and cohesive design intervention is implemented.
 Future work should build on the findings and recommendations of this Report, in
consultation with the relevant authorities and stakeholders.
 The importance of the Elsieskraal River should be the key component of any future
design interventions.
 Safety and security would need to be carefully considered during the
implementation phase. Access control and fencing would need to be considered
strategically to ensure that safety and security is further not compromised through
the implementation of inappropriate fencing interventions. Crime Prevention
through Environmental Design principles should be incorporated to ensure that the
Elsieskraal Green Belt is designed appropriately to increase passive surveillance
and improve safety.
 The public participation process to date has largely involved residents that live
immediately adjacent to the Elsieskraal Green Belt. Multiple users would
potentially make use of the space and future public participation processes should
aim to involve potential users of the space from all segments of society.

10. CONTRIBUTORS
Mark Saint Pôl PrLArch # 20201 (SACLAP), MLArch (UCT), BTech Env Man (CPUT), NDip
Hort (DIT), having studied, trained and worked in South Africa, the United Kingdom and
Australia, has 16 years of experience in Horticulture, Environmental Management and
Landscape Architecture. He graduated from UCT’s Master of Landscape Architecture
Programme with distinction after having received several academic scholarship awards. In
addition, he earned the ILASA National Award for Best Thesis Project, as well as the ILASA-
Cape Award for overall Academic Excellence. He has contributed to journal articles
published both locally and internationally, and has also taught Construction, Plants and
Design and Design Studio in the Landscape Architecture programme at UCT. After working
within other practices on a range of significant projects, including Green Point Park, Mark
co-founded gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc in 2011.
Larissa Heyns PrLArch #20227 (SACLAP), MLArch (UCT), BSc ConsEcol (2005) is a
professional Landscape Architect and Environmental Consultant with 6 years of
experience. She graduated from UCT's Master of Landscape Architecture Programme with
distinction in 2010. Her thesis focused on the re-invention of the Cape Flats Waste Water
Treatment Works and the creation of an accessible, didactic landscape allowing visitors to
experience and engage with ecological design. Following graduation, she worked as a
Landscape Architect for a number of years on a range of projects including the
development of Crossways Farm Village near Port Elizabeth, an innovative mixed-use rural
village development incorporating the principles of sustainable development. She became
registered as a professional Landscape Architect in 2013 and subsequently worked as an
Environmental Consultant on a number of large scale EI) projects within the Western and
Northern Cape as well as Angola and Guinea. She is currently eligible for registration with
the Interim Certification Board for Environmental Practitioners, South Africa. Her
expertise includes environmental planning and sensitivity analysis, landscape architectural
design, VIA, EIAs, and Environmental Management Plans (EMPs).
Winston White PrLArch # 20229 (SACLAP), MLArch (UCT), BTech LTech (TUT), NDip LTech
(DUT) is a professional Landscape Architect and Environmental Planner with 8 years’
experience having worked at Uys & White Landscape Architects and CNdV Africa Planning
and Design prior to joining gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc. Winston has developed
expertise in visual impact assessment, digital modelling, visual simulation methodology
and graphic representation. Winston graduated from UCT’s Master of Landscape
Architecture programme in 2010, with prior experience in landscape architecture,
environmental planning, urban design, visual impact assessment, visualization and
landscape construction management. His thesis project integrated sustainable urban
drainage systems with productive urban landscapes for improved urban ecology and place-
making opportunities. As a student, Winston received the ILASA prize for the best
landscape design portfolio; and as a graduate, Winston led his team to victory at the IFLA
Young Professionals Design Symposium.

11. REFERENCES
CoCT, 2013a. 2011 Census Suburb- Bellville. Available at:

https://www.capetown.gov.za/en/stats/2011CensusSuburbs/2011_Census_CT_Suburb_Bel
lville_Profile.pdf
CoCT, 2013b. 2011 Census - Cape Town.

Available at:
https://www.capetown.gov.za/en/stats/Documents/2011%20Census/2011_Census_Cape_T
own_Profile.pdf
Day, L. 2015.
Review of the ecological condition and water quality of the Elsieskraal River, Bellville.
Prepared by Liz Day, Freshwater Consulting Group cc for Gibbs Saint Pôl, June, 2015.
GTP, 2015. Infrastructure and Service Delivery. Available at:

http://www.gtp.org.za/our-programmes/@id=41.htm
HNTB Wenk, 2008.

Boneyard Creek Master Plan.
Prepared for the City of Urbana, Illinois. May, 2008. Available at:
http://urbanaillinois.us/sites/default/files/attachments/Boneyard_masterplan.pdf
Mucina, L (Ed) & Rutherford, M (Ed), 2006

The Vegetation of South Africa, Lesotho and Swaziland
Strelitzia 19, South African National Biodiversity Institute, Pretoria
Saratoga Associates, 2015.

Daylighting of the Saw Mill River. Available at: http://www.saratogaassociates.com/saw-
mill-river-daylighting/
Scurr, M. & De Waal, J, 2015. Heritage baseline study for the Elsieskraal Green Belt.
Prepared by Mike Scurr of Rennie Scurr Adendorf Architects and Janine de Waal of Janine
de Waal Architects and heritage practitioners for Gibbs Saint Pôl, May, 2015.
Yu, Konjian & Tursenscape, 2015.

City Green: Landscape as a living system Shanghai 2010 Expo Houtan Park. Available
at: http://www.turenscape.com/english/news/view.php?id=327

12. APPENDICES

Appendix A: Initial Public Meeting Minutes

CK 2011/037636/23
t +27(0) 21 447 8160 | f +27(0) 86 610 8350
MEETING NOTES: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING
PROJECT: Elsieskraal River Green Belt

LOCATION: Bellville Library Auditorium
DATE: 17 June, 2015
TIME: 16h30 – 18h30
The Greater Tygerberg Partnership (GTP) has identified the Elsieskraal Green Belt (the project area) as a
strategic space which can be upgraded to contribute to the regeneration of the Bellville Central Business
District. Gibbs Saint Pôl Landscape Architects cc (Gibbs Saint Pôl) was appointed by GTP to develop a
conceptual design framework for the project area as well as a conceptual design proposal for a catalytic
intervention within the Elsieskraal River system (the project).
A meeting was held on 17 June 2015 with members of the public to discuss the project. Gibbs Saint Pôl
presented their analysis of the site and an informants diagram illustrating their understanding of the natural
and urban environment. Members of the public were invited to participate in a design charrette to identify
potential opportunities and constraints, as well as a vision for the project area.
Participants identified the following constraints during the design charrette:

 Homeless people use the project area for bathing and ablutions.
 There are problems associated with drug abuse in the project area and there is visible drug use in the
southern portion between Davies Avenue and Voortrekker Road.
 The southern portion has been fenced off and the staircase leading into the area has been eliminated.
Currently, the tunnel below Davies Road is used to gain access to the area. Access control to the
southern portion is crucial and stricter access control is required.
 There is low visibility and poor lighting in the southern portion, providing an opportunity for criminal
activities.
 There are holes in the fencing that homeless people or criminals use to gain access to restricted areas.
 Wind eddy’s blow trash and litter into the southern portion.
 The southern portion is infested with rats and berms in the area are collapsing because of this.
 The area is poorly maintained and there are a number of degraded structures/ paved areas.
 There is a dangerous open catch pit structure in the southern portion which has fencing surrounding it,
but is not covered or enclosed. There is also a significant amount of litter and rubble associated with
the catch pit, causing a safety hazard.
Participants identified the following opportunities during the design charrette:

 The area is quite large, so different areas of the site could have different characteristics.
 The northern portion of the project area is much more visible and open and can be used by neighboring
residents in the area.
 The owner of Parc Du Ville wants to develop student housing and a coffee shop facing onto the
southern portion, adjacent to Voortrekker Road.
 Students and business people could make use of the southern portion during lunch time.
 The southern portion contains a relatively flat open space that can be used for sporting activities.
 Children that live adjacent to the southern portion do not have play facilities or a safe and desirable
place to play and there is an opportunity to provide a safe play space for children.
 By making the green space desirable, children will be able to play in the park and on the grass.
 Trees can be used in appropriate ways to create screening and shelter.
 More activity could be brought into the area by linking the Danie Uys/ Jack Miller fun run/ walk
through the area.
MARK SAINT POL PrLArch (SA) # 20201, MLArch (UCT), BTech (CPUT), NDip Hort (DIT), member: ILASA, ILASA-Cape, Society of APES
m +27(0) 72 404 8886, e mark@gibbssaintpol.co.za
# 402 Salt Circle, 19 Kent Street, SALT RIVER, 7925 t +27 (0) 21 447 3108, f +27 (0) 86 610 8350, www.gibbssaintpol.co.za
gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc | CK 2011/037636/23
Participants identified the following elements as part of their vision for the site during the design charrette:
 Children’s play areas in southern and northern portions.
 Vegetable gardens and urban agriculture in the northern portion.
 Rose or flower gardens attracting visitors to the space and creating the potential to have rose growing
competitions between local residents.
 Sports ground/ sporting facilities for Cricket/Soccer in the southern portion.
 BMX cycling tracks or bicycle tracks leading through the project area.
 A skate park for children in the northern portion.
 A mini golf course/ putt putt area in the northern portion.
 A potential coffee shop in the northern portion.
 A dog park for people with dogs in the area.
 Picnic areas.
 Walkways leading through the space to allow trail runs linking to the Danie Uys/ Jack Miller Park.
 Usable facilities for the old age home, such as trails/ paths, resting spots underneath trees.
 Appropriate seating (benches) in strategic places next to pathways or overlooking particular areas.
 Signage to assist with orientation and provide information about the park.
 Art and sculptures.
 Appropriate planting (low shrubs) to maximize visibility and safety.
 Appropriate trees in appropriate places, some of which could be pruned to create sculptural elements.
 Use as a wedding venue with trees/ rose garden/ sculptural elements as a backdrop for photographs.
 Use for Christmas Carols during Christmas time.
 A bridge between the Danie Uys/ Jack Miller Park and the project area for use during the Danie Uys/ Jack
Miller Park fun run.
 Artificial wetland features to filter stormwater and improve water quality in the river.
 Ablution facilities that can be used during the daytime and secured at night.
 Appropriate lighting must be provided to ensure safety at night.
 The area must be kept clear of litter at all times.
 Developments that complement the site (such as the coffee shop in the southern portion) must be
supported.
Additional comments received from participants:

 The local council should be pressurized to take control of litter. MESS (working with homeless people and
substance abuse) should get involved with council to help clean up the area.
 The dangerous open catch pit structure should be fenced off and a gate should be put in place to ensure
that criminals cannot access the area.
 Fencing must be upgraded and strong access control will be required once the coffee shop opens up in the
southern portion.
 Council should put up proper lighting in the area to ensure safety.
 The project area should be closed down at night for safety reasons.
Appendix B: Second Public Meeting Minutes

CK 2011/037636/23
t +27(0) 21 447 8160 | f +27(0) 86 610 8350
MEETING NOTES: PUBLIC PARTICIPATION MEETING
PROJECT: Elsieskraal River Green Belt

LOCATION: Bellville Library Auditorium
DATE: 15 July, 2015
TIME: 17h00 – 18h30
The Greater Tygerberg Partnership (GTP) has identified the Elsieskraal Green Belt (the project area) as a
strategic space which can be upgraded to contribute to the regeneration of the Bellville Central Business
District (CBD). Gibbs Saint Pôl Landscape Architects cc (Gibbs Saint Pôl) was appointed by the GTP to develop a
conceptual design framework for the project area as well as a strategic design intervention within the
Elsieskraal River system (the project).
An initial public meeting was held on 17 June 2015 to discuss the project. At this meeting, Gibbs Saint Pôl
presented their analysis of the project area and an informants diagram illustrating their understanding of the
natural and urban environment. Members of the public were invited to participate in a design charrette to
identify potential opportunities and constraints, as well as a vision for the project area. A design framework
and a strategic design intervention for the project area was prepared by Gibbs Saint Pôl, taking the comments
received from stakeholders during the first meeting into consideration.
A second public meeting was held on 15 July to present the design framework for the site as well as the
proposed strategic design intervention. The purpose of the meeting was to provide an opportunity for the
public to give their input into the final framework and assist with the formulation of a partnership programme
going forward. Interested members of the public were invited to attend both meetings, through the
placements of adverts in the Tygerburger newspaper and e-mail notifications. Approximately 7 members of the
public attended the initial meeting, while approximately 30 participants attended the second meeting.
It was explained during the second meeting that the design framework presents an overall vision for the space
that can be implemented over time. As the need arises, various elements of the framework could be
implemented, depending on the feasibility and available funding. Certain elements could also be reconsidered,
revised or excluded and additional elements could be incorporated into the framework. This will take place as
a collaborative process facilitated by the partnership programme initiative, in collaboration with the GTP and
the City Parks Department. The framework should therefore be seen as a strategic vision that will be revised
over time through engagement with local stakeholders and its success rests on public involvement and
participation.
The majority of stakeholders that attended the second meeting were residents of the area to the west of Scott
Street. A number of concerns were raised by these residents, with specific reference to the area between
Davies Avenue and Protea Avenue, including:
 Crime and safety concerns and the use of the Green Belt as an escape route for criminals.
 Vagrants using the river and the associated Green Belt for ablutions.
 Illegal activities, including drug abuse and sex.
 Litter, including drug paraphernalia and condoms.
 Infrastructural dilapidation, including the degradation of river embankments and other areas.
A number of topics relating to these concerns and the design framework were discussed. These discussions
have been summarized in the comments and responses table below for ease of reference (see Table 1). It
should be noted that many of these concerns would be addressed during future phases of the project, although
possible preliminary suggestions were provided during the meeting.
MARK SAINT POL PrLArch (SA) # 20201, MLArch (UCT), BTech (CPUT), NDip Hort (DIT), member: ILASA, ILASA-Cape, Society of APES
m +27(0) 72 404 8886, e mark@gibbssaintpol.co.za
# 402 Salt Circle, 19 Kent Street, SALT RIVER, 7925 t +27 (0) 21 447 3108, f +27 (0) 86 610 8350, www.gibbssaintpol.co.za
gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc | CK 2011/037636/23
Table 1: Comments and Responses: Elsieskraal Green Belt design framework – public meeting 15 July 2015:
Comments Responses
The accessibility indicated in the Surveillance is key in ensuring that open spaces are safe for public
framework plan would aggravate use. Passive surveillance by community members can be facilitated
crime, particularly in the area through encouraging positive uses within open spaces which have
between Davies Avenue and Protea become degraded. If it becomes evident to illicit users of the space
Avenue. The flow of people through that ownership has been taken of the space by the local community
the area is a safety concern. There and that improvements are being made to the area to increase
should be controlled entry points in usability, the safety of the space will be improved.
the area between Davies Avenue and Controlled access is something that must be carefully considered.
Protea Avenue and fencing should be Reduced access could reduce surveillance and the associated safety
placed around the area to improve of the area and would not necessarily increase safety. Similarly,
security and reduce crime. fencing that is not carefully considered, would not necessarily
improve the safety of the area. It is important that fencing and
access control is used strategically to ensure that the space is
useable and does not become further degraded, encouraging criminal
behaviour. Fencing that reduces access and creates a sense of
‘exclusion’ could have the opposite effect and attract illicit
activities.
It is noted that security concerns are of key importance to the local
community. These aspects must be taken into consideration during
the detailed design phase of the project to ensure that these
concerns can be addressed over time, using appropriate and well
considered interventions.
How will the framework plan help to Vagrancy is a complex socio-economic issue which cannot be easily
reduce vagrancy in the area? addressed or alleviated. Organizations in the Bellville area, such as
MES, are currently working towards alleviating social problems
associated with vagrancy, such as drug abuse. Vagrancy is not
necessarily associated with increased crime, although it might reduce
the desirability of the space for public use. Vagrancy is a concern
that must be addressed in collaboration with community members.
Improved safety and surveillance within the project area would aim
to reduce opportunistic crime within the area.
The River itself attracts vagrants to The character of the Green Belt is centered on the Elsieskraal River.
the area and should be closed off. It is acknowledged that the River is in a poor ecological condition and
that there is some debate as to whether it should be covered in
certain areas. However, the City of Cape Town’s policy is to improve
River habitats for ecological and recreational purposes rather than
closing them off and losing an opportunity to allow people to engage
with the natural environment.
The River could perform an important role in the local ecology of the
area and is also of considerable heritage significance. It could also
perform an educational role, providing an opportunity for people to
understand the urbanized ecology of the river environment and the
important ecosystem services river systems provide in urban areas.
Within the design framework, there are many opportunities
associated with utilizing the River as a design element, such as
creating educational wetland environments, rather than closing it up
from view.
The debate as to whether or not the River should be closed in certain
areas can be continued and refined during the detailed design phase,
where there may be opportunities to open and rehabilitate the river
in areas, or to close portions of it, if necessary.
The bridge between Bloem Street Accessibility to various portions of the project area is important to
and Wilge Street should be removed ensure that the space is well utilized, thereby increasing surveillance
or fenced off. Criminals are most and safety. Crossing points over the river are important to ensure
prevalent in this area and security that the site can be traversed by pedestrians and users of the space
monitoring should be implemented at comfortable distances. It is acknowledged that the Bloem Street
in this area. bridge is currently a concern for residents. It should be noted that
the removal of the bridge would not necessarily increase safety
within the park, as opportunistic criminals would likely find
alternative means to escape, if the overall safety of the area is not
improved. The removal of the bridge is noted as a concern raised by
community members and would therefore need to be carefully
considered during the detailed design phase of the project.
The proposed connection between The design framework provides and overall vision for the project area
the Jack Muller/ Danie Uys Park is which can be implemented over time. It is acknowledged that the
not feasible. The road is not wide current street design does not facilitate easy movement along
enough for pedestrians along Alexandra Street. However, these types of concerns can be resolved
Alexander Street near the Vodacom through detailed design during subsequent phases of the project, as
and the Checkers. the need arises and with the available funding.
Lighting will make the area more Lighting would aim improve security in certain areas at night.
useable by vagrants and illicit users Lighting must be carefully considered and placed in areas where
of the space. activity and movement should be encouraged at night. It is possible
that areas that currently attract illicit activities may become further
degraded with the implementation of lighting. However, lighting
would also improve the overall security of the area, if strategically
located. Concerns regarding lighting would need to be resolved
during the detailed design phase of the project.
Money will be misspent on the Green The GTP has identified the Green Belt as a strategically intervention
Belt and it would remain inhabited within the Bellville CBD. The area is located at the interface with
by vagrants. Children don’t play various commercial and residential activities and in close proximity
outside anymore and the space will to transport hubs and public facilities. There are a number of
not be well used. Money should potential users and it is considered likely that the revitalization of
rather be spent on improving other the public space will support community interaction and integration,
areas in Boston that require thereby strengthening the revitalization of the Bellville CBD. The
rehabilitation, rather than focusing allocation of funds by the various government departments would
on this area. need to be carefully considered from a strategic perspective, based
on strategic priorities in the area.
Has there been a study for current A comprehensive analytical investigation of the area was completed,
use of the Park, i.e. surveys of including an analysis of current uses of the space. Specific surveys
users? involving interviewing users of the park were not conducted at this
stage of the project, due to cost considerations.
What does the partnership The local community’s support of the broad scale design framework
programme entail? Will the proposal is very important to ensure the success of the project. The
partnership programme be taken public partnership initiative would involve collaboration between
seriously by government various public and private parties, including local residents,
departments? neigbouring schools and business associations and the potential
formation of a ‘friends of the Green Belt’ initiative. City Parks is
aware of the project and has been consulted as part of the public
partnership programme and is willing to assist with the project where
possible, in collaboration with community members. The role of the
GTP is to facilitate discussion between the public and the City Parks
department and to facilitate development initiatives suggested by
community members through the public partnership initiative. During
future phases of the project, certain elements of the framework will
need to be prioritized for implementation in collaboration between
GTP, City Parks and the ‘friends of the Green Belt’ group.
How will funding be secured and Funding can be secured through various means, including public
what is the process going forward. private partnerships. The project would need to be driven by the
partnership programme initiative. Funding from various government
departments could potentially be secured, depending on
interdepartmental collaboration and the availability of funding for
certain activities. Funding could also be secured from private
initiatives, supported by the partnership programme.
The public participation process was Public meetings were held to obtain input from stakeholders during
not open and inclusive and the early phase of the project. Efforts were made to inform potential
stakeholders were not made aware stakeholders about the meetings through advertisements in the
of the meeting. Tygerburger and e-mail notifications. Engagement with the public is
of key importance and will remain important as the project becomes
further developed and refined over time.
The final document containing the analysis information, design framework and public meeting notes will be
submitted to the GTP and made available to the public, if required. The aim would then be for the partnership
programme initiative, involving collaboration between the ‘Friends of the Green Belt’ group, the GTP and
various government departments, including City Parks, to drive the implementation of the framework over
time, with the support of the local community.
Appendix C: Written Stakeholder Comments Received

7/21/2015 Gibbs Saintpol Mail Fwd: GPT presentation at the Bellville Library
Larissa Heyns <larissa@gibbssaintpol.co.za>
Fwd: GPT presentation at the Bellville Library

Larissa Heyns <larissa@gibbssaintpol.co.za> Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 1:50 PM
Draft
Forwarded message

From: David Pedersen <David.Pedersen@exprogroup.com>
Date: Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 2:33 PM
Subject: GPT presentation at the Bellville Library
To: "rhuben@gibbssaintpol.co.za" <rhuben@gibbssaintpol.co.za>
Hello,
Thank you for the GPT presentation at the Bellville Library.
It is great that that Cape town is looking Greening and upgrading the Bellville City centre.
The proposal and presentation was well put together.
Upgrading the parks to create a safe beautiful space can uplift out neighbourhood values.
But this process cannot be stretched over 5 years – because will cause downgrade in this area Between
Davies Street and DF Malan High school.
Please thank the presenter for a good presentation that was well presented.
Please forward the suggested activities layout and Key of the area Between Davies Street and DF Malan
High school
Thank you,
David
David Pedersen | SSA Central Buyer | Expro Group
Direct: +27 (0) 21 929 6838 | Cellphone: +27 (76) 468 4866 |
Email: David.Pedersen@exprogroup.com
1 Assegaai Road | Parow Industria | Cape Town | South Africa | 7493

https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=53a417c879&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=14eb0731f272b6eb&dsqt=1&siml=14e9717ee5549620&siml=14eb0… 1/2
7/21/2015 Gibbs Saintpol Mail Fwd: GPT presentation at the Bellville Library
Important Notice The information in this email is confidential and may be legally privileged. If you have
reason to believe you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, distribution or any action
taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it is prohibited and may be unlawful and you are requested to
contact the sender urgently and dispose of this email. We make every effort to keep our network free from
viruses. You should, however, check this email, and any attachments to it, for viruses, as we will not be
liable for direct, special, indirect or consequential damages as a result of any virus being passed on, or
arising from alteration of the contents of this message by a third party. Company registration details,
including registered office information, for Expro's principal UK companies can be found via the following
link: www.exprogroup.com/aboutus/locations/#Europe_CIS
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=53a417c879&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=14eb0731f272b6eb&dsqt=1&siml=14e9717ee5549620&siml=14eb0… 2/2
7/21/2015 Gibbs Saintpol Mail Fwd: Fotos
Fwd: Fotos
Draft
Forwarded message

From: Heloise J Seal <heloiseseal@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 7:01 PM
Subject: Fwd: Fotos
To: rhuben@gibbssaintpol.co.za
Dear Sir/Madam
Thank you for this opportunity to comment on the suggestions made by yourselves regarding the Jack Muller
park and adjusting green belt.
1. I love the dog park idea.

2. I love the idea of new walkways.
3. Basically I love 98% of your suggestions.
I would like to suggest that you relook/rethink the walk way over the little bridge in my pictures. Leaving the
bridge, the pedestrians have created a natural "shortcut".
To force them to use the new suggested walkway you will have to stop then using the old "natural" one.
One suggestion would be to carve it out and make it so steep that they would not be able to use it.
The other suggestion is to remove the existing bridge and bring it up a bit north (ie towards DF Malan High
School.
Limiting the aces to the park to 2 entry points instead of the 3 that you proposed.
This will add to a "natural" solution to the concern about to many aces to the area potentially increasing
crime and loitering in the already trouble area.
A Few general comments. The banks of the river is falling into the river, so an upgrade would be fantastic
The banks of the river are very steep so making a garden will need a lot op preparation to make the area
more flat. Maybe this can be done in the same phase
work on the banks are planned.
Thank you for your time

Heloise SealBosman
Cell 083 261 3371
Sent from my iPad
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=53a417c879&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=14eb084d507d7902&dsqt=1&siml=14ea62a1b8609db8&siml=14eb0… 1/3

Larissa Heyns LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT | ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
MLArch (UCT), BSc ConsEcol (US)
m +27(0) 72 304 0654 | e larissa@gibbssaintpol.co.za

t +27(0) 21 447 8160 | f +27(0) 86 610 8350
# 402 Salt Circle, 19 Kent Road, Salt River, 7925
This email, including attachments, is confidential, may be privileged, proprietary and is intended solely for the use of the named
recipient(s)and access to it by any other person is unauthorized. If you are not the intended recipient or (the person responsible
for delivering this document to the intended recipient), do not disclose, distribute, retain it or in any other way use or rely on the
information contained in this email and please notify the sender immediately and delete the email. Such unauthorized use may
be unlawful. Email is not necessarily secure or error free as information could be intercepted, corrupted, lost, destroyed, arrive
late or incomplete or contain viruses. It is your responsibility to ensure that emails are virus free. No one may conclude a contract
on behalf of the company by email without express written confirmation by a duly authorised representative of the company. The
company accepts no responsibility for any loss or damages arising in any way from the use of this email as a means of
communication
5 attachments
IMG_0248.JPG
815K
IMG_0247.JPG
937K
IMG_0246.JPG
687K
IMG_0245.JPG
2048K
IMG_0244.JPG
2295K
7/21/2015 Gibbs Saintpol Mail Fwd: ElsiesKraal River
Fwd: ElsiesKraal River

Draft
Forwarded message

From: Johan Bosman <johandbosman@outlook.com>
Date: Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 12:45 PM
Subject: ElsiesKraal River
To: "rhuben@gibbssaintpol.co.za" <rhuben@gibbssaintpol.co.za>
Hi
Thank you for your presentation last week.
I know it has been a lively discussion with us stepping off topic more than once.
Some background as to this :
We live in the neighbourhood and Tielman Marais park and the area’s south of Tielman Marais park impacts
us directly and not in a good way currently.
 It is not safe/secure and therefore does not lend itself to be utilised an open space to be enjoyed by
all.
 The "river" is not a river as such, more of an open storm water drain.
 It is currently in a state of disrepair and is a safety hazard.
 It is not maintained (The last time it was maintained properly must be about 3 years or more)
 The "banks" are very steep and as such is not an area that can be utilised as part of an open space.
 It attracts the unsavoursy element:
* Clothes being washed
* Bathing in public (Naked) and this close to 2 schools (DF Malan and Totius)
* Drug use and sales
* Sex in public
* Crime People being robbed and assaulted
* The park/river and bridge being used as escape routes/hiding place for criminal and vagrant
elements (not from the neighbourhood!)
This has of course caused many of the comments in the meeting and driven the discussion, thus taking
away from the presentation focus.
Back to the presentation/meeting

The presentation was welcomed with some great idea’s being presented.
The fact that no budget currently exists for this project is a concern, but I believe will/can be addressed going
forward.
Some points of concern to me regarding the project:
The meeting was not advertised (as far as I am aware) and we (the community members living next to the
park/"river") were not invited to the meeting. I believe we are primary stakeholders in this both from a
neighbourhood point of view as well as being rate payers.
I believe that budget was a driver (as was pointed out to us) and accepts this as the reason for no formal
invites to the project/meeting.
This is however a concern as the meeting is to be part of an inclusive process and as such I believe more
effort should have been made to directly involve/invite the community living in the adhering area.
The feeling (to me) was that the presentation was a fait accompli with the meeting a "rubberstamp" for the
idea's presented?
Discussion in the meeting has brought some clarity in statements that we do have some input towards the
vision of the way forward?
My vision
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=53a417c879&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=14eb0860a8455849&dsqt=1&siml=14eb04be540a3514&siml=14eb0… 1/4
The ElsiesKraal river project to be broken down into discreet parts as below:
1 Tielman Marais park Note that Tielman Marais park extends from Langenhoven street (North side) to just
south of the pedestrian bridge (Just south of Bloem (Corner of Bloem and Scott on the West side with Scott
street western border and Wilge street the east border)
(Tielman Marais park.jpg)
2 The part of ElsiesKraal river south of Tielman Marais park – South of Pedestrian bridge as above as
Northern border to Davies Ave/De Lange street as Southern border.
(ElsiesKraal river south of Tielman Marais park.jpg)
3 – The part with Davies Ave/De Lange street as North and Voortrekker road as South. ElsiesKraal river 3.jpg
4 Elizabeth park with Voortrekker road as north (ElsiesKraal Part 4 Elizabeth park.jpg)
My vision is centered around Parts 1 and 2 as it is the area close to me and affecting us as a neighbourhood.
We do believe that it needs to be addressed/looked as a whole in the bigger plan/vision, but our
immediate/direct concern is Tielman Marais park and part 2 (south of Tielman Marais park)
Part 1 Tielman Marais park

1–
Level out area with about 300 meter of the river to be enclosed in storm waterpipe (Tielman Marais park
Vision.jpg)
Same as is for about 600 to 800 meters from Jack Muller park (North) through area west of Checkers and DF
Malan sport grounds.
(ElsiesKraalRiver currently enclosed as stormwater pipe.jpg)
This will tie in with proposal for creating a
 Dog park
 Community garden
 Assist in making the park a space that can be used
 Cycling / running trail/s
2
We (As Bosbell neighbourhood and friends of Tielman Marais park) would like to adopt Tielman Marais park
as a neighbourhood park and work on upkeep/ beautification of such by
 Keeping it clean
 Keeping it in good repair
 Making it a green lung that is usable and adds to be bigger Bellville vision
 Plant indigenous trees/shrubs
3
Involve VRCID in assisting with safety/security for the park as well as immediate area. This is a different
discussion with VRCID, but it is vital to success of above vision as we will only have success and buy in
from the neighbourhood if it can be safe/secure going forward.
Part 2 ElsiesKraal river south of Tielman Marais park

As per your presentation, converting to wetlands would be great.
Please note that I believe focus will have to be on
 safety/security for any possibility of it being a success going forward
 Parks department to be actively involved in keeping it in shape/clean
To reiterate
I believe that if it is not safe/secure to walk/cycle in the park and surrounds, all efforts/plans/visions will
come to nought as none of the initiatives will be sustainable if safety/security is not addressed!
Overall, I believe we could make Tielman Marais park a jewel of the ElsiesKraal river project and as such fit
into the bigger picture.
A question regarding the river itself ?

Has department of Water affairs been consulted regarding this in any way, as it is a documented
waterway/river and I so not know whether this department should/must be involved ?
Thank you
Johan Bosman
082 8096678


t +27(0) 21 447 8160 | f +27(0) 86 610 8350
communication
6 attachments
ElsiesKraal Part 4 Elizabeth park.jpg

135K
ElsiesKraal river 2.jpg

112K
ElsiesKraal river 3.jpg

104K
ElsiesKraalRiver currently enclosed as stormwater pipe.jpg

210K
Tielman Marais park Vision.jpg

205K
Tielman Marais park.jpg

195K
7/22/2015 Gibbs Saintpol Mail Fwd: Elsieskraal Green Belt Tielman Marais Park GTP Proposals
Fwd: Elsieskraal Green Belt Tielman Marais Park GTP Proposals

Larissa Heyns <larissa@gibbssaintpol.co.za> Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:36 AM
Draft
Forwarded message

From: Karin Pedersen <pedersen@xsinet.co.za>
Date: Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 7:25 AM
Subject: Elsieskraal Green Belt Tielman Marais Park GTP Proposals
To: Rhuben Jacobs <rhuben@gibbssaintpol.co.za>
Cc: Johan Bosman <johandbosman@outlook.com>
Hello Rhuben,
Thank you for sharing GTP suggestions at the Bellville Library on15 July 2015, regarding greening and
uplifting the Central Bellville area.
We appreciate the work put into the proposed upliftment of the green belt on the Elsieskraal river between
Protea road to the north and to the south of Davies road. (road crosses over the river)
We as friends of the Tielman Marais Park are directly affected by proposals and decisions regarding the park
in front of our house, we are home owners.
We have 2 basic interests maintaining and improving the central Bellville are and Bosbell including the Parks.
1. The banks of the river is in places almost 45 degrees. Most of the park gradient is not practical for
playing or walking. Terracing most of the park is expensive. (not conducive to children playing)
The best way to make this park usable to many people and numerous activities bury the canal in a
storm water pipe. The same as under DF Malan’s rugby and cricket fields.
Some areas can be levelled (Horizontally flat) and other area slope with a 5 to 10 degree gradient to
the centre line of the park.
Thus, filing the steep gradient, complete with an underground storm water pipe is the most cost
effective way of enabling a multifunctional park.
The current canal has caved in and need of repair, 3 time in 5 years. The money for these repairs
could assist with the above which would be more permanent solution.
It will be great to see mothers with their children frequenting the park on week days and weekends
with the whole family.
For this to happen regularly and freely, Mom will need to know they are safe, risk free. Their littles
safety is imperative.
To improve safety; the crime gateway must be cut off south of the foot Bridge.
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=53a417c879&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=14eb4e8285b66e08&dsqt=1&siml=14eb4519c3a55941&siml=14eb4… 1/3
This area between the foot bridge and Davies road is also at this point in time, too dangerous for blue
collar workers coming to work from the Bellville train station and Taxi rank. Very few people walk to
and from work through this section.
This area has high walls or a high fence either side of the river. A set of stairs in south to Davies
road and to the North a narrow north access, leave the working walking pedestrians defenceless from
the hooligans to threaten them and take the few possessions they do have and or there hard earned
money.
This area between the foot bridge and Davies road is marked GTP Proposals for marches – this
means further excavating the soil next to the river to create a flat part at water level – the road is
already 20 metres below Durban road, if a further 10 meters of soil is removed this could structural
stability issue with retaining walls. (30 meters below Durban road)
It may be possible raise the river level (In the storm water drain under Tielman Marais Park) and add
soil to create marsh area at higher level than the current river level.
2. Block off access to Durban Road from the stop street on the corner of Alexander road to Durban road.
Already there directional traffic restriction into and out of the stop street due to accidents. (Durban road
traffic pressure)
This will also aid the safe multifunctional use of Tielman Marais Park.
South of the foot bridge crossing the Tielman Marais Park is crime gateway out of Boston. If we (and or the
police) follow the criminals with house contents (day or night) though this section of the park and under the
Davies road bridge you probably will not live to see the next day.
We love the green lung coming down from Willow Bridge Elsieskraal Green Belt, let’s work together to create
parks that can supply fun, recreation and exercise in open space for all to get fresh air.
Thank you to all uplifting Bellville city central.
David and Karin Pedersen
Bosbell


t +27(0) 21 447 8160 | f +27(0) 86 610 8350
communication
7/22/2015 Gibbs Saintpol Mail Fwd: Elsieskraal Green Belt GTP Proposals
Fwd: Elsieskraal Green Belt GTP Proposals

Larissa Heyns <larissa@gibbssaintpol.co.za> Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 10:37 AM
Draft
Forwarded message

From: Karin Pedersen <pedersen@xsinet.co.za>
Date: Wed, Jul 22, 2015 at 12:15 AM
Subject: Elsieskraal Green Belt GTP Proposals
To: Rhuben Jacobs <rhuben@gibbssaintpol.co.za>
Cc: Johan Bosman <johandbosman@outlook.com>
Hello Rhuben,
Thank you for sharing GTP suggestions at the Bellville Library 15 July 2015 regarding greening and uplifting
the Central Bellville area.
We appreciate the work put into the proposed upliftment of the green belt on the Elsieskraal river between
Protea road to the north and to the south of Davies road along the Elsieskraal river.
Please consider a Put Put game Range (baan) in the area south of Davies road.
This should fit practically very nicely into this enclosed space and it is a great peaceful activity.
This hopefully will attract the people that would enhance safety in the Bellville central area.
If this is possible this would fit well into your proposed plans.
Thank you,
David


t +27(0) 21 447 8160 | f +27(0) 86 610 8350
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=53a417c879&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=14eb4e8fd407677c&dsqt=1&siml=14eb450272960204&siml=14eb4… 1/2
7/22/2015 Gibbs Saintpol Mail Fwd: Elsieskraal Green Belt GTP Proposals
communication
https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=53a417c879&view=pt&search=inbox&msg=14eb4e8fd407677c&dsqt=1&siml=14eb450272960204&siml=14eb4… 2/2

19 Elsieskraal Green Belt Design Framework - September 2015 - Final With Appendices

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

19 Elsieskraal Green Belt Design Framework - September 2015 - Final With Appendices

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc

ELSIESKRAAL GREEN BELT

(Source: gibbs saintpol)

VIA Report prepared by gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc

for the Greater Tygerberg Partnership

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

3. SUB-REGIONAL ANALYSIS ......................................................................13

5. SITE ANALYSIS ...................................................................................35

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

5.7 Urban Systems ........................................................................................... 41

6. INFORMANTS, OPPORTUNITIES AND CONSTRAINTS .......................................46

7. STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT .................................................................48

8. CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK DESIGN ..........................................................50

9. Project implementation plan .................................................................70

10. CONTRIBUTORS ...............................................................................72

11. REFERENCES ...................................................................................73

12. Appendices ....................................................................................74

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

Figure 8.1: Landscape Structuring Diagram..................................................................... 52

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

CoCT City of Cape Town

MES Mould Empower Serve

GTP Greater Tygerberg Partnership

VOC Verenigde Oostindische Compagnie

VRCID Voortrekker Road Corridor Improvement District

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

Figure 1: Proposed strategic design intervention

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

1.1 Elsieskraal River Green Belt

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

Figure 1.1: Elsieskraal River Green Belt Locality Map

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

3.2 Integrated Drainage System

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

Figure 3.1: Salt catchment and the site

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

Figure 3.2: Salt River catchment hydrology

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

Figure 3.3: Integrated drainage system

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

Figure 3.4: Sub-regional climate

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

3.4 Geology and Landscape Character

Figure 3.5: Geology and landscape character

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

3.5 Natural Vegetation

Figure 3.6: Natural Vegetation

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

3.6 Biodiversity Network

Figure 3.7: CoCT biodiversity network

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

3.7 Open Space Networks

Figure 3.8: CoCT open space network

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

3.8 Integrated Biodiversity and Open Space Networks

Figure 3.9: Integrated biodiversity and open space network

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015

Figure 4.1: Green open space network

gibbs saintpôl Landscape Architects cc September 2015